U.S. patent number 3,696,757 [Application Number 05/129,899] was granted by the patent office on 1972-10-10 for dampened railway car truck.
This patent grant is currently assigned to British Railways Board. Invention is credited to David Boocock, Michael Newman.
United States Patent |
3,696,757 |
Newman , et al. |
October 10, 1972 |
DAMPENED RAILWAY CAR TRUCK
Abstract
A railway train having articulated vehicle bodies. A steering
beam spans across each two adjacent vehicle bodies. Each beam is
vertically pivoted or ball-jointed at points along the longitudinal
center line of the adjacent vehicle bodies at some distance from
the end of each vehicle body. The steering beam acts as a structure
to which a suspension unit (bogie truck) is attached. The
suspension unit is attached to the beam in a manner which permits
the suspension unit to rotate in yaw about a vertical axis. The yaw
rotation may be accomplished either freely or against the restraint
of springs, viscous dampers or friction devices.
Inventors: |
Newman; Michael (London,
EN), Boocock; David (London, EN) |
Assignee: |
British Railways Board (London,
EN)
|
Family
ID: |
10411674 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/129,899 |
Filed: |
March 31, 1971 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
849322 |
Aug 12, 1969 |
|
|
|
|
Foreign Application Priority Data
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 20, 1969 [GB] |
|
|
39,818/68 |
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
105/4.4; 105/168;
105/171; 105/174; 105/175.1; 105/176; 105/211 |
Current CPC
Class: |
B61F
3/125 (20130101); B61F 5/325 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
B61F
3/12 (20060101); B61F 3/00 (20060101); B61F
5/32 (20060101); B61F 5/00 (20060101); B61f
003/12 (); B61f 005/24 (); B61f 005/38 () |
Field of
Search: |
;105/3,4R,4A,167,168,171,174,176,175A,182R,199R,211 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: La Point; Arthur L.
Assistant Examiner: Beltran; Howard
Parent Case Text
This application is a continuation-in-part of our U. S. application
Ser. No. 849,322, filed Aug. 12, 1969, and now abandoned.
Claims
We claim:
1. A railway train comprising:
a. at least two vehicle bodies articulated at their adjacent ends
to restrain relative lateral displacement therebetween but to
permit relative angular displacement therebetween.
b. a rigid beam connected at its ends to the two vehicle bodies at
a distance longitudinally of the vehicle bodies from their
articulated connection with each other and in a manner permitting
said relative angular displacement of said vehicle bodies, and
c. a suspension unit including at least two wheelsets, the
suspension unit being attached to said beam in the region of the
mid-length of said beam in a manner which permits it to yaw
relatively to said beam about a vertical axis between the
wheelsets.
2. A railway train according to claim 1, wherein said vertical axis
passes through the articulation point of the vehicle bodies, when
the vehicle bodies are on straight track.
3. A railway train according to claim 1, wherein said suspension
unit comprises a frame in which are mounted at least two wheelsets,
said frame being pivotally connected to said rigid beam through a
yaw suspension for rotation against the restraint of said yaw
suspension about said vertical axis.
4. A railway train as claimed in claim 3, wherein said wheelsets
are mounted in said frame through a further yaw suspension
permitting a restrained yawing movement of said wheelsets
relatively to said frame.
5. A railway train as claimed in claim 1, wherein said suspension
unit comprises an intermediate frame connected to said steering
beam through a lateral suspension arrangement, a first end frame
carrying a first wheelset and connected at one end to one end of
the intermediate frame and at its other end to said beam through a
yaw suspension so that it can yaw relatively to said beam and the
intermediate frame and a second end frame connected at one end to
the other end of said intermediate frame and at its other end to
said beam through a yaw suspension so that it can yaw relatively to
said beam and the intermediate frame, said intermediate frame being
connected to said end frames so that it is restrained from lateral
movement relative to said end frames.
6. A railway train comprising:
a. at least two vehicle bodies articulated at their adjacent ends
to restrain relative lateral displacement therebetween but to
permit relative angular displacement therebetween,
b. a rigid beam connected at its ends to the two vehicle bodies at
a distance longitudinally of the vehicle bodies from their
articulated connection with each other and in a manner permitting
said relative angular displacement of said vehicle bodies,
c. at least two wheelsets located in the region of the mid-length
of said beam, and
d. a yaw suspension through which said wheelsets are mounted to
said beam and which restrains said wheelsets against angular
movements in a horizontal plane.
Description
This invention relates to railway trains and is directed to the
problem of steering railway vehicles making up a train round curved
track.
The object of the invention is to provide a mechanism for
articulated trains that (a) provides geometric steering of
suspension units (bogie trucks) between vehicles into an attitude
substantially tangential to the track when on curves of constant
curvature and (b) permits gross yaw misalignments of the suspension
units relative to the vehicle centerlines so that curves of varying
curvature, particularly reverse curves (S- curves), can be
negotiated without risk of derailment.
According to this invention a railway train comprises at least two
vehicle bodies articulated at their adjacent ends to restrain
relative lateral displacement therebetween but to permit relative
angular displacement therebetween, a rigid beam (hereinafter termed
a "steering beam" connected at its ends to the two vehicle bodies
at a distance longitudinally of the vehicle bodies from their
articulated connection with each other and in a manner permitting
said relative angular displacement of said vehicle bodies, and a
suspension unit including at least one wheelset mounted on said
beam, the suspension unit being attached to the steering beam in a
manner which permits it to rotate in yaw about a vertical axis.
Preferably said vertical axis passes through the body articulation
point on straight track.
The yaw rotation may be accomplished either freely or against the
restraint of springs, viscous-dampers or friction devices.
The invention will now be further explained with the aid of the
accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 shows a schematic plan view of an intermediate vehicle and
its two adjacent vehicles in a train having a configuration
according to the invention and negotiating a curved track of
constant curvature; the radius of curvature of the track related to
the length of the vehicles has been shown much smaller than would
be experienced in practice so that the relative displacements of
the vehicle bodies etc. when the train is negotiating curved track
can be readily appreciated from the drawings.
FIG. 2 shows a schematic plan view of two of the adjacent vehicles
shown in FIG. 1 negotiating a reverse curve.
FIG. 3 is a side elevation of one form of connecting and suspension
arrangement at the adjacent ends of adjacent vehicle bodies of the
train.
FIG. 4 is a plan view of the arrangement shown in FIG. 3,
FIG. 5 is a side elevation of a second form of connecting and
suspension arrangement at the adjacent ends of adjacent vehicle
bodies of the train, and
FIG. 6 is a plan view of the arrangement shown in FIG. 5.
In FIGS. 1 and 2 the vehicle bodies 1, 2 and 3 are represented by
their longitudinal center lines and the track 4 is represented by
its center line. The vehicle body 1 is articulated to the bodies 2
and 3 at joints J. Extending across each of the joints J between
the bodies 1 and 2 and bodies 1 and 3 are steering beams S. Each
steering beam S is connected at points S.sub.1 and S.sub.2 to the
two associated vehicle bodies by pin joints or other means of
lateral constraint on the longitudinal center lines of the bodies
1, 2 and 3 and which permit the bodies 1, 2 and 3 freely to take up
their relative angular position on curved track.
Each of the steering beams S carries a suspension unit in the form
of a bogie with two wheelsets W.sub.1 and W.sub.2, the wheelsets
being of a kind having their axles mounted for rotation in axle
boxes and their wheels connected for rotation with the axles. Each
suspension unit, as described hereinafter with reference to FIGS. 3
to 6, is mounted for yaw rotation about a vertical axis which in
straight track passes through the articulation points J.
Throughout the length of the train up to the leading and last
vehicle bodies the arrangement will be similar to that shown in
FIGS. 1 and 2.
Referring to FIG. 1, the ratio between the lengths b.sub.1 and
b.sub.2 is chosen so that the steering beam lies substantially
tangential to the track at point T. Clearly, if the vehicle bodies
are of equal lengths so that the vehicle body points of tangency
Q.sub.1 and Q.sub.2 are at the mid-lengths of the vehicles, the
steering-beam is symmetrical about point T, i.e. b.sub.1 = b.sub.2.
The case where b.sub.1 does not equal b.sub.2 is considered below.
When the vehicles articulate as shown in FIG. 1, i.e., when the
steering beam is tangential, it is evident that the suspension unit
carried by the steering-beam S is steered into a tangential
position without resultant yaw rotation between the suspension unit
and the steering beam. The steering beam thus acts as a coarse
steering mechanism for the axles. Since the two axles are each
displaced by distances afrom the point of tangency T, they are not
steered by the steering beam into perfect radial alignment.
However, provided the error is small, creep forces (friction forces
due to microslip between wheel tread and rail) are, within the
limits of adhesion, able to yaw the axles more nearly into the
desired radial alignment against the restraint of primary yaw
suspension springs.
Since the triangle S.sub.1 JS.sub.2 in FIG. 1 varies in size as a
function of track curvature, relative longitudinal freedom must be
incorporated into one of the joints, S.sub.1, J, or S.sub.2.
Conveniently, joint J is chosen to have longitudinal freedom, so
that the steering beam can act as a coupling member between
adjacent vehicles, and so transmit traction, braking, and
longitudinal buffing forces down the train.
FIG. 2 shows a schematic plan-view of two vehicles negotiating a
reverse curve, the suspension unit being shown as straddling the
point of inflection of the track. In this case, the center lines of
two adjacent vehicle bodies may be substantially in line, so that
the steering beam cannot be aligned tangential to the track. It
follows, however, that the suspension unit must rotate in yaw
relative to the steering beam by angle .psi. in order to negotiate
the curve. Therefore, the suspension unit must be pivoted, actually
or effectively, at a single point on the steering beam. Also, the
restraint in yaw must not be excessive, otherwise a dangerous
tendency to derail may ensue.
Although a two-axled bogie suspension unit is shown in FIGS. 1 and
2, the suspension unit could equally be single-axled, three-axled,
etc.
As mentioned above the lengths b.sub.1 and b.sub.2 have to be
different if the steering beam S is to take up a tangential
attitude on constant curvature track when the beam is attached to
vehicles of dissimilar lengths. Q.sub.1 and Q.sub.2 are the points
along the vehicle bodies which are chosen to be tangential to
constant curvature track. Assuming that the track center line
radius Ro is very large compared with the vehicle dimensions, we
may write, for the steering beam to be tangential at point T,
JS.sub. 1 T = j.sub. 1 /Ro
JS.sub. 2 T = j.sub. 2 /Ro
where j.sub.1 and j.sub.2 are the distances shown on FIG. 1.
Therefore, the throwover distance TJ may be written as
b.sub. 1 j.sub.1 /Ro = b.sub. 2 j.sub.2 /Ro
Hence, if length b.sub.1 is specified, from consideration of other
factors, length b.sub.2 must be arranged to be
b.sub.2 = j.sub.1 /j.sub.2 b.sub.1
Referring now to FIGS. 3 and 4, these show the suspension and
interconnecting arrangement at the adjacent ends of two adjacent
bodies. For convenience the arrangement will be considered as that
at the adjacent ends of vehicle bodies 1 and 2 of FIGS. 1 and
2.
In FIGS. 3 and 4 the articulation joint J is represented by ball
joint 26, the steering beam S by member 24 and the joints S.sub.1
and S.sub.2 by ball joints 25.
The suspension unit comprises a bogie frame (i.e. a truck frame) 11
supported on the axles boxes 12 of wheelsets W.sub.1 and W.sub.2
via primary vertical and yaw suspensions represented
diagrammatically at 12'. A secondary frame 33 is connected to the
bogie frame 11 by swing links 34 providing a lateral suspension.
The steering beam 24 is supported on the secondary frame 33 and
hence on the bogie frame by vertical springs 35. The weight of the
bodies 1 and 2 is supported in turn by the steering beam 24.
Connected between the bogie frame 11 and the steering beam 24 is a
yaw suspension of the relaxation type. In this yaw suspension the
bogie frame 11 is connected rigidly in yaw by rods 13 to the cross
beam 16 pivoted at 40 to the steering beam. This beam 16 is
restrained in yaw to the steering beam by viscous dampers and
springs, 22 and 23, in series. Thus the whole bogie pivots against
the yaw suspension about the vertical axis provided by pivot
40.
Referring now to FIGS. 5 and 6, this shows an alternative
arrangement to that shown in FIGS. 3 and 4. As far as possible the
same reference numerals have been used for parts having
corresponding parts in the FIGS. 3 and 4 arrangement.
A rigid longitudinal steering beam 24 interconnects the two
adjacent bodies 1 and 2, the vehicle bodies being connected to the
beam by universal joints 25 and interconnected at their adjacent
ends by a universal joint 26. A pair of the transverse beams 16 are
pivotally mounted at their centers to the steering beam 24 at each
end thereof. A pair of load bearing swing arms 13' are pivotally
mounted to the ends of each of the beams 16 and connect to a
respective end frame 11' each end frame carrying a wheelset. A pair
of combined dampers and springs 22/23 are connected between the
beams 16 and the beam 24 as shown in FIG. 6.
An intermediate frame 27 is arranged between the two end frames 11'
and is supported on the end frames 11', being connected thereto at
each end by a pair of vertical links 28 provided with a ball joint
29 at each end. A transverse tie rod 30 or some other device is
connected between each end frame 11' and a longitudinal extension
31 of the intermediate frame 27 and restrains lateral movement but
allows relative longitudinal and yawing movements between the end
frames 11' and the intermediate frame 27. Ball joints 32 are
provided at each end of the tie rod 30. Other forms of vertical
support which do not restrict relative horizontal movement between
the frame 27 and the frames 11' can be used.
A secondary frame 33 is suspended from the side members of
intermediate frame 27 by way of transverse swing links 34 or other
lateral suspension which allow only transverse relative movement
between the secondary frame 33 and the intermediate frame 27. A
vertical spring 35 is arranged between the secondary frame 33 and
the steering beam 24. This spring 35 provides the main vertical
springing for the vehicle.
The secondary frame 33 is restrained relative to the steering beam
24 for example by means of tie rods or guides (not shown) to allow
only vertical and yawing motions of the secondary frame, and hence
the intermediate frame 27, relative to the steering beam 24.
Longitudinal and transverse movements of the secondary frame 33
relative to the steering beam 24 are prevented by these tie rods.
Similarly since the swing links 34 only allow relative transverse
movement between the secondary frame 33 and the intermediate frame
27, the latter is also prevented by the tie rods connected between
the secondary frame and the steering beam, from moving
longitudinally relative to the steering beam 24.
When the vehicle bodies 18 move sideways relative to the wheelsets
in a pure lateral motion when the vehicle is travelling on a
straight section of track, the steering beam 24 also moves
laterally and carries the secondary frame 33 with it by way of the
tie rods. The intermediate frame 27 is tied to the two end frames
11' by the lateral tie rods 30 and is thus prevented from following
this lateral movement of the secondary frame 33 which thus moves
laterally relative to the intermediate frame 27 on its swing links
34. As the beam 24 moves laterally, the two transverse beams 16 are
carried with it and the two pairs of swing arms 13' swing sideways
to a position at an angle to the direction of travel of the
vehicle. This sideways movement of the swing arms 13' causes each
of the frames 11' to move to a short distance longitudinally
towards the beams 16, away from the intermediate frame 27, causing
the vertical links 28 to pivot longitudinally of the track,
outwardly from the frame 27. The lateral tie rod 30 also pivots
relative to the arm 31 on its joints 32.
One or more dampers (not shown) are connected for example between
the steering beam 24 and the intermediate frame 27 to damp out
these lateral movements of the vehicle relative to the
wheelsets.
When the railway vehicle goes round a curve in the track, the
vehicle bodies 1 and 2 and the steering beam 24 move to take up the
position shown in FIG. 1.
If we assume that the vehicle as shown in plan in FIG. 6 is
rounding a curve whose center of curvature is towards the bottom of
the sheet, the vehicle bodies 1 and 2 and the steering beam 24 will
move, relative to the wheelsets, towards the top of the sheet. The
left hand end frame 11' will yaw anti-clockwise and the right hand
end frame 11' clockwise. If the curve is of constant radius both
end frames 11' will yaw, relative to the steering beam 24 by
approximately equal amounts and the intermediate frame 27 will
remain substantially unyawed with respect to the beam 24. The ball
joints 29 at the ends of the vertical links 28 allow the links 28
to move longitudinally so allowing the end frames 11' to yaw
relative to the intermediate frame 27. Each of the end frames 11'
is provided with projecting arms 36 on either side of the arm 31 on
the intermediate frame 27. Resilient members 37 may be positioned
between these arms 36 and each of the arms 31 to control the yawing
movements of the frames 11' relative to the intermediate frame 27.
For yawing movements greater than a predetermined maximum, one of
these resilient members 37 will become fully compressed and further
yawing movement of the wheelset relative to the intermediate frame
27 will be prevented. In this way excessive yawing motions of the
end frames 11' are prevented.
If the radius of the curve is non-uniform, in particular if the
curve is a reverse curve (S-curve), gross yaw misalignments must be
allowed between a longitudinal line joining the wheelset centers
and the steering beam 24. Relative to the beam 24, one frame 11' is
displaced laterally in one direction and the other frame 11' is
displaced in the opposite direction. As a result the intermediate
frame 27 and the secondary frame 33 yaw substantially about the
central point of the beam 24 that is in effect about vertical axis
40. The motions are also accompanied by yawing of the two end
frames 11' so that the two transverse beams 16 are activated by the
swing arms 13' to yaw together in the same sense. Thus the
suspension unit will take up the position of FIG. 3.
Since yaw movements of these beams 16 may be rapid and lead to
substantial angular displacements of the beams, a device is
incorporated into the yaw suspension to ensure that excessive
forces are not generated which could result in derailment. The yaw
suspension comprising springs 23 and dampers 22 is fitted with
blow-off valves in the dampers so that pressures are limited to a
pre-determined maximum. Similarly, if a spring and friction slide
arrangement is used, the `break-out` friction force is set to an
acceptable level.
Thus in the arrangement of FIGS. 5 and 6 the rotations in yaw of
the suspension unit are about an effective vertical axis 40, not an
actual pivot. This is accomplished by combined in-phase yaw
movements of the two beams 16 and anti-phase lateral movements of
frames 11' relative to the steering-beam. The basis of this
suspension unit is the parallel linkage arrangements of beams 16,
arms 13', and frames 11'. An important feature of this suspension
unit is the facility of frames 11' to yaw relative to each other
under the control of springs 37 and links 30, so that the wheelsets
can adopt nearly a radial alignment on curves under the action of
creep forces.
* * * * *