U.S. patent number 3,720,261 [Application Number 05/174,833] was granted by the patent office on 1973-03-13 for apparatus for rotatably suspending a pipe string in a well.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Esso Production Research Company. Invention is credited to Joe K. Heilhecker, William C. Maurer.
United States Patent |
3,720,261 |
Heilhecker , et al. |
March 13, 1973 |
APPARATUS FOR ROTATABLY SUSPENDING A PIPE STRING IN A WELL
Abstract
An apparatus for rotatably suspending a pipe string in a well
includes a rotating member, a stationary member, and a bearing
assembly. The bearing assembly is mounted in a chamber defined by
the rotating and stationary members and is interposed between
axially spaced and transversely extending bearing surfaces formed,
respectively, in the stationary and rotating members. The bearing
assembly includes a plastic ring positioned in the chamber to
engage one of the bearing surfaces and two concentric metal rings
positioned in the chamber to substantially cover the other bearing
surface. The engagement of the plastic ring on the metal rings is
such to force the metal rings radially apart and against opposite
interior surfaces of the chamber as thrust loads are applied to the
apparatus.
Inventors: |
Heilhecker; Joe K. (Bellaire,
TX), Maurer; William C. (Houston, TX) |
Assignee: |
Esso Production Research
Company (Houston, TX)
|
Family
ID: |
22637712 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/174,833 |
Filed: |
August 25, 1971 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
166/208;
384/420 |
Current CPC
Class: |
E21B
33/0415 (20130101); E21B 33/043 (20130101); E21B
43/10 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
E21B
33/04 (20060101); E21B 33/043 (20060101); E21B
33/03 (20060101); E21B 43/10 (20060101); E21B
43/02 (20060101); E21b 043/10 () |
Field of
Search: |
;166/208
;308/135,160,164,238 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Leppink; James A.
Claims
We claim:
1. An apparatus for rotatably suspending a pipe string in a well
which comprises a stationary member adapted to be secured to a
supporting structure for said well; a rotating member adapted to be
connected to said pipe string, said stationary and rotating members
in combination defining an annular chamber therebetween including
two axially spaced and transversely disposed bearing surfaces; two
concentric rings of bearing metal substantially covering one of
said surfaces; and a plastic ring between said concentric rings and
the other of said surfaces, the engagement of said plastic ring on
each of said concentric rings being such to force said concentric
rings apart and against the interior of said chamber in response to
axial thrust on said apparatus.
2. The apparatus as defined in claim 1 wherein said concentric
rings are sized to enable relative sliding movement
therebetween.
3. The apparatus as defined in claim 2 wherein said concentric
rings are sized to provide a radial clearance therebetween of less
than about 5 mils.
4. The apparatus as defined in claim 2 wherein said concentric
rings are sized in relation to each other to provide a radial
clearance therebetween of from 0 to 2 mils.
5. The apparatus as defined in claim 2 wherein said one surface is
faced with a hard-facing alloy.
6. The apparatus as defined in claim 1 wherein said bearing rings
are composed of a bearing metal having a Brinnell hardness less
than about 100.
7. The apparatus as defined in claim 6 wherein said bearing metal
is a bronze alloy.
8. The apparatus as defined in claim 1 wherein said plastic
material is a fluoroplastic.
9. The apparatus as defined in claim 5 wherein said fluoroplastic
is polytetrafluoroethylene.
10. A pipe hanger for rotatably suspending a pipe string from a
supporting structure in a well which comprises: a stationary
support member adapted to be secured to said supporting structure;
a rotating member adapted to suspend said pipe string, one of said
members having an annular groove formed therein, and the other of
said members having an annular end portion positioned in said
groove, said groove and said end portion presenting axially spaced
and transversely disposed surfaces; a bearing assembly mounted in
said groove between said surfaces and including a plastic ring and
two concentric metal rings positioned in said groove to
substantially cover the radial spaces between said end portion and
the inner and other walls of the groove to prevent excessive
extrusion of the plastic ring.
11. The pipe hanger as defined in claim 10 wherein said metal rings
are composed of a bearing metal having a Brinnell hardness less
than about 100.
12. The pipe hanger as defined in claim 10 wherein said plastic
ring is composed of a fluoroplastic.
13. The pipe hanger as defined in claim 12 wherein the
fluoroplastic is polytetrafluoroethylene.
14. The pipe hanger as defined in claim 10 wherein said metal rings
are sized to provide a radial clearance therebetween of less than
about 5 mils.
15. The pipe hanger as defined in claim 14 wherein said radial
clearance is between 0 and about 2 mils.
16. The pipe hanger as defined in claim 10 wherein said end portion
positioned in said groove is faced with a hard-facing alloy.
17. An apparatus for rotatably suspending a liner in a case bore
which comprises: a stationary member having an axial opening formed
therein; means for securing said stationary member to the interior
of the well casing; a rotatable member having a tubular portion
extending through said opening formed in said stationary member,
the lower end of said tubular portion being adapted to be connected
to said liner, and a flanged portion having a downwardly opening,
annular groove formed therein, said stationary member having an
upper end portion disposed in said groove; a plastic ring mounted
in said groove above said end portion; and two concentric metal
bearing rings positioned in said groove to substantially cover the
radial space between said end portion and the walls of said groove
to prevent excessive extrusion of said plastic ring.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to an improved pipe hanging apparatus usable
in well completion operations.
2. Description of the Prior Art
In completing an oil well, gas well, water well, or similar
borehole, it is customary to case the well with heavy steel pipe
and provide a cement sheath about the outer periphery of the pipe.
The cement sheath adds strength to the pipe string, protects the
metal from corrosion, and prevents migration of fluids between
subsurface formations. For the cement to be effective, it is
essential that it substantially surrounds the pipe string.
Placement of the cement about the pipe normally involves
positioning the pipe string in the wellbore and pumping a cement
slurry down through the pipe string and up the wellbore annulus.
The cement slurry displaces the drilling mud ahead of it. Because
of the relatively high gel strength of most drilling muds, complete
displacement of the drilling mud by the cement slurry is difficult
to achieve, particularly with long pipe strings. Experience has
shown that the cement slurry tends to channel through the drilling
mud, resulting in a nonuniform cement sheath about the pipe string.
One approach for improving the displacement operation involves a
technique wherein the pipe is rotated as the cement slurry is
pumped through the pipe string and up the well bore annulus. Tests
have shown that pipe rotation improves mud displacement in two
important respects: it breaks the gel structure of the mud and it
eliminates stagnant pockets of mud in the wellbore annulus. For
wells drilled on land, rotation can be achieved by suspending the
casing on the drilling swivel and applying torque to the casing by
the rotary table. For offshore wells drilled with floating vessels,
however, use of the swivel to suspend the pipe is not possible
because of vessel motion. Vessel motion requires that the casing be
suspended on the subsea wellhead assembly. The radial space for
accommodating the casing hanger in most subsea assemblies is
limited. This limited "bowl" space does not provide sufficient
radial clearance to permit the use of rolling-element bearings
having sufficient load carrying capacity to support the casing
string. The cementing of such pipe strings is thus generally
performed without the known benefits of pipe rotation. As
previously noted, this substantially increases the risk of
obtaining a poor cement job.
Another application where pipe rotation is desirable is in liner
installations. A liner is a pipe string suspended within an
existing casing string in the wellbore. It is normally employed
where it is not necessary for the inner pipe to extend to the
surface. Considerable savings in pipe cost can be realized by
suspending the liner within a lower portion of the outer casing
string. Rotating liner hangers are commercially available and
normally include a ball bearing for carrying thrust loads. Such
assemblies, because of their limited load carrying capacity, are
normally used to set relatively short lengths of liners. This
somewhat limits the utility of rotating liner hangers because, as
previously noted, the mud displacement problem is particularly
serious in long pipe strings.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The improved apparatus constructed according to the present
invention can be used in connection with casing hangers, liner
hangers, or other applications where it is desired to rotatably
support a pipe string in a well. Briefly, the apparatus includes a
stationary member, a rotatable member, and a bearing assembly for
carrying thrust loads. As applied in connection with pipe hanging
assemblies, the stationary member is designed to be secured to the
wellhead assembly or outer casing, and the rotatable member is
designed to carry the pipe string to be cemented in the borehole.
When assembled, the stationary member and rotatable member define a
substantially enclosed chamber which contains the thrust bearing
assembly. The thrust bearing assembly comprises two rings composed
of relatively soft bearing metal such as copper or bronze alloys
and a plastic ring having a relatively low coefficient of friction.
The bearing assembly is positioned within the chamber in such a
manner that the plastic ring engages one of the members, e.g.,
rotating member, and the two metal rings arranged in concentric
relation substantially cover the gap between the two members to
prevent excessive extrusion of the plastic ring. The metal rings
preferably are sized in relation to each other to provide a
relatively small clearance therebetween. The plastic ring engages
both metal rings and is shaped in relation to the confronting
surfaces of the metal rings to provide a radial component of force
on each metal ring as load is applied to the assembly. Applied
load, thus, tends to force the metal rings apart into sealing
engagement with the chamber walls.
The surface of the member engaging the metal rings preferably is
faced with a hard, wear-resistant material such as one of the
nickel-chromium-boron alloys.
The thrust bearing assembly requires substantially less radial
mounting space than that required for rolling-element bearings of
comparable load carrying capacity. Pipe hangers provided with the
bearings assembly can be readily suspended in subsea assemblies as
well as within casing strings and permit rotation of substantially
longer pipe strings therein than previously possible. Tests have
shown that the apparatus of the present invention can support
thrust pressures as high as 10,900 psi for several hours with no
noticeable deterioration of the bearings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a schematic view, shown partially in longitudinal
section, of a portion of a subsea well assembly illustrating the
apparatus in connection with casing hangers.
FIG. 2 is an enlarged, fragmentary view of the apparatus shown in
FIG. 1 showing details of the improved apparatus.
FIG. 3 is a longitudinal sectional view of a portion of a cased
wellbore illustrating the apparatus in connection with a liner
hanger.
FIG. 4 is an elevational view, shown in longitudinal section, of a
test rig employing the support apparatus of the present
invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
For purposes of illustration, the present invention will be
described in connection with a casing hanger and a liner hanger. It
should be emphasized, however, that the improved apparatus can be
used in other applications where it is desired to rotatably suspend
a pipe string in a well.
Depending upon pipe diameter, pipe location, and pipe use, pipe
strings are referred to in the art as drilled pipe, casing, tubing,
or liners. As used herein, the terms "pipe" or "pipe string"
embrace the wide variety of conduits commonly used in the drilling,
completion, and repair of wells.
Considering first the embodiment in connection with casing hangers,
FIG. 1 schematically illustrates a subsea wellhead assembly for a
floating drilling vessel. The assembly comprises a guide structure
10 resting on the ocean floor, a surface pipe string 11, and a
hanger mandrel 12. The surface pipe string 11 is suspended on the
guide structure 10 and is cemented in place. The hanger mandrel 12
has a cone section 13 which mates with an internal shoulder, or
"bowl," 14 secured to the surface pipe 11. The mandrel 12 serves
several functions: it provides means for supporting components of
the subsea assembly which include a hydraulic connector,
illustrated as 15, blowout preventors, marine conductor pipe, and
similar equipment; it also provides a support base for suspending
pipe strings installed during the drilling of the well. In deep
wells, the mandrel 12 will normally provide support for several
casing strings. For example, one common design calls for 30 inch
diameter surface pipe, three intermediate casing strings of 20 inch
diameter, 133/8 inch diameter, and 95/8 inch diameter, and a
production string of 7 inches in diameter. Thus, it is seen that
FIG. 1 is somewhat simplified in that only the surface pipe string
11, intermediate pipe string 16, and a production string 17 are
shown. Cementing of the intermediate pipe strings which are
relatively short in relation to the production string 17, normally
is not difficult to achieve because the relatively large annulus
between the casing and the borehole favors mud displacement by the
cement slurry. The production string 17, on the other hand, is
extremely difficult to cement because of the mud displacement
problems described earlier. Factors which promote cement channeling
through the mud include small clearance between the casing and
borehole, relatively long lengths of pipe, and the eccentric
location of the pipe string in the borehole. These factors coupled
with the gel characteristics of the mud make it extremely difficult
to obtain a competent cement sheath about the production string. It
has long been known that pipe rotation during cementing operation
improves the displacement mechanism. The rotating pipe breaks the
gel structure of the mud and eliminates stagnant pockets in the
annulus. As mentioned earlier, rotation of long pipe strings
suspended from floating vessels has not been possible, heretofore,
because of vessel motion. Moreover, the limited bowl space in
subsea wellhead assemblies precludes the use of conventional
bearings. As illustrated in FIG. 1, the casing hanger must be
sufficiently small to pass through the upper components of the
subsea assembly and to lodge in the mandrel 12.
A feature of the apparatus of the present invention is that it
requires relatively small radial mounting space and therefore can
readily be mounted in the mandrel 12.
The apparatus shown generally as 18, includes a stationary member
19, a rotating member 20, and a bearing assembly 21. The rotating
member 20 is adapted to carry the pipe string 17 whereas the
stationary member 19 is adapted to seat in the mandrel bowl. The
bearing assembly 21 permits relative rotation of the members 18 and
19 as torque is applied to the running-in string at the
surface.
Referring to FIG. 2, the rotating member 20 is seen to include a
tubular body portion 22 and a flanged portion 23 which extends
radially outwardly from body portion 22. The axial opening through
the apparatus should have a diameter about the same as the casing
string 17 suspended therebelow. Formed in the flanged portion 23 is
a downwardly opening annular groove sized to receive bearing 21 and
associated components. The bearing 21 comprises a three ring
assembly including a plastic ring 25 and two metal rings 26 and 27.
The plastic ring 25 fits into the upper portion of the groove and
engages a downwardly facing bearing surface of member 20. The two
rings 26 and 27 arranged concentrically in the groove define an
upper surface shaped complementary to the lower surface of plastic
ring 25. The stationary member in this embodiment comprises two
parts, washer 28 and retainer 29. The washer 28 is sized to fit
into the groove and therein provides an upwardly facing bearing
surface. The three ring bearing assembly 21 and washer 28 are
maintained within the groove by the retainer 29. In a sense then
the washer 28 and rotating member 20 cooperate to define a
substantially enclosed chamber having confronting axially spaced
and transversely disposed bearing surfaces. The plastic ring 25 is
adapted to bear against one of the bearing surfaces and the
concentric rings 26 and 27 against the other. The retainer 29 bears
against the bottom surface of the washer 28 and has a lower flanged
portion 30 adapted to seat in the "bowl" or mating surface 31
formed in the mandrel 12. Several radial flow channels, two shown
as 35 and 36, formed in the bottom surface of flange 30 permit
drilling mud to flow around the apparatus during cementing
operations.
The rings 26 and 27 are arranged in side-by-side, concentric
relation in the groove and each has a downwardly facing surface
engaging the top surface of the washer 28 and a radially facing
surface confronting a wall of the groove. The inner surface of ring
26 confronts an outer surface of ring 27 along an interface (shown
as line 24 in FIG. 2). The clearance between the rings 26 and 27
along interface 24 should be sufficient to permit relative
rotational movement of the rings 26 and 27. This clearance can vary
within relatively wide limits depending on the size of the rings 26
and 27, pressure imposed on the apparatus, and materials employed.
Preferably, the clearance should be such to provide a sliding fit
between the rings 26 and 27, e.g., clearance less than 5 mils;
preferably between 0 and 2 mils.
Upper surfaces 32 and 33 of rings 26 and 27, respectively, can be
tapered as illustrated. These surfaces mate with the lower
complementary shaped surface of plastic ring 25. As thrust loads
are applied to the assembly, the mating relationship of ring 25 on
surfaces 32 and 33 results in a radial component of force on each
of the bearing rings 26 and 27. The outer ring 26 is forced into
abutting engagement with the outer confining surface of the groove
and the inner ring is forced into abutting engagement with the
inner surface of the groove. The rings 26 and 27 thus substantially
cover the radial spaces between the washer 28 and the walls of the
groove and prevent excessive extrusion of the plastic ring 25. It
should be observed that the specific configurations of the rings
25, 26, and 27 can be other than that disclosed. These
configurations, however, must be such to force the concentric rings
apart in response to axial thrust loads on the apparatus 18.
The bearing rings 26 and 27 can be made of any metal bearing
material. Preferably, the bearing material is of intermediate
compressive strength. The hardness and modulus of elasticity of
these materials should generally be as low as possible and yet
provide sufficient strength to carry the applied load. Preferred
bearing materials include bronze, leaded bronze, tin bronze,
phosphor bronze, as well as copper-lead alloys and similar bearing
materials. These materials are relatively soft having a Brinnell
hardness less than 100 and a relatively low modulus of
elasticity.
The bearing rings 26 and 27 can be machined to the proper
dimensions by conventional techniques. The size of the rings 26 and
27 should be such that they can be assembled in concentric relation
and inserted into the groove. The clearance between each ring and
the wall of the groove normally will be between about 2 and 6 mils
to permit easy installation.
The plastic ring 25 occupies substantially all of the space of the
groove above the bearing rings 26 and 27. The plastic ring can be
molded from most any dry bearing plastic, the most popular of which
includes nylon polycarbonates, acetals and the fluoroplastics. The
fluoroplastics, particularly polytetrafluoroethylene, are preferred
because of their low coefficient of friction, high temperature
resistance, and good lubricating qualities. These plastic materials
can be molded into the desired configuration by known molding
techniques. As indicated above, the top and outer surfaces of the
plastic ring 25 are shaped complementary to the confining walls of
the groove and the bottom surface is shaped complementary to the
top surface defined by the assembled rings 26 and 27.
As mentioned previously, the washer 28 should be faced with a hard,
wear-resistant surface. A steel core faced with
nickel-chromium-boron alloy has proven satisfactory for this
service. The alloy sold under the trade name Colmonoy provides a
highly polished, hard, wear-resistant surface. Other hard facing
materials include high chromium iron, cobalt chromium alloy, and
copper base alloys. The nickel-chromium-boron alloys are preferred,
however, because they are highly wear-resistant, and retain their
hardness at elevated temperatures.
The installation of the apparatus 18 when applied in connection
with casing hangers can be performed as follows. When the well has
been drilled to the proper depth, the drill string is withdrawn
from the wellbore and a casing string denoted 17 in FIG. 1 is
lowered into the hold by conventional techniques. The apparatus 18
comprising rotatable member 20, bearing assembly 21, and the
stationary member (washer 28 and retainer 29) is secured to the top
joint of the casing string 17. The retainer 29 may be held in place
by mechanical means such as a plurality of shear pins, two shown as
34 in FIG. 2, extending radially through the flange 23 and having
inner end portions protruding into suitable recesses formed in
retainer 29. The apparatus 18 connected to the casing string 17 is
lowered to the proper setting location on a pipe string 37 of the
same diameter as casing 17. This assembly is run into the hole
until the retainer flange 30 seats on the mandrel bowl surface 31.
This transfers the weight of the casing 17 to the mandrel 12.
Initial torque applied to the string 37 at the surface causes the
pins 34 to shear, permitting rotation of member 20 on the
stationary portion of the apparatus. The thrust loads applied on
the bearing assembly cause the plastic ring 25 to deform and
substantially conform to the shape of the upper extremity of the
chamber. The plastic material thus acts much in the manner of the
viscous fluid applying a hydraulic force on the bearing rings 26
and 27 forcing them apart into engagement with their respective
chamber walls. Engagement of the bearing rings 26 and 27 on the
chamber walls prevents excessive axial extrusion of the plastic
material between the rings 26 and 27 and the walls of the
groove.
Although it is not clear which of the rings 25, 26 and 27 remain
stationary and which rotate, the wear pattern on test assemblies
indicate that part of the time the outer ring 26 remains stationary
and that the plastic ring 25 and inner ring 27 rotate. The plastic
material tends to extrude at a slow rate between the rings 26 and
27 and the groove walls and along interface 24 providing
lubrication for the sliding surfaces. The extruding plastic also
provides lubrication for the sliding surfaces between washer 28 and
ring 26 and/or ring 27.
During pipe rotation, cement can be pumped through the running-in
pipe string 37, the casing 17 and up the wellbore annulus
displacing drilling mud ahead of it. The drilling mud flows through
the channels 35 and 36 in the retainer flange 30 and to the
surface. After the cement has been placed, the running-in pipe
string 37 can be disconnected from the rotating member 20 and
retrieved. In some applications it may be necessary to run a packer
to seal the annulus above the flange 23 to close off the flow
channels 35 and 36.
Another embodiment of the invention is disclosed in connection with
a liner hanger, shown in FIG. 3. A liner is generally installed in
lieu of a complete casing string in order to save on material cost.
Liners are normally duspended in a lower portion of an existing
casing and cemented in place. A liner hanger attached to the top of
the liner is required in order to secure the assembly to the
existing casing. Although rotating liner hangers have been used in
the past, their limited load carrying capacity has restricted their
use to relatively short liners. The apparatus of the present
invention permits the suspension of relatively long liners.
The liner hanger 40 comprises a rotating head 41, a stationary
member 42, a bearing assembly shown generally as 43, and a slip
assembly 44. The upper end of the head 41 is adapted to be
connected to a running-in string 45, e.g., tubing, drill pipe,
etc., and the lower end is adapted to be connected to a liner 46.
The running-in string 45 may also include a setting tool (not
shown) which functions to collapse packers after the cementing
operation is completed.
The rotating head 41 includes a tubular body portion 47 and a
flange 48 which extends radially outwardly from the body 47. The
inside diameter of the head 41 is preferably the same as that of
the liner 46. The flange 47 has formed therein an annular,
downwardly opening groove sized to receive the three ring bearing
assembly 43, which is generally the same construction as previously
described, having a plastic ring and two metal rings. Because of
the space limitations between the liner 46 and existing casing
shown as 49, the bearing assembly 43 used in liner hangers probably
will be somewhat smaller in radial dimension than the bearing
assembly used in casing hangers described previously.
The bearing assembly 43 bears against a washer 50 which closes the
groove opening. The washer 50 has an upper bearing surface engaging
the bottom surface of the bearing assembly 43 and preferably is
faced with a hard, wear-resistant material such as a
nickel-chromium-boron alloy. The washer 50 and bearing assembly 43
are maintained within the groove by top surface of a slip expander
cone 51. The cone 51 extends circumferentially around the tubular
portion 47 and is sized in relation thereto to permit free rotation
of the two members. A stop collar 52 secured to the tubular portion
47 maintains the cone 51 in place during running-in operations. The
slip assembly 44 includes a plurality of gripping jaws 53. Each
gripping jaw 53 is riveted or otherwise connected to a spring
member 54 which is an extension of a bow spring 55. The bow springs
55 are shaped to frictionally engage the well casing 49. During
running-in operations, the gripping jaws 53 are maintained in a
retracted position below the cone 51. At the proper setting depth
the jaws 53 are released by reciprocation of the pipe or by
hydraulic action depending upon the mechanism employed. Lowering of
the pipe then causes the jaws 53 to be wedged between the casing 49
and cone 51 as illustrated in FIG. 3.
In operation, the liner 46 and hanger 40 are lowered into the cased
wellbore on a running-in pipe string 45 which as previously noted
can include a setting tool of conventional construction. At the
proper setting depth, the slip assembly 44 is actuated, causing the
slip jaws 53 to be wedged between the cone and the casing. This
transfers the load of the liner 46 and running-in assembly to the
stationary portion of the hanger, e.g., washer 50, cone 51, and
slip jaws 53 which are, in turn, supported on the well casing 49.
As cement is pumped from the surface through the running-in string
45, the hanger 40, the liner 46, and up the casing-liner annulus,
the pipe string is rotated by applying torque at the surface. The
drilling mud displaced by the cement flows up the annulus passing
around the liner hanger 40. Following the cementing operations, the
running-in string is disengaged from the liner hanger 40 and
retrieved. The liner hanger 40 constructed according to the present
invention, because of the increased load carrying capacity of the
bearing assembly 43, is capable of supporting substantially longer
liners than are commercially available liner hangers.
The following laboratory experiment illustrates the effectiveness
of the apparatus of the present invention. A test assembly shown in
FIG. 4 was constructed. The assembly included a steel head member
61 having a downwardly opening groove formed therein. The groove
had an outside diameter of 3.533 inches and a thickness of 0.721
inches. A bearing assembly comprising a plastic ring 62 of
polytetrafluoroethylene and two bearing rings 63 and 64 of phosphor
bronze (SAE 660 ) were placed in the groove. The
polytetrafluoroethylene ring 62 was 3.529 inches in outside
diameter, 0.713 inches thick, and 0.375 inches in height (from tip
to base). The inside and outside diameters of the inner ring 63
were 2.816 and 3.173 inches, respectively, and the inside and
outside diameters of the outer rings 64 were 3.173 and 3.529
inches, respectively. The rings 63 and 64 were 0.250 inches in
height and had upper, inwardly tapering shoulders which defined an
included angle of 110.degree.. A washer 65 faced with Colmonoy
hard, wear-resistant alloy was inserted in the groove. The washer
65 had inside and outside diameters of 2.817 and 3.528 inches,
respectively, and a height of 0.310 inches. The head 61 and bearing
assembly were placed on the upper end of a short joint of pipe 66.
The pipe bolted to a base had inside and outside diameters of about
2.85 and 3.50 inches, respectively. A radial bearing 67 having an
inner race secured to the pipe 66 and an outer race secured to the
head 51 maintained the pipe 66 and groove in axial alignment. The
head 61 was connected to a hydraulic press, a portion shown as
joint 68. The test apparatus included a rotary table for rotating
joint 68 and a torque transducer for measuring the applied torque.
A load of 40,000 pounds was applied to the head 61 as the assembly
was rotated at 20 rpm. The 40,000 load resulted in a pressure of
about 10,900 psi on the thrust bearing. The initial torque required
to maintain 20 rpm was about 280 foot-pounds. After 31/2 hours, the
test was discontinued for 10 minutes. When the test was resumed at
same operating conditions, the torque required to rotate the
assembly at 20 rpm with applied load of 40,000 pounds was initially
about 550 foot-pounds. The torque leveled off to about 350
foot-pounds in about 2 minutes and then, after about 10 minutes,
increased to about 380 foot-pounds. The test was discontinued. The
test apparatus was disassembled. The plastic ring 62 and bearing
rings 63 and 64 were intact and showed very little wear. The
following morning, the test was resumed and continued for 31/2
additional hours. During the final 25 minutes, the torque was
somewhat erratic, increasing to about 700 foot-pounds at one point
and 600 foot-pounds at another. At the conclusion of the test,
however, the assembly was rotating smoothly at an average torque of
about 430 foot-pounds. Following the test, the test apparatus was
disassembled. The plastic ring 62 had split along a horizontal
plane near the base of the tapered portion. The lower bearing
surface of outer ring 64 was badly pitted whereas the corresponding
surface of inner ring 63 showed no evidence of pitting. The outer
periphery of ring 64 was worn indicating relative motion between
that ring and the wall of the groove. The inner surface of ring 63
was not worn indicating that that ring was secured to the head 61.
The interface between the rings 63 and 64 appeared to be a sliding
surface, the height of which was about one-half of the original
height of the interface. Above this sliding surface was a V-shaped
groove about one thirty-second inch wide. This groove extended from
the sliding surface to the top of the original interface. There was
evidence of lubrication by the plastic between the outer periphery
of ring 64 and the groove wall. There was also evidence of plastic
lubrication between the bottom surface of ring 64 and washer
65.
The above test shows that the apparatus of the present invention
has sufficient load carrying capacity to support relatively long
strings of pipe for several hours. The reason for the improved
results are not clearly understood. It is believed, however, that
the lubrication provided by the plastic material extruding between
sliding surfaces plays a major role. The radial component of force
on the rings 63 and 64 forcing them apart appears to prevent
excessive axial extrusion of the plastic material. This force also
causes the rings 63 and 64 to conform to the walls of the groove
thereby compensating for wear.
Although the improved apparatus has been described mainly in
connection with casing and liner hangers, it again should be
emphasized that the invention can be applied equally well in other
applications where it is desired to rotatably suspend a pipe string
in a well.
* * * * *