U.S. patent number 3,773,211 [Application Number 05/148,483] was granted by the patent office on 1973-11-20 for uterine aspiration collection bag.
Invention is credited to Henry Bridgman.
United States Patent |
3,773,211 |
Bridgman |
November 20, 1973 |
UTERINE ASPIRATION COLLECTION BAG
Abstract
In a uterine aspiration apparatus, a plastic collection bag is
used inside a single rigid collection bottle. The bag is of a
design that it does not collapse when the aspiration vacuum is
applied to the bottle. The bag collects the produces of the
operation and thus (1) keeps the rigid bottle clean for the next
operation, and (2) conveniently stores the aspirated material for
future laboratory analysis or recording purposes.
Inventors: |
Bridgman; Henry (Morristown,
NJ) |
Family
ID: |
26743457 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/148,483 |
Filed: |
June 1, 1971 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
63480 |
Aug 13, 1970 |
3713444 |
|
|
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
220/495.06;
604/319 |
Current CPC
Class: |
A61M
1/782 (20210501); A61M 1/0001 (20130101); A61M
1/85 (20210501); A61M 1/7411 (20210501) |
Current International
Class: |
A61M
1/00 (20060101); B65d 025/14 (); A61m 001/00 () |
Field of
Search: |
;220/63,65,63R
;128/275,276 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Lowrance; George E.
Parent Case Text
This invention relates generally to medical equipment and
particularly to equipment used in uterine aspiration. This
application is a continuation-in-part of my copending application
entitled Collection Bottle, Ser. No. 63,480, filed on Aug. 13,
1970, now U.S. Pat. No. 3,713,444.
Within the past 15 years, a technique called uterine aspiration, or
vacuum curettage, has been developed for performing abortions
during the early months of pregnancy. The earliest reference to
this technique appeared in an article by Y. T. Wu and H. C. Wu,
entitled "Suction in Artifical Abortion -- 300 Cases" in the
Chinese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 6, 1958,
beginning at page 447. A recent survey of the subject appeared in
an article by D. Kerslake and D. Casey entitled "Abortion Induced
by Means of Uterine Aspirator" in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol.
30. July 1967, pages 35 - 45. Very briefly the technique is to
aspirate the conceptus from the uterus using a tube which has a
flexible connection to a source of suction. A typical apparatus
includes a suction curet having an oval mount at its end, or on one
side, and an air hole at the other end to control the suction. A
rubber pressure tubing connects the curet to a transparent, e.g.,
glass, container which in turn is connected to a suction pump.
Aspiration of the uterine contents usually takes less than 2
minutes and the debris can readily be seen as it appears in the
glass container.
The method employed may be very briefly reviewed. The perineum,
vagina and cervix are disinfected. The cervix is then drawn forward
with a vulsella. The direction of the cervical canal and the depth
of the uterine cavity are determined with a uterine sound. It is a
common practice to dilate the cervix to allow easy insertion of the
suction curet. However, dilation may be unnecessary in certain
cases, and when not needed, an anesthesia generally is not used.
When dilation is required, a local or general anesthesia is
administered. The suction curet of appropriate diameter and design
is inserted carefully into the cervix. The suction is then started.
In a few seconds, the suction reaches a working level which
typically is at a mean level of 18 inches of mercury (relative).
THe suction curet is moved gently up and down over all aspects of
the uterine cavity. The debris from the conceptus passes visibly
into the glass container, either whole or piecemeal. The degree of
suction can be controlled with some aspirators by putting a thumb
over an airhole at the base of the curet as well as by using some
device on the pump. During the aspiration process, the uterus
reacts by contracting and decreasing in volume. Aspiration usually
takes less than 2 minutes. It is thought to be complete when the
uterine wall feels smooth and no further debris emerge.
A typical apparatus used for uterine aspiration consists of a curet
connected by a hose to a collection bottle which in turn is
connected by a second hose to a vacuum pump. The collection bottle,
with the traditional glass collection jar, presents certain
disadvantages, during both the operation and the normal
post-operative procedures. These include: performing a fetal count;
cleaning the collection jars; handling, storing, transporting and
disposing of the aspirated matter; and avoiding contamination of
the removed material when certain subsequent testing, etc., is
indicated.
Immediately after the surgeon has completed the vacuum curettage,
and before the patient is permitted to proceed to the recovery
room, an examination is made of the fetal parts to assure their
complete removal. With the traditional collection jar, it is
difficult by direct observation through the glass to make this
fetal part count aNd it is generally necessary to open the bottle
and spread out its solid contents. This count is sometimes
facilitated by the use of a porus gauze bag in the collection
bottle which separates the solid and liquid material. The bottle is
opened, the gauze bag removed, after which the fetal count is
performed on a cloth. It is preferable to count the fetal parts in
a liquid than in a semi-dry environment; yet when it is attempted
to count the parts in the traditional collection jar, it becomes
difficult to segregate the uncounted parts from those already
counted. The count has to be done accurately and rapidly; because
if parts are unaccounted for, the surgeon must continue the
operation until all parts are removed. These difficulties
associated with performing the fetal count are eliminated with the
apparatus of the present invention.
In addition to the fetal count, the aspirated material is also
subject to post-operative examinations (e.g., laboratory,
pathology, etc.) which are normally done at locations remote from
the operating theatre. For these analyses it is important that
there be a minimum chance of contamination, or other interaction
between the removed material and the environment. Since most of the
removed material is blood, it reacts almost immediately with oxygen
in the air, and is therefore desirable for laboratory testing
purposes that the removed products of conception have minimum
exposure to the environment before they are tested. Heretofore, the
collection bottle was opened, the contents were poured into a
container, which was then sealed, and sent out to the laboratory
area for analysis. In certain instances, the laboratory was not
scheduled to perform the necessary tests when the specimens arrived
and it then became necessary for laboratory to store the material
which was done typically by freezing. The placing of the material
into a container for freezing often required a further undesirable
transfer of the material into a new container.
The post-operative handling of the collected material, and cleaning
of the collection bottle itself is a distasteful time consuming
chore. The uterine contents, aspirated from a patient in the early
stages of pregnancy, have a consistency resembling fish entrails
accompanied by some blood and other fluids. Heretofore, the bottles
had to be, almost always, emptied and cleaned manually. This was a
very unpleasant task.
An additional consideration about the collected products of
conception, centers on the fact that this material has a very high
hormone content. It is often necessary to transfer and store this
material because of its hormone content (e.g., to extract the
hormone material for use in studies, or in the preparation of
certain drugs having a hormone content.) Thus, for this further
consideration, it becomes important that the aspirated material be
collected with a minimum handling, and not be exposed to the
environment more than absolutely necessary, and be held in a
container that can be readily transported, stored, and in which is
not fragile.
A solution to these and other requirements is provided by the
present invention in which an hermetically tight collection bag is
employed inside the collection bottle. Aspirated uterine contents
are deposited in the collection bag only, and do not come into
contact with the inside of the collection jar itself. It has been
found that because of the vacuum inside the collection bottle,
extending between the vacuum source and the curet, a special bag is
needed. This bag does not collapse under the influence of the
vacuum. In particular, the pressures in the space between the
collection bag and the collection jar must be equalized. If
provision is not made to equalize pressure around the collection
bag, the bag may become sucked into the vacuum source thereby
preventing the entire vacuum curettage apparatus from functioning,
and also possibly damaging the passageway leading from the vacuum
source, or even the vacuum source itself.
By using the collection bag of this invention, it is possible to
collect the aspirated products of conception completely in a liquid
tight collection bag proportional in size to the collection bottle.
At the end of an operation, the collection bottle is opened, and
the collection bag having all the aspirated material is merely
lifted out of the bottle. The bag is then tied or otherwise
fastened to seal it with the aspirated material completely
contained therein. The fetal count may be easily and rapidly
performed when the material is in the collection bag, by
appropriately squeezing the bag to move the solid material as
needed. The bag, of course, is of a transparent material.
The further advantages of such a collection bag are numerous. The
immediate one is in post operative clean-up routine. Since the
liquid tight collection bag is inside the rigid collection jar, the
jar has had no contact with the aspirated material, and is kept
completely clean. This avoids an unpleasant and time consuming
cleaning procedure. Furthermore, if a group of operations are to be
performed in sequence, a single uterine aspiration apparatus may be
used with a single bottle (and a stand by bottle or two) while
merely changing the collection bag for each operation. Formerly it
was necessary to have several collection bottles. This permits the
uterine aspiration apparatus to be used almost continuously.
Furthermore, when the aspirated material is to be transferred to a
laboratory for further testing, or to another remote location, it
may be easily transported in the collection bag itself. A
collection jar, thus, is not needed to transfer the material. It
will also be appreciated that when the material is to be sent to a
laboratory, the rapid closing of the bag tends to inhibit
contamination of the contents. Furthermore, the bag is preferably
of such a material that the products of aspiration can be stored in
the bag for a period of time, either at room temperature, or in a
freezer. THe collection bag preferably is made of a material of
sufficient toughness that, should it when full and sealed, be
accidentially dropped, it will not burst, and spill its contents.
Finally, when the contents of the bag are not required, the bag may
serve as a convenient disposal container.
Claims
What I claim is:
1. In a uterine aspiration system having a collection jar, cap
means for sealing said jar, and vacuum means for producing a
negative pressure in said sealed jar, the improvement comprising a
collection bag having dimensions to fit inside said jar adjacent
the inside jar walls, and to overlap at least the top of said jar
along a seal between said jar and said cap means; said bag
including appertures extending through its wall and positioned from
its bottom so that the volume of said bag from its bottom to said
appertures is sufficient to contain material aspirated by the
system; said appertures permitting equalization of air pressure
between the inside of said bag and the space between said bag and
the walls of said jar during the production of negative pressure by
said vacuum means, whereby no significant amount of air is
entrapped between said bag and said walls of said jar which
entrapped air would limit the capacity of said bag or might cause
said bag to be sucked into said vacuum means.
2. In the system according to claim 1 wherein said bag volume
exceeds 1 liter.
3. In the system according to claim 1 wherein said collection bag
is transparent, whereby the aspirated material can be examined in
the bag itself.
4. In a system according to claim 3, wherein said collection bag is
a clear polyethylene.
5. In a system according to claim 1, wherein said appertures are
one-quarter inch in diameter.
6. In a system according to claim 1, wherein said bag wall has a
thickness of 11/2 to 2 mils.
Description
The above, and other objects, features and advantages of this
invention, will become apparent in the following detailed
description of an illustrative embodiment thereof, which is to be
read in connection with the accompanying drawing wherein:
The FIGURE is an exploded three dimensional view of a collection
bottle having a collection bag which is constructed in accordance
with this invention.
Referring now to the FIGURE, there is shown a collection bottle
having a collection jar 10 with a base 12 and side walls 14. A
collection bag 20 is to be placed in collection jar 10, with the
upper portion of the bag overlying, or folded over, the top of the
jar walls. A gasket 30 is to be positioned over the upper rim of
the side walls 14 of the collection jar, on top of the overlying
portion of the collection bag. Above the gasket is a cap generally
indicated 40. A manifold 42 is mounted on the upper portion of the
cap and has three apertures or ports, 44, 46, and 48 extending
through the manifold and the cap. The first port 44 provides a
passage between a source of vacuum (not shown) and the inside of
the collection bottle. A hose insert coupling 50 is at the outer
end of the port, and a filter trap 52 at its inside end. The second
port 46, provides a passage between a hose (not shown) to be
connected to the operating curet and the inside of the bottle. It
includes on its outer end, a hose insert coupling 54 which is
adapted to be connected to the hose (not shown), and at its inner
end a dip tube 56 extending downward from the inside of the cap.
The dip tube 56 directs the aspirated material during the course of
the operation into the lower portion of the collection bag 20. The
third port 48 in the manifold and cap is connected to a vacuum
gauge 58 that provides an indication of the vacuum inside the
collection bottle when it is in operation. A more detailed
description of the collection bottle and its parts is in my
copending patent application cited above.
As indicated in FIG. 1, the collection bottle is assembled by first
placing the collection bag 20 inside the collection jar 10. The
gasket 30 is then placed on top of that portion of the collection
bag 20 which overlies the upper rim of the collection jar 10. The
lid, which may have an inner flange (not shown) to properly center
it on the gasket and collection jar is then placed on top of the
gasket and two, (shown schematically) lock-down clips 60 on each
side of the collection jar are used for securing the cap, gasket,
and jar together. As the operation is to commence, a vacuum is
drawn at port 44, and as the operation progresses, the aspirated
material enters through port 46 and accumulates in the bottom of
the collection bag 20.
The collection jar, collection bag, gasket and cap are all
assembled and sealed prior to drawing the vacuum. When the vacuum
is applied, it is important that the air pressure between the
outside walls of the collection bag 20 and the bottom and side
walls of the collection jar 10 are equal. If they are not equal,
and the pressure on the outside of the bag (i.e., between the bag
and the inside wall of the jar) is greater than the pressure on the
inside of the bag, the bag will move away from the bottom and sides
of the jar; and as the vacuum increases, the bag may be sucked into
the vacuum port 44, effectively clogging the vacuum source and
cutting off the vacuum in the bottle. If only a small quantity of
air is trapped between the collection jar and the collection bag,
the bag is not sucked into port 44, but the trapped air creates a
bubble between the jar and bag. This reduces the collection
capacity of the bottle, and increases the chance of collected
material clogging the trap 52 or being carried over into the vacuum
source if there is no trap. More important, however, volume of the
trapped bubble fluctuates as the vacuum inside the collection bag
varies (as it will during the normal course of an operation). This
change in volume moves the surface of the collection bag and as the
operation progresses, and material is introduced into the
collection bag, the bag will shift and move around. Thus, it is
essential that the air pressure on both sides of that portion of
the collection bag which is inside the collection bottle be
substantially equal when the vacuum is initially turned on, and
throughout the operation.
To achieve this end, of providing equal pressure on both sides of
the collection bag, a series of apertures 62 are provided in the
upper portion of the side walls of the collection bag 20. These
apertures permit the air on both sides of the bag to be maintained
at a substantially constant pressure. If air is initially between
the collection bag and the collection jar, as is usually the
situation, it is removed when the vacuum is applied since the air
can escape by passing through these apertures. As the collection
bag starts to fill up, any remaining air caught inbetween the bag
and the jar is squeezed upward and passes through these apertures
62. Thus, by means of the apertures 62, the collection bag stays in
place during the course of the operation.
The location of the apertures 62 should be near the upper inside
portion of the bottle. The apertures should be sufficiently high
that the collected material will not rise above them, and spill
through them onto the inside of the jar. The collection bottle is
preferably of sufficient size to permit a bag of sufficient length,
such that after the operation, the upper portion of the bag may be
twisted around and knotted below the line of the apertures, to
secure the bag and to confine its contents. It should be
appreciated, however, that it is not essential that the bag be
knotted on itself, and any suitable fastening means may be used,
such as squeezing the upper portion of the bag together (of course
this takes place below the line of apertures) and attaching a
fastener, such as tape, or a non-cutting wire twist member to
secure the bag shut.
In the bag, the vent holes 62 are located (1) high enough to
prevent loss of the evacuated material, (2) yet low enough to clear
the gasket and cap and also, (3) at a position to allow
equalization of pressure. A typical size for the collection bag is
about 2 liters volume below the vents.
Thus, there has been shown and described a collection bag for use
in a collection bottle of a uterine aspiration apparatus. The bag,
remains substantially in place lining the collection jar throughout
the operation and collects the aspirated uterine material, and any
flush liquids. When the operation is complete the bag may be lifted
out; if necessary a fetal count may be performed by observing the
contents through the walls of the bag without removing the material
from the bag. The bag may then be tied off below the perferations,
and thereby conveniently store the material for future
transportation, laboratory analysis, recording, etc. It will be
noted that the rigid collection jar itself has been kept completely
clean.
A collection bag has been constructed in accordance with this
invention and the following dimensions for that bag are set foth
below. It should be understood however, that these dimensions are
for purposes of example only, and variations may be made therefrom
without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention:
bag length: 14 inches;
vent holes, measured from the bottom of the bag: 91/2 inches;
bag width measured flat: 9 inches;
vent hole diameter: 1/4 inch;
total number of vent holes per bag: eight;
distance between adjacent vent holes: 21/4 inches;
bag material, clear polyethylene;
bag wall thickness 11/2 to 2 mils;
lower bottom portion of bag, heat sealed.
Although an illustrative embodiment of this invention has been
described in detail herein with reference to the accompanying
drawing, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited
to that precise embodiment, and that various changes and
modifications may be effected therein by one skilled in the art
without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention.
* * * * *