U.S. patent number 3,787,261 [Application Number 05/221,362] was granted by the patent office on 1974-01-22 for process for texturizing fibers obtained by splitting synthetic foils and products made therefrom.
This patent grant is currently assigned to VEB Textilkombinat Cottbus. Invention is credited to Adolf Heger, Helmar Passler, Ellen Patitz.
United States Patent |
3,787,261 |
Heger , et al. |
January 22, 1974 |
PROCESS FOR TEXTURIZING FIBERS OBTAINED BY SPLITTING SYNTHETIC
FOILS AND PRODUCTS MADE THEREFROM
Abstract
Fibers obtained by splitting synthetic foils and the resulting
products are texturized by subjecting the foil or the fibers
obtained after splitting and prior to their separation to a
cross-sectionally differential modifying action, and thereafter
contacting the modified foil or fibers with a shrinking agent, or
subjecting the foil or fibers to stretching.
Inventors: |
Heger; Adolf (Dresden,
DT), Passler; Helmar (Dresden, DT), Patitz;
Ellen (Dresden, DT) |
Assignee: |
VEB Textilkombinat Cottbus
(Cottbus, DT)
|
Family
ID: |
22827497 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/221,362 |
Filed: |
January 27, 1972 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
156/84; 26/69A;
28/259; 156/273.3 |
Current CPC
Class: |
D02G
1/00 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
D02G
1/00 (20060101); D02g 001/00 () |
Field of
Search: |
;156/84,85,272
;8/DIG.12,DIG.21,116,114.5 ;28/DIG.1,72.17,72HR,72.1 ;26/69A
;264/342,132 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Other References
Davies-"Radiation Induced Graft Polymerisation on to Nylon and
Cotton Fabrics," Textile Institute and Industry, Jan. 1966, pp.
11-15..
|
Primary Examiner: Leavitt; Alfred L.
Assistant Examiner: Frisenda; Frank
Attorney, Agent or Firm: Striker; Michael S.
Claims
What is claimed as new and desired to be protected by Letters
Patent is set
1. In a process for making crimped fibers and products of the
latter wherein the fibers are obtained by fibrillation of synthetic
foils, the steps of irradiating a foil, or the fibers obtained by
fibrillation of the same but prior to their separation, so as to
cause differential modification of the structure of said foil or
said fibers through the cross section thereof; and treating the
irradiated foil or fibers so as to
2. A process as defined in claim 1, wherein said foil or fibers
are
3. A process as defined in claim 1, and further comprising the step
of subjecting said foil or fibers to unidirectional stretching
prior to the
4. A process as defined in claim 1, wherein said foil or fibers are
composed of a synthetic polymer which undergoes differential
crosslinking
5. A process as defined in claim 1, wherein said foil or fibers are
composed of a synthetic polymer which undergoes differential
degradation
6. A process as defined in claim 1, wherein said foil or fibers are
composed of a synthetic polymer which undergoes differential
grafting
7. A process as defined in claim 1, wherein the step of irradiating
said foil or fibers comprises adjusting the magnitude of
high-energy radiation so that the effects of the same extend
substantially throughout the entire cross sections of said foil or
fibers; and further comprising the step of heating one major
surface of the foil or the unseparated fibers and cooling the other
major surface of said foil or unseparated fibers to thereby cause
differential modification of the structure of said foil or
8. A process as defined in claim 1, wherein the step of irradiating
said foil or fibers comprises adjusting the magnitude of
high-energy radiation so as to limit the effects of the same to
only a portion of the total
9. A process as defined in claim 1, wherein the step of treating
said
10. A process as defined in claim 1, wherein the step of treating
said irradiated fibers comprises heating the same to a temperature
sufficient to cause shrinkage of said fibers and simultaneous
bonding of the same to
11. A process as defined in claim 1, wherein said foil or fibers
are composed of a synthetic polymer which undergoes differential
cross-linking
12. A process as defined in claim 1, wherein said foil or fibers
are composed of a synthetic polymer which undergoes differential
cross-linking
13. A process as defined in claim 1, wherein said foil or fibers
are composed of a synthetic polymer which undergoes differential
degradation
14. A process as defined in claim 1, wherein said foil or fibers
are composed of a synthetic polymer which undergoes differential
cross-linking, differential degradation and differential grafting
during said process.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to a process for texturizing fibers obtained
by splitting synthetic foils. It also relates to texturizing the
resulting products, such as filaments, non-woven fabrics, and
similar sheet fabrics.
Processes are known for texturizing filaments wherein the
texturizing is for instance effected by compression in compression
chambers, by applying pinions to the thread, followed by fixation
of the resulting impressions, or by tangling the initial threads by
means of an air current. These processes have the shortcoming that
they are suited for the old type of fiber materials, but do not
sufficiently account for the specific properties of fibers obtained
by splitting synthetic foils.
A process is also known for texturizing filaments wherein
texturizing effects are obtained by using materials having
different shrink characteristics. The shortcoming of these
processes is that they require at least two fiber components which
have different shrinking properties.
It is an object of the present invention to provide for a process
for texturizing filaments which avoids the shortcomings of the
prior-art processes, and in particular does not require the use of
two fiber components with different shrinking properties.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention resides in a process wherein the foil or the fibers,
after splitting the foil but prior to their separation, are
subjected to a cross-sectionally differential modifying action,
whereupon the modified foil or fibers are then contacted with a
shrinking agent or subjected to stretching to obtain a texturizing
effect.
The novel features which are considered as characteristic for the
invention are set forth in particular in the appended claims. The
invention itself, however, both as to its structure and its method
of operation, together with additional objects and advantages
thereof, will best be understood from the following description of
specific embodiments when read in connection with the drawing.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
The three FIGURES illustrate, in diagrammatic form, different
embodiments of the process of the invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
The invention relates to various kinds of synthetic fibers and
foils from which fibers may be obtained by a splitting action. It
is particularly applicable to polyolefins such as polyethylene but
also to polyamides, polyesters and cellulosic textiles. Preferably,
the foil is subjected to an initial unidirectional stretching
action before the modifying treatment of the invention is applied.
The amount of stretching depends on the type of polymer and will
affect particularly the degree of texturizing obtained in the
subsequent treatment.
The shrinking action applied to the modified foil or fibers can be
effected with hot air, steam or other shrinking agents.
The modifying action itself may be carried out in various manners.
For instance, the foil or not-yet-separated fibers may be subjected
to a cross-sectionally differential cross-linking, degrading or
grafting of monomeric compounds, preferably vinyl monomers, by
means of high-energy radiation. Preferably, the radiation is an
electron radiation. The radiation dose depends on the material. For
polyolefins it is at about 10.sup.7 rad, for polyesters at about
5.multidot.10.sup.7 rad. The dose depends also on the ultimate
objective. To form free radicals for grafting, a lower dose is
sufficient than would be sufficient for cross-linking.
Several of these effects may be combined, such as cross-linking
plus grafting or degrading plus grafting.
The differential limitation of the modifying action may for
instance be accomplished by limiting the radiation dose so as to
prevent complete penetration of the cross-section. In another
embodiment, the entire cross-section may be penetrated by the
radiation, but the action may be modified by heating and cooling
opposed faces of the foil or fibers. The penetration depth will
depend on the energy of the radiation.
The texturized fibers and sheet materials may for instance be in
the form of non-woven fabrics. These may be made from the fibers
obtained by splitting foils, without the aid of additional binding
agents, by applying a thermal treatment to the non-woven fabric so
as to heat the fibers to a point close to their softening point and
cause them to become bonded to each other at points of contact. The
heat employed in this step can at the same time be used to effect
the shrinking which causes the texturizing effect.
The temperature of the heat treatment should preferably be a few
degrees below the initial melting range of the material.
The grafting may be effected with acrylic acid or derivatives
thereof, such as the sodium salt of acrylic acid, and other
suitable monomers conventionally used for grafting operations. The
type of graft polymer obtained may affect also other properties,
such as the melting range, water adsorption, antistatic properties,
etc.
The following examples will further explain the invention.
Reference is made to the attached drawings.
EXAMPLE 1
This example illustrates the making of a texturized filament from
fibers obtained by splitting wherein the modification is obtained
by unilateral radiation of a polyethylene foil in a vacuum
chamber.
With particular reference to FIG. 1, it will be noted that
reference numeral 1 designates a foil of polyethylene which had
been subjected to a unidirectional stretching in the direction of
movement. The foil was passed through an air lock 2 into vacuum
chamber 5 with which the scanner 3 of an electron acclerator 4 was
associated. The foil was treated in the vacuum chamber by radiation
with the electron beam 6. The speed of movement of the foil and the
energy of the electron current produced by the electron accelerator
4 were adjusted so that the foil 1 absorbed radiation in a dose of
3.multidot.10.sup.7 rad. The energy of the electrons of the beam 6
was selected to provide for a maximum range of the electrons in the
polyethylene foil corresponding to exactly one half the thickness
of the foil. With a foil of a mass equal to 50 g/m.sup.2 an
electron energy of 50 KeV was applied. In this manner the
polyethylene foil was cross-linked only on the side facing the
scanner. After passing through a second air lock 7, the foil
entered a splitting device 8 wherein the individual fibers were
separated. In the device 9 filaments were spun from the individual
fibers which were then exposed to heat in the zone 10. This caused
a shrinking which affected the foil and fibers which had been
crosslinked by chemical radiation in a manner different from the
foil or fibers that had not been so treated. Thus, a texturizing of
the filament was obtained. The texturized filaments 11 were finally
collected on a spool 12.
EXAMPLE 2
This example illustrates the making of a texturized filament from
fibers obtained by foil splitting by means of radiation of one
major face of a polyethylene foil in a vacuum chamber and
subsequent unilateral grafting of the polyethylene with acrylic
acid.
With particular reference to FIG. 2, it will be noted that the
parts indicated by the same numbers as in FIG. 1 have the same
function. Accordingly, a polyethylene foil 1 which has been
subjected to unidirectional stretching in the direction of movement
was subjected to radiation in the same manner as described in
EXample 1. The radiation caused the formation of free radicals.
Before these free radicals disintegrated, the foil was passed into
a vessel 13 wherein it was subjected to graft copolymerization with
acrylic acid.
It will be understood that the radiation treatment could also be
applied subsequent to the grafting step. All other steps were the
same as in Example 1. The texturized filaments produced by this
process have the specific advantage that, because of the grafting
of the acrylic acid, they are amenable to easy dyeing in specific
areas. Thus, specific color effects can be obtained.
With an acrylic acid concentration in aqueous solution of 20
percent, a treatment time of 15 minutes and a temperature of
28.degree.C an increase of the mass was obtained indicating the
degree of grafting to be of 8.5 percent.
EXAMPLE 3
This example illustrates the making of a texturized filament from
fibers obtained by splitting of a foil, the process being
characterized in this example by homogeneous radiation of the
entire cross-section of a polyethylene foil and a differential
heating or cooling treatment of the two major faces of the foil
during or after radiation.
With specific reference to FIG. 3, it will again be noted that
parts having the same reference numerals as in FIG. 1 have the same
function. Accordingly, a polyethylene foil which had been subjected
to unidirectional stretching in the direction of movement as
indicated at 1 was passed under the scanner 3 of an electron
accelerator 4 and was radiated in the open air with electrons 6. No
air locks were used in this case. The speed of movement of the foil
and the energy of the beam produced by the electron accelerator
were adjusted so that the foil absorbed a dose of
2.multidot.10.sup.7 rad.
Contrary to the process of Examples 1 and 2, the electron energy in
this case was of a magnitude sufficient to cause a homogeneous
irradiation of the foil throughout its cross-section. Thus, with a
foil of a mass equal to 50 g/m.sup.2 an electron energy of 200 KeV
was applied. However, a differential modification of the
cross-section was obtained by exposing the foil, prior to, during
or after the irradiation to a cooling gas 14 at its underside and
to a heating gas 15 at its top face. Thus, the irradiation on the
side facing the scanner 3 resulted in a different structure than on
the opposite face. All other steps were the same as in Example
1.
All of the processes of the above Examples can also be carried out
with the same results using other textiles, such as polypropylene,
polyamide (Nylon 6), polyester or cellulosic foils.
Without further analysis, the foregoing will so fully reveal the
gist of the present invention that others can by applying current
knowledge readily adapt it for various applications without
omitting features that, from the standpoint of prior art, fairly
constitute essential characteristics of the generic or specific
aspects of this invention and, therefore, such adaptations should
and are intended to be comprehended within the meaning and range of
equivalence of the following claims.
* * * * *