U.S. patent number 3,739,852 [Application Number 05/141,908] was granted by the patent office on 1973-06-19 for thermal process for recovering oil.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Esso Production Research Company. Invention is credited to Robert C. West, Edward G. Woods.
United States Patent |
3,739,852 |
Woods , et al. |
June 19, 1973 |
THERMAL PROCESS FOR RECOVERING OIL
Abstract
Disclosed herein is a thermal method for recovering oil from a
subterranean formation in which a substantially cylindrical heated
zone is created in the formation and in which heat can be
introduced into the formation at a high rate. In the method a
heated fluid (preferably steam) is injected down a well and into
the formation at a pressure which is less than the formation
breakdown pressure. Preferably, formation fluids are then withdrawn
by means of the well. Subsequently, a heated fluid (again,
preferably steam) is injected into the formation at a pressure
greater than the formation breakdown pressure. Oil which has been
heated by the injected fluids is recovered, preferably by means of
the injection well, from the formation.
Inventors: |
Woods; Edward G. (Houston,
TX), West; Robert C. (Houston, TX) |
Assignee: |
Esso Production Research
Company (Houston, TX)
|
Family
ID: |
22497759 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/141,908 |
Filed: |
May 10, 1971 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
166/303;
166/305.1 |
Current CPC
Class: |
E21B
43/24 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
E21B
43/16 (20060101); E21B 43/24 (20060101); E21b
043/24 () |
Field of
Search: |
;166/303,35R,308,263 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Wolfe; Robert L.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A method of recovering oil from a subterranean formation which
comprises injecting a heated fluid into the formation by means of a
well at a pressure less than the breakdown pressure, then
withdrawing oil from the formation by means of the well,
subsequently injecting a heated fluid into the formation by means
of the well at a pressure greater than the formation breakdown
pressure, and recovering oil from the formation by means of the
well.
2. A method as defined in claim 1 wherein the first injected heated
fluid is steam.
3. A method as defined in claim 2 wherein the steam is injected in
sufficient quantity to heat the formation to steam temperature at a
distance of at least 25 wellbore radii from the well.
4. A method as defined by claim 3 wherein the steam is injected in
a quantity to heat the formation to steam temperature at a distance
of no more than 100 wellbore radii from the well.
5. A method as defined by claim 1 wherein the second injected
heated fluid is steam.
6. A method as defined by claim 5 wherein the quantity of the steam
is from about five to about 20 times as great on a weight basis as
the quantity of the first injected heated fluid.
7. A method as defined in claim 1 further comprising injecting
further quantities of heated fluid into the formation subsequent to
recovering oil from the formation and producing further quantities
of oil from the formation.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to the recovery of petroleum from a
subterranean formation utilizing a well or wells for the injection
of heated fluids and for the withdrawal of petroleum.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Among the more promising methods that have been suggested or tried
for the recovery of oil from viscous oil reservoirs are those which
introduce thermal energy into the reservoirs. The viscosity of the
oil in these reservoirs is generally so high that the oil cannot be
recovered at economical rates using conventional techniques.
However, the viscosity of these oils can generally be radically
reduced by heating. Consequently, when thermal energy is introduced
into these reservoirs and the oil is heated, the viscosity will
generally be reduced to a point that the oil can flow at efficient
and economical rates.
The thermal energy may be in a variety of forms. Hot water, in situ
combustion, and steam are examples of forms of thermal energy which
have been used to recover oil from these viscous oil reservoirs.
Each of these thermal energy agents can be useful under certain
conditions. However, steam is generally the most efficient and
economical and is clearly the most widely employed thermal energy
agent.
A number of suggestions have been advanced for improving the
efficiency of "steaming operations" for oil recovery. Considerable
effort has been directed to one facet of this problem--increasing
the fluid conductivity of such reservoirs. For example, it has been
suggested that the formation may be fractured wth steam to increase
its permeability and to place heat quckly into tht formation at a
substantial distance from the wellbore. Similarly, it has been
suggested that, in an uncondolidated formation, steam be injected
at a pressure which is greater than the overburden pressure to
create a fluidized zone within the formation. Also, it has been
suggested that a plugging agent be included in a fracturing fluid
to create an extensive fracture within the formation prior to steam
injection. Each of these methods has the underlying purpose of
increasing the permeability of the formation to the injected heated
fluid and of permitting the steam to travel a substantial distance
from the wellbore in a relatively short period of time.
These techniques can be effective in accomplishing their purpose of
creating a highly conductive flow path within the formation for
injected steam and of heating the formation at a substantial
distance from the well. These fracture systems are plane-like heat
sources and can be beneficial to certain oil recovery processes.
For example, where steam is continuously injected through one well
into a fracture in the formation to drive oil before it to an
offset producing well, the heat from the fracture covers a wide
portion of the formation. Nevertheless, such planar heat sources
can be undesirable in other steaming operations.
In steam stimulation processes, it is preferable to retain the heat
near the injection well. In this process, commonly referred to as
the "huff-and-puff" process, steam is injected into the formation
through a well and subsequently heated oil is withdrawn from the
formation by means of the same well. Since the same well is used
for both injection and production, it is desirable to have a
substantially cylindrical heated zone around the well. Such a
cylindrical heated zone is most efficient in transferring thermal
energy to the oil in the formation. A fracture formed in accordance
with the teaching of the prior art at the location of the
injection-production well will not assist in forming a cylindrical
heated zone; the heated zone around such a fracture would resemble
an ellipse with a high degree of eccentricity. The thermal energy
which passes through the fracture heats oil in the more remote
areas of the reservoir. This heated oil which is remote from the
well has a tendency to cool to the point where it will no longer
flow before it can be produced. As a consequence, the efficiency of
the process declines.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In the practice of this invention, the heated zone around an
injection well has a desirable configuration, i.e., approximately
cylindrical, and the zone has a high conductivity to injected
fluids. These desirable results are accomplished by first heating
the formation by injecting a heated fluid, such as steam, at a
pressure which is less than the formation breakdown pressure. This
first injection step creates a heated zone which is substantially
cylindrical. Preferably, fluids are then withdrawn from the
formation by means of the well to reduce the oil saturation within
the heated region. Subsequently, a heated fluid, which also may be
steam, is injected into the formation at a pressure exceeding the
formation breakdown pressure. This second injection step generally
creates a fracture or pressure-parting of the formation which is
highly conductive to injected fluids. In addition, due to the
higher pressure of the second injection step a relatively high
fluid injection rate is achieved. However, due to the first
injection step, the fracture is less extensive than it would be in
the absence of the first injection step. As a consequence, the
heated region around the injection well is larger but remains
approximately cylindrical. Thus, in the practice of this invention,
two desirable results are achieved. The heated fluid can be
injected at a high rate, and the heated region around the injection
well retains an approximately cylindrical configuration.
DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a schematic elevation view in partial section of a well
intersecting an oil-bearing formation.
FIG. 2 is a schematic plan view of the oil-bearing formation
penetrated by the well and illustrating the heated regions around
the well following the initial injection of steam into the
formation.
FIG. 3 is a schematic plan view of the oil-bearing formation
penetrated by the well and illustrating the heated regions around
the well following the subsequent injection of steam.
FIG. 4 is a schematic plan view of an oil-bearing formation
penetrated by a well and showing the heated regions around the well
where the formation is fractured in accordance with the teachings
of the prior art.
DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The practice of this invention can perhaps be most easily
understood by reference to the drawings. Referring to FIG. 1, an
oil-bearing formation shown generally at 10 is penetrated by a well
or borehole 11 which has been drilled from the surface of the earth
(not shown). A string of large diameter pipe or casing 12 is placed
in the hole and bonded to the walls of the well by the cement
sheath 13 in a conventional manner. The casing 12, the cement
sheath 13, and the formation 10 are then perforated to provide
paths 14 for fluid communication between the interior of the casing
and the formation. A string of small diameter pipe or tubing 15 is
suspended within the casing 12 for the injection of fluids into,
and for the withdrawal of fluids from, the formation. The exterior
of the tubing is fitted with a packer assembly 16 which engages the
interior of the casing to bar fluid communication within the
casing-tubing annulus at that location. It should be understood
that this is a conventional well completion which may be used in
the practice of this invention. However, the invention is not
limited to this specific apparatus. Any well completion apparatus
which is capable of being used in the following described process
will be satisfactory.
With a completion assembly such as that illustrated in FIG. 1, a
heated fluid is injected down the tubing and into the oil-bearing
formation. As will be discussed in more detail later, a number of
fluids may be used in the practice of this invention. However,
saturated steam generally will be preferred and the most convenient
to use. The invention will therefore be discussed in terms of
saturated steam.
The initial volume of saturated steam is injected at a pressure
which is less than the fracturing pressure for the formation. As a
consequence of this initial steam injection, steam will exist out
to some radial point 17 from the well. Hot water from condensed
steam and heated formation water will extend for a further distance
into the reservoir to a radial point 18.
The configurations of the heated zones within the formation
following the injection of the initial volume of saturated steam
can perhaps be more clearly seen in FIG. 2. As shown in FIG. 2, the
portion of the formation which has been heated to steam temperature
is substantially circular in cross-section and cylindrical in
volume. The portion of the formation containing the hot water from
condensed and heated connate water 18 will form an annular ring
around the steam heated zone 17. It will be understood, of course,
that the configurations of the heated zones shown in FIG. 2 and in
subsequent FIGURES are illustrative of the process only. These
precise geometric shapes would not be realized in most instances
due to the presence of permeability streaks, faults or other
reservoir heterogeneities that would more or less distort the
heated zones from the configurations illustrated. However, the
benefits of this method will still be realized even though such
reservoir heterogeneities are present. Where the method of this
invention is used, heat can be introduced into the reservoir at a
relatively high rate and the heated regions around the well will be
more nearly cylindrical than they otherwise would have been.
After the injection of the initial volume of steam, it will
generally be preferred to shut the well in and to permit the
formation to "heat-soak." During this heat-soaking period, thermal
energy is transferred from the heated regions 17 and 18 to the rock
matrix and to the formation fluids, including oil. This heating of
the oil reduces its viscosity and makes it more susceptible to
flow.
Preferably, the well is then opened to production, and formation
fluids including the heated oil are withdrawn by means of the
tubing 15. This intermediate production step will reduce the oil
saturation within the heated regions, thus, increasing the
conductivity of these regions to subsequently injected steam.
Next, a relatively large volume of saturated steam is injected
through the tubing 15 and into the formation 10 at a pressure in
excess of that required to fracture or pressure-part the formation.
In most instances, this high pressure will, in fact, create a
fracture 19 as shown in FIG. 3. However, due to the initial steam
injection step, the resultant fracture will be less extensive than
it otherwise would have been. The initially injected steam will
reduce the viscosity of the formation oil within the heated region
and will increase the water saturation in the immediate vicinity of
the well. As a consequence, when the steam is injected at a high
pressure as a fracturing fluid it will have a tendency to rapidly
bleed or leak into the heated region and less steam is available to
pressure-part or fracture the formation. This bleeding or leak-off
will be even more pronounced where oil has been withdrawn from the
formation prior to the injection of the high pressure steam. This
intermediate production step will have the tendency of further
reducing the oil saturation within the heated regions 17 and 18 and
consequently increasing the water saturation within these regions.
Naturally, the high water saturation within the heated regions 17
and 18 will further promote bleed-off of the high pressure
steam.
The results of these steps can be seen diagramatically in FIG. 3.
The portion of the reservoir that has been heated to steam
temperature 17 has been greatly expanded due to the injection of
the large volume, high pressure step. However, the heated regions
have maintained a substantially cylindrical configuration due to
the relatively small fracture which was formed.
The advantages of this invention over the prior art methods can
perhaps be more clearly understood by comparison to FIGS. 2 and 4.
FIG. 2 (in addition to illustrating the heated regions in the
reservoir following the initial steam injection step) would be
representative of the heated regions existing within a formation in
those prior art methods where the steam injection pressure was
maintained below the point where the formation would fracture or
pressure-part. Although the heated regions shown in FIG. 2 have a
substantially cylindrical configuration, they are much less
extensive than the heated regions formed in accordance with the
teaching of this invention as illustrated in FIG. 3. FIG. 4 is
illustrative of the heated regions within a formation created in
those prior art methods where high pressure steam is injected into
the formation without the preceding low pressure steam injection
step. In this instance, the fracture 19' extends for a considerable
distance into the formation. However, the heated regions 17' and
18' do not have the more desirable cylindrical configuration; these
heated regions more nearly resemble an ellipse with a high degree
of eccentricity. The oil which exists near the tips of the extended
fracture 19' is initially heated to the point that it is capable of
flow, but due to its distance from the well, it has a tendency to
cool to the point where it will no longer flow before it can be
produced.
As was previously stated, the heated fluid which is preferred for
use in the initial and subsequent injection sequences is saturated
steam. Steam generation units which will produce saturated steam at
the pressure, temperature and quantity required for the practice of
this invention are readily and commercially available. The steam
produced by such units generally has a quality of from about 60 to
90 per cent.
The heated fluid may also be hot water or superheated steam.
However, these fluids are generally not preferred. Hot water is
less efficient than steam in transferring thermal energy to the oil
since steam can release its latent heat of vaporization as well as
its sensible heat. Superheated steam requires the use of expensive
surface equipment such as a water knockout column downstream from
the steam generator or expensive multi-pass steam generation
equipment.
Although the heated fluid in the initial and subsequent injection
sequences are preferably the same, i.e., saturated steam, these
fluids may differ. For example, the initially injected fluid may be
steam and the second injected fluid may be hot water or vice versa.
As a further example, the initial fluid may be hot water and the
subsequent fluid superheated steam.
With reference to the initial steam injection, it was previously
stated that steam would be injected at a low pressure and low
volume. The pressure employed should be less than the formation
breakdown or fracture pressure; the pressure necessary to fracture
or pressure-part a formation will be discussed in greater detail
hereinafter. At this point, it is only necessary to note that
during the initial injection step, the pressure of the steam should
be below this level.
The quantity of steam employed during the initial steam injection
step preferably should be sufficient to heat the formation to steam
temperature for a distance from about 25 to about 100 wellbore
radii from the well. One purpose of this initial steam injection
step is to heat the oil in the formation and, thus, reduce its
viscosity and to enable it to flow. The flow rate of the oil in a
radial system is dependent upon the pressure differential existing
between the formation and the well. Furthermore, most of the
pressure drop in a flowing radial system will occur very near the
wellbore due to the logarithmic variation of pressure differential
with drainage radius. For example, it has been calculated that
approximately 40 per cent of the pressure drop occurs within 25
wellbore radii from the well; approximately 60 per cent of the
pressure drop occurs within 100 wellbore radii. Muskat, Physical
Principles of Oil Production, 1949, McGraw-Hill Book Co. Inc., New
York, N.Y. Methods for determining the quantity of steam which must
be injected to heat the formation and oil to steam temperatures to
these distances are well known to those skilled in the art. See,
for example, Farouq, Ali, Marx and Langenheim's Model of Steam
Injection, Producer's Monthly, Nov. 1966, pp. 2-8.
As was previously stated, the subsequently injected steam is
injected at a high pressure and in a large volume. The injection
pressure should be at least as great as the formation breakdown or
fracture pressure. A formation is normally fractured by injecting
fluid down the well casing or tubing at rates higher than the rock
matrix will accept. This rapid injection produces a build-up in
wellbore pressure until a pressure large enough to overcome
compressive stresses within the formation and the tensile stress of
the rock matrix is reached. At this pressure, formation failure
occurs and a fracture or pressure-part is generated within the
formation. The pressure at which a formation will fracture is
dependent upon a number of variables including the tensile strength
of the rock, the rate at which the fracturing fluid will bleed into
the formation, the extent to which the oil contributes to the
competence of the formation and the like. For a given formation at
a given location, the effect of these variables and the pressure
necessary to breakdown or fracture the formation is generally well
known. In some instances where a field experience is not extensive
it may be necessary to estimate the formation breakdown pressure by
taking these variables into consideration by methods which are well
known to those skilled in the art. It is even possible to roughly
estimate the formation breakdown pressure by calculating the
overburden pressure existing at the formation. It is generally
considered that a pressure equal to from about 0.6 to about 1.0
times the overburden pressure will create a fracture.
Due to the high steam bleed-off created by the preheating of the
formation no fracture may, in fact, be formed during this
subsequent steam injection step. There may be a pressure-parting of
the formation or a fluidized zone which forms a channel of high
fluid conductivity. However, in extreme circumstances, even such a
fluidized zone may not be created due to the extreme bleed-off of
steam during the high pressure injection. Under these
circumstances, the heated region around the wellbore will be even
more nearly cylindrical than that which would be formed in the
presence of a fracture. This, of course, would be desirable since
the heated oil would have the shortest possible flow path to the
well.
The quantity of steam employed in this high pressure, large volume
step will generally be from about five to about 20 times greater on
a weight basis than that injected during the initial steam
injection step. This volume will, of course, be dependent on
reservoir conditions and existing facilities.
Following the injection of the high pressure, high volume steam the
formation will again be shut in and permitted to heat-soak.
Following this heat-soaking, the well will be returned to
production. When the production from the well declines the
formation can, of course, be restimulated by subsequent injection
of additional quantities of steam.
The principle of the invention and the best mode in which it is
contemplated to apply that principle have been described. It is to
be understood that the foregoing is illustrative only and that
other means and techniques can be employed without departing from
the true scope of the invention as defined in the following
claims.
* * * * *