U.S. patent number 3,850,589 [Application Number 04/304,002] was granted by the patent office on 1974-11-26 for grinding tool having a rigid and dimensionally stable resin binder.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Sherwin-Williams Company. Invention is credited to Vernon K. Charvat.
United States Patent |
3,850,589 |
Charvat |
November 26, 1974 |
GRINDING TOOL HAVING A RIGID AND DIMENSIONALLY STABLE RESIN
BINDER
Abstract
A grinding tool useful for rapid grinding of a precision cut is
described which comprises a high concentration of abrasive grains
uniformly dispersed in a non-brittle resin binder body which is
rigid and dimensionally stable under the required grinding
pressure.
Inventors: |
Charvat; Vernon K. (Bay
Village, OH) |
Assignee: |
Sherwin-Williams Company
(Cleveland, OH)
|
Family
ID: |
26973763 |
Appl.
No.: |
04/304,002 |
Filed: |
August 23, 1963 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
813377 |
May 15, 1959 |
|
|
|
|
829665 |
Jul 27, 1959 |
|
|
|
|
854468 |
Nov 20, 1959 |
|
|
|
|
12303 |
Mar 2, 1960 |
|
|
|
|
15135 |
Mar 15, 1960 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
51/296; 51/295;
51/298 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B24D
18/00 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
B24D
18/00 (20060101); B24d 003/28 (); B24d
003/32 () |
Field of
Search: |
;51/293,296,295,298 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Arnold; Donald J.
Parent Case Text
This application is a continuation-in-part of my co-pending
applications Ser. No. 813,377, filed May 15, 1959, entitled
"Abrading Tool;" and Ser. No. 829,665, filed July 27, 1959,
entitled "Abrading Tools," the latter being a continuation of the
former. This application is also a continuation-in-part of my
co-pending applications Ser. No. 854,468, filed Nov. 20, 1959,
entitled "Method of Making Articles from Foamed Elastomeric
Material"; Ser. No. 12,303, filed Mar. 2, 1960, entitled
"Composition and Method for Making Grinding Wheels and the Like;"
and Ser. No. 15,135, filed Mar. 15, 1960, entitled "Method of and
Apparatus for Centrifugal Molding", all of which are now abandoned.
Claims
I, therefore, particularly point out and distinctly claim as my
invention:
1. A grinding tool comprising an essentially rigid, dimensionally
stable body of cellular polyurethane resin binder selected from the
group consisting of aromatic polyether polyurethanes and aromatic
polyester polyurethanes, and granular abrasive dispersed uniformly
and embedded therein, the grains comprising such abrasive being
spaced only slightly apart and said resin being capable of slight
local stubborn resilient yielding action to an extent allowing
corresponding slight local individual movement of said grains
exposed at the tool face relative to other adjacent grains in such
face, but said body as a whole being sufficiently rigid to support
the grinding face of said tool to make a grinding cut of precise
predetermined depth under operating pressures in use, such slight
local yielding action of said resin at such grinding face being
sufficient to ensure readjustment of the positions of individual
grains protruding excessively from such face under such operating
pressures to bring such protruding grains into substantially the
same plane as the other adjacent grains in the portion of the tool
face under pressure contact with the work, whereby the work load is
sustained by substantially all said grains across such face,
simultaneously to permit the making of a deep precision cut in the
work by such face while nevertheless producing a relatively smooth
finish thereon and without premature dislodgment of such
excessively protruding grains from such face.
2. The grinding tool of claim 1, wherein said grains are thus
spaced apart approximately one grain diameter, on the average.
3. The grinding tool of claim 1, wherein said tool is in the form
of a grinding wheel.
4. The grinding tool of claim 1, wherein said tool is in the form
of a grinding wheel, and said grains are spaced apart approximately
one grain diameter, on the average.
5. A grinding tool adapted for rapid grinding of a deep
predetermined precision cut in a steel part, said tool
comprising
a non-brittle resin binder body which is rigid and dimensionally
stable under the required grinding pressures thereby to ensure such
precision,
and a high concentration of abrasive grains uniformly incorporated
and embedded in said binder,
substantially all said grains nevertheless being only very slightly
spaced apart in said body
and the latter being just sufficiently locally yieldable under such
grinding pressures at the working face of said tool to afford
individual relative micro-adjustment of said spaced grains exposed
thereat for energy absorption and stress distribution, when such
grains are subjected to heavy impact forces when engaging the work
without appreciable change in the conformation of such working
face.
6. The grinding tool of claim 5 wherein said resin is selected from
the class consisting of polyurethane resin, epoxy resin, phenolic
resin, and silicone resin.
7. The grinding tool of claim 5 wherein said resin is a foamed
resin selected from the class consisting of polyurethane resin,
epoxy resin, phenolic resin, and silicone resin.
8. The grinding tool of claim 5 wherein said resin is a closed cell
foamed resin selected from the group consisting of aromatic
polyether polyurethanes and aromatic polyester polyurethanes.
9. The grinding tool of claim 5 wherein the abrasive content of a
unit volume of said tool by weight is equal to at least
approximately 75 percent of the pack density of the particular
abrasive grains employed.
10. The grinding tool of claim 5 wherein the abrasive content of a
unit volume of said tool by weight is equal to from about 75
percent to about 100 percent of the pack density of the particular
abrasive grains employed, and said body is thus rigid and
dimensionally stable under grinding pressures on the order of at
least 1,000 pounds per square inch.
11. The grinding tool of claim 5 wherein the abrasive grains
constitute from about 30 percent to about 48 percent of the
abrasive-resin body by volume.
12. The grinding tool of claim 5 wherein said resin is foamed resin
selected from the class consisting of polyurethane resin, epoxy
resin, phenolic resin, and silicone resin, and the abrasive content
of a unit volume of said tool by weight is equal to at least
approximately 75 percent of the pack density of the particular
abrasive grains employed.
13. A grinding tool adapted for rapid grinding of a deep
predetermined precision cut in a steel part, said tool
comprising
a non-brittle resin binder body which is rigid and dimensionally
stable under the required griding pressures thereby to ensure such
precision,
and a high concentration of abrasive grains uniformly incorporated
and embedded in said binder,
the abrasive density of said tool in grams per cubic centimeter
being at least 1.28,
substantially all said grains nevertheless being spaced apart in
said body just short of contact with each other,
and the interposed resin of said body being just sufficiently
yieldable to afford individual micro-adjustment of said grains
exposed at the working face of said tool when said tool is
subjected to grinding pressure in use on the order of at least
1,000 pounds per square inch, thereby to achieve energy absorption
and stress distribution when said exposed grains are subjected to
heavy impact forces when engaging the work, without, however,
appreciable change in the dimensions of said body or the
conformation of such working face.
Description
The invention relates as indicated to abrading tools, and more
particularly to rotary abrading tools of the nature of grinding
wheels.
A grinding wheel, in contrast to a polishing or finishing wheel, is
capable of making a cut of substantial depth in a work-piece which
may be of cast iron or steel, for example, and the characteristics
of prior grinding wheels are well known and described, for example,
in "The Grinding Wheel" by Kenneth B. Lewis, published 1959, by The
Grinding Wheel Institute, Cleveland, Ohio. Ordinarily, such
grinding wheels have comprised a mass of densely compacted discrete
abrasive grains bonded together by a molded and fired ceramic
material or a resin bonding agent. Such wheels have been
notoriously difficult of manufacture, requiring very careful
placement of the granular abrasive in a mold and usually rather
lengthy baking or curing periods. Many of them are quite fragile or
brittle and easily fracture if carelessly handled. They also
require frequent dressing to ensure maintenance of the desired tool
face profile to obtain a uniform cut. Those wheels which have been
hard enough to be capable of a fast or deep cutting action such as
is needed for abrasive machining, requiring imposition of high unit
pressures, have not also been capable of simultaneously producing a
surface finish of the quality desired and frequently cause
metallurgical damage to the work. Consequently, in very many cases
a preliminary rough grinding step has required a subsequent
finishing operation and indeed a conventional cutting tool such as
a milling cutter may first be employed followed by a rough grinding
step and then a finishing step.
Polishing tools such as polishing pads and wheels have also been
known in which polishing materials have been incorporated in a body
of readily yielding elastomeric material such as natural and
artificial rubber and various synthetic resins. While suitable for
use in cleaning or polishing operations, such articles have lacked
entirely the dimensional stability and rigidity necessary in a
grinding wheel which must remove stock accurately in amounts
generally measured in thousandths of an inch and which must do so
in a precise path or line of cut to achieve the desired dimension
and geometry of the work.
In contrast to the tools generally described above, I have found
that by the proper placement and concentration of abrasive grains
or granules in a selected resin or plastic binder I have been able
to produce an improved abrasive tool, and particularly a grinding
wheel, wherein the granular abrasive material is disposed within
the binder matrix or body in such manner as to achieve a tool which
is essentially rigid considered as a whole, but wherein the
individual abrasive grains exposed at the working face of the tool
are slightly spaced apart and capable of individual micro-movement
or adjustment relative to each other without being dislodged from
their sockets in the binder, the binder being capable of a limited
amount of local elastic deformation when exceptionally high
pressures are imposed on the individual exposed grains. In
consequence, a grinding tool in accordance with this invention may
be fed rapidly into the work to produce a relatively deep cut
without producing either excessive scoring of the work surface or
prematurely dislodging excessively protruding grains in the tool
face which would result in rapid break-down of the tool profile.
Any such excessively protruding grains are forced inwardly of the
tool face under the operating pressure imposed thereon until
substantially all of the grains exposed in the working face of the
tool bear against and act upon the work; this being achieved,
however, without appreciable distortion of the tool considered as a
whole, so that a dimensionally true cut is produced.
It is accordingly an important object of my invention to provide a
novel abrading tool capable of fast cutting action but which
nevertheless will neither itself break down prematurely or produce
excessive scoring of the work, but instead will produce an
exceptionally good finish for such a rapid cut.
Another object is to provide an abrading tool capable of fast
cutting action to produce a true dimensionally accurate grinding
cut without, however, also producing rapid erosion of the tool
edges (which would necessitate frequent dressing and machine down
time) or causing metallurgical damage to the work.
Still another object is to provide an abrading tool, and especially
a grinding tool, having abrasive grains uniformly slightly spaced
apart in an essentially rigid non-brittle resin to afford a large
number of cutting points exposed at the working face of the tool
which are slightly individually adjustable under working pressures
imposed thereon due to stubborn elastic yielding action of the
resin bond without affecting the essentially rigid character of the
tool body.
A further object is to provide such tool having a multitude of very
small closed cells in the resin bond thus spacing the individual
grains slightly apart and incapable of absorbing water or other
liquid to avoid imbalance of the tool in wet grinding, for
example.
A still further object is to provide an abrading tool such as a
grinding wheel which is not fragile and will not fracture easily
when dropped or otherwise maltreated.
Another object is to provide a method of manufacturing such
abrading tool, and especially a grinding wheel, which is rapid and
inexpensive in that uniformly reproducible results are obtainable
without appreciable production of rejects, utilizing centrifugal
force preliminarily to distribute the granular abrasive material in
a body of liquid resin, with the viscosity of the binder resin
thereupon being increased and a foaming action produced properly to
space the individual grains in the now viscous binder following
cessation of effective centrifuging, such binder then being gelled
or set to the desired rigid but non-brittle condition capable of
local stubborn elastic yielding action when excessive pressure is
imposed upon an individual abrasive granule exposed at the working
face of the tool.
While a variety of resin or plastic bonding agents are suitable for
employment in accordance with my invention and are commercially
available, I particularly prefer certain selected polyurethane
compositions which, when properly employed, evidence the desired
physical characteristics mentioned above. Such polyurethane
compositions are capable of foaming with the assistance of the
small amount of moisture normally present and the various other
resins may be caused to foam through the provision of appropriate
well-known foaming agents activated by means of heat, catalysts and
the like.
To the accomplishment of the foregoing and related ends, said
invention then comprises the features hereinafter fully described
and particularly pointed out in the claims, the following
description and the annexed drawing setting forth in detail certain
illustrative embodiments of the invention, these being indicative,
however, of but a few of the various ways in which the principle of
the invention may be employed.
In said annexed drawing:
FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic elevation partly in cross-section of a
circular mold mounted upon a turntable or centrifuge and adapted
for the production of a rotary abrading wheel in accordance with
the invention;
FIG. 2 is a view similar to FIG. 1 but illustrating a further stage
in the process;
FIG. 3 is a vertical section illustrating a subsequent stage in the
process;
FIG. 4 is a vertical section through the closed mold in the blowing
and gelling or setting stage;
FIG. 5 is a view of a typical abrading wheel produced in accordance
with this invention;
FIG. 6 is a fragmentary transverse section on an enlarged scale
taken on the line 6--6 on FIG. 5;
FIG. 7 is a magnified diagrammatic view indicating the disposition
of the abrasive grains and binder resin during initial
centrifuging;
FIG. 8 is a magnified view similar to FIG. 7 but indicating the
relationship and form of such grains and binder subsequent to
blowing and setting of the binder;
FIG. 9 is a magnified view on the same scale as FIG. 8 showing the
cells formed in the radially inner non-abrasive portion of the
wheel;
FIG. 10 is a magnified diagrammatic view in cross-section showing
only the abrasive grains protruding at the working face of the
tool; and
FIG. 11 is a magnfied diagrammatic view indicating the manner in
which the disposition of such grains is modified by the working
pressure imposed thereon during performance of a grinding
operation.
The preferred method of making the improved tools of the present
invention will first be generally described, reference being had to
the foregoing figures of the drawing. In such description, the
matrix or binder material will generally be referred to as a resin,
or more specifically as a polyurethane composition. It will be
understood, however, that various resins or plastic compositions,
and especially thermosetting plastic compositions may be utilized;
for example: the reaction products of a member selected from the
group consisting of an aromatic polyether and an aromatic polyester
with a polyisocyanate, certain epoxy resin compositions, certain
phenolic resin compositions, and certain silicone resins. In
general, for grinding wheels and the like in accordance with the
present invention which will produce deep accurate cuts at high
feed pressure, a cross-linked polymer or thermosetting resin is
preferred which will produce a rigid infusible dimensionally stable
foam. The abrasive material, certain filler materials, and more
detailed descriptions of the composition of the substantially rigid
dimensionally stable infusible cellular foamed body which
constitutes the preferred matrix or binding material will then be
successively described.
METHOD OF MANUFACTURE
Utilizing the preferred polyurethane resin composition as the
binder material, the abrasive material may be incorporated in the
unreacted or partially reacted polyurethane constituent mixture and
the reaction then completed in an appropriate mold to form the
desired abrading tool such as a grinding wheel. A blowing or
foaming agent will ordinarily be incorporated in the mixture
substantially simultaneously with the incorporation of the abrasive
therein, and the blowing operation which occurs prior to final
setting of the resin assists in accomplishing uniformly spaced
distribution of the abrasive grains through the resin body and in
maintaining such grains in suspension prior to solidification.
Furthermore, the prompt setting of the polyurethane likewise
militates against settling of the grains after these have thus
become properly located.
In the production of many types of abrading tools, and especially
grinding wheels for example, it is preferred to employ a method of
the type diagrammatically illustrated in FIGS. 1-4 inclusive of the
drawing. An annular mold 1 is shown having its base 2 inset in a
turntable 3 adapted to be rotated about its vertical axis by worm
gear unit 4 driven by electric motor 5. The mold is provided with a
removable cover plate 6 having a central opening through which
protrudes an axial stud 7 having a threaded reduced outer end
portion 8. In the initial step of the operation, a measured
quantity of the fluid or unset resin such as the mixture of
polyurethane reactant constituents may be discharged from upper
reservoir 9 into the central opening 10 of the mold cover plate 6
and the turntable 3 is revolved at a speed sufficient to cause the
resin to flow radially outwardly and accumulate in the radially
outer portion of the mold as shown at 11. In this manner,
approximately the radially outer half of the mold may be
filled.
Now referring to FIG. 2 which illustrates a subsequent operation at
the same station, a measured quantity of granular abrasive may next
be discharged from hopper 12 into the rotating mold which will be
rotated at a sufficiently high speed to cause such abrasive to flow
radially outwardly under the influence of centrifugal force into
the previously deposited resin through which it migrates toward the
radially outer periphery or circumferential portion of the mold
cavity, accumulating in uniform manner in the radially outer
circumferential region 13 in concentrated contacting or
substantially contacting relationship with a relatively small
quantity of the resin filling the interstices between the abrasive
grains.
In the next stage of the operation, at the same station, additional
resin may be discharged into the central region of the mold as
shown in FIG. 3, but still ordinarily preferably not entirely
filling the mold cavity. The mold is thus now partially filled with
the resin-abrasive mixture with the abrasive grains uniformly
circumferentially distributed in a radially outer annular region of
the mold and with the remainder of the resin body being
substantially abrasive free. The resin constituents have been
sufficiently liquid to permit such centrifuging but as they
continue to react, the viscosity rapidly increases. Furthermore,
the binder now tends to foam, but such tendency may be largely
inhibited during these preliminary stages of the manufacturing
process due to the centrifugal force imposed on the rapidly
rotating mass. When effective centrifuging is now ceased,
ordinarily by completely stopping rotation of the turntable, a
foaming of the resin body takes place in the now quite viscous
resin, producing relatively small, ordinarily closed cells in the
interstices between the abrasive grains to an extent sufficient to
space the latter apart preferably not more than one grain diameter,
with the entire resin-abrasive body accordingly expanding radially
inwardly of the mold which is centrally vented as previously
indicated. A multitude of small cells are simultaneously generated
in the radially inner non-abrasive portion of the resin body, such
cells ordinarily being smaller than those formed between the
abrasive grains in the outer portion of the mold and having thinner
walls or webs therebetween than the webs between the cells formed
in such outer portion in which the abrasive grains are
embedded.
An annular tapered plug 14 may be employed to close the mold as
shown in FIG. 4, secured by an outer washer 15 and nut 16 threaded
on stud 8. The resin binder within the mold is now permitted to set
or cure, as may be required, to essentially rigid but non-brittle
condition. In the case of the preferred polyurethane resin, the
reaction of the constituent ingredients comprising the same is
permitted to go to completion while left in the mold for from about
2 to 7 hours (depending on the thickness of the abrasive article to
be produced) and heated during this period to approximately
200.degree. F.
As above indicated, it is ordinarily very much preferred to include
in the resin a small amount of an appropriate blowing agent
effective to produce a very large number of minute cells or voids
throughout the body of the finished article. Depending upon the
particular blowing agent employed, as discussed more in detail
below, it may be desirable to heat the material while enclosed
within the mold and prior to setting of the resin to activate such
agent. The mold will ordinarily have been removed from the
turntable at this stage since it is usually not desired to
centrifuge the same during performance of the blowing operation.
Such minute cells or voids in the outer abrasive region of the tool
assist in permitting micro-deformation at locally overstressed
points of the working face in use, such response to high unit
pressures being at least somewhat due to partial collapse of free
volume therein. Furthermore, the interstices between the abrasive
grains are relatively open so that the grains exposed at the
working face of the tool instead of being substantially solidly
embedded in individual sockets have their cutting edges much more
fully exposed for active work than has been the case in prior
practice. When polyurethane is employed as the bonding agent, such
preferred resin evidences an unexpectedly strong bond to the
abrasive grains effective to secure the latter even under severe
working conditions and despite the fact that the bonding resin may
contact only certain portions of the individual abrasive grains
rather than substantially completely solidly embedding the latter.
Excessive wear and damage to the abrading tool are likewise
somewhat minimized by the inner resin or plastic central portion of
the tool which serves to support the relatively more rigid outer
abrasive portion (which itself is capable of local
micro-deflection) in a manner to absorb violent shock and stresses
which may be encountered when the latter engages the work. In some
cases, however, it is preferred to remove the inner non-abrasive
portion of the wheel and quite frequently at least the extreme
inner portion may thus be removed to adapt the wheel to various
sizes of arbors or the like.
As shown in FIGS. 5 and 6, a rotary abrading wheel produced in
accordance with the invention may ordinarily be of the usual
cylindrical form and provided with a central arbor hole 17 formed
by stud 7 within the mold or drilled to a larger diameter as may be
desired. Various metal hubs and the like may be placed within the
mold and thereby included as a part of the finished article. As
shown in FIGS. 5 and 6, the wheel will comprise a radially outer
circumferential portion 18 ordinarily of substantial width having a
large number of abrasive grains 19 slightly spaced apart out of
contact with each other by the cellular resin, and an inner
non-abrasive portion 20 of the resin body having a multitude of
small cells therein. For purposes of clarity, such cells in both
the radially inner and outer portions of the wheel are not shown in
these figures, but their relative size and disposition are
indicated in certain other figures of the drawing. The side or end
faces 21 and 22 of the wheel will ordinarily have an integral
substantially imperforate resin skin formed thereon in the molding
operation, and this skin adds appreciably to the strength of the
wheel. If desired, however, thin annular face plates of sheet
metal, strong paper, cardboard or plastic may be molded and bonded
to the respective end faces of the wheel.
Instead of separately introducing into the mold the binder resin
and the discrete abrasive elements, these components may themselves
be intermixed in advance so as to be simultaneously supplied to the
mold in the same manner as above described. While it is desirable
that the abrasive granules be easily wetted by the liquid resin
composition and that the components be well and uniformly
intermixed to the extent feasible, the uniform disposition of the
abrasive grains in the final product is not dependent thereon but
is obtained by means of the centrifuging and foaming steps above
described. The amount of resin-abrasive mixture delivered to the
mold, while only partially filling the same, will ordinarily be
selected to be sufficient completely to fill the mold upon
expansion of the resin-abrasive body as a result of the blowing
operation. The blowing operation takes place at atmospheric
pressure (the mold being centrally vented), and a small amount of
flash may be produced which can easily be trimmed from the finished
article. In some cases, when an especially strong blowing action is
obtained, centrifuging may be continued, although usually at
reduced speed, during the blowing operation in order to obtain the
desired uniform spacing of the individual grains while at the same
time limiting such spacing to not more than approximately one grain
diameter. It will be seen that there are accordingly a number of
factors which may be utilized in regulating the manufacture of the
new abrasive tool including the speed of centrifuging, the
viscosity of the resin binder and the activity of the blowing
agent, for example.
Now referring more particularly to FIGS. 7, 8 and 9 of the drawing,
FIG. 7 illustrates in much magnified, somewhat diagrammatic form
the placement of the abrasive grains 19 in the outer
circumferential portion of the mold as a result of the centrifuging
operation, such grains being concentrated into subtantially
contacting relationship with the interstices therebetween filled
with the binder resin 23, although as above indicated some degree
of foaming may already be taking place. Upon further foaming of the
binder resin, ordinarily after cessation of effective centrifuging
and after such resin has substantially increased in viscosity, the
abrasive grains 19 are moved apart thereby as generally indicated
in FIG. 8, the individual grains being uniformly spaced apart
preferably not more than about one grain diameter, on the average.
The resin is then set in this condition and, while forming a rather
complex structure as viewed under the microscope, may nevertheless
properly be described as comprising relatively thin coatings on the
grain surfaces bonded to and holding the latter and interconnected
by heavy web portions 24 having cells or voids therebetween, and
sometimes also apparently smaller bubbles or cells formed within
such web portions themselves. Such webs are of considerably greater
dimensional thickness than webs which are produced when the same
resin is caused to foam freely under atmospheric pressure without
employment of the centrifuging step. Such heavy webs are of
considerable advantage in the finished article since they play a
large part in limiting the stubborn local deformation of the resin
body to the required micro amounts needed to permit readjustment of
an individual protruding grain and absorb the excess energy of the
force imposed thereon when such protruding grain is brought into
engagement with the work surface under grinding pressure.
Using either of the centrifuging methods above described, a uniform
circumferential region of densely concentrated abrasive material is
soon produced which may be observed through a transparent cover
plate, and as the blowing operation proceeds this annular
circumferential abrasive region may be seen to widen appreciably in
a radially inward direction due to radially inward displacement of
the abrasive granules resulting from the formation of gas pockets
or cells therebetween. The width of such region or band of abrasive
concentration may in some cases even be doubled due to such action
of the blowing compound although in many cases the effect will be
very considerably less. Of course, the radially inner non-abrasive
portion 20 of the resin or plastic body will likewise
simultaneously expand radially inwardly due both to such expansion
of the outer circumferential abrasive bearing portion and also the
formation of cells or bubbles 25 within the portion 20 itself. As
indicated in FIG. 9, such cells or bubbles 25 are normally both
smaller and have thinner webs separating the same than is the case
with the cells which assist in spacing the abrasive grains 19 (FIG.
8). It will be noted from the foregoing that centrifugal force is
employed initially to distribute the abrasive grains in an annular
region in uniform (substantially contacting) relation to each other
with liquid resin in the interstices therebetween, the excess resin
being separated from the grains in a radially inward direction by
direct displacement. The resin is not set, however, until after the
grains have been moved slightly out of contact with each other by
means of the foaming operation. When the entire mass is expanded by
means of the blowing operation, it is interesting and important to
note that no differential effect or result is obtained in the
abrasive annulus. In other words, a radial cross-section through
such abrasive annulus shows the abrasive grains to be uniformly
distributed and spaced not only circumferentially of the tool but
also radially of such abrasive annular portion, the consequence
being that the grinding characteristics of the tool in use are not
appreciably altered as the diameter of the tool is reduced through
repeated dressings. It is desirable that the resin be at least
preliminarily gelled or set as promptly as possible after the
abrasive grains have thus been properly uniformly slightly spaced,
such prompt gelation cooperating with the cells in the resin body
to prevent settling of the abrasive content under influence of
gravity following cessation of centrifuging. The grinding tool
produced in this manner will have a maximum number of cutting
points exposed at the working face of the tool consistent with the
requirements that the abrasive grains be slightly uniformly spaced
for individual micro-adjustment and absorption of stress. Such
uniform spacing of the grains is obtained in accordance with the
invention inasmuch as the foaming may continue at atmospheric
pressure until the resin gels sufficiently to inhibit and finally
stop the foaming. At this point, the forces producing the foaming
and the forces resisting the foaming, i.e., the gelation or
increased viscosity of the resin and, optionally, continued
rotation of the centrifuge, will be in balance and further foaming
will cease.
One of the most difficult problems encountered in the manufacture
of conventional grinding wheels is the obtaining of uniformity from
wheel to wheel within specific grades, such wheels being
manufactured with dry granular materials and the compacting of such
a mass into a particular shape and size being hard to reproduce.
Because of the unique manufacturing methods above described and the
materials employed, exceptional uniformity of wheel quality is an
inherent feature of the present invention, and consequently less
frequent adjustment is required to maintain close tolerances in
production operations.
ABRASIVE MATERIAL
The type, grit size and amount of abrasive may be varied to produce
a wide variety of useful products. All commonly available abrasive
grains are adapted to be employed in the articles and manufacturing
methods of this invention. In each particular case, however, it is
necessary to take into consideration the size, shape, purity and
other aspects of the materials employed to ensure obtaining the
desired dense concentration of the abrasive grains in the working
portion of the abrading tool, the exact amount of the abrasive
grain to be employed being directly determined by the bulk density
(grams/unit volume obtained by free fall) for the specific grade,
size, shape, etc., of abrasive being employed. The term "bulk" or
"pack" density of abrasive grains is well known and understood in
the art, and figures are available for all of the common abrasive
grains. The term is defined by The Grinding Institute as weight in
air of a given volume of the permeable material (including both
permeable and impermeable voids normal to the material) expressed
in grams per cubic centimeter. For the purposes of the present
invention, I very much prefer that grinding tools in accordance
therewith have an abrasive content of a density equal to from about
75 percent to about 100 percent of the bulk or pack density of the
particular abrasive employed. The abrasive grains should constitute
from about 30 percent to about 45 percent of the abrasive-resin
body, by volume, with the resin correspondingly normally
constituting from abut 45 percent to about 30 percent of the tool
body by volume.
Any suitable abrasive material may be utilized such as silicon
carbide, aluminum oxide, emery, garnet, talc, pumice, and lime
silicon dioxide, depending upon the abrading action and the
resultant surface finish desired. While grit sizes of from 600 to
10 mesh may be utilized, the ordinary range will be from about 320
to about 24 mesh and most frequently from 60 to 36 mesh.
Such abrasive grains should have reasonably close size control so
that they will not centrifuge differentially through the liquid
media (i.e., the finer grains predominately towards the center of
the wheel and the coarse grains toward the outer periphery of the
wheel). For example, it may be possible to centrifuge a blend of
46, 54 and 60 grit fairly uniformly but not a blend of 36 and 100
grit. Likewise, if two different types of abrasives are employed as
a blend, the true densities of each must be carefully considered so
that the mass of the particle remains approximately the same. Thus,
boron carbide having a specific gravity of 2.51 will centrifuge
quite differently from aluminum oxide with a specific gravity of
3.95 even though they might both be classified as 60 grit.
The wetting ability and purity of the grain is important. The
wetting properties of the abrasive material determine the speed of
blending the grain with the reactive resin mixture. Acid or basic
impurities on the surface of the abrasive may tend to catalyze the
resin reaction. Moreover, the abrasive grain must have friability,
shape, and hardness properties which are compatible with the
bond-filler media in which it is embedded.
FILLER MATERIAL
A filler such as mica (325 mesh), graphite powder (325 mesh), iron
pyrites (approximately 200 mesh), silicon carbide and aluminum
oxide of flour fineness, etc., may be incorporated in the
resin-abrasive mix. Such filler should be so finely ground that it
may be uniformly dispersed throughout the grinding wheel even when
present in small quantities and should be of such specific gravity
and fineness that it will essentially not centrifuge to the outer
portion of the wheel through the media of the reacting resin foam
mix and abrasive slurry at the centrifuge speeds involved. That is,
there should be no great difference in filler concentration in
relation to the foam resin at the hub and at the outer periphery of
the new abrasive wheel.
The filler may desirably in certain cases help remove some of the
heat of reaction by absorbing heat from the reacting mass and such
filler will ordinarily assist in reducing stresses within the
grinding wheel which may be present in an unfilled plastic system.
The cellular structure of the cured system helps to alleviate this
problem but at areas of differential coefficient of linear
expansion, such as at the interface of the abrasive annulus-plastic
hub portion of the grinding wheel, a filler may be useful to reduce
stresses which might lead to cracking of the wheel. The filler then
adds to the desirable grinding qualities of the wheel, and fillers
such as graphite or mica may impart lubricating qualities to the
wheels. One such as sulfur, iron pyrite, or cryolite may impart
cooling qualities during grinding because they decompose or boil at
or below normal grinding temperatures. Fillers such as fine silicon
carbide or aluminum oxide flour may also impart additional abrasive
action to the wheel and may be desirable for fine finish work.
MATRIX OR BINDING MATERIAL
A satisfactory polyurethane composition for producing a
substantially rigid, dimensionally stable, infusible, cellular
foamed body such as characterizes the improved grinding wheel of
the present invention which will make a precise grinding cut at
substantial high pressure may be made by using a polyester in which
one of the components, usually the hydroxyl bearing group is
trifunctional or higher. The polyester, with free hydroxyl groups
present, can be subsequently cross-linked with a diisocyanate to
form the finished polyurethane. Some examples of desirable
polyester compositions are the following formulations.
______________________________________ Formula No. 1 Formula No. 2
moles moles glycerol 4.0 trimethylol propane 4.0 adipic acid 2.5
adipic acid 2.5 phthalic anhydride 0.5 phthalic anhydride 0.5
Formula No. 3 Formula No. 4 moles moles glycerol 2.0 trimethylol
propane 3.0 pentaerythritol 0.5 phthalic anhydride 2.0 phthalic
anhydride 1.0 sebacic acid 3.0 Formula No. 5 moles trimethylol
propane 4 adipic acid 1 phthalic anhydride 1/2 dimer acids 1/2
______________________________________
Wheels may thus be produced with the above formulations which
comprise a substantially rigid, dimensionally stable, non-brittle,
infusible, cellular foamed body made by reacting a material
selected from the group or class consisting of aromatic polyesters
and polyethers with a polyisocyanate to produce such rigid
polyurethane. The reaction products may be termed resins selected
from the group consisting of aromatic polyester polyurethanes and
aromatic polyether polyurethanes.
A formulation such as that below may also be employed utilizing
aliphatic polyesters and polyethers in the reaction with the
polyisocyanate also to produce a cross-linked rigid thermosetting
type foam:
Formula No. 6 ______________________________________ trimethylol
propane 3-9/16 moles dimer acids 1/16 mole oxalic acid 21/2 moles
______________________________________
Cross-linking can be obtained in a polyurethane system if one of
the components of the polyester, usually the hydroxyl bearing group
is trifunctional or higher. The polyester with free hydroxyl groups
present can be subsequently cross-linked with a diisocyanate to
form the finished polyurethane. Also, such cross-linking in a
polyurethane system can be obtained if the system is a polyether,
the polyether, however, being in the form of a triol or higher to
cross-link with the diisocyanate; the shorter the distance between
the cross-linking hydroxyl positions, the more rigid the structure
obtained. Also, such cross-linking can be obtained if a linear
polyester based on glycols or a polyether system containing diols
is cross-linked by using a triisocyanate (i.e., triphenylmethane
triisocyanate). However, in commercial practice, the first two
methods of cross-linking a polyurethane system are desirably
employed to obtain such rigid foams.
Polyesters such as the above used in polyurethane formulations
should have an acid number of from less than one to forty and have
the following ratio range of the hydroxyl to the carboxyl groups in
the resin reactants: From four hydroxyl (OH) to one carboxyl
(COOH); to one hydroxyl (OH) to one carboxyl (COOH). The preferred
ratios are from three hydroxyl (OH) to one carboxyl (COOH); to
1-1/2 hydroxy (OH) to one carboxyl. The excess of hydroxyl groups
ensure the subsequent reaction with polyisocyanate to form
polyurethanes.
The dimer acids or dimerized fatty acids included in certain of the
above examples of alkyd resins are dimeric polymers of unsaturated
fatty acids such as: dimerized linolenic or linoleic acids. These
dimer acids may be prepared by heating the methyl esters of
polyunsaturated acids such as linoleic or linolenic acids at high
temperatures. This is represented diagrammatically by a Diels-Alder
reaction to form the dilinoleic acid (dibasic unsaturated acid) as
follows: ##SPC1##
A suitable one-shot polyurethane may be made by blending one of the
above polyesters with the theoretical amount of slight excess of
polyisocyanate, preferably toluene diisocyanate (either 2,4 or 2,6
toluene diisocynate or mixtures thereof), to react with the excess
hydroxyl groups present in the polyester. A possible reaction is
shown in FIG. No. 1, using toluene diisocyanate and a polyester as
indicated in formula 1.
The polyisocyanate employed in preparing the reactant foaming
compositions may be used either with or without one or more
thermoplastic polymeric resin additives, the latter serving to
stabilize the foam during the reaction. Ethyl cellulose has been a
particularly effective additive in this respect and the preferred
range of addition would be from 0 to 8 parts of ethyl cellulose per
100 parts of toluene diisocyanate, by weight.
Heat resistance of the above formulations may be improved by adding
polymethylol phenyls in the reactant compositions or mixtures for
producing cellular plastics.
The preferred method of producing foam in the above systems is to
incorporate from 01. percent to 3.0 percent H.sub.2 O by weight
into the alkyd resin. The water may be incorporated as liquid
water; however, other means may be employed, such as one or more
metallic salt hydrates. Wetting agents such as glycerol
monoricinoleate may also be incorporated to aid in the uniform
dispersion of the water into the alkyd resin. The reaction between
the polyisocyanate and water forms an intermediate product,
carbamic acid, which decomposes to give a primary amine and carbon
dioxide gas, the blowing agent.
A typical system would be a polyester of the type indicated in
formula 1, with a hydroxyl number of 450 - 470, a water content of
0.1 to 1.0 percent and a viscosity of 120,000 to 160,000 CPS at
70.degree. F. The polyester may have additives such as 2, 4, 6
trimethylol allyloxy benzene included to improve heat resistance.
This composes one component of the one-shot system. The other
component is composed of a diisocyanate, preferably toluene
diisocyanate (either 2,4 or 2,6 toluene diisocyanate or
combinations thereof) which can be blended with from 0 to 8 parts
by weight of ethyl cellulose per 100 parts toluene diisocyanate. In
machine mixing, the polyester, or resin component is normally
heated to a suitable temperature, from 100.degree. to 150.degree.
F., so that the resin can be pumped and dispensed more readily. The
toluene diisocyanate component may have an initial viscosity of
from 1 to 5,000 CPS at 70.degree. F. depending upon the amount and
type of ethyl cellulose present. A filler such as mica above noted
then may be incorporated.
The ingredients may usually be mixed at room temperature although
they may, if desired, be preheated to reduce viscosity and increase
the rate of reaction. They may be mixed for about 1 minute and then
poured into the spinning mold, the latter operation requiring about
30 seconds and the centrifuging about 45 to 240 seconds. The
duration of centrifuging at speed depends upon several factors.
Such centrifuging must be sufficiently long and the speed
sufficiently high to cause the abrasive grains to be uniformly
concentrated in the outer periphery of the wheel. The duration of
centrifuging must also be sufficiently long to allow polymer and
viscosity build-up so that the abrasive annulus will not slump
seriously due to gravity when effective centrifuging ceases.
However, the centrifuging should be stopped while foaming action is
still sufficient to separate the abrasive grains and to cause the
reacting, foaming resin to travel radially inwardly and complete
the dimensions of the mold. The speed of centrifuging may vary from
several hundred r.p.m. to several thousand r.p.m. depending
primarily upon the diameter of the wheel produced. The turntable or
spinning mold may then be stopped and the foaming operation
proceeds for aproximately 10 minutes to fill the central portion of
the mold and to widen the outer circumferential abrasive region
radially inwardly through uniform spreading of the abrasive
elements slightly apart. Another 10 minutes may be required for
initial setting, and then 20 minutes or more for final setting.
Foam may, of course, be generated in known manner in various types
of resins by whipping or beating, or by inclusion of soluble
granules which are subsequently dissolved out, or by introduction
of gases under pressure. The term "foam" as herein employed is
intended to include cellular structures without regard to the
particular manner in which such cells may be formed.
To manufacture a preferred abrading wheel, 162 grams of an alkyd
resin, such as given in formula 1, is mixed with 138 grams of
toluene -2,4 diisocyanate for 1 minute. An abrasive material such
as 330 grams of 36 grit fused aluminum oxide may be mixed into the
above alkyd-diisocyanate mixture. The foregoing mixture is
immediately placed into the aforedescribed mold and then rotated at
about 3,000 r.p.m. for 1 minute. The mold is then placed into an
oven at approximately 250.degree. F. for 2 hours. The mold may then
be removed from the oven and cooled before the finished, foamed
abrading wheel is removed. The finished wheel should weigh 520
grams. The difference in the original weight of materials and the
article weight is accounted for by the cling in the mixing cup. The
cling material and the material in the mold each contain the same
proportion of grit and plastic as the mix.
Satisfactory wheels may also be made by varying the foregoing
procedure; for example, the abrasive material may be premixed into
the alkyd resin or diisocyanate portion of the mixture. The alkyd
resin may be varied as to the nature of its chemical components as
given, for example, in formulas 2, 3, 4 and 6. Abrasive type and
grit size may also be varied to produce the desired type of
abrading action in the finished wheel. The toluene diisocyanate
portion of the foregoing mixture may be varied by using mixtures of
toluene -2,4 diisocyanate with toluene -2,6 diisocyanate.
Another formulation for making, for example, 7 inches O.D. by 1/2
inch wheels using a resin sold by Nopco Chemical Company under the
trade name "Lockfoam" would be as follows:
162 grams A-625-R "Lockfoam" resin manufactured by
The Nopco Chemical Company
138 grams A-625-C foaming agent also manufactured
by The Nopco Chemical Company
330 grams Abrasive grit as the aforementioned
aluminum oxide, for example
The foregoing material may be mixed in the order given above, at a
temperature of 70.degree. F. to start. The resin and foaming agent
may be mixed for 45 seconds and then the abrasive grit is added and
mixed for an additional 45 seconds. This mixture may then be placed
in a mold having a volume larger than that of the mixture, such
mold being made so that it is open to the atmospheric pressure. The
mold is then rotated to centrifuge the contents for 45 seconds at
about 2,800 r.p.m. While still in the mold, the article is cured at
about 200.degree. F. for 1-3/4 hours, after which it is cooled to
room temperature before the mold is opened. The weight of the final
wheel is 520 grams.
WHEEL COMPOSITION AND DENSITY
The composition of the abrasive annulus 13 can be obtained by
burn-out tests utilizing certain procedures to obtain the
composition breakdown. The density and volume of the grinding wheel
can be accurately determined by means of ASTM Test D792-50
(Specific gravity by water displacement) if the grinding wheel is
essentially closed cell and does not absorb water rapidly, this
latter feature being important in grinding wheels which are often
run with coolants. If fluids are absorbed by the wheel, the latter
may tend to become out of balance. In such tests, sections of
wheels of known weight and volume are placed in a crucible and
fired for at least 1 hour in an oven maintained at 1,300.degree. F.
During this period, all organic bond material is driven off as
volatile matter. Also, if a filler is present which either boils or
decomposes below the oven temperature, it will be driven off with
the bond material. If not, the filler will remain in the crucible
with the abrasive which is unchanged at this temperature. Examples
of fillers that are not affected at this temperature are mica and
graphite. Since these are present as very fine particles, they can
be separated from the heavier or larger abrasive particles by
washing in a manner similar to that employed in ore separating
processes. An example of a filler which is volatilized in the oven
at such temperature is sulfur which boils at 832.degree. F. This
must be subsequently separated from the bond by chemical analysis,
using a fresh sample from the same grinding wheel. By weighing the
remaining contents after burn-out, with an analytical balance and
also after wash-out and drying, a very accurate determination of
composition by weight can be made with excellent duplication.
However, weight composition does not reveal the complete story of
the grinding wheel. Volume composition, which includes air or gas
space, sometimes referred to as porosity in the grinding industry,
is a very significant factor. To obtain volumetric composition, the
densities of the abrasive, bond and filler can be ascertained. As
an example:
Aluminum oxide abrasive density 3.95 gm/cc. Polyurethane bond
density 1.20 gm/cc. Mica density 2.84 gm/cc.
The aluminum oxide abrasive density can vary from 3.90 to 3.97
gm/cc., depending on friability, but 3.95 gm/cc. is a good over-all
average. The 1.20 gm/cc. density for the non-foamed polyurethane
bond system can be obtained from suppliers of the resins. This
density may, however, vary somewhat for other rigid polyurethanes
employed, but such variance is not particularly significant. Since
the total volume and the volume occupied by the constituents of the
grinding wheel can be ascertained, the volume occupied by the air
space can be determined by the difference. The over-all density is
determined as above set forth and the abrasive density can be
determined as simply the over-all density times the weight percent
of abrasive. By using the volumetric composition, different
abrasives such as silicon carbide or diamond; or different bonds,
such as epoxy and phenolic; or different fillers, such as sulfur or
cryolite, find utility in the wheel of the present invention. The
weight make-up may change quite considerably with such different
components, but the volumetric make-up will remain approximately
the same. The weight make-up is important when related to a
specific system; i.e., aluminum oxide, polyurethane bond, mica
filler; and is also included to help define the product of the
present invention.
The following examples 1-5 indicate the results of this analysis:
##SPC2##
In the examples 1-5 above, the resin system used is a
polyester-based one-shot polyurethane such as that previously set
forth. The filler (325 mesh white waterground mica) was preblended
with the toluene diisocyanate component of the system so that the
foaming resin system contained filler as it was dispersed from the
mixing machine. The foam system in each case is a normal 25 pound
per cubic foot free foam density rigid polyurethane. The resin is
preheated to 130.degree. F. The toluene diisocyanate component was
thinned to obtain a toluene isocyanate with 2 parts ethyl cellulose
per 100 parts T.D.I. The filler was then preblended into the above
solution and the blend dispensed at a temperature of approximately
80.degree. F. The mix of mica-filled foam reactants was dispensed
into a cup and the abrasive added to the top and blended into a
uniform mixture by mixing with a loop-type mixer for 15 seconds.
The uniform blend was then dispensed into a steel mold of
dimensions 7 inches O.D. .times. 11/4 inches I.D. .times. 1/2 inch
thick maintained at a temperature of 150.degree. F. The top was
placed on the mold secured with a nut and centrifuging was started
75 seconds after the foam shot was taken. The mold was rotated at
2,200 r.p.m. for 45 seconds, then allowed to coast down to rest
(about 20 seconds). The mold was then removed from the centrifuge
and placed into an oven for three hours at 200.degree. F. The
wheels, as indicated, were subjected to burn-out tests by splitting
the abrasive annulus on the parting line 26 in FIg. 5 and then
running the burn-out tests separately on each portion.
The above fixe examples are indicative of the compositions obtained
in a seven inch diameter grinding wheel. Larger wheels must
generally be made by more rapid means because much larger amounts
of material must be handled in the same period of time. In example
6, set forth below, a 24 inches O.D. .times. 3/4 inch thick wheel
was employed, such wheel being made by blending abrasive with the
reactant mix in two separate cups and filling by pouring into a
rotating mold, stopping and inserting the vented core into the
filled mold before going into high speed centrifuging. The results
of burn-out tests at various positions in the abrasive indicate
some differences in composition as the radial distance from the
outer edge changes. However, it is to be noted that at identical
radial distances (such as work encounters when acted upon by the
grinding wheel since the grinding wheel is rotated on the same axis
as that on which it was initially produced), the wheel has
excellent uniformity.
Example 6
__________________________________________________________________________
(24" O.D. .times. 3/4" thick)
__________________________________________________________________________
Radial distance from outer edge 0.375 1.13 1.75 2.25 3.13 (in.)
Over-all density 2.48 2.45 2.37 2.30 2.23 (gm/cc) Abrasive density
1.83 1.81 1.74 1.68 1.61 (gm/cc)
__________________________________________________________________________
Abrasive 73.8 74.0 73.3 72.8 72.1 Composition Filler (325 3.5 3.0
3.0 3.0 3.0 mesh mica) Weight % Bond-rigid 22.7 23.0 23.7 24.2 24.8
polyurethane
__________________________________________________________________________
Abrasive 46.9 46.4 44.6 43.0 41.3 Composition Filler (325 3.0 2.6
2.5 2.4 2.4 mesh mica) Volume Bond-rigid 47.0 46.9 46.8 46.4 46.2
polyurethane Air 3.1 4.1 6.1 8.2 10.1
__________________________________________________________________________
In the above example, 1,916 grams of the rigid polyurethane
reactants were mixed with 259 grams of 325 mesh mica and with 3,325
grams of the abrasive and were agitated with a loop-type mixing
blade until the materials were well blended (approximately 15
seconds). The ingredients were then poured into a mold rotating at
approximately 550 r.p.m. In approximately 75 seconds from the start
of the first shot of the foam before the ingredients had been
poured into the mold, the centrifuging was stopped and the mold
plug secured. Even with the plug in place, there is adequate
central venting of the mold, however. The centrifuge was then spun
at 800 r.p.m. for approximately 90 seconds. The mold was then
removed from the centrifuge and cured in an oven for 5 hours at
200.degree. F.
In example 7 set forth below, a 20 inches O.D. .times. 2 inches
thick wheel was produced by mixing all ingredients in the mold. A
specially designed core containing mixing blades may be located
below the abrasive and foam feeding stations to blend the mixture
with no external hand mixing and acts as the center vented core
after the mix is achieved. The compositions at different radial
positions roughly coincide with example 6 as indicated:
Example 7 ______________________________________ (20" O.D. .times.
2" thick) ______________________________________ Radial distance
from 0.375 1.13 1.75 outer edge (in.) Over-all density (gm/cc) 2.51
2.49 2.41 Abrasive density (gm/cc) 1.87 1.86 1.78
______________________________________ Abrasive 74.4 74.5 74.3
Composition Filler (325 3.2 3.3 2.9 mesh mica) Weight % Bond (rigid
22.4 22.2 22.8 polyurethane) ______________________________________
Abrasive 47.9 47.6 45.7 Composition Filler (325 2.8 2.9 2.4 mesh
mica) Volume Bond (rigid 47.2 46.1 45.6 polyurethane) Air 2.1 3.4
6.3 ______________________________________
In the above example, 6,147 grams of the rigid polyurethane
reactants were mixed with 829 grams of 325 mesh white waterground
mica along with 10,708 grams of 60 grit size abrasive and dispensed
into a mold rotating at 700 r.p.m. The mixing was accomplished by
four blades rotating at the same speed as the mold plus an air
nozzle to keep the material from building up on the sides of the
mixing chamber. The mold was then stopped, cored and then rotated
at 1,060 r.p.m. for 120 seconds. The wheel was then cured for seven
hours at 200.degree. F. with the final weight of the wheel being
17,450 grams.
Another excellent polyurethane system can be obtained using
polyether as a base. Examples of usable polyethers include reactive
polyglycols. The preferred type of polyether is one which is
trifunctional or higher (i.e., triols, pentols, hexols). A good
system for use with grinding wheels of the present invention is
called a quasi-system and is shown as follows as weight
percent.
______________________________________ Part A Part B
______________________________________ polyether 20% polyether
99.3% toluene diisocyanate 78% water 0.1% catalyst 0.2% catalyst
0.6% emulsifier 1.8% ______________________________________
Parts A and B can be blended in a mixing machine in the ratio of 4
parts A to 3 parts B.
For the preferred grinding wheel of the present invention which
will make a very precise cut at predetermined high pressure, it is
important to select a rigid, infusible, dimensionally stable,
cross-link resin for the foam. Cross-linking of this type can be
obtained in a polyurethane system if:
1. One of the components of the polyester, usually the hydroxyl
bearing group, is trifunctional or higher. The polyester, with free
hydroxyl groups present, can be subsequently cross-linked with a
diisocyanate to form the finished polyurethane.
2. If the system is a polyether, the polyether must be in the form
of a triol or higher to cross-link with a diisocyanate. The shorter
the distance between the cross-linking hydroxyl positions, the more
rigid the structure.
3. A linear polyester based on glycols or a polyether system
containing diols could possibly be cross-linked by using a
triisocyanate (i.e., triphenylmethane triisocyanate) but in
commercial practice systems 1 and 2 are usually used to obtain
rigid foams.
As previously stated, other resins than the polyurethanes mentioned
are suitable for use with the grinding wheels of the present
invention. One example thereof is an epoxy resin mixture which will
produce a foam system, such as the following:
Amount Purpose (grams) Ingredient
______________________________________ Resin 147.7 EPON 828 - epoxy
resin (Shell Chemical) Resin 31.3 EPON 1004 - epoxy resin (Shell
Chemical) Filler 26.0 Mica - 325 mesh white waterground Diluent -
heat absorber 6.0 Toluene - technical grade Curing agent 11.0
Diethylene triamine Wetting agent 4 drops Tween 20 - polyoxethylene
(20) sorbitan monolaurate Blowing agent 0.5 Ammonium carbonate -
powdered, purified Abrasive 334.0 Aluminum oxide - 60 grit
______________________________________
PROCEDURE
1. Preblend 147.7 grams EPON 828, 31.3 grams EPON 1004, 26 grams
mica, 4 drops Tween 20 and 6 grams xylene and heat to 170.degree.
F.
2. Add 11 grams diethylene triamine and blend with a high speed
loop-type mixer for 10 seconds.
3. Add 334 grams aluminum oxide, 60 grit, at 170.degree. F. and
blend for additional 10 seconds.
4. Add 0.5 grams powdered ammonium carbonate and blend additional
15 seconds until finely dispersed.
5. Add above mixture to mold of dimensions 7 inches O.D. .times.
11/4 inches I.D. .times. 0.500 inch thick (305.3 cc.), close mold
and centrifuge at 2200 r.p.m. for 60 seconds.
6. Allow mold to coast to a stop (20 seconds), then remove mold and
place in oven to cure for three hours at 200.degree. F.
7. Final Weight -- 520 grams.
EPON resin 828 has an epoxide equivalent of 175-210, molecular
weight of 350-400. EPON resin 1004 has an epoxide equivalent of
870-1,025 and a molecular weight of 1400. Other epoxy resins such
as EPON 834 (epoxide equivalent 225-290, molecular weight 450) and
EPON 1001 (epoxide equivalent 450-525, molecular weight 900-1000)
may be used. Diethylene triamine is the curing agent, but curing
agents such as metaphenylene diamine may be included to improve
strength, heat and chemical resistance of the bond. Mica is the
filler, but other fillers previously described may be employed.
Toluene is the solvent-diluent used to modify and control the
foaming process by absorbing excessive heat of reaction. Tween 20
is used as a wetting agent to provide a fine and uniform dispersion
of gas bubbles. Ammonium carbonate is the blowing agent, but
various other blowing agents can be incorporated, such as Celogen
(P, P.sup.1 oxybis (benzenesulfonyl hydrazide)), nitroso compounds,
azo compounds, hydrazides, etc. Thus, the resin-catalyst wetting
agent-blowing agent system may be varied to obtain a proper
cross-linked system for abrasive wheels.
Phenolic foams have also been found suitable for production of
grinding wheels in accordance with the present invention.
______________________________________ Part A (parts by weight)
Part B (parts by weight) ______________________________________
BRLA 2761 80 Water (as ice) 50 BRLA 2760 20 Sulfuric acid
68.degree. Baume 50 Isopropyl ether 6.6 Phosphoric acid 85% 7 Tween
No. 40 1 ______________________________________
Part A is prepared as follows: The Tween 40 is dispersed in the
isopropyl ether and then, with continuous stirring, this blend is
mixed into the blend of BRLA 2761 and BRLA 2760. Part B is prepared
by adding the sulfuric acid very slowly to ice. When this addition
is complete and well stirred, the phosphoric acid may be added and
mixed well. The ratio of components is from 8 parts of Part B, to
92 parts of Part A, to 16 parts of Part B, to 84 parts of Part
A.
BRLA 2761 and BRLA 2760 are liquid phenolic resins produced by the
Union Carbide Plastics Company. Each is composed of an incompletely
condensed resin made by the interaction of phenol and formaldehyde.
The water miscibility of BRLA 2761 is 205 percent, that is, 2.05
parts by volume of water mixed with 1 part by volume of BRLA 2761
will still form a solution. Above this point, additional water will
cause an emulsion to be formed. The water miscibility of BRLA 2760
is 195 percent. When these resins are mixed with catalyst and
blowing agent, an exothermic reaction of further condensation
causes liberation of the gas by the blowing agent. The increasing
viscosity of the mix prevents escape of this gas and hence the mass
expands until the resin sets up. Tween 40 (polyethylene (20)
sorbitan mono palmitate) is a wetting agent which helps to provide
a fine and uniform dispersion of gas bubbles.
WHEEL CHARACTERISTICS
It has long been recognized that most production grinding
operations are necessarily a compromise between such essential
factors as amount of metal being removed, quality of finish, size
control and heat damage. The wheel of the present invention
substantially eliminates this element of compromise, permitting
significant increases in feed and speed of grinding without
sacrificing quality of finish or other important performance
characteristics. Because of the wheel's greater tensile and impact
strength, as compared to more conventional wheels, it can make
faster and deeper cuts and accordingly can obtain greater stock
removal per time unit while still maintaining excellent surface
finish, accuracy and cool operating characteristics. Moreover, the
wheel of the present invention can be operated at extremely high
grinding speeds. The wheel can operate at feeds and speeds beyond
anything heretofore thought possible with conventional grinding
tools. For example, while conventional wheels must be confined to
the 6,500 to 9,500 SFPM range, wheels of the present invention can
be operated at speeds as high as 13,000 SFPM (surface feet per
minute).
Production tests as well as field tests have indicated that the
wheel of the present invention has remarkably superior form holding
qualities. For example, when considering a slot cut in a solid
steel plate, the slot cut by the wheel of the present invention has
substantially square corners while a slot made by a conventional
vitrified wheel, for example, will have rounded corners. Thus, the
wheel of the present invention has remarkable corner holding
ability even under severe operating conditions.
Accordingly, the wheel of the present invention is believed to be
the safest grinding wheel ever employed. This is evidenced by its
ability to withstand higher speeds, operate with heavier cuts,
grind cooler, resist coolant saturation, and resist fracture or
breakage even under severe operating conditions. In grinding wheel
tests conducted by an independent testing laboratory, the wheel of
the present invention surpassed all standard vitrified or resinoid
grinding wheels of leading manufacturers. For example, in a
grinding face impact test involving dropping heavy metal objects
onto the faces of grinding wheels in operation, the wheel of the
present invention suffered no damage while standard vitrified or
resinoid wheels were either severely damaged or no longer usable.
In breaking speed tests, the wheel of the present invention
surpassed all standard vitrified wheels of leading manufacturers as
indicated below:
The present invention 250% Standard vitrified wheel 91% Standard
vitrified wheel 100% Standard vitrified wheel 95%
Although the grinding wheel of the present invention obtains a
faster rate of metal removal, it produces a fine surface finish of
low RMS. The wheel resists loading so well that rough and finish
cuts can often be combined, making it possible in many cases to
eliminate preceding or subsequent operations. The wheel also has
remarkably unusual stability whereby uniform finish can be held
from part to part for longer periods than with conventional types
of grinding wheels. Accurate balance and uniform quality are also
features of the wheel of the present invention. Because of the
production techniques, every wheel is produced dimensionally
accurate and in true balance. Thus, regardless of size, precision
made wheels do not require balancing at installation and set-ups
can be made on grinding machines in much less time. Moreover,
exceptional uniformity of wheel quality is an inherent feature. Due
to such uniform physical characteristics, less frequent adjustments
are required to maintain close tolerances on production operations.
Because of the unusual qualities of the wheel, it does not break
down or load as rapidly as conventional wheels. This minimizes the
number of dressings required on production runs and results in
greatly improved efficiency. For example, a conventional wheel may
require dressing approximately once every half hour whereas the
wheel of the present invention may be dressed at the start of each
shift as a precautionary measure only. Needless to say, dressing of
a wheel is a time-consuming and expensive operation.
In the aforementioned grinding edge impact test, grinding wheels
were mounted to the holding flanges and rotated at approximately
6,500 SFPM (1800 r.p.m.) while the plane of the wheel was in a
vertical direction. A chrome steel ball of 2 inches in diameter and
weighing 1.18 pounds was dropped from different heights to produce
impacts ranging from 1.18 to 10.62 foot pounds on the center of the
grinding edge or face of the wheels. Upon completion of those
impacts, the wheels were inspected for damage. Out of the eight
wheels tested, which were in accordance with the present invention,
only in two cases and at the highest impact figure did a small
crack result, all of the others showing no damage or merely a small
mark. This is in sharp contradistinction with respect to the same
test conducted on conventional vitrified, resinoid or rubber based
wheels wherein all were either damaged or no longer usable as the
result of such impact loads.
Thus, despite the above-described cellular construction of the new
grinding wheel, by employment of properly oriented abrasive grain,
of appropriate resinous ingredients, and of thermosetting plastics
and particularly polyesters of the type described reacted with
isocyanates or diisocyanates to produce substantially rigid,
dimensionally stable, infusible cross-linked polyurethane, a
grinding wheel is obtained having an extraordinarily strong rigid
work-engaging cutting face considered as a whole, whereby precision
grinding operations can be performed at much accelerated rate.
Remarkably enough, despite the high cutting rate which may
accordingly be obtained, the tool is not nearly so subject to wear
as conventional grinding wheels, particularly at the edges or
shoulders and need not be dressed so frequently to maintain a
precision cutting face. At the same time, scoring of the work does
not occur despite the exceptional depth of cut that may be taken
and a much improved surface finish is produced on the work.
It will readily be recognized that this combination of properties
would appear to be incompatible since a high rate of tool feed and
an exceptional depth of cut obviously impose severe working
stresses on the tool, and individual upstanding abrasive grains at
the tool face would normally either be broken out of the face or
would produce corresponding deep score marks in the work
surface.
The difference between a conventional grinding wheel and the
present grinding wheel lies largely in the fact that the new
structure is capable of handling a substantially higher stress
load, as can be calculated from the higher bursting speed,
especially under conditions where shock loading is expected. The
specific physical difference is that the abrasive grains are not
touching and do, in fact, find support in a substantially rigid but
non-brittle plastic matrix. This kind of matrix, especially
selected from plastics in the thermosetting category, is able to
provide individual micro-movement of the individual grains, which
action is the stress relieving or stress absorbing means. This
stress absorbing deformation occurs on a local basis without
involving change in dimension of the whole body and without
permanent relocation of the individual abrasive grains. The
physical effect is to prevent the concentration of stress from
occurring as long as possible and to keep a crack from starting and
propagating.
This feature is partially illustrated in very diagrammatic fashion
in FIGS. 10 and 11 of the drawing, the former indicating a grinding
tool profile in which the exposed abrasive grains are embedded and
accordingly protrude to varying degrees at the working face. When
such tool is caused to make a grinding cut in the work as shown in
FIG. 11, however, the impact shock is absorbed and the excessively
protruding grains are locally individually readjusted in position
so that the working pressure is supported across the entire working
face of the tool, this being accomplished without substantial
yielding of the tool body as a whole. Such stress absorbing
deformation occurs on a local basis only without involving a change
in dimension of the whole body and without permanent relocation of
the individual abrasive grains. The physical effect is to prevent a
concentration of stress from occurring as long as possible and to
keep a crack from starting and propagating. This has never before
been accomplished in a tool of this type which is dimensionally
stable and has a high abrasive grain density or concentration with
a grain weight per cubic centimeter of about 1.8 grams depending
upon the exact chemical content and grain size and shape within the
specific wheel.
It will accordingly be seen that in such rigid resin grinding
wheel, brittleness is avoided through the mechanism of absorbing
the load applied to any single abrasive grain by distributing it
over its relatively large local area of the holding matrix,
stubborn deformation of which can absorb energy without passing
such load along to adjacent grains. On the contrary, loads applied
to relatively large areas of the wheel face will not change the
dimensional stability of the face and, of course, the tool as a
whole in any amount different from that of conventional grinding
wheels.
Extremely light grinding can be performed even when the wheel is
pressed against the work at pressures as low as 100 lbs./sq. in.,
using a flat steel surface 1/2 inch square as the test work-piece,
and light grinding can be performed at 200 lbs./sq. in. At 1,000
lbs./sq. in., which is considered heavy pressure for conventional
wheels, the wheel of this invention performs excellently as
described, and in many cases the wheel of this invention may be
employed at working pressures of as high as 2,000 lbs./sq. in.
where conventional wheels would fail. It will be appreciated that
in these tests the entire surface of the test work-piece does not
ordinarily engage the working face of the wheel and the figures
given are computed from the area of contact actually observed.
The explanation of this unique capacity of the wheel is believed
clear and is found in the stress absorption obtained through such
stubborn micro-deformation permitted on an individual and local
basis by the combination of a substantially rigid but non-brittle
thermosetting resin bond and the concentrated yet uniformly spaced
apart abrasive grains. The working face of the tool which
constitutes abrasive grains mounted in a rigid non-brittle resin in
relatively large volumes, but in such a manner as to minimize unit
stress thereon, provides a structure which will permit such
independent, stubborn, local deformation in amounts sufficient to
absorb stress of any highly stressed grains. Such novel structure
is markedly different from conventional vitrified or resinoid
grinding wheels wherein brittle expulsion of the grains is easily
observed. Moreover, such structure is not even in the same class
with soft rubber or highly flexible plastic wheels where
deformation of large areas of the wheels is equally observable.
Such latter wheels, of course, cannot make a precise cut at high
feed or pressure and are suitable only for polishing or finishing
purposes.
When compared with the best of the currently available conventional
grinding wheels, a grinding tool of the present invention using a
dimensionally stable, only locally yielding polyurethane body, as
hereinbefore described, produces unexpected performance results.
The following is a comparison table between a superior conventional
commercially available grinding wheel and a similar wheel but made
in accordance with the invention:
Conventional Wheel Polyurethane Wheel Best Grade of This Invention
__________________________________________________________________________
Total weight 700 grams 525 grams Bursting speed 10,500-12,500
r.p.m. Over 14,500 r.p.m. Note: Top speed of test- ing machine is
14,500 r.p.m. Wheel wear rate .013" wheel break- .0085 wheel break-
on cold rolled down per .050" total down per .050" total steel feed
made at .002" feed made at .002" per pass per pass Stock removal
.037" stock removal .042" stock removal on C.R.S. depth per .050"
down depth per .050" down feed feed Surface finish using .002" down
45 microinches 35 microinches feed per pass Maximum depth feed
advance .003" .005" assuming equal wheel wear Static axial 440 inch
pounds In excess of 880 breaking load inch pounds Static axial
deflection .004" .019" under load of 10.7 pounds Maximum static
deflection before .200" In excess of .5625" wheel breakage Total
depth of cutting between .020" .030" dressings, using .005" down
feed Shape holding characteristics Shows substantial Substantially
as for a slot (for break-down originally formed a corner) after
.050" down feed Work-piece Heat build-up Little or no temperature
grind- quickly and easily temperature increase ing without
discernible coolant Ratio of amount of metal removed 1.0 1.7 for
equal wheel diameter loss
__________________________________________________________________________
In addition to the foregoing performance characteristics, the
improved wheel construction is distinguished by the feature that
its working face is fixed, even though the cutting points presented
by the individual grains are capable of stubborn temporary
micro-deflection. It thus becomes possible to use the wheel for
precision, dimensional cutting work.
One interesting phenomenon which may be observed when the unique
wheel of the present invention is formed without the abrasive
grains added is that the multitude of small or minute gas bubbles
that initially form as the result of the foaming action of the
resin material are caused to coalesce in the outer portion of the
body with a corresponding increase in size of the individual
bubbles or resultant cells while still maintaining the closed
character of the latter and uniform distribution thereof throughout
the area in question. Coincidentally, the web structure between the
bubbles is caused dimensionally to thicken in the area in question.
The resulting wheel-like article will accordingly then comprise a
central portion, in which the resultant cells remain numerous and
minute in size, and an outer peripheral or rim portion the radial
depth of which may be varied as desired, in which the resultant
cells are of increased size and the intervening web structure is
dimensionally thickened. Such peripheral or rim portion will
furthermore be of greater density than such central portion, e.g.,
the weight of the former per cubic centimeter may be two or three
times that of the latter, where foamable polyurethane is the resin
used.
TOOL FORMS
While the tool form in which the present invention will probably
find its greatest utility is that of a grinding wheel, above
described, it will be appreciated that other tool forms utilizing
the improvements of the present invention may also be employed. For
example, the resin may be extruded or molded in the form of an
abrasive containing cylindrical member or stick in which, if
desired, the abrasive may be concentrated and yet uniformly spaced
adjacent the outer periphery thereof by centrifuging about its
longitudinal axis. The tool may comprise a metal cup provided with
a co-axial stem adapted to be chucked in a drill press or the like.
A cylindrical abrading element of the general character of such
stick may be secured within the cup, or alternatively a cylindrical
abrading element having a conical tip portion may be similarly
mounted. The cylindrical abrading elements may be formed with the
abrasive concentrated and yet uniformly spaced in their working end
portions by centrifuging the molds in which they are produced.
Other tool forms such as blocks, belts, toothed or slotted wheels,
may also employ the features of the improvements of the present
invention.
Abrasive discs may likewise be produced in accordance with this
invention comprising the usual circular base plate to which the
disc is adhered by a suitable adhesive in well-known manner. Such
disc may be in the form of a truncated cone formed of foamed
polyurethane resin containing granular abrasive therewithin
preferably concentrated in the region of the flat circular working
face of the tool. A co-axial stud or stem is provided on the plate
for chucking in an appropriate rotary power tool.
it will be obvious that by employing a mold of different contour
and varying dimensional relationships of parts, not only may such
improvements of the present invention be employed for making
grinding wheels, but abrasive tools of any of the several types
currently employed. For example, wheels having special curved faces
may be employed for various applications. Also, a cup, cylinder or
cone may be employed either by centrifuging the components in a
mold of corresponding shape or by cutting sections from a portion
of a wheel-like article made as hereinbefore described.
Other modes of applying the principle of the invention may be
employed, change being made as regards the details described,
provided the features stated in any of the following claims or the
equivalent of such be employed.
* * * * *