U.S. patent number 3,721,362 [Application Number 05/070,869] was granted by the patent office on 1973-03-20 for double wall corrugated lng tank.
This patent grant is currently assigned to John J. McMullen Associates, Inc.. Invention is credited to Thomas F. Bridges, George R. Knight, Jr., Ivan Mertl.
United States Patent |
3,721,362 |
Bridges , et al. |
March 20, 1973 |
DOUBLE WALL CORRUGATED LNG TANK
Abstract
A double wall tank for the marine transportation of liquefied
natural gases at atmospheric pressure and cryogenic temperature,
the tank having its primary and secondary barriers supported in
such a way that the respective barrier supports are in alignment.
The walls of the inventive tank, in its preferred embodiment, are
corrugated in a horizontal direction. All liquid-tight welds are
either butt or seam welds, and all transitions between the walls of
the tank are smooth, without intermediate box girders. A plurality
of vertical webs support the primary barrier of the tank; and a
plurality of diaphragms, intermediate the primary and secondary
barriers, are positioned in alignment with the vertical webs and
support the secondary barrier. The vertical webs are stabilized by
lightweight channel-shaped struts; corner plates support the
corners of the tank and serve as base members for the struts. The
tank is supported and keyed at the bottom only, thereby reducing
the load transmitted to the structure of the ship near the top of
the tank.
Inventors: |
Bridges; Thomas F. (Port
Washington, NY), Knight, Jr.; George R. (Port Washington,
NY), Mertl; Ivan (Greenwich, CT) |
Assignee: |
John J. McMullen Associates,
Inc. (New York, NY)
|
Family
ID: |
22097861 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/070,869 |
Filed: |
September 9, 1970 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
220/560.06;
114/74A; 220/670; 220/901; 220/694; 220/DIG.29 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B63B
25/16 (20130101); Y10S 220/29 (20130101); Y10S
220/901 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
B63B
25/16 (20060101); B63B 25/00 (20060101); B65d
025/18 () |
Field of
Search: |
;220/15,9LG,71,72,83,10,1B,22,16 ;62/45 ;114/74A |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
555,624 |
|
Sep 1957 |
|
BE |
|
1,054,641 |
|
Jan 1967 |
|
GB |
|
Primary Examiner: Leclair; Joseph R.
Assistant Examiner: Garrett; James R.
Claims
We claim:
1. A double wall cargo tank for the marine transportation of
liquefied gases, such as methane and the like, at atmospheric
pressure and at cryogenic temperature, the cargo tank comprising:
an inner wall having corrugations defined therein, said inner wall
defining a first liquid-tight enclosure; an outer wall having
corrugations defined therein, spaced from and enclosing said inner
wall, said outer wall defining a second liquid-tight enclosure; a
wall space defined between said inner and said outer walls, said
inner and said outer walls being arranged so that their undulations
projecting into the wall space are aligned and in opposed relation
perpendicularly of the planess of the walls and their undulations
projecting out of the wall space are aligned and in opposed
relation perpendicularly of the planess of the walls; a plurality
of webs rigidly connected to said corrugated inner wall, extending
into the tank defined by said inner wall a substantial portion of
the transverse dimensions of the tank defined by said inner wall,
said webs extending transversely of said inner wall corrugations
and serving to support said inner wall; a plurality of diaphragms,
each rigidly connected both to said inner and said outer walls,
each having its plane positioned within said wall space, and each
being aligned with the plane of a respective web, said diaphragms
serving to support said outer wall; and means for stabilizing the
portions of said webs extending into the tank defined by the inner
wall including a plurality of struts, each of said struts extending
perpendicularly and being rigidly connected to the innermost region
of selected ones of said webs.
2. The cargo tank defined in claim 1, and further comprising a
plurality of spaced longitudinal girders rigidly connected to the
bottom of said cargo tank and serving to transmit foundation loads
into the tank structures.
3. The cargo tank defined in claim 1, and further comprising entry
means for gaining access to said wall space.
4. The cargo tank recited in claim 1, wherein the corrugations on
the tank bottom are of a depth different than the corrugations in
the tank top and sides.
5. The cargo tank defined in claim 1, wherein said cargo tank is
mounted in the hold of a ship, and further comprising: support
members for supporting the cargo tank only at the bottom
thereof.
6. The cargo tank recited in claim 5, wherein said support members
serve the dual function of supporting and keying said tank.
7. The cargo tank recited in claim 5, and further comprising
anti-floating chocks for preventing the tank from rising in its
hold if said hold should become flooded.
8. The cargo tank recited in claim 1, wherein the corrugations in
the tank side walls are horizontally oriented.
9. The cargo tank recited in claim 8, wherein said webs and said
diaphragms are vertically oriented.
10. The cargo tank recited in claim 1, and further comprising: a
longitudinal bulkhead dividing the cargo tank into two sections of
equal volume; and a transverse swash bulkhead dividing the cargo
tank into two sections of approximately equal volume; said
longitudinal and transverse bulkheads, together, dividing the cargo
tank into four compartments of equal volume.
11. The cargo tank recited in claim 10, wherein said bulkheads are
corrugated.
12. The cargo tank recited in claim 10, wherein both the
longitudinal and the transverse bulkheads are provided with a
plurality of openings therein, these openings providing
communication between each of said four compartments of equal
volume.
13. The cargo tank recited in claim 12, wherein the minimum spacing
between the inner and the outer walls of said cargo tank permits
the passage of a workman for purposes of inspection.
14. The cargo tank recited in claim 1, wherein the transitions
between the top, sides and bottom of said tank are smooth
transitions.
15. The cargo tank defined in claim 14, wherein the corrugations in
the top of the tank are oriented in the same direction as are the
corrugations in the bottom of the tank.
16. The cargo tank defined in claim 14, wherein all welds in both
the inner and the outer walls are either seam welds or butt
welds.
17. The cargo tank recited in claim 14, wherein certain of the
transitions between the tank sides and the tank top and bottom
comprise: a pair of smoothly curved plates associated,
respectively, with said inner and said outer walls and adapted to
rigidly connect the tank sides to the associated tank top or tank
bottom; a pair of taper regions associated, respectively, with said
inner and said outer walls in the tank top or the tank bottom
wherein the corrugated inner and outer walls are tapered into flat
plates, the spacing between the flat plates in said taper regions
being equal to the maximum spacing between the corrugated inner and
outer walls; said smoothly curved plates each being connected, at
one side, to a respective flat plate in a taper region, and, at the
other side, to the associated tank sides at an area of maximum
spacing between the corrugated inner and outer walls.
18. The cargo tank recited in claim 14, wherein certain of the
transitions between the tank sides and the tank top and bottom
comprise: a pair of smoothly curved plates associated,
respectively, with said inner and said outer walls and adapted to
rigidly connect the tank sides to the associated tank top or tank
bottom; a first pair of taper regions associated, respectively,
with said inner and said outer walls in the tank top or the tank
bottom wherein the corrugated inner and outer walls are tapered
into flat plates, the spacing between the flat plates in said taper
regions being equal to the maximum spacing between the corrugated
inner and outer walls; a second pair of taper regions associated,
respectively, with said inner and said outer walls in the tank
sides wherein the corrugated inner and outer walls are tapered into
flat plates, the spacing between the flat plates in said taper
regions being equal to the maximum spacing between the corrugated
inner and outer walls; said smoothly curved plates each being
connected, at one side, to a respective flat plate in said first
pair of taper regions, and, at the other side, to a respective flat
plate in said second pair of taper regions.
19. The cargo tank recited in claim 14, wherein certain of the
transitions between the tank sides and the tank top and bottom
comprise: a pair of smoothly curved plates associated,
respectively, with said inner and said outer walls and adapted to
rigidly connect the tank sides to the associated tank top or tank
bottom; said smoothly curved plates each being connected, at one
side, to a wall of the associated tank side at an area of maximum
spacing between the corrugated inner and outer walls, and, at the
other side, to a wall of the associated tank top or bottom at an
area of maximum spacing between the corrugated inner and outer
walls.
20. The cargo tank defined in claim 14 wherein certain of the
transitions between the tank sides and between the tank sides and
the tank top and bottom comprise:
corrugation transition pieces each rigidly connected, respectively,
to an inner and an outer side wall of the tank; cylindrical
cylindrical vertical corner pieces of arcuate transverse cross
section rigidly connected between respective pairs of said
transition pieces that are rigidly connected to adjacent sides of
the tank;
cylindrical horizontal corner pieces of arcuate transverse cross
section, each connected, respectively, between an inner and an
outer wall of the tank sides and an inner and an outer wall of the
tank top and bottom; and
additional corner pieces connected between respective ones of said
vertical corner pieces and said horizontal corner pieces.
21. The cargo tank as in claim 20 wherein said additional corner
pieces each define a smooth surface defining one-eighth of a
sphere.
22. The cargo tank as in claim 20 wherein said corrugation
transition pieces each define along its length a series of
transverse channel-shaped members of varying depth defined by a
first trapezoidal-shaped surface, first and second
triangular-shaped surfaces connected to said first
trapizoidal-shaped surface, and first and second rectangular-shaped
surfaces connected, respectively, to said first and second
triangular-shaped surfaces.
23. The cargo tank as in claim 22 wherein said triangular-shaped
surfaces and said rectangular-shaped surfaces are coplanar with
predetermined portions of said tank sides.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 732,009, now U.S.
Pat. No. 3,670,517, a streamlined continuation of its parent
application filed on Mar. 16, 1965, assigned to the present
assignee, a double wall corrugated tank for the marine
transportation of liquefied natural gases is disclosed. In this
patent application the corrugations in the side walls of the tank
are vertically oriented while the corrugations in the top and
bottom walls of the tank are horizontally oriented. Four box
girders are provided at the top of the tank and four similar box
girders are provided at the bottom of the tank. The top, bottom and
side walls of the tank, with their corrugations, are T-welded to
the respective box girders. The walls of the tank are supported and
stabilized by internal vertical webs, between-wall diaphragms and
horizontal stringers.
Because of its design, the tank disclosed in the above-noted
copending patent application has numerous drawbacks. First, since a
large number of T-welds appear both in the primary and secondary
barriers, liquid-tight construction becomes a difficult task. The
T-weld is not easily made liquid-tight; and a radiographic leak
detection procedure is correspondingly difficult. In addition, the
T-welds result in local points of stress concentration. And,
further, the need for box girder systems adds both to the weight
and the cost of the cargo tank.
In this copending patent application, the secondary barrier of the
disclosed tank is supported by a plurality of diaphragm plates; and
the primary barrier is supported by a number of vertical webs. To
stabilize the vertical webs, a plurality of horizontal stringers is
provided. This construction, while effective, tends to be overly
complex and, because of its complexity, tends to be somewhat
heavy.
In many of the tanks known to the prior art, the supporting
function and the keying function are performed by distinct
structures. Further, the tanks are often supported at a number of
positions around its periphery. Such arrangements, it has been
found, tend to be somewhat uneconomical and overly complex. In
addition, it has been found that the tank loads have often been
transmitted to the structure of the ship near the top of the tank,
thereby causing stress in the ship structure.
It is toward the elimination of the above-noted drawbacks which
exist in the tanks known to the prior art that the present
invention is directed.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to a double wall tank for the marine
transportation of liquefied natural gases at atmospheric pressure
and cryogenic temperature. The inventive tank is corrugated
throughout, and has many economic advantages over those tanks known
to the prior art.
With the corrugated tank of the present invention, smooth
transitions between tank walls are provided. In this manner, all
T-welds and each of the problems associated therewith are avoided.
The elements of the inventive tank, both in the primary and
secondary barriers, are either butt welded or are seam welded.
Therefore, the welds may more easily be made liquid-tight. And,
because of the smooth transitions without T-welds, the conventional
points of high stress concentration have been eliminated. Further,
butt and seam welds may readily be checked for liquid-tight
operation by the use of radiographic techniques; as noted above,
radiographic analysis is quite difficult with T-welds. In the
preferred embodiment of the inventive tank, all of the walls have
their corrugations aligned in the horizontal direction.
In the horizontally corrugated embodiment of the double wall tank
forming a part of the present invention, the primary barrier is
supported by a plurality of vertical webs located within the
primary barrier. Diaphragms are positioned intermediate the primary
and secondary barriers, and in alignment with the vertical support
the secondary barrier. With the vertical webs and the diaphragms so
aligned, the need for horizontal stringers is eliminated. As a
result, there is a large potential weight savings. However, to
ensure proper stabilization of the inner flanges of the vertical
webs, relatively lightweight channel-shaped struts are provided.
But even with these struts, there is a substantial savings in
weight when comparing the tank of the present invention with the
tank disclosed in the above-referenced copending patent
application.
While the corrugations are preferably aligned horizontally, the
present invention contemplates that they may be vertically aligned
as well. Then, rather than using vertical webs as the primary
support members, horizontal stringers would be used. The present
invention then involves aligning the diaphragm plates horizontally
with the horizontal stringers.
The inventive tank is supported and keyed in place from the bottom
only. This, in comparing the inventive tank with tanks known to the
prior art, is quite simple in design and greatly reduces the loads
introduced into the structure of the ship near the top of the
tank.
In a first embodiment, the tank of the present invention has
enlarged rounded corners providing access between the primary and
secondary barriers. This access facilitates inspection and repair
of the two liquid-tight barriers. In a second embodiment, the space
between the primary and secondary barriers is large enough to
provide access in a direction perpendicular to the horizontal
corrugations. This second embodiment, while decreasing the carrying
capacity of the tank, may be found to be more economical in the end
due to the ease of construction gained by such a configuration and
the ease with which inspection may be accomplished.
Accordingly, it is the main object of the present invention to
provide a double wall tank for the marine transportation of
liquefied natural gases at atmospheric pressure and cryogenic
temperature, which tank is constructed with relative ease, which is
light in weight, and which is quite strong.
Another object of the invention is to provide a double wall cargo
tank whose weight is reduced by the elimination of the need for
heavy support and stabilization members.
Still another object of the invention is to provide a double wall
cargo tank whose support and stabilization members are in
alignment, thereby enhancing the effects of these members.
Yet a further object of the invention is to provide a double wall
corrugated cargo tank having smooth between-wall transitions and
eliminating the need for T-welds.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a double
wall corrugated tank having maximum strength with a minimum number
of structural elements.
A further object of the present invention is to provide a double
wall corrugated tank requiring no horizontal stringers for purposes
of strength.
Still a further object of the present invention is to provide a
corrugated tank which is supported and keyed on the bottom
only.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a double wall
corrugated tank wherein ready access is provided between the walls
of the tank.
A further object of the present invention is to provide a double
wall corrugated tank wherein access between the walls tank is
provided in a direction parallel to the corrugations.
Still another object of the present invention is to provide a
double wall corrugated tank wherein access is provided between the
walls of the tank in a direction transverse to the corrugation.
Yet a further object of the present invention is to provide a
horizontally corrugated cargo tank having the qualities recited
above.
These and other objects of the present invention, as well as many
of the attendant advantages thereof, will become more readily
apparent when reference is made to the following description taken
in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a side elevation, partially in section, of a ship
equipped with a cargo tank constructed in accordance with the
teachings of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a vertical cross-section of the inventive tank taken
along line 2--2 of FIG. 3;
FIG. 3 is a horizontal cross-section of the inventive tank taken
along line 3--3 of FIG. 2;
FIG. 4 is a cross-section of the inventive tank taken along line
4--4 of FIG. 3;
FIG. 5 is a cross-section taken along line 5--5 of FIG. 3;
FIG. 6 is a cross-section of a corrugated wall of the inventive
tank taken along line 6--6 of FIG. 5;
FIG. 7 is a cross-section taken along line 7--7 of FIG. 6;
FIG. 8(a) is a cross-section showing the top and side wall
corrugations;
FIG. 8(b) is a cross-section showing the deeper tank bottom
corrugations;
FIG. 9 is a cross-section through line 9--9 of FIG. 2; and
FIG. 10 is a perspective view showing the corner construction of
the inventive tank.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
With reference first to FIG. 1, a ship equipped with a plurality of
cargo tanks constructed in accordance with the teachings of the
present invention is shown generally at 10 with a portion of the
hull 12 cut away to expose a number of cargo tanks 14 (only two
being shown). As is customary in the field of marine transportation
of cryogenic fluids, it is contemplated that a large number of
cargo tanks be provided in the holds of the ship 10. The tanks 14
are located below the deck 16 of the ship 10 and are entirely
surrounded by a layer of insulation 18, this insulation, for
example, taking the form of a number of foam blocks. As shown in
FIG. 1, the layer of insulation 18 is affixed to the outer wall of
the tanks 14; however, this insulation may be affixed to the inner
hull of the ship or spaced between the inner hull of the ship and
the outer wall of the tank.
The ship 10 is of the double hull variety, as seen in FIG. 3, the
hull 12 being defined by an outer hull 20 and an inner hull 22.
And, as seen in FIG. 1, the bottom of the ship is defined by an
outer bottom 24 and an inner bottom 26. Between the inner bottom 26
of the ship 10 and the bottom of the tank 14, a plurality of keying
and foundation members 28 are illustrated. Anti-floatation chocks
30, located between transverse bulkheads 32 and the tanks 14,
harness the upward movement of the tanks 14 in the event that the
cargo hold should flood.
Now, with particular reference to FIGS. 2 through 4, the
construction of an embodiment of the inventive tank will be
described. The cargo tank 14, as noted above, is of the double wall
variety. The primary barrier, or internal wall, is represented at
34 and the secondary barrier, or external wall, is represented at
36. The tank has a bottom 38, a top 40, a pair of internal sides 42
and 44, respectively, adjacent the transverse bulkheads 32, and a
pair of external sides, only one being shown at 46, adjacent the
inner hull 22. As is evident from the figures, both the internal
wall 34 and the external wall 36 of the tank 14 are corrugated, and
are corrugated in the horizontal direction.
A corrugated longitudinal liquid-tight bulkhead 48 extends the
entire distance between and supports the inner sides 42 and 44 of
the tank 14, and a corrugated transverse swash bulkhead 50 extends
between and supports the outer sides of the tank 14. In this
manner, the longitudinal liquid-tight bulkhead 48 and the
transverse swash bulkhead 50 divide the tank 14 into four
substantially equal volumes.
A number of vertical webs 52, positioned both in the longitudinal
and transverse directions, extend into the body of the tank 14 and
serve to support the primary barrier or internal wall 34 thereof. A
number of vertically oriented diaphragms 54 are welded both to the
inner wall 34 and the outer wall 36, are positioned in alignment
with the vertical webs 52 and support the secondary barrier 36.
In the described embodiment of the inventive tank, with the
corrugations oriented in the horizontal direction and with the
vertical webs positioned in alignment with the vertical diaphragms,
the horizontal stringers required in the cargo tank disclosed in
the above-noted copending U.S. patent application become
unnecessary. In the copending patent application, with the side
wall corrugations oriented in a vertical direction, and with the
vertical webs and diaphragms positioned as there shown, the
vertical webs and diaphragms did little to stabilize the tank in
the horizontal direction. With the side walls of the tank
corrugated in a horizontal direction, and with the webs and
diaphragms aligned, on the other hand, as in the presently
described tank, horizontal stabilization is inherent. Therefore,
the customary horizontal stringers may be eliminated, the
construction of the described horizontally corrugated cargo tank is
less complex than that associated with the vertically corrugated
cargo tanks known to the prior art and, as a consequence, the
weight of the inventive tank is less than the weight of the known
tanks.
As noted in the preceding paragraph, the horizontal corrugations
and the alignment of the webs and diaphragms in the cargo tank
described and illustrated herein eliminate the need for heavy
horizontal stringers. However, even with the inventive tank, the
innermost flanges of the vertical webs must be stabilized. As shown
in the figures, these flanges are stabilized by a plurality of
horizontal channel-shaped struts 56. Since the horizontal stringers
disclosed in the above-referenced copending U.S. application serve
the function of stabilizing the tank walls in a horizontal
direction, and since the struts 56 serve only the function of
stabilizing the vertical webs, it should be evident that the
strength of the struts 56 need not be as great as the strength of
the horizontal stringers required in the prior art tanks.
Therefore, the horizontally corrugated cargo tank forming a part of
the present invention is lighter in weight than the cargo tanks
known to the prior art.
In FIGS. 3, 5, 6 and 7, the areas of intersection between the
vertical webs and the longitudinal and transverse bulkheads are
shown. First, it should be noted that the innermost regions of the
vertical webs are provided with flanges 58, these flanges serving
as stays for preventing excessive deflexion in their associated
webs 52. It is the flanges, or stays which support the U-shaped
channels 56.
The vertical webs 52, in the areas of intersection with the
corrugated bulkheads 48 and 50, are broken and are welded to the
respective bulkheads. Horizontal triangular plating members 60 are
welded to the bulkheads 48 and 50, to the vertical webs 52 and to
the flanges 58 extending from the vertical webs. As seen in FIGS. 2
and 3, the triangular plating members 60 are spaced, in a vertical
direction, along the bulkheads 48 and 50.
The elements of the inventive tank are further stabilized by a
series of horizontally oriented plating members located at critical
areas in the tank. As seen in FIG. 3, these support members take
the form of mid-tank plating elements 62 stabilizing the bulkheads
48 and 50 at their line of intersection, corner plating elements 64
stabilizing the tank at its corners, and side plating elements 66
serving to stabilize the bulkheads 48 and 50 at the lines of
intersection with the sides of the tank.
As seen in FIGS. 5 through 7, the transverse swash bulkhead 50 is
provided with a set of bulkhead openings 70, these openings
reducing the undesirable splashing of the cargo during the voyage
of the ship. The longitudinal bulkhead 48 may, if desired, be
provided with a set of openings aligned and positioned so as to
provide roll stabilization for the ship when the tanks are charged
with cargo.
As seen in FIGS. 4 and 8, the diaphragms 54 are also provided with
openings, these being shown at 72, positioned at the widest regions
between the corrugations defining the inner and outer walls of the
tank. The openings 72 are important in that they provide means for
physical communication between areas defined by the diaphragms 54.
If the openings were not provided, there would be no available
access for purposes of inspecting the primary and secondary
barriers of the tank.
Additional strength is provided by a plurality of longitudinal
girders 74 extending along the tank 14 and welded to the bottom
wall thereof. The function of the girders 74 is to transmit
foundation loads into the tank structure.
Now, with reference to FIGS. 1 through 4, the support and alignment
of the tank 14 will be explained. As noted previously, the tank 14
is provided with anti-floatation chocks 30 serving to prevent the
tank from rising in its hold in the event that the hold should
flood. As seen in the figures, each anti-floatation chock 30 is
defined by a flange 76 attached to and extending from the
respective side wall of the tank 14, and a flange 78, aligned with
the flange 76, welded to the respective liquid-tight bulkhead 32
defining the cargo holds. As seen best in FIG. 2, a small space is
provided between the flanges 76 and 78, this space preventing
contact between the elements of the anti-floatation chocks 30 under
all conditions save for hold flooding. The chocks 30 in no way add
to the support of the tank 14.
As is evident from the figures, the tank is supported only at its
bottom, the tank-supporting structures serving also as keying
elements. With more particular reference to FIGS. 2 and 4, the
combination keying and supporting elements will be described. A
number of pedestals 80 are fixedly attached to the inner bottom 26
of the ship. And, adapted to associate with the pedestals 80, a
number of wooden insulating blocks 82, as of balsa or fir, are
attached to the outer wall 36 of the tank 14, at the bottom
thereof. The combination of the pedestals 80 and the insulating
blocks 82 make up tank foundations which transmit the loads exerted
by the tank to the structure of the ship. Due to the extreme
temperature changes experienced by the tank, with its resulting
contractions and expansions, the pedestals 80 and the insulating
blocks 82 are associated in such a manner so as to allow sliding
contact therebetween.
It is important that the cargo tanks remain in relatively fixed
positions within their respective holds. Naturally, because of the
contractions and expansions experienced by the cargo tanks, they
must be fixed in a special manner. In the inventive tank, three
lines of foundations are provided. Two lines are provided at the
tank bottom near the hull of the ship, and the third line of
foundation is provided along the center line of the ship, each line
of foundation being oriented in a longitudinal direction. These
foundations ensure that the tanks are held relatively fixed within
their respective holds, allowing, of course, for expansion and
contraction.
As seen most clearly in FIG. 4, a keying arrangement is provided at
the central region of the tank. This keying arrangement takes the
form of a number of transverse keys 84 rigidly secured to the inner
bottom 26 of the ship and a number of transverse keys 86 rigidly
secured to the outer wall 36 of the tank 14. As seen in this
figure, the directions of the transverse keys are made to
alternate. In this manner, the insulation block 82 serves the dual
function of insulating the tank 14 from the hull of the ship and
also insulating the tank keys 86 from the ship keys 84. For a full
disclosure of this keying arrangement the attention of the reader
is directed to U.S. Pat. No. 3,428,205, issued Feb. 18, 1969, and
assigned to the present assignee.
As will be readily apparent when viewing FIGS. 2, 3 and 4, there
are three types of transitions between the sides, top and bottom of
the cargo tank 14; and each of these transitions is done smoothly
without the necessity for complex and heavy box girder structures.
The first type of corner transition is illustrated in FIG. 2 and is
indicated generally at 88; the second corner transition is
illustrated in FIG. 3 and is indicated generally at 90; and the
third is illustrated in FIG. 4 and is indicated generally at
92.
With reference first, to FIG. 2, the corner transition 88 will be
explained. This transition 88 may conveniently be termed a T
transition. Here, the horizontal corrugations in the side walls are
perpendicular to the horizontal corrugations in the top and bottom
walls. In this case, the transition between the side walls and the
top and bottom walls is made by abruptly ending the side wall
corrugations at the widest region thereof and by terminating the
top and bottom corrugations by smoothly tapering these corrugations
into flat plates spaced apart by the maximum distance between the
corrugations. From FIG. 2, it can be seen that the smooth corner
transitions require no T-welds or box girder structures. Further,
because of the smoothness of the transition, local areas of extreme
stress are avoided.
In FIG. 3, the second type of corner transition, transition 90,
will be explained. Transition 90 may be termed an L transition.
Here, while the side all corrugations are perpendicular to the top
and bottom wall corrugations, an L is defined at the intersection.
This transition is developed, both at the top and bottom walls, by
smoothly tapering both sets of corrugations into flat plates spaced
apart by a distance equal to a maximum corrugation spacing. Again,
the transition is made smoothly, thus avoiding the necessity for
box girders and T-welds and eliminating localized stress
concentration.
In FIG. 4, the last type of corner transition, indicated at 92, is
illustrated. This type of corner transition 92 may be termed a
"parallel" transition, for the side wall corrugations are parallel
to the top and bottom wall corrugations. Here, the mating is
carried out by abruptly ending the corrugations in the side walls,
the top and the bottom, at the region where the distance between
the outer and inner walls of the tank are maximum, the corners
being defined by smoothly curved plates. Again the corner is
defined without the use of box girders, without T-welds and without
areas of local stress concentration.
In FIG. 10, a typical corner transition is illustrated in
perspective. Here, it can be seen that the transition is smooth and
that it is designed so that the maximum distance between the
corrugated tank walls is utilized. The construction of the corner
is as follows.
Corrugation transition pieces 100 are fit on each of the corrugated
walls and are designed to gradually taper the corrugations to a
flat plate. The transition pieces 100 are welded to their
respective corrugated walls by a butt weld, seen at 102. The two
transition pieces 100 are then butt welded to a vertical arcuate
corner piece 104, and the vertical transition is completed. The
remaining portions of the corner transition illustrated in FIG. 10
are completed by similarly joining the tank top to its adjacent
tank side walls by means of horizontal arcuate corner pieces 106
and by fitting the one eighth spherical corner piece 108 between
the respective corner pieces 104 and 106.
From the above description of the three types of corner
transitions, the advantages of the inventive corrugated tank should
be clear. With the smooth transitions described above, the standard
box girder structures are eliminated. This results both in weight
savings and cost savings. And, because the transitions are smooth,
rather than abrupt, all T-welds are avoided, these being replaced
by butt welds or seam welds. As noted previously, butt and seam
welds are less difficult to perfect than are T-welds, and are more
readily checked for faulty welds by radiographic analysis. Further,
due to the smooth transitions at the tank corners, excessive areas
of stress concentration are avoided.
Now, with reference to FIGS. 8a and 8b, the corrugated top and
sides of the tank, and the corrugated bottom of the tank will be
described. The side and top corrugations are shown at 94 and the
bottom corrugations are shown at 96. As can be seen, the depth of
the corrugations in the top and sides of the tank is less than the
depth of the corrugations in the bottom of the tank. This is the
result of the relationship between the depth of the corrugation and
the amount of stiffening provided by the corrugated wall. That is,
the greater is the depth of the corrugation, the greater is the
stiffening. Naturally, because the stress experienced by the bottom
of the tank is substantially greater than the stress experienced by
the sides and top of the tank, it is desirable that the bottom of
the tank be structurally more sound than the remaining portions of
the tank.
As can be seen in FIGS. 8a and 8b, the depth of the corrugations in
the sides and top is 10 inches and the depth of the corrugations in
the bottom is 111/2 inches. Naturally, these dimensions are given
as examples only, and may be varied in accordance with the
structural requirements of the particular tank. Further, while the
sides and top could be corrugated to 111/2 inches, for uniformity,
such design would be economically unsound.
The smallest distance between the tank corrugations, both in FIG.
8a and FIG. 8b, is approximately 10 inches. As noted previously,
this dimension might be increased so as to provide for inspection
access between all portions of the corrugated walls. For example,
the narrowest dimension might be increased from approximately 10
inches to approximately 18 inches, the 18 inch dimension allowing
passage of the man of average size.
As also seen in FIGS. 8a and 8b, the flats on the corrugations are
longer in the corrugated bottom 96 than in the corrugated top and
sides 94 of the tank. The increased depth of the corrugations in
the bottom wall and the placement of the longitudinal girders make
such increased dimension possible. Naturally, the specific
dimensions of the corrugations depend upon the use of the tank and
the anticipated stress expected to be encountered thereby.
Above, several embodiments of the present invention have been
described. It should be appreciated, however, that these
embodiments are described for purposes of illustration only and
that numerous alterations and modifications may be practiced by
those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and
scope of the invention. Accordingly, it is the intent that the
invention not be limited by the above but be limited only as
defined in the appended claims.
* * * * *