U.S. patent number 3,886,277 [Application Number 05/359,046] was granted by the patent office on 1975-05-27 for methods of controlling dandruff using 5,7-dichloro-8-hydroxy quinoline.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Hans Schwarzkopf GmbH. Invention is credited to Volker Bollert, Friedhelm Galle, Heinz Lukesch, Gertrud Muller, Rudolf Randebrock, Ludwig Rappen.
United States Patent |
3,886,277 |
Randebrock , et al. |
May 27, 1975 |
Methods of controlling dandruff using 5,7-dichloro-8-hydroxy
quinoline
Abstract
A method and composition for controlling dandruff on the human
scalp using 5,7-dichlor-8-hydroxy quinoline or a salt thereof.
Inventors: |
Randebrock; Rudolf
(Hamburg-Othmarschen, DT), Bollert; Volker (Hamburg,
DT), Lukesch; Heinz (Hamburg-Sasel, DT),
Muller; Gertrud (Hamburg, DT), Rappen; Ludwig
(Diusburg-Meiderich, DT), Galle; Friedhelm
(Duisberg-Hamborn, DT) |
Assignee: |
Hans Schwarzkopf GmbH (Hamburg,
DT)
|
Family
ID: |
27212359 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/359,046 |
Filed: |
May 10, 1973 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
100447 |
Dec 21, 1970 |
|
|
|
|
659613 |
Aug 10, 1967 |
|
|
|
|
Foreign Application Priority Data
Current U.S.
Class: |
514/311; 514/852;
510/127; 510/388; 510/505; 510/119 |
Current CPC
Class: |
A61K
8/4926 (20130101); A61Q 5/006 (20130101); A61Q
5/12 (20130101); A61K 31/47 (20130101); A61Q
5/02 (20130101); Y10S 514/852 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
A61K
31/47 (20060101); A61k 027/00 (); A01n
009/22 () |
Field of
Search: |
;424/70,245,258,DIG.4
;167/87AD ;252/106,107 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
2695881 |
November 1954 |
Elliott et al. |
3100175 |
August 1963 |
Bourquin et al. |
|
Foreign Patent Documents
Other References
Wendlandt et al., Chem. Abst., Vol. 57, p. 9195, (1962). .
Schraufstatter, Chem. Abst., Vol. 44, p. 8999, (1950). .
American Perfumer & Cosmetics, Vol. 78, No. 10, p. 60, Oct.
1963. .
Bahal et al., Journal of Pharmaceutical Science, Vol. 50, No. 2,
Feb. 1969, pp. 127-130..
|
Primary Examiner: Meyers; Albert T.
Assistant Examiner: Robinson; Allen J.
Parent Case Text
This application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 100,447,
filed Dec. 21, 1970, which in turn is a continuation-in-part of
application Ser. No. 659,613, filed Aug. 10, 1967, now abandoned.
Claims
1. A method of controlling the formation of visible dandruff
comprising applying to the hair and scalp of humans affected
therewith a composition comprising a non-toxic pharmaceutically
acceptable carrier and 5,7-dichlor-8-hydroxy quinoline in an amount
sufficient to provide
2. The method of claim 1, in which the composition contains from
0.05 to
3. The method of claim 1 in which the composition contains from
0.01 to
4. The method of claim 1 in which the composition contains from 0.5
to 2.0%
5. A method of controlling the formation of visible dandruff
comprising shampooing the hair and scalp of humans affected
therewith with an anionic, cationic or amphoteric detergent
composition containing 5,7-dichlor-8-hydroxy quinoline in an amount
sufficient to provide
6. The method of claim 5, in which the composition contains from
0.05 to
7. The method of claim 5 in which the composition contains from 0.1
to 5.0%
8. The method of claim 5 in which the composition contains from 0.5
to 2.0%
9. The method of claim 5 in which the hair and scalp of humans is
shampooed
10. The method of claim 9 in which the 5 to 20 grams is applied in
two
11. The method of claim 9 in which shampooing is conducted twice
each week for 2 weeks, and once each week for the next 4 weeks.
Description
The present invention relates to a method and composition for
controlling dandruff on the human scalp by using
5,7-dichlor-8-hydroxy quinoline, or a salt thereof.
The human skin constantly renews itself, casting off parts of the
old skin. These particles of skin, known as dandruff, cannot be
seen with the naked eye when the formation is normal. In normal
cases, the formation of dandruff on the skin occurs practically
invisibly. In many cases, however, especially on the skin of the
scalp, the formation of dandruff takes place with formation of
large pieces which may be seen with the naked eye and which, from
the cosmetic point of view, are regarded as extremely unpleasant.
When the hair is combed, the dandruff falls upon the clothing,
giving the impression of a lack in hygiene. Thus, one of the aims
in caring for the hair is to control the formation of visible
dandruff.
Many agents have been suggested for the purpose. For example,
mention has been made of the use of substances exhibiting
bacteriostatic and fungistatic properties as agents for controlling
dandruff. Such substances are, for example, phenols, resorcine,
hexachlorophene, or 2,2'-thio-bis-dichlorophenol, carbanilides such
as, for example, 3,4,4'-trichlorosalicylic anilide, quaternary
ammonium compounds such as cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide,
organic metal compounds such as, for example, phenyl-mercury
acetate, hydroxy quinolines such as, for example,
5-iodine-8-hydroxy quinoline, or 5-chlor-7-iodine-8-hydroxy
quinoline, pyridine thiones such as 2-pyridone thione-N-oxide,
especially the zinc salt thereof,
N-trichlormethylmercapto-4-cyclohexene-1,2-carboximide,
dialkyl-polythio-ether-dicarbonic acids such as, for example, the
disulphide of B-mercaptopropionic acid, and undecylenic
acid-monoethanolamide. In Australian Pat. No. 246,452 of August 2,
1963, the use of 5,7-diiodo-8-hydroxy quinoline as a dandruff
controlling agent is described.
There was thought to be a connection between the bacterial flora of
the scalp skin and the onset of visible dandruff. Recent work,
however, causes this finding to appear as very doubtful, since it
has been impossible to demonstrate any clear differences between
the bacterial flora in a scalp skin with visible dandruff and one
with normal invisible dandruff. Thus the action of certain
bacteriostatic and fungistatic substances cannot, in the present
state of the art, be explained simply by the said properties of
these substances. The effective action of sulphur, sulphur
compounds, and selenium compounds against dandruff shows that other
assumptions for effective action against visible dandruff may be
significant. For example, sodium selenite, which is effective
against dandruff, exhibits scarcely any bacteriostatic action. This
may be seen in Table 1, which shows the limit of dilution in g/ml
at which germ inhibition is to be observed in an aqueous
solution.
TABLE 1 ______________________________________ Staph. Escheri-
Candida aureus chia albicans "Oxford"
______________________________________ Sodium Selenite 500 500 500
Cetyl Trimethyl- Ammonium Bromide 2 15 8
______________________________________
For purposes of comparison, Table 1 shows the bacteriostatic action
of cetyl-trimethyl-ammonium bromide.
Determination of the limiting bacteriostatic action was carried out
by the tube-series dilution test.
Control of dandruff by the above-mentioned substances, which have
scarcely any bacteriostatic action, is frequently ascribed to their
keratolytic action. However, accurate data in this connection has
not hitherto been available, and precise information regarding the
mechanism of these compounds in combatting dandruff attack cannot
be given.
It has now been found, according to the invention, that among the
large class of chemical compounds having bacteriostatic and
fungistatic action, there are to be found certain compounds which
have a specific action against dandruff in addition to the said
bacteriostatic and fungistatic action.
These compounds are 5,7-dichlor-8-hydroxy quinoline and the salts
thereof. Among the salts, the salts with elements of the first,
second and third main groups, and the second and fifth secondary
groups of the periodic system are particularly advantageous. The
preferred salts are those with calcium, bismuth, aluminium and
zinc. The aluminium salt is particularly preferred.
These compounds meet all of the requirements for an additive to
agents for the care of the hair, whether they be shampoos or hair
treatments.
These requirements are:
Constant action after long storage, especially in the presence of
detergent substances such as are used in shampoos and hair
treatments.
Substantivity of the additive on the scalp and hair, to ensure
lasting effect between shampoos or treatments.
Satisfactory compatibility with the skin and, finally, with all
substances used in making up shampoos and hair treatments.
Retention of full bacteriostatic action after long storage and in
the presence of detergent substances was demonstrated by the
tube-series dilution test. The values in Table II show a very
satisfactory action by 5,7-dichlor-8-hydroxy quinoline and its
salts in shampoos.
TABLE II
__________________________________________________________________________
Staphy- Staphy- Coryne- Escher- Pityro- Candida lococc- lococc-
bact. ichia sporon albicans us us pseudo- Coli ovale aureus epider-
diphth mis
__________________________________________________________________________
Shampoo no inh- no inh- no inh- no inh- no inh- no inh- A ibition
ibition ibition ibition ibition ibition diluted 1:10 Shampoo B
1:2.sup.1 no inh- 1:4 no inh- no inh- 1:2 diluted ibition ibition
ibition 1:10 Shampoo A +2% 5,7- 1:256 1:512 1:1024 1:256 1:512
1:512 Dichlor- 8-hydro- oxyquin- oline diluted 1:10 Shampoo B +2%
5,7- 1:128 1:512 1:512 1:512 1:512 1:512 Dichlor- 8-hydr- oxyquin-
oline diluted 1:10 Shampoo A +2% Bis- muth Salt 1:256 1:256 1:1024
1:512 1:256 1:512 of 5,7- Dichlor- 8-hydr- oxyquin- oline diluted
1:10 Shampoo B +2% Ca- 1:512 1:512 1:1024 1:512 1:256 1:256 Salt of
5,7-Dic- hlor-8- hydroxy- quinoline diluted 1:10 Shampoo A +2%
Bact- 1:64 1:16 1:16 1:8 1:8 1:16 erosan .sup.2 diluted 1:10
Shampoo B +2% Bact- 1:16 1:8 1:8 1:16 1:8 1:16 erosan diluted 1:10
__________________________________________________________________________
.sup.1 The numbers show the dilution of the 1:10 diluted solutions
up to which no growth of the cultures occurs (undiluted shampoo
solutions do no show any clear change in the indicator). .sup.2
2,2'-Thio-bis(4,4'-chlorophenol).
Shampoo A 1.0 % lecithin 0.3 % stearic acid 0.3 % palmitic acid 0.1
% oleic acid 4.0 % oleic acid diethanolamide 8.0 % sodium salt of
N-lauroyl-N-methyl- amino-ethyl sulfonate (C.sub.12 H.sub.25
--CO--N--CH.sub.2 --CH.sub.2 SO.sub.3 N.sub.a) 2 CH.sub.3 (45-49%
in water) 2.0 % glycerine 1.0 % turkey-red oil 6.0 % sodium salt of
stearoyl-N-methyl- amino-ethyl sulfonate (C.sub.17 H.sub.35
--CO--N--CH.sub.2 --CH.sub.2 --SO.sub.3 N.sub.a) CH.sub.3 (50% in
water) 70.0 % sodium salt of the condensation product of C.sub.12
fatty acid and methyl taurine (45 - 49% in water) 0.6 % perfume 6.7
% desalted water Shampoo B 20.0 % Lamepon S (N-Lauroyl-potassium
amino-acetate) (C.sub.11 H.sub.23 --CO[NH--CH.sub.2 CO] 20 OK(
(35-36% in water) 40.0 % Texapon N (Lauryl-alcohol biethoxy-
sulphate (C.sub.12 H.sub.25 (O--CH.sub.2 CH.sub.2).sub.2 OSO.sub.3
N.sub.a) (28% in water) 5.0 % Medialan KP (N-Lauroyl-N-methyl-
amino-triethanolamine acetate) (C.sub.11 H.sub.23 CON--CH.sub.2
--COON(C.sub.2 H.sub.4 OH).sub.3) 0 CH.sub.3 (40% in water) 0.5 %
perfume 34.5 % desalted water
According to Table III the action of the compounds according to the
invention are also not lost after 6 months storage at
40.degree.C.
TABLE III
__________________________________________________________________________
Staphy- Staphy- Coryne- Escher- Pityro- Candida lococ- lococ- bact.
ichia sporan albicans cus cus pseudo- Coli ovale aureus epider-
diphth. mis
__________________________________________________________________________
Shampoo B +2% 5,7- dichlor- 8-hyd- 1:128 1:512 1:512 1:512 1:512
1:512 roxy quinoline; freshly prepared; diluted 1:10 with water.
Shampoo B +2% 5,7- dichlor- 8- hyd- 1:128 1:512 1:1024 1:512 1:256
1:512 roxy quinoline; stored 6 months at 40.degree.C; di- luted
1:10 with water. Shampoo A +2% bis- muth salt of 5,7- 1:256 1:256
1:1024 1:512 1:256 1:512 dichlor- 8-hyd- roxy quinoline; freshly
prepared; diluted 1:10 with water Shampoo A +2% bis- muth salt of
5,7- 1:256 1:128 1:1024 1:256 1:256 1:512 dichlor- 8-hyd- roxy
quiline; diluted 1:10 with water.*
__________________________________________________________________________
*stored 6 months at 40.degree.C. The numbers give the limiting
dilution for growth inhibition, starting with a shampoo diluted
1:10 with water. Dilution of the shampoo was carried out
immediately prior to the test. The compositions of shampoos A and B
are given in Table II.
The enduring action of 5,7-dichlor-8-hydroxy quinoline and its
salts over a period of time was demonstrated by the identifications
of germs on hair. It was found that by taking ten individual hairs
from a test subject, the same cultures were demonstrated as by
taking 100 hairs from the same test subject. Thus by taking about
10 hairs, it could be assumed with safety that practically all
cultures appearing on the hairs were covered.
Ten hairs were used in the tests at all times. The hairs were cut
with sterile shears at a maximum of 0.5 cm from the skin of the
scalp, were transferred with a sterile pipette to a sterile tube,
and were finally added to the nutrient medium. After incubating for
24 hours at 37.degree.C, sowing on blood-agar plates was carried
out, these being again incubated at 37.degree.C for 24 hours. A
qualitative determination of the cultures was then carried out.
Table IV shows the results of these tests.
TABLE IV
__________________________________________________________________________
Sample Sample Sample 3 Sample 24 Before Directly Hours After Hours
Washing After Washing After Washing Washing
__________________________________________________________________________
Test Subject Staph. Staph. Staph. Staph. 1 Washed with epidermis
epidermis epidermis; epidermis; Shampoo A Staph. phyllomanic Staph.
with No albus haem Strepto- albus haem; Additive coccen
Gramnegative Rods (Dirt Germs) Test Subject Staph. Staph. Staph.
Staph. 2 Washed with albus haem; albus haem; albus haem; albus;
Shampoo A Staph. Staph. Staph. aureus Staph. with No epidermis
epidermis haem; Staph. aureus haem; additive epidermis Staph.
epidermis Test Subject Staph. Staph. Staph. albus Staph. albus 3
Washed with albus haem; albus haem haem; Staph. haem; Staph.
Shampoo A Gramnega- aureus haem; aureus haem; with No tive Rods
Gramnegative Gramnegative additive (Dirt Germs) Rods (Dirt Rods
(Dirt Germs) Germs) Test Subject Aerobacter Staph. Aerobacter
Aerobacter 4 Washed with aerogenes; citreus aerogenes; aerogenes;
Shampoo A Staph. epi- Staph. Staph. with No dermis epidermis
epidermis additive Test Subject Bacillus Staph. albus Staph. albus
Staph. albus 5 Washed with cereus; haem haem; Staph. haem; Shampoo
A Staph. epidermis; Staph. epi- with No albus haem Pseudonomas
dermis; additive Pseudonomas Test Subject Staph. albus Staph. albus
Staph. albus 6 Washed with haem; Strept. haem haem Shampoo A + anh.
Addition of -- 2% Calcium Salt of 5,7- Dichlor-8- hydroxyquin-
oline Test Subject Staph. albus; Staph. Staph. Staph. albus 7
Washed with Strept. anh.; albus albus haem Shampoo A + Aerobacter
haem haem Addition of aerogenes 2% Calcium Salt of 5,7- Dichlor-8-
hydroxyquin- oline Test Subject Staph. albus Staph. albus Staph.
albus 8 Washed with haem; Esch. haem haem Shampoo A + coli Addition
of 2% Calcium -- Salt of 5,7- Dichlor-8- hydroxyquin- oline Test
Subject Staph. albus Staph. albus Staph. albus Staph. albus 9
Washed with haem; acrobe haem haem haem Shampoo A + Actinomy-
Addition of ceten 2% Calcium Salt of 5,7- Dichlor-8- hydroxyquin-
oline Test Subject Staph. Staph. Staph. Staph. albus 10 Wahsed
albus haem; albus haem albus haem haem; Adhesive with Shampoo
Adhesive spec. A + 2% Cal- spec. cium Salt of 5,7-Dichlor-
8-hydroxy- quinoline Test Subject Staph. Staph. Staph. 11 Washed
albus haem; albus haem albus haem with Shampoo Gramnegative A + 2%
Cal- bacilli -- cium Salt of (Air Germ) 5,7-Dichlor- 8-hydroxy-
quinoline Test Subject Gramnegative Staph. Staph. Staph. 12 Washed
bacilli albus haem albus haem albus haem with Shampoo (Dirt Germs)
A + 2% Cal- Phyllomanic cium Salt of Streptoco- 5,7-Dichlor- ccus
Staph. 8-hydroxy- alb. haem; quinoline Sarcina lutea Test Subject
Staph. Staph. Staph. Staph. 13 Washed albus haem; albus haem albus
haem albus haem with Shampoo Bac. A + 2% Cal- cereus cium Salt of
5,7-Dichlor- 8-hydroxy- quinoline
__________________________________________________________________________
The composition of Shampoos A and B are shown in Table II.
Samples of hair were taken prior to washing, immediately after
washing and three hours and 24 hours after washing. In the case of
heads washed with shampoos containing the addition according to the
invention of 5,7-dichlor-8-hydroxy quinoline, there occurred
throughout a slower resettlement than in the case of the comparison
washing without the additive of the invention.
The skin compatibility of the compounds according to the invention
is very good. By means of the "repeated-insult-patch-test" it was
proved that shampoos and hair treatments containing 2% of the
active substance of the invention produced no sensitization.
The compounds of the invention may be applied to the hair and scalp
in any non-toxic pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, and in
particular in compositions normally used for application to the
hair such as shampoos, hair conditioners, hair tonics and hair
creams.
It is particularly advantageous to use the compounds in combination
with a detergent. The detergent can be anionic, cationic or
amphoteric. Anionic detergents include both soap and non-soap
detergents. Suitable soap detergents are the sodium, potassium,
ammonium and alkanolammonium salts of higher fatty acids. When used
in a detergent composition, the detergent acts as a wetting agent
to suspend the treatment agent in the aqueous or alcoholic medium
and as an agent to facilitate washing and rinsing.
Practical application of shampoos or hairtreatment agents
containing the additive of the invention is as usual. In the case
of heavy dandruff attack, the hair should be washed at intervals of
2 - 3 days. Washing of the hair may be followed by treatment with
an additive containing treatment agent. Proof of the effectiveness
of the substances of the invention is best obtained by controlled
treatment of test subjects by the hairdresser. Particularly good
results have been obtained by tests on one side only; after a few
washings, these show the expert a clear distinction between the
differently treated halves of the head.
The treatment agent according to the invention can be used as
follows: 5,7-dichlor-8-hydroxy quinoline, or a salt of this
compound, is incorporated into a shampoo formula. In the case of
heavy dandruff attack, the head is washed with this product every
third to fourth day. In nearly all cases, the dandruff has
disappeared after the fourth or fifth washing. In order to avoid
the reoccurrence of dandruff, it is generally sufficient to wash
with the dandruff shampoo in one to two weeks. In particularly
obstinate cases, it is advisable to treat again, after washing,
with a composition containing the treatment agent of the
invention.
The amount of the treatment agent incorporated into the shampoo or
other hair treating composition used can be any amount effective
for anti-dandruff control. Good results are obtained if from 0.01
to 5.0% by weight of the treatment agent are used, preferably 0.05
to 5.0%. Particularly good results are obtained when from 0.5 to
2.0% by weight of the treatment agent are used in the
composition.
Preferably these should be used in amounts of from 5 to 20 grams of
the treatment agent for each treatment, this amount usually being
applied in two separate consecutive treatments. Preferably the
complete treatment consists of treating the hair twice a week for
the first 2 weeks and once a week for the next 4 weeks.
The following examples are given by way of describing typical usage
of the anti-dandruff additive according to the invention.
EXAMPLE 1 With a shampoo consisting of lecithin 1.0% stearic acid
0.3% palmitic acid 0.3% oleic acid 0.1% oleic-acid diethanolamide
4.0% sodium salt of N-lauroyl-N- methyl-amino-ethyl sulfonate
(C.sub.12 H.sub.25 --CO--N--CH.sub.2 --CH.sub.2 --SO.sub.3 N.sub.a)
CH.sub.3 (45-49% in water) 8.0% glycerine 2.0% Turkey-red oil 1.0%
5,7-dichlor-8-hydroxy quinoline 1.0% sodium salt of the
condensation product of C.sub.12 fatty acid and methyl taurine
(45-49% in water) 69.0% sodium salt of stearoyl-N-methyl-
amino-ethyl-sulfonate (C.sub.17 H.sub.35 - CO--N--Ch.sub.2
--CH.sub.2 --Ch.sub.2 --SO.sub.3 N.sub.a) CH.sub.3 (50% in water)
6.0% perfume 0.6% water, desalted 6.7%
the hair of 20 persons suffering from heavy dandruff attack is
washed every 3 to 4 days. After washing, the hair is well rinsed.
By way of comparison, 20 hair washings are carried out with the
same formula without the addition of 5,7-dichlor-8-hydroxy
quinoline every third to fourth day.
After the third washing, the heads washed with the shampoo
containing the additive show slightly less dandruff than those
washed with the shampoo without the additive. After five washings,
16 of the 20 heads washed with the shampoo containing the additive
are practically free of dandruff. The remaining four show
substantially less dandruff than at the start of the test washing.
The blank test made practically no improvement, i.e., several
washings with a shampoo without the addition of
5,7-dichlor-8-hydroxy quinoline did not cause the dandruff to
disappear, or even reduce it. Of the subjects treated with the
additive-containing shampoo, a group of 8 then had their hair
washed with the shampoo without the additive at intervals of 3 to 4
days, while another group of 8 persons had their hair washed again
with the additive-containing shampoo at intervals of 3 to 4 days.
After 5 to 10 washings, dandruff reoccurred in the 8 persons who
had their hair washed with the formula without the additive, while
the persons who had their hair washed with the shampoo containing
the additive remained free of dandruff.
EXAMPLE 2
The bismuth salt of 5,7-dichlor-8-hydroxy quinoline was used as the
additive. The shampoo formula was the same as that in Example 1,
but 2% of the additive is used (instead of 1% as in Example 1) and
the amount of water added is reduced to 5.7%.
Twenty persons exhibiting heavy dandruff attack had their hair
washed on one side with the aforesaid additive-containing shampoo,
and on the other side with the same formula without any additive.
After four washings at intervals of 3 to 4 days, the side washed
with the additive-containing dandruff shampoo showed a distinct
improvement, the dandruff attack having receded. After eight
washings, practically all of the sides of the heads washed with the
additive-containing shampoo were free of dandruff, while the sides
of the heads washed with the same formula without additive showed
no improvement.
______________________________________ Example 3
sodium-laurylalcohol-di-ethoxy ether sulfate 40.0% lauric acid
diethanol amide 3.0% 5,7-dichlor-8-hydroxy-aluminum quinolate 1.0%
remainder water 56.0% Example 4 triethanolamine-dodecyl benzene
sulphonate 10.0% lauroyl-methyl-amino-triethanolamine acetate 8.0%
5,7-dichlor-8-hydroxy-bismuth quinolate 1.5% remainder water 80.5%
Example 5 stearic acid 4.0% glycol distearate 4.0%
sodium-lauroyl-methyl-amino ethane sulphonate 41.0% sodium-dodecyl
benzene sulphonate 12.5% 5,7-dichlor-8-hydroxy-zinc-quinolate 3.5%
remainder water 35.0% ______________________________________
The compositions of Examples 3, 4 and 5 were used in the treatment
of the hair of persons suffering from heavy dandruff attack
following the procedures outlined above and similar results with
respect to the control of dandruff were obtained.
In all of the examples there was no indication of any toxic effect
of the compositions on the scalps of the persons treated.
In order to illustrate the superiority of the treatment agents of
this invention over known bacteriostatic agents, tests were made
using the 5,7-diiodo-8-hydroxy quinoline compound disclosed in the
Australian Pat. No. 246,452 referred to above for purposes of
comparison.
Following the disclosure of the Australian patent, the
5,7-dichlor-8-hydroxy quinoline of applicant's invention was used
in a shampoo composition similar to Example 1 of the Australian
patent, and a hair lotion composition similar to Example 14 of the
Australian patent. The four compositions used for testing are set
out in Table V below. Composition 1 is a shampoo composition
similar to Example 1 of the Australian patent containing 1.0% by
weight of the diiodo additive of the Australian patent. Composition
2 is the same shampoo composition containing 1.0% by weight of the
dichlor of applicant's invention. Composition 3 is a hair lotion
composition similar to Example 14 of the Australian patent
containing 1.0% by weight of the diiodo additive of the Australian
patent. Composition 4 is the same hair lotion composition
containing 1.0% by weight of the dichlor additive of applicant's
invention.
TABLE V ______________________________________ Composition 1
Bentonite 5.0% Alkyl aryl sulphonate 17.0% Glyceryl monoricinoleate
1.0% 5,7-Diiodo-8-hydroxyquinoline 1.0% Deionized water to 100%
Composition 2 Bentonite 5.0% Alkyl aryl sulphonate 17.0% Glyceryl
monoricinoleate 1.0% 5,7-Dichlor-8-hydroxyquinoline 1.0% Deinoized
water to 100% Composition 3 Glycerine 0.5% Ethyl alcohol 50.0%
5,7-Diiodo-8-hydroxyquinoline 0.5% Polyoxyethylene sorbitan
monolaureate 0.2% Deionized water to 100% Composition 4 Glycerine
0.5% Ethyl alcohol 50.0% 5,7-Dichlor-8-hydroxyquinoline 0.5%
Polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate 0.2% Deionized water to 100%
______________________________________
The models treated were selected according to the degree of
dandruff attack, the emphasis being placed on medium and heavy
attacks. In making the selection, care was taken to include in the
tests only persons having dandruff uniformly distributed over the
whole scalp. The selection was made in the presence of a
dermatologist. No persons suffering from diseases of the scalp were
included in the tests.
The persons tested had to undertake to refrain from using any hair
care agents for a period of 8 weeks. They were not allowed to wash
their hair for this period.
Independent appraisals were made by four judges before the hair was
washed. A total of five stages of evaluation was possible:
XXX - heavy dandruff attack XX - medium dandruff attack X - mild
dandruff attack (X) - dandruff no longer detected by person under
test; isolated flakes still found by examiner 0 - complete freedom
from dandruff
In the valuation:
XXX - was assigned 3 points XX - was assigned 2 points X - was
assigned 1 point (X) - was assigned 0.2 points 0 - was assigned 0
points
After the persons to be tested had been selected and appraised, one
of the test hairdressers made a center parting, after which the
halves of the heads were washed with shampoo compositions 1 or
2.
The hair on each side was uniformly wetted and the so-called
preliminary washing was carried out on each side. After the shampoo
had been uniformly rinsed away, the main washing was carried out.
Great care was taken to ensure that both sides received the same
treatment as regards time of action, volume of rinse, and water
temperature. After drying, each side was dressed without any
after-treatment agent.
This washing of the hair on each side was carried out twice in the
first 2 weeks and once in the next 4 weeks.
Fourteen days after the last treatment, all the hair on the head
was washed with a shampoo free of the active substance. Final
appraisal was carried out 2 weeks later.
Comparison of hair lotions was carried out as follows: prior to the
treatment, all the hair was washed with a shampoo free of the
active substance. After rinsing and drying, the hair was parted in
the middle and each side was treated with the same amount of hair
lotion compositions 3 or 4. The treatment with the hair lotion was
repeated once more in the same week without prior washing.
This method of treatment was carried out for a total of 4 weeks.
Fourteen days later the judges made their appraisal. It is easy to
see from the following table that shampoo composition 2 and hair
lotion composition 4, both of which contained the additive of
applicant's invention, were substantially more effective for all 24
persons treated (see Table VI).
TABLE VI ______________________________________ Dandruff Partly No
Eliminated Eliminated Change ______________________________________
1 9 9 6 2 17 6 1 3 10 12 2 4 19 5 --
______________________________________
In order to give additional emphasis to the results of this
practical test, it should also be mentioned that the bactericidal
and fungacidal action of the dichlor compound II is considerably
greater than that of the diiodo compound I. The following figures
show the concentration, in mg/ml, required to inhibit the growth of
the micro-organisms indicated.
TABLE VII ______________________________________ I II
______________________________________ Strept. pyrogenes 6.2 2.1
Strept. faecalis 99.2 8.6 Staph. aureaus 39.7 5.4 Escherichia coli
99.2 21.4 Asperg. niger 4.0 1.3
______________________________________
The above tests illustrate that the treatment agent of the
invention exhibits unexpectedly superior effectiveness as a
dandruff controlling agent over the additive of the Australian
patent.
* * * * *