U.S. patent number 3,870,626 [Application Number 05/336,383] was granted by the patent office on 1975-03-11 for method for reducing the mercaptan content of a middle distillate oil.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Gulf Research & Development Company. Invention is credited to Robert A. Plundo, Thomas C. Readal, James R. Strom.
United States Patent |
3,870,626 |
Plundo , et al. |
March 11, 1975 |
**Please see images for:
( Certificate of Correction ) ** |
Method for reducing the mercaptan content of a middle distillate
oil
Abstract
Middle distillate virgin oils, such as straight run furnace oil,
jet fuel or kerosene are required to meet many commercial
specifications, among which are maximum allowable total sulfur
content, maximum allowable mercaptan sulfur content and maximum
allowable total acid number. Middle distillates which do not meet
commercial specifications in regard to total sulfur content can be
hydrodesulfurized for the removal of the portion of the total
sulfur required for meeting the commercial requirement. Such
hydrodesulfurization requires more severe conditions than do
processes for reduction of total acid number or for reduction of
mercaptan sulfur content so that under the severe conditions
required for hydrodesulfurization, excessive total acid number and
excessive mercaptan content are automatically concomitantly reduced
to commercially acceptable levels. The present invention relates to
the hydrotreatment of virgin middle distillates which meet
commercial specifications in regard to total sulfur content in the
absence of prior hydrotreating or any other treatment, but do not
meet commercial specifications in regard to total acid number or in
regard to mercaptan sulfur content. According to the present
invention, the latter middle distillates are not blended with high
total sulfur feeds flowing to hydrodesulfurization processes
requiring severe conditions to accomplish reduction in total sulfur
content, but are hydrotreated separately under relatively more mild
catalytic hydrotreating conditions to reduce mercaptan sulfur
content or total acid number at hydrotreating severities which are
so mild that there is an extremely limited consumption of hydrogen
and a very limited removal of total sulfur. The catalyst employed
in the mild hydrotreating processes of this invention is a
deactivated hydrotreating catalyst from a more severe
hydrodesulfurization or other hydrotreating operation which is no
longer of viable use in the more severe operation due to numerous
cycles of use and regeneration, due to excessive metals deposit
thereon, or any other reason.
Inventors: |
Plundo; Robert A. (Greensburg,
PA), Readal; Thomas C. (McCandless Township, PA), Strom;
James R. (O'Hara Township, PA) |
Assignee: |
Gulf Research & Development
Company (Pittsburgh, PA)
|
Family
ID: |
23315840 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/336,383 |
Filed: |
February 27, 1973 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
208/216R;
208/263; 208/264 |
Current CPC
Class: |
C10G
45/02 (20130101); C10G 45/04 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
C10G
45/02 (20060101); C10G 45/04 (20060101); C10g
023/02 () |
Field of
Search: |
;208/216,263,15,264 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Gantz; Delbert E.
Assistant Examiner: Spresser; C. E.
Claims
We claim:
1. A relatively low pressure process for hydrotreating a straight
run No. 2 home heating fuel oil feed having a total sulfur content
of less than 0.2 weight percent, comprising passing said oil over a
hydrotreating catalyst, said straight run feed oil containing more
than 30 ppm of mercaptan sulfur, the pressure in said process being
no greater than about 150 psi, the temperature in said process
being from 400.degree. to below 500.degree.F., hydrogen consumption
including solution losses in said process being no greater than
about 25 standard cubic feet of hydrogen per barrel of feed oil,
and recovering an effluent oil containing less than 30 ppm of
mercaptan sulfur, said catalyst having been employed in a prior
hydrotreating process operated at a higher pressure than the
pressure of the present process until it has been substantially
permanently deactivated for purposes of said high pressure
process.
2. The process of claim 1 wherein at least 80 weight percent of the
mercaptan sulfur is removed while the total sulfur content of the
feed oil is reduced not more than 10 weight percent.
3. The process of claim 1 wherein the catalyst comprises supported
Group VI and Group VIII metals and the pressure is no greater than
100 psi.
4. The process of claim 1 wherein the temperature is below
450.degree.F.
5. The process of claim 1 wherein the LHSV is between 4 and 8.
6. The process of claim 1 wherein at least 90 weight percent of the
mercaptan sulfur is removed while not more than 20 weight percent
of the total sulfur content of the feed oil is removed.
7. The process of claim 1 wherein the prior relatively high
pressure hydrotreating process is a hydrodesulfurization process
operated at a pressure above 600 psi.
8. The process of claim 1 wherein chemical hydrogen consumption
excluding solution losses is less than 5 standard cubic feet per
barrel of feed oil.
9. The process of claim 1 wherein hydrogen consumption including
solution losses is less than 15 standard cubic feet per barrel of
feed oil.
10. The process of claim 1 wherein the hydrogen circulation rate is
between 200 and 1,200 standard cubic feet per barrel of feed
oil.
11. The process of claim 1 wherein the feed oil contains at least
410 ppm of mercaptan sulfur.
12. The process of claim 1 wherein there is substantially 100
percent yield in the feed oil.
Description
This invention relates to a very mild hydrotreatment of virgin
middle distillates such as furnace oil, kerosene, jet fuels, light
gas oils or diesel oils in order to reduce the total acid number of
the mercaptan content of the distillate without greatly reducing
the total sulfur content of the oils in the presence of a catalyst
which has previously been deactivated in a more severe
hydrotreating process. This invention is related to two patent
applications filed by the same inventors on even date herewith
entitled "Method for Utilizing a Fixed Catalyst Bed in Separate
Hydrogenation Processes" and "Method for Reducing the Total Acid
Number of a Middle Distillate Oil", bearing Ser. No. 336,384 and
336,382, respectively.
The middle distillates of this invention boil generally above the
naphtha range and generally exclude lubricating oils.
Middle distillates which do not meet commercial requirements in
regard to total sulfur content, which is about 0.2 weight percent
sulfur for fuel oils detined for use as home heating fuel, are
commonly hydrodesulfurized under relatively severe conditions in
order to reduce the total sulfur content to a level at least as low
as the commercial requirement. Such hydrodesulfurization processes
generally occur in the presence of a Group VI and Group VIII metal
containing catalyst such as cobalt-molybdenum,
nickel-cobalt-molybdenum or nickel-tungsten on a non-cracking
support such as alumina or alumina with a small stabilizing but
non-cracking amount of silica which can be, for example, less than
0.5 percent, or less than than 1 percent by weight. Common severe
hydrodesulfurization conditions include a temperature range between
650.degree. or 675.degree. and 800.degree.F. (343.degree. or
357.degree. and 427.degree.C.), a pressure of at least 600 psig (42
kg/cm.sup.2) and more generally in the range between 1,000 and
2,000 or 3,000 psig (70 and 140 or 210 kg/cm.sup.2), a liquid
hourly space velocity between about 0.7 and 2 and a hydrogen
circulation rate of between about 2,000 and 3,000 standard cubic
feet per barrel of hydrogen (36 and 54 SCM/100L), which hydrogen
can be about 75 to 80 percent pure. Hydrogen consumption is
commonly about 400 standard cubic feet per barrel (72 SCM/100L) at
1,000 psi (70 kg/cm.sup.2) operation or about 500 standard cubic
feet per barrel (9 SCM/100L) at 2,000 psi (140 kg/cm.sup.2)
operation. These are only examples of severe hydrodesulfurization
conditions, and are non-limiting.
In refinery operations utilizing such hydrodesulfurization
operations, virgin middle distillates from a multiplicity of crude
oil sources are commonly combined for feeding to such high pressure
hydrodesulfurizers. The various middle distillates that are
combined may individually fail to meet commercial specifications in
regard to less than all standards. A middle distillate which fails
to meet commercial requirements in regard to total sulfur content
must be treated under the severe high pressure desulfurization
conditions described above. However, in accordance with the present
invention it has been found that a straight run middle distillate
which does meet commercial total sulfur requirements in the absence
of any prior hydrotreatment but fails to meet commercial total acid
number requirements and/or commercial mercaptan requirements need
not be blended with the high total sulfur fuel but can be treated
separately in a different reactor under more mild conditions
without employing a fresh catalyst but rather employing a catalyst
that has been deactivated in a separate reactor under relatively
more severe hydrogenation or hydrodesulfurization conditions to a
state that its use is no longer viable in the severe hydrogenation
operation.
High total acid numbers in oils are primarily due to the presence
of naphthenic acids in the oil. The acid attacks copper and zinc in
fuel handling systems. This type of metals pick-up not only induces
metal losses in pipelines which affect metal ratios in alloys but
also causes instability leading to sludge formation in the oil
which can cause the oil to deposit sludge on injectors, float
controls and other critical parts. In one known case a high
neutralization number diesel oil was found to pick up sufficient
zinc from a diesel engine to cause engine shutdown. Harmful effects
in equipment due to high copper pick-up with employing a high total
acid number oil have also been experienced. For these reasons,
commercial specifications in the United States require total acid
numbers in oils to be below 0.1, as determined by either of two
ASTM test methods disclosed below while European commercial
specifications generally require total acid numbers below 0.2.
Mercaptans are objectionable in fuel oils employed in homes or
industrial plants primarily because they are strongly and
unpleasantly oderiferous materials. Furthermore, they are very
volatile and unstable compounds and can present a safety problem if
present in excessive amounts. However, the prevailing commercial
specification for mercaptans of 30 ppm (maximum), or 0.003 weight
percent, is based upon odor considerations as this level represents
the threshold at which the presence of mercaptans is detectable by
odor. Because of the repugnant odor of mercaptans, a level above 30
ppm of mercaptan in the oil would render the mere presence of a
fuel oil obnoxious in a home or industrial establishment. In
addition, since mercaptans are mild acids, they can also contribute
to a corrosion problem of the oil. Furthermore, a mercaptan content
above 30 ppm has been found to contribute to gel-type sludge
formation in an oil, causing plugging in pipelines in which the oil
is standing or flowing.
In accordance with the present invention, an extremely mild
hydrogenation treatment has been developed for the reduction of
total acid number and/or mercaptan sulfur content in virgin oils
which already meet commercial total sulfur content requirements,
i.e., a maximum sulfur content below 0.2 weight percent sulfur for
home heating fuels. The present invention accomplishes a reduction
in total acid number and/or mercaptan sulfur content in oils which
already meet commercial total sulfur content requirements without
blending such oils with high total sulfur content oils prior to
hydrodesulfurization of high total sulfur-content oils under severe
conditions, as has been the practice in the past. High total sulfur
content oils not only require treatment in a high pressure and
temperature hydrodesulfurization unit to accomplish
hydrodesulfurization, but also require a highly active
hydrogenation catalyst. Such conditions will automatically reduce
excessive total acid numbers and excessive mercaptan sulfur
contents to commercially acceptable values. However, where a
straight run middle distillate already meets commercial total
sulfur requirements we have now found that total acid number and
mercaptan content can be reduced under much milder hydrogenation
conditions with a degenerated and deactivated hydrogenation
catalyst so that such feeds can be separately treated in another
reactor without unnecessarily consuming valuable space in high
pressure reactors. There has not previously been a sufficiently
mild hydrogenation process to make independent hydrogenation of
these oils economic and therefore in hydrogenative treatment they
formerly were reduced in total acid number or mercaptan sulfur
content by aqueous caustic treatment. However, this method may soon
have to be abandoned because the aqueous effluent from caustic
units represents an unacceptable stream pollutant under present-day
environmental standards.
We have now discovered that the degree of hydrogenation required
for the reduction of total acid number or mercaptan sulfur content
in virgin middle distillates to acceptable commercial levels where
the nature of the crude oil source of these oils is such that these
oils already satisfy commercial total sulfur requirements, is so
low that it is commercially wasteful to blend these oils with
hydrodesulfurization feeds wherein the nature of the crude oil
source of the oil is such that a major portion of the total sulfur
content of the feed must be also reduced. We have discovered that
hydrogenative treatment for reduction of total sulfur requires
treatment under hydrodesulfurization conditions which are
unnecessarily severe for the low sulfur feeds of this invention.
For example, we have found that straight run middle distillates
which do not satisfy commercial total acid number and/or mercaptan
content requirements but do satisfy commercial total sulfur
requirements without hydrotreatment can be separately treated to
produce commercially acceptable levels in regard to total acid
number and/or mercaptan content in units wherein chemical
consumption requirements are only from one to five, or even lower,
standard cubic feet of hydrogen per barrel of feed (from 0.018 to
0.09 standard cubic meters per 100 liters of feed) and unit
hydrogen consumption including hydrogen losses are less than 10 or
15 standard cubic feet per barrel of feed (less than 0.18 to 0.27
standard cubic meters per 100 liters of feed). The catalytic
activity required to accomplish such a slight chemical hydrogen
consumption is so correspondingly slight that use of an active or
fresh hydrodesulfurization or hydrogenation catalyst is not only
wasteful but accomplishes a level of hydrogenation which is not
required by the process. To illustrate, a virgin middle distillate
stream is ordinarily relatively olefin-free so that it contains
only about one percent by volume of olefins, and these olefins are
relatively easy to hydrogenate. However, in accordance with the
present invention, these olefins are not hydrogenated to a major
extent because such olefin hydrogenation is not generally required
to accomplish reduction in total acid number or to accomplish
reduction in mercaptan content to commercially acceptable levels.
However, if the hydrogenation conditions of the present invention
were sufficiently severe, saturation of these olefins of itself
would account for a chemical consumption of hydrogen of about nine
standard cubic feet per barrel (0.162 standard cubic meters per 100
liters), which is higher than that generally required for the
reduction for total acid number and mercaptan content in most
feeds.
In order to diminish unnecessary chemical or unit hydrogen
consumption beyond that which is required to reduce neutralization
number and/or mercaptan sulfur content in a feed stream of this
invention to commercially acceptable levels, the present invention
ordinarily employs hydrogen pressures below 100 psi (7 kg/cm.sup.2)
and also employs as a hydrogenation catalyst a permanently
deactivated catalyst as a fixed compact bed in downflow operation,
which catalyst has been previously employed in a separate but high
pressure (600 psi or more, 4.2 kg/cm.sup.2 or more) hydrogenation
process. The catalyst is only transferred from the severe
hydrogenation process after it has experienced many regeneration
cycles and its activity loss as compared to its original cycle is
so severe that it is no longer a viable catalyst in a high
pressure, high hydrogen consumption process except by the use of
excessive start-of-run temperatures, or unacceptably short cycle
life before further regeneration is required. We have discovered,
in accordance with the present invention, that these apparently
hopelessly deactivated high pressure hydrogenation catalysts which
would otherwise be discarded or decomposed for recovery of valuable
metals have a vestige of hydrogenation activity remaining which is
sufficient for the process of the present invention. It is
emphasized, that the catalysts of the present invention would
otherwise be discarded or destroyed as being of insufficient
activity to be of further use in other refinery hydrogenation
processes. These deactivated catalysts can be subjected to a final
combustion regeneration for removal of carbon and a sulfidation
within their original reactor and at the temperature of their
original reactor, prior to transfer to the mild temperature and
pressure reactor of this invention. We have successfully employed
in the process of this invention Group VI and Group VIII metal on
alumina hydrogenation catalysts, such as NiCoMo on alumina, which
have experienced at least four or five regenerations by combustion
of carbon until in about the fifth cycle the required start-of-run
temperature to accomplish a given product sulfur level in a fuel
oil hydrodesulfurization process was elevated by 40.degree. to
60.degree.F. (22.2.degree. to 33.3.degree.C.) as compared to the
initial cycle, thereby rendering the duration of its useful life in
the fifth cycle, employing rising temperatures to compensate for
desulfurization activity loss, unacceptably short. We have also
employed in the process of this invention a deactivated
nickel-tungsten-fluorine on silica-alumina hydrocracking catalyst
which was sufficiently deactivated so that it was sufficiently
inactive for further use a compact fixed or stationary bed
hydrocracking catalyst in downflow operation but still retained
sufficient hydrogenation activity to be of use under the mild
conditions of this invention wherein the temperatures and pressures
were too low to effect significant feed cracking but were
sufficient for very mild hydrogenation. Residue
hydrodesulfurization catalyst permanently deactivated in downflow
operation as a compacted bed by feed metals can also be employed in
the present invention without prior demetallization. The only
pretreatment required for these catalysts after deactivation in
their original processes and prior to similar downflow compact bed
use in the process of the present invention is a possible
combustive regeneration and/or a possible sulfidation step, such as
by passage of a high total sulfur-content oil over the catalyst
under hydrodesulfurization conditions, after which these catalysts
can be removed from their original reactor to another or secondary
reactor, preferably of smaller wall thickness and of different
diameter. In their secondary reactor, these catalysts can be
employed under low temperature and pressure conditions for a long
or indefinite duration, often without further sulfidation or
regeneration. We have found the small, residual hydrogenation
activity remaining in these catalysts is ample for their employment
to accomplish the limited hydrogenation required for the present
invention. The following data show that the residual hydrogenation
activity present in these aged catalysts is sufficient for
reduction of total acid number via neutralization of naphthenic
acids by a major extent, such as 75, 80 or 90 percent or more, and
by reduction of mercaptan sulfur content via hydrogenation of
mercaptan sulfur molecules by a major extent such as by 60, 75, 80
or 90 percent or more, but is insufficient to concomitantly reduce
total sulfur by more than a minor amount, i.e., by not more than
10, 20, 30, 40 and less than 50 percent, and is also insufficient
to reduce olefin content by more than a minor extent, i.e., not
more than 20, 40 and less than 50 percent.
The process conditions for the present invention include
temperatures between 300.degree. and 600.degree.F. (149.degree. and
315.degree.C.), generally, and 400.degree. to 550.degree.F.
(204.degree. and 288.degree.C.), preferably, hydrogen pressures
below 100 or 150 psi (7 and 10.5 kg/cm.sup.2), generally, and below
75 psi (5.15 kg/cm.sup.2), preferably, liquid hourly space
velocities between 3 and 10, generally, and between 4 and 8,
preferably and hydrogen circulation rates between 200 and 1,200
SCF/B (3.6 and 21.6 standard cubic meters per 100 liters),
generally, and 300 to 1,000 SCF/B (5.4 to 18 standard cubic meters
per 100 liters), preferably. Hydrogen pressure requirements for
this invention are very low. Generally, only sufficient pressure to
move the reactants through the system at the required space
velocity will be adequate. A wide variety of Group VI and Group
VIII catalytic metals are suitable for the present invention. For
example, nickel-cobalt-molybdenum on alumina, cobalt-molybdenum,
nickel-tungsten or nickel-molybdenum. The support can be alumina,
alumina-silica or silica-magnesia, as long as non-cracking
conditions are employed.
To illustrate the present invention, in one domestic refinery
operation for the preparation of both No. 2 home heating fuels and
also kerosenes boiling broadly in the 350.degree. to 700.degree.F.
(176.degree. to 371.degree.C.) range or, more narrowly, in the
400.degree. to 650.degree.F. (204.degree. to 343.degree.C.) range,
the refinery was supplied by five different feed stocks boiling
within these ranges originating from different crude sources. These
five feed stocks are described in Table 1. Two of the feed stocks,
a straight run West Texas kerosene and a West Texas straight run
furnace oil did not meet commercial requirements in regard to total
sulfur content and therefore required high pressure
hydrodesulfurization. A furnace oil from a distillation column to
which an Ordovician crude was fed contained only 0.11 weight
percent total sulfur, meeting commercial specifications, but
contained 0.041 weight percent of mercaptans and had a total acid
number less than 0.03, thereby failing to meet commercial
specifications in regard to mercaptan content (30 ppm maximum)
only, while meeting commercial specifications in regard to total
acid number (0.1 maximum). A furnace oil from a distillation column
to which a South Louisiana crude was supplied contained only 0.10
weight percent total sulfur thereby meeting commercial
specifications, contained a mercaptan sulfur content of 0.0004,
also meeting commercial specifications, but had a total acid number
of 0.46-7, which is above the commercial specification of 0.1. A
kerosene derived from a South Louisiana crude met commercial
specifications in regard to total sulfur, mercaptan content, but
not in regard to total acid number, having a total acid number of
0.12 which exceeds the maximum allowable 0.10 commercial
specification. The various feed stocks shown in Table 1 show that
it is possible for a straight run middle distillate feed stock to
meet commercial specifications in regard to total sulfur content
and in regard to total acid number, but not in regard to mercaptan
sulfur content. It is also possible for a straight run feed stock
to meet commercial specifications in regard to total sulfur content
and mercaptan sulfur content, but not in regard to total acid
number. It is also possible for a straight run middle distillate to
meet commercial specifications in regard to total sulfur content
but not in regard to either total acid number or mercaptan sulfur
content.
In accordance with the present invention, any straight run feed
stock which fails to meet commercial specifications in regard to
total sulfur content must be treated in a high pressure vessel
capable of accommodating a pressure of 600 to 1,000 psig (42 to 70
kg/cm.sup.2) or more and a temperature of 680.degree.F.
(360.degree.C.) or more to accomplish hydrodesulfurization in the
presence of a highly active hydrodesulfurization catalyst, such as
a Group VI and Group VIII metal on a non-cracking support, such as
alumina, with or without less than about 1 percent of a
non-cracking stabilizing amount of silica, usually in
downflow-operation of feed oil and hydrogen. Common catalytic
metals include nickel, cobalt, molybdenum, tungsten, etc., in
various combinations. However, we have now found that straight run
middle distillates which meet commercial total sulfur requirements
but fail to meet commercial requirements in regard to total acid
number and/or mercaptan sulfur content can be charged to a separate
reactor, and at a relatively lower temperature which is always
below 650.degree.F. (343.degree.C.), operated at a much lower
pressure, such as 100 psig (7 kg/cm.sup.2), or less, with the same
or a similar catalyst as was used in the high pressure
hydrodesulfurization reactor as a downflow, compact bed but in a
permanently deactivated state in regard to the requirements of the
high pressure reactor. In this manner, a smaller total flow is
passed through the high pressure reactor, said flow being
diminished by the feed charged directly to the low pressure
reactor, permitting the diameter of the high pressure reactor to be
greatly reduced. Since the thickness of the steel wall which is
required in a high pressure and high temperature reactor increases
greatly with reactor diameter (by contrast, it is known that a
thin-walled copper tube can withstand thousands of pounds of
pressure if its diameter is only about one-quarter of an inch or
0.63 cm), the present invention permits the high pressure and
temperature reactor to be constructed with a smaller diameter and
also with a greatly diminished metal thickness, resulting in
considerable economic savings. Since the feed streams bypassing the
high pressure reactor are hydrotreated at only 100 psig (7
kg/cm.sup.2) or less, and at a lower temperature, i.e. below
500.degree. or 450.degree.F. (260.degree. or 232.degree.C.), than
the high pressure reactor, the low pressure reactor will have a
greatly reduced steel thickness, as compared to the high pressure
reactor, resulting in a considerable overall savings in the
fabrication costs in the metal reactors.
The detailed characteristics of the five middle distillate feed
stocks described above are shown in Table 1, below.
TABLE 1
__________________________________________________________________________
LOW SEVERITY HYDROTREATING CHARGE INSPECTIONS South South West West
Ordovician Louisiana Louisiana Texas Texas Furnace Oil Furnace Oil
Kerosene Kerosene Furnace Oil
__________________________________________________________________________
Inspections Gravity, D287: API 43.9 36.5 43.3 40.0 36.9
Distillation, D86: .degree.F. Over Point 321(160.degree.C.)
361(183.degree.C.) 331(166.degree.C.) 340(171.degree.C.)
338(170.degree.C.) End Point 617(325.degree.C.) 654(345.degree.C.)
496(258.degree.C.) 567(297.degree.C.) 708(375.degree.C.) 5%
372(189.degree.C.) 424(218.degree.C.) 359(182.degree.C.) -- -- 10%
385(196.degree.C.) 446(230.degree.C.) 367(186.degree.C.)
393(201.degree.C.) 413(212.degree.C.) 20% 407(208.degree.C.)
480(249.degree.C.) 375(191.degree.C.) -- -- 30% 423(217.degree.C.)
496(258.degree.C.) 383(195.degree.C.) -- -- 40% 443(228.degree.C.)
508(264.degree.C.) 390(199.degree.C.) -- -- 50% 463(240.degree.C.)
520(271.degree.C.) 399(204.degree.C.) 452(233.degree.C.)
499(259.degree.C) 60% 487(253.degree.C.) 532(278.degree.C.)
408(209.degree.C.) -- -- 70% 513(267.degree.C.) 548(287.degree.C.)
419(215.degree.C.) -- -- 80% 541(283.degree.C.) 566(297.degree.C.)
432(222.degree.C.) -- -- 90% 573(300.degree.C.) 596(313.degree.C.)
452(233.degree.C.) 520(271.degree.C.) 630(332.degree.C.) 95%
595(313.degree.C.) 622(328.degree.C.) 466(241.degree.C.) -- --
Sulfur, weight percent .11 .10 -- .69 .92 Sulfur, ppm -- -- 267 --
-- Mercaptan Sulfur, D1323: weight percent .041 .0004 .0006 .127
.11 Total acid number, D974 <.03 .47 .12 .06 -- Total acid
number, D664 -- .46 -- -- -- Bromine number, D1159 -- -- -- 6.7 7.4
__________________________________________________________________________
No additional catalyst cost is required for operation of the low
pressure reactor, which is the reactor of the present invention,
since it operates with catalyst that has been deactivated by
repeated regenerations in the high pressure reactor until it is no
longer of commercial utility in the high pressure reactor. The
deactivated high pressure catalyst is sulfided if required in the
high pressure reactor prior to withdrawal therefrom at a
temperature of about 600.degree. to 650.degree.F. (315.degree. to
343.degree.C.) by passage of high sulfur-content oil therethrough.
If required, it can also be regenerated by combustion in the high
pressure reactor. Then the catalyst can be removed from the high
pressure reactor by any suitable means, such as through a plug in
the bottom thereof. The catalyst for reuse in the low pressure
reactor can comprise the catalyst from the high pressure reactor in
its entirety, or, since feed oil is passed downwardly through the
high pressure reactor, the reused catalyst can comprise only the
bottom bed of a multiplicity of beds, or can comprise a portion of
a single bed contained in the high pressure reactor, omitting the
uppermost region of the bed, thereby utilizing in the low pressure
reactor only the cleanest, most metals-free portion of the catalyst
from the high pressure reactor. It is possible to utilize the
entire bed from the high pressure reactor in the low pressure
reactor if the total amount of catalyst is required in the low
pressure reactor and if the average contamination of the total
catalyst bed in the high pressure reactor is not excessive. The
catalyst removed from the high pressure reactor is then replaced by
a similar amount and quality of fresh catalyst.
Table 2, below, shows the test conditions employed and the results
obtained when the first three feed stocks listed in Table 1 (which
already met commercial total sulfur requirements and therefore did
not require high pressure hydrodesulfurization) were treated under
the low pressure hydrogen test conditions of this invention with
aged (deactivated) catalysts for the reduction of mercaptan sulfur
content and/or total neutralization number only. In all tests, the
feed oil and hydrogen were passed downwardly over a fixed,
stationary, compact catalyst bed.
TABLE 2
__________________________________________________________________________
LOW SEVERITY HYDROTREATING WITH AGED CATALYSTS SUMMARIZED CHARGE
STOCK AND TYPICAL PRODUCT INSPECTIONS
__________________________________________________________________________
Ordovician South Louisiana South Louisiana Feed From Table 1
Furnace Oil Furnace Oil Kerosene
__________________________________________________________________________
Operating Conditions: Catalyst Aged Aged Aged Reactor Temperature:
.degree.F. 500(260.degree.C.) 475(246.degree.C.) 450(232.degree.C.)
Reactor Pressure: psig 100(7 kg/cm.sup.2) 100(7 kg/cm.sup.2) 100(7
kg/cm.sup.2) Space Velocity: Vol/Hr/Vol 4.0 4.0 4.0 Gas Circulation
Rate: SCF/B FF 1000 1000 1000 (18 m.sup.3 /100 liters) (18 m.sup.3
/100 liters) (18 m.sup.3 /100 liters) Gas Hydrogen Content: Volume
percent 85 85 85 Liquid Product Yield: Volume percent FF 100 100
100 Hydrogen Sulfide Yield: Weight percent FF 0.06 0.04 0.01 Fresh
Hydrotreated Fresh Hydrotreated Fresh Hydrotreated Feed Product
Feed Product Feed Product
__________________________________________________________________________
Inspections Gravity, D287: API 43.9 43.8 36.5 36.3 43.3 43.2
Distillation, D86: .degree.F. Over Point 321(161.degree.C.)
338(170.degree.C.) 361(182.degree.C.) 357(181.degree.C.)
331(166.degree.C.) 340(171.degree.C.) 2 End Point
617(325.degree.C.) 629(332.degree.C.) 654(345.degree.C.)
629(332.degree.C.) 496(258.degree.C.) 503(262.degree.C.) 3 10%
385(196.degree.C.) 388(198.degree.C.) 446(230.degree.C.)
446(230.degree.C.) 367(186.degree.C.) 369(187.degree.C.) . 30%
423(217.degree.C.) 431(222.degree.C.) 496(258.degree.C.)
495(257.degree.C.) 383(195.degree.C.) 385(196.degree.C.) 50%
463(239.degree.C.) 474(245.degree.C.) 520(271.degree.C.)
519(271.degree.C.) 399(204.degree.C.) 401(205.degree.C.) 70%
513(267.degree.C.) 523(273.degree.C.) 548(287.degree.C.)
545(285.degree.C.) 419(215.degree.C.) 420(215.degree.C.) 90%
573(301.degree.C.) 583(306.degree.C.) 596(313.degree.C.)
595(313.degree.C.) 452(233.degree.C.) 451(233.degree.C.) Mercaptan
Sulfur, D1323: weight percent 0.041 0.0009 0.0004 -- 0.0006 --
Total Acid Number, D974 <0.03 -- 0.47 0.03 0.12 <0.03 Sulfur,
ppm -- -- -- -- 267 186 Sulfur, weight percent 0.11 0.05 0.10 0.06
-- -- Color, Saybolt, D156 +14 +17 -2 +10 +26 +30
__________________________________________________________________________
Table 2 shows that the present process improves not only mercaptan
sulfur content and total acid number but also improves color
properties of the feed oil. It also shows there is substantially
100 percent yield of furnace oil or kerosene in the present
process.
Table 3, presented below, presents additional test data and product
specifications when treating the Ordovian furnace oil under still
other single pass conditions than those shown in Table 2.
TABLE 3 ______________________________________ LOW SEVERITY
HYDROTREATING OF ORDOVICIAN FURNACE OIL
______________________________________ OPERATING CONDITIONS
______________________________________ Catalyst NiCoMo-on-alumina -
Aged Volume: cc 262.0 Weight: gms 238.9 Age Days 34.5 BBL/LB FF
12.5 (.004353 m.sup.3 /g) Period Length: hours 63.0 Operating
Conditions Reactor Temperature: .degree.F. 430.0 (221.degree.C.)
Reactor Pressure: psig 101.0 (7.07 kg/cm.sup.2) Space Velocity FF
Vol/Hr/Vol 3.98 Wt/Hr/Wt 3.53 Reactor Gas FF SCF/BBL 604.0 (10.9
SCM/100L) Hydrogen Content: percent by volume 85.6 Weight Balance
O/I: percent 99.6 Hydrogen Consumption: SCF/BBL FF 14.0 Unit (0.25
SCM/100L) Unit Yields: percent by weight of FF Furnace Oil 100.0
Naphtha -- Hydrocarbons in Exit Gases 0.0 Unit Yields: percent by
volume of FF Furnace Oil 100.3 Naphtha -- Hydrocarbons in Exit
Gases 0.0 Off Gas Hydrogen Sulfide: percent by volume 0.1
______________________________________
Therefore, in the present process, there is essentially no removal
of sulfur atoms from the interior of molecules as occurs in high
pressure hydrodesulfurization with high sulfur-content feeds and
which splits the feed molecules into lower molecular weight
fragments boiling in the naphtha range, or lower.
The catalyst employed in all the tests was NiCoMo-on-alumina which
was previously deactivated in high pressure (600 psig or 42
kg/cm.sup.2) hydrodesulfurization runs employing straight-run
middle distillate oil feed stocks which failed to meet the 0.2
weight percent total sulfur specifications. An example of the
extent of deactivation of such a catalyst in a high pressure
process is illustrated in FIG. 7. The tests illustrated in FIG. 7
were performed at a temperature of 620.degree. - 700.degree.F.
(326.degree.-371.degree.C.), 600 psig (42 kg/cm.sup.2), 5.85 LHSV
with 900 SCF/B (16.2 SCM/100L) of 85 percent hydrogen reactor gas.
The charge oil was a West Texas furnace oil containing 0.98 weight
percent sulfur. The first cycle of the high pressure (600 psig or
42 kg/cm.sup.2) hydrodesulfurization catalyst exhibited the upper
temperature response curve shown in FIG. 7, while the lower curve
of FIG. 7 shows the temperatures response characteristics in the
fifth cycle of the catalyst with the same feed, with combustion
regeneration between cycles, after which 268 barrels of oil per
pound of total catalyst (0.094 m.sup.3 /g) was passed through the
reactor. FIG. 7 shows the aged catalyst was 50.degree. -
60.degree.F. (27.8.degree. - 33.3.degree.C.) less active than the
fresh catalyst in the 620.degree. to 700.degree.F. (327.degree. to
371.degree.C.) reactor temperature range in which the catalyst was
aged. Each regeneration of the catalyst results in a higher
required start-of-run temperature and a shorter time of operation
in the subsequent cycle.
The aged catalyst was then presulfided in the high temperature and
pressure hydrodesulfurization reactor with Ordovician furnace oil
for 12 hours at 650.degree.F. (343.degree.C.), 4.0 LHSV at 1,000
psig (70 kg/cm.sup.2). Thereupon, it was employed as a catalyst in
the low temperature and pressure reactor of this invention with the
results shown in the following figures.
FIG. 1 shows the relationship in the process of the present
invention between non-mercaptan or total sulfur content reduction
and mercaptan desulfurization number reduction in tests conducted
at 100 psig (7 kg/cm.sup.2), 400.degree. to 650.degree.F.
(204.degree. to 343.degree.C.), 4-8 LHSV, 300 - 1,000 SCF (85
percent H.sub.2)/B (5.4-18 SCM/100L). The solid circles of FIG. 1
represent the Ordovician furnace oil feed of Table 1 while the
crosses indicate the West Texas kerosene feed of Table 1. As shown
in FIG. 1, the process of this invention removed about 90 weight
percent of the mercaptan sulfur before removing only about 15
percent of the total sulfur content of the feed, showing the high
selectivity of the present process for removal of mercaptan sulfur
while not removing total sulfur. FIG. 1 shows a 50 percent
reduction in mercaptan sulfur content occurred with only about 1 or
2 percent reduction in total sulfur content.
FIG. 2 shows the relationship between nonmercaptan or total
desulfurization and percent reduction in total acid number with
tests conducted under the conditions of the present invention which
include 100 psig (7 kg/cm.sup.2), 400.degree. to 650.degree.F.
(204.degree. to 343.degree.C.), 4-8 LHSV and 300 - 1,000 SCF (85
percent H.sub.2)/B (5.4 - 18 SCM/100L). In FIG. 2, the crosses
indicate the South Louisiana kerosene feed of Table 1 and the solid
circles indicate the South Louisiana furnace oil feed of Table 1.
FIG. 2 shows that the process of the present invention is capable
of reducing the total acid number of a feed oil by at least 80
percent while reducing the total sulfur content of the oil only 20
percent, again showing the high selectivity of the present process
for treatment of low total sulfur-containing oils. FIG. 2 shows a
50 percent reduction in total acid number occurred with less than
about a five percent reduction in total sulfur content.
FIGS. 1 and 2 both show that the reduction in mercaptan sulfur
content and the reduction in total acid number both occur much more
readily than the undesired total desulfurization reaction. FIGS. 1
and 2 show that 90-95 percent mercaptan desulfurization and 80
percent total acid number reduction occur with only 20 percent
total desulfurization.
FIG. 3 illustrates the results of a similar test with the same aged
catalyst at 100 - 150 psig (7 - 10.5 kg/cm.sup.2). The solid
circles represent a heavy FCC naphtha feed (not illustrated in
Table 1), the hollow circles represent the West Texas kerosene feed
of Table 1, and the triangles represent the West Texas furnace oil
feed of Table 1. FIG. 3 shows that, the saturation of olefins
occurs at even a slower rate than non-mercaptan or total
desulfurization, i.e., at 20 percent total desulfurization only
about 6 percent olefin saturation occurred. Therefore, the
conditions of the present invention are too mild to accomplish
significant olefin saturation. This is an important feature of the
present invention because, assuming a typical middle distillate
feed contained 1 percent olefin by volume, the saturation of these
olefins alone would account for a chemical hydrogen consumption of
about 9 SCF/B (0.162 SCM/100L).
FIGS. 4, 5 and 6 show results obtained with a fresh hydrogenation
catalyst having a similar composition as that employed in the tests
of the other Figures, except that the catalyst represented by the
lowest curve of FIG. 4 was previously aged for two cycles in a
prior high pressure hydrogenation process. These figures show that
the present invention can be practiced with a fresh as well as an
aged catalyst, although the fresh catalyst will require milder
conditions to maintain the low hydrogen consumption levels of this
invention. In FIGS. 4, 5A and 5B the feed stock is the Ordovician
furnace oil of Table 1. The tests of FIG. 4 were performed with a
circulation of 1,000 SCF/B (18 SCM/100L) of 85 percent hydrogen at
the temperatures, pressures and space velocity conditions
indicated. FIG. 4 shows that in accordance with the present
invention the feed mercaptan sulfur content can be reduced from a
value of 410 in the original feed stock to values as low as 8, 10
or 20 ppm at 450.degree.F. (232.degree.C.), and can be reduced to a
value approaching 0 ppm at a temperature of 500.degree.F.
(260.degree.C.). FIG. 4 shows very little advantage in increasing
the pressure from 100 to 200 psi (7 to 14 kg/cm.sup.2) for removal
of mercaptan sulfur. FIG. 4 also shows that more than 90 percent
mercaptan removal occurred in the process for the feed oil to meet
the commercial specification of 30 ppm mercaptan content.
FIGS. 5A and 5B, represent tests made with the Ordovician furnace
oil feed of Table 1 and show that hydrogen circulation rate does
not have a great effect upon the achievement of 30 ppm of mercaptan
sulfur in the oil at the conditions tested.
The tests of FIG. 6 were made with the South Louisiana furnace oil
of Table 1 at 100 psig (7 kg/cm.sup.2) with 1,000 SCF/B (18
SCM/100L) of 85 percent hydrogen. These tests show that feed total
acid number can be reduced in a feed which had a value of 0.47, to
a value of 0.1 at temperatures below 450.degree. to 500.degree.F.
(232.degree. to 260.degree.C.) depending upon space velocity. FIG.
6 shows that nearly 80 percent reduction in acid content occurred
in the process for the feed oil to meet the commercial
specification of 0.1 total acid number.
FIGS. 4, 5A, 5B and 6 illustrate that a wide range of low severity
temperature, pressure and space velocity conditions can be employed
with a hydrodesulfurization catalyst to accomplish the required
commercial low mercaptan sulfur content and low total acid number
values in accordance with this invention.
As stated above, commercial specifications for No. 2 furnace oil
require a maximum total sulfur content of 0.2 weight percent sulfur
for home heating fuel, a maximum mercaptan content of 30 ppm (0.003
weight percent) and a total acid number of less than 0.1. Total
acid number is defined as milligrams of potassium hydroxide (KOH)
that is required to neutralize all acidic constituents present in 1
gram of oil sample (mg KOH/gm sample), according to ASTM test D664
or D974, 1968 Book of ASTM Standards, Volume 17, page 235. About
the same results are obtained in total acid number when ASTM test
method D974, which employs colorimetric titration, is employed, as
in the case of method D664, which employs potentiometric titration.
Mercaptan sulfur content is defined as grams of mercaptan sulfur
per 10.sup.6 grams of oil.
It is seen that of the middle distillates listed in Table 1, only
the West Texas middle distillates contained more than commercial
specifications in regard to total sulfur content. Therefore, it is
necessary to hydrodesulfurize these oils at a pressure above 600
psig (42 kg/cm.sup.2), and preferably in the 1,000 to 2,000 psig
(70 to 140 kg/cm.sup.2) range disclosed above to reduce their
sulfur content to 0.2 weight percent sulfur. However, the
Ordovician middle distillate and the South Louisiana middle
distillates both meet commercial total sulfur content requirements
and therefore do not require severe hydrodesulfurization to
accomplish reduction of total sulfur content. However, under the
practice of the prior art, the Ordovician and South Louisiana
middle distillates would have been blended with the West Texas
middle distillates to obtain a total refinery middle distillate
blend for feeding to the high pressure hydrodesulfurization unit
because under the severe hydrogenation conditions required for the
reduction of total sulfur content of the West Texas middle
distillates, the 410 ppm mercaptan content of the Ordovician middle
distillate would easily be reduced to the commercially acceptable
30 ppm mercaptan content and the 0.46-7 total acid number of the
South Louisiana middle distillates would easily be reduced to the
commercially acceptable total acid number of less than 0.1.
However, in accordance with the present invention, virgin middle
distillates, prior to hydrogenation or other treatment, in which
state they ordinarily contain less than one percent olefin, are not
sent to the high pressure hydrodesulfurizer but rather are
hydrotreated in a separate reactor under much more economic and
mild conditions at a great savings of space in the high pressure
reactor. This practice is based upon our discovery that for
straight run middle distillates the severity of the operation
required for the reduction of total acid number and the reduction
of mercaptan sulfur content by hydrotreatment is much milder than
is required for the reduction of total sulfur content.
The following calculations are presented to illustrate that
relatively minuscule quantities of chemical hydrogen consumption
are required to accomplish the required reductions in total acid
number and mercaptan sulfur content in accordance with this
invention.
To reduce the total acid number via hydrogenation, the most
prevalent reaction involved is the reaction of an organic
naphthenic acid with hydrogen to produce a saturated hydrocarbon
plus water, according to the following equation: ##SPC1##
From this equation it is seen that three moles of hydrogen are
required to saturate one mole of organic acid. The hydrogenation
method of neutralization is the method employed in accordance with
the present invention.
The ASTM neutralization test method reacts the organic acid with
KOH to produce a salt plus water according to the equation:
##SPC2##
It is seen from this equation that one mole of KOH is required to
neutralize one mole of organic acid.
If the neutralization or total acid number of a feed oil is known,
the amount of hydrogen required to be consumed when reducing the
total acid number to the value required by commercial
specifications can be calculated as follows:
Total acid number = mg KOH/gram sample
.sub.oil = density of sample, gm/cc
Molecular weight of KOH = 56,108 mg/mole
.DELTA.total acid number = reduction in total acid number (total
acid number of untreated oil minus the acid number of the treated
product) ##SPC3##
To convert SCF H.sub.2 /Bbl oil to SCM/100L multiply by 0.018.
In an actual example based on the South Louisiana middle distillate
of Table 1 which has a total acid number of 0.46 wherein the
specific gravity of the oil was 36.5 .degree.API (0.8423 g/cc), to
reduce the total acid number (.DELTA.total acid number) from 0.46
to 0.10 (.DELTA. = 0.36) the hydrogen consumption is therefore the
(.DELTA. total acid number) times the density of the oil times
7.10; or
Hydrogen consumption = 0.36 .times. 0.8423 .times. 7.10 = 2.2
standard cubic feet of hydrogen per barrel (0.04 SCM/100L).
It is seen from the above sample calculation that the hydrogen
requirement to reduce the total acid number of the South Louisiana
middle distillate to meet commercial standards is extremely small,
as long as the middle distillate already meets commercial standards
in regard to total sulfur content. Therefore, in accordance with
this invention not more than about 5 or 10 standard cubic feet of
hydrogen per barrel (0.09 to .18 SCM/100L) of middle distillate are
required in terms of chemical hydrogen consumption to reduce total
acid number of an oil sufficiently to meet commercial requirements
of the oil. In terms of total unit hydrogen requirement, including
solubility losses, the requirement in hydrogen need not exceed 15,
20, 25 or 30 standard cubic feet per barrel (0.27, 0.36, 0.45 or
0.54 SCM/100L).
It can be shown that hydrogen requirements for reducing mercaptan
content to commercially acceptable levels by hydrogen treatment in
accordance with the present invention can be even smaller than that
shown above for the reduction of total acid number. The reaction
involved for the reduction of mercaptan sulfur via hydrogenation
proceeds as follows: ##SPC4##
From the above equation, it is seen that two moles of hydrogen are
required for each mole of mercaptan sulfur which is removed.
The analysis of mercaptans is usually presented in units of parts
per million, as follows:
Mercaptan sulfur content = grams mercaptan sulfur/10.sup.6 grams
oil
.DELTA. Mercaptan sulfur content = mercaptan sulfur in charge (ppm)
minus mercaptan sulfur in product (ppm)
Molecular weight of oil = MW.sub.oil grams of oil/grams-mole
oil
Assuming that the molecular weight of the mercaptan compound in the
oil is approximately the same as the molecular weight of the oil,
##SPC5##
To convert SCF H.sub.2 /Bbl to SCM/100L multiply by 0.018.
The Ordovician middle distillate shown in Table 1 contained 410 ppm
of mercaptan. Its API was 43.9.degree. (0.8067 gm/cc). Its mean
average boiling point was 451.degree.F. (233.degree.C.). Its
molecular weight, from .degree.API and mean average boiling point,
is 192. Therefore, to reduce the mercaptan sulfur in the charge
from 0.041 weight percent, or 410 ppm, to a product containing 30
ppm, the hydrogen consumption = (410 - 30) (0.8067) (0.266)/192 =
0.4 standard cubic feet per barrel (0.0072 SCM/100L).
It is seen from the above sample calculation that the hydrogen
requirement to reduce the mercaptan content of the Ordovician
middle distillate to meet commercial standards is extremely small,
as long as the middle distillate already meets commercial standards
in regard to total sulfur content. Therefore, in accordance with
this invention not more than about 5 or 10 standard cubic feet of
hydrogen per barrel of middle distillate (0.09 or 0.18 SCM/100L)
are required in terms of chemical hydrogen consumption to reduce
mercaptan content of an oil sufficiently to meet commercial
requirements of the oil. In terms of total unit hydrogen
requirement, including solubility losses and losses in the hydrogen
off-gas, the requirement in hydrogen need not exceed 15, 20 or 25
standard cubic feet per barrel (0.27, 0.36 or 0.45 SCM/100L).
According to the Oil and Gas Journal, Feb. 17, 1969, Volume 67, No.
7, page 78, hydrogen solubility losses are about 0.4 SCF/B (0.0072
SCM/100L) times the pressure in atmospheres. Therefore, at 100 psi
(7 kg/cm.sup.2) unit pressure, hydrogen solubility losses are 0.4
times 100/15 .apprxeq. 3 SCF/B (0.054 SCM/100L). Table 3 shows
total unit hydrogen requirements of only 14 standard cubic feet per
barrel (0.0252 SCM/100L) when treating the Ordovician middle
distillate of Table 1.
The above two calculations show the actual mercaptan sulfur removal
of acid number reduction is accomplished with hydrogen chemical
consumptions only slightly above zero to less than 3 standard cubic
feet per barrel (0.054 SCM/100L).
It is again seen that for a middle distillate which meets
commercial requirements in regard to total sulfur content, the
hydrogen consumption requirement for the reduction of mercaptan
sulfur to commercially acceptable levels is extremely small and can
be below 1 and generally will not exceed 5 or 10 standard cubic
feet per barrel (0.090 or 0.18 SCM/100L) in terms of chemical
hydrogen consumption, or will not exceed 15, 20 or 25 standard
cubic feet per barrel (0.027, 0.36 or 0.450 SCM/100L) in terms of
total unit hydrogen consumption, including losses. In fact, when a
feed meets commercial total sulfur requirements but does not meet
commercial total acid number requirements or commercial mercaptan
content requirements, the total chemical consumption to meet both
of these requirements should not exceed 5 or 10 standard cubic feet
per barrel (0.09 or 0.18 SCM/100L), or 15 to 25 standard cubic feet
per barrel (0.27 to 0.45 SCM/100L) when solution losses are
considered.
* * * * *