U.S. patent number 3,680,128 [Application Number 05/082,524] was granted by the patent office on 1972-07-25 for receiver with input phase control between antenna and chassis.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Volkers Research Inc.. Invention is credited to Walter K. Volkers, deceased, Edward N. Wille.
United States Patent |
3,680,128 |
Wille , et al. |
July 25, 1972 |
RECEIVER WITH INPUT PHASE CONTROL BETWEEN ANTENNA AND CHASSIS
Abstract
A receiver system including a differential input of which one
end is connected to the antenna and the other end is grounded to
the receiver chassis and a phase control device for adjusting the
phase relationship between the antenna signal and the parasitic
signal extracted from space by the receiver chassis.
Inventors: |
Wille; Edward N. (Locust
Valley, NY), Volkers, deceased; Walter K. (late of Sand
Point, L.I., NY) |
Assignee: |
Volkers Research Inc. (Port
Washington, NY)
|
Family
ID: |
10270539 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/082,524 |
Filed: |
October 20, 1970 |
Related U.S. Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Application
Number |
Filing Date |
Patent Number |
Issue Date |
|
|
648298 |
Jun 23, 1967 |
|
|
|
|
Foreign Application Priority Data
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 23, 1966 [GB] |
|
|
28,117/66 |
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
343/702; 343/745;
343/720 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H04B
1/18 (20130101); H01Q 1/528 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
H01Q
1/52 (20060101); H01Q 1/00 (20060101); H04B
1/18 (20060101); H01q 001/24 () |
Field of
Search: |
;343/702,829,847,720,745 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Lieberman; Eli
Parent Case Text
This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 648,298 filed June
23, 1967.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A receiver system comprising a power cord; a differential input
device having a pair of input terminals said power cord being
connected to one of said input terminals to serve as a monopole
antenna structure; a parasitic antenna structure including the
receiver chassis connected to the other of said input terminals,
the signals from said parasitic antenna structure having a random
phase relationship with the signals from said power cord antenna
structure; and an adjustable phase control device connected between
one of said antenna structures and its associated input terminal
for adjusting the phase of the signal from said antenna structure
to bring about an additive phase relationship with the signal from
the other of said structures.
2. The receiver system of claim 1, wherein said adjustable phase
control device is connected between said power cord antenna
structure and its associated input terminal.
3. The receiver system of claim 2, wherein said adjustable phase
control device comprises a variable inductor.
4. The receiver system of claim 2, wherein said adjustable phase
control device comprises a variable capacitor.
Description
This invention concerns the elimination of signal cancellation
problems due to randomly phased multiple signal entries into a
receiver. Such multiple entries are not limited to the case of a
dipole antenna feeding differential signals into the input
terminals of a receiver, but also occur in a seemingly single-ended
input which, in reality, is differential in nature due to the
incidental or parasitic signal extraction from space by the
receiver chassis. Thus, the performance of a simple monopole
antenna, connected in single-ended fashion to a receiver's input,
can be substantially diminished, if the signal which it delivers to
the ungrounded terminal is nearly in phase and nearly equal in
amplitude with the signal appearing at the "grounded" terminal,
resulting from the capacitive and inductive linkage of the chassis
with space. This undesirable phenomenon is more frequently observed
with small, portable, battery-operated receivers and is usually
explained as the result of an "insufficient counterpoise." This
insufficiency may be interpreted not so much as the result of a
lack of "mass" but as the result of an ability, possessed by the
counterpoise, to act as an antenna itself, and to phase itself
unfavorably.
Another frequently observed example of signal cancellations due to
antenna action of a "grounded" chassis occurs in small,
line-operated FM and television receivers. Intentional or
incidental, capacitive grounding of the power cords to the chassis
can, at certain frequencies, greatly increase the ability of the
chassis to develop large signal amplitudes. These signals can have
any random phase relationship with reference to the antenna
signals, thereby either effectively enhancing them or cancelling
them.
In accordance with the present invention, such accidental signal
cancellation, can be avoided if one of the two signal sources,
preferably the antenna is equipped with a phase control, which may
be adjusted for optimum or acceptable performance, whenever
spurious cancellation of signals degrades the performance of the
receiver.
The phase control may assume various forms. In some forms it may
resemble, and even be physically identical with conventionally
frequency-tuning or trimming controls. But the present phase
control differs functionally from conventional controls. The
conventional frequency-tuning control may be distinguished from the
present phase control by means of a simple test. According to this
test, the phase control is kept in a fixed position, and either the
amplitude or phase, or both, of the unwanted signal reference,
i.e., the false ground, or "counterpose," is changed by suitable
means which will be described later. If a change is observed in the
signal amplitude anywhere within the receiver, the ground or
counterpoise is sufficiently unstable to make itself an inadvertent
participant in signal interception (parasitic dipole effect). Thus
it is seen that the dominant function of the present tuning control
is phase shifting, while frequency selection, for reasons explained
in the introduction, is of secondary importance.
Another common cause of parasitic phase shifts in seemingly
single-ended (monopole) antenna systems is found in the various
reactive properties of differential input circuits and coupling
elements, and, more particularly, in their non-symmetries.
Single-ended or monopole reception with differential input
terminals, one of which is "grounded" to the chassis, is commonly
used in receivers that are equipped for alternate reception by
dipole roof antenna and by indoor monopole antenna. Portable FM and
television receivers are typical examples of this dual mode of
antenna operation. Severe phase-errors are commonly encountered in
such receivers when changing over from dipole to monopole
operation. A phase control, in accordance with our invention, can
be employed to re-establish proper phase relationships, and thus
avoid spurious signal cancellations.
The principles of the present invention will be more fully
understood by reference to the preferred embodiments set forth in
the following detailed description and illustrated in the
accompanying drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a receiver system illustrating the
parasitic antenna properties of an imperfect counterpoise.
FIG. 2 shows the vectorial subtraction of the antenna signal with a
parasitic counterpoise signal having a random phase relation to the
antenna signal.
FIG. 3 shows the vectorial subtraction of the antenna signal with a
parasitic counterpoise signal in phase opposition to the antenna
signal.
FIG. 4 shows the vectorial subtraction of the antenna signal with a
parasitic counterpoise signal in phase identity with the antenna
signal.
FIG. 5 shows a receiver system with a power cord which tends to
increase the parasitic antenna-action of the chassis.
FIG. 6 shows an electronic differential input for a receiver and a
phase control according to the present invention.
FIG. 7 shows a receiver with differential input transformer and a
phase control.
FIGS. 8-11 show receiver systems in which adjustable single-step
L/C circuits are used to control the phase relationship between the
principal and parasitic antenna signals.
FIG. 12 shows a receiver including a dual purpose phase control
circuit which is simultaneously effective in two widely separated
frequency bands.
FIGS. 13-15 show receiver systems in which adjustable positive
delay lines are employed for the purpose of phase control.
FIGS. 16-18 show receiver systems in which adjustable negative
delay lines are employed for the purpose of phase control.
FIG. 1 shows, on its left side, the principal components of a
receiver, as they are related to our invention, and on the right
side a vertical E field potential distribution curve and its
linkage with the receiver. The abscissa of this curve, though
horizontal, represents the vertically polarized E-field intensity,
referred to ground, in a horizontal, equipotential plane which is
parallel to the earth or ground contour 1. The lumped mass of the
receiver's chassis 2 is shown as having an equivalent antenna
height 3, above earth, causing it to assume, at a given moment, a
signal potential e.sub.1, with reference to ground. A second, in
this instance larger, potential e.sub.2 is developed by the antenna
5 at its equivalent height 4. In order to simplify the analysis of
potential distribution through the remaining shown components of
the receiver, it shall be assumed that they are so close to each
other potential differences between them can be neglected, or that
their linkage with the vertical E-field has already been taken into
consideration by selection of the chassis' effective antenna height
3.
Power source 6 which may be, for example, a battery, energizes the
receiver 7. Input coupler 8 may be, for instance, an antenna
transformer. Connected between the ungrounded input terminal 9 of
input coupler 8 and the output terminal 10 of antenna 5 is the
adjustable phase control 11, which may be shorted out by switch 12,
to demonstrate its effectiveness as explained above.
Various types of phase control devices may be employed within the
scope of the invention, such as, for example, adjustable positive
or negative delay lines.
The function of phase control 11 can best be understood by assuming
that shorting switch 12 is first in its closed position, as shown,
and then is opened. When phase control 11 is shorted, antenna 5 is
connected directly to the ungrounded terminal 9 of input coupler 8.
The effective input voltage appearing between terminal 9 of input
coupler 8 and chassis 2 would normally be assumed to be e.sub.2
-e.sub. 1, as indicated by the bracket on the right side of FIG. 1.
In reality this voltage is subject to both the difference between
the magnitudes of e.sub.2 and e.sub.1 and their relative phase
displacement.
If the two vectors e.sub.1 and e.sub. 2 are displaced in phase, as
shown in FIG. 2, the resulting differential signal e.sub.2 -e.sub.1
increases with increasing phase displacement. The differential
signal e.sub. 2 -e.sub. 1 reaches its maximum when the vectors
e.sub.1 and e.sub.2 are in phase opposition as shown in FIG. 3.
At the other extreme, a signal minimum, or total signal
cancellation, can occur when the two vectors are equal in length
and in phase, as illustrated in FIG. 4. This extreme does not occur
as rarely as may first be assumed, although its occurrence presumes
equal signal extraction from space by both the antenna and the
chassis complex. The following mechanisms, jointly or individually,
can bring this about:
a. Wave-tilting, caused by re-radiators or reflectors in the
receiver's vicinity, can put the chassis-complex on an "equal
footing" with the antenna, causing both to extract identical and
in-phase signals from space.
b. Since the antenna will only rarely be located directly in line
with the chassis' electrical center line and the direction of
polarization of the incoming signal wave, many odd or random
relationships between these three geometrical parameters can,
accidentally, bring about the signal cancellations which are so
often observed.
c. Time delays between the signals delivered by the antenna and the
chassis in a non-tilted field can, accidentally, be such that, in a
tilted field, they cancel themselves against extra time delays
between antenna and chassis, created by wave tilting.
d. An originally horizontally polarized wave has a tendency to tilt
itself vertically as it covers large distances near earth. It can
therefore, in the course of its travel, assume almost any
polarization angle which may then cause the observed
cancellations.
Although there are many other causes for signal cancellation, the
foregoing examples should suffice to illustrate how the signal
extracting capabilities of the receiver chassis can cause serious
cancellations of the useful antenna signal.
It should be noted however that the signal extracting capabilities
of the chassis may be greatly enhanced by combination with a power
cord as shown in FIG. 5. Since the power cord 22 effectively
extends the maximum effective height or length of the chassis 21,
the overall dimensions of the combination antenna A.sub.2, can, at
certain frequencies, be half a wave length longer than monopole
antenna A.sub.1, thus creating a phase shift of 180.degree. with
reference to antenna A.sub.1. Accidental vertical and horizontal
placement of the power cord 22 provides a larger number of random
phase and amplitude variations of the parasitic signal. According
to the present invention phase control 23, in series with monopole
antenna A.sub.1, may be used to avoid accidental signal
cancellation between the signals from antenna A.sub.1 and
chassis-power cord combination A.sub.2 or, better, to bring about
signal addition.
FIG. 6 shows a phase control in accordance with the present
invention which is used to avoid accidental signal cancellation in
a receiver having an electronic differential input for alternate
monopole or dipole antenna operation. A dual triode 31 provides the
differential input, its own grids 32 and 33 being connected to
input terminals 34 and 35 via blocking or coupling condensers 36
and 37. The input circuit is shown with change-over provisions for
dipole roof antenna and built-in monopole antenna operation through
two separate pairs of connecting lugs 38, 39 and 40, 41 which
connect either the dipole roof antenna 42 and its transmission line
43 or the built-in monopole antenna 44 and chassis ground 45 to
input terminals 34 and 35. The dual tuning circuitry includes
selector switch decks 46 and 47 which tap inductors 48 and 49 and
tuning capacitors 50 and 51. Phase control trimmer-capacitor 52
makes it possible to shift the phase of the signal in the left
tuning circuit 48, 50 with reference to the right tuning circuit
49, 51, as required by the random phase shifts between the signals
from antenna 44 and chassis 53 in order to avoid signal
cancellation, and to increase the signal between chassis 53 and
antenna 44 as much as possible.
FIG. 7 shows a receiver similar to that shown in FIG. 6 and using
identical component identification numbers wherever applicable,
except that the differential input triode 31 of FIG. 6 has been
replaced by a differential input antenna transformer 61, the
primary 62 of which is connected to input terminals 34 and 35,
while its secondary 63 is grounded to the chassis 53 at point 64
and supplies a single-ended input signal to the grid 32 of the
triode amplifier 31A. Primary 62 may or may not be grounded at its
center 65, as indicated by switch 66. Trimmer-capacitor 52 serves
as the phase control.
In a receiver with a differential input transformer the phase
control of the present invention may require different reactive
components and circuitry than shown in FIGS. 6 and 7, since the
reactive characteristics of an input transformer can vary in many
ways. If the antenna transformer was an ideal transformer, without
stray reactance, stray capacities, hysteresis or eddy current
losses (as in ferrite transformers) etc. the reactive properties of
the input stage which is connected to the transformer secondary,
would simply be reflected directly in the primary, if turn ratio is
1:1, or modified by the square of the turn ratio if other than 1:1.
Practical antenna transformers fall short of the ideal. Practical
transformers can present nearly purely inductive loads at their
input terminals, nearly pure capacitive or nearly pure ohmic loads.
In addition, one input terminal of a practical differential
transformer can present a different type of load than the other.
This odd relationship may often change from frequency band to
frequency band, thus requiring more sophisticated phase control
systems. FIGS. 8-11 illustrate receiver systems including more
complex phase control.
In the receiver of FIG. 8 a choice of two monopole antennas is
provided by switch 81. In its upper position 82 switch 81 connects
a vertical monopole antenna 83 to the upper transformer input
terminal 84. In its lower position 82A, switch 81 connects the
power cord which can act as an antenna to terminal 84. Either of
the two antennas can appear to the transformer 86 like a resistor
87 or 97, an inductor 88, or 98, or like a capacitor 89, or 99. The
input 84 of transformer 86 can also appear to the two antennas,
whichever is being used, as a resistor 101, an inductor 102, or a
condenser 103. Assuming first that the transformer 86 acts as a
resistor 101, the phase of the incoming signal voltage at input
terminal 84, with reference to signal voltage in the chassis 111
and the lower "grounded" transformer input terminal 112, will
depend, among other operating parameters, such as wave tilt and
arrival-delay between chassis and antenna, upon whether the
selected antenna, at the particular frequency, acts as as resistor,
an inductor or a capacitor. If the antenna acts as a resistor, and
its resistance can be considered as being lumped directly next to
the transformer input with no travelling delay, no phase shift will
occur between the antenna and the transformer input 84, yet the
signal may have any phase relationship with the signal delivered by
the chassis 111. If the antenna acts as an inductor, the voltage
drop it creates at the input 84 of the transformer 86 which acts as
before, as a resistor is advanced, because the current flowing
through the inductance is delayed. If the antenna acts as a
capacitor, voltage is delayed because the current is advanced.
These relationships are of interest only in reference to the phase
of the chassis signal which may, or may not, tend to cancel the
antenna signal.
Since a change of the reactive characteristics of the antenna will
change the phase relationship between the antenna signal and the
chassis signal, an inductor or capacitor, in series with the
antenna or in parallel with it, can be used to adjust the phase
relationship, in order to develop maximum amplitude between the
antenna transformer input terminals 84 and 112, or at least to
prevent communication loss due to signal cancellation.
FIG. 8 shows a receiver system including an adjustable inductor 121
in series with the antenna lead, to create a desired phase
shift.
FIG. 9 shows a receiver system including a series trimmer-capacitor
122 in the same circuit location, acting as a phase control.
FIG. 10 shows a receiver system similar to that shown in FIG. 8
except that the phase control is an adjustable inductor 123 in
parallel with the transformer input.
FIG. 11 shows a similar receiver system in which a parallel
capacitor 124 acts as a phase control.
The foregoing explanation of the phase relationships between the
antenna and chassis signals and the changes in these phase
relationships, as reactive components in the antenna leads are
adjusted, was made with the assumption that the input transformer
86 acts as a resistor. But the transformer may also act as an
inductor or as a capacitor as previously indicated. If so, new
phase-combinations are formed but the basic principle of phase
adjustment by means of series or parallel adjustable inductive or
capacitive reactors which are attached to the antenna lead remains
the same.
An important aspect of the present invention is that the phase
control circuits shown in FIGS. 8-11 are not only alternative
choices to fulfil a single purpose, but may be used simultaneously,
if the phase shifts encountered cover so wide a range that they
cannot be handled by one phase control circuit alone. Further, in
accordance with the present invention combinations of phase control
circuits may include coupling and decoupling devices, to separate
frequency bands, as will become apparent from the following
description.
The circuit illustrated in FIG. 12 has been demonstrated to be
capable of simultaneously preventing major signal-cancellations, in
two widely separated frequency bands, such as, for example, the 60
mc band and the 180 mc band. These are typical television
frequencies at which signal cancellations of the type described are
likely to occur. The circuit uses two antennas, one of which is the
power cord 201, while the other is the relatively short monopole
202 which may or may not be capacitively terminated at its end 203.
At 60 mc, and within a broad band around this frequency, the power
cord antenna 201 can be made to operate near resonance where minor
tuning changes create large phase shifts by action of its own
inductance and adjustable "extension inductor" 121. At 180 mc, and
within a broad band around that frequency, antenna 202 can be made
self-resonant by reducing its inherent, excessive inductance,
augmented by the input inductance of transformer 205, by means of
series-capacitor 206 which may or may not be adjustable, as shown
here, or may even be a stray-capacity across inductor 204. It
should be noted that the large inductance of the power cord 201
decouples the power cord 201 from the higher frequency (180 mc)
circuit, while low-frequency inductor 204 ineffectively shunts
capacitor 206. At the same time, when operating at 60 mc, capacitor
206 ineffectively shunts dominating inductor 204, and antenna 202,
due to its small physical dimensions in comparison with the power
cord 201, has little influence upon performance at that lower
frequency.
While the foregoing examples of phase control circuits involved
essentially single, lumped inductors or capacitors, the principles
of the present invention can be effectively carried out by the use
of delay line phase control circuits including adjustable positive
or negative delay lines which can be made to cover a much wider
phase-range than the simple, single-step phase control circuits
shown in FIGS. 5-12 are capable of covering. Further, since a
multi-step delay line can create large phase shifts with negligible
amplitude loss, this type of phase control may, in some instances,
be preferred over the simple, single-step L/C, L/R and C/R phase
controls, previously described.
In the receiver system shown in FIG. 13 power cord 301 acts as the
principal antenna, while chassis 302 acts as a second parasitic
antenna. Phase relations between the two antennas can be corrected,
for optimum performance or at least to avoid signal cancellations,
by means of adjustable L/C delay line 303, which is a positive
(phase retarding) delay line, here shown as a string of five
inductors in series with the power cord antenna 301 and five
capacitors connecting the junctions between the inductors to the
chassis 302.
FIG. 14 shows a receiver system similar to that of FIG. 13, except
that adjustable delay line 303 is inserted in the lower, previously
chassis-grounded transformer input lead, while the upper
transformer input lead 305 is directly connected to the power cord
antenna 301. In the receiver of FIG. 14 phase correction is
achieved in the parasitic signal path and can be as effective as in
the receiver of FIG. 13.
FIG. 15 shows a receiver system wherein the principal antenna is
monopole 306. Delay line 306 is, in this instance, inserted between
two sections of the parasitic antenna system, namely, power cord
301 and chassis 302. The monopole antenna 306 may or may not be
terminated at its free end 307.
FIG. 16 shows a receiver system similar to that of FIG. 13, except
that the positions of the inductors and capacitors of delay line
303 of FIG. 13 have been exchanged, thus making delay line 308 of
FIG. 16 a negative (phase advancing) delay line which may be
equally useful for the purpose of eliminating signal cancellations
and bringing about the optimum phase relationship between the
signals from the principal and parasitic antennas.
FIG. 17 shows a receiver system similar to that of FIG. 14 except
that negative delay line 308 has been substituted for the positive
delay line 303 of FIG. 14.
FIG. 18 shows a receiver system similar to that of FIG. 15 except
that negative delay line 308 has been substituted for the positive
delay line 303 of FIG. 15.
While the principles of the present invention have been illustrated
by reference to a number of examples of specific receiver systems
employing various phase control devices, it will be appreciated by
those skilled in the art that the present invention is not limited
to those examples. It will further be apparent to those skilled in
the art that other modifications and adapatations of the disclosed
systems may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of
the invention as set forth with particularity in the appended
claims.
* * * * *