Microbiocidal polymeric quarternary ammonium compounds

Green , et al. April 1, 1

Patent Grant 3874870

U.S. patent number 3,874,870 [Application Number 05/425,931] was granted by the patent office on 1975-04-01 for microbiocidal polymeric quarternary ammonium compounds. This patent grant is currently assigned to Millmaster Onyx Corporation. Invention is credited to Harold A. Green, John J. Merianos, Alfonso N. Petrocci.


United States Patent 3,874,870
Green ,   et al. April 1, 1975

Microbiocidal polymeric quarternary ammonium compounds

Abstract

The use of polymeric quaternary ammonium compounds prepared by the condensation of 1,4-dihalo-2-butene and 1,4-bis-dimethylamino-2-butene as microbiocidal agents in aqueous systems.


Inventors: Green; Harold A. (Havertown, PA), Merianos; John J. (Jersey City, NJ), Petrocci; Alfonso N. (Glen Rock, NJ)
Assignee: Millmaster Onyx Corporation (New York, NY)
Family ID: 23688625
Appl. No.: 05/425,931
Filed: December 18, 1973

Current U.S. Class: 504/158; 424/78.35; 514/642; 526/294
Current CPC Class: A61K 8/84 (20130101); C08G 73/0226 (20130101); A61Q 17/005 (20130101); C08G 73/0213 (20130101); A61K 8/40 (20130101); A61K 8/06 (20130101); C02F 1/50 (20130101)
Current International Class: A61K 8/72 (20060101); A61K 8/40 (20060101); A61K 8/84 (20060101); C02F 1/50 (20060101); A61K 8/30 (20060101); A61K 8/04 (20060101); A61K 8/06 (20060101); A61Q 17/00 (20060101); C08G 73/00 (20060101); C08G 73/02 (20060101); A01n 009/20 (); A01n 009/24 (); A61k 015/00 (); A61k 017/00 ()
Field of Search: ;424/78,325,329 ;260/87.5R ;71/67

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents
3140976 July 1964 Berenschot et al.
3539684 November 1970 Hoover
3771989 November 1973 Pera et al.
3778283 December 1973 Freyhold
Foreign Patent Documents
69-8949 Jul 1970 ZA
Primary Examiner: Meyers; Albert T.
Assistant Examiner: Robinson; Douglas W.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Jacobs, Esq.; Arthur A.

Claims



The invention claimed is:

1. A method of controlling the proliferation of deleterious microorganisms selected from the group consisting of bacteria and algae in an aqueous system, which comprises applying to said microorganisms a bacteriacidally or algaecidally effective amount of a condensation product formed by mixing 1,4-bisdimethylamino-2-butene dissolved in a solvent with 1,4-dihalo-2-butene at room temperature whereby an exothermic reaction is obtained causing the temperature of the mixture to rise, then maintaining the mixture at no higher than reflux temperature until the reaction is complete,

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the dihalo is dichloro.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the dihalo is dibromo.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the aqueous media is recirculated water.

5. An aqueous composition containing, as a biocidal agent, the condensation product formed by mixing 1,4-bis-dimethylamino-2-butene dissolved in a solvent with 1,4-dihalo-2-butene at room temperature whereby an exothermic reaction is obtained causing the temperature of the mixture to rise, then maintaining the mixture at no higher than reflux temperature until the reaction is complete, wherein these reactants are in a molar proportion of between about about 1:3 and about 3:1 relative to each other, said agent being present in a bacteriacidally or algaecidally effective amount.

6. The composition of claim 5 wherein said aqueous media comprises recirculating water.

7. The composition of claim 5 wherein said composition is an aqueous emulsion containing non-ionic emulsifiers.

8. The composition of claim 5 wherein said composition is a hand cream or baby lotion.
Description



This invention relates to microbiocidal agents, and it particularly relates to microbiocidal agents comprising polymeric quaternary ammonium compounds.

It is known that many quaternary ammonium compounds have biocidal or inhibitory effects on microorganisms. However, few such compounds, or indeed few biocidal compounds of any type, have been found to have all the necessary characteristics required for the biocidal treatment of aqueous systems of the recirculated type such as industrial or process waters of the type used in paper manufacturing, cooling towers, air conditioners, humidifiers and the like. Even relatively standing waters such as swimming pools have been problems insofar as maintaining them substantially free of bacteria, fungi and algae.

The control of microorganisms in aqueous systems of the aforesaid type has long been recognized as a particularly burdensome problem since the environment of the aqueous medium itself is often extremely conducive to rapid multiplication and growth of these undesirable organisms. Only through the rise of carefully tailored microbiocidal agents can this growth and reproduction be reliably controlled without detriment to the process in which the water is used. For example, many times a biocidal compound is rendered completely inactive by the particular surrounding media containing the undesirable microorganisms. A particular problem in recirculated waters is that the recirculation causes many difficult problems, among which is the gradual build-up and accumulation of undesirable microorganisms in the aqueous fluid. Various bacteria, fungi and algae are favorably produced in such recirculated waters.

Another common feature of quaternary ammonium biocides is that their biocidal effectiveness is diminished in the presence of non-ionic emulsifiers, often to the point where they no longer function as acceptable biocides. This has significantly reduced their possible use in cosmetics and similar preparations that require the inclusion of non-ionic emulsifiers.

An additional problem in the use of most microbiocidal agents in aqueous systems is the formation of large amounts of foam. This foam is generally highly undesirable and the formation thereof by these agents often makes them useless for particular applications.

In accordance with the present invention, it has now been discovered that certain polymeric quaternary ammonium compounds and, particularly, the product made by the condensation of 1,4-dihalo-2-butene and 1,4-bis-dimethylamino-2-butene is not only a highly effective microbiocidal agent in aqueous systems, including recirculating waters, industrial waters, cosmetics and other emulsions containing non-ionic emulsifiers, as well as in general usage, but also effects such purpose without causing undue foaming.

It is to be noted that a particular aspect of the present invention is that the quaternary ammonium moieties of the present compounds are part of a long chain rather than being on branches that are bonded to the long chain.

The aforesaid compounds are active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa at a concentration relative to the total composition as low as 25 ppm, although the preferred concentration is about 150 ppm. Against Aerobacter aerogenes, they are active at a concentration as low as 10 ppm, although the preferred concentration is about 100 ppm. Against algae, such as Chlorella pyrenoidosa, they are active at a concentration at least as low as 1 ppm and probably even much below that concentration according to present indications.

Insofar as concerns upper limits, the concentration may apparently be increased indefinitely without deleteriously affecting the biocidal activity.

More specifically with regard to cosmetic compositions, the products of this invention are effective at a concentration at least as low as about 500 ppm relative to the total composition, and probably at even lower concentrations, according to present indications. The preferred range, however, is about 1,000 to 2,000 ppm.

There is no absolute certainty of the actual structure of the product of the condensation reaction because isomerizations are possible. However, ideally, the reaction would appear to be as follows: ##SPC1##

wherein X is a halogen such as chlorine or bromine and n is an integer from about 2 to 30.

The following examples illustrate the present invention with no intent to be limited thereby, however, except as claimed:

EXAMPLE 1

14.2 grams of 1,4-bis-dimethylamino-2-butene (0.1 mole) was dissolved in 25 grams of water, and to it was added 12.5 grams (0.1 mole) of 1,4-dicholoro-2-butene over a period of 15 to 30 minutes while maintaining constant stirring. The reaction was exothermic so that the temperature rose to about 60.degree.-70.degree.C. The reaction mixture was then warmed on a steam bath at a temperature of about 80.degree.C. for about 1 hour, after which the reaction was considered complete. Titration of ionized chlorine was used as a measure of the extent of the reaction and indicated between 98 and 100% completeness. The reaction product was a viscous material containing about 50% active material.

It was found that when a significant excess of the dichlorobutene was used, a second phase separated out of the final reaction product. Analysis indicated this second phase to contain primarily unreacted dichlorobutene.

Quite surprisingly, the compounds of this invention may be obtained directly as crystalline-like solids when the reaction is carried out in certain organic solvents such as isopropanol, acetone and inert halogenated solvents. This is illustrated as follows:

EXAMPLE 2

14.2 grams of 1,4-bis-dimethylamino-2-butene were mixed with 25 grams of isopropanol, and to it was added, with stirring, 12.5 grams of 1,4-dichloro-2-butene over a period of about 15 minutes (or at a rate which keeps the solvent gently refluxing). After the exothermic reaction subsided, the mixture was warmed on a ateam bath to reflux temperature and maintained at such temperature for about 1 hour. It was then cooled, to room temperature, whereby a precipitate was formed. The precipitate was then separated out by filtration as the final product. The precipitate weighed 18.7 grams. This product is substantially free from impurities caused by side reactions or due to absorption of unreacted starting materials, thereby making it easier to purify for use in cosmetics or cosmetic emulsions.

Solid products of the above type have the commercial advantage over aqueous solutions or dispersions because they have less bulk on a pound for pound active ingredient basis.

EXAMPLE 3

The same reactants and procedures were used as in Example 2 except that instead of the isopropanol, 25 grams of acetone was used. It yielded 21.4 grams of a solid product.

The same procedures may be used except that 1,4-dibromo-2-butene is substituted for the 1,4-dichloro-2-butene, with equivalent mol ratios. The product is substantially similar in all essential characteristics.

EXAMPLE 4

142 grams of 1,4-bis-dimethylamino-2-butene were dissolved in 300 ml. of 1,1,1-trichloroethane and to it was added slowly, with constant stirring, 125 grams of 1,4-dichloro-2-butene at a rate which kept the reaction mixture at a temperature between 45.degree. and 60.degree.C., and stirring was continued at 45.degree. to 60.degree.C. for 1 hour after an almost-white precipitate was first deposited. After cooling, the precipitate was collected by filtration and dried in a vacuum desiccator. It weighed 245 grams.

Various changes in relative proportions were made to determine whether any significant variations occurred. These as illustrated as follows:

EXAMPLE 5

14.2 grams of 1,4-bis-dimethylamino-2-butene (0.1 mole) was dissolved in 35 grams of water, and to it was added 25.0 grams of 1,4-dichloro-2-butene (0.2 moles) over a period of 15-30 minutes, maintaining constant stirring. The reaction was exothermic. After 1 hour analysis for ionic chloride showed that the reaction was about 98% complete.

EXAMPLE 6

The same reactants and procedures were used as in Example 5, but the solvent was 35 grams of isopropyl alcohol instead of water. After about 1 hour, the solid polymeric product was filtered off. It weighed about 18.7 grams.

EXAMPLE 7

The same reactants and procedures as used in Example 5, but using 35 grams of acetone as a solvent instead of water, gave a solid product which weighed 21.4 grams after filtration.

EXAMPLE 8

14.2 grams of 1,4-bis-dimethylamino-2-butene (0.1 mole) was dissolved in 45 grams of water, and to it was added 37.5 grams of 1,4-dichloro-2-butene over a period of 15-30 minutes, maintaining constant stirring. The reaction was exothermic. After one hour, analysis for ionic chloride showed that the reaction was about 98% complete.

EXAMPLE 9

The same reactants and procedures as used in Example 8 were used with 45 grams of isopropyl alcohol instead of water. After about 1 hour, the solid polymeric product was filtered off. It weighed about 18.7 grams.

EXAMPLE 10

The same reactants and procedures as used in Example 8, but using 45 grams of acetone instead of water gave a solid product which weighed 21.4 grams after filtration.

EXAMPLE 11

14.2 grams of bis-dimethylamino-2-butene (0.1 mole) was dissolved in 20 grams of water and to it was added 6.3 grams of 1,4-dichloro-2-butene (0.05 mole) over a period of 15-30 minutes. The reaction was exothermic. After 1 hour, analysis for ionic chloride showed that the reaction was about 98% complete.

EXAMPLE 12

The same reactants and procedures used in Example 11 were used with 20 grams of isopropyl alcohol as solvent instead of water. After about 1 hour, the solid polymeric product was filtered off. It weighed 9.4 grams.

EXAMPLE 13

The same reactants and procedures as used in Example 11 were used, except that 20 grams of acetone replaced water as solvent. After about 1 hour, the product weighed about 10.7 grams.

EXAMPLE 14

21.3 grams of 1,4-bis-dimethylamino-2-butene was (0.15 moles) dissolved in 25 grams of water, and to it was added 6.3 grams of 1,4-dichloro-2-butene (0.05 moles) over a period of 15-30 minutes, maintaining constant stirring. After 1 hour, analysis for ionic chloride showed about 98% completion.

EXAMPLE 15

The same reactants used in Example 14, but with 25 grams of isopropyl alcohol replacing water as solvent, produced 9.4 grams of solid polymeric product after filtration.

EXAMPLE 16

The same reactants used in Example 14, but with 25 grams of acetone replacing water as solvent, produced about 10.7 grams of solid polymeric product.

EXAMPLE 17

In order to determine the microbiocidal effectiveness of the present compound, the following test procedures were used:

Bactericidal Tests

1. 50 ml. volume of the product of Example 1 (hereinafter referred to as "product A") was diluted in distilled water to the test concentration, and was added asceptically to previously sterilized cotton-stoppered 125 ml. Erlenmeyer flasks. For comparative purposes, the same test concentration was prepared using another known microbiocidal polymeric quaternary ammonium compound, namely a product produced by the reaction of bis(2-chloroethyl) ether and tetramethyl ethylenediamine (hereinafter referred to as "Product B").

2. One set of test flasks were each inoculated with 0.5 ml. of a 1/10 nutrient broth dilution of a 24-hour nutrient broth culture of Aerobacter aerogenes and another set of test flasks were each inoculated with 0.5 ml. of a one-tenth nutrient broth dilution of a 24-hour nutrient broth culture of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

3. At 30 and 60, minutes following inoculation, a 1 ml. aliquot of each product was removed rrom each flask and added to 9 ml. of sterile azolectin/"Tween 80" neutralizer from which additional 10 fold serial dilutions were prepared in the sterile neutralizer solution.

4. Agar plate counts were prepared from 10.sup..sup.-2 and 10.sup..sup.-3 dilutions.

5. A control of sterile distilled water was similarly inoculated and aliquots were made at the same intervals and plates at 10.sup..sup.-4, 10.sup..sup.-5, and 10.sup..sup.-6 dilutions.

6. A comparison of the surviving organisms for various concentrations of test materials, at the different time periods was made. The results were as follows:

Table 1 ______________________________________ AGAINST PSEUDOMONAS AEROGINOSA ______________________________________ Conc. No. of Bacteria Surviving After Sample in ppm. 30 min. 60 min. ______________________________________ "Product A" 75 29,600 18,500 100 18,000 6,800 "Product B" 150 26,000 6,800 200 19,900 4,000 250 12,200 200 Untreated 8,500,000 12,500,000 (Control) ______________________________________

Table 2 ______________________________________ AGAINST AEROBACTER AEROGENES ______________________________________ Conc. No. of Bacteria Surviving After Sample in ppm. 30 min. 60 min. ______________________________________ "Product A" 20 5,600 4,300 50 3,000 1,000 100 1,200 < 100 "Product B" 100 30,000 30,000 200 5,700 700 300 700 < 100 Untreated (Control) 10,500,000 11,000,000 ______________________________________

Table 3 ______________________________________ The following Table comprises a comparison of "Product A" and "Product B" at identical concentrations: AGAINST AEROBACTER AEROGENES ______________________________________ Conc. No of Bacteria Surviving After in ppm. 30 min. 60 min. 180 min. ______________________________________ "Product A" 20 5,900 1,400 <100 50 3,300 450 <100 100 1,250 350 <100 "Product B" 20 >300,000 >300,000 94,000 50 >300,000 166,000 28,100 100 >300,000 87,500 14,350 ______________________________________

Algaestatic Tests

1. 24 ml. volumes of Product A and Product B were prepared in sterile Erlenmeyer flasks at various test concentrations.

2. 1 ml. of 5-7 days "Allen's liquid medium" growth of Chlorella pyrenoidosa (Wisc. strain) was added to each flask (Allen's liquid medium is a standard test composition comprising 50 mg. NH.sub.4 Cl, 1000 mg. NaNo.sub.3, 250 mg. K.sub.2 HPO.sub.4, 3 mg. FeCl.sub.3, 513 mg. MgSO.sub.4, 50 mg. CaCl.sub.2, and 1000 mil. distilled water).

3. The inoculated flasks, plus untreated inoculated control flasks, were incubated at room temperature (about 25.degree.C.) under continuous artificial illumination.

4. Following 5 to 7 days incubation, observation was made for macroscopic growth to determine the minimum inhibitory level for each test material.

The results were as follows:

Table 4 ______________________________________ Sample Minimum effective concentration in ppm. ______________________________________ "Product A" 1.0 "Product B" 1.5 ______________________________________

In order to determine the non-foaming properties of the present invention as compared with other highly potent commercial quaternary ammonium compounds, a comparative test was made, using the "Waring Blender Foam Test" between "Product A," "BTC 776" (Onyx Chemical Co.), an alkyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium chloride, and "BTC 2125" (Onyx Chemical Co.), a mixture of alkyl dimethyl benzyl ammonium compounds and alkyl dimethyl ethylbenzyl ammonium compounds. The procedure was as follows:

A graduated blender cylinder is rinsed with distilled water. 100 ml. of aqueous test solution is added down the walls of the blender so as to cause no foam. the blender is turned to high speed for exactly 5 seconds, and upon turning the blades off, timing is started with a stop watch, and at the same time the foam height read in mm. from the 100 ml. mark. The foam half-life is defined as the time it takes for liquid to drain out of the foam and reach the 50 ml. mark.

The results were as follows:

Table 5 ______________________________________ Sample ppm. Foam Height in mm. Half-life ______________________________________ "BTC 776" 50 15 mm. 7.2 sec. "Product A" 50 0 0 "BTC 2125" 50 15 mm. 11.4 sec. ______________________________________

A further test was made using the "Cylinder Shake Test" procedure which is as follows:

CYLINDER SHAKE TEST

100 ml. of test solution is gently poured down the walls of a 250 ml. graduated cylinder that has a glass stopper. The cylinder is stoppered and inverted 20 times in 15 seconds, finally resting it in an upright position. The foam height is read in cc. from the base of the foam.

Table 6 ______________________________________ Foam Height in cc. Sample ppm. Initial 1 min. 5 min. ______________________________________ "BTC 776" 50 45 34 30 "Product A" 50 0 0 0 "BTC 2125" 50 50 6 4 ______________________________________

Another test used was the standard "Ross-Miles Test" using the procedure reported in "ASTM Standards, Designation 1175-53, Part X, 1958, page 878," which is the ASTM test for foaming properties of surface active material. The results were as follows:

Table 7 ______________________________________ Foam Height in cc. Sample ppm. Initial 1 min. 5 min. ______________________________________ "BTC 776" 50 35 30 20 "Product A" 50 0 0 0 "BTC 2125" 50 35 15 10 ______________________________________

The above results clearly show not only that the product of this invention is highly biocidal but that it is non-foaming, whereas other quaternary ammonium biocides cause a relatively large amount of foaming in aqueous composition.

The following examples illustrate various cosmetic compositions using the product of the present invention:

Example 18 ______________________________________ Components % by Wt. % by Wt. % by Wt. % by Wt. ______________________________________ Mineral oil (65/75 Visc.) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 Lanolin (Cosmetic Grade) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Cetyl alcohol 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 "TWEEN 80" (Atlas Powder Co.) (non-ionic 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 emulsifier) "SPAN 80" (Atlas Powder Co.) (non-ionic 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 emulsifier) "Product A" 0 0.1 0.2 0.4 Water (Distilled) 55.0 54.9 54.8 54.6 ______________________________________

The compositions were each prepared in the following manner:

In the case of the first formulation, without Product A, the mineral oil, lanolin, cetyl alcohol, Tween 80, and "Span 80" were combined and heated to about 65.degree.-70.degree.C. The water was heated to about 65.degree.-70.degree.C. and added slowly to the hot non-aqueous phase while stirring the mixture until it emulsified completely. The emulsion was cooled to room temperature using continued agitation.

In each formulation when Product A was incorporated, the mineral oil, lanolin, cetyl alcohol, Tween 80, and Span 80 were combined and heated to about 65.degree.-70.degree.C. The water and Product A were combined and heated to about 65.degree.-70.degree.C. Then the hot aqueous solution was added slowly to the hot non-aqueous phase while stirring, and agitation was maintained until emulsification was effected. Then the emulsion was cooled with continued stirring to room temperature. The resultant product was an oil-in-water emulsion.

These compositions are utilizable as hand creams and baby lotions.

These compositions were tested in the following manner:

50 gm. samples from each composition were aseptically transferred to sterile 8 oz. wide mouth jars. Two replicate jars were prepared in every instance, including an untreated control. Each jar was inoculated with 2.5 ml. of a one-ten sterile nutrient heated dilution of pooled 24 hour broth cultures of Staphylococcus aureus. Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Enterobacteraerogenes, proteus species and Bacillus species. In this manner a bacterial challenge load of 1-10.times.10.sup.6 bacteria/ml. of jar content was obtained. All the inoculated jars were stored at 25.degree.- 27.degree.C. At weekly intervals following inoculation, 1 ml. aliquots of jar content were removed from each jar and tenfold serial dilutions were prepared therefrom in sterile Azalectin/Tween 80 neutralizer solution which were plated into TGE a jar. In this manner the number of surviving viable bacteria in each jar was determined. In those instances where no viable surviving bacteria (<10 bacteria) were observed at four weeks following inoculation, the jar contents were reinoculated exactly as previously described for the inoculation procedure. Storage of all jars was continued at 25.degree.-27.degree.C., and weekly platings were prepared therefrom to enumerate the surviving viable bacteria. A total of eight weekly plating observations were prepared following the inoculation of each jar.

From a statistical point of view, there is no significant difference between an initial inoculum load of 1.times.10.sup.6 and 10.times.10.sup.6 bacteria/ml. The variation around the mean of the inoculum concentration is of little importance when a reduction to less than 10/ml. of viable bacteria is observed.

Table 8 ______________________________________ INOCULATION -- at 6 .times. 10.sup.6 organisms/ml. of jar content for each of the four formulations of Example 18. Week Count Count Count Count ______________________________________ 1 69 .times. 10.sup.6 15,000 < 10 < 10 2 71 .times. 10.sup.6 74,000 < 10 < 10 3 54 .times. 10.sup.6 1,400 < 10 < 10 4 81 .times. 10.sup.6 10 < 10 < 10 ______________________________________

In order to double-check the validity of this test showing less than 10 organisms/ml. after four weeks, the samples were reinoculated and the weekly counts after reinoculation were:

Week Count Count Count Count ______________________________________ 5 108 .times. 10.sup.6 <10 <10 <10 6 169 .times. 10.sup.6 <10 <10 <10 7 180 .times. 10.sup.6 <10 <10 <10 8 209 .times. 10.sup.6 <10 <10 <10 ______________________________________

The following example were prepared in the same manner as Example 18, but substituting other well-known, highly active biocidal quaternary ammonium compounds for Product A. They were then similarly evaluated.

Example 19 ______________________________________ Components % by Wt. % by Wt. % by Wt. % by Wt. ______________________________________ Mineral oil (65/75 Visc.) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 Lanolin (Cosmetic Grade) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Cetyl Alcohol 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 "TWEEN 80" 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 "SPAN 80" 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 "BTC 812" (50%) (Onyx Chem.Co.) 0 0.1 0.2 0.4 Water (Distilled) 55.0 54.9 54.8 54.6 ______________________________________

Table 9 ______________________________________ INOCULATION -- at 4.7 .times. 10.sup.6 organisms/ml. of jar content for each of the four formulations of Example 19. Week Count Count Count Count ______________________________________ 1 16.times.10.sup.6 16.times.10.sup.6 10.times.10.sup.6 4.times.10.sup.6 2 98.times.10.sup.6 12.times.10.sup.6 11.times.10.sup.6 5.times.10.sup.6 3 67.times.10.sup.6 40.times.10.sup.6 24.times.10.sup.6 10.times.10.sup.6 4 142.times.10.sup.6 102.times.10.sup.6 84.times.10.sup.6 61.times.10.sup.6 5 167.times.10.sup.6 119.times.10.sup.6 84.times.10.sup.6 67.times.10.sup.6 6 180.times.10.sup.6 144.times.10.sup.6 32.times.10.sup.6 44.times.10.sup.6 7 140.times.10.sup.6 95.times.10.sup.6 82.times.10.sup.6 76.times.10.sup.6 8 94.times.10.sup.6 82.times.10.sup.6 68.times.10.sup.6 54.times.10.sup.6 ______________________________________

Example 20 ______________________________________ Components % by Wt. % by Wt. % by Wt. % by Wt. ______________________________________ Mineral oil (65/75 Visc.) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 Lanolin (Cosmetic Grade) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Cetyl alcohol 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 "TWEEN 80" 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 "SPAN 80" 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 "BTC 2125M" (50%) (Onyx Chem.Co.) 0 0.1 0.2 0.4 Water (Distilled) 55.0 54.9 54.8 54.6 ______________________________________

Table 10 ______________________________________ INOCULATION -- at 3.8.times.10.sup.6 organisms/ml. of jar content for each of the four formulations of Example 20: Week Count Count Count Count ______________________________________ 1 18.times.10.sup.6 18.times.10.sup.6 15.times.10.sup.6 8.8.times.10.sup.6 2 23.times.10.sup.6 21.times.10.sup.6 12.times.10.sup.6 6.2.times.10.sup.6 3 87.times.10.sup.6 74.times.10.sup.6 84.times.10.sup.6 56.times.10.sup.6 4 106.times.10.sup.6 56.times.10.sup.6 70.times.10.sup.6 80.times.10.sup.6 5 109.times.10.sup.6 84.times.10.sup.6 56.times.10.sup.6 26.times.10.sup.6 6 92.times.10.sup.6 79.times.10.sup.6 45.times.10.sup.6 36.times.10.sup.6 7 114.times.10.sup.6 89.times.10.sup.6 67.times.10.sup.6 50.times.10.sup.6 8 121.times.10.sup.6 102.times.10.sup.6 81.times.10.sup.6 62.times.10.sup.6 ______________________________________

Example 21 ______________________________________ Components % by Wt. % by Wt. % by Wt. % by Wt. ______________________________________ Mineral oil 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 (65/75 Visc.) Lanolin (Cosmetic Grade) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Cetyl alcohol 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 "TWEEN 80" 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 "SPAN 80" 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 "HYAMINE 1622" (50%) Rohm & Haas) 0 0.1 0.2 0.4 Water (Distilled) 55.0 54.9 54.8 54.6 ______________________________________

Table 11 ______________________________________ INOCULATION -- at 3.8.times.10.sup.6 organisms/ml. of jar content for each of the four formulations of Example 21: Week Count Count Count Count ______________________________________ 1 22.times.10.sup.6 19.times.10.sup.6 17.times.10.sup.6 15.times.10.sup.6 2 24.times.10.sup.6 21.times.10.sup.6 19.times.10.sup.6 14.times.10.sup.6 3 86.times.10.sup.6 71.times.10.sup.6 94.times.10.sup.6 81.times.10.sup.6 4 94.times.10.sup.6 80.times.10.sup.6 72.times.10.sup.6 92.times.10.sup.6 5 106.times.10.sup.6 74.times.10.sup.6 67.times.10.sup.6 56.times.10.sup.6 6 116.times.10.sup.6 91.times.10.sup.6 84.times.10.sup.6 70.times.10.sup.6 7 92.times.10.sup.6 74.times.10.sup.6 42.times.10.sup.6 28.times.10.sup.6 8 94.times.10.sup.6 82.times.10.sup.6 56.times.10.sup.6 43.times.10.sup.6 ______________________________________

Example 22 ______________________________________ Components % by Wt. % by Wt. % by Wt. % by Wt. ______________________________________ Mineral oil (65/75 Visc.) 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 Lanolin (Cosmetic Grade) 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Cetyl alcohol 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 "TWEEN 80" 5.4 5.4 5.4 5.4 "SPAN 80" 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 "HYAMINE 2389" (50%) (Rohm & Haas) 0 0.1 0.2 0.4 Water (Distilled) 55.0 54.9 54.8 54.6 ______________________________________

Table 12 ______________________________________ INOCULATION -- at 4.8.times.10.sup.6 organisms/ml. of jar content for each of the four formulations of Example 22: Week Count Count Count Count ______________________________________ 1 20.times.10.sup.6 16.times.10.sup.6 16.times.10.sup.6 12.times.10.sup.6 2 89.times.10.sup.6 17.times.10.sup.6 14.times.10.sup.6 15.times.10.sup.6 3 104.times.10.sup.6 34.times.10.sup.6 44.times.10.sup.6 16.times.10.sup.6 4 92.times.10.sup.6 50.times.10.sup.6 2.times.10.sup.6 40.times.10.sup.6 5 79.times.10.sup.6 60.times.10.sup.6 45.times.10.sup.6 29.times.10.sup.6 6 104.times.10.sup.6 92.times.10.sup.6 60.times.10.sup.6 22.times.10.sup.6 7 89.times.10.sup.6 67.times.10.sup.6 32.times.10.sup.6 15.times.10.sup.6 8 76.times.10.sup.6 40.times.10.sup.6 28.times.10.sup.6 20.times.10.sup.6 ______________________________________

Although oil-in-water emulsions have been described above, it is within the scope of the present invention to use water-in-oil emulsions for the same purposes.

* * * * *


uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.

© 2024 USPTO.report | Privacy Policy | Resources | RSS Feed of Trademarks | Trademark Filings Twitter Feed