U.S. patent number 3,854,141 [Application Number 05/385,206] was granted by the patent office on 1974-12-10 for zoom interferometer antenna.
This patent grant is currently assigned to United Atlantic Corporation. Invention is credited to Peter W. Smith.
United States Patent |
3,854,141 |
Smith |
December 10, 1974 |
**Please see images for:
( Certificate of Correction ) ** |
ZOOM INTERFEROMETER ANTENNA
Abstract
In surface wave antennas, including single antenna structures
and plural structures comprising two antennas disposed with a
common boresight on opposite sides of a common reference plane
radiating into free space as an interferometer or with a reflector
for monopulse, having exponential aperture distributions A(y) =
Ae.sup.+-.sup..alpha..sup.y the attenuation constant, .alpha., is
altered by altering either the dielectric constant (permitivity),
.epsilon., or the permeability, .mu., of a ferroelectric or
ferromagnetic dielectric wave supporting surface by altering an
electric or magnetic field therein; the gain and beamwidth are
altered by altering the attenuation constant; in the
interferometer, sensitivity or scale factor (difference is
electrical phase per difference in angle of incidence) of incoming
waves varies with variations in .alpha.; a monopulse embodiment
utilizes a reflector, and the squint angle varies with variations
in .alpha..
Inventors: |
Smith; Peter W. (Westport,
CT) |
Assignee: |
United Atlantic Corporation
(East Hartford, CT)
|
Family
ID: |
23520471 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/385,206 |
Filed: |
August 2, 1973 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
343/777; 343/785;
343/787 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H01Q
25/002 (20130101); H01Q 13/26 (20130101); H01Q
3/44 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
H01Q
13/26 (20060101); H01Q 3/44 (20060101); H01Q
13/20 (20060101); H01Q 25/00 (20060101); H01Q
3/00 (20060101); H01q 013/26 () |
Field of
Search: |
;343/753,754,783,785,777,787 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Lieberman; Eli
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Williams; M. P.
Claims
Having thus described a typical embodiment of my invention, that
which I claim as new and desire to secure by Letters Patent of the
United States is:
1. A variable sensitivity, surface wave interferometer antenna
system comprising:
a pair of surface wave antennas each comprising a surface wave
supporting surface comprised of a dielectric material selected from
the group consisting of ferroelectric materials and ferromagnetic
materials and feed means for launching a surface wave on said wave
supporting surface, each of said wave supporting surface structures
being adjacent to a conducting reference plane which is between
said two structures; and
field means for applying to said material of both said antennas a
controllably variable field, selected from the group consisting of
electric fields and magnetic fields, said selected field being an
electric field in the case where said selected material is a
ferroelectric material, said selected field being a magnetic field
in a case where said selected material is a ferromagnetic material,
thereby to alter the attenuation constant of said antenna, the
variation in attenuation constant causing a variation in boresight
sensitivity of said antenna system.
2. The antenna system according to claim 1 wherein said field means
applies an electric field and said material comprises a
ferroelectric dielectric material.
3. The antenna system according to claim 2 wherein said field means
comprises a pair of plates disposed on opposite edges of said wave
supporting surface material of both antennas, and means for
impressing a variable voltage across said plates.
4. The antenna system according to claim 1 wherein said field means
applies a magnetic field and said material comprises a
ferromagnetic dielectric material.
5. The antenna system according to claim 4 wherein said field means
comprises means including a low reluctance ferromagnetic path
portion disposed adjacent to but separated from substantially all
of said wave supporting surface material of both antennas, electric
conductor means passing through the space between said magnetic
path and said material, and means supplying a variable current to
said electrical conductor.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of Invention
This invention relates to antenna structures, and more particularly
to a surface wave antenna having a variable attenuation constant,
and concomitant variable gain, beamwidth and interferometer
sensitivity or monopulse reflector spuint.
2. Description of the Prior Art
In a commonly owned copending application, Ser. No. 385,205, filed
on even date herewith by B. R. Cheo et al, a phase interferometer
antenna system which is capable of unambiguous detection of the
angle of incidence of waves for angles of on the order of
.+-.50.degree. is composed of two antennas disposed about a common
reference plane, each antenna having an exponential aperture
distribution over substantially its entire aperture. A true
exponential aperture distribution provides unambiguous angular
resolution of incoming waves between .+-.90.degree.. As disclosed
in Cheo et al, ideal surface wave antennas inherently provide such
an aperture distribution. However, it is difficult to approach
ideal antenna characteristics with these classes of antennas. The
result is that the scale factor or sensitivity does not diminish
sufficiently off of boresight to provide unambiguous operation
beyond .+-.50.degree..
The utilization of antennas having exponential aperture
distributions as set forth in the aforementioned copending
application is exemplary merely; there are additional applications,
such as where a radiation pattern having small side lobes is
desired.
SUMMARY OF INVENTION
One object of the present invention is to provide surface wave
antennas having an exponential aperture distrubution with
controllably variable attenuation constant, and therefore
controllable gain and beamwidth.
Another object is to provide interferometer antenna systems with a
controllably variable scale factor, or sensitivity.
According to the present invention, the attenuation constant of an
isolated pair of surface wave antennas is controllably altered by
altering the properties of the surface-supporting wave by means of
an applied field. According to the invention in one form, the
constant is controlled in a wave supporting surfaces comprising a
ferromagnetic (such as a ferrite) material by controlling a
magnetic field therein; according to the invention in another form,
the dielectric constant of the wave supporting material is
controlled by controlling an electric field impressed thereon.
In one embodiment of the invention, a pair of variable attenuation
constant surface wave antennas are disposed back-to-back about a
common isolating reference plane so as to form an interferometer
antenna system, the variation in attenuation constant serving to
alter the sensitivity or scale factor (electrical phase difference
as a function of a difference in angle of incidence) of the
interferometer system.
The present invention is readily implemented utilizing techniques
and materials which are well known and readily available. The
invention provides a simple method of adjusting the sensitivity or
scale factor of a dual antenna, interferometer antenna system,
thereby to achieve unambiguous operation over a broader range of
angles of incidence.
Other objects, features and advantages of the present invention
will become more apparent in the light of the following detailed
description of preferred embodiments thereof, as illustrated in the
accompanying drawings .
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
FIG. 1 is a simplified, side elevation view of a surface wave
interferometer antenna system;
FIG. 2 is a plot of aperture distribution of the antenna of FIG.
1;
FIG. 3 is a plot of interferometer antenna sensitivity or scale
factor for various antenna systems;
FIG. 4 is a simplified, schematic, perspective view of an electric
field embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 5 is a partial schematic illustration of a modification of the
current control circuit for the embodiment of FIG. 4;
FIG. 6 is a partial, simplified perspective view of a magnetic
field embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 7 is a partial section taken on the line 7--7 of FIG. 6;
FIG. 8 is a partial, simplified perspective view of a single
antenna, magnetic field embodiment; and
FIG. 9 is a partial schematic illustration of a monopulse
embodiment.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Surface wave antennas are devices which include a surface (or an
effective surface) capable of supporting the propagation of surface
waves together with a suitable feed for launching a wave onto the
surface. Some commonly used structures include dielectric,
ferromagnetic and ferroelectric sheets with or without a ground
plane, dielectric rods, corrugated surfaces, ferrite or plasma
sheets backed by a ground plane, and arrays of proximity-coupled
dipoles, etc. Such antennas, and their characteristics and design
requirements, are now well known, as illustrated by 1) Zucker,
Francis J., "Surface -- And Leaky -- Wave Antennas," Chapter 16 of
Antenna Engineering Handbook (Henry Jasic, Editor), McGraw-Hill,
1961 (Library of Congress Card No. 59-14455), and by 2) IRE
Transactions On Antennas And Propagation, Volume Ap-7, Dec. 1959,
Special Supplement, Pgs. S132-S296.
In the aforementioned Cheo et al application, it is shown, inter
alia, that an interferometer antenna comprising a pair of surface
wave antennas disposed back-to-back about a common reference plane
ideally has a purely exponential aperture distribution in which the
reception response amplitude of the aperture is given as
A(y) = Ae.sup.+-.sup..alpha.y (1)
where
A = maximum aperture amplitude,
e = Naperian operator,
y = distance along aperture from the reference plane,
and
.alpha. = attenuation constant of aperture distribution, a property
of the dielectric material and thickness.
Such an interferometer antenna structure is illustrated briefly in
FIG. 1 to comprise a pair of dielectric wave supporting surfaces
10, 12 disposed about a common conducting reference or ground plane
14, each surface having a wave launched thereon by a related wave
launching mechanism 16, 18 which are connected with waveguides 20,
22 or other suitable feeds. In a theoretical sense, the antenna of
FIG. 1 has an aperture distribution which falls off exponentially
on either side of the reference plane as illustrated in FIG. 2. An
ideal aperture distribution of the type shown in FIG. 2 is shown in
equation (14) of the aforementioned Cheo et al application to
provide a sensitivity or scale factor at boresight (BSF) as
Bsf = 2k.sub.o /.alpha. (2)
where
k.sub.o = 2.pi./.lambda..sub.o
Theoretically, the BSF can be increased to any arbitrarily high
value simply by decreasing the value of the attenuation constant.
In practice, however, as indicated by the dotted line in FIG. 3,
this may cause ambiguity, for instance, whenever electrical phase
differences (.DELTA..phi.) in excess of about 160.degree. are
detected since it is impossible to determine whether they relate to
an angle of between +40.degree. and +60.degree. or an angle below
-60.degree.. On the other hand, if a lower boresight scale factor
is chosen as shown by the solid line in FIG. 3, then the
sensitivity or scale factor can be rendered unambiguous for angles
of incidence (.theta.) between .+-.90.degree.. The dashed line of
FIG. 3 indicates the ideal situation (for an ideal surface wave
antenna) in which a high boresight scale factor can be achieved,
and regardless of how high the boresight scale factor is, the scale
factor (electrical degrees per degree of angle of incidence) will
drop off with increasing angles of incidence such that the phase
difference is unambiguous for any angle of incidence between
-90.degree. and +90.degree..
Thus one utilization of the present invention is to provide a
surface wave interferometer antenna in which the attenuation
constant, .alpha., can be varied so as to supply a high boresight
scale factor under less than ideal conditions as shown in the
dotted line, or unambiguous operation, although with a low
sensitivity, as shown by the solid line of FIG. 3, or variations in
between those two.
Another useful parameter variation which can be achieved by varying
the attenuation constant in accordance with the present invention
is the alteration of the boresight gain, G, of a surface wave
antenna according to the relationship
G .apprxeq. 1/.alpha. (3)
similarly, the beamwidth, B, of a surface wave antenna may
similarly be altered due to the relationship
B .apprxeq. .alpha. (4)
for the case of the surface wave propagating on the ferromagnetic
dielectric (ferrite) in the TM mode, it has been shown in IRE
Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, Volume Ap-6, Jan. 1958
pp. 13-20, R. Pease, "On the Propagation of Surface Waves Over an
Infinite, Grounded Ferrite Slab," that the attenuation constant,
.alpha., is a function of the dielectric constant, .epsilon.; the
dielectric thickness; the free space wavelength, .lambda.; the
operating frequency, f; the gyromagnetic ratio, .gamma.; and the
magnitude of the longitudinal magnetization, .beta., given by:
.alpha. .apprxeq. 4.pi. .sup.2 /.epsilon..lambda. t/.lambda.
[.epsilon.(1 - (.gamma..sup.2 .beta..sup.2 /f.sup.2) - 1] (5)
Also for the case of the surface wave propagating on the
ferroelectric dielectric in the TE mode, it has been shown by Cheo
et al and in Antenna Engineering Handbook (supra) that the
attenuation constant .alpha. is expressed in terms of the surface
wave mode propagation constant, k, and the dielectric thickness, t,
by
.alpha. = - k/tan (kt) (6)
where k is defined in terms of the dielectric constant .epsilon.
and the free space wavelength .lambda. by
k = 1/.lambda. [4.pi..sup.2 (.epsilon.- 1) -
(.alpha..lambda.).sup.2 ].sup.(1/2)
thus giving .alpha. as a function of .epsilon..
Thus, at any given frequency, the attenuation constant, .alpha., is
a function of the magnetization or the dielectric constant of the
material. As is known, the effective magnetization of a
ferromagnetic material may be changed by providing a magnetic field
thereto, and a dielectric constant of any ferroelectric dielectric
material may be altered by the application of an electric field
thereto. The second of these is achieved in an embodiment of the
invention illustrated in FIG. 4, wherein the wave supporting
surfaces comprising dielectric slabs 10, 12 are disposed on
opposite sides of a metallic ground plane 14. However, in this
case, the permitivity, .epsilon..sub.s, of the wave supporting
surface structures 10, 12 can be altered by providing a variable
electric field between a pair of edge-surface conducting plates 26,
28, because the voltage applied therebetween by a pair of lines 30,
32 is adjustable by means of a suitable adjustable voltage divider,
such as a potentiometer 34 connected across a source, such as a
battery 36. Alternatively, as seen in FIG. 5, the voltage between
the lines 30, 32 may be controlled by means of a source of clock
signals 40 periodically energizing an electronic switch, such as a
field effect transistor 42, which shorts out one resistor 44 of a
voltage divider which also includes a resistor 46. The modification
of FIG. 5 will permit use in a digital system, such as a single
antenna modification of a coarse-fine system described in Alcock,
R. N., "A Digital Direction Finder," Phillips Technical Review,
Volume 28, No. 5/6/7, July 1, 1967, pp. 226-230.
Another method for implementing a variable attenuation constant
antenna in accordance with the present invention is illustrated in
FIGS. 6 and 7 which comprises impression of a magnetic field into
ferrite or other ferromagnetic wave supporting surface members 10b,
12b by means of wires 30b, 32b (fed in the same fashion as
illustrated in FIGS. 4 or 5 hereinbefore) which are passed through
a slot 46 formed between two thin conductive planes 14c, 14d (FIG.
7) which are separated by a suitable magnetic material 48, thereby
providing a magnetic path having a lower reluctance at the end of
the surfaces than across the slot 46, such that current flowing
counterclockwise through the wires 32b, 30b, will cause a magnetic
field to the left in the material 10b as shown by the arrow 50 and
a magnetic field to the right in the material 12b and shown by the
arrow 52. The conductive planes 14c, 14d may be formed by vapor
deposition or similar processes and be only of molecular thickness,
and the magnetic path 48 may be on the order of 2 mils high as seen
in FIGS. 6 and 7. A similar magnetic piece is utilized at the
opposite end of the wave launching structure so as to provide a low
reluctance path thereat. The magnetic field alters the complex
magnetic characteristics in a manner to affect the magnetization,
so as to alter .alpha..
Because of the closed magnetic path the magnetization may be
latched, i.e. the remanent magnetization is still considerable when
the current is no longer passing through the wires.
It should be noted that the direction of the electric field or the
magnetic field in either or both of the wave supporting surface
materials is immaterial, but the preferred directions are as
indicated.
A single antenna variation of the embodiments of FIGS. 6 and 7 is
illustrated in FIG. 8. Therein, a low reluctance magnetic structure
48b is shaped so as to provide a return magnetic path in place of
the wave supporting surface structure 12b of FIGS. 6 and 7, the
wave supporting material 10b being provided with a thin conductive
layer 14c across its lowest surface, in the same fashion as is
described with respect to FIGS. 6 and 7 hereinbefore.
Alternatively, a magnetically varied, single, surface wave antenna
may be provided with a solenoid wound coil in the manner
illustrated in FIG. 1 of U.S. Pat. 2,921,308 to R. C. Hansen et al.
However, the present invention differs from Hansen et al in that
Hansen et al requires that the structure be so short as not to
support a surface wave, in order that variations in permeability or
permitivity will cause squinting of the angle of fire of the wave
off the end of the structure; in contrast, the present invention
presupposes a sufficiently large wave supporting surfaces such that
substantially pure surface waves are developed thereon. Stated
alternatively, the device of Hansen et al will not provide the
characteristics of a true surface wave antenna, and therefore will
not provide the relationships of equations (2), (3) and (4)
hereinbefore with respect to variations in the attenuation
constant, .alpha.. Similarly, an electrically varied single antenna
structure is possible by an obvious modification of FIG. 4 in which
the plates 26, 28 are applied to a single wave supporting
structure.
An embodiment illustrated in FIG. 9 shows the embodiments of FIGS.
4, 6, used as a primary feed together with a parabolic reflector
60. It is well known that for purposes of determining the angle of
squint in a parabolic reflector of focal length F, the feed
aperture may be replaced by a point source at its phase center. In
this embodiment the distance d of the phase center from the plane
of reference is given by
d .about. 1/.alpha. (8)
and the squint angle .theta..sub.s is given by
.theta..sub.s .about. d/F (9)
or
.theta..sub.s .about. 1/F.sub..alpha. (10)
it is necessary to point out that it is only in this embodiment
that a beam is squinted, the effect being produced by the geometry
of the combination of the offset feed and the parabolic
reflector.
In a single antenna embodiment (such as that shown in FIG. 8), it
is immaterial whether a ground plane be provided or not, since such
is required in the dual antenna interferometer antenna system
embodiments for proper interferometer operation, rather than
necessarily to support the generation and transmission of surface
waves.
Although the description herein is oriented in terms of launching
waves on the antenna surfaces, in the manner of a transmitter, it
should be understood by those skilled in the art that due to the
reciprocal nature of antennas, all the principles herein are
equally applicable to antennas when receiving signals.
The embodiments of FIGS. 4-7 are exemplary merely, and serve to
illustrate the nature of the present invention. Thus, although the
invention has been shown and described with respect to exemplary
embodiments thereof, it should be understood by those skilled in
the art that the foregoing and various other changes and omissions
in the form and detail thereof may be made therein without
departing from the spirit and the scope of the invention.
* * * * *