U.S. patent number 4,026,561 [Application Number 05/573,773] was granted by the patent office on 1977-05-31 for golf game apparatus.
Invention is credited to Blanche N. Baldorossi, Raymond F. Baldorossi.
United States Patent |
4,026,561 |
Baldorossi , et al. |
May 31, 1977 |
Golf game apparatus
Abstract
A game playable in an area only approximately one-fifteenth of
the area of a regulation golf course, with the length of play being
approximately one-fifth the length of a regulation 18-hole golf
course, comprising a large ball and a set of golfing clubs having
heads of large size. The ball has a small weight-to-volume ratio in
that it weighs approximately 2 ounces and is approximately 5 inches
in diameter, and typically is of lightweight foam construction.
Each of the clubs of said set of clubs has a head having a weight
very similar to that of a regulation golf club, and a face inclined
at approximately the angle of the corresponding regulation golf
club. Each of the faces, however, have a surface area approximately
2.8 times larger than the faces of regulation golf clubs, with the
relationship between the ball and each of the clubs being such as
to permit a form of play action very much like the play action of
regulation golf in that a player will be able to utilize an
unrestricted swing in hitting said ball and obtain a feel very
similar to that received when he swings a regulation golf club and
hits a regulation golf ball. Desirably, however, the ball in this
instance travels for a comparatively short distance because of its
small weight-to-volume ratio.
Inventors: |
Baldorossi; Blanche N.
(Orlando, FL), Baldorossi; Raymond F. (Orlando, FL) |
Family
ID: |
24293342 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/573,773 |
Filed: |
May 1, 1975 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
461511 |
Apr 16, 1974 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
473/256;
473/280 |
Current CPC
Class: |
A63B
53/047 (20130101); A63B 69/3655 (20130101); A63B
53/04 (20130101); A63B 63/06 (20130101); A63B
57/357 (20151001); A63B 69/3676 (20130101); A63B
71/04 (20130101); A63B 57/40 (20151001); A63B
2043/001 (20130101); A63B 53/005 (20200801); A63B
53/0458 (20200801); A63B 53/0408 (20200801) |
Current International
Class: |
A63B
53/04 (20060101); A63B 57/00 (20060101); A63B
69/36 (20060101); A63B 71/04 (20060101); A63B
53/00 (20060101); A63B 069/36 (); A63B
053/04 () |
Field of
Search: |
;273/DIG.8,178A,176AA,176AB,58A,193R,193A,193B,199R,199A,194R,77A |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Marlo; George J.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Renfro; Julian C.
Parent Case Text
REFERENCE TO EARLIER INVENTION
This is a continuation-in-part of our copending application Ser.
No. 461,511, filed Apr. 16, 1974 and entitled "SOFTGOLF," now
abandoned.
Claims
We claim:
1. Apparatus which permits a game of golf to be played in a limited
area, approximately one-fifth the length of an average 18 hole golf
course, comprising a large golf ball and a set of golf clubs having
heads of large size, said ball having a diameter of 4.2 to 5
inches, a weight of 2 to 21/2 ounces, and a weight-to-volume ratio
between 0.03 and 0.06, each of the clubs of said set of clubs
having a head having a weight very similar to that of a regulation
golf club, and a face inclined at approximately the angle of the
corresponding regulation golf club, each of said faces, however,
having a surface area of between 12 and 16 square inches, the
relationship between said ball and each of said clubs being such as
to permit a form of play action very much like the play action of
regulation golf in that a player will be able to utilize an
unrestricted swing in hitting said ball and obtain a feel very
similar to that received when he swings a regulation golf club and
hits a regulation golf ball, the ball, however, traveling for a
comparatively short distance because of its small weight-to-volume
ratio.
2. The apparatus as defined in claim 1 in which the interior of
said ball is largely made up of closed cell lightweight foam
material, over which a covering of comparatively tough material is
disposed.
3. The apparatus as defined in claim 2 in which the innermost
portion of the interior of said ball is hollow.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Many generations of sportsmen and sportswomen have enjoyed the game
of golf which, in the classic instance, is played on an 18-hole
course having a playing length of several thousand yards. The
approximate area of an average eighteen hole regulation golf course
is one-hundred twenty acres. Most golfers enjoy the long fairways
and the broad greens and look forward to each next occasion when
they can travel to the golf course and indulge in this fine
game.
However, due to increased population, rising real estate prices,
and higher taxes, as well as other factors including inflation, it
is no longer a simple matter to raise the substantial amount of
funds necessary in order for the establishment and construction of
a golf course of regulation size.
Because a golf course typically requires so much acreage, and
because of the land values and municipal taxes involved, it is
necessary to create golf courses that are further and further from
residential areas. This of course means that a golfer must travel
for great distances in many instances in order to pursue this game.
Also, he or she must be willing to pay large membership fees and
substantial yearly fees if he or she is to belong to a typical golf
club.
A number of substitutes for the regulation game of golf have been
proposed, but none of these has ever achieved popularity.
SUMMARY OF THIS INVENTION
In accordance with this invention, we have evolved a new game we
call "softgolf" which may be played in much the manner of
regulation golf but in locations where considerable acreage is not
available. Because we utilize a ball having a weight closely
similar to the weight of a regulation golf ball, but which has a
diameter of approximately 5 inches, our ball has a small
weight-to-size ratio. Because of the small weight-to-size ratio and
the elasticity of the ball material, the coefficient of restitution
is greatly affected. We have found through extensive experiments
that our ball will travel only one-fourth or one-fifth the distance
that the regulation golf ball would have traveled had it been
struck with an equivalent swing by a corresponding regulation golf
club.
Not only does the softgolf ball in accordance with this invention
travel for comparatively short distances, but also, because of the
type materials used and its small weight-to-size ratio, it will not
cause harm or damage, which of course is another way of saying that
even if the ball in flight strikes a person, it will not have the
possible lethal effect that a regulation golf ball would have
had.
Because we have carefully sized the ball while retaining a proper
weight thereof, and proportionally sized up the face of each of the
clubs of the set of clubs we use, we have preserved the "feel" that
the golfer normally obtains when he swings a regulation golf club
and hits a regulation golf ball. In other words, we have made it
possible for a golfer having only a limited space available, to
nevertheless keep up his game and be able to hit balls with full
energy swings without having to travel considerable distances in
order to find space sufficient for hitting conventional golf
balls.
The game we have developed is realistic in many aspects, for we
envision a set of clubs closely corresponding to regulation golf
clubs insofar as length, weight and face angle are concerned, with
the principal departure involving an increase in face area so as
best to contact the large ball we use. The golfer can practice his
driving, putting and other requisite skills of the golfer in the
privacy of his home or yard, or in a nearby vacant lot, and thus
effectively keep in practice without wondering if he will cause
damage or lose the ball.
As should be obvious, the game we have devised lends itself as a
sport played by the individual, or by groups or families, and
various contests and competitions may be established in the form of
leagues, tournaments, and other challenges. Our game also may form
the basis for a business franchise, operated separately or in
conjunction with campgrounds, mobile home parks, hotels, recreation
parks, resorts and the like, with all of this being able to be
accomplished at but a fraction of the cost of a regulation golf
course. For example, a nine hole course in accordance with this
invention can be accommodated in approximately five acres, and an
eighteen hole course in approximately eight acres.
It is therefore a principal object of this invention to provide a
golf game that is closely realistic to regulation golf, but which
is entirely non-hazardous, enabling it to be played in a city or in
other municipal area where space is limited.
It is another object of our invention to provide a novel yet
realistic golf game utilizing a ball having a comparatively low
weight-to-size ratio, which advantageously will travel only about
one-fourth or one-fifth the distance of a regulation golf ball when
equivalent swings are involved, thus enabling the full enjoyment of
the game to be realized in approximately one-fourth the time span
of regulation golf.
It is yet another object of our invention to provide a novel game
enabling a golfer to keep up his golf game in a very effective
manner by daily or mid-week practice utilizing a large size ball
with regulation weight, with such being able to be accomplished
with the confidence that the swing as well as other characteristics
of this game are closely comparable to regulation golf.
It is still another object of this invention to provide a novel and
highly enjoyable game that can be played on a course requiring only
a fraction of the acreage of the regulation golf course.
It is yet still another object of our invention to provide a
softgolf game involving multiple clubs comparable to regulation
clubs, such that the avid golfer can practice long hitting even in
urban areas, and can practice his putting skills as well.
It is another object to provide a game lending itself to adoption
by groups, institutions, municipalities or private individuals,
inasmuch as an entire course provided in accordance with this
invention occupies but a fraction of the area and involves but a
fraction of the cost of a conventional course.
It is yet another object of our invention to provide a novel and
highly effective portable ball trap.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 shows a golfer holding a club and addressing a ball in
accordance with this invention, with this figure revealing to some
extent the increase in accordance with this invention of the size
of the ball and club face over that of regulation golf;
FIG. 2 is a view to full scale looking into the front of a typical
loft club in accordance with this invention;
FIG. 3 is a full scale view of a preferred embodiment of a ball in
accordance with our softgolf game, with the ball in this instance
being constructed of closed cell lightweight foam, over which a
skin of tough, wear-resistant flexible material is provided;
FIG. 4 is a view to one-half scale, looking into the front of a
club having substantially less loft angle than the club shown in
FIG. 2;
FIG. 4A is an isometric view of the club whose front edge is
illustrated in FIG. 4;
FIGS. 5, 6 and 7 are illustrative of three more loft clubs in
accordance with this invention, each being shown to one-half scale,
and each finding a counterpart in a regulation golf club set;
FIGS. 5A through 7A are face views of the same clubs shown in FIGS.
5 through 7 respectively;
FIG. 8 is a front view of a putter club in accordance with this
invention, and FIG. 8A is a side view of the same club;
FIG. 9 is another embodiment of a softgolf ball in accordance with
this invention, in this instance involving a ball having a thick
outer wall and a hollow interior, with closed cell medium density
foam being utilized in its construction;
FIG. 9A is still another embodiment of a softgolf ball, in this
instance being a ball entirely constructed of closed cell flexible
foam and having an integral skin foamed in place;
FIG. 10 typifies a golfer teeing off on a softgolf course, in this
instance involving a par 4 playing hole with a distance of 65 to 85
yards, with the solid line showing the travel of a softgolf ball,
and the dashed lines being utilized to show the distance that would
have been traveled by a regulation golf ball when hit with the same
force by a golfer using a regulation golf club;
FIG. 11 is a schematic presentation of the trajectories associated
with a softgolf ball hit using various designated softgolf clubs in
accordance with this invention;
FIG. 12 is a comparable showing of distances traveled by regulation
golf balls when hit with conventional golf clubs corresponding to
the softgolf clubs mentioned in FIG. 11;
FIG. 13 is a chart involving a putter, Nos. 1, 4 and 8 irons, and a
wedge in accordance with softgolf criteria, with this in each
instance being set forth adjacent the corresponding regulation club
in order to show identicalness of loft angle, lie angle, club
length and weight for corresponding clubs, but contrasting the club
face areas and the range of average distance reached when using our
clubs;
FIG. 14 is a perspective view of a ball trap in accordance with
this invention, with a softgolf ball shown entering the trap;
and
FIG. 14A is a cross-sectional view of the ball trap revealing its
internal construction.
GENERAL DESCRIPTION
Turning to FIG. 1, it will there be seen we have shown a golfer in
a typical golfing stance, holding a golf club 10 in accordance with
our invention. It is to be noted that the club head 12 is of a size
that is noticeably larger than that of the corresponding regulation
club, with this enlarged size being appropriate for contacting the
ball 14 we use, which is of considerably larger diameter than the
diameter of a regulation golf ball.
As will be explained at length hereinafter, the club head 12 and
the ball 14 are of a weight such that the golfer will obtain a
"feel" almost identical to that when a golfer swings a regulation
club and hits a regulation golf ball. However, the ball 14 in
accordance with this invention is spherical, weighing approximately
2.2 ounces and having a diameter of approximately 4.8 inches, so it
has a weight-to-size ratio of about 0.458. However, we prefer to
refer to the ball in terms of its weight-to-volume ratio, as will
be seen hereinafter, with this ratio being approximately one
seventeenth of the weight-to-volume ratio of a regulation golf
ball. As a result, our ball will not travel nearly as far as a
regulation ball for an equivalent swing by the golfer, and as a
matter of fact, the ball in accordance with this invention
typically only travels about one-fourth as far. Although we prefer
the weight and size specified, we are not to be limited to these,
and as explained hereinafter, there can be some variation in
diameter and weight of the balls we use.
Turning to FIG. 2, we have there provided a full size showing of
the head 12 of a typical club in accordance with this invention,
with the face 16 of the club being disposed at approximately 55
degrees. In this regard, the club shown in FIG. 2 corresponds to a
wedge club of regulation golf. However, the area of the face 16 in
accordance with this invention is approximately 15.4 square inches,
or approximately 2.8 times the area of the face of the
corresponding regulation club. It will be pointed out in connection
with FIG. 13 how the clubs in accordance with this invention have
in each instance the same loft angle as the corresponding
regulation club, as well as the same weight and total length of the
shaft and head, but have a much larger club face area. We prefer to
use club heads of aluminum alloy, but are not to be limited to this
material.
Turning to FIG. 3, it is there to be seen that we have shown a
first embodiment of a ball 14 in accordance with this invention,
with a portion of the ball being cut away so as to reveal internal
construction. In a typical instance, a ball along the lines of that
shown in FIG. 3 has an internal portion of closed cell flexible
foam of a density of approximately 3 lbs. to 4 lbs. per cubic foot.
Obviously, many types of lightweight foams could not withstand
direct, forceful contact with the clubs in accordance with this
invention, so we typically have a covering 20 that is molded in
place. This may be either an integral formed skin or a thin tough
skin formed as a result of an applied coating.
A modified form of a ball in accordance with the embodiment of FIG.
3 may be of a closed cell flexible foam of a density of 2 lbs. to 3
lbs. per cubic foot, molded with a thick integral formed skin, or
alternatively equipped with a thick skin coating that has been
applied. In any event, the ball normally has a diameter of 4.80
inches, but we are not to be limited to this, for the ball diameter
could be as great as 5.0 inches or as small as 4.2 inches.
The ball 14 in accordance with this invention normally has a weight
of 2.2 ounces, but we are not to be limited to this weight, for the
ball can have a weight as great as 2.5 ounces, or as small as 2.0
ounces.
Based on the preferred or nominal weight of 2.2 ounces and diameter
of 4.80 inches, our ball has a nominal weight-to-volume ratio of
0.038. This value is obtained by dividing 2.2 ounces by 57.906
cubic inches, latter being the volume corresponding to this
diameter. As should be apparent, this weight-to-volume ratio is
quite small when compared to the weight-to-volume ratio of a
regulation golf ball.
Inasmuch as a regulation golf ball has a weight of 1.62 ounces and
a diameter of 1.68 inches, its weight-to-volume ratio is 0.6525,
this value being obtained by dividing 1.62 by 2.48 cubic inches,
the volume corresponding to a diameter of 1.68 inches.
Dividing the weight-to-volume ratio of the regulation golf ball by
the weight-to-volume ratio of the softgolf ball reveals that the
weight-to-volume ratio of the regulation golf ball is seventeen
times greater than the weight-to-volume ratio of our novel ball,
thus providing a very basic reason for the regulation golf ball
traveling four or so times the distance of our ball for equivalent
swings of respective clubs.
The weight-to-volume ratio of 0.038 is given by way of example, and
also by way of comparison with the weight-to-volume ratio of a
regulation golf ball. Actually, the ratio for a 5 inch diameter
ball weighing 2 ounces would be 0.0305, whereas the ratio for a 4.2
inch diameter ball weighing 2.5 ounces would be 0.0644.
Turning to FIGS. 4 through 7, it is there to be seen that we have
shown scale drawings looking into the front edge of several loft
clubs in accordance with this invention. The club in FIG. 4 is a
No. 1 club, with FIG. 4A showing an isometric view of the club
face. Somewhat similarly, in FIGS. 5, 6 and 7 we have shown front
edge views of other loft clubs in accordance with this invention,
with FIG. 5A being a view of the appearance of the club face of the
club shown in FIG. 5; FIG. 6A being a view of the appearance of the
club face of the club shown in FIG. 6; and FIG. 7A being a view of
the appearance of the club face of the club shown in FIG. 7. FIGS.
8 and 8A of course represent a putter in accordance with this
invention. It is to be realized in each instance that these clubs
correspond to regulation golf clubs from the standpoint of loft
angle, lie angle, length and weight, although they have a face area
typically in the vicinity of 2.8 to 4.2 times the face area of the
corresponding regulation club. It is also to be realized that we
are not to be restricted to club sets involving only the clubs
mentioned herein, for obviously other clubs could be provided in
consonance with this invention.
Turning to FIG. 9, it is to be seen that balls meeting the weight
and diameter criteria we have chosen do not necessarily have a
solid core. As shown in this Figure, the ball may have a hollow
interior, but utilize a comparatively thick shell or outer covering
portion. We have found that we can maintain the desired weight by
utilizing closed cell foam of approximately 17 pounds per cubic
foot up to approximately 36 pounds per cubic foot.
Turning to FIG. 9A, it is also to be seen that by utilizing closed
cell foam of particularly tough construction, it is possible to get
by without having a discrete covering on the ball. Other examples
of balls in accordance with our invention may utilize an interior
portion of cork or other light material, the external portion of
which has been covered with a smooth tough covering of plastic or
the like.
FIG. 10 reveals a golfer utilizing a golf course constructed in
accordance with the present invention, in which the fairway is of a
much smaller size than the conventional fairway, with the green
likewise being much closer than the green of a conventional golf
course. This figure portrays a par 4 softgolf playing hole, with a
distance of 65 to 85 yards being involved, whereas the green of the
conventional course is to be seen in phantom lines in the far
distance, normally 290 yards to 425 yards.
In FIG. 10, the golfer driving a softgolf ball in accordance with
this invention has utilized an unrestricted swing, with the solid
line representation revealing a flight distance of say 15 to 55
yards. Had he been using a regulation club and regulation ball, his
drive would have carried say 60 to 250 yards, as depicted by the
dashed lines.
Quite obviously, the city dweller can obtain all of the benefits of
the sport and exercise associated with golf merely by utilizing
equipment in accordance with this invention, inasmuch as the ball
does not travel, for an equivalent swing, nearly as far as the
regulation ball would have traveled. This of course makes it
possible for softgolf to be played quite effectively in a much more
confined area than regulation golf would have required.
Turning to FIG. 11 it is to be seen that we have shown typical
distances from the tee that have been reached by the golfer
utilizing a softgolf ball in accordance with this invention, with
various clubs in accordance with this invention having been used.
It is to be kept in mind that the golfer utilizing our equipment
obtains almost the same feel as he or she would have obtained using
regulation equipment, but the weight-to-volume ratio represented by
the softgolf balls we use prevents them from traveling more than
approximately one-fourth the distance than the regulation ball
struck by a regulation club would have traveled.
Turning to FIG. 12 it is to be seen that we have set forth yardage
obtained utilizing regulation golf equipment rather than softgolf
equipment. It is to be noted that the distance is 4 to 5 times as
great in this instance, thereby necessitating that considerable
area be available, as compared with the softgolf game in accordance
with this invention, which can be played in a much smaller
area.
Turning to FIG. 13, it is here to be seen that we have presented a
form of table in which five typical clubs, ranging from putter to
wedge, have been contrasted with regulation clubs of the same
designation. It is to be seen in each instance that the loft angle
of the softgolf club is the same as the regular golf club; the
total length of each corresponding club is the same; and the weight
in ounces of each corresponding club is the same. However, there is
a marked difference in the area of the club face of the softgolf
club when compared with the corresponding regulation club, with the
area ratio ranging from 4.2/.sub.1 for the putter, down to
2.8/.sub.1 for the wedge. Advantageously, the distance traveled by
the softgolf ball when struck by the softgolf club is about
one-fourth to one-fifth the distance traveled by the regulation
ball that has been struck by the corresponding regulation club, as
previously mentioned.
Turning to FIG. 14, we have shown an isometric view of a preferred
form of portable ball trap for a softgolf ball, the use of which
makes possible an impromptu playing of the game of softgolf. This
ball trap 24 of course is to allow the golfer to practice his or
her putting on a lawn, in a grass park area, athletic field, or
even in the livingroom or the family room of a home. As will be
noted from this figure and related FIG. 14A, the ball trap 24
entails a base 26, a tine loop 28, and an outer ring 30. The outer
ring is of course secured to the base 26 so as to hold the tine
loop in a secure position, with this being achieved by the use of
stitching, fasteners, adhesive or the like. Holes may be provided
in the base 26, enabling placement of a staff, and thus fastening
the base to the ground.
The interior portion of the tine loop 28 is cut or otherwise
configured to form a comparatively large number of independent
inwardly directed tines 32, each tine being approximately 21/4
inches long, and with each tine being bent at approximately a
45.degree. angle to the base of the tine loop. The tines are
typically of flexible material, such as rubber, coated or
impregnated cloth or paper, or plastic in a non-metallic version of
our trap, or of thin metal in a metallic version.
As viewed in FIG. 14, upon a softgolf ball being putted in the
direction of the ball trap, it rolls over the outer ring and over
certain of the tines, which, because of the thinness of the
material used, are quite flexible, which tines give way and allow
the ball to pass over in the manner shown in FIG. 4. However,
because of the resilient tine construction utilized, as soon as the
ball has traveled beyond the tines originally contacted, such tines
immediately return to their original position, in which they form
approximately a 45.degree. angle with the base.
If the ball has been putted harder than was necessary to merely
pass over the tines first contacted, the ball will of course travel
across the mid-portion of the base 26 and on to the other side of
the ball trap. As long as the ball is traveling at a speed no
greater than the limit permitted by the design of the device, upon
the ball striking the tines on the opposite side of the device, it
will be deflected back in approximately the original direction.
This is because the longitudinal rigidity or column strength of the
tines encountered on the opposite side of the ball trap is
sufficient to arrest the ball in its forward travel and cause it to
remain in the trap. We have found that the trap in accordance with
this invention is effective for a wide range of ball speeds,
although it is of course to be realized that if the ball is
traveling at great speed, the trap will no longer be effective, for
the ball may tend to jump over the tines at the far side of the
trap.
We are of course not to be limited to a portable version of a ball
trap, for permanent installations may be utilized. If a hole in the
ground or other playing surface is utilized, we prefer for the
opening to be approximately of a 10 or 11 inch diameter in order to
provide a realistic test of putting skills.
* * * * *