U.S. patent number 3,780,872 [Application Number 05/076,633] was granted by the patent office on 1973-12-25 for filters comprising anisometric compressed and bonded multilayer knitted wire mesh composites.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Pall Corporation. Invention is credited to David B. Pall.
United States Patent |
3,780,872 |
Pall |
December 25, 1973 |
**Please see images for:
( Certificate of Correction ) ** |
FILTERS COMPRISING ANISOMETRIC COMPRESSED AND BONDED MULTILAYER
KNITTED WIRE MESH COMPOSITES
Abstract
Filters and filter units are provided which comprise as the
filter sheet anisometric compressed and bonded knitted wire mesh
composites composed of a plurality of sheets of knitted wire mesh,
superimposed at random orientation with respect to each other,
compressed or densified to a voids volume within the range from
about 10 to about 90 percent, and bonded together. The sheets are
taken in sufficient number, usually at least five and preferably
ten or more, and as much as 1,000 or more, to form a
self-supporting relatively non-resilient composite of high tensile
strength and high breaking strength having an average pore diameter
of less than 200 microns, and preferably less than 100 microns,
that is relatively uniform in any unit area of the surface, and
having an anisometric porosity, the through pores extending
crosswise of the sheet greatly exceeding in number the through
pores extending laterally of the sheet, which latter pores can be
reduced virtually to zero in a highly compressed composite. The
composite is formed by superimposing a plurality of knitted wire
mesh sheets, annealing the composite to avoid wire breakage during
later processing, compressing the composite to the desired density
and anisometricity by application of pressure in a direction
approximately perpendicular to the plane of the layers of the
composite, and bonding the sheet layers and wire filaments of the
sheets together at their points of contact and/or crossing. The
bonding holds the composite at the selected density, prevents
relative movement of the wires in the composite, and in conjunction
with the multilayer structure imparts the self-supporting
nonresilient characteristic, together with high tensile strength
and high breaking strength.
Inventors: |
Pall; David B. (Roslyn Estates,
NY) |
Assignee: |
Pall Corporation (Glen Cove,
NY)
|
Family
ID: |
26758309 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/076,633 |
Filed: |
September 29, 1970 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
732443 |
May 27, 1968 |
3690606 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
210/493.1;
55/498; 55/525; 210/510.1 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B07B
1/4663 (20130101); F16L 55/0336 (20130101); B01D
39/12 (20130101); B07B 1/4672 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
B01D
39/10 (20060101); B01D 39/12 (20060101); F16L
55/033 (20060101); F16L 55/02 (20060101); B07B
1/46 (20060101); B01d 027/06 () |
Field of
Search: |
;210/493,499,510 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Zaharna; Samih N.
Assistant Examiner: Calvetti; F. F.
Parent Case Text
This application is a division of Ser. No. 732,443, filed May 27,
1968, now U.S. Pat. No. 3,690,606, patented Sept. 12, 1972.
Claims
I claim:
1. A filter element comprising, in combination, a porous
fluid-permeable anisometric knitted wire mesh composite of
integrated multilayer structure capable of removing small particles
from fluids comprising a plurality of layers of knitted wire mesh,
compressed substantially throughout its surface area to a maximum
pore diameter below about 200 microns, and having the wires lying
almost entirely in planes approximately parallel to the plane of
the composite, having an anisometric porosity, and a voids volume
of at least 10 percent, the wires at the interface of the interior
layers being intermingled and interlocked with each other
substantially throughout by such compression, and the wires and the
layers being bonded together at their points of contact, formed in
a cylinder having two open ends and an end cap closing off each of
the open ends.
2. A filter element as in claim 1 having an anisometric metallic
filter sheet material whose thickness is within the range from
about 0.001 to about 0.5 inch.
3. A filter element in claim 1, wherein the wires within each layer
and at the interface of the layers of the filter sheet material are
sinterbonded together.
4. A filter element as in claim 1, wherein said layers of the
filter sheet material are of weft-type knitted mesh.
5. A filter element as in claim 1, wherein said layers of the
filter sheet material are of warp-type knitted mesh.
6. A filter element as in claim 1, wherein the layers are of
knitted mesh having less than thirty needle ends per inch.
7. A filter element as in claim 1, made of stainless steel
wire.
8. A filter element as in claim 1, in which there are at least five
layers of knitted wire mesh in one composite.
9. A filter element as in claim 1, wherein the wires of the filter
sheet material are deformed at their points of crossing, so as to
have a lesser height and a greater width at those points.
10. A filter element as in claim 1, having the wires of the filter
sheet material sinter-bonded at their points of crossing.
11. A corrugated filter element comprising a porous fluid-permeable
anisometric knitted wire mesh composite of integrated multilayer
structure capable of removing small particles from fluids
comprising a plurality of layers of knitted wire mesh, compressed
substantially throughout its surface area to a maximum pore
diameter below about 200 microns, and having the wires lying almost
entirely in planes approximately parallel to the plane of the
composite, having an anisometric porosity and a voids volume of at
least 10 percent, the wires at the interface of the interior layers
being intermingled and interlocked with each other substantially
throughout by such compression, and the wires and the layers being
bonded together at their points of contact, in corrugated form.
12. A filter unit comprising, in combination, a housing, a fluid
inlet and a fluid outlet therein, and, disposed across the line of
flow between the inlet and the outlet in a manner to intercept
fluid flowing therebetween, a porous fluid-permeable anisometric
knitted wire mesh composite of integrated multilayer structure
capable of removing samll particles from fluids comprising a
plurality of layers of knitted wire mesh, compressed substantially
throughout its surface area to a maximum pore diameter below about
200 microns, and having the wires lying almost entirely in planes
approximately parallel to the plane of the composite, having an
anisometric porosity and a voids volume of at least 10 percent, the
wires at the interface of the interior layers being intermingled
and interlocked with each other substantially throughout by such
compression, and the wires and the layers being bonded together at
their points of contact.
13. A filter unit in accordance with claim 12, wherein the wires of
the metallic filter sheet are sinter-bonded at their points of
contact.
14. A filter element as in claim 12 having an anisometric metallic
filter sheet material whose thickness is within the range from
about 0.001 to about 0.5 inch.
15. A filter element as in claim 12, wherein the wires within each
layer and at the interface of the layers of the filter sheet
material are sinter-bonded together.
16. A filter element as in claim 12, wherein said layers of the
filter sheet material are of weft-type knitted mesh.
17. A filter element as in claim 12, wherein said layers of the
filter sheet material are of warp-type knitted mesh.
18. A filter element as in claim 12, wherein the layers are of
knitted mesh having less than thirty needle ends per inch.
19. A filter element as in claim 12, made of stainless steel
wire.
20. A filter element as in claim 12, in which there are at least
five layers of knitted wire mesh in one composite.
21. A filter element as in claim 12, wherein the wires of the
filter sheet material are deformed at their points of crossing, so
as to have a lesser height and a greater width at those points.
Description
Woven wire mesh have been in use for some years as filter
materials. They have the advantages of being readily available,
permitting close control of uniformity in the number, size and
shape of the pores, and in tensile strength, as well as being
adapted for fabrication and being relatively low in cost. Various
forms of such materials have been provided, ranging from the woven
wire mesh as commercially available, to wire mesh specially treated
so as to better suit them for filter uses.
U.S. Pat. No. 2,423,547 to Behlen, dated July 8, 1947, suggests
rolling a wire mesh to form a flat sheet, and thereby produce a
filter or screen material having a reasonably smooth surface,
analogous to a perforated sheet material prepared by drilling holes
in a metallic sheet in the desired pattern. However, such screens
have the disadvantage that the dirt capacity is very greatly
reduced, as compared to the woven wire mesh starting material.
The amount of dirt that can be taken up by a filter before it is
effectively clogged is referred to as the dirt capacity of the
filter, and this can be measured in various ways. For reference
purposes, it is usually expressed in terms of grams of standardized
dirt per unit surface area of the filter, as determined by a
standardized test procedure.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,925,650 and 3,049,796 to Pall describe and claim
woven wire sheet material specially treated by sinter-bonding, with
a slight or great deformation of the wires at their points of
crossing, which possess several advantages over the Behlen
material. Not only are the wires held against a relative shift in
position during treatment, because of the sintering operation, but
the material also retains much of the nature of the starting wire
mesh, and therefore much if not all of the original dirt
capacity.
Nonetheless, one of the difficulties in using woven wire mesh-type
filters is their relatively low dirt capacity, as compared to other
filter materials.
Filter media can generally be classified as being one of two types,
depth filters and surface filters. A depth filter removes suspended
material from the fluid passed through the filter by collecting it
not only on the surface of the element but also within the pores. A
depth filter has a considerable thickness, and has a plurality of
pores of distinct length. The longer the pores, the higher the dirt
capacity of the filter, because there is more room for dirt along
the pores. Most depth filters are made of masses of fibers, or
other particulate material, held together by mechanical means or by
bonding. One or several layers of such materials can be employed,
and these layers can vary in porosity. In most cases, however, the
greater percentage of contaminants unable to pass through the
filter is trapped at the surface of the filter.
A surface filter removes suspended material from the fluid passed
through the filter by collecting such material on its surface, and
the material thus removed forms a filter cake or bed upon the
filter. This material naturally obstructs the openings in the
surface of the filter, because the fluid must flow through this
material, which thus effectively reduces the diameter of the filter
openings to the size of the pores in the filter cake. This
reduction in effective diameter of pore openings in the filter
increases the pressure differential required to maintain flow
through the filter.
Woven wire mesh filters of the square weave type fall in the
category of surface filters, because the depth of the pores through
the sheet is substantially no greater than the diameter of the
filaments making up the weave. Consequently, these filters have a
rather limited dirt capacity, as compared to depth filters. U.S.
Pat. No. 3,327,866 to Pall et al. describes woven wire mesh which,
by an appropriate selection of wire size and wire count, in both
warp and shute, is formulated to specified pore size Dutch twill
weaves of extraordinarily high dirt capacity, as compared to Dutch
twill weave wire mesh woven of wires of other sizes and/or
counts.
Knitted wire mesh filter elements have been known for many years.
However, the physical properties of knitted mesh made of fine
diameter wires are such as to defy any modification previously
attempted to render them suitable as filters for anything other
than coarse filtration of liquids and gases, such as air, since
they have lacked a reliable pore size uniformity and their maximum
pore size has been rather high, well in excess of 200 microns.
A number of U.S. Pats. have described air filters made in whole or
in part of knitted wire mesh, among them, No. 1,676,191 to Jordahl,
No. 1,905,160 to De Angelis, No. 1,829,401 to Kamrath, No.
2,274,684 to Goodloe, No. 2,327,184 to Goodloe, No. 2,334,263 to
Hartwell, No. 2,439,424 to Goodloe et al., No. 2,462,316 to
Goodloe, No. 2,672,214 to Goodloe, No. 2,792,075 to McBride et al.,
No. 2,929,464 to Sprouse, and No. 3,085,381 to Sobeck. Virtually
all of the filter elements thus proposed comprise a plurality of
layers of knitted wire mesh. However, the problem presented by
knitted mesh is best summarized by Goodloe in No. 2,327,184:
"Although it is highly desirable from the standpoint of efficiency
to employ layers of fine mesh, such fine mesh, especially when of
knitted character, is generally of flimsy character, is not
self-sustaining, and consequently a filter body composed of layers
thereof is easily subject to compression by the force of the air or
gas stream moving therethrough, whereby tendency to crowd the
layers together is increased, so that the undesirable conditions
above referred to are further enhanced."
Goodloe and the other workers in the field have resolved these
problems as best they could, using reinforcing spacers (as in U.S.
Pat. No. No. 2,327,184), by crushing or compacting the plural
layers endwise or crosswise (as in U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,439,424,
2,462,316 and 2,672,214) or by supporting them within a filter unit
frame (as in U.S. Pat. Nos. 1,676,191, 1,829,401, 2,792,075,
2,929,464 and 3,085,381). Such expedients are acceptable for gas
filters, but they are not capable of overcoming the flimsy,
nonself-supporting nature of knitted wire mesh to render them
suitable for liquid filtration, where the fluid pressures are
considerably higher, and where high strength combined with low or
minimal flow resistance are indispensable prerequisites.
One of the outstanding characteristics of a knitted material, as
opposed to a woven material, is its resiliency or low modulus of
elasticity (Young's Modulus). A knitted wire mesh can be stretched
over 100 percent in any direction, despite the nonresiliency of the
wire filaments of which it is made up. In an air filter, this
inherent resiliency (which is due to the looping of the filaments
in the knit weave) is an advantage, as Jordahl pointed out in U.S.
Pat. No. 1,670,191, and it also makes it possible to fold and crush
the material in any direction, as in U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,439,424 and
2,462,316. In a liquid filter, however, this resiliency is a
disadvantage, since it means, in effect, that pore size varies with
pressure drop across the filter, the pores of the material closing
as the pressure drop increases.
It is equally evident that if the filaments be locked in position,
by bonding or other means, the resiliency is not diminished
appreciably, because the looped condition of the filaments is
unaffected by the bonding. Indeed, Jordahl pointed out that even
when a plurality of layers of knitted mesh are superimposed, and
compressed to any desired density, a relatively great density "may
be obtained without danger of losing the characteristic indicia of
the structure above described, since the uneven or irregularly
roughed surfaces of the fabric, due to the multiplicity of
interlocked strand loops distributed thereover, will always tend to
produce sufficient separation of the component folds, sheets or
layers as to assure the requisite low air pressure resistance of
the structure." It was because of this that Goodloe in U.S. Pat.
No. 2,274,684 used comparatively stiff wire, "whereby the
interengaged loops forming the fabric tend to resist relative
displacement and consequently tend to retain and maintain the
initial shapes and uniform distribution of the loop defined
openings throughout the area of the fabric, as well as a
considerable degree of self-supporting stability due to inherently
greater resistance to both contraction and elongative stretch of
the fabric;". Because of these difficulties, which are not found in
woven wire mesh, and because knitted wire mesh presents no apparent
advantage over woven wire mesh, whether in one or in several
layers, knitted wire mesh has not been preferred to woven wire mesh
in liquid filters.
In accordance with the invention, knitted wire mesh is formed into
a self-supporting relatively rigid anisometric multilayer structure
that is not only eminently suited for use in liquid filtration, as
well as other uses, such as in gas filtration, but also has
unexpected and advantageous properties as compared to similar
materials made of woven mesh. The knitted mesh material of the
invention has lower flow resistance than comparable woven mesh
material of the same pore size, and it is also stronger, is more
uniform in permeability, has a higher modulus of elasticity
(Young's Modulus), usually at least 3.3% of the modulus of solid
sheet of the same material, and frequently much higher, and when
materials of equal particle removal are compared, has a higher dirt
capacity. For stainless steel this value is at least 1 .times.
10.sup.6 psi. Why this is so is not at present understood, and no
explanation thereof can be offered, but the superiority is clearly
to be seen in the data that has been collected, of which a
representative selection is given in the examples.
The knitted wire mesh used as the filter sheet in the filter
elements and filter units of the invention comprises a plurality of
sheets of knitted wire mesh, superimposed at random orientation
with respect to each other, compressed or densified to a voids
volume within the range from about 10 to about 90 percent, and
bonded together. The sheets are taken in sufficient number, usually
at least five and preferably ten or more, and as many as 50 to
1,000 or more, to form a self-supporting relatively nonresilient
anisometric composite sheet of high tensile strength, high specific
strength and a high modulus of elasticity, having an average pore
diameter of less than 200 microns, and preferably less than 100
microns, that is relatively uniform in any unit area surface of the
sheet. The porosity of the composite is anisometric, the number of
through pores extending across the sheet exceeding the number of
through pores extending laterally of the sheet. The number of
lateral through pores can be reduced virtually to zero, if the
degree of compression or densification is great enough, and this
can be an advantage in many uses. The thickness need not be great,
provided the sheet is self-supporting, and preferably is within the
range from about 0.001 to about 0.5 inch.
The composite is formed, by superimposing a plurality of knitted
wire mesh sheets, preferably (but optionally) annealing the
composite to avoid wire breakage during later processing,
compressing the composite to the desired density by application of
pressure in a direction approximately perpendicular to the plane of
the layers of the composite, and bonding the sheet layers and the
wire filaments of the sheets together at their points of contact
and/or crossing.
The annealing softens the wires which are work hardened as a result
of the knitting operation, and permits them to bend or deform
during compression without breaking. While it is preferable to
anneal the composite to reduce annealing cost, annealing of the
knit mesh sheets before they are superimposed into a composite is
an equivalent step, serving the same purpose.
If the composition of the wire is such that very little work
hardening occurs during knitting, the annealing step may be
omitted.
The bonding holds the composite at the selected density, prevents
relative movement of the wires in the composite, and in conjunction
with the multilayer structure imparts the high modulus of
elasticity, usually at least 1.1 .times. 10.sup.6 psi., together
with high tensile strength and high specific strength.
In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the filaments of the
knitted wire mesh are sintered to integrate them, at the bonding
stage of the process. The filaments can be integrated by sintering
prior to compressing, so that they no longer are able to shift
their relative positions. The sintering process also anneals the
filaments. However, since in the stack of knitted mesh sheets the
wires are sufficiently stable against relative movement during
compressing, being held in position by the interlocked loops of
wires of adjacent sheets, they may be compressed, preferably by
rolling, before sintering.
The rolling and sintering can be repeated as many times as desired
to meet any desired porosity and density requirement. In certain
cases, the effect of a rolling operation can be imparted to the
work by the application of pressure during sintering.
This method makes it practical to prepare composite sheet products
from knitted mesh sheets formed of very fine wires, appreciably
finer than 10 mils in diameter. In fact, wires 2 to 4 mils and
smaller in diameter can be utilized to provide strong
self-supporting relatively nonresilient anisometric knitted very
thin multilayer composite sheet products having a relatively large
number of pores in a uniform pattern, and a uniform porosity across
but not laterally of the sheet.
The anisometric knitted wire mesh composites are also susceptible
of being made with a relatively low voids volume, using knitted
mesh of relatively large wires and small pores, and a relatively
high thickness, so that they are especially suited for use in
transpiration cooling, when they can serve as porous walls or wall
liners for passage of cooling gases to efficiently remove heat from
the chamber walls, as in jet engine combustion chambers, rocket
engine fuel injection systems, turbo-jet blades, and the surface
skin of hypersonic aircraft, reentry and aerospace craft, and other
space vehicles and projectiles.
By use of the knitted mesh composites, it is possible to make
porous sheets from wire materials which cannot be woven into
suitable wire mesh. If a wire mesh is not to be too sleazy (i.e.,
if the wires are not to be free to slide around), the wires must be
elongated and deformed to small radius during weaving. The most
common woven meshes (e.g. 325 .times. 325 .times. 0.0014, 200
.times. 200 .times. 0.0021) require wire with an elongation of at
least 25 percent, and very few weaves can be made from wires having
elongations of less than 15 percent. By contrast, wire materials
with very low elongations can be knitted, and then used to make the
composites of the invention.
Several knitted wire mesh composites, and filter elements
containing the same, all in accordance with the invention, are
described in detail below, having reference to the embodiments
shown in the accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 is a plan view of a rigid warp-knitted mesh composite,
showing in two parts the starting mesh and the composite,
respectively;
FIG. 2 is a view in transverse section taken along the line 2--2 of
FIG. 1, and looking in the direction of the arrows;
FIG. 3 is a photographic top view enlarged six times of a
loose-weft-knitted mesh stack, ready for compressing and bonding to
form a composite of the invention;
FIG. 3A is a photographic top view enlarged six times of a
weft-knitted mesh composite of the invention, made from the mesh
stack of FIG. 3.
FIG. 3B is a photographic end view of the composite of FIG. 3A;
FIG. 4A is a photographic top view enlarged six times of another
knitted mesh composite of the invention;
FIG. 4B is a photographic end view of the composite of FIG. 4;
FIG. 5 is a plan view (with the top layer partly broken away) of a
tubular loose-weft-knitted mesh composite made of mesh of different
needle ends, showing the starting mesh in one part and the
composite in another part;
FIG. 6 is a view in transverse section, taken on the line 6--6 of
FIG. 5, looking in the direction of the arrows;
FIG. 7 is a plan view of a flat close-weft-knitted mesh composite,
showing the starting mesh in one part and the composite in another
part;
FIG. 8 represents a longitudinal sectional view of a filter unit
and filter element incorporating a knitted mesh composite of FIG.
1;
FIG. 9 represents a cross-section taken along the lines 9--9 of
FIG. 8.
A knitted mesh is composed of rows of loops, each caught into the
previous row, and depending for its support on both the row above
and the row below. There are two types of knitting, weft and warp.
In weft-knit mesh the loops run crosswise of the fabric, and each
loop is linked into the loop on the preceding row. In warp-knit
mesh, parallel yarns are united in a chain stitch, first one yarn
and then the other zig-zagging to tie the yarns together; and the
loops interlock both weftwise and warpwise in the fabric.
Warp-knitted mesh has about four times as many stitches to the inch
as weft-knit mesh, and is of a stronger and closer
construction.
When knitted mesh layers are superimposed, at random, the pores of
adjacent mesh layers do not necessarily line up, because the mesh
have an uneven surface, with projecting loops, resulting in
relative displacement of adjacent mesh layers. Upon compression of
the composite in a direction perpendicular to the plane of the
mesh, this displacement may be increased. Thus, because of the
random orientation of the mesh layers of the composite, the through
pores follow an extremely tortuous path. At the same time, the
anisometric characteristic is impressed on the sheet, because of
the relative lateral displacement of the fibers of adjacent mesh
layers, to selectively block laterally extending through pores.
This relative displacement is consequently an advantage, since it
has the effect of reducing the size of the through pores in the
composite. Loops of adjacent mesh layers project into and partially
obstruct the pores of the next adjacent layers, and upon
compression this effect can be repeated many times, with loop wires
from layers as far as three or four layers away joining in this
obstruction. Thus, in a composite of five to ten layers, through
crosswise pores can be reduced to as low as an average of 50
microns or less, using mesh having an initial 500 to 10,000 micron
pore size.
At the same time, these projecting loops selectively block the
laterally-extending through pores to a greater extent than the
cross-wise pores, and this effect is increased as the number of
layers and the degree of compression or densification is
increased.
The result is an accentuation of the anisometricity of the starting
knitted mesh, to the point where the through pores that extend
laterally can be blocked together, and thereby extinguished.
The tortuousness of the through pores in these composites is in
contrast to the pores through a woven wire mesh, such as a square
weave mesh, which are of the straight-through variety, or of a
Dutch twill weave material, which are angled.
The knitted wire mesh composites can be made up of warp-knitted or
weft-knitted wire mesh in any combination of mesh, wires, pore
sizes, and knit types and stitches, such as plain stitch or purl
stitch, flat stitch or rib stitch, open work stitch or tuck stitch,
weft-knit mesh; and single-bar tricot, double bar tricot and
Milanese warp-knit mesh. Flat knit and circular knit mesh can be
used. Circular knit mesh can be cut open, or used double.
The knitted mesh composites can be knitted of wires of any metal.
For filter uses, metals which are inert to and non-corroded by the
fluid being filtered or the gas in contact therewith are of course
preferred. Stainless steel is a very suitable material. Aluminum,
brass and bronze wires can also be used. Other wires that are
useful include copper, iron, steel, Monel metal, molybdenum,
tantalum, colombium, titanium, tungsten, nickel-chromium alloys,
cobalt-based alloys, chromium-plated wires of all types,
zinc-plated wires of all types, and cadmium-plated wires of all
types. All of these wires give knitted mesh composites of high
modulus of elasticity, usually at least 3.3 percent of the modulus
of solid sheet of the same material, because of the construction of
the composite.
These can be knitted using conventional textile knitting machinery
to mesh of the required needle ends, or loops per inch, wire
diameters, and pore sizes. In general, the mesh should not have
more than about 30 needle ends per inch, but there is no lower
limit. If the knitted mesh is rather open, i.e., if the needle ends
are only 2 per inch, or less, more layers may be needed to reduce
pore size to the desired maximum than if closer knitted mesh is
used, but if large initial thickness of the composite is not a
factor, this is not a disadvantage.
The wires are usually monofilaments. Wires less than 10 mils in
diameter, and preferably from 1 to 5 mils in diameter, are
preferred for filter uses. The wires can be of any cross-sectional
configuration, such as round, square, flat, polygonal, elliptical
and rectangular. Stranded multifilament wire can be used.
It is sometimes advantageous for some filter uses to use magnetic
wires, or to interleave mesh of magnetic wires with mesh of
non-magnetic wires, in the mesh composites. In some cases, it may
be useful to alternate mesh of magnetic wires with mesh of
non-magnetic wires.
The composite is prepared by superimposing a selected number of
knitted wire mesh sheets, one above the other. The orientation is
random, preferably, since this best enables each sheet to remedy
any nonuniformity in the next sheet, and produce a composite that
is uniform throughout, but an orderly or a patterned orientation,
such as laying alternate sheets at right angles, or other specific
orientation, to the one below may have advantages in some
instances.
If the knitted wire mesh have not previously been annealed, the
composite is preferably annealed first, to soften the wire
filaments. This is especially desirable when the wire filaments are
4 mils or less in diameter. Annealing is at a temperature and for a
time appropriate for the metal of which the filaments are made, and
is usually at from about 150.degree. to about 1,125.degree.C. for
from 10 minutes to 48 hours. The following are exemplary:
Temperature Time Metal (.degree.C.) (Minutes) Stainless steel
1000-1125 10-30 Copper 260-650 10-30 Steel 810-875 10-30 Monel
875-1000 10-30 Aluminum 350-415 10-180
After annealing, the composite is compressed. The compression can
be in a single step, or in several steps. If several steps are
used, the composite is preferably bonded after the first
compression, and then rebonded after each succeeding compression
step. The degree of compression at the final step then is
determined by the desired density or voids volume, and pore
size.
The compression is applied perpendicularly to the plane of the
layers of the composite, or approximately perpendicularly, but not
more than 10.degree. from the perpendicular, since the displacement
component may be excessive at such larger angles. The compression
can be applied with restraint, as in a mold, but it is preferably
without restraint, as by platens, or by pressure rollers. Rolling
is preferred,
The composite should be subjected to a pressure of the order of 100
to 200,000 lbs. per square inch, the pressure applied depending
upon the ductility of the metal, and applied normal to the metal
surface, as by rolling or coining. If the pressure is less than the
deforming pressure for the metal of the wires, usually about 50,000
lbs. per square inch, it merely results in densification of the
composite, by forcing the layers and the wires closer together.
If the pressure applied is sufficiently great, a coining action can
be obtained, in which the composite is compressed to as little as
about 10 percent of the starting thickness. Reductions of as little
as 30% in the starting thickness can be sufficient, however, and
preferably the reduction is to from about 30 percent to about 65
percent of the starting thickness.
After compression, the layers and the filaments are set in their
new relative positions by bonding them together at their points of
contact. The layers and filaments can if desired be bonded by
welding, brazing, soldering or sintering, or by use of resinous
bonding agents, applied as solutions, dispersions, or from a
fluidized bed of the resin. They will, of course, be mechanically
interlinked or interleaved or interlocked, as a result of the
compression, so that a very strong structure results.
Brazing, soldering, resin bonding and welding, while fully
satisfactory, may reduce porosity and pore size to an undesirable
extent. Consequently, it is frequently preferred to integrate the
filaments at their points of contact by sintering.
The composite can be sintered by passing it through a furnace in a
non-oxidizing atmosphere, such as, for example, in a reducing
atmosphere of hydrogen or carbon monoxide, or mixtures thereof; or
in an inert atmosphere such as nitrogen, argon, helium, or
combinations thereof; or in a vacuum. The mesh is heated to a
temperature not exceeding approximately 20.degree. below the
melting point of the metal of which the filaments are formed.
Generally, the temperature will be in excess of 1,000.degree.F. The
result is a sintered integration of the metal at the points of
crossing.
After bonding has been effected, the composite can be compressed
again, such as by rolling, and then bonded again, such as by
sintering, and these steps can be repeated as many times as
necessary to give a composite having the desired characteristics,
for filtration, for acoustic insulation, or for other uses. The
final composite generally will have been reduced to between about
10 percent and about 95 percent of the starting thickness, and the
pore anisometricity will be such that the permeability for flow
through the pores extending laterally will be less than about 75
percent of that for flow through the pores extending across the
sheet, and preferably less than 60 percent, and this can be reduced
to zero. The permeability is defined as the volume of flow of any
fluid at unit differential pressure through a unit cube.
As one or several of the juxtaposed layers there can also be used
woven wire mesh, or metal plates or sheets, which can be perforated
or imperforate, and which can be at the surfaces or in the
interior, and which can be bonded thereto by any of the procedures
indicated above. The combination of the knitted wire mesh composite
with a perforated material is particularly useful, as it permits
the manufacture of light weight high strength materials, useful in
sound absorption in airborne applications. A layer of metal powder
can be dusted into the knitted wire mesh composite, or superposed
on one or both surfaces thereof, and bonded thereto, for example in
accordance with U.S. Pat. No. 3,017,917, dated Nov. 6, 1962.
If desired, the knitted mesh wire composites can also be laminated
to other materials, such as woven wire mesh, and metal plates and
sheets, perforated, if desired.
The knitted wire mesh composite can also be impregnated and/or
coated with fibrous material such as inorganic, metallic or organic
fibers, as disclosed for instance in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,158,532;
3,238,056; 3,246,767 and 3,353,682.
After bonding has been effected, the composite can be formed into
filter elements of the invention of any desired form or
configuration, with or without a support. The composite can be set
in the desired configuration by corrugating, folding, or other
shaping techniques, following which it can be put into the form of
a filter element, as, for example, by folding a corrugated sheet
into a cylindrical form, lapping over the free ends of the sheet,
and bonding them together to complete the cylinder. This cylinder
can be end-capped, if desired. The result is a rigid structure in
which the knitted wire mesh composite serves as the filtering
sheet. The knitted wire mesh composite is quite resistant to
deformation or distortion, under rather high liquid pressures. The
preceding is given merely as an example. It will be apparent that
any desired configuration can be adopted.
FIGS. 1 and 2 show an anisometric knitted wire mesh composite, made
up of ten layers 1 of a warp-type single-bar tricot knitted wire
mesh, 12 needle ends per inch, of 4 mil stainless steel wire 2,
rolled and sintered to a voids volume of 85 percent and a thickness
of 0.04 inch.
This composite can be cut into disks, and it can also be corrugated
into a sheet having a plurality of corrugation folds. Such a sheet
can be made into a cylindrical filter element, as shown in FIGS. 8
and 9, for example.
FIG. 3 shows photographically, enlarged six times, a stack of
sixteen layers of loose-weft-knitted mesh, of 0.004 inch diameter
wire, ready for rolling and sintering. The looped wires of the mesh
retain their knitted identity quite clearly.
FIG. 3A shows photographically, enlarged six times, the same stack
after rolling and sintering. The knitted pattern is still evident,
but the consolidation of the mesh has resulted in a considerable
reduction in the size of the mesh openings. The end view 3B shows
that the consolidation has in fact resulted in a sheet that is
plate-like in character, with a smooth surface. The porosity is
anisometric, with many through pores extending across the sheet,
and few through pores extending laterally.
FIG. 4A shows photographically, enlarged six times, another
sintered and rolled composite, made of 10 layers of the
loose-weft-knitted mesh of FIG. 3. The composite is more open, and
the pore size and voids volume are greater, partly because the
number of layers is less, and partly because of a lower pressure
and less percent reduction in thickness during the rolling and
sintering operation. Nonetheless, as FIG. 4B shows, the sheet is
platelike in character, and anisometric in porosity, the porosity
laterally being lower than that across the sheet.
FIGS. 5 and 6 show another anisometric knitted wire mesh composite,
made up of thirty layers of knitted mesh sheet. The first 15 are of
a loose-knit weft type stainless steel knitted mesh 4, 12 needle
ends per inch, and the second 15 are of a loose-knit-weft type
stainless steel mesh 5, 18 needle ends per inch. Both knitted mesh
are made of 2 mil wire 3. The difference in needle ends of the two
mesh produces a composite having coarse 50 microns average pores on
the upper side (shown in FIG. 6) and fine 10 microns average pores
on the lower side.
FIG. 7 shows an anisometric knitted wire mesh composite made of
five layers 6 of close-knit weft type stainless steel knitted mesh,
made of 10 mil wire 7.
The voids volume of the anisometric knitted wire mesh composite is
determined by measuring apparent volume and true volume. The
apparent volume of the material is determined by measurement of its
area and thickness. The true volume is determined by fluid
displacement techniques, using a fluid capable of wetting the
product. The voids volume is then determined by the following
equation:
Voids volume = 100 .times. 1 - [true volume of composite/apparent
volume of composite]
Calculated by this method, the knitted wire mesh composites
preferably have voids volumes of at least 50 percent and in some
instances 80 percent and even higher.
The pore size or diameter of the knitted wire mesh composites is
evaluated by the following test, which is substantially in
accordance with the procedure of U.S. Pat. No. 3,007,334.
A disk of the material to be tested is wetted with a fluid,
preferably ethyl alcohol, capable of wetting the porous material,
and clamped between rubber gaskets. The volume above the disk is
filled with the fluid. Air pressure is increased in the chamber
below the disk until a stream of air bubbles is observed emerging
from one point of the test piece. The effective pore diameter is
then calculated by the well-known formula:
pore diameter (microns) = K/pressure (inches of water)
This formula is discussed in WADC Technical Report 56-249, dated
May, 1956, entitled "Development of Filters for 400.degree.F. and
600.degree.F. Aircraft Hydraulic Systems" by David B. Pall, and
available from the ASTIA Document Service Center, Knott Building,
Dayton 2, Ohio. A detailed description of the bubble point test and
determination of pore size from the maximum particle passed will be
found in Appendix I of this report. See also U.S. Pat. No.
3,007,334, dated Nov. 7, 1961, to David B. Pall.
K is determined by measuring the maximum spherical glass bead or
carbonyl iron particle which passes through the element, in
accordance with WADC Technical Report 56-249 and MIL-F-8815 B
Paragraph 4.6.2.5 (Aug. 10, 1967).
The pore diameter obtained by this method is the maximum pore
diameter. By continuing to increase air pressure until the whole
surface of the filter vacuum is bubbling (known as the "open bubble
point"), the same constant can be used to compute an average
diameter characteristic of most of the pores. Tests have shown that
if air is passed at a velocity of 70 to 170 cm/min, the pressure
necessary to achieve the open bubble point taken together with the
K value given above gives a value for the pore opening
approximately the true average value. The ratio between the maximum
pore size and the average pore size of the microporous media of
this invention generally ranges from about 2:1 to about 4:1, a
relatively small difference which greatly increases the safety and
reliability of the product.
The following examples in the opinion of the inventors represent
preferred embodiments of their invention.
EXAMPLE 1
Four anisometric knitted wire mesh compositions were prepared, made
of 0.0011 inch diameter AISI 347 stainless steel wire, using a weft
knit mesh that had from 12 to 18 needle ends per inch. Sixteen
layers of this mesh were stacked at random orientation to make a
composite, and sintered at 1,200.degree.C. The composite was cut
into four pieces which were rolled to thicknesses of 0.007 inch,
0.0045 inch, 0.003 inch and 0.002 inch, respectively. The four
layers were stacked in that order, and resintered to make the final
anisometric composite.
The dirt capacity of the final composite was determined in
accordance with the following test procedure, which represents a
modification of the procedure of Military Specification
MIL-F-8815B. The composite described in the preceding paragraph was
clamped in a flow jig fitted with gaskets 31/2 inches OD and 3.06
inches ID, and connected to a pressure build-up and collapse
pressure apparatus, as defined in Section 4.6.2.7 of MIL-F-8815B,
Aug. 20, 1967. Hydraulic fluid conforming to Specification
MIL-H-5606 was run through the mesh at a flow of 40 gpm/ft.sup.2.
Direction of flow was such that the upstream face of the test piece
was the 0.007 inch (highest voids volume) face. Standardized fine
air cleaner (A-C fine) test dust in a slurry was added through the
dust valve in 0.2 gram increments at four-minute intervals. The
clean-up filter was not by-passed during this test. Two minutes
after each test dust addition, the pressure differential at rated
flow through the apparatus was recorded. The initial pressure drop
was 0.2 psid., and the weight of contaminant added in the same
manner to develop a differential pressure across the mesh of 15, 40
and 90 psid. was, respectively, 85, 91 and 97 grams/sq. ft. After
cleaning the composites, a suspension of glass beads in oil was
passed through them. The maximum bead passed was 62 microns. This
is the maximum particle rating.
These data represent a very high dirt capacity, considerably higher
than a woven wire mesh of equivalent maximum particle rating. For a
325 .times. 325 .times. 0.0014 stainless steel square weave wire
mesh, of nominal opening 43 microns, and maximum particle rating 51
microns, the weights of contaminant (AC Test Dust) were 20, 24, and
26 g./sq.ft. for differential pressures of 15, 40, and 90 psig.,
respectively for a 200 .times. 200 .times. 0.0021 stainless steel
square weave wire mesh of nominal opening 74 microns and maximum
particle rating 38 microns, the weights of contaminant were 56, 63,
68 g./sq.ft. to 15, 40 and 90 psig., respectively. These two woven
meshes are industry standards for removal ratings in the range of
43 to 83 microns. Thus, the knitted wire mesh composite of the
invention has a dirt capacity greater than that of woven wire mesh
of comparable or somewhat larger pore size.
EXAMPLE 2
An anisometric knitted wire mesh composite was prepared, made of
layers of 0.002 inch A151347 stainless steel wire weft knit mesh
having from 12 to 18 needle ends per inch. Ten layers of this were
stacked, annealed, rolled and sintered at 1,200.degree.C. to a
composite 0.006 inch thick. Twenty layers were stacked, annealed,
rolled and sintered at 1,200.degree.C. to a composite 0.008 inch
thick. Ten layers were stacked, annealed, rolled and sintered at
1,200.degree.C. to a composite 0.0023 inch thick. The three
composites were then stacked in that order, and resintered to make
the final anisometric composite.
The dirt capacity and maximum particle rating of this wire mesh
composite were determined in accordance with the test procedure of
Example 1. The weights of contaminant to 15, 40 and 90 psig. were
56, 60 and 78 grams/sq.ft., respectively.
The maximum particle rating was 71 microns.
EXAMPLE 3
An anisometric knitted wire mesh composite was prepared made from
64 layers of 0.0011 inch AISI 347 stainless steel wire weft knit
mesh having 12 to 18 needle ends per inch, stacked, annealed,
rolled and sintered at 1,200.degree.C. to a composite 0.028 inch
thick.
The dirt capacity and maximum particle rating of this composite
were determined in accordance with Example 1, except that the flow
was 50 g.p.m./sq. ft. The weights of contaminant to 15 40 and 90
psig. were 91, 107 and 120 g./sq.ft., respectively.
The maximum particle rating was 60 microns.
EXAMPLE 4
The procedure of Example 3 was repeated except that the final
composite was rolled and sintered to a composite 0.018 inch
thick.
The dirt capacity and maximum particle rating of this composite
were determined in accordance with Example 3. The weights of
contaminant to 15, 40 and 90 psig. were 64, 68 and 80
grams/ft.sup.2, respectively.
The maximum particle rating was 31 microns.
EXAMPLE 5
The composites of Examples 3 and 4 were stacked and sintered at
1,200.degree.C. The resultant composite was clamped in a flow jig
as in Example 1 with the 0.028 inch thick portion upstream.
The dirt capacity and maximum particle rating of this composite was
determined as in Example 3. The weights of contaminant to 15, 40
and 90 psig. were 81, 90 and 97 grams, respectively.
The maximum particle rating was 30 microns.
EXAMPLES 6 to 19
A number of anisometric knitted wire mesh composites were prepared,
from weft knitted wire mesh made of AISI 347 stainless steel wire,
0.002, 0.003 or 0.004 inch in diameter, as noted in Table I. These
were stacked, using the number of layers noted in the Table,
sintered at 1,150.degree. - 1,400.degree.C., rolled to the
thickness noted in the Table, and then resintered at 1,100.degree.
- 1,250.degree.C. The bubble points and air flow at the pressure
differential noted and the Rayl numbers were determined, and are
listed. The Rayl number is a measure of flow resistance, and is
discussed below. ##SPC1##
The tensile breaking strength, specific strength (ratio of breaking
strength to weight per unit area) and Young's Modulus were
determined for several of the Examples given in Table I. This data
is given in Table II:
TABLE II
Tensile Specific Example Breaking Strength Young's Modulus No.
Strength ft.* psi. lb./ft. 6 3468 7332 p.6 7 3432 7150 p.6 8 3744
7800 up.6 17 3564 6854 up.6 18 7140 7933 up.6 19 8820 8820 up.6
*lb./ft./lb./sq./ft.
For comparison with Examples 1 to 19, similar data is given in
Table III for a number of sintered woven wire mesh sheets of
comparable weights and pore size, made of the same stainless steel,
AISI 347, as these examples. ##SPC2##
It will be noted that all the above data is for material which has
been resintered, thus at least partially annealing the mesh, and
the variation in specific strength is not very large. This
indicates that, for any alloy, the breaking strength is about
proportional to the weight of material used, with the amount of
compression performed on the material having at most a small
effect.
These anisometric materials were satisfactory as filters for air
and for liquids.
EXAMPLES 20 TO 32
A number of anisometric knitted wire mesh composites were prepared,
from weft knitted wire mesh made of AISI 347 stainless steel wire,
0.002, 0.003, and 0.004 inch in diameter, as noted in Table IV.
These were stacked, using the number of layers noted in the table,
sintered at 1,150.degree. - 1,400.degree.C., rolled to the
thickness noted in the table (0.01 to 0.05 inch), resintered at
1,100.degree. - 1,250.degree.C., and the Rayl number and tensile
strength determined.
TABLE IV
Wire Actual Ex. Diameter Weight No. of Rayl Thickness No. (inch)
(lb./ Layers No. (inch) sq.ft.) 20 0.004 0.47 24 10 0.0125 21 0.003
0.75 112 59 0.031 22 0.003 0.58 94 43 0.0245 23 0.004 1.0 82 32
0.0485 24 0.004 0.85 66 50 0.0325 25 0.004 0.72 52 45 0.0235 26
0.004 0.61 44 44 0.0215 27 0.004 0.53 40 35 0.0175 28 0.004 0.63 50
32 0.0245 29 0.004 0.75 60 38 0.029 30 0.002 0.65 212 32 0.0425 31
0.002 0.65 212 50 0.036 32 0.002 0.80 242 32 0.048
EXAMPLES 33 TO 35 published number
For applications requiring high strength, the resintering step can
be omitted, so that the knitted mesh composite remains in a
work-hardened condition, or heat treatable materials can be used.
Example 33 is an instance of the former approach, Examples 34 and
35 the latter. These composites were prepared from weft-knitted
wire mesh made of the steel alloy noted in Table IV, stacked using
the number of sheets noted in the table, sintered at
1,150.degree.-1,400.degree.C., and rolled to the thickness noted in
the Table. Examples 34 and 35 were resintered at
1,100.degree.-1,250.degree.C., and heat treated for maximum
strength following manufacturer's published recommendations. The
Rayl number, breaking strength and specific strength were then
determined for all the examples. ##SPC3##
These materials were quite satisfactory as filters.
EXAMPLES 36 TO 39
It is also remarkable that the knitted mesh composites provide more
uniform permeability over the face of a composite than woven wire
mesh of comparable nominal permeability. Four knit mesh composites
and four woven wire mesh sheets were checked for Rayl number, 16
places each on sheets 18 .times. 48 inches in size. Results are
given in Table VI.
TABLE VI
Example Average No. Type Rayl Variation % Variation No. 36 Knitted
10 .+-.0.3 3.0 Control E Woven 13 .+-.1 7.7 37 Knitted 20 .+-.1 5.0
Control F Woven 27.5 .+-.2.5 9.1 38 Knitted 31 .+-.2 6.5 Control G
Woven 34 +6 +17.6 -3 -8.8 39 Knitted 50 .+-.3 6 Control H Woven 50
.+-.8 16
In all cases, the percentage variation for the knitted wire mesh
composites was lower than for the woven mesh, ranging from 3 to 6.5
percent for the knitted mesh composites as against 7.7 to 17.6
percent for the woven mesh.
EXAMPLE 40
An anisometric knitted wire mesh composite was prepared made from
122 layers of 0.002 inch AISI 347 stainless steel wire weft knit
mesh having from 12 to 18 needle ends per inch. These layers were
stacked on top of a perforated AISI 304 stainless sheet having
0.028 diameter holes on 0.063 inch centers in an equilateral
triangular pattern, sintered at 1,200.degree.C., rolled, and
sintered again. The final composite had a permeability of 50 Rayls,
a weight of 1.1 lbs/ft..sup.2, a Young's modulus of 13 .times.
10.sup.6 psi., a breaking strength of 12,240 lbs/ft. and a specific
strength of 11.12 ft.
By using perforated sheet made of high strength alloys, for
example, the precipitation hardening alloys such as 17-7 PH, 17-4
PH, AM 350, AM 355, etc., bonded to lower or higher yield strength
knitted wire mesh composites, even better mechanical properties can
be obtained.
Some high strength alloys are not readily available, or are very
expensive, when made as fine wire. By combining perforated material
made of very high strength alloys with knitted mesh composites made
of readily available wire, a high strength product is obtained at
low cost.
The anisometric wire mesh composites of the invention are
especially suited for use as liquid filter elements because of
their disproportionately high flow crosswise pf the sheet, their
unusually high dirt capacity, low flow resistance, and particle
removal rating, and their high strength. A typical filter unit
including an anisometric knitted wire mesh composite of the
invention as the filter element is shown in FIGS. 8 and 9.
The filter unit of FIGS. 8 and 9 comprises a filter housing or lead
40 having an inlet passage 41 and an outlet passage 42, opening
into a filter bowl 43 which is threadably attached to a dependent
portion 44 of the head. Disposed in the bowl 43 in a manner to
intercept liquid flow from the inlet 41 to the outlet 42 through
the bowl 43 is a filter element 45 composed of a corrugated
cylinder of an anisometric knitted stainless steel wire mesh
composite 46 of the invention, and an internal supporting core 47
held between top and bottom end caps 49 and 50, respectively. The
top end cap 49 with the biasing action of Belleville spring 48 at
the bottom of bowl 43, engages the dependent wall 51 of outlet 42
in a leakproof seal, so that all liquid entering the bowl 43 from
inlet 41 can leave the bowl only by passing through the filter
element 45.
A by-pass line 60 is provided, with a relief valve 61 arranged to
open at a predetermined pressure differential between inlet and
outlet passages 41 and 42, to ensure continued liquid flow in the
event of clogging of the filter element.
A pressure indicator 62 is provided, also responsive to a
predetermined pressure differential between the inlet and outlet
passages to indicate a clogged condition of the filter.
Thus, liquid in normal flow enters the head 40 via inlet 41, passes
into bowl 43 outside the filter mesh 46, passes through the mesh
and core 47 into the open space 63 enclosed thereby, and emerges as
filtered flow via outlet 42.
As the filter mesh 46 becomes clogged by the suspended contaminants
removed thereby, the pressure differential thereacross rises, and
eventually reaches the predetermined value at which the pressure
indicator 62 is actuated to show the clogged condition, and the
by-pass valve 51 is opened to ensure a continuing supply of liquid
to the outlet 42. The filter unit can then be taken out of service,
the bowl removed and the filter element replaced.
The filter element as shown is cylindrical, but any closed form can
be used, as well as flat sheets. It can be supplied with any type
of fitting, to secure it in the housing of the filter unit in a
manner to ensure that all liquid flow passes through the filter. It
is usually preferable to corrugate or fold the composite filter
sheet, to provide maximum surface area in a small space.
Other variations will be apparent to those skilled in the filter
art.
* * * * *