U.S. patent number 3,839,027 [Application Number 05/166,984] was granted by the patent office on 1974-10-01 for aperture controlled electrostatic printing system and method.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Electroprint, Inc.. Invention is credited to Gerald L. Pressman.
United States Patent |
3,839,027 |
Pressman |
October 1, 1974 |
APERTURE CONTROLLED ELECTROSTATIC PRINTING SYSTEM AND METHOD
Abstract
This invention relates to an aperture controlled electrostatic
printing process and method which employs a multi-layer screen
comprising at least a conductive layer and a superimposed
insulative layer to enable the deployment of opposite electrostatic
charges on the screen relative to the insulative layer. The double
layer charges are modified in accordance with an image to produce
blocking and non blocking fields controlling the apertures in
accordance with the image to be reproduced. The conductive screen
layer is maintained at a potential usually during charging and
printing, and a propulsion field is provided for directing charged
printing particles toward the screen. The charged particles pass
through the screen where the apertures are not blocked by the
fringing fields and also pass through apertures which are partially
blocked, but in fewer numbers. This process uses a charge pattern
which modulates the flow of toner particles through the screen to a
print receiving medium, via preferably an air gap, for subsequent
fixing thereon, if necessary.
Inventors: |
Pressman; Gerald L. (San Jose,
CA) |
Assignee: |
Electroprint, Inc. (Palo Alto,
CA)
|
Family
ID: |
26862747 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/166,984 |
Filed: |
July 28, 1971 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
673499 |
Oct 6, 1967 |
3256604 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
430/53; 101/12;
101/DIG.36; 101/128.4 |
Current CPC
Class: |
G03G
15/346 (20130101); G03G 15/34 (20130101); G03G
2217/0025 (20130101); Y10S 101/36 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
G03G
15/34 (20060101); G03G 15/00 (20060101); G03g
015/22 (); G03g 005/02 () |
Field of
Search: |
;101/128.2,128.4,129,DIG.12 ;117/37LE ;355/16,3 ;96/1 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Smith; Ronald H.
Assistant Examiner: Goodrow; John L.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Caldwell; Wilfred G.
Parent Case Text
This is a division of application Ser. No. 673,499 filed Oct. 6,
1967 now U.S. Pat. No. 3,256,604.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. The method of electrostatic printing comprising the steps of
applying an electric field to a combination screen having an
electrically photosensitive apertured insulative layer and a
conductive apertured layer while exposing the insulative layer to a
light image to produce a charge separation across the insulative
layer in accordance with said image; removing the light image and
then removing the electric field; charging printing material;
projecting the printing material toward the screen from the
conductive layer side to permit the material to pass through the
screen in accordance with the image; and intercepting the printing
material which passes through the screen on a print receiving
medium.
2. The method of electrostatic printing comprising the steps of
producing a uniform double layer of charges on an insulating screen
having a conductive layer affixed thereto with the screen and
conductive layer having coinciding apertures; modifying the double
layer charge in accordance with an image to electrically unblock
selected apertures thereof while maintaining the conductive layer
at a fixed potential; directing charged printing material, charged
to a sign opposite to that of the charge adjacent to the conductive
layer, toward the conductive layer and intercepting the charged
printing material which is permitted to pass through the unblocked
apertures of said screen on print receiving material.
3. The method of electrostatic printing comprising the steps of
electrostatically charging a combination screen having at least an
apertured conductive screen layer and an apertured insulative
layer, affixed together, with a double layer of charges across the
insulative layer; modifying the double layer charge of the
so-charged insulative layer in accordance with an image to be
reproduced; projecting charged marking material toward the image
charged screen; and receiving the marking material which is
permitted to pass through the screen on paper as printed
reproductions of the image.
4. The method of electrostatic printing comprising the steps of
charging an apertured insulating screen having a corresponding
apertured conductive layer with a uniform double layer of charges;
modifying the double layer of charges in accordance with an image
to electrically unblock selected apertures thereof while
maintaining the conductive layer at a fixed potential; directing
charged printing material toward the insulative layer; and
intercepting the charged printing material, which is permitted to
pass through the screen and conductive layer, on print receiving
material.
5. The method of electrostatic printing using screen means
comprising an array of apertures, comprising the steps of:
establishing electric fringing fields effective within the
apertures of various magnetudes in accordance with an image to be
reproduced; and directing charged particles through the screen
means in accordance with the magnetudes of the fringing fields of
the apertures to a receiving medium.
6. The method of electrostatic printing comprising the steps of:
creating charge patterns on apertured composite screen means which
charge patterns establish lines of force extending into the
apertures to electrically close apertures in varying degrees from
complete closure to open to charged particle passage in accordance
with an image; and directing charged particles through the screen
means to a receiving means in accordance with the charge pattern on
the screen means.
7. The method of electrostatic printing using screen means
comprising an electrically photosensitive insulative layer and a
conductive layer having an array of coinciding apertures,
comprising the steps of: maintaining the conductive layer at a
fixed potential; establishing electric fringing fields effective
within the apertures and having magnetudes in accordance with an
image pattern; and directing charged particles through the screen
means by an applied propulsion field encompassing the screen means
in accordance with the magnetudes of the fields therein relative to
the propulsion field to a receiving medium.
Description
The insulator layer of the screen may comprise a photoconductor
which is merely charged or discharged in accordance with a light
pattern or it may comprise an insulator other than of the
photoconductive type which may be electrically charged.
Alternatively, if the selected insulator screen has a low
dielectric strength, a thin undercoating of a high dielectric
material, not necessarily photoconductive, is employed between the
photoconductive layer and the conductive layer. Similarly, a thin
overcoating of high resistivity material may be employed to provide
a charged carrier for photoconductors with poor surface
resistivity. When employing photoelectric materials that cannot be
deposited in heavy layers, the insulating layer may be comprised of
any good insulating material which will accept the sensitive
material as a thin deposit. Thus, a thin layer photosensitive
material may be coated over the screen comprised of an insulator
and conductive layer.
Other materials which may be used as the insulator layers are
photoemissive material, polyester films, epoxy, photoresists, fused
quartz, or combinations thereof. In addition, the conductor backing
itself may be deposited on the insulator, or a separate insulator
layer, not taking part directly in the electrostatic process, may
be used to support both the conductor and insulator layers.
The present invention improves over the known stencil type
inventions, such as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,061,068 to C. O.
Childress, et al, issued Mar. 16, 1963 and entitled Electrostatic
Printing System for the reason that the screen employed in this
patent must be in the form of a permanent stencil having openings
where printing is desired and through which the particles pass to
the print receiving material. However, these stencils are not
useful for producing more than one shape of image without resorting
to stencil forming processes to change the image. Such stencil
forming processes may be similar to the production of a silk-screen
image. In the present invention, the screen is instantly reuseable
and there is no physical stencil required.
The present invention differs from the McFarlane inventions
disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,220,831 to S. McFarlane issued Nov.
30, 1965 and entitled Electrostatic Printing Method and Apparatus
Using Developer Powder Projection Means and, also U.S. Pat. No.
3,220,833 to Samuel McFarlane issued Nov. 30, 1965 entitled
Electrostatic Printing Method in that the McFarlane inventions
employ electrostatic latent images which are powdered and the
powder is projected across an air gap from a photoconductive needle
tip carrier in the former patent or from a photoconductive coated
screen carrier in the latter patent. The present invention actually
electrostatically modulates the apertures of the screen, through
the provision of the double layer charge, which is modified in
accordance with the image to control the flow of charged toner
particles through the screen to the print receiving material.
In the composite screen structure of the present invention, the
conductive layer, at fixed potential performs two novel functions.
In the first place, it enables the insulative layer to be charged
oppositely, thereby developing the fringing or blocking fields
within the apertures of the screen, which fields are subsequently
modulated in accordance with the image pattern. It also enables the
maintenance of the blocking fields during projection of the charged
marking material, and the charges of the particles which do not
pass through the grid are simply dissipated due to the electrical
potential maintained at the conductive layer.
The conductor layer may also be used to establish a uniform field
between the screen and receiving material, if this is desired.
Depending on the charge level of the toner particles, the conductor
layer does not have to face the toner supply.
Thus, the invention may comprise a composite screen mounted for
endless movement and having at least an insulative and a conductive
layer with coinciding mesh. An imaging station is provided which
may enable positive or negative printing. When a photoconductor is
employed as the insulator of the screen, such a material is an
insulator in the dark and becomes conductive in the light. It can
be charged by ions or an electrode and a light image is then used
to discharge those areas to be printed. The light image is
reproduced in negative form because printing occurs where the image
light impinges on the screen and the discharge has been diminished
or reduced to zero. For positive printing, the screen may be
charged by an applied field during exposure to the light image.
Illuminated areas of the screen photoconductive layer becomes
conductive and under the influence of the applied charge field
cause a charge separation similar to the double charge previously
mentioned. After the charge separation is formed, the illumination
is removed, causing all parts of the screen photosensitive layer to
become insulative. Then, the charging field is removed and the
portions of the field which were illuminated remain charged, and
thus block the passage of the toner particles during the printing
step.
In either event, the modulated apertures of the screen, depicting
the image area, move into a propulsion field where charged toner
particles are projected toward the conductive side of the screen
and pass through the screen in accordance with the modulation to
continue across an air gap due to the propulsion field to ordinary
print receiving paper. A heat fixing station fixes the ink, where
necessary, because this process may employ powdered inks, as well
as aerosol sprays, or liquid droplets. The conductor may not face
the toner source in all embodiments.
With the foregoing in mind, it is among the objects of the
invention to provide an aperture controlled electrostatic printing
process and method which enables printing through a modulated
screen onto ordinary paper, across an air gap.
It is a further object of the invention to provide such
reproduction simulating half-tone printing with varying degrees of
gray to black printing or sequential color reproduction.
A further object of the invention is the provision of a novel
multi-layer screen susceptible to image modulation for controlling
the passage of charged toner material therethrough.
It is a further object of the invention to provide a method wherein
a double layer charging of a screen may be employed for subsequent
modulation to provide blocking fields in the apertures of areas of
the image being reproduced.
Yet another object is the provision of positive or negative
printing free of holidays and with good edge effects.
The invention will be better understood from a reading of the
following detailed description thereof when taken in conjunction
with the drawing wherein:
FIG. 1 is an arrangement to depict single charge stencil type
blocking of charged toner particles with fringe effects;
FIG. 2 is a view in section of a preferred embodiment of the screen
of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is an enlarged view of a portion of FIG. 2;
FIG. 4 depicts a computer analysis of the fringing or blocking
field in association with a single aperture or screen;
FIG. 5 depicts a computer analysis of a combined propulsion and
fringe field for a single aperture of the screen;
FIG. 6 is a schematic illustration of the processing steps for
reproducing the light image in negative form;
FIG. 7 is a schematic illustration of the processing steps for
reproducing the light image in positive form;
FIG. 8a is a view, in cross section, of a portion of a screen
showing the use of low dielectric strength photosensitive material
in conjunction with high dielectric strength insulative material
intermediate the photosensitive layer and the conductive layer;
FIG. 8b is a similar view showing the use of high resistivity
material as the charge carrier overlying photosensitive material
with poor surface resistivity;
FIG. 8c is another view employing a conductive layer, a good
insulative layer and a thin layer of photosensitive material
deposited over the insulator and within the apertures;
FIG. 9 depicts a computer analysis of the electrical fields within
an aperture which is only partially charged as it has insufficient
charge for full blocking; and
FIG. 10 is a schematic arrangement showing suitable apparatus for
carrying out the method.
In FIG. 1 there is shown an arrangement for stencil blocking
utilizing a single sign charge layer only, to show the limitations
of this approach. The substrate 15 to be printed is positioned
behind the stencil 17 which is positively charged, and the charged
ink particles or toner material 19 are similarly charged and
projected toward the substrate.
Electrostatic printing is normally achieved by the propulsion of
the charged ink particles 19 through the fixed stencil 17 by means
of an electric field. The blocked portions of the stencil 17
prevent passage of certain of the ink particles 19, thus forming
the image that is printed. This use of mechanical blocking requires
that the stencils be prepared by mechanical or photochemical means;
these are slow processes, requiring several hours for the
completion of a screen stencil.
Greater usefulness of the electrostatic printing process would be
achieved if the stencils could be substituted for and the
substitute prepared within seconds, and if the image could be
erased and the screen reused.
As is well known, the presence of a concentration of charges will
create surrounding fields such that the charges of like sign are
repelled from the charged area. It is clear that if an image is
formed of coplanar uniformly charged layers, and the sign of the
charges used to form the image is the same as the charge on the
toner particles, the toner will be repelled from the charged areas,
thus producing the blocking required to use the image as a stencil.
Since this blocking of the passage of the charged toner or
equivalent is accomplished by the field surrounding the charge
layer, these fields are called "blocking fields."
However, a one sign charge layer will not satisfy the requirements
of a blocking field since the fields of such a system extend in all
directions from the charges. Thus, toner particles will be repelled
not only from the surface of the charge layer (the desired blocking
effect) but also from the edges of the charge layer, which exist at
the image boundaries (FIG. 1). For printing to occur, particles
must pass through the uncharged areas (indicated in FIG. 1 as "AREA
TO BE PRINTED"). The lateral repulsion field existing at the edge
of the layer increases the blocking area, diffuses the edges of the
printed image, and prevents passage of ink through small gaps in
the charge layer.
The present invention overcomes the problems described above while
permitting the desired charge layer blocking in the nonprinting
areas of the image.
The screen used to carry the charges, and the disposition of
charges on the screen so as to perform the blocking action on the
toner, thus forming a printed image, is illustrated in FIG. 2. The
screen is constructed of conventional insulator material 21,
layered with a conductor 23, the holes 25, through which the ink
particles pass, extend in coincidence through both layers of the
screen.
Electrical connection is made to the conductor layer 23 of the
screen by tab 31 and lead 33 so that the potential of the backing
members can be maintained during printing and charging.
The insulator portion is charged so as to acquire a "double layer"
of charge (as indicated in FIG. 3) in which one face of the
insulator 21 contains charges of one polarity, while the other
surface contains an equal amount of charge of opposite polarity.
(The charge layer which is formed on the insulator surface, in
contact with the conductor, appears on the surface of the conductor
23, as shown in FIG. 3.) Thus, the net charge on the screen is
zero; therefore no field exists from these charges at a distance of
more than a few screen thicknesses away from the charged double
layer. The motion of toner particles which have passed through the
screen at uncharged areas is therefore not affected by the charged
areas of the screen.
Charging of the form indicated in FIG. 3, is made possible by the
presence of the conductor layer. A charge source (such as a corona
wand or radioactive strip) is used to spray ions on the surface of
the insulator; the conductor portion of the screen is maintained at
a fixed potential during this process so that any charge which
deposits on the insulator surface will attract an equal and
opposite charge to the junction between the insulator and the
conductor, thus creating the required double layer.
Blocking of ink particles in the charged areas is performed by the
fringing field which exists within the holes of the screen. The
fringing field is oriented so as to prevent charged ink particles
from passing through the hole. The field structure of such a charge
layer, as solved by computer analysis, is given in FIG. 4 is
association with one-half of an aperture. In FIG. 4, the electrical
force of field lines are depicted at 35, and the equi-potential
lines at 37, their magnitude being plotted along the ordinate axis,
through the center of the hole or aperture. Thusly, it will be
apparent that the positively charged particle(s) 19 will be
deflected to one or the other sides of the aperture and collected
and the charge disseminated by the conductor 23.
If the ink particles are positive, then the double layer charges
are arranged so that the particles approach the screen's negatively
charged side; conversely, negative particles must be directed
toward the positively charged surface. The weakest fringing field
exists along the center of the hole, and the magnitude of this
field depends on both the charge magnitude (strength of the field
inside the insulator) and the thickness-to-diameter ratio (T.sub.I
/D) for the screen to aperture. Since the fringing field increases
in strength as the insulator thickness increases, it is clear that
for effective blocking, a large ratio of T.sub.I /D, as well as
high charge level is desirable. The amount of fringing field
required to block the charged particles depends on the strength of
the field used to propel the particles from the source to the
printing substrate. If the particles had no inertia, blocking would
occur if the combination of fringing field and the propulsion field
(which act in opposition) produce a net zero field or repulsive
field at any point along the centerline of the hole. However,
particle inertia effects (which increase with particle diameter)
will carry the particle through the hole unless the combined fields
within the hole exert a net repelling force.
Prototype designs have indicated that the internal field in the
insulator should be at least 8 to 10 times the propulsion field if
the T.sub.I /D ratio is 0.25. Thus, for a screen with 0.008 inch
diameter holes, an insulator thickness of 0.002 inch, and a
propulsion field of 5,000 V/in., the screen should be charged to a
potential of 100 volts.
The field structure for a blocking effect (combined propulsion and
fringing fields) is shown in FIG. 5. FIG. 5 indicates a second
major function of the conductive layer. Particles which are
blocked, deposit on the conductor portion; if the conductor were
not present, these charged particles would soon neutralize the
charge on the screen and blocking action would cease. The
conductor, when maintained at constant potential during printing,
will shield the charge on the insulator from the effects of the
accumulated ink particle charges.
In FIG. 5 the combined effects of the propulsion and fringing
fields is plotted and field force lines 35' and equipotential lines
37', as well as, the particle paths 39 indicate how the aperture is
blocked.
To obtain printing, the charge image on the screen in one
embodiment must be negative of the desired print; i.e., printing
will occur where no charge exists. A number of techniques may be
used to create the charge image.
The preferred technique is the utilization of a photoconductive
material as the insulator layer of the screen. Such a material,
which is an insulator in the dark and becomes conductive in the
light, can be charged as described above (e.g., with a corona wand)
and a light image used to discharge those areas to be printed (FIG.
6). Thus, the light image would be reproduced in negative form. The
corona wand 41 is used to uniformly charge the composite screen 43.
Thereafter, the screen is illuminated from a light source 45 in
accordance with the image 210 as projected by lens system 211.
Next, the toner source 47 contains particles which are charged in
conventional manner and ordinary paper serves as the print
receiving medium, generally designated at 49. The propulsion field
for the particles is represented by V.sub.I and the screen 43 has
its conductive layer maintained at V.sub.2. The blocking effect of
a portion of the screen is illustrated by the particle paths 51,
some of which penetrate the screen to deposit particles on the
paper 49.
By way of example, for suitable conventional materials, the screen
may be charged by an applied field during exposure to the light
image, as in FIG. 7. The illuminated areas of the screen
photosensitive layer become conductive, and under the influence of
the applied charging field, via transparent electrode 55, acquire a
charge separation similar to that shown in FIG. 3. After the charge
separation is formed, the illumination is removed, causing all
parts of the screen photosensitive layer to become insulator. At
this point the charging field may be removed and the portions of
the screen which were illuminated would remain charged and thus
block the passage of toner particles during the printing process.
This technique produces positive reproductions of the light
image.
Effective field blocking of toner particles requires a combination
of high charge level and large insulator thickness. The range of
photosensitve materials which may be used for the insulator layer
can be extended by special screen configurations. If the desired
insulator material 101 (FIG. 8a) has a low dielectric strength
(thus limiting the amount of charge separation it can support) a
thin undercoating 103 of a high dielectric strength (but not
necessarily photoconductive) material can be used to separate the
photosensitive layer from high field regions near the edge of the
holes. The conductor 105 is affixed to the undercoating 103.
Similarly, a thin overcoating 107 (FIG. 8b) of high resistivity
material can be used to provide a charge carrier for
photoconductors with poor surface resistivity.
For photoelectric materials that cannot be deposited in the heavy
layers required for this process, the insulating layer may be
formed of any good insulating material which will accept the
sensitive material as thin deposit 109 (FIG. 8c). The entire
screen, including portions of the conductive layer, may be
coated.
It is computed that the form of the field within the hole is such
that, if a hole is only partially charged (i.e., has not developed
sufficient charge to block) the effect of the charge is to limit
the aperture of the hole (FIG. 9). Partially charged holes are
created by reduced exposure during discharge, as would occur in
gray areas of the image. Thus, gray areas reproduce with reduced
apparent aperture, forming a half-tone reproduction of a
continuous-tone source. The field lines are shown at 111 and the
equi-potential lines at 113.
In FIG. 10 the composite screen is shown at 121 supported by the
four motor-driven drums 122 through 125. This screen 121 may take
the form of any of the screens of FIG. 2, FIGS. 8a, 8b, and 8c.
An image station 130 includes a light source 131, image 132, and
lens system 133, which directs the light through transparent
electrode 134 and onto the screen 121. The transparent electrode
134 may be comprised of mylar with a conductive coating or of
conductive glass. Thus, the charging voltage E.sub.C is connected
by lead 136 to electrode 134 and extends to common lead or ground
137. The conductive layer of screen 121 is grounded by drum 123 at
fixed potential to complete the charging field and to fulfill its
two functions, previously described.
The modulated image is moved to the printing station, generally
designated at 140, where a toner supply of charged particles 141 is
maintained at a toner potential E.sub.T.
A revolving brush 143 is provided to agitate the toner material,
facilitating its movement toward screen 121 under control of
propulsion field E.sub.P, and the apertures of the screen 121
control passage thereof onto the paper 145 to be printed. The
propulsion field is provided by leads 147 and 149, the former of
which extends to a roller 150 which is in contact with a continuous
backing 151 of paper carrying belt 153. Toner is supplied in
powdered or atomized form over conduit 155 from a suitable source
(not shown).
The charged particles which pass through screen 121 are deposited
on the paper 145 in the form of a positive or negative image as
hereinfore explained and the paper passes under resistance heater
157, which fixes the image thereto, if necessary, and wedge 159
drops the printed paper into stack 161. The paper drive is taken
from motor driven drum 163 which is synchronized with conveyor
screen 121, preferably for intermittent motion to permit printing
at station 140.
A vacuum scavenger is shown as conduit 170 provided to remove the
marking particles or droplets from the conductor side of screen
140.
Propulsion field switch 148 is closed upon arrested motion of
conveyor screen 140 and paper belt 153 to cause transfer across an
air gap or in direct contact, if desired. Of course, if paper belt
153 and screen 140 are synchronized, provisions for interrupted
motion are unnecessary.
The schematic arrangement of FIG. 10 may be built using components
selected from the apparatus and control circuitry of U.S. Ser. No.
565,284 in the name of Samuel B. McFarlane, Jr. filed July 14, 1966
and entitled Method and Apparatus of Electrostatic Color
Reproduction, assigned to the same assignee as the subject
invention; with the exceptions, as depicted in FIG. 10, i.e., the
screen 140, transparent electrode 134 and the various electrical
fields herein described. Exposure and printing are preferably
carried out with the conveyor intermittently stopped although
exposure may be accomplished in line by line fashion on a
continuous basis and printing done as above described. Similarly,
sequential color reproduction may be achieved with the present
invention, in accordance with the apparatus disclosed herein
identified and as in the McFarlane application.
Also, the apparatus of FIG. 10 is useful as shown for positive or
negative reproductions. Moreover, if only negative reproductions
are contemplated, a conventional corona discharge source may
replace transparent electrode 134. All fields depicted are
preferably direct (D.C.) potential fields.
With the foregoing in mind, it will be appreciated that the
invention is preferably characterized by an insulating screen of
sufficient thickness compared to hole diameter to produce a
repulsive field within the holes when a double layer charge is
modified in accordance with the image. The conductive layer,
directly or indirectly connected to the insulator layer, provides
charging of the insulator in this double form. The conductor layer,
when maintained at a constant potential during printing, limits the
discharging effect of the ink or toner particles by shielding the
insulator screen and absorbing the charges of the particles. The
propulsion field of sufficient magnitude propels the particles to
the substrate or conductor, but has insufficient force to cause the
particles to pass through charged areas of the screen. The holes
which have less than sufficient charge to completely block the
printing material act as holes of reduced aperture thereby
permitting the reproduction of continuous tone gray scale, as in
half-tone printing. Also, the use of multiple layer configurations
has been described to protect photosensitive layers from excessive
fields, as is the case when insulator layers are used to form the
base for thin film photosensitive materials to obtain the charge
separation distance.
Alternately, if charge neutralization is not a problem, the
conductor layer may be used to establish a uniform field between
the screen and receiving surface for accurate reproduction of the
charge image, in which case the conductor layer faces the receiving
surface.
By way of example, screens having from 80 to 1,000 lines per inch
are effective for good reproduction. A screen with 200 lines per
inch will reproduce as faithfully as present-day office machines
and exhibits the characteristic that the edges of the reproduction
are clearly and strongly outlined with little or no holidays,
thereby enhancing the resolution available from this system.
It is, of course, desired that a maximum charge be carried by the
insulator of the multi-layer grid so that good and strong control
can be had at the individual apertures. It is for this reason that
several modifications of the screen are presented to encompass the
conventional materials available today. The T.sub.I /D ratio is
just as important as total charge in determining the blocking
effectiveness. This ratio, of course, is limited by construction
difficulties.
When using photosensitive materials in connection with the
apparatus of FIG. 10 a light-tight box, indicated by the dotted
line 200, is employed with suitable ingress and egress openings
being provided.
It has also been determined that highly viscous mediums are
desirable for the supply of toner material, and one example is a
suspension in fluoride gas. The preferred gap for marking material
transfer between screen and paper is of the order of 1/16 to 1/4
inch, but it should be noted that contact printing may also be
achieved with the process of this invention. Toner particles of the
order of 4 to 8 microns have been found to be operative within the
teaching of this invention to provide the good edge effects which
are readily achieved. Contact printing on any medium can be
achieved if the conductor layer faces the printed
surface--otherwise only insulators may be printed in contact.
Since further modifications of the invention within the principles
herein taught may readily occur to those skilled in the art, it is
intended that the invention be limited only by the appended claims
wherein:
* * * * *