U.S. patent number 3,743,021 [Application Number 05/163,856] was granted by the patent office on 1973-07-03 for method for cleaning well perforations.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Shell Oil Company. Invention is credited to Herbert W. Barnes, Thomas Vernon McCauley, George O. Suman, Jr..
United States Patent |
3,743,021 |
McCauley , et al. |
July 3, 1973 |
METHOD FOR CLEANING WELL PERFORATIONS
Abstract
Sand control operations in cased and perforated wells completed
into unconsolidated formations are improved by first cleaning the
perforations by packing off the perforated interval of the well,
rapidly opening the packed-off interval of the well into fluid
communication with a low-pressure chamber to surge fluid from
surrounding earth formations through the perforations and into the
well, allowing debris carried by the surging fluid to settle, and
circulating debris from the well.
Inventors: |
McCauley; Thomas Vernon (New
Orleans, LA), Barnes; Herbert W. (New Orleans, LA),
Suman, Jr.; George O. (Houston, TX) |
Assignee: |
Shell Oil Company (Houston,
TX)
|
Family
ID: |
22591874 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/163,856 |
Filed: |
July 19, 1971 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
166/311 |
Current CPC
Class: |
E21B
37/08 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
E21B
37/00 (20060101); E21B 37/08 (20060101); E21b
021/00 () |
Field of
Search: |
;166/311,177,299,163 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Leppink; James A.
Claims
I claim as my invention:
1. In a method of completing a well wherein the well bore hole is
cased with a tubular casing that is subsequently perforated with a
number of perforations to open the bore hole into fluid
communication with a fluid-containing subsurface earth formation,
the improvement which comprises cleaning the perforations to remove
debris therefrom by:
packing off a perforated interval of the casing with at least one
packer;
positioning adjacent the packed-off interval a chamber containing a
gas at a pressure substantially lower than the formation pressure,
the chamber having a selected volume of at least about one-fourth
gallon times the number of perforations in the packed-off
perforated interval of the well;
rapidly opening the chamber into fluid communication with the
packed-off perforated interval whereby fluid surges from the
fluid-containing formation through the perforations and into the
casing carrying debris from the perforations into the well; and
permitting debris to settle in the well.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of positioning a chamber
adjacent the packed-off interval comprises the steps of:
disposing first and second valve means at longitudinally displaced
points in a tubular string of pipe to form a chamber portion within
the string of pipe between the two valve means; and
extending the string of pipe, including the chamber portion, into
the well.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein the chamber positioned adjacent
the packed-off interval contains air at substantially atmospheric
pressure.
4. In a method of completing a well wherein the well bore hole is
cased with a tubular casing that is subsequently perforated with a
number of perforations to open the borehole into fluid
communication with a fluid-containing subsurface earth formation,
the improvement which comprises cleaning the perforations to remove
debris therefrom by:
packing off a perforated interval of the casing with at least one
packer;
positioning adjacent the packed-off interval a chamber containing a
gas at a pressure substantially lower than the formation pressure,
the chamber having a selected volume of at least about one-fourth
gallon times the number of perforations in the packed-off
perforated interval of the well;
rapidly opening the chamber into fluid communication with the
packed-off perforated interval whereby a controlled volume of fluid
substantially equal to the selected volume of the chamber surges
from the fluid-containing formation through the perforations and
into the casing carrying debris from the perforations into the
well;
unseating the packer to open the packed-off interval to fluid
communication with the surface through the casing; and
circulating a fluid from the surface into the well to remove debris
from the well.
5. The method of claim 4 wherein the step of positioning a chamber
adjacent the packed-off interval comprises the steps of:
disposing first and second valve means at longitudinally displaced
points in a tubular string of pipe to form a chamber portion within
the string of pipe between the two valve means; and
extending the string of pipe, including the chamber portion, into
the well.
6. The method of claim 4 including the step of allowing debris
carried by the surging fluid into the packed-off interval to settle
for at least 15 minutes before circulating fluid to remove debris
from the well.
7. In a well having a cemented casing perforated with a plurality
of perforations which open the interior of the casing into fluid
communication with an unconsolidated sand formation containing a
fluid at a pressure, a method of excluding sand from the casing
without locking perforation-plugging debris in the perforations
comprising the steps of:
installing upper and lower valve means in a string of tubular pipe
to form a closed chamber between the valve means having a volume of
at least about one-fourth gallon times the number of perforations
in the plurality of perforations but less than 1 gallon times that
number;
lowering the string of tubular pipe into the well through the
casing with the pressure in the closed chamber substantially less
than the pressure in the sand formation;
packing-off the annular space between the tubular pipe and the
casing above the perforations by setting a packer;
opening the lower valve to connect the chamber in fluid
communication with the perforated portion of the casing whereby
fluid surges from the formation, through the perforations and into
the casing carrying debris into the casing; and
installing sand exclusion means to exclude sand from the
casing.
8. The method of claim 7 including the steps of after opening the
lower valve:
releasing the packer to open the well to fluid communication
between the earth surface and the perforated portion of the casing
through the annular space between the tubular pipe and the
casing;
opening the upper valve; and
circulating a fluid from the surface through the tubular pipe and
annular space between the tubular pipe and the casing to remove
debris from the casing.
9. The method of claim 8 including the steps of:
temporarily plugging the perforations by injecting an acid soluble
plugging material into the perforations before circulating the
debris-removing fluid; and
injecting an acid into the perforations after circulating debris
from the casing to open the temporarily plugged perforations.
10. The method of claim 7 wherein the sand exclusion means is a
gravel pack.
11. The method of claim 7 wherein the sand exclusion means is a
resin coating applied to sand adjacent the casing.
12. The method of claim 7 wherein the sand exclusion means is a
metal coating applied to sand adjacent the casing by electroless
metal plating.
13. The method of claim 7 wherein the sand exclusion means is
installed without withdrawing the tubular string of pipe from the
well and including the step of
producing fluid from the formation through the tubular string of
pipe including the open upper and lower valves.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to the field of completing wells, and more
particularly, to a method for cleaning perforations in a cased and
perforated well.
2. Description of the Prior Art
In completing wells, such as oil wells, it is common practice to
drill the well bore hole into an oil containing formation, cement a
tubular casing throughout the length of the bore hole, and
thereafter perforate the casing and cement adjacent the oil
containing formation to open the formation into fluid communication
with the interior of the casing. If the oil containing formation
behind the perforated casing is unconsolidated, it may be necessary
to provide means for excluding sand from the well bore before the
well can be put on production.
It has been found that the presence of unconsolidated sand even in
small quantities can seriously effect the operation of both the
producing and injection wells. Besides high rate of wear on
subsurface and surface equipment due to sand abrasion, partial or
complete plugging of a well can occur. If no sand control means is
provided, expensive well cleanout is frequently required. In
extreme instances the cleanout may not be possible and the well
must be abandoned.
Two widely used sand exclusion methods are the installation of
gravel or sand packs in the well bore adjacent the production
interval and the consolidation of the formation sand in and/or
around the well bore. Consolidation may, for example, be achieved
by injecting plastics or resins into the formation or by metal
plating the formation. Such consolidation techniques are described
in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,294,166 and 3,393,737.
In some oil producing regions where unconsolidated sands are common
and where the above-mentioned sand control methods are frequently
used, a high incidence of sand control failure with associated
casing damage has been observed. An important factor causing this
failure is injectivity impairment into the unconsolidated sands
adjacent the perforated interval of the well bore. It is believed
that injectivity impairment may be caused by a number of factors.
Among these are pulvarized material force from the cement sheath,
pulvarized and compacted formation material, and perforation change
debris. When using sand consolidating techniques to control sand,
the impairment can prevent injection of consolidating fluids into
the formation through some of the perforations. This prevents
complete consolidation of the interval adjacent the well bore.
Additionally, treatment of impaired perforations can cause the
impairment to become "locked in place" by the consolidating
material.
It has also been found that permeability impairment in
unconsolidated sands can inhibit deposition of gravel in
perforation tunnels where sand control is by gravel packing.
Tunnels are best filled with gravel if fluid flows out of the
wellbore through the perforation tunnels thus carrying packing
material into these tunnels. The absence of gravel in perforation
tunnels allows fine formation sand to fill in the tunnels when the
well is placed on production. This fine formation sand severely
restricts fluid flow, and thereby decreases well productivity.
A number of techniques have been proposed for improving injectivity
into the unconsolidated interval prior to the installation of said
control means. Among these techniques are acid stimulation and
fracturing. It has been found that each of these methods has the
disadvantage that in many cases acid or fracturing fluid moves into
the formation through only some of the perforations. Since all
perforations are not opened, uniform placement of said control
means throughout the interval is not assured.
It is known that flow impairing materials can be removed from
perforations which extend into consolidated formations by
perforating the well with the pressure in the unperforated well
casing lower than the formation pressure. This causes formations
fluids to surge into the casing carrying debris from the formation.
The method is referred to as "underbalanced perforating". A second
technique which has been successfully used in consolidated
formations is to backflow material into the well bore after the
well is perforated by reducing well bore pressure. This can be done
by swabbing fluid from the well bore to reduce the fluid column in
the well.
Unfortunately, these techniques have often not been successful in
unconsolidated formations which are pressure depleted (i.e.
formations in which the pressure of reservoir fluids is
significantly less than hydrostatic pressure). A major disadvantage
of these methods is that it is very difficult to control the amount
of fluid which flows into the well bore. If the well bore fluid
column is drawn down too much, then an excessively large volume of
fluid may surge into the well carrying a large volume of formation
sand. When this occurs, it is necessary to remove the sand before
sand control means are installed. This, of course, results in
additional expenditures of time and increases the cost of sand
control installation. Additionally, if an excessively large volume
of fluid flows into the well bore, formation sand around the entire
casing can be disturbed. This may result in impairment of formation
permeability adjacent the well, thus reducing well
productivity.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
We have now found that well perforations in a well cased with a
tubular casing which is substantially perforated to open the well
into fluid communication with an unconsolidated, fluid containing
sub-surface earth formation can be cleared of perforation debris
without sanding up the well bore and without creating permeability
impairment of the adjacent formation by disturbing sands adjacent
well bore by a method which comprises the steps of packing off the
perforated interval of the well with at least one packer;
positioning adjacent the packed off interval a chamber containing a
gas at a pressure substantially lower than the formation pressure,
the chamber having selected volume of at least about one-fourth
gallon per perforation in the perforated interval of the well but
less than 1 gallon per perforation; and rapidly opening the chamber
into fluid communication with the packed-off perforated interval
whereby fluid surges from the fluid containing formation through
the perforations and into the well carrying debris from the
perforations into the well. The debris may be permitted to settle
to the bottom of the well or, advantageously, be removed by
unseating the packer to open the packed-off interval to fluid
communication with the surface through the casing and circulating a
fluid from the surface to the bottom of the well to remove debris
from the well. The method is advantageously used prior to the
installation of sand exclusion means.
In a preferred embodiment the chamber of lower pressure is provided
by disposing upper and lower valve means in a string of tubular
pipe. A chamber-portion is formed within the string of pipe between
the valve means when they are closed. The chamber is operatively
positioned by extending the string of pipe into the well. Opening
the lower valve opens the chamber into fluid communication with the
packed-off interval.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
The drawing shows a cross-sectional view of a sub-surface earth
formation traversed by a well suitably equipped for the practice of
this invention.
DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Referring to the FIGURE we see an hydrocarbon bearing,
unconsolidated sub-surface earth formation 10 traversed by bore
hole of a well 11 in which tubular casing 12 has been cemented with
cement 13. The casing 12 and cement 13 adjacent the formation 10
have been perforated by conventional means, such as jet or gun
perforating, with a number of perforations 14.
To insure uniform placement of sand exclusion means such as a
gravel pack or in situ consolidating materials (for example resin
or metal plating solutions) according to the method of this
invention, a string of tubing 15 carrying a packer 16 is run into
the well 11. The packer 16 is set above the perforating interval 17
of the casing 12 to pack off the annular space 22 between the
casing 12 and the tubing 15. In the drawing, the formation 10 is
the lowest productive interval in the well 11. It should be
understood that this method may be used in treating upper zones in
wells which traverse more than one productive interval. When upper
zones are treated, lower zones should be isolated by any suitable
conventional means such as the positioning of a bridge plug in the
casing 12 below the perforated interval 17 adjacent the formation
10 to be treated.
The tubing 15 carries a sealed low pressure chamber 18 containing a
gas at a pressure substantially lower than the fluid pressure in
the formation 10. In practice the gas in the chamber 18 is
advantageously air at substantially atmospheric pressure since this
eliminates the need for special equipment to prepare the chamber.
However, other gases and pressures may be used with equal effect.
It is only necessary that the pressure in the chamber 18 be
sufficiently lower than the pressure in the formation 10 to allow
an adequate volume of fluid to flow into the chamber 18. In
practice operators may prefer that the pressure difference between
the fluids in the formation 10 and the low pressure chamber 18 be
the maximum available to insure creation of an initial surge of
fluid through the perforations 14 at a rate sufficient to dislodge
debris tightly packed in the perforations 14 during the perforating
process. However, we have found that initial pressure differences
in the range of 1,200 psi to 4,000 psi have worked equally
well.
The volume of the chamber 18 for best results is at least about
one-fourth gallon per perforation in the perforated interval 17 and
less than about 1 gallon per perforation. We have found that for
chamber volumes less than about one-fourth gallon per perforation,
productivity through subsequently placed sand control installations
is not greatly improved. For volumes greater than about 1 gallon
per perforation, the well tends to become filled with sand washed
through the perforations 14, and further productivity improvement
is not achieved.
The chamber 18 is connected with the interior of the tubing 15
above and below the chamber 18 by valve means 19 and 20 of a type
which may be opened from the surface. For example, the lower valve
20 may be a full opening shock valve which is opened by means such
as applying tubing weight or by pressurizing the annular space
between the casing 12 and tubing 15. Similarly, the upper valve 19
may be of a type opened by dropping a bar, application of
additional tubing weight, or pressurizing the tubing 15. To clean
the perforations 14 the lower valve 20 is rapidly opened after the
packer 16 is set. This allows a controlled volume of fluids from
the formation 10 to surge through the perforations 14 into the well
11 as fluid in the well moves into the low pressure chamber 18. The
fluid flowing through the perforations 14 carries debris such as
pulvarized formation material into the well 11.
In some cases, the debris merely can be permitted to settle to the
bottom of the well 11 prior to the installation of sand control
means. This is achieved by waiting a sufficient time, usually about
1 hour, for settling to take place prior to disturbing fluids in
the well 11.
However, in many cases it is advantageous to remove the debris from
the well 11. This insures that the debris is not carried back into
the perforations 14 as fluid, for example in situ consolidation
fluid, is injected into the formation. To remove the debris from
the well 11, the packer 16 is released, and the upper valve 19 is
opened. Cleaning fluid such as salt water, a liquid hydrocarbon, or
other suitable liquid can then be circulated from the surface down
the tubing 15 and up the annular space between the tubing 15 and
casing 12 to carry debris away from the perforated interval 17.
Sand control means is then installed in a conventional manner.
In some cases best results may be obtained by allowing debris to
settle in the well 11 for 15 minutes or more before circulating
cleaning fluid. Advantageously, sufficient tail pipe 21 is run
below the packer to enable lowering the tubing string 15 to the
bottom of the well 11 when circulating debris out of the well 11
without running the packer 16 through the perforated interval. This
avoids washing additional sand into the well bore as the packer
passes up through the perforations 14 after washing to bottom.
It has been found that in some cases when the pressure in the
formation 10 is depleted, the circulating cleaning fluid may flow
in large amounts back through the perforations 14 and into the
formation 10 carrying debris into the perforations 14. Therefore it
is advantageous in such cases to inject a temporary plugging
material into the perforations 14 prior to circulating debris out
of the well. A suitable material is an aqueous suspension of about
25 pounds per barrel of a mixture of lignolsulfonate and 22-40
micron calcium carbonate particles. The suspended material screens
out on the formation to plug the perforations. After debris has
been circulated from the well, the material is dissolved by pumping
an acid, such as hydrochloric acid, down the tubing 16.
The method of this invention is most advantageously practiced by
using one or more sections or joints of the tubing 15 and full
opening valves 19 and 20 to form the low pressure chamber 18. This
provides flexibility in choosing chamber size without requiring
equipment additional to that normally used in sand consolidation
other than the two valves 19 and 20. For example, if the length of
the perforated interval 17 is 60 feet and if the casing 12 is
provided with four perforations per foot, then if the tubing 15 is
27/8 inch O.D. tubing (which has a capacity of about 20 gallons per
hundred feed of length) the low pressure chamber 18 can comprise
300 to 1,200 feet of tubing (i.e., a capacity between about 60 and
240 gallons which is one-fourth to 1 gallon per perforation)
between an upper valve 19 and a lower valve 20. If other chamber
volumes are desired, it is only necessary to change the length of
the tubing section.
The use of full opening valves 19 and 20 allows fluid to be
circulated through the tubing string 21 after the perforations have
been cleaned without obstruction from the back surge apparatus.
Therefore, if the sand control means to be installed around the
casing 12 is installed by injecting fluids into the formation, as
in resin or metal plating type consolidation, sand control means
placement can continue without withdrawing the tubing string 15
from the well 11. After debris carried into the well 11 has been
circulated out of the well, or permitted to settle, the necessary
resin or metal plating fluids may be injected down the tubing
string 15 and into the formation 17. In most cases, it will be
advantageous to reset the packer 16 before injecting these
materials. In some cases, it may be advantageous to leave the valve
19 and 20 in the well as a permanent part of the tuning string 15
which is then used as a production tubing string. Thus perforations
14 may be cleaned, the formation 10 consolidated in situ, and the
well 11 put on production without withdrawing the tubing 15 from
the well.
* * * * *