Dry cleaning various articles

Neel , et al. September 23, 1

Patent Grant 3907496

U.S. patent number 3,907,496 [Application Number 05/469,364] was granted by the patent office on 1975-09-23 for dry cleaning various articles. This patent grant is currently assigned to Societe Rhone-Progil. Invention is credited to Jean Neel, Bernard Papillon.


United States Patent 3,907,496
Neel ,   et al. September 23, 1975

Dry cleaning various articles

Abstract

A bath for dry cleaning solid articles, consisting essentially of at least one usual hydrocarbon dry cleaning solvent having 2 to 8 carbon atoms, which contains per liter 0.5 to 50 grams of water, 1 to 20 grams of isopropylamine-dodecylbenzene sulfonate, and 0.05 to 10 grams of a copolymer of at least 10 moles of a first monomer selection from the group consisting of methacrylic acid with at most 90 moles of a second monomer and consisting of alkyl acrylate and alkyl methacrylate the alkyl of which has 1 to 8 atoms, the molecular weight of the copolymer being 2,000 to 100,000.


Inventors: Neel; Jean (Lyon, FR), Papillon; Bernard (Lyon-La-Mulatiere, FR)
Assignee: Societe Rhone-Progil (Paris, FR)
Family ID: 9070412
Appl. No.: 05/469,364
Filed: May 13, 1974

Related U.S. Patent Documents

Application Number Filing Date Patent Number Issue Date
218021 Jan 14, 1972

Foreign Application Priority Data

Jan 18, 1971 [FR] 71.01434
Current U.S. Class: 8/142; 510/290; 510/476; 510/342; 510/361; 510/287
Current CPC Class: D06F 43/007 (20130101); D06L 1/04 (20130101)
Current International Class: D06F 43/00 (20060101); D06L 1/00 (20060101); D06L 1/04 (20060101); D06l 001/00 ()
Field of Search: ;8/142

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
1976679 October 1934 Fikentscher
2669546 January 1971 Galven et al.
3310409 March 1967 Michael et al.
3310498 March 1967 Michael et al.
3523088 August 1970 Dean et al.
3535258 October 1970 Sabatelli
3628911 December 1971 Grunevalder
Primary Examiner: Levy; Donald
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Blodgett; Norman S. Blodgett; Gerry A.

Parent Case Text



This is a continuation, of application Ser. No. 218,021 filed Jan. 14, 1972, now abandoned.
Claims



We claim:

1. A bath for dry cleaning solid articles, consisting essentially of at least one usual hydrocarbon dry cleaning solvent having 2 to 8 carbon atoms, which contains per liter 0.5 to 50 grams of water, 1 to 20 grams of isopropylamine-dodecyl-benzene sulfonate, and 0.05 to 10 grams of a copolymer of at least 10 moles of a first monomer selection from the group consisting of acrylic acid and methacrylic acid with at most 90 moles of a second monomer and consisting of alkyl acrylate and alkyl methacrylate the alkyl of which has 1 to 8 carbon atoms, the molecular weight of the copolymer being 2,000 to 100,000.

2. Bath according to claim 1, wherein said solvent is trichloroethylene.

3. Bath according to claim 1, wherein said solvent is perchloroethylene.

4. Bath according to claim 1, wherein said copolymer is formed by about 50 moles of acrylic acid with 50 moles of isopropyl acrylate, the molecular weight of the copolymer being in the range of 5,000 to 50,000.

5. Bath according to claim 4, wherein said solvent is trichloroethylene.

6. Bath according to claim 4, wherein said solvent is perchloroethylene.

7. A bath for dry cleaning solid articles, consisting essentially of at least one usual hydrocarbon dry cleaning solvent having 2 to 8 carbon atoms, which contains per liter 0.5 to 50 grams of water, 1 to 20 grams of a surface active agent which is isopropyl-amine dodecyl-benzene sulfonate, and 0.05 to 10 grams of a copolymer of 50 moles of acrylic acid with 50 moles of isopropyl acrylate.

8. A bath for dry cleaning solid articles, consisting essentially of at least one usual hydrocarbon dry cleaning solvent which is trichloroethylene, which contains per liter 0.5 to 50 grams of water, 1 to 20 grams of a surface active agent selected from the group consisting of amine alkyl-aryl-sulfonates, and 0.05 to 10 grams of a copolymer of at least 10 moles of a first monomer selection from the group consisting of acrylic acid and methacrylic acid with at most 90 moles of a second monomer and consisting of alkyl acrylate and alkyl methacrylate the alkyl of which has 1 to 8 carbon atoms, the molecular weight of the copolymer being 5,000 to 50,000.

9. A bath for dry cleaning solid articles, consisting essentially of at least one usual hydrocarbon dry cleaning solvent which is perchloroethylene, which contains per liter 0.5 to 50 grams of water, 1 to 20 grams of a surface active agent selected from the group consisting of amine alkyl-aryl-sulfonates, and 0.05 to 10 grams of a copolymer of at least 10 moles of a first monomer selection from the group consisting of acrylic acid and methacrylic acid with at most 90 moles of a second monomer and consisting of alkyl acrylate and alkyl methacrylate the alkyl of which has 1 to 8 carbon atoms, the molecular weight of the copolymer being 5,000 to 50,000.
Description



The invention relates to an improvement to dry-cleaning various articles, inter alia textile articles, i.e. the washing of textile or other fibres or articles with nonaqueous solvents. The invention relates more particularly to the use of a novel kind of adjuvant which improves cleaning and gives better stain removal and whiteness. Accordingly, the invention comprises a novel agent which prevents soil redeposition on an article from which stains have been removed in an organic solvent bath. The invention also relates to baths containing the aforementioned agent.

Dry-cleaning is very widely used at present, and its usefulness is becoming more evident every day. Whether, the solvent used is dry or contains a little water, it is usually necessary to add surface-active agents soluble in the given solvent to the cleaning bath, in order to improve stain removal. It has thus become conventional to mix the solvents with intensifiers, more particularly agents such as amine alkyl-aryl-sulphonates ethoxylated derivatives or amines or of aliphatic alcohols, or alkyl-polyethoxy phenols. In spite of these admixtures, which are often accompanied by optical bluing agents and bleaching agents, the degree of stain removal or whiteness of washed articles is often reduced because dirt in the baths is redeposited on the washing. To obviate this disadvantage, the invention provides a novel means which can give much better cleaning than can be obtained with conventional baths.

The novel anti-redeposition agent for dry-cleaning baths comprises one or more polymers of acrylic or methacrylic acid or a copolymer of one of the aforementioned acids with an acrylic or methacrylic ester which is soluble in or at least swells considerably in water.

Usually, the esters which can form copolymers with acrylic and/or methacrylic acids, are aliphatic; in practice they are usually alkyl esters containing from 1 to 8 carbon atoms and, more particularly, methyl, ethyl, propyl, isopropyl, butyl, isobutyl and tert-butyl acrylates and/or methacrylates.

In order to satisfy the required conditions of solubility or at least of adequate swelling in water, the polymers according to the invention preferably have a molecular weight of between 2,000 and 100,000, or preferably between 5,000 and 50,000.

When the agent is a copolymer of an acid with an ester, there should be at least 10 molecules of acrylic and/or methacrylic acid per 100 molecules of monomer which it contains.

Since the preparation of acrylic homopolymers and copolymers is well known, it will not be described here.

It has unexpectedly been found that the aforementioned polymers, when added in small proportions to dry-cleaning baths, are very effective in preventing soil redeposition, when the bath contains a small proportion of water, e.g. up to 100 g H.sub.2 O per liter of solvent.

It is found that acrylic polymers according to the invention containing from 10 to 100 acid groups per 100 acrylic or methacrylic groups have the most effective anti-redeposition action when the organic solvent contains between 0.5 and 50 g of water per liter.

Preferably, the adjuvant according to the invention is used with one or more other additives of known kind, inter alia with cleaning intensifiers. Usually the proportion of the adjuvant is small compared with the proportion of intensifier; it may be e.g. as low as 1% of the weight of the intensifier and is preferably between 2 and 20%. Compared with the quantity of solvent, the quantity of the adjuvant according to the invention may advantageously vary between 0.05 and 10 gliter; of course, these figures are approximate and the proportion may vary outside the afore-mentioned limits depending on the nature of the solvent, the water content, the nature and proportion of the intensifier and the particular nature of the chosen anti-redeposition agent.

Very advantageously, known amine alkyl-aryl-sulphonates may be associated with the acrylic homopolymers or copolymers according to the invention.

The agents according to the invention can be used with all solvents commonly used for dry-cleaning, inter alia chlorinated, fluorinated or chlorofluorinated hydrocarbons, more particularly aliphatic hydrocarbons, and especially trichloroethylene and perchloroethylene; benzene hydrocarbons, inter alia benzene, toluene or xylene; or aliphatic hydrocarbons such as hexane, heptane, octane, petroleum distillate, petroleum ether, etc.

The agents according to the invention can be used in cold or hot cleaning and are of use in all known methods of cleaning with organic solvents, provided that the latter contain a certain proportion of water as explained hereinbefore.

The invention is non-limitatively illustrated in the following examples.

GENERAL METHOD OF OPERATION

In all the examples, the bath comprised 500 ml perchloroethylene in which the quantities stated in each example of the intensifier and acrylic polymer according to the invention had been dissolved. Cleaning was performed at 22.degree.C for 30 minutes, with agitation at 150 reciprocations per minute. The operations were performed in a machine known as a "Tergotometer" (standardised), containing 4 tubs for making 4 tests simultaneously.

In each test, a strip of cotton fabric measuring 13 .times. 21 cm which had been artificially soiled (EMPA soil of Fabric Incorporated (New York)) was treated in the presence of a clean strip of the same cloth.

After cleaning, the whiteness of the previously soiled strip and of the accompanying clean strip were determined in known manner with an Elrepho apparatus having a number 8 filter. The whiteness of the first strip after washing shows the degree of cleaning, whereas the whiteness of the second strip shows the extent to which soil redeposition has been reduced. In the following examples, use is made of the two aforementioned parameters and their sum is also noted, since this is important in showing the total effect of the adjuvant tested.

The following abbreviations are used in the examples:

Ts: soiled cloth

Tp: clean cloth

Dbsi: isopropylamine-dodecyl-benzene sulphonate

Absa: another amine aryl alkyl sulphonate

Gil: an agent according to the invention comprising a copolymer of 50 mols of acrylic acid with 50 mls of isopropyl acrylate and having a molecular weight of approx. 10,000.

EXAMPLES 1 to 5

The perchloroethylene bath contained 6 g of water per liter and 5 g/l of an intensifier, which was DBSI in Examples 1 to 3 and ABSA in Examples 4 and 5. In a first series of tests, the measured whiteness was as follows: EXAMPLES WHITENESS No. TS TP Total ______________________________________ 1 DBSI 59.2 65.3 124.5 2 DBSI + 0.3 g/l GIL 63.7 77.- 140.7 3 DBSI + 0.05 g/l GIL 59.5 72.5 132.0 4 ABSA 61.- 69.- 130.- 5 ABSA + 0.3 g/l GIL 61.8 75.4 137.2 ______________________________________

As can be seen, the addition of small quantities of GIL acrylic polymer according to the invention substantially improves the whiteness of the clean fabric in the presence of a conventional amine alkyl-aryl-sulphonate.

EXAMPLES 6 to 10

Washing tests similar to those of Examples 1 to 5 were made using 10 g of water and 5 g of intensifier per liter of solvent. The observed results were as follows:

EXAMPLES WHITENESS No. TS TP Total ______________________________________ 6 DBSI 65.- 65.5 130.5 7 DBSI + 0.3 g/l GIL 67.2 79.6 146.8 8 DBSI + 0.1 g/l GIL 67.7 78.- 145.7 9 ABSA 64.- 72.- 136.- 10 ABSA + 0.3 g/l GIL 64.4 80.7 145.1 ______________________________________

These results, by comparison with Examples 1 to 5, show that an increase in the water content is accompanied by an increase in the antiredeposition effect of the adjuvant according to the invention.

EXAMPLES 11 to 16

Tests were made using a still larger content of water, i.e. 20 g per liter of solvent, all the other conditions remaining the same as in the preceding examples.

______________________________________ EXAMPLES WHITENESS No. TS TP Total ______________________________________ 11 DBSI 71.5 80.6 152.1 12 DBSI + 0.3 g/l GIL 71.3 84.- 155.3 13 DBSI + 0.1 g/l GIL 73.8 83.6 157.4 14 DBSI + 0.05 g/l GIL 72.5 82.- 154.5 15 ABSA 68.3 78.- 146.3 16 ABSA + 0.3 g/l GIL 71.4 83.5 154.9 ______________________________________

Example 13, compared with the other results, shows that the optimum content of GIL acrylic polymer was about 0.1 g/l under the test conditions.

* * * * *


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed