U.S. patent number 3,737,686 [Application Number 05/265,933] was granted by the patent office on 1973-06-05 for shielded balanced microwave analog multiplier.
This patent grant is currently assigned to The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Navy. Invention is credited to John H. Malloy, James E. Swanekamp.
United States Patent |
3,737,686 |
Swanekamp , et al. |
June 5, 1973 |
SHIELDED BALANCED MICROWAVE ANALOG MULTIPLIER
Abstract
A passive, four quadrant, balanced analogue multiplier for use
in the micave and RF region, including four backward-wave, 3 db
quadrature couplers. The couplers are interconnected whereby four
output signals are supplied to four respective diodes of the
mulitplier from the two input signals to be multiplied for parallel
signal processing.
Inventors: |
Swanekamp; James E.
(Beltsville, MD), Malloy; John H. (Silver Spring, MD) |
Assignee: |
The United States of America as
represented by the Secretary of the Navy (Washington,
DC)
|
Family
ID: |
23012477 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/265,933 |
Filed: |
June 23, 1972 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
708/835; 333/112;
708/817; 708/840; 455/326 |
Current CPC
Class: |
G06G
7/16 (20130101); H03C 7/027 (20130101); H03C
1/58 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
G06G
7/00 (20060101); H03C 1/00 (20060101); H03C
7/02 (20060101); H03C 7/00 (20060101); H03C
1/58 (20060101); G06G 7/16 (20060101); G06g
007/16 (); G06g 007/22 () |
Field of
Search: |
;235/194,186,181
;307/229 ;328/160,144 ;324/77 ;343/1CL ;333/10,11 ;332/40,43
;325/445,446,449,22-24 ;321/60,69R,69W |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Ruggiero; Joseph F.
Claims
What is claimed as new and desired to be secured by Letters Patent
of the United States is:
1. A shielded, balanced microwave analogue multiplier comprising in
combination:
a first set of backward wave couplers having at least two ports for
receiving two sinusoidal input signals;
a second set of backward wave couplers connected to the output
ports of said first set of couplers, said second set of couplers
having four output ports and producing four output signals;
a unilaterally conducting device connected to each of said output
ports;
means for biasing said unilaterally conducting devices whereby they
operate in their square law region, and
means coupled to said unilaterally conducting device for producing
an output signal proportional to the product of the instantaneous
amplitudes of said two input signals.
2. A shielded, balanced microwave analogue multiplier according to
claim 1 wherein
said unilaterally conducting devices comprise diodes, and wherein
said biasing means comprises a d.c. bias course.
3. A shielded balanced microwave analogue multiplier according to
claim 2 wherein
each of said set of couplers comprises two backward-wave 3 db
quadrature couplers.
4. A shielded balanced microwave analogue multiplier according to
claim 3 wherein said producing means comprises:
an integrating amplifier coupled to two of said diodes;
a second integrating amplifier coupled to the other two of said
diodes; and
a differential amplifier coupled to the outputs of said integrating
amplifiers.
5. A shielded balanced microwave analogue multiplier according to
claim 3 wherein said producing means comprises:
summing resistors coupled to each of said diode outputs and a
summing integrating amplifier coupled to the other terminal of said
summing resistors.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to microwave signal processing
apparatus and, more particularly, to a shielded, balanced microwave
analogue multiplier.
In signal correlation systems, it is generally necessary to
multiply two or more input signals to form an analogue signal
representative of the product of the instantaneous amplitudes of
the respective signals. When the input signals are in the microwave
frequency range, special problems are posed and conventional audio
frequency circuits are not operative.
Prior art attempts to provide signal multiplication at microwave
frequencies include systems for heterodyning the signals down to a
low frequency range and using a conventional ring modulator as a
multiplier bridge. Heterodyning suffers from the disadvantage of
not operating at the original microwave frequencies and, thus,
requiring an excessive number of components, several of them
active.
A passive multiplier, operating at the original microwave
frequencies, is inherently unbalanced because the coaxial inputs
short out one of the four diodes in the ring modulator, causing an
undesirable d.c. bias in the output. In addition, the device is not
RF shielded beyond the coaxial inputs, thereby making possible
pick-up of undesired signals and causing deterioration of the
signal-to-noise ratio. Also, this type of device does not provide
for biasing the diodes to provide a balance adjustment and to
insure operation in the desired square-law region of the diodes,
which is required if the output is to be representative of the
product of the instantaneous amplitudes of the applied microwave
signals. Still furthermore, this type of device is not adaptable to
planar design, that is, it has crossovers, thereby precluding
certain construction techniques such as stripline, integrated RF
circuitry, or the like.
Another prior art device is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,160,882 to
John H. Malloy. This device utilized four diodes in a ring
arrangement driven by a hybrid ring into which the two signals to
be multiplied were connected as inputs. The series signal
processing in the diodes led to diode bias circuitry which was
difficult to adjust for balanced operation. In addition, the use of
the hybrid ring drive limited the frequency range over which a
single correlator could be used to about 35 10 percent.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Accordingly, one object of the invention is to provide an improved,
passive, analogue multiplier particularly suitable for operation in
the microwave frequency range.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a balanced,
microwave, analogue signal multiplier.
A still further object of the present invention is to provide an
analogue multiplier operable in the microwave frequency range
having an improved signal-to-noise ratio.
Yet another object of the instant invention is to provide a
microwave signal multiplier with total electromagnetic
shielding.
Still another object of the present invention is to provide an
analogue signal multiplier adaptable to miniature microwave planar
construction.
A still further object of the present invention is to provide an
analogue multiplier having a large usable frequency range.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a simpler
diode biasing arrangement and better isolation in an analogue
signal multiplier.
Briefly, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention, these
and other objects are attained by providing a shielded, balanced,
analogue signal multiplier operable at the microwave frequency
range utilizing four backward-wave, 3 db, quadrature couplers
connected in such a way as to take two input signals and provide
four output signals. These four output signals from the coupler
drive network are applied to four parallel diodes of the
multiplier, each separately driven into their square law regions.
Their output is then processed through integrating amplifiers and a
differential amplifier whose output represents the product of the
instantaneous amplitudes of the original input signals.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
A more complete appreciation of the invention, and many of the
attendant advantages thereof, will be readily appreciated as the
same becomes better understood by reference to the following
description, when considered in connection with the accompanying
drawings wherein:
FIG. 1 is a schematic view of one embodiment of the analogue
multiplier according to the present invention, and
FIG. 2 is a schematic view of an alternative embodiment of the
analogue multiplier according to the present invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFFERED EMBODIMENT
The operation of correlation is multiplication followed by time
averaging. The correlation function is an even function with
respect to the relative time delay between the two input signals to
be correlated, with a maximum value at zero relative delay between
two input signals, i.e., the correlator, when operating on two
signal phasors, must perform the scalar, or "dot" product of the
two input voltage phasors. Thus, with two sinusoidal input signals
of the form E.sub.1 cos .omega..sub.1 t and E.sub.2 cos
.omega..sub.1 (t + .tau.), the correct correlation multiplication
must produce the product of the two signal magnitudes times the
cosine of the phase angle between the two input signals, i.e.,
E.sub.1 E.sub.2 cos .omega..sub.1 .tau..
Referring now to FIG. 1, sinusoidal input signal E.sub.1 cos
.omega..sub.1 t is applied to "input" port 10 of backward wave
coupler 14 and sinusoidal input signal E.sub.2 cos .omega..sub.1 (t
+ .tau.) is applied to "input" port 12 of backward wave coupler 16.
The "isolated" ports of couplers 14 and 16 are terminated in their
characteristic impedances 18 and 20, respectively. The input power
is split equally between the two output ports of each coupler
whereby a voltage of E.sub.1 /.sqroot. 2 (cos .omega..sub.1 t -
90.degree.) appears at "coupled" output port 22 and a voltage of
E.sub.1 /.sqroot. 2 cos .omega..sub.1 t appears at "transmitted"
output port 24 of coupler 12. Similarly, a voltage of E.sub.2
/.sqroot. 2 cos (.omega..sub.1 t + .omega..sub.1 .tau. -
90.degree.) appears at "coupled" output port 26 and a voltage of
E.sub.2 /.sqroot. 2 cos .omega..sub.1 (t + .tau.) appears at
"transmitted" output port 27 of coupler 16. These four output
voltages are then coupled to the "input" and "isolated" ports 32,
34, 36, and 38 of couplers 28 and 30 in the following manner:
"Coupled" port 22 connected to "input" port 36, "transmitted" port
24 connected to "input" port 32, "coupled" port 26 connected to
"isolated" port 34, and "transmitted" port 27 connected to
"isolated" port 38. For voltages connected to the "input" ports 32
and 36, the output supplied is 1/.sqroot.2 times the input voltage
with a 0.degree. phase shift at the "transmitted" output port, and
a 90.degree. phase shift at the "coupled" port, as was the case
with couplers 12 and 16. With voltages fed into the "isolated"
ports 34 and 38, the 0.degree. phase shift is associated with the
output voltage at the "coupled" port and 90.degree. associated with
the "transmitted" port. Superposition is then used to sum the
voltage at the output ports 40, 42, 44 and 46 due to voltage inputs
at ports 32, 34, 36 and 38. Thus, the outputs
v.sub.1 = (E.sub.1 /2) cos (.omega..sub.1 t - 90.degree.) +
(E.sub.2 /2) cos (.omega..sub.1 t + .omega..sub.1 .tau. -
90.degree.)
v.sub.2 = (E.sub.1 /2) cos .omega..sub.1 t + (E.sub.2 /2) cos
(.omega..sub.1 t + .omega..sub.1 .tau. - 180.degree.)
v.sub.3 = (E.sub.1 /2) cos (.omega..sub.1 t - 180.degree.) +
(E.sub.2 /2) cos (.omega..sub.1 t +.omega..sub.1 .tau.)
v.sub.4 = (E.sub.1 /2) cos (.omega..sub.1 t - 90.degree.) +
(E.sub.2 /2) cos (.omega..sub.1 t +.omega..sub.1 .tau. -
90.degree.)
appear at output ports 40, 42, 44 and 46, respectively.
While there are 4! (24) distinct possible ways or sets of
connecting the four output voltages from ouplers 14 and 16 to the
four inputs of couplers 28 and 30, there are three characteristic
classes of eight output voltage sets from couplers 28 and 30. Only
one of these three classes contains the 0.degree. and 180.degree.
relative phase relationship between the two input voltage terms
appearing in each of the four output voltage v.sub.1, v.sub.2,
v.sub.3 and v.sub.4. The interconnection shown in FIG. 1 and
described hereinabove is only one of these eight possible
combinations and should not be construed to be the only one
possible.
Output voltages v.sub.1, v.sub.2, v.sub.3 and v.sub.4 are then
processed in hot carrier diodes 48, 50, 52 and 54 respectively,
each of these diodes operating in its square law (i = Kv.sup.2)
region, i.e., that the diode bias and its input signal voltage
amplitude are such as to assure this operation. The functional
relationship of the hot carrier diodes obeys Schottky theory almost
exactly and may be expressed as
i = I.sub.o (e .sup..alpha..sup.v - 1)
where i is the current through the diode, v is the voltage across
the diode, I.sub.o is the diode saturation current, and .alpha. is
a diode constant. With the diode forwardly biased at a voltage
v.sub.1 and a current I.sub.b, a small a.c. signal voltage v.sub.s
applied around this bias point produces an output signal current
of
I.sub.s = (I.sub.b + I.sub.o) (e .sup..alpha..sup.v - 1) behaving
like an ideal square law device.
Referring back to FIG. 1, an adjustable d.c. bias 56, 58, 60 and 62
is provided for each diode 48, 50, 52 and 54, respectively, through
resistors 64, 66, 68 and 70, respectively. Reactive impedance
elements, such as chokes 72, 74, 76 and 78, provide d.c. return
paths for diodes 48, 50, 52 and 54, respectively. The outputs from
diodes 48, 50, 52 and 54, operating in their square law regions,
are
e.sub.on = k[ .alpha. v.sub.n + (.alpha..sup.2 /2) v.sub.n.sup.2 ],
n = 1, 2, 3, 4
RF shunt capacitors 80, 82, 84 and 86, at each diode output 48, 50,
52 and 54, respectively, ground the RF signal component centered
around frequencies .omega..sub.1 and 2 .omega..sub.1, so that
e.sub.on need include only the d.c. terms and quasi d.c. component
centered around .omega.= 0 (in the case of a dynamic system). As an
example, consider the diode voltage v.sub.1 appearing at the input
of diode 48 where
v.sub.1 = (E.sub.1 /2) cos (.omega..sub.1 t - 90.degree.) +
(E.sub.2 /2) cos (.omega..sub.1 t + .omega..sub.1 .tau. -
90.degree.)
v.sub.1 = (E.sub.1 /2) sin .omega..sub.1 t + (E.sub.2 /2) sin
(.omega..sub.1 t +.omega..sub.1 .tau.)
Substituting into the equation for e.sub.on,
e.sub.o1 = K.alpha.(E.sub.1 /2) sin .omega..sub.1 t +
K.alpha.(E.sub.2 /2) sin (.omega..sub.1 t + .omega..sub.1 .tau.) +
K.alpha. .sup.2 (E.sub.1.sup.2 /8) sin.sup.2 .omega..sub.1 t +
K.alpha. .sup.2 (E.sub.2.sup.2 /8) sin.sup.2 (.omega..sub.1 t +
.omega..sub.1 .tau.) + K.alpha. .sup.2 (E.sub.1 E.sub.2 /4) sin
.omega..sub.1 t sin (.omega..sub.1 t + .omega..sub.1 .tau.) ,
e.sub.o1 = K.alpha.(E.sub.1 /2) sin .omega..sub.1 t +
K.alpha.(E.sub.2 /2) sin (.omega..sub.1 t + .omega..sub.1 .tau.) +
K.alpha. .sup.2 (E.sub.1.sup.2 /16) [1 - cos 2.omega..sub.1 t] +
K.alpha. .sup.2 (E.sub.2.sup.2 /16) [1 - cos (2.omega..sub.1 t +
2.omega..sub.1 .tau.)] + K.alpha. .sup.2 (E.sub.1 E.sub.2 /8) [cos
.omega..sub.1 .tau. - cos (2.omega..sub.1 t + .omega..sub.1
.tau.)].
After bypassing all .omega..sub.1 t and 2.omega..sub.1 t components
through shunt capacitor 80,
e.sub.o1 = (K.alpha..sup.2 /8) [ (E.sub.1.sup.2 /2) +
(E.sub.2.sup.2 /2) + E.sub.1 E.sub.2 cos .omega..sub.1 .tau.]
Similarly,
e.sub.o2 = (K.alpha..sup.2 /8) [E.sub.1.sup.2 /2) + (E.sub.2.sup.2
/2) - E.sub.1 E.sub.2 cos .omega..sub.1 .tau.]
and
e.sub.o3 = e.sub.o2
and
e.sub.o4 = e.sub.o1
Thus, e.sub.o1, e.sub.o2, e.sub.o3, and e.sub.o4 contain only d.c.
and quasi d.c. terms remaining for further signal processing. The
outputs from diodes 48 and 50, e.sub.o1 and e.sub.o2, respectively,
are supplied to the input of integrating amplifier 88, and the
outputs of diodes 52 and 54, e.sub.o3 and e.sub.o4, respectively,
are supplied to the input of integrating amplifier 90. The outputs
of integrating amplifiers 88 and 90 then form the inputs of
differential amplifier 92 whose output is readily seen to be
e.sub.out = K [(e.sub.o1 - e.sub.o2) - (e.sub.o3 - e.sub.o4)]
e.sub.out = K.sub.o E.sub.1 E.sub.2 cos .omega..sub.1 .tau.
or
e.sub.out = K.sub.o R (.tau.), where
R (.tau.) = E.sub.1 E.sub.2 cos .omega..sub.1 .tau., the
correlation function.
In an alternative embodiment, shown in FIG. 2, the multiplication
process is performed identically with the four 3 db hybrid couplers
and the four biased, hot carrier diodes previously illustrated and
explained with respect to FIG. 1. The four output voltages
e.sub.o1, e.sub.o2, e.sub.o3, and e.sub.o4 from diodes 48, 50, 52
and 54, respectively, are the same as before, but rather than
supplying them to integrating and differential amplifiers, voltages
e.sub.o1 and e.sub.o2 are added in resistors 94 and 96,
respectively, and voltages e.sub.o3 and e.sub.o4 are added in
resistors 98 and 100, respectively. These two summing voltages are
then supplied as the input to summing integrating amplifier 102,
whose output e.sub.out is also of the form K.sub.o E.sub.1 E.sub.2
cos .omega..sub.1 .tau..
It is to be particularly noted that the entire device, except for
the d.c. bias sources, is totally shielded from external
electromagnetic radiation and stray RF signals. The ability of the
instant invention to provide a completely shielded system is a
distinct advantage over the prior art which, heretofore, has been
unable to completely shield the multipliers. Thus, the prior art
multiplier had been forced to sacrifice either shielding, which is
important at microwave frequencies, or a balanced system, which is
advantageous in operation, or both.
The microwave multiplier will provide simple and reliable analogue
multiplication at microwave frequqneics. By providing true balance
and complete shielding, a significant increase in signal-to-noise
ratio over prior art devices may be obtained.
It is readily apparent that any transmission line made may be
utilized to fabricate the multiplier. Thus, coaxial cable,
stripline, waveguide and miniature microwave planar fabrication may
be utilized. Furthermore, any desired shielding may be used.
The four outputs from the coupler drive network enable the four
diodes of the multiplier to be each separately driven, thereby
utilizing parallel signal processing which permit better isolation
of the diodes and a simple, easily adjustable biasing arrangement.
In addition, the use of backward-wave couplers gives the coupler
drive network an octave band frequency range capability, i.e., .+-.
33.3 percent frequency range. This means that less correlators are
required to cover a given broad frequency range, or a broader
usable frequency range is available from each correlator. A
continuously variable delay at one of the inputs can generate a
complete correlation function.
Obviously, numerous modifications and variations of the present
invention are possible in light of the above teachings. Thus, as an
alternative to using backward wave couplers, 3 db line couplers may
be used in the coupler drive network. Seven other combinations for
interconnecting the couplers to implement the doubly balanced
correlator concept will become obvious as other alternatives to the
proposed embodiment. It is therefore to be understood that, within
the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced
otherwise than as specifically described herein .
* * * * *