U.S. patent number 3,675,007 [Application Number 04/867,438] was granted by the patent office on 1972-07-04 for explosion proof lighting fixture.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Appleton Electric Co.. Invention is credited to Norton A. Appleton, Herbert W. Penzel.
United States Patent |
3,675,007 |
Appleton , et al. |
July 4, 1972 |
EXPLOSION PROOF LIGHTING FIXTURE
Abstract
An explosion suppressing vent for an electrical fixture which
includes continuous flame-arresting channel of air space passing
through the fixture wall and connecting air-space within the
fixture with exterior air. Electrical fixtures partially enclosed
by glass, or other relatively fragile membranes, benefit greatly
from the invention since, through its use, maximum internal
pressures during combustion of enclosed potentially explosive gas
mixture is suprisingly low.
Inventors: |
Appleton; Norton A.
(Northfield, IL), Penzel; Herbert W. (Chicago, IL) |
Assignee: |
Appleton Electric Co. (Chicago,
IL)
|
Family
ID: |
25349773 |
Appl.
No.: |
04/867,438 |
Filed: |
October 20, 1969 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
362/363;
362/373 |
Current CPC
Class: |
F21V
25/12 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
F21V
25/12 (20060101); F21V 25/00 (20060101); F21v
025/00 () |
Field of
Search: |
;240/11.2EP,121 ;48/192
;222/189 ;220/88 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Queisser; Richard C.
Assistant Examiner: Smollar; Marvin
Claims
We claim:
1. In an electric light fixture for use in a potentially
combustible atmosphere wherein the fixture comprises a base, a
glass globe below the base, an attachment device connected to the
base and supporting the globe with respect thereto whereby the base
and globe define a light receiving enclosure, said device including
means for venting said enclosure while preventing the propagation
of flame from the enclosure to the exterior of the fixture in the
event of combustion within the enclosure, the improvement wherein
said device comprises:
a first annular generally horizontal flange integral with the
bottom of the base, said flange having a bottom face with a
plurality of annular ridges extending downwardly therefrom and
defining grooves between the ridges;
a second annular generally horizontal flange concentric with and
below said first flange, said second flange having an upper face
with a plurality of annular ridges extending upwardly therefrom and
defining grooves between the ridges thereof;
at least one annular horizontal disc concentric with and between
said flanges, said disc having a top face with annular ridges
extending upwardly therefrom and defining grooves therebetween, and
a bottom face with annular ridges extending downwardly therefrom
and defining grooves therebetween, said ridges and grooves on the
upper and lower faces of the disc interdigitating with the ridges
and grooves of said first and second flanges to define circuitous
passageways radiating in all directions about said fixture and
increasing in volume from the interior end to the exterior end of
the passageways;
said flanges and disc having vertically aligned bosses at spaced
intervals adjacent the interior ends of the passageways, said
bosses being in vertical contact with each other to define the
thickness of said passageways, and
fastening means at each of said bosses, connecting the flanges and
holding said bosses in contact.
2. In an electric fixture as set forth in claim 1, wherein there
are at least two of said discs and the thickness of the passageways
is between 0.25 and 0.35 of an inch, and that said discs and
flanges have at least four ridges.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Industrial electrical fixtures, such as lighting fixtures,
particularly those intended for use in areas classified as
hazardous because of presence of combustible gas, vapor, etc. are
commonly completely enclosed. Part of the enclosure commonly
includes glass or other translucent, relatively fragile material,
and consequently the latter fixtures cannot be subjected to
substantial interior pressures with safety. Explosion suppression
devices heretofore available have been generally expensive to
manufacture. For example, one device which was found to be
satisfactory from a performance viewpoint was a structure which
included a relatively expensive gas-porous metal wall.
Rupture of a glass-containing lighting fixture during the time of
an internal "explosion" would completely nullify the advantage of
providing such a fixture with explosion-resistant or
explosion-suppressing elements. One solution heretofore suggested
has been the utilization of increasingly heavy glass members which
are capable of withstanding elevated internal explosion
pressures.
This invention provides an explosion suppressing structure which is
particularly advantageous in fixtures containing glass or other
relatively fragile materials, as part of the fixture's enclosure
wall. Internal pressures generated by an "explosion" within a
fixture improved in accordance with this invention are rapidly and
effectively dissipated. The result is that during internal
combustion of gas phase within the fixture, the internal pressures
do not reach the level at which the fixture's enclosure wall
members, including glass members, are likely to rupture. In
addition, the internal gas space is vented into the surrounding
atmosphere in such a way that, during an internal combustion of
most explosive mixtures, flame propagation is arrested as the exit
gases safely pass through the enclosure into the air space
surrounding the fixture.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to electrical fixtures for use in areas
classified as hazardous because of the presence of combustible
vapor, gas, or other material. The improved fixtures include means
for venting gases within the fixture through continuous, open,
flame-arresting channels of air space passing through the fixture
wall, said open channels being defined by closely adjacent heat
conducting metal surfaces. The improved fixture includes channels
of such size and number as to eliminate substantial pressure
build-up within the vented fixture during internal combustion
therein of explosive gas mixtures.
DESIGNATION OF THE FIGURES
FIG. 1 is an elevational view, partially in cross-section, of a
light fixture showing portions of the covering elements removed
therefrom, and showing a portion of an explosion-suppressing
venting structure of this invention in cross-section.
FIG. 2 is a fragmentary cross-sectional view taken approximately
along the line 2--2 in FIG. 1.
FIG. 3 is an enlarged cross-sectional view showing the mating of
some of the channel forming components in accordance with this
invention.
FIG. 4 is a fragmentary cross-sectional view taken approximately
along the line 4--4 of FIG. 1.
DESCRIPTION OF A PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
Although the following disclosure offered for public dissemination
in return for the grant of a patent, is detailed to ensure adequacy
and aid understanding, this is not intended to prejudice that
purpose of a patent which is to cover each new inventive concept
therein no matter how others may later disguise it by variations in
form or additions or further improvements. The claims at the end
hereof are intended as the chief aid toward this purpose; as it is
these that meet the requirement of pointing out the parts,
improvements, or combinations in which the inventive concepts are
found.
The improvement of this invention is particularly useful in
connection with electrical fixtures such as a light fixture
generally 10 having a base portion 11 enclosing electrical
connectors 12, and other electrical components such as socket 13
and bulb 14. Socket 13 is mounted on a plug 17 threaded into end
component 16. Fixture 10 also includes a glass cover 15. Glass
cover 15 is affixed to base section 11 by suitable attachment means
generally 20 for hermetically sealing interface 21 between glass
cover 15 and base portion 11. Mouth 22 in base 11 includes
conventional means for sealing base 11 onto a conduit, pipe, etc.,
(not shown because not part of the invention). Vent section
generally 23 provides the only venting of fixture 10. Since the
electrical elements, glass cover means and guard bars 24 are
conventional they will not be discussed in further detail herein.
Cone shaped cover 25 protects vent section 23 from occlusion, e.g.,
due to maintenance painting, etc. Fixture 10 is attached to
mounting 27 by means of threads 39.
Sidewall, generally 26 of base section 11, mounting 27, and glass
cover 15 preferably enclose air spaces 28, 28' in which all the
internal elements of the fixture reside. Plug 17 divides the
interior of the fixture into two pneumatically separated spaces 28
and 28'.
In the illustrated embodiment, threaded end-component 16 of base
portion 11 is cast to include a first flange 30 having concentric
spaced-apart flat bottomed grooves 31 in face 32 of flange 30.
Circular disc-like element 35 has flat topped ribs 37 extending
from face 36 which is shown in FIGS. 1 and 3 as the upper face. The
surfaces of flat topped ribs 37 are dimensioned and positioned to
reside in, but be spaced-apart from the surfaces of flat bottomed
grooves 31 in flange 30. All ribs, e.g. 37, and grooves, e.g. 31,
are tapered in the illustrated embodiment but are not necessarily
so. It is essential however, that opposing surfaces be maintained
spaced-apart to define a plurality of zig-zag passageways 38
between the interior space 28 and the exterior of the fixture.
Means for maintaining the surfaces in spaced-apart condition in the
illustrated embodiment are discussed hereinafter. Grooves 41 are
positioned in bottom surface 40 of disc-like insert 35 in a
configuration which is substantially identical to that of grooves
31 in flange 30, and, moreover the entire lower surface of discs
35, 35' are identical to the lower surface of face 32 of flange 30.
Flange 30 includes interiorly extending planar element 43.
Second disc-like element 35', identical to element 35, may be mated
with and maintained spaced-apart from element 35 as
illustrated.
The other end component 45 of base portion 11 also includes a
medial flange 46 having face 47. From face 47 of flange 46 extend
concentric flat topped ribs 48 having a configuration substantially
identical to ribs 37. Hence, ribs 48 mate with, i.e. reside in, and
are spaced-apart from, the walls of grooves 31 or grooves 41.
It will be appreciated that in those preferred embodiments of this
invention in which disc elements 35, 35' are substantially
identical, any number of such elements may be stacked one on the
other as illustrated to provide greater or smaller amount of
venting of interior space 28 in accordance with this invention. The
amount of venting required will depend, among other things, on the
volume of enclosed gas space 28. It is preferred however that at
least two disc-like elements or inserts 35, 35' be used in a
lighting fixture.
Interior planar element 43 of flange 30 is drilled through boss 50
to receive bolts 51. Interior planar elements 53 and 53' of discs
35, 35' include bosses 49 and 49' which are also drilled to receive
bolts 51. Flange 46 has an interior planar element 32 with bosses
50 which also surround bolts 51. When the end flanges and
inter-positioned disc-like members are assembled or stacked as
illustrated, dependent spacer shoulders 50, 50' bear against bosses
49' thereby defining the thickness of passageway 38.
When ring 35 is seated as illustrated on flange 30 so that ribs 37
reside somewhat within grooves 31, all opposing faces of disc-like
element 35 and flange 30 except the butting surfaces of the bosses
defining spacers 50 and bosses 49' are maintained in a spaced-apart
condition thereby forming a continuous channel or passageway 38 of
air-space connecting enclosed space 28 with the air external to the
fixture. Placement of a second disc 35' on the other flange 46
likewise brings about an abutment of spacer elements 50' with
bosses 49'. Thus, between each of the components is maintained an
air channel 38, 38', etc., which forms a continuous, zig-zag
passageway between interior space 28 and air external to the
fixture. The means, described above to maintain discs 35, 35'
spaced-apart from flanges 30, 46 are used to maintain all discs
spaced-apart from each other as well, discs 35, 35' being
identical. Flanges 46 and 30 and circular disc-like elements 35,
35', etc. are maintained in a fixed position relative to one
another by means of bolts 51 passing through holes 57, and by
abutment of spacers 50 and shoulders 49'. The fact that these
passageways 38 are circuitous (e.g., zig-zag) provides a large
cooling surface to cool the gas therein and prevent the propagation
of flame from the interior space 28 to the exterior.
PERFORMANCE AND TESTS
In tests actually performed on fixtures in accordance with this
invention, ethyl ether vapor explosions deliberately detonated
within chamber 28 were found to be suppressed in the sense that gas
pressure in air space 28 did not exceed 45 pounds per square inch
and in preferred embodiments, did not exceed 20 PSIG. Equally
important, the same explosive vapors which were maintained external
to the fixture during the test were not ignited by gases passing
through channels 50 into the surrounding explosive atmosphere
during the internal "explosion" or flash.
In these tests it was found that adding two inserts 35, 35' to a
fixture of this invention reduced the average peak internal
pressure and the maximum peak internal pressure to values which are
approximately half of that encountered in the embodiment with no
insert 35, 35'. Reducing the number of concentric grooves and
tongues from five to four was found to have a much smaller effect,
if any, on the peak pressures encountered inside the apparatus
during a flash therein.
For the following tests a fixture described in the attached drawing
was drilled and tapped for connection to (1) supply lines carrying
air and an explosive mixture into the fixture interior, (2) spark
plugs, (3) pressure recording device, and (4) gas sampling line.
The test fixture was installed in a test chamber having another
inlet and an outlet connection to the supply line leading from a
carburetor system which produced the explosive test gas mixture. A
window was provided in the test chamber for observing the fixture
during the test. The explosion tests were conducted in the
following manner. Explosive ethyl ether vapor-air mixtures were
introduced into the fixtures device, and the device was flushed
with the explosive mixture until the original air had been
displaced. Samples of the explosive vapor-air mixtures were
withdrawn for analysis from (1) the pipe carrying the explosive
mixture, (2) the test chamber, and (3) the interior of the fixture.
The inlet and outlet connection to the device and to the test
chamber were then closed and the mixture within the fixture ignited
by means of a spark plug. The device was observed during each test
for the appearance of sparks or flame, and to determine whether the
explosive mixture in the test chamber ignited. Internal pressures
were recorded. At the conclusion of each test the products of the
combustion were removed from the device by means of a stream of
air.
The following series of tests were conducted using the above
described equipment.
TEST SERIES NUMBER 1
In these series the vent structure tested was the same as that
employed in the fixture illustrated in the attached drawings except
that no inserts 35, 35' were present therein. Five concentric
grooves and tongues were provided in the assembly, the total
clearance between the walls of each opposing tongue and groove
being 0.040 inch. A plurality of spot spacer discs or shims 0.020
inch thick were provided at several points between the crest of the
tongue and its opposing surface to provide a 0.020 inch spacing at
this section of the path. A 200 watt 28 amp lamp, not lighted, was
installed in the fixture. Ignition of the explosive mixtures was
obtained by means of the spark plug inside the fixture.
TEST SERIES NUMBER 2
The conditions and spacing were the same as Test Series Number 1
except that one insert 35 was added to increase the internal
venting area to twice that provided in Test Series Number 1. The
clearances were as described in Test Series Number 1.
TEST SERIES NUMBER 3
Same as Test Series Number 2 except that one additional disc insert
35 was added to increase internal venting area to three times that
provided in Test Series Number 1, i.e. a total of two inserts were
employed in Series Number 3.
TEST SERIES NUMBER 4
Same as Test Series Number 3 except that the spot spacer shims
0.025 inch thick were provided at several points between the crest
of the tongues and the bottom of the grooves to provide 0.025 inch
spacings at this section of the path, i.e. between crest and
opposing bottom.
TEST SERIES NUMBER 5
Same as Test Series Number 3 except that one full tongue and groove
was removed from the assembly of each insert. Four concentric
tongues and grooves were provided in this test series.
TEST SERIES NUMBER 6
Same as Test Series Number 5 except that 0.025 inch thick spot
shims as provided in Test Series Number 4 were used.
TEST SERIES NUMBER 7
Same as Test Series Number 6 except that the total clearance
between each tongue and groove was increased to 0.070 inch and
U-shaped spacers 0.035 inch thick were provided in each groove to
maintain clearances.
The data results of the above tests are summarized in Table I in
which all spacings are expressed in inches and all pressures are
pounds per square inch gage.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TABLE I
number test of number spacings highest* average** series discs of
wall-crest- explosion explosion number 35 grooves wall bottom
pressure pressure
__________________________________________________________________________
1(6)*** none 5 0.020 0.020 41 36 2(6) one 5 0.020 0.020 32 24 3(10)
two 5 0.020 0.020 23 18 4(11) two 5 0.020 0.025 23 27 5(3) two 4
0.020 0.020 28 26 6(6) two 4 0.020 0.025 29 25 7(26) two 4 0.035
0.035 16 13
__________________________________________________________________________
total (68) *Maximum maximum pressure **Average maximum pressure
***Number in parenthesis is number of tests in the series.
In not one single instance in the tests of any of the above series
did the explosion within the fixture propagate to the vapor in the
test chamber surrounding the fixture. Thus, the above seven series
of tests which included 68 individual tests showed 100 percent
effectiveness with respect to arresting explosion occurring within
the fixture, preventing its propagation to an explosive air mixture
surrounding the fixture.
In an additional series of tests the test apparatus and conditions
of Test Series Number 7 were repeated except that, instead of an
ethyl ether explosive mixture, an explosive mixture of hydrogen and
air was used, and 7 concentric tongues and grooves were present in
the assembly. It was found that maximum internal explosion
pressures ranged from 74 PSIG to 100 PSIG, and that in every
instance, the internal explosion propagated through the vent
assembly causing an explosion in the atmosphere surrounding the
fixture.
Thus, even though the various embodiments of the apparatus of this
invention were found to be 100 percent effective in explosive ethyl
ether vapor-containing atmospheres, in the above tests, the fixture
tested in the hydrogen-air mixture was not effective with respect
to preventing propagation of internal explosions to the surrounding
atmosphere when those atmospheres were a mixture of hydrogen and
air. Consequently, the described fixture of this invention is of
considerable utility, even though it is not effective in what are
considered to be the most severe conditions, e.g., conditions
falling within Underwriter Laboratory "A" and "B" classification,
namely acetylene-air, and hydrogen-air mixtures, respectively. Most
fixtures are directed for use in conditions falling within, or
below, Underwriters' "C" or "D" groupings, e.g., ethyl ether-air,
or gasoline-air mixtures.
DISCUSSION
It is clear from the experimental data disclosed hereinbefore that
an extremely large number of variations are possible in the
spacings, the number of tongues and grooves, the number of discs,
and the types and explosivity of gas mixtures. Also, much variation
in the volume of gas enclosed in fixtures is possible. Having been
taught the general principles of manufacturing a safe article in
accordance with this invention, one with ordinary skill in the art
can now perform routine tests and exercise ordinary judgement in
utilizing variables in order to settle on specifics involved in
particular embodiments which are safe for use with a particular gas
mixture. For example we have found that, using explosive mixtures
of ethyl-ether and air, an embodiment of this invention utilizing
five rings of tongues and grooves, with 0.015 inch spacing between
opposing faces, generates pressures which are too high in the sense
that the numerical values were higher than desired, even though no
mechanical failure of the fixture occurred. We have found that in
those lighting fixtures of the type described hereinbefore in which
25 PSIG maximum internal pressure is considered tolerable, the use
of five tongues and grooves at spacings of 0.025 and 0.035 are
entirely satisfactory, and the use of four tongues and grooves with
spacings at 0.035 inch are also satisfactory. Broadly speaking
however spacings in the range 0.015 to 0.040 inch inclusive, are
useful in accordance with this invention. However, generally
speaking, it is preferred that the number of tongues and grooves
utilized be not less than four. Again, generally speaking, the
spacings must be large enough, and the channels must be in
sufficient number to prevent excessive internal pressure build-up,
e.g. much above 25 PSIG, and the length of the path, and the number
of changes of direction in the path of a gas in transversing the
path must be sufficient to cool and quench the flame front as it
passes through the channel in order to prevent propagation of the
flame or explosion into the air space surrounding the fixture.
As seen in FIG. 2, for a sector about the vertical axis of the
fixture the volume of the passageway is the smallest at the inner
end of the passageway and becomes increasingly greater toward the
outer end of the passageway. Thus, with a build-up of pressure in
the fixture (as by reason of an explosion therein) that pressure
will exert its greatest force tending to separate the parts of the
passageway at the inner end of the passageway, with progressively
less force (on the walls about the passageway) toward the outer end
of the passageway. The fastening means (bolts 51) are immediately
adjacent the inner end of the passageway.
* * * * *