U.S. patent number 3,862,449 [Application Number 05/382,407] was granted by the patent office on 1975-01-21 for ion sleeve for arc lamp electrode.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Varian Associates. Invention is credited to Donald H. Preist, William R. Stuart.
United States Patent |
3,862,449 |
Stuart , et al. |
January 21, 1975 |
ION SLEEVE FOR ARC LAMP ELECTRODE
Abstract
The voltage required to initiate an arc across the electrode gap
in a gas-filled arc lamp can be significantly reduced by providing
a refractory metal sleeve overhanging the tapered end of one of the
electrodes. The direction and extent of the overhang must be such
that the electric field strength at the distal end of the
overhanging portion of the sleeve is greater than at the apex of
the electrode to which the sleeve is affixed.
Inventors: |
Stuart; William R. (San Carlos,
CA), Preist; Donald H. (Menlo Park, CA) |
Assignee: |
Varian Associates (Palo Alto,
CA)
|
Family
ID: |
23508815 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/382,407 |
Filed: |
July 25, 1973 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
313/113; 313/632;
313/356 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H01J
61/86 (20130101); H01J 61/04 (20130101); H01J
61/98 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
H01J
61/00 (20060101); H01J 61/84 (20060101); H01J
61/86 (20060101); H01J 61/04 (20060101); H01J
61/98 (20060101); H05b 037/00 () |
Field of
Search: |
;313/184,198,208,217,326,351,356,357 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Rolinec; Rudolph V.
Assistant Examiner: La Roche; E. R.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Cole; Stanley Z. Herbert; Leon F.
Morrissey; John J.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. An arc lamp comprising an envelope for confining an ionizable
gas, a reflector in said envelope, first and second electrodes
mounted within said envelope on a common axis and being separated
from each other along said axis in non-overlapping arrangement to
form an arc gap between the facing ends of said electrodes, said
first electrode having a generally conical surface at its end which
faces the opposite electrode, said common axis being substantially
parallel to the direction taken by light reflected from said
reflector, said first electrode also having a projecting portion
which extends from the base of said conical surface toward said
gap, whereby an electrical potential between said electrodes will
establish an electrical field which is greater at the distal end of
said projecting portion than at the apex of said first
electrode.
2. The arc lamp of claim 1 wherein said projecting portion
comprises a sleeve forming a continuous annular surface at its end
which projects toward said gap.
3. The arc lamp of claim 1 wherein said projecting portion extends
parallel to said axis.
4. The arc lamp of claim 1 wherein said arc gap, said reflector,
and the projecting end of said projecting portion are positioned
relative to each other such that said projecting end of said
projecting portion intercepts no light from said arc which would
otherwise fall on said reflector.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention is a further development in the art of lowering the
voltage required to initiate an arc between the electrodes of a
gas-filled arc lamp.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Gas-filled arc lamps that are started by the initiation of an arc
between two fixed electrodes are well-known to the prior art. With
such lamps, high voltages are necessary to cause ionization in the
gap between the electrodes. For example, high-intensity arc lamps
of the type described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,731,133, issued May 1,
1973 and assigned to Varian Associates, typically require a
difference of potential on the order of 24 kilovolts to initate an
arc between the anode and the cathode. Such high starting voltages
render likely the possibility of arcing between the electrodes or
their supporting structures and other metallic components of the
lamp. The possibility of arcing between an electrode and the
reflector of the lamp is a particularly detrimental consequence of
such high voltages. A reflector surface typically comprises a thin
metallic coating upon a supporting member, and arcing from an
electrode or electrode support to such a coating could cause
spotting or discoloration of the reflector which would seriously
diminish the optical efficiency of the lamp. Furthermore, the
higher the starting voltage of such a lamp, the longer must be the
axial dimension of the insulating member separating the anode
assembly from the cathode assembly. However, as the axial length of
the insulating member separating the electrode assemblies
increases, the amount of light falling on the insulating member
also increases. Any light falling on an internal component of the
lamp and not reflected out through the lamp window is absorbed and
therefore lost. Hence, any decrease in the axial length of the
insulating member separating the electrode assemblies will provide
a corresponding increase in the optical efficiency of such a
lamp.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
This invention provides a sleeve structure that can be affixed to
an arc lamp electrode to reduce the voltage required to start the
lamp.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
FIG. 1 shows a cross-sectional view of an arc lamp embodying the
ion sleeve of this invention, and also shows rays of light from the
brightest spot of the arc of such a lamp.
FIG. 2 shows an end view of one embodiment of the ion sleeve of
this invention affixed to either the anode or the cathode of an arc
lamp.
FIG. 3 shows an end view of another embodiment of the ion sleeve of
this invention affixed to either the anode or the cathode of an arc
lamp.
FIG. 4 shows a schematic view of the electric field between the
electrodes of the arc lamp of FIG. 1, with the left-hand portion of
FIG. 4 showing equipotential lines for the electric field of a lamp
embodying the ion sleeve of this invention and the right-hand
portion showing equipotential lines for the electric field of a
lamp without the ion sleeve of this invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
The lamp shown in FIG. 1 is substantially similar in most respects
to that described in the U.S. Pat. No. 3,731,133 referred to above,
and for purposes of this disclosure is illustrative of any
gas-filled arc lamp that is started by the application of a
difference of electrical potential between two fixed electrodes.
The present invention is not restricted in its applicability to an
arc lamp of the design shown in FIG. 1, but will find general
applicability in any gas-filled arc lamp that provides for a
difference of potential to be applied between a fixedly positioned
cathode and a fixedly positioned anode to ionize a gas in the gap
between these two electrodes.
The lamp 1 shown in FIG. 1 has a cathode 2 and an anode 3, which
are electrically insulated from each other by a ceramic insulator
4. Insulator 4 is cylindrically configured, with a reflector-shaped
concavity 5 in one end symmetrically disposed about the cylindrical
axis thereof. The surface 6 of the concavity 5 is typically coated
with a reflective metallic coating, as by a vapor deposition
process, to provide maximum reflectance of light impinging thereon.
The end of insulator 4 opposite the concavity 5 has a hole 7
symmetrically disposed with respect to the axis of the insulator 4
and extending into concavity 5 to provide communication from one
end of insulator 4 through to the other end. Cathode 2 is fixedly
mounted on supporting struts 8 which are brazed to a ring 9, which
is itself brazed to a surrounding annular structure 10. Annular
structure 10 supports not only the cathode mounting members 8 and 9
but also a window with its mounting members (not numbered). The
surface 6 of concavity 5, as well as annular structure 10, window
11 and certain window mounting members (not numbered), partially
define an envelope for confining an ionizable gas, which is
typically xenon. Anode 3 is mounted on base plate 12 and extends
through hole 7 into concavity 5. Base plate 12 completes the
envelope for confining the ionizable gas. Both cathode 2 and anode
3 are elongate along the axis of insulator 4, and the tip 13 of
cathode 2 is fixedly positioned with respect to the focus of
reflective surface 6. The lamp 1 is most conveniently operated with
cathode 2 being maintained at ground potential, inasmuch as cathode
2 is in electrical contact with annular structure 10 which serves
to cover and protect the front end of the lamp. Therefore, a
difference of potential is applied between cathode 2 and anode 3 by
applying a voltage to anode 3 through base plate 12. It is
important that a positive voltage be applied to base plate 12, so
that electrode 3 will function as the anode rather than as the
cathode. In an arc between a cathode and an anode, the brightest
portion of the arc is a small region immediately adjacent the tip
of the cathode. Most of the light from the arc originates from this
so-called "hot spot." In order to maximize the amount of light
reflected out through the lamp window, it is necessary to fixedly
position the tip of the cathode with respect to the focus of the
reflector so that the hot spot remains constantly at the focus of
the reflector during lamp operation. In the lamp design shown in
FIG. 1, the forward electrode 2 is supported by struts 8 in such a
way that relative movement of the electrode tip 13 with respect to
the focus of reflective surface 6 is substantially prevented as the
various components of the lamp thermally expand and contract.
Details of this electrode mounting technique are provided in U.S.
Pat. No. 3,725,714, issued Apr. 3, 1973 and assigned to Varian
Associates. On the other hand, for the way rear electrode 3 is
mounted, as shown in FIG. 1, relative movement of the arc end of
rear electrode 3 with respect to the focus of the reflective
surface 6 during lamp operation cannot be prevented. Thus, it is
important that forward electrode 2 function as the cathode and that
rear electrode 3 function as the anode.
Once a lamp of the type shown in FIG. 1 is in operation, a very low
voltage on the order of 20 volts is all that is needed to maintain
operation. However, to initiate the arc across the electrodes in
order to start the lamp, a voltage on the order of 24 kilovolts is
typically needed. The actual required starting voltage will depend
upon the particular configuration of the components of the lamp and
on the type and pressure of the gas used. The required starting
voltage is usually applied in the form of a pulse of short
duration.
In general, it is always desirable to reduce the starting voltage
requirements for arc lamps that are to be used, for example, in
aviation, industrial or medical applications. The higher the
voltage requirements, the more costly the necessary power supplies
become. Also, the higher the difference of potential between the
electrodes, the more likely is there to occur arcing from the
electrodes or electrode supports to other metallic components of
the lamp. The greater the likelihood of such arcing, the greater is
the uncertainty that the lamp will start when the starting circuit
is energized. Furthermore, arcing between an electrode or an
electrode support and the reflector is likely to cause pitting and
discoloration of the reflector with consequent diminution in the
reflectance of the reflector surface. For a lamp as shown in FIG.
1, the higher the difference of potential between the cathode 2 and
the anode 3, the greater must be the total length of the
nonmetallized internal portions of insulator 4 in its axial
dimension, (e.g., the portion between points 16 and 17 and the
portion between points 18 and 19 of the lamp shown in FIG. 1).
However, the greater the axial length of the insulator 4, the
further the window 7 must be located from the hot spot of the arc
and the greater will be the amount of light from the arc falling
upon nonreflective internal components of the lamp. Thus, the
optical efficiency of such a lamp could be improved by lowering the
voltage required to start the lamp.
It has been found that by providing an electrode of the lamp shown
in FIG. 1 with a sleeve structure, which is designated herein as an
"ion sleeve," as will be described more fully below, it is possible
to reduce the starting voltage from approximately 24 kilovolts to
approximately 13 kilovolts. The actual amount of reduction in the
required starting voltage for any given lamp will depend upon the
configuration of the components of the lamp. However, for any given
arc lamp design, the starting voltage can be dramatically reduced
by affixing an ion sleeve according to this invention to one of the
electrodes of the lamp.
As illustrated in FIG. 1, ion sleeve 14 is a cylindrical structure
having a continuous sharp-edged surface overhanging the tapered end
of cathode 2. The ion sleeve 14 is made of a refractory metal such
as tungsten, and could be affixed to the electrode by spot-welding.
The extent of the overhang is limited by the fact that light rays
emanating from the arc, and in particular from the hot spot of the
arc, are intercepted by the overhanging portion of the ion sleeve.
To appreciate the fact that the ion sleeve 14 shown in FIG. 1
obstructs a certain portion of the light emanating from the hot
spot of the arc between cathode 2 and anode 3, it is instructive to
consider light rays A, B and C emanating from the hot spot located
immediately adjacent the tip 13 of the cathode 2. Light in the
solid angle .phi. between rays A and C is reflected from reflective
surface 6 out through window 11. Light in the solid angle .theta.
between rays A and B, on the other hand, is obstructed by the
overhanging portion of the ion sleeve 14. However, the obstruction
by ion sleeve 14 of light in the solid angle .theta. is of no
consequence with respect to the optical efficiency of the lamp. If
the ion sleeve 14 were not present, the light in solid angle
.theta. would be absorbed by nonreflective internal components of
the lamp and would never pass out through the window 11. Thus, for
the design illustrated in FIG. 1, the optimum overhang of the ion
sleeve 14 is the amount necessary to intercept all light in the
solid angle .theta. without blocking any light in the solid angle.
.phi. . If the overhang of ion sleeve 14 were to extend into solid
angle .phi. , light would be blocked which would otherwise be
reflected out through window 11, and the optical efficiency of the
lamp would thereby be reduced. If the overhang of ion sleeve 14
were less extensive than as illustrated in FIG. 1, there would be
no diminution in optical efficiency because of the blockage of
light that could otherwise be reflected, but there would be a
diminution in optical efficiency caused by the consequences
discussed above of failing to lower the starting voltage as much as
possible (for reasons that will be discussed hereinafter).
For any given arc lamp design, the optimum configuration and
overhang of the ion sleeve represents a compromise between an
attempt to lower the voltage needed to initiate an arc between the
electrodes and an attempt to reflect as much light as possible out
through the window. Thus, for the design illustrated in FIG. 1, the
cylindrical ion sleeve 14 overhangs the beginning of the tapered
portion of the arc end of cathode 2 by approximately one-quarter of
the distance from the beginning of the tapered portion to the tip
13 of cathode 2. Because of the configuration of the reflective
surface 6 and the other components of the lamp, there is no
advantage in flaring the overhanging portion of the ion sleeve 14.
However, for some particular arc lamp design, a flared overhanging
portion might represent the best compromise between a desired
reduction in starting voltage and a tolerable obstruction of light
rays to the reflector.
For an arc lamp design similar to that illustrated in FIG. 1, with
the additional constraint that the axial length of insulator 4 may
not be as long as that illustrated in FIG. 1, it may be necessary
to extend the overhang of ion sleeve 14 into solid angle .phi. in
order to achieve significant reduction in the starting voltage of
the lamp. In such a situation, a certain diminution in the amount
of light reflected out through the window 11 must be tolerated.
However, in order to allow more light to reach the reflective
surface 6 than would be possible if the ion sleeve 14 were a
continuous surface, it is expedient to cut slots in the overhanging
portion of the ion sleeve 14 as illustrated in the end view
provided in FIG. 2. With a slotted overhanging portion, light in
solid angle .phi. would pass through the slots to the reflective
surface 6, and would be blocked only by the remaining areas of the
overhanging portion. Depending upon the particular configurations
of the various internal components of the arc lamp and on the
relative importance of reduced starting voltage versus maximum
optical efficiency, it may be desirable to make the slots more or
less wide. The limiting case of an ion sleeve having a slotted
overhanging portion would be a crown-like sleeve having sharply
pointed spikes projecting from the electrode to which it is
affixed, as illustrated by the end view shown in FIG. 3.
The ion sleeve of this invention could be advantageously affixed to
the anode rather than to the cathode, as will be shown hereinafter.
If for a particular arc lamp design the amount of light emitted
through the lamp window would not be too severely diminished, it
would be desirable from the standpoint of lowering the starting
voltage to affix an ion sleeve to each of the electrodes. It will
also be appreciated that each of the ion sleeve embodiments
described above could be formed integrally with an electrode rather
than being a separate structure affixed thereto as by
spot-welding.
To understand the effect of the ion sleeve of this invention, it is
instructive to consider the equipotential lines for the electric
field between the anode and the cathode of an arc lamp. The
right-hand side of FIG. 4 shows equipotential lines for an arc lamp
without an ion sleeve, and the left-hand side shows equipotential
lines for the same arc lamp with an ion sleeve. The sharp edge of
the overhanging surface (or the sharp point of a projecting spike
in the case of that embodiment) of the ion sleeve has a radius of
curvature that is much smaller than the radius of curvature of the
tip of the electrode to which the sleeve is attached. Consequently,
there is a steeper gradient for the equipotential lines, and
therefore a higher electric field strength, at the edge of the ion
sleeve than at the tip of the electrode to which the sleeve is
attached. In FIG. 1, there is a greater electric field strength at
the edge 15 of ion sleeve 14 than at the tip 13 of cathode 2, even
though edge 15 is further away than tip 13 is from anode 3.
When the ion sleeve is affixed to the cathode, as illustrated in
FIG. 1, the effect of the ion sleeve is as follows. When a voltage
is applied to the anode, electrons will be emitted very copiously
from the sleeve edge (which is at cathode potential with respect to
the anode) by the well-known field emission process. These emitted
electrons will ionize the gas in the vicinity by the well-known
Townsend avalanche process, with field intensification as
described, for example, in Gaseous Conductors: Theory and
Engineering Applications by J. D. Cobine; Dover Publications, Inc.,
New York, 1958, Chapter 7. Subsequent events leading to the final
steady-state arc discharge between the cathode and the anode may
follow two alternative courses, or a combination of both courses.
According to one alternative, the initial stream of electrons from
the sleeve edge to the anode results in the creation of a number of
positive ions, which travel to the cathode where the kinetic energy
of the impinging positive ions heats the cathode and thereby
releases fresh electrons for migration to the anode. These fresh
electrons create additional positive ions, which in turn impinge
upon the cathode to cause more electrons to be emitted. The process
is repeated until the cathode itself becomes hot enough to emit
electrons copiously by thermiomic emission. According to the other
alternative, a number of positive ions created by the initial
electron stream from the sleeve edge to the anode return to the
sleeve, where they very rapidly set up a self-sustained arc
discharge between the sleeve and the anode. The arc discharge
between the sleeve and the anode rapidly transfers to the gap
between the anode and the cathode due to a combination of electric
and magnetic forces. It is clear that a low work-function surface
on the sleeve would promote field emission, and therefore would
reduce even further the voltage that would be required to initiate
the arc discharge. Thus, when the ion sleeve is affixed to the
cathode electrode, a low work-function surface at the edge of the
sleeve would be highly desirable.
The schematic illustration shown in FIG. 4 represents an ion-sleeve
(of whatever configuration) affixed either to the cathode (as shown
in FIG. 1) or to the anode. The distortion of the electric field
caused by the ion sleeve is the same, whether the sleeve is affixed
to the anode or to the cathode. Where the sleeve is affixed to the
anode, the effect of the sleeve on the initiation of the arc
discharge involves the positive corona phenomenon as described, for
example, in Chapter 8 of Gaseous Conductors: Theory and Engineering
Applications, referred to above. Ionization occurs close to the
sharp edge of the sleeve, because the electric field strength at
the sleeve edge is great enough that the Townsend avalanche process
can produce a high positive ion density even though the initial
electron density is low. Electron emission from the cathode is not
necessary because the natural abundance of free electrons in the
gas (caused, for example, by background radiation) is sufficient.
As in the case where the sleeve is affixed to the cathode, the
positive ions migrate to the cathode, thereby setting up a
self-sustained arc discharge between the sleeve and the cathode.
This arc may very rapidly transfer to the gap between the anode and
the cathode. Alternatively, the positive ions produced close to the
sleeve edge may migrate to cathode, and the electrons thereby
emitted from the cathode may travel directly to the anode rather
than to the sleeve, thereby directly setting up the arc between the
anode and the cathode. It is likely that a combination of both
mechanisms actually occurs. However, it has been found
experimentally that the arc soon stabilizes between the anode and
the cathode and does not persist between the sleeve and the
opposite electrode.
* * * * *