U.S. patent number 3,918,139 [Application Number 05/487,074] was granted by the patent office on 1975-11-11 for mcraly type coating alloy.
This patent grant is currently assigned to United Technologies Corporation. Invention is credited to Edward J. Felten.
United States Patent |
3,918,139 |
Felten |
November 11, 1975 |
**Please see images for:
( Certificate of Correction ) ** |
MCrAlY type coating alloy
Abstract
There is described nickel, cobalt and nickel-cobalt alloy
coating compositions having improved hot corrosion resistance. In
particular, an improved MCrAlY type alloy coating composition
consists essentially of, by weight, approximately 8-30 percent
chromium, 5-15 percent aluminum, up to 1 percent reactive metal
selected from the group consisting of yttrium, scandium, thorium
and the other rare earth elements and 3-12 percent of a noble metal
selected from the group consisting of platinum or rhodium, the
balance being selected from the group consisting of nickel, cobalt
and nickel-cobalt.
Inventors: |
Felten; Edward J. (Cheshire,
CT) |
Assignee: |
United Technologies Corporation
(Hartford, CT)
|
Family
ID: |
23934299 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/487,074 |
Filed: |
July 10, 1974 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
428/655; 420/444;
428/670; 428/656; 428/680 |
Current CPC
Class: |
C22C
19/00 (20130101); C22C 19/058 (20130101); C23C
30/00 (20130101); F01D 5/288 (20130101); Y10T
428/12875 (20150115); Y10T 428/12944 (20150115); Y02T
50/60 (20130101); Y10T 428/12771 (20150115); Y10T
428/12778 (20150115) |
Current International
Class: |
C23C
30/00 (20060101); F01D 5/28 (20060101); C22C
19/00 (20060101); C22C 19/05 (20060101); B32B
015/04 (); C22C 019/00 () |
Field of
Search: |
;29/194
;75/171,170,134F |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Rutledge; L. Dewayne
Assistant Examiner: Weise; E. L.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Del Ponti; John D.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. In a coating composition of the MCrAlY type wherein the coating
composition consists essentially of, by weight, approximately 8-30
percent chromium, 5-15 percent aluminum, up to 1 percent reactive
metal selected from the group consisting of yttrium, scandium,
thorium and the other rare earth elements, balance selected from
the group consisting of nickel, cobalt and nickel-cobalt, the
improvement for increasing hot corrosion resistance which comprises
3-12 percent of a noble metal selected from the group consisting of
platinum and rhodium as an alloying ingredient.
2. The invention of claim 1 wherein said reactive metal is
yttrium.
3. The invention of claim 2 wherein said noble metal is 5-10
percent platinum.
4. The invention of claim 2 wherein said noble metal is 5 percent
rhodium.
5. A coated article comprising a nickel-base or cobalt-base
superalloy, and an overlay coating thereon of the MCrAlY type
wherein the coating composition consists essentially of, by weight,
approximately 8-30 percent chromium, 5-15 percent aluminum, up to 1
percent reactive metal selected from the group consisting of
yttrium, scandium, thorium and the other rare earth elements, 3-12
percent of a noble metal selected from the group consisting of
platinum or rhodium, balance selected from the group consisting of
nickel, cobalt and nickel-cobalt, said platinum or rhodium being
substantially uniformly dispersed throughout said overlay
coating.
6. The invention of claim 5 wherein said reactive metal is
yttrium.
7. The invention of claim 6 wherein said noble metal is 5-10
percent platinum.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to alloys and more particularly to
nickel, cobalt or nickel-cobalt coating alloys having improved hot
corrosion resistance.
It is known that the modern day jet engine super-alloys are
susceptible to oxidation-erosion and hot corrosion at very high
temperatures and that it is the usual practice to coat the
superalloys with a composition different from and more
oxidation-erosion and corrosion resistant than the substrate
alloy.
In general, there are two primary types of coatings: (1) aluminide
coatings, such as those described in the patent to Joseph U.S. Pat.
No. 3,102,044 or the patents to Bungardt et al. U.S. Pat. No.
3,677,789 and U.S. Pat. No. 3,692,554 wherein aluminides are formed
by a reaction with, or diffusion of a coating on, the substrate
surface, and (2) overlay coatings such as those of the MCrAlY type,
e.g., NiCrAlY described in the patent to Goward et al. U.S. Pat.
No. 3,754,903, CoCrAlY described in the patent to Evans et al. U.S.
Pat. No. 3,676,085, NiCoCrAlY described in the patent application
to Hecht et al. Ser. No. 469,186 filed May 13, 1974 and FeCrAlY
described in the patent to Talboom, Jr. et al. U.S. Pat. No.
3,542,530. Particularly useful overlay MCrAlY coatings are those
consisting essentially of, by weight, approximately 8-30 percent
chromium, 5-15 percent aluminum, up to 1 percent reactive metal
selected from the group consisting of yttrium, scandium, thorium
and lanthanum and the other rare earth elements, balance selected
from the group consisting of nickel, cobalt and nickel-cobalt,
preferably applied to a thickness of approximately 0.005-0.006
inch.
In contrast to the overlay coatings, the diffusion aluminide
coatings are typically provided by reacting aluminum with the
deoxidized surface of the article to be protected -- the aluminide
layer being formed as a barrier zone of varying component
concentration with consumption of the substrate components. This
aluminide layer in turn oxidizes to form the inert barrier oxide.
In the Bungardt et al patents, a separate layer of metal from the
platinum group is applied before the aluminum diffusion treatment.
However, because of the complex nature of most of the contemporary
alloys, and because the coating composition thereon is derived in
part from the components of the substrate alloys, it is difficult
to control the coating composition so as to cause the formation of
a suitable barrier oxide. In addition, it is inherent in the
diffusion technique that the coating formed is nonhomogeneous and,
with respect to platinum group metal content for example, there
appears a high concentration of the platinum group metal on the
surface. The existence of such a gradient, of course, is
disadvantageous since, with use, the coating diminishes in
effectiveness as its composition changes.
Although the prior art coating compositions have represented
improvements over various of their predecessor alloy compositions,
the need for further improvements, particularly for example, in hot
corrosion resistance, has remained.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention contemplates alloy compositions and more
particularly nickel, cobalt and nickel-cobalt coating alloy
compositions having improved hot corrosion resistance. In
particular, the present invention contemplates an improved MCrAlY
type alloy coating composition consisting essentially of, by
weight, approximately 8-30 percent chromium, 5-15 percent aluminum,
up to 1 percent reactive metal selected from the group consisting
of yttrium, scandium, thorium and the other rare earth elements,
and 3-12 percent of a noble metal selected from the group
consisting of platinum or rhodium, the balance being selected from
the group consisting of nickel, cobalt and nickel-cobalt. As will
be appreciated, the inclusion of the noble metal as an alloying
ingredient results in a substantially uniform dispersion thereof
throughout the composition and thus retains the homogeneity which
is characteristic of MCrAlY type overlay coatings.
In a preferred embodiment, the reactive metal is yttrium and the
noble metal is 5-10 percent platinum. In another embodiment, the
reactive metal is yttrium and the noble metal is 5 percent
rhodium.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
An understanding of the invention will become more apparent to
those skilled in the art by reference to the following detailed
description when viewed in light of the accompanying drawings,
wherein:
FIG. 1 is a graph depicting the sulfidation behavior of various
NiCrAl alloys at 1,000.degree.C;
FIGS. 2 and 3 are graphs depicting the oxidation behavior of
various NiCrAl alloys at 1,100.degree.C and 1,200.degree.C
respectively, in air;
FIG. 4 is a graph showing the hot corrosion behavior of various
CoCrAlY and NiCrAlY alloys at 1,750.degree.F -- 2.0 mg
cm.sup.-.sup.2 Na.sub.2 SO.sub.4 ; and
FIG. 5 is a graph showing the hot corrosion behavior of NiCrAlY
alloys at 1,750.degree.F -- 0.5 mg cm.sup.-.sup.2 Na.sub.2
SO.sub.4.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
The alloys of the present invention exhibit markedly improved hot
corrosion resistance and are considered particularly useful as
coatings on the contemporary superalloys. The inventive alloys are
in themselves corrosion resistant and do not depend for their
protective effect upon a reaction with the substrate material. In
addition, these alloys are uniform throughout their thickness and
thus will exhibit their protective properties more continuously and
consistently than do the aluminide coatings.
The desired results are obtained with a basic alloy containing
approximately, by weight, 8-30 percent chromium, 5-15 percent
aluminum, 5-10 percent platinum or rhodium, up to 1 percent
reactive metal selected from the group consisting of yttrium,
scandium, thorium and lanthanum and the other rare earth elements,
balance nickel and/or cobalt. A preferred alloy composition
utilizes 0.5 percent yttrium and 5-10 percent platinum.
It was surprising to find that the addition, as alloying
ingredients, of specified amounts of platinum or rhodium to the
MCrAlY type coatings would not only greatly enhance sulfidation
resistance but also, even without the presence of the reactive
metals (Y, Sc, Th, La and the other rare earths) which normally
provide oxide adherence to the underlying substrate, would promote
additional oxide adherence.
With respect to the processes whereby the alloy may be applied as a
coating to the surface to be protected, the presence of platinum or
rhodium to the coating alloy, because of the low vapor pressure of
platinum or rhodium, generally precludes use of the vapor
deposition technique. Other techniques are, however, efficacious to
obtaining the properly composed coating. It is recognized, for
example, that the coatings may be deposited by using a process
involving simultaneous vapor deposition of the MCrAlY and sputter
deposition of platinum or rhodium. As an alternative, the coatings
may be accomplished by plasma spraying techniques.
A better understanding of the invention will result when viewed in
light of the following examples:
EXAMPLE 1
Alloys of Ni-Al Cr-6A with alloying additions of platinum and
rhodium were made by the conventional arc melt-drop cast technique.
Specimens of the compositions depicted in the graph of FIG. 1 had
dimensions of 1 cm .times. 1 cm .times. .about. 0.2 cm and were
subjected to hot corrosion tests as follows. Specimens of the
alloys were spray coated with an aqueous solution of Na.sub.2
SO.sub.4, dried and weighed. After achieving a coating of 0.5 mg
cm.sup.-.sup.2 Na.sub.2 SO.sub.4, they were oxidized for 20 hours
at 1,000.degree.C in one atmosphere O.sub.2 in a thermal balance.
The specimen weight was recorded continuously as a function of time
with the weight changes converted to weight gain per unit surface
area and shown in FIG. 1.
As can be seen, the addition of 2.5 weight percent Pt did not
significantly improve the performance of the Ni-8Cr-6Al alloy in
this test. However a significant improvement in performance was
obtained when 5 or 10 weight percent Pt was added. Specimens of the
Ni-8Cr-6Al- 5Rh alloy were approximately equivalent to that of the
10 Pt alloy.
EXAMPLE 2
Specimens were formed as in Example 1 to the compositions as shown
in FIGS. 2 and 3. The specimens were subjected to high temperature
cyclic oxidation tests and surprisingly, those containing platinum
or rhodium, were found to have improved oxide adherence of the
Al.sub. 2 O.sub.3 formed on the alloys. It can be seen that the
alloys with 5 or 10 weight percent Pt are superior to the 2.5
weight percent Pt alloy which, in turn, is significantly better
than the unmodified alloy. Oxide adherence on a Ni-8Cr-6Al- 5Rh
alloy at 1,200.degree.C was found to be equivalent to that of the
Ni-8Cr-6Al- 10Pt alloy at the same temperature.
EXAMPLE 3
Alloy specimens having dimensions of 1 cm .times. 0.8 cm .times.
0.1-0.2 cm and compositions of Ni-17Cr-12Al- 0.5Y, Ni-17Cr-12Al-
5Rh-0.5Y, Ni-17Cr-12Al- 10Pt-0.5Y, Co-17Cr-11Al- 0.5Y,
Co-17Cr-11Al- 5Rh-0.5Y and Co-17Cr-11Al- 10Pt-0.5Y were prepared,
measured and weighed, then coated with 0.5-2.0 mg/cm.sup.2 Na.sub.2
SO.sub.4. They were then subjected to up to 14 cycles, each cycle
consisting of oxidizing in air for 20 hours at 1,750.degree.F,
cooling to room temperature, washing and reweighing. The sequence
was repeated to failure. The results obtained for one set of
experiments at 1,750.degree.F using 2 mg/cm.sup.2 of salt is
illustrated in FIG. 4. Although CoCrAlY is basically more resistant
to hot corrosion than is NiCrAlY, it can be seen that additions of
either Pt or Rh to either CoCrAlY, or NiCrAlY dramatically improve
their hot corrosion resistance.
EXAMPLE 4
Erosion bars of Ni-17Cr-12Al-0.5Y, Ni-17Cr-12Al-5Rh-0.5Y,
Ni-17Cr-12Al-5Pt-0.5Y and Ni-17Cr-12Al-10Pt-O.5Y were evaluated in
a cyclic hot corrosion burner rig at 1,750.degree.F using 35 ppm of
sea salt ingested in the fuel prior to combustion. Severe attack of
the tip of both the NiCrAlY base composition and the rhodium
modified composition occurred after 110 hours. Hot zone failures
were observed between 300 and 400 hours for both these bars, the
rhodium modified specimen surviving for a slightly longer time than
the base composition. Although the rhodium modified composition
showed little improvement over the base alloy in this test, the
nature of its failure was unusual and rendered these results
somewhat dubious and inconclusive. In contrast, the platinum
modified compositions were found to be dramatically more resistant
to hot corrosion than the base composition. For these compositions
no sign of failure was observed up to 675 hours, when testing was
terminated.
What has been set forth above is intended primarily as exemplary to
enable those skilled in the art in the practice of the invention
and it should therefore be understood that, within the scope of the
appended claims, the invention may be practiced in other ways than
as specifically described.
* * * * *