U.S. patent number 3,811,101 [Application Number 05/340,172] was granted by the patent office on 1974-05-14 for electromagnetic resonator with electronic tuning.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Stanford Research Institute. Invention is credited to Arthur Karp.
United States Patent |
3,811,101 |
Karp |
May 14, 1974 |
ELECTROMAGNETIC RESONATOR WITH ELECTRONIC TUNING
Abstract
In a waveguide resonator, either coaxial, or non-coaxial, there
are inserted spaced irises which establish capacitances between the
conductors of the waveguide structure at the location of each iris.
These capacitances tune the resonance of the waveguide cavity,
which would generally be used in a bandpass filter. Switch means
are provided for each iris, for discretely altering the value of
the capacitance established, whereby the resonator or filter may be
tuned to a large number of different center frequencies.
Inventors: |
Karp; Arthur (Palo Alto,
CA) |
Assignee: |
Stanford Research Institute
(Menlo Park, CA)
|
Family
ID: |
23332196 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/340,172 |
Filed: |
March 12, 1973 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
333/207; 333/223;
333/209; 333/231 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H03J
5/246 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
H03J
5/24 (20060101); H03J 5/00 (20060101); H03j
005/24 (); H01p 007/04 (); H01p 007/06 () |
Field of
Search: |
;333/73W,73C,73R,82B,83R
;334/45,3,41-42 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Other References
Mode, D. E. "Coaxial Transmission-Line Filters," Pro. IRE 12-1952,
pp. 1706-1711..
|
Primary Examiner: Lawrence; James W.
Assistant Examiner: Punter; Wm. H.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Lindenberg, Freilich &
Wasserman
Claims
1. An electronically tunable waveguide resonator filter
comprising:
a rectangular coaxial waveguide having a longitudinally extending
central conductor therein,
a plurality of pairs of irises,
means for insulatingly supporting each of said pairs of irises at
predetermined distances from an end of said waveguide along the
length of said waveguide,
each of a pair of irises being supported in a common plane on
opposite sides of said central conductor, and from opposite walls
of said waveguide,
switch means for selectively altering the impedance between one
edge of each member of said pairs of irises and an adjacent
waveguide wall for changing the frequencies of the resonator filter
in a predetermined manner, and
means for electronically actuating said switch means for
effectuating said
2. An electronically tunable waveguide resonator filter as recited
in claim 1 wherein there is included a plurality of identical fine
tuning irises:
means for supporting each fine tuning iris, in the same plane as a
pair of irises, and insulatingly from a wall other than the two
opposite walls from which said pair of irises are insulatingly
supported, and
switch means for selectively altering the impedance between each of
said plurality of fine tuning irises and the wall from which they
are
3. An electronically tunable waveguide resonator filter as recited
in claim 1 wherein said switch means comprises:
a plurality of diodes connected between one edge of each of a pair
of irises and the wall from which it is insulatingly supported,
a current source, and
means for connecting said current source to a plurality of diodes
for a pair of irises to bias said diodes in a forward direction for
establishing one impedance value between said pair of irises and
said waveguide wall, or in a reverse direction for establishing a
second impedance value
4. An electronically tunable waveguide resonator filter as recited
in claim 1 wherein said switch means comprises:
a plurality of capacitor means for each pair of irises, each of
which has a large capacitance value when in one condition, a small
capacitance value when in a second condition, and means for
switching between said two capacitance values,
means for switching all of the capacitive means for a pair of
irises to have their small capacitive value when it is desired to
establish one impedance value between a pair of irises and said
waveguide wall, and
means for switching all of the capacitive means to have their large
capacitive value when it is desired to establish a second impedance
value
5. A tunable electromagnetic resonator comprising
a waveguide, said waveguide has one end thereof
short-circuited,
said waveguide has N irises insulatingly supported, spaced from one
another within said waveguide, and perpendicular to the
longitudinal axis of said waveguide at locations along said
waveguide as follows:
sin.sup.2 .pi./2 .sup.. L.sub.1 /L = 2 sin.sup.2 .pi./2 .sup..
L.sub.2 /L = 4 sin.sup.2 .pi./2 .sup.. L.sub.3 /L = 8 sin.sup.2
.pi./2 .sup.. L.sub.4 /L = . . . = 2.sup.N.sup.-1 sin.sup.2 .pi./2
.sup.. L.sub.N /L,
where L.sub.1, L.sub.2, L.sub.3, L.sub.4 . . . L.sub.N are each
locations of an iris measured from said short-circuited end of said
waveguide, and L is the distance from the short-circuited end to
the mid-plane when the waveguide is operated at half wavelength
resonance, and is the distance to the other end of said waveguide
when said waveguide is operated at quarter wavelength resonance,
and
means for selectively altering the impedance between each iris and
a wall of said waveguide to thereby alter the resonance frequency
of said
6. A tunable electromagnetic resonator as recited in claim 5 where
L.sub.1 = 0.5L, L.sub.2 = 0.333L, L.sub.3 = 0.23, L.sub.4 = 0.161L,
. . . ,
7. A tunable electromagnetic resonator as recited in claim 5
wherein said waveguide is a coaxial waveguide having a central
conductor:
each iris of said plurality of said irises comprises a pair of
irises, one iris of a pair being positioned between one side of
said central conductor and the waveguide wall opposite to said one
side, and a second iris of a pair being positioned between the
other side of said central conductor and the wall opposite to said
other side, and
said means for selectively altering the impedance between each iris
and a wall of said waveguide includes
means for simultaneously connecting or disconnecting a pair of
irises to
8. A tunable electromagnetic resonator as recited in claim 7
wherein there are provided a plurality of fine tuning irises:
means for insulatingly supporting each fine tuning iris in the same
plane as each pair of irises that are positioned on either side of
said central conductor, and
means for selectively altering the impedance between said fine
tuning irises and the adjacent waveguide wall for altering the
resonance
9. A tunable electromagnetic resonator as recited in claim 5
wherein there is included a plurality of fine tuning irises, each
of said fine tuning irises being smaller then each of said
plurality of irises:
means for insulatingly supporting said fine tuning irises spaced
from one another within said waveguide and perpendicular to the
longitudinal axis of said waveguide, and
means for selectively altering the impedance between each fine
tuning iris and a wall of said waveguide to thereby alter the
resonance frequency of
10. A tunable electromagnetic resonator as recited in claim 5
wherein said waveguide is a circular coaxial waveguide, and
each of said plurality of irises has the shape of a ring with a
central opening larger than the central conductor of said circular
coaxial
11. A tunable electromagnetic resonator as recited in claim 5
wherein said
12. A tunable electromagnetic resonator as recited in claim 5
wherein said waveguide is rectangular and each iris of said
plurality of pairs of irises comprises a pair of irises,
one iris of a pair being insulatingly supported from one wall of
said waveguide,
the other iris of a pair being insulatingly supported from the
opposite wall of said waveguide, there being a space between the
opposite ends of said irises, and
said means for selectively altering the impedance between each iris
and a wall of said waveguide being connected between each iris of a
pair and the
13. A tunable electromagnetic resonator as recited in claim 5
wherein said means for selectively altering the impedance between
each iris and a wall of said waveguide includes:
a plurality of diodes,
means for biasing said diode in reverse direction when it is
desired to increase the impedance between an iris and an adjacent
wall, and
means for biasing said diodes in a forward direction when it is
desired to
14. A tunable electromagnetic resonator as recited in claim 6
wherein said means for selectively altering the impedance between
each iris and a wall of said waveguide comprises:
a plurality of switches for each iris,
means for closing said switches for each iris when it is desired to
lower the impedance between an iris and an adjacent wall, and
means for opening the switches for each iris when it is desired to
increase
15. A tunable electromagnetic resonator as recited in claim 5
wherein said means for selectively altering the impedance between
each iris and a wall of said waveguide for each iris comprises:
a plurality of capacitor means each of which has a large
capacitance value when in one condition, a small capacitance value
when in a second condition, and means for switching between said
two capacitance values,
means for switching all of the capacitor means to their large
capacitance value when it is desired to reduce the impedance
between an iris and a wall of said waveguide, and
means for switching all of the capacitor means to their small
capacitance value when it is desired to raise the impedance between
said iris and the
16. A tunable resonator filter comprising
a waveguide having a central conductor extending longitudinally
therethrough,
said waveguide having one end thereof short-circuited,
N iris means within said waveguide distributed at predetermined
spaced positions along the length of said waveguide for
establishing a first capacitance between each of said iris means
and one wall of said spaced waveguide, and a second capacitance
between each of said iris means and the central conductor,
said N iris means being insulatingly supported at locations along
said waveguide as follows: L, 0.5L, 0.333L, 0.23L, 0.161L, . . . ,
2L/.pi. arc sin 1/2.sup.N.sup.-1, where L is the distance from the
short-circuited end of said waveguide to its other end when the
resonator filter length is a quarter wavelength and L is the
distance from the short-circuited end of said waveguide to its
mid-plane when the resonator filter length is one half length,
and
means for selectively altering the value of one of the capacitance
established by said plurality of iris means for varying the
signal
17. A tunable resonator filter as recited in claim 16 wherein said
waveguide is rectangular, and
each of said iris means comprises a pair of rectangular diaphragms
mounted in a common plane one between one wall and said central
conductor, and the other between the wall opposite to said one
wall, and the central
18. A tunable resonator filter as recited in claim 16 wherein said
waveguide is circular, and
each of said iris means comprises a ring-shaped diaphragm having a
central
19. A tunable resonator filter as recited in claim 16 wherein said
means for selectively altering the value of one of the capacitances
established by said plurality of iris means comprises:
a plurality of diode means coupling each iris means to a wall of
said waveguide, and
means for applying bias to said diodes for altering the value of
one of the
20. A turnable resonator filter as recited in claim 16 wherein said
means for selectively altering the value of one of the capacitances
established by said plurality of iris means comprises:
a plurality of bistable capacitance means coupling each iris to a
waveguide wall, and
means for driving each plurality of bistable capacitance means to
one or the other of its stable states.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to electronically tuned filters, and more
particularly, to improvements therein.
OBJECTS AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
An object of this invention is the provision of a novel
construction for affording electronic tuning of a high power VHF,
UHF or microwave resonator used in a bandpass or other filter.
Another object of this invention is the provision of a novel and
simple tuning arrangement for a waveguide-type of resonator.
Yet another object of this invention is the provision of a
VHF/UHF/microwave resonator which is capable of being tuned rapidly
and reliably over a long period of time.
The foregoing and other objects of the invention may be achieved in
a waveguide resonator which is distributively loaded with several
identical, but independent capacitive irises. Switches are
connected in these irises which are operable to enable the
effective capacitance of an iris to be altered from one discrete
value to another to thereby tune the filter resonator to be
responsive to different frequencies. Additionally, the distribution
pattern for the irises may be determined such that the tuning
increment resulting from the switching of each member of the series
of irises are related very closely in a binary manner.
The novel features of the invention are set forth with
particularity in the appended claims. The invention will best be
understood from the following description when read in conjunction
with the accompanying drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a bandpass filter resonator in
accordance with this invention, which is operated in a half-wave
mode.
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of this invention,
which is operated in a quarter-wave mode.
FIG. 3 is a view in longitudinal section of a bandpass filter in
accordance with this invention.
FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view along the lines 4--4 of FIG. 3.
FIG. 5 is a schematic representation of a suitable switching system
for tuning each iris of the filter resonator.
FIG. 6 is a longitudinal sectional view showing additional details
of the invention.
FIG. 7 is a cross-sectional view illustrating an alternative
embodiment for switching each iris in the invention represented by
FIG. 6.
FIG. 8 illustrates in cross-section, the installation details of
each of the miniature high speed mechanical switches used in the
iris embodiment of the invention shown in FIG. 7.
FIG. 9 is a longitudinal section and FIG. 10 is a cross-sectional
of an embodiment of the invention that uses a waveguide without a
central conductor.
FIG. 11 is an end view, in cross-section, of an embodiment of the
invention, that uses pairs of irises in a waveguide without a
central conductor.
FIG. 12 is an end view in cross-section illustrating the appearance
of the invention in a circular coaxial waveguide.
FIG. 13 is an end view in cross-section of the invention using a
circular waveguide without a central inner conductor.
FIG. 14 is a cross-sectional view of a bistable capacitor which may
be used with this invention instead of a switch that goes from
conducting to non-conducting.
FIGS. 15 and 16 supplement FIG. 14 in showing the moving element of
FIG. 14 in its two possible stable positions.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
FIG. 1 illustrates schematically, the equivalent circuit of a
transmission line (generally coaxial) resonator distributively
loaded with independent switch-controlled capacitive irises in
accordance with this invention. As will be seen in later drawings,
each iris is insulatedly supported between a central conductor and
the wall of the waveguide (in the case of a TEM-line), or between
the waveguide walls, and thereby establishes a capacitance,
designated as C.sub.1 between the iris and the central conductor,
or one wall, and a capacitance designated as C.sub.2 between the
iris and the other wall of the waveguide. The capacitors C.sub.1
and C.sub.2 effectively are connected in series and all of the
series connected capacitances C.sub.1, C.sub.2 effectively are
distributed along the length of the transmission line and separated
by distances that are significant fractions of a wavelength.
Switches respectively 10, 12, 14, 16 and 18 are shown for
selectively short-circuiting, or otherwise altering the value of,
each one of the C.sub.2 capacitances. In the case where the
switches are PIN diodes, a biasing adjunct, such as a choke, (not
shown) is needed for each switch. The incidental influence of a
choke on the circuit is schematically represented by a reactance 20
and a resistance 22. For simplicity, a showing of these in all
places has been omitted, except near switch 12. The resistance 24
represents a "switch open" equivalent resistance (R.sub.p) and
resistance 26 represents the "switch closed" equivalent resistance
(R.sub.s). For clarity, a showing of these in all places has been
omitted, except near switch 16.
If the cavity resonator is to be used as a filter e.g., band stop
or band pass, coupling to external circuits is required. This is
done with one or more coupling probes or loops which can be located
anywhere convenient in the cavity resonator. FIG. 1 shows schematic
symbols 28, 30 for the case of two coupling loops at the opposite
short-circuited ends of the transmission-line resonator.
In the absence of the irises, the fundamental resonant frequency,
f.sub.0, of the transmission-line resonator is c/4l where c is the
phase velocity of the waveguide, and l is the cavity half length,
and the (transverse) electric field in the resonator would have a
half-sine-wave distribution with a maximum in the mid-plane. The
irises that are added are identified according to their distance
from the nearest short circuiting plane; it is convenient to
specify the distances .theta..sub.i as "electrical angles" relative
to .theta..sub.1 (distance from short to mid-plane) being defined
as 90.degree.. That is, as shown on the drawing, the mid-plane iris
is a distance .theta..sub.1 or 90.degree. from the end of the
waveguide. An iris is considered to be more or less "significant"
to the resonator as .theta. is larger or smaller.
The principal capacitance provided by the iris is C.sub.1, but
since the switches exhibit capacitance when "open," and are
supported between conductors providing additional capacitance, it
is necessary to include the capacitance C.sub.2 as shown in the
drawing. The iris capacitance is thus two valued
C.sub.max = C.sub.1 with switch closed.
C.sub.min = C.sub.1 .sup.. C.sub.2 /C.sub.1 + C.sub.2 with switch
opened.
Since the usefulness of an iris depends on having C.sub.max
/C.sub.min large, it is seen as desirable to have C.sub.2 <
C.sub.1, and preferably C.sub.2 << C.sub.1.
Having all the irises identical, has many advantages, including
keeping C.sub.max /C.sub.min optimal. The significance of an iris
for tuning purposes is then determined solely by its location
relative to the E field distribution. If iris loading is assumed
not to alter this half-sin-wave distribution, and irises are
assumed not to interact with one another, the capacitive effect of
an iris should be weighted as sin .theta..sub.i, i = 1, 2, 3, . . .
, N.
Further, assuming that it is a law of nature for a "frequency
tuning effect" to vary as the (-1/2) power of a "capacitive
effect," a binary tuning program would be achieved if sin.sup.2
.theta..sub.i = 1, 1/2, 1/4, 1/8 . . . 1/2.sup.N.sup.-1, where N is
the total number of irises. The following table is derived from the
last equation.
TABLE 1
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IRIS PLACEMENT FOR A BINARY TUNING
PROGRAM Iris Nominal No. "Frequency- Distance (i=) Tuning Effect"
sin.sup.2 .theta..sub.i .theta..sub.i from Short
__________________________________________________________________________
1 1/2 of the tuning range 1 90.degree. l 2 1/4 of the tuning range
1/2 45.degree. 0.500 l 3 1/8 of the tuning range 1/4 30.degree.
0.333 l 4 1/16 of the tuning range 1/8 20.7.degree. 0.230 l 5 1/32
of the tuning range 1/16 14.5.degree. 0.161 l . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . N 1/2.sup.N of the tuning range 1/2.sup.N.sup.-1
sin.sup.-.sup.1 [2.sup.-.sup.(N.sup.-1)/2 ] 2.theta ..sub.i
__________________________________________________________________________
l/.pi.
The inductive reasoning used in deriving the table is far from
rigorous. Nevertheless, it has in practice proved workable;
computations and measurements made with the resonator loaded with
five irises positioned as indicated have yielded an essentially
binary tuning logic as evidenced by a substantially uniform spacing
of 32 resonances over a 21 percent tuning range obtained by
operating the switches of the five irises in all of their
combinations.
The locations of the irises may be determined as those which
satisfy the following relationship:
sin.sup.2 .pi./2 .sup.. L.sub.1 /L = 2 sin.sup.2 .pi./2 .sup..
L.sub.2 /L = 4 sin.sup.2 .pi./2 .sup.. L.sub.3 /L = 8 sin.sup.2
.pi./2 .sup.. L.sub.4 /L = . . . = 2.sup.N.sup.-1 sin.sup.2 .pi./2
.sup.. L.sub.N /L,
where L.sub.1, L.sub.2, L.sub.3, L.sub.4 . . . L.sub.N are each
locations of an iris measured from the short-circuited end of the
waveguide, and L is the distance from the short-circuited end to
the mid-plane, where the waveguide is operated at half wavelength
resonance.
FIG. 2 is the equivalent circuit of a transmission-line resonator
which is shorter than in FIG. 1 because it is quater-wave resonant,
having one end open-circuited and the other end short-circuited.
The switches 31 through 34, respectively, are employed for
selectively short circuiting (or otherwise modifying) the
capacitors C.sub.2. As previously, the resonator is coupled to
external circuits through one or more coupling probes or loops. The
illustration shows symbols for 2 coupling loops, 35, (one for
input, and one for output in the case of a bandpass filter) both
located at the short-circuited end of the resonator. Other
arragnements would work as well. A choice as to which the 2
embodiments is to be used depends upon the particular application
to be served and the frequencies of interest. However, the
resonator arrangement shown in FIG. 2 is less advantageous at
higher frequencies than the one shown in FIG. 1, due to the
mechanical inconvenience of having irises closer together in the
embodiment of FIG. 2 and the greater likelihood of unwanted
interactions between the irises.
Here, the locations of the irises may be determined as those which
satisfy the equation
sin.sup.2 .pi./2 .sup.. L.sub.1 /L = 2 sin.sup.2 .pi./2 .sup..
L.sub.2 /L = 4 sin.sup.2 .pi./2 .sup.. L.sub.3 /L = 8 sin.sup.2
.pi./2 .sup.. L.sub.4 /L - . . . = 2.sup.N.sup.-1 sin.sup.2 .pi./2
.sup.. L.sub.N /L,
where L.sub.1, L.sub.2, L.sub.3, L.sub.4 . . . L.sub.N are each
locations of an iris measured from the short-circuited end of the
waveguide, and L is the distance from the short-circuited end to
the open-circuited end of the waveguide, where the waveguide is
operated at quarter wavelength resonance.
FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional and plan view of an embodiment of the
invention, and FIG. 4 is a slightly enlarged view along the lines
4--4 of FIG. 3. The TEM waveguide 36 has a central conductor 37. By
way of example, five pairs of irises such as pair 38, 39, are
insulatingly supported in the same plane on opposite sides of the
central conductor 37. For binary tuning, these pairs of irises are
placed at locations corresponding to those shown in FIG. 1. As will
become more clear later herein, a pair of irises is treated as
equivalent to a single iris. The irises 38, 39 are the central
irises. The irises are supported in position, within the waveguide,
by pairs of dielectric spacers, such as spacers, 40, 41, 42 and
44.
In one embodiment of the invention, diodes such as "PIN" diodes,
were used as switches for shorting the capacitance C.sub.2, which
is established between the iris and the wall of the waveguide.
C.sub.1 is the capacitance established between the iris and the
inner conductor of the waveguide. The diodes respectively, 44, 46,
48 and 50, may be seen in FIG. 4, supported from the waveguide wall
and connected between the wall and the respective irises 38, 39 of
the pair. It should be clear to those familiar with the art that
interchanging the positions of fixed capacitance, C.sub.1, and the
switch-associated capacitance, C.sub.2, with respect to being near
either the inner or the outer conductor of the coaxial line, does
not constitute a deviation from the intent of this invention, and
therefore is within the scope of this invention and the claims
directed thereto.
Diodes of the PIN type, which were found suitable for this type of
switching operation includes, for example, the UN7000C series
diodes, which are manufactured by Unitrode Corporation, Watertown,
Massachusetts. The diodes were preferably connected in parallel
between the iris and the biasing sources supplied, and have a
forward current applied to simulate a switch-closed position and a
reverse bias voltage applied when they simulate a switch-open
position. The number of diodes to be used is determined by
considerations of resonator Q, as influenced by diode losses when
"closed" (forward-bias) and when "open" (reverse-bias). In the
former case, having more diodes in parallel reduces the loss, but
in the latter case, it increases the loss. A compromise is
therefore made so that the two situations will yield about the same
loss. This is necessary because, in general, some of the irises in
the filter will have forward-biased diodes at the same time as
other irises have reverse-biased diodes. It may also be noted that
if too few diodes are used in parallel, the resonator tuning plan,
and the resonator Q, may be adversely affected by switch
inductances and RF current crowding problems. In the UHF resonator
being discussed as an illustrative embodiment of the invention and
using the diodes mentioned, two diodes per iris half gave the
substantially correct balance.
The rectangular-cross-section construction shown in the drawings is
very convenient, although the invention should not be considered as
limited thereto. A circularly symmetrical cross-section might lead
to smaller dimensions for a given resonator, but the iris
sub-assembly might be more difficult to place.
A fine tuning iris, 52, is shown in FIG. 4, supported on dielectric
spacers 56, 58, from the side of the waveguide, and it has a single
diode switch 60. The fine tuning iris is so called because the
tuning increment that its switching in or out provides is less than
that of any of the broad double-sided "coarse-tuning" irises
distributed throughout the resonator. The entire set of fine-tuning
irises form a second set of binary tuning increments. For example,
if the tuning increments provided by the coarse-tuning set are 1/2,
1/4, 1/8, 1/16 and 1/32 of the tuning range, then the tuning
increments of the fine-tuning set are 1/64, 1/128, 1/256, 1/512 and
1/1024 of the tuning range. Each fine-tuning iris is located in the
same place as a coarse-tuning iris pair because the locations of
the fine-tuning set are also derived from the table given above.
Creating a second type or style of iris is done when there is
mechanically too little room to insert irises of the original type
having locations .theta..sub.i between 0.degree. and
14.5.degree..
A highly asymmetrical rectangular cross-section was considered for
the coaxial waveguide with the RF fields concentrated on one side,
so that a single iris plate (instead of two) would suffice, located
on that same side. It was found however, that for the same
impedance and resonator Q, an excessively large volume would be
needed on the unused side. That is, when the resonator volume and,
hence, cross-sectional area are limited, one obtains the greatest
unloaded Q for a given impedance when using the available area for
a bilaterally symmetrical cross-section. An asymmetrical
cross-section nevertheless, should not be excluded from the intent
of this invention.
In actual application, it has been found that after five or six
irises have been installed in a UHF filter, the spacing between
irises, and between an iris and an end wall, start to become
inconveniently small. Hence, if the tuning range is required to be
divided into more than 32 or 64 parts, more irises must be added,
though not very many, since the number of tuning channels doubles
for each additional iris. Although there are several solutions to
this problem, the one chosen here was to shape the 5 original
(coarse tuning) irises such that they would not fill up the entire
resonator cross-section. Room is left for the small, interpolating,
or "fine tuning" iris, such as 52, which is in the same transverse
plane as the coarse tuning iris. If the tuning effectiveness of the
fine tuning iris is 1/32 of that of the coarse tuning iris, and if
there is negligible interaction between them, the progressive
halvings of tuning increments by each iris in turn would be
continued from the five coarse to the five fine tuning irises,
whereby a total of 1024 resonances can be made available.
With the use of the PIN diodes in the filter structure, it becomes
necessary to bring the bias leads for the diodes into the RF
region. This should be done without degrading the RF performance.
After giving consideration to a series connection of pairs of
diodes with opposite polarities (for d-c) that would insert bypass
capacitors rather than bias leads into the RF region, it was
decided instead, to use a resonant bias choke, such as the resonant
bias chokes 62, 64, 66, which are shown in FIG. 4, which are
provided for each iris plate. The bias chokes for the central iris
were tuned to resonance (by adjusting the number of turns) at the
center of the upper half of the tuning range because the diodes
short this choke over the entire lower half of the tuning
range.
The remaining bias chokes were tuned to approximately the center of
the tuning range. Each choke, as may be seen in FIG. 4, has one end
which is connected to an iris, and the other end is connected to
the respective choke shield, 68, 70, 72, which surround the chokes.
A "DC break" is provided between the choke shield and the wall of
the waveguide. This break is nothing more than a spacing which has
very little effect on the circuit, since these breaks are located
as close as possible to the high impedance end of the choke.
However, to minimize any possible RF leakage due to the break, the
gap is filled with a thin Mylar tape forming a by-pass capacitance
of at least 65 pf. Input and output coupling loops, 74, 76, are
shown in FIG. 3. While these loops are shown at one end of the
resonator, it will be appreciated that these may be used at both
ends if required.
FIG. 5 is a circuit diagram of an arrangement for biasing the
diodes in a forward or reverse direction (switch closed or switch
open). While the circuit is shown for a single iris, and its
associated diodes, it will be appreciated that a switching
arrangement is required for each iris. Pairs of plates for the
double irises are switched simultaneously. Two diodes, respectively
82, 84, are connected in parallel between the iris 80 and the
waveguide walls 81, by way of illustration. The bias choke 86 has
one end connected to the iris 80, and the other end connected to
one terminal of a selector switch 88. When in one position, (the
upper) the selector switch allows a direct current to flow from
anodes to cathodes of both diodes. When the switch 88 is in its
other position, a large negative voltage is applied to the anodes
of the two diodes.
Operation of the switch is performed by the switch control 90.
It will be appreciated that the switch 88 and its control 90 are
representative of any electronic switching arrangement, many of
which are well known in the art, which can operate at the speed
desired to effectuate switching. It should also be appreciated that
the total number of switches 88 and controls 90 equals the number
of pairs of coarse-tuning iris plates plus the number of
fine-tuning irises, or 10 in the case being illustrated. This is
consistent with the total number of resonant frequencies for the
illustrated resonator being 2.sup.10 or 1024.
FIG. 6 is a schematic view in longitudinal section of the interior
of the waveguide 36, shown to illustrate, by way of example, and
not by way of a limitation, some typical dimensions for a UHF
bandpass filter, made in accordance with this invention, and in
FIG. 4, the cross-section, which is also shown to demonstrate the
weights, or effects, of the coarse and fine tuning irises on the
tuning of the filter. Only four fine tuning irises are shown in
FIG. 6, and these are given the numbers six, seven, eight and nine,
which indicate their weights, as 1/2.sup.N where N is the weighting
number. The numbers one, two, three, four and five indicate the
weights of the coarse tuning irises. This illustration thus gives a
filter with 2.sup.9 or 512 resonant frequencies rather than the
2.sup.10 or 1024 discussed previously. The depth of the interior of
the waveguide (top to bottom dimensions of the view shown in FIG.
4) is 3.24 in.
While each of the five coarse tuning irises is comprised of two
halves, that could be switched separately if so desired, (although
the 1024 resultant resonances with the fine tuning irises omitted
would definitely not cover the tuning range uniformly), generally,
asymmetrical iris switching results in RF current crowding that is
very detrimental to the unloaded Q. When the switches are low loss,
such asymmetries must be avoided; however, in the present
invention, the switch losses predominate, and so mask these
asymmetry-crowding losses. Nevertheless, this invention is
compatible with low loss switches, and therefore, the halves of the
coarse tuning irises are switched in unison.
Table 2 reproduced below, represents a small excerpt from the
results which were obtained by measuring the performance of the
filter using an automatic network analyzer. The column with the
heading "Code" designates the "off-on" settings of the iris
switches. 0 designates off, or reverse biased diodes, and 1
designates on, or forward biased diodes. The five binary digits
commencing with the left side of the code number represent the
settings of the five coarse tuning irises, and the remaining four
digits represent the settings of the four fine tuning irises.
Column 2 which is labeled "DEBC" represents the decimal equivalent
of the binary number shown under "Code." The next column indicates
the frequency in megahertz.
The following columns list, respectively, frequency (in megahertz)
and insertion loss (in decibels) corresponding to phase shifts
through the filter of -45.degree., 0.degree., and +45.degree.
respectively. The phase shift notation 0 indicates the central
resonant frequency of the filter while the phase shifts -45.degree.
and +45.degree. locate the edges of its pass band (where the
insertion loss is within 3dB of that at band center) at a given
switch control combination. Frequency difference from the previous
entry is also listed.
Using a computer command system and electronic switching, the
center frequency of the illustrated bandpass filter could be
rapidly tuned from 359.25 MHz at decimal number 0 (binary
000000000) down to 293.84 MHz at decimal number 511 (binary
111111111). ##SPC1##
FIG. 7 is a waveguide cross-section which illustrates another
embodiment of this invention, based on high-speed mechanical
switches instead of semiconductor diode switches. The outer wall 92
of the coaxial waveguide encloses the inner conductor 94 and two
coarse tuning iris halves 96, 98 are supported perpendicularly
thereto on opposite sides and in the same plane by means of
insulators 100, 102, 104, and 106. For insuring a low-loss but
flexible connection to the switches (112, 113, for example) which
are used to connect across the capacitance established between the
wall of the waveguide and the iris plates, a plurality of U-shaped
copper braids, 108, 110, for example, are used. Each of these
copper braids is conductively connected to an iris by the ends of
the U, and the center of each U is connected to one terminal of a
switch (112, 113, for example) whose other terminal is connected to
the waveguide walls 92. By way of example, each of the iris halves
96, 98 has 5 of these copper braids or flexible straps.
The details of a braid connection and a switch mounting are shown
in FIG. 8, which is an enlarged and sectional view of these
structures, such as braid 114, for example. Some of the
qualifications for a switch which is to be used are that it be
bistable and have a high open switch resistance (R.sub.p), rapid
and positive operation, longevity and a very low closed switch
resistance (R.sub.s). By way of illustration, one suitable switch
which was incorporated in an embodiment of the invention is known
as a Logcell I, which is manufactured by Fifth Dimension Inc., of
Princeton, N.J. This switch has mercury contacts, is glass
enclosed, and is solenoid operated. This switch is referred to by
the reference numeral 116. At one end is pin 118 which is grasped
by pin socket 120 that is inserted conductively into the copper
braid 114. The socket 120 also has springs 122, 124, which help
grasp the switch pin 118. As a result, a low loss connection is
made between the switch 116 and the copper braid without applying
undue mechanical stress to the thin glass walls of the switch
capsule.
The part of the switch below the pin 118 is formed of glass, and
thus is an insulator. The switch is held in place, by a clamping
shim 126, which is attached to the waveguide cavity wall. The
switch central contact 125 is grounded to the wall. A solenoid 128,
which is used for the operation of the switch is adjacent the other
end thereof, and is placed within the waveguide wall. The solenoid
is connected to a switch control circuit 130, which provides the
necessary current pulse for energizing the solenoid when it is
desired to open or close the switch. The other end of the switch is
also a pin 132 which is surrounded by a soft iron sleeve 134. The
pin 132 is not connected to anything, but serves to locate the iron
sleeve 134 which is part of the magnetic circuit. If desired,
however, pin 132 may be connected to an electro-visual indicator
that monitors the state of the switch; when the switch 116 is open
on the RF side (upper end), the pin 132 is at ground potential,
while pin 132 is floating when switch 116 is closed at the RF end.
It will be understood that a switch is required for each copper
braid connected to an iris. As illustrated in FIG. 7, each iris has
5 parallelled switches. The switches for each pair of coarse tuning
iris plates are operated simultaneously in a manner well known to
the art.
FIG. 9 is a longitudinal section of an electronically controllable
bandpass filter, in accordance with this invention, showing irises
131 A, B, C, D and E, insulatingly supported in a waveguide 133,
without a central conductor. FIG. 10 is a view along the lines
10--10 of FIG. 9. Each of these irises is supported from one wall
of the waveguide by an arrangement such as is shown in FIG. 10, for
example. This includes insulators 136, 138 and diodes 140, 142, for
example. The switching arrangement is the same as is shown in FIG.
5. This system may also use switches as described in connection
with FIGS. 7 and 8. The purpose of these switches, as has been
described previously, is to short-out or alter the value of the
capacitance between the iris and the side of the waveguide from
which it is suspended. Other capacitances are established between
the other sides of the rectangular irises and the walls of the
waveguide opposite which they are adjacent. It is also within the
scope of this invention to also insert switches of the capacitance
changing type (as is described later herein) but not of the
completely-closing type, between the iris and these other
walls.
FIG. 11 illustrates by an end view in section a variation of the
arrangement shown in FIGS. 9 and 10. The variation consists of
using pairs of irises, 135, 137 in a waveguide 133 instead of
single irises. Here the capacitance C.sub.1 is established between
the opposite inner edges of the two irises and the capacitance
C.sub.2 between the outer edges of the pair of irises and the
waveguide wall.
FIG. 12 illustrates, in an end view in section, an embodiment of
the invention using a circular coaxial waveguide. A ring-shaped
iris 139 is employed at each iris location, which has a hole in the
center which is large enough to permit the central conductor 141 to
pass therethrough and to provide for space whereby C.sub.1 is
established. Each iris is insulatingly supported from the walls by
spacers, such as 143. A plurality of switches, such as 144, are
provided to short or alter the value of the capacitance C.sub.2,
which is established between the outer edge of the iris and the
waveguide wall.
FIG. 13 illustrates, in an end view in section, an embodiment of
the invention using a circular waveguide without inner conductor.
Here, the iris 146 is circular or ring-shaped also, has a central
aperture 148, and is insulatingly and centrally supported, spaced
from the wall 150 of the waveguide. Support is by spaced insulators
152, for example. A plurality of spaced switches 154 for example,
are used for connecting the outer edge of the iris to the wall.
Another type of switch which may be used with any or all of the
embodiments of the invention which are described and shown herein
is a bistable capacitor. FIG. 14 is a cross-sectional view of such
a device. FIGS. 15 and 16 are simplified cross-sectional views of
the device illustrating two operating positions. A glass or ceramic
hollow capsule 160 contains a permanent magnet shuttle 162. This
should have a gold coating which is a good RF conductor. The length
of the shuttle is slightly more than half the length of the capsule
and the remainder of its interior is filled with a lubricating
dielectric gas or fluid. One end of the capsule is fitted in a
socket 164 which extends along the axis of the capsule and has a
flange 166 which extends at right angles to the socket 164,
adjacent its open end. This flange constitutes R.F. ground and is
connected to the waveguide wall 168. The socket 164 terminates in
an iron core 164 terminates in an iron core 168 around which there
is wound a solenoid winding 170.
There is another conductive socket 172, which fits over the other
end of the capsule 160. This socket is fitted into intimate contact
with the flexible strap (copper braid) 174 which connects to an
iris. The socket 172 has an iron plug 176.
The magnetic slug 162 is pulled to the end of the capsule plugged
into socket 164 (ground end) when a pulse having one polarity is
applied to the solenoid winding 170 from a pulse source 178. The
magnetic shuttle is pushed to the other end of the capsule ("hot"
end) in response to a pulse of the opposite polarity applied to the
solenoid winding. Magnetic forces hold the shuttle in one or the
other of its end positions after the solenoid pulse is ended. The
capacitor is thus bistable and requires very little driving power.
Its switching speed should be comparable to that of the mercury
switch of comparable size, mentioned earlier, but the losses due to
the mercury and the oxides in the metal/glass seals of the latter
are eliminated. To those skilled in the art, variations on the
magnetic circuitry illustrated are seen not to alter the spirit of
the invention, which is to provide a multi-iris-tuned,
high-frequency resonator in which the capacitance associated with
each iris is altered from one value to another by a bistable
mechanical capacitor, rather than shorted-out by a
contact-to-contact switch. (The use of a solid-state variable
capacitor, or varactor, for this function is not preferred because
that device would not allow high RF power levels to be used with
the filter or resonator and would introduce distortion of the RF
waves).
The capacitance between the sockets of the bistable capacitor shown
in FIG. 14 goes between capacitance values C.sub.A and C.sub.B
where C.sub.A << C.sub.B. Because C.sub.B would have a
typical value of only a few picofarads, its use is at high
frequency RF. C.sub.A is obtained when the magnetic shuttle is at
the ground end of the capsule (FIG. 15) and C.sub.B when it is at
the "hot" end of the capsule (FIG. 16). When this device is used in
the gap between an iris and a waveguide wall, the design equations
become:
C.sub.2A = C.sub.2 + nC.sub.A (shuttles clearing gap between
sockets)
or
C.sub.2B = C.sub.2 + nC.sub.B (shuttles closing gap between
sockets)
C iris.sub.(min) = C.sub.1 C.sub.2A /C.sub.1 +C.sub.2A
C iris.sub.(max) = C.sub.1 C.sub.2B /C.sub.1 +C.sub.2B
where n is the number of devices in parallel.
If C.sub.B >> C.sub.A and nC.sub.B >> C.sub.1, the use
of a bistable capacitor of the type shown has very little effect on
the design of a high-frequency resonator or filter system from that
based on open/closed switches. However, the resonator Q would be
much higher and the filter would have a narrower bandwidth and/or
lower insertion loss.
There has accordingly been described and shown herein a novel and
useful electronically-tunable VHF/UHF/microwave resonator, such as
would be used in a bandpass or other filter. The filter parameters,
such as the range limits, loaded and unloaded Q, bandwidth, VSWR,
and insertion loss, are determined almost solely by the losses in
the more significant irises. As a result, a filter is provided
whose basic design is independent of the ultimate tuning increment
desired. Less-significant irises can be added or deleted at any
time, giving a smaller or larger tuning increment, without
affecting the performance for any one channel.
* * * * *