U.S. patent number 3,782,470 [Application Number 05/283,122] was granted by the patent office on 1974-01-01 for thermal oil recovery technique.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Esso Production Research Company. Invention is credited to Walter L. Penberthy, Jr., Robert C. West.
United States Patent |
3,782,470 |
West , et al. |
January 1, 1974 |
THERMAL OIL RECOVERY TECHNIQUE
Abstract
A thermal method for recovering oil from a subterranean
formation. Steam is injected by means of a well into the formation
to heat the oil and to lower its viscosity. Following the steam
injection, a noncondensing gas which is substantially free of
oxidizing components is introduced into the steam injection system
and is then injected into the formation at the same location at
which the steam was injected. The temperature of the gas upon
introduction into the steam injection system is no higher than
substantially ambient temperature. After the gas has been injected
into the formation, the heated oil is withdrawn from the formation
by means of the well.
Inventors: |
West; Robert C. (Houston,
TX), Penberthy, Jr.; Walter L. (Houston, TX) |
Assignee: |
Esso Production Research
Company (Houston, TX)
|
Family
ID: |
23084622 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/283,122 |
Filed: |
August 23, 1972 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
59611 |
Jul 30, 1970 |
|
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
166/303 |
Current CPC
Class: |
E21B
43/24 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
E21B
43/24 (20060101); E21B 43/16 (20060101); E21b
043/24 () |
Field of
Search: |
;166/303,263,302 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Novosad; Stephen J.
Attorney, Agent or Firm: James A. Reilly et al.
Parent Case Text
REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
This application is a continuation-in-part of copending application
Ser. No. 59,611, filed July 30, 1970, and now abandoned.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A method for recovering oil from a subterranean oil-bearing
formation which comprises injecting steam through a steam injection
system, including a well, and into the formation to heat the oil
within the formation and lower its viscosity, then introducing into
the steam injection system a noncondensing gas which is
substantially free of oxidizing components and which has a
temperature which is no higher than substantially ambient
temperature upon said introduction, then injecting the
noncondensing and nonoxidizing gas into the formation at the
location of steam injection, and subsequently withdrawing oil from
the formation by means of the well.
2. A method as defined by claim 1 wherein the noncondensing and
nonoxidizing gas is natural gas containing a predominant amount of
methane.
3. A method as defined by claim 1 wherein the noncondensing and
nonoxidizing gas consists essentially of methane.
4. A method as defined by claim 1 wherein the noncondensing and
nonoxidizing gas is flue gas.
5. A method as defined by claim 1 wherein the noncondensing and
nonoxidizing gas is carbon dioxide.
6. A method as defined by claim 1 wherein the noncondensing and
nonoxidizing gas consists essentially of nitrogen.
7. A method as defined by claim 1 wherein the volume of steam
injected is from 5,000 to 250,000 barrels.
8. A method as defined by claim 7 wherein the volume of
noncondensing and nonoxidizing gas injected into the formation is
from 25 to 500 scf of gas per barrel of steam.
9. A method as defined by claim 1 wherein the steps of steam
injection and subsequent gas injection are conducted a plurality of
times prior to the withdrawal of oil from the formation.
10. A method as defined by claim 1 wherein the cycle of injecting
the steam, then injecting the gas and subsequently withdrawing oil
from the formation is conducted a plurality of times.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to the recovery of petroleum from a
subterranean formation utilizing a well for the injection of heated
fluids and the withdrawal of petroleum. More specifically, this
invention relates to a steam stimulation technique where the steam
is displaced into the formation by a noncondensing and nonoxidizing
gas. Subsequent to the injection of the steam and the gas, the well
is placed on production and the heated fluids including oil are
withdrawn from the formation.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Among the more promising methods that have been suggested or tried
for the recovery of oil from viscous oil reservoirs are those which
introduce thermal energy into the reservoirs. The thermal energy
may be in a variety of forms such as hot water, in-situ combustion,
steam, and the like. Each of these thermal energy agents may be
useful under certain conditions. However, steam is generally the
most efficient and economical and is clearly the most widely
employed thermal energy agent.
There are two basic processes which use steam as a thermal energy
agent for oil recovery. One of these is the steam-drive process in
which steam is injected into the formation at one well and
petroleum is driven through the reservoir by the steam to an offset
producing well. The other is a steam stimulation technique,
commonly referred to as the " huff-and-puff" process, in which
steam is injected by means of a well into the formation and,
subsequently, the heated oil is withdrawn from the formation by
means of the same well. The "huff-and-puff" process is conducted in
cycles; alternately, steam is injected into the well and oil is
withdrawn through the same well. These cycles are repeated until
oil can no longer be economically recovered.
The "huff-and-puff" process has particular applicability in
reservoirs where it is difficult to establish fluid communication
between two wells. This inability to establish communication may be
a result of formation discontinuities such as impermeable streaks,
faulting, and the like which would render steam drives inoperable.
The "huff-and-puff" technique is also generally superior in
formations having high viscosity crude which is not easily
displaced by a steam drive and in virgin oil reservoirs having a
high oil saturation and a relatively low water saturation.
One difficulty that has been observed with the "huff-and-puff"
process is the decline in oil production and increase in water-oil
ratio as the cycles of the process are repeated. Initially, the oil
saturation in the formation is relatively high and the water
saturation is relatively low. However, as the well is repeatedly
produced by the "huff-and-puff" cycles, the area in the immediate
vicinity of the wellbore will contain less and less oil. Moreover,
since all of the water which is introduced into the formation as
steam during the injection phase of the cycle is generally not
recovered during the production phase, the water saturation around
the well begins to rise as the cycles are repeated.
As a net result, less oil and more water is produced from the well
during the depletion of the formation.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In the injection phase of a "huff-and-puff" steam stimulation
process, steam is injected into the oil-bearing reservoir and
followed by a noncondensing and nonoxidizing gas which has a
temperature which is no higher than substantially ambient
temperature upon introduction into the steam injection system.
During the production phase, oil, gas, and other fluids are
withdrawn from the formation. The noncondensing and nonoxidizing
gas improves the oil production rates and reduces the water-oil
ratio of the well.
This invention is suitable for use in any oil-bearing reservoir
which is capable of being produced by conventional steam recovery
techniques. However, this invention has particular applicability in
"tar sand" oil reservoirs. These tar sands generally have a
relatively low temperature, 50.degree. - 125.degree.F, and the oil
contained within these sands has an extremely high viscosity,
100,000 centipoises or higher, at such temperatures. When the
temperature of the oil is raised by several hundred degrees,
however, the viscosity of the oil may be reduced to 10 centipoises
or less. Quite naturally, such a reduction in viscosity will
increase the ability of the oil to flow within and to be produced
from such "tar sand" reservoirs.
The objects of this invention can be perhaps most easily seen with
reference to the following drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
The FIGURE is a schematic drawing of a section of the earth showing
a well penetrating an oil-bearing formation.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Referring to the drawing, an oil-bearing formation 10 is penetrated
by a well shown generally at 11 which has been drilled from the
surface of the earth 12. The well has been completed in a
conventional manner with a string of casing 13 set within the
borehole 14 and supported by a cement sheath 15.
The well contains a string of tubing 16, and a packer assembly 17
seals the upper portion of the tubing-casing annular space.
Perforations 18 establish fluid communication between the formation
and the well 11. It will be understood by those skilled in the art
that the foregoing represents a conventional well completion which
could be used in the practice of this invention. Other well-known
well completion systems would be equally suitable for use in this
invention.
In the practice of this invention, the "huff-and-puff" stimulation
cycle is employed. In such a stimulation sequence, thermal energy
is introduced into the formation by injecting steam down the tubing
string 16 and into the formation 10 through perforations 18. After
the steam has been injected into the formation, the well is
generally shut in to permit the formation to "heat soak." During
this heat-soaking period, thermal energy is transferred from the
steam to the formation and formation fluids. The length of the
heat-soak period will vary in duration depending primarily on the
thermodynamics of the fluid and rock system. The period will
normally be a rather short time of several days to weeks but may be
as long as several months. After the heat-soak period has been
completed, the pressure on the well is reduced, and the heated
reservoir fluids flow through the formation 10 and up the tubing
string 16 to suitable separation and storage facilities (not
shown).
It has now been found that the oil recovery efficiency of such a
"huff-and-puff" steam stimulation process can be radically improved
by injecting a nonoxidizing and noncondensing gas into the
formation subsequent to the steam injection and prior to production
of the formation fluids. In this process, a volume of steam is
first injected into the formation as previously described. The
steam is then followed by a nonoxidizing and noncondensing gas such
as methane or natural gas, which is injected into the formation
through the perforations 18. The well is then shut in for a
suitable heat-soak period. Subsequently, the well is placed on
production, and the formation fluids including heated oil are
withdrawn by means of the well.
Experience has shown that the conventional "huff-and-puff" process
has declining efficiency during the production history. That is, as
the cycles are repeated the oil production rate declines, the
quantity of oil recovered per barrel of steam injected declines,
and the quantity of water produced per barrel of oil recovered
increases. This declining efficiency is clearly shown in the
following Table I. This Table shows the results of three cycles of
a "huff-and-puff" steam stimulation process in a well completed in
a manner similar to that previously described. ##SPC1##
As can be seen from Table I as the "huff-and-puff" cycles are
repeated, the oil production rate drops from an initial average of
84 to 59 barrels per day. The quantity of oil produced per barrel
of steam injected decreases from 0.62 to 0.10 barrels of oil per
barrel of steam (steam quantities herein are expressed as the
volume occupied at 60.degree.F by a corresponding weight of water).
Concurrently, the water-oil ratio rises from an initial rate of 1.0
to 4.65 barrels of water per barrel of oil.
Table II, Cycle 4, shows the results of the practice of this
invention. Following the cycles shown in Table I, a bank of steam
was injected into the well. The steam was immediately followed and
displaced by a volume of natural gas. The well was shut in for a
suitable heat-soak period and then placed on production. The
results of this fourth cycle are shown in Table II, and for
comparative purposes the results of the preceding Cycle 3 are
repeated in this Table. ##SPC2##
As can be seen from Table II, the recovery efficiency is radically
improved by the injection of the nonoxidizing and noncondensing
natural gas during the fourth "huff-and-puff" stimulation cycle.
The oil production rate increases from 59.0 to 73.0 barrels per
day. The quantity of oil produced per barrel of steam injected
increases more than ten-fold from 0.10 to 1.15. The water-oil ratio
is reduced by almost one-half from 4.65 to 2.75.
A truly surprising aspect of this invention is the ability of this
noncondensing gas to increase the oil recovery efficiency of the
process. It is well known to those skilled in the art that the
presence of a gas phase in a porous media will reduce the
permeability of the porous media to liquids. In other words, it is
generally conceded that the greater the quantity of undissolved gas
in an oil-containing formation, the lower the oil producing rate
from that formation will be. However, this invention shows
precisely the opposite effect. The injection of the noncondensing
natural gas actually increases the oil production. The oil
producing rate increases by almost 25 percent; the total quantity
of oil produced is more than doubled.
The gas employed in the practice of this invention should be
non-oxidizing and noncondensing. Suitable gases which will meet
these requirements are flue gas, nitrogen, carbon dioxide, methane,
and natural gas containing predominant portions of methane. The gas
should not be air or other gases containing substantial quantities
of oxygen. Such combustion-sustaining gases are likely to initiate
combustion within the formation, and the products of combustion
tend to form emulsion-stabilizing substances. As a consequence,
these combustion-sustaining gases tend to create emulsions of oil
and water which are extremely difficult to treat and handle at the
surface storage facilities. Moreover, the gas should be
noncondensing. That is, it should remain in a substantially
nonliquid or gaseous state during the process. Where a
multi-component gas is employed such as natural gas, certain
components of the gas, such as high molecular weight hydrocarbons,
may have a tendency to condense as the formation cools following
steam injection. Condensation of minor amounts of the gas will not
interfere with the practice of this invention so long as the major
proportion remains gaseous.
The gas should have a low concentration, if any, of intermediate
molecular weight hydrocarbons--propane and heavier. Such
intermediate weight hydrocarbons in significant quantities (more
than 50 percent by weight in the injected gas stream) are
disadvantageous in the practice of this invention. These higher
molecular weight hydrocarbons have the tendency to precipitate
asphaltic components from the crude with a resultant reduction in
the permeability of the formation. Moreover, the higher molecular
weight hydrocarbons such as natural gasolines have a high
solubility or even miscibility with most crude oils. High
concentrations of these materials in the injected gas would have
the tendency to miscibly displace crude oil from the immediate
vicinity of the wellbore. This would reduce the oil saturation at a
location in the formation where high oil saturations are desired,
and there would be a consequent reduction in permeability to oil at
the well-bore. It should be understood that minor quantities of
intermediate molecular weight hydrocarbons (propane, butane and
higher) can be tolerated in the gas stream and are, in fact,
naturally-occurring constituents of most natural gases. These
substances can be tolerated so long as they do not form a
predominant portion of the gas employed in the practice of this
invention.
The mechanism by which the noncondensing and nonoxidizing gas
improves the steam stimulation technique is not completely
understood. It is clear, however, that it is not the function of
the gas to heat the formation. The gas is at substantially ambient
temperature or less when it enters the steam injection system. The
term ambient temperature is used herein in its ordinary sense and
refers to the average temperature of the ground or air surrounding
the gas flow line prior to its interconnection with the steam
injection system. The steam injection system in this context refers
to any portion of the flow line and well system which is heated to
a significant degree by the steam during the steam injection phase.
The steam injection system would include, for example, the well
itself, any surface flow line which might lead from an injection
header to the well and the injection header if both the gas and the
steampass through such a header.
It is recognized that some minor and incidental heating of the gas
might occur where the gas flow line is exposed to sunlight or
through compression of the gas. However, such heating would be
insignificant and the gas would enter the steam injection system at
substantially (no more than 40.degree.F higher than) ambient
temperature or less. Even where flue gas is employed, it is at
substantially ambient temperature or less when it enters the steam
injection system. Flue gas is the combustion product from
compressors and steam generators which must be treated to remove
water and corrosive components prior to injection. This treating of
the flue gas, of course, reduces its temperature. More importantly,
however, the temperature of the flue gas must be radically reduced
prior to compression. The horsepower required to compress a gas is
related to its absolute temperature. Thus, it is generally
desirable, if not essential, to cool the flue gas prior to
compression, and in the practice of this invention the flue gas
enters the steam injection system at substantially ambient
temperature.
The steam employed in the practice of this invention may be
saturated or superheated. Gnerally speaking, however, in most field
applications the steam will be saturated with a quality of
approximately 65 to 90 percent and a temperature of
300.degree.-650.degree.F. The quantity of steam injected per cycle
will vary depending on the conditions existing at a given
application. Among the factors which will control the volume of
steam injected will be the thickness of the oil-bearing formation,
the viscosity of the oil, and porosity of the formation, the
saturation of oil and water in the formation, and the state of
depletion of oil from the formation. Generally speaking, however,
the steam volume will vary between 5,000 and 250,000 barrels per
cycle. The quantity of gas employed per cycle in the practice of
this invention is also variable and will depend upon the cost of
the gas as well as the formation and fluid properties previously
described. In most applications, the gas quantity will vary between
25 to 500 scf of gas per barrel of steam. Generally, a gas-steam
ratio of approximately 100 scf per barrel will be satisfactory.
In the preferred embodiment of this invention, single slugs of
steam and the noncondensing and nonoxidizing gas are introduced
into the formation during the injection phase of the
"huff-and-puff" cycle. It should be understood, however, that it is
contemplated that the steam and gas may be introduced in multiple,
alternate small volume slugs. In such an embodiment, the total
volume of steam and gas employed per cycle will lie within the
limits previously stated and, as in the preferred embodiment, the
first fluid injected will be steam.
The principle of the invention and the best mode in which it is
contemplated to apply that principle have been described. It is to
be understood that the foregoing is illustrative only and that
other means and techniques can be employed without departing from
the true scope of the invention defined in the following
claims.
* * * * *