U.S. patent number 3,645,216 [Application Number 05/006,758] was granted by the patent office on 1972-02-29 for safes and similar security structures.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Chubb & Son's Lock and Sale Company Limited. Invention is credited to Ronald J. Brown, Arthur S. Radford.
United States Patent |
3,645,216 |
Radford , et al. |
February 29, 1972 |
SAFES AND SIMILAR SECURITY STRUCTURES
Abstract
A slab or panel for use in a safe or similar structure comprises
a layer of material resistant to drilling and other forms of
mechanical attack backed by a layer of material, preferably
graphite, which melts and vaporizes but does not substantially
react exothermically with oxygen at the temperatures generated by a
thermic lance, i.e., of the order of 3,000.degree. C. The melting
and vaporization involves the provision of such large amounts of
latent heat thus taking several times as long to burn a hole
through the slab. The material for resisting mechanical attack
preferably comprises nuggets of heard material in a ductile metal
matrix and a convenient form of construction there is a single
layer of this material and a single layer of the vaporizable
material. The vaporizable material is preferably in the form of
blocks of triangular section fitted into compartments defined by
metallic spacing members supported between a pair of steel
plates.
Inventors: |
Radford; Arthur S.
(Wolverhampton, EN), Brown; Ronald J. (Oakengates,
EN) |
Assignee: |
Chubb & Son's Lock and Sale
Company Limited (Wolverhampton, Staffordshire,
EN)
|
Family
ID: |
9801520 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/006,758 |
Filed: |
January 29, 1970 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 3, 1969 [GB] |
|
|
5,728/69 |
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
109/82; 428/408;
428/117 |
Current CPC
Class: |
E05G
1/024 (20130101); Y10T 428/24157 (20150115); Y10T
428/30 (20150115) |
Current International
Class: |
E05G
1/00 (20060101); E05G 1/024 (20060101); E05g
001/02 () |
Field of
Search: |
;109/80,81,82,83,84,24,29 ;161/213 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Machado; Reinaldo P.
Claims
We claim:
1. A safe having at least one wall including a slab comprising a
continuous face layer, said face layer being of drill-resisting
material and comprising nuggets having at least the hardness of
fused alumina embedded in a ductile metal matrix, a backing layer
of material which melts and vaporizes but does not substantially
react exothermically with oxygen at temperatures of the order of
3,000.degree. C., and means additional to said face layer for
supporting said backing layer behind said face layer.
2. A slab according to claim 1, comprising a single layer of
drill-resisting material and a single layer of vaporizable
material.
3. A slab according to claim 1 in which said vaporizable material
is graphite.
4. A slab according to claim 1 in which said face layer comprises a
ductile metal matrix and nuggets of hard material in said metal
matrix.
5. A safe having at least one wall including a slab comprising a
continuous face layer, said face layer being of drill-resisting
material, and a backing layer, said backing layer including
metallic spacing members defining at least in part a plurality of
compartments of regular cross section, and a plurality of bars of a
material which melts and vaporizes but does not substantially react
exothermically with oxygen at temperatures of the order of
3,000.degree. C., said bars being of corresponding cross section to
said compartments and being located in said compartments.
6. A slab according to claim 5, in which said blocks are of
triangular cross section and said spacing members are inclined to a
plane perpendicular to the surface of said backing layer.
7. A slab according to claim 6, including a pair of steel plates
forming the outer sides of said compartments, said spacing members
being supported by said plates.
8. A slab according to claim 7 in which said spacing members are
secured to said steel plates at a spacing of approximately eight
inches.
Description
This invention relates to safes and similar security structures
such as strong rooms and is particularly concerned with a
construction of slab or panel for use either in the doors or walls
of such structures. With the continued improvement in safe-breaking
equipment it is necessary that corresponding improvements should be
made in the structures themselves. One of the developments in this
field is the thermic lance which is capable of developing very high
temperatures of the order of 3,000.degree. C. associated with a
high level of heat output in a readily controllable form. Such a
device is capable of burning through any known material but the
resultant hole is relatively small and it is necessary to burn a
ring of such holes before it is possible to lift out a sufficient
portion of a door or wall to gain access to the interior of a safe
or the structure. If sufficient time and equipment is available
there is no known form of structure which can entirely resist the
action of such a device.
According to the present invention a slab or panel for use in a
safe or similar structure comprises a layer of drill-resisting
material which is backed by a layer of material which melts and
vaporizes but does not react substantially exothermically with
oxygen at the high temperatures involved of the order of
3,000.degree. C. as mentioned above. The outer layer provides the
resistance to mechanical attack, which is not necessarily by
drilling, but may be by punching, for example. The term "
drill-resisting" is used for convenience to indicate resistance to
any form of mechanical attack. The effect of the nature of the
layer of backing material is that, in the oxygen-rich environment
provided by a thermic lance, the material does not readily burn out
but as just mentioned merely melts and vaporizes. This melting and
vaporization involves the provision of such large amounts of latent
heat that the operating temperature of the device is maintained
only at the expense of increased consumption of lance and oxygen.
The material is, of course, gradually removed in either a molten or
vapor state and a hole will eventually be made right through the
slab or panel, but it is found that this takes several times as
long as it does to make a hole through a similar thickness of
material at present used for such a slab or panel. The speed at
which the material is removed is found to depend on a number of
parameters including thermal conductivity, specific heat, latent
heat of fusion and of vaporization, melting point and resistance to
thermal shock.
Depending on the particular duty involved and costs consistent with
this duty it is possible to calculate the necessary properties of
the ideal material on the basis of these factors. In practice the
material which best meets the majority of operating requirements is
graphite but depending on the circumstances other materials such as
tantalum, titanium or zirconium or compounds or mixtures of these
elements or of the ores in which they naturally occur, having
physical properties appropriate to the degree of resistance
desired, may be used.
The layer of drill-resisting material is preferably in the form of
nuggets of hard material embedded in a ductile metal matrix, e.g.,
nuggets of aloxite in a copper matrix. This layer provides the
external protection against mechanical attack but offers little
resistance to the action of a thermic lance. A hole can therefore
be burnt in this outer layer comparatively rapidly but as soon as
the hole extends as far as the backing layer the penetration is
slowed down to a major extent for the reasons already described.
The layer of drill-resisting material is, however, essential so as
to protect the front face of the slab or panel from mechanical
attack. Most simply a single layer of this drill-resisting material
is backed by a single layer of vaporizable material and such a
construction is found to be adequate for the majority of
applications. Under some circumstances, however, for example,
strong room doors of a greater than usual thickness more than one
double layer may be provided with advantage. For example the double
layer of drill-resisting material and vaporizing material may
merely be duplicated and indeed any required number of such double
layers may be provided. Alternatively intermediate layers of other
materials may also be included, the only overriding requirement
being that the face which is intended to define the front of the
slab or panel is made of a layer of drill-resisting material while
at some spacing to the rear of this is at least one layer of
vaporizing material.
In a particular construction it may take 10 or 12 times as long to
pierce a hole through the slab. This not only needs a
correspondingly greater number of thermic lances together with
associated equipment such as oxygen cylinders all of which is
difficult to transport to the site, but the time required for the
operation as a whole, i.e., the burning of a sufficient number of
holes to obtain access to the interior of the safe is extended to
such an extent that in the majority of cases it may well be
unacceptable. In other words, although it is still possible
eventually to gain access to the interior of the safe the time
required is so much longer that in the majority of cases the
operation as a whole becomes impracticable.
Particularly when graphite is used as the vaporizable material it
is convenient for it to be fitted in the form of blocks which may
be fabricated by sintering, fusing, casting and so forth. By making
these blocks of a regular cross section they may be fitted together
so as to form a virtually continuous layer with relatively small
airspaces. For this purpose the individual blocks may be fitted
into compartments at least partly defined by metal spacing members.
The most convenient cross section for this purpose is triangular in
which case the spacing members may be inclined to a plane
perpendicular to the surface of the layer of the material. This
enables the spacing members to perform a secondary function in
impeding the burning of a hole through the layer. Since the spacing
members are inclined to the direction of a hole which is burnt the
heat impinging on a spacing member as soon as the graphite has been
removed to a sufficient extent, tends to be conducted away by the
spacing member, and owing the the inclination of the latter the
direction of the hole itself tends to be correspondingly diverted.
As a result the hole is forced to penetrate a greater thickness of
graphite and moreover the fact that successive holes do not extend
directly through the thickness of the slab makes it more difficult
to obtain the necessary accuracy to remove a complete section of
the complex construction of slab. For this reason it is generally
necessary to burn a larger number of holes than would otherwise be
necessary before the section as a whole can be removed and this
makes the operation as a whole take even longer and entails the
consumption of larger quantities of lance and oxygen.
A construction of complex slab or panel in accordance with the
invention will now be described in more detail with reference to
the accompanying drawings in which:
FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view, and,
FIG. 2 is a perspective view to a reduced scale illustrating the
manner of assembly.
The composite slab shown in the drawings comprises only a single
layer of drill-resisting material and a single layer of vaporizable
material. This is found to be adequate for a large number of
general applications but as already described it may be desirable
to provide a multilayer construction comprising a number of the
double layer units shown in FIG. 1 or alternatively a combination
of the individual layers shown in FIG. 1 with layers of other
material. In FIG. 1 a layer of drill-resisting material is
indicated generally as 1 while a layer of vaporizable material,
graphite in this particular example, is shown as 2. The two layers
are separated by a gap 3 which in the example shown is left empty
to form an airspace. It is, however, possible to fill this gap with
some other material to form the kind of multilayer construction
referred to above.
Turning now to the details of the construction the layer 1
comprises a central portion 4 consisting of nuggets of aloxite in a
copper matrix. The size of the nuggets is not critical but in a
particular example in which the thickness of the copper matrix is
approximately an inch and a half the average size of the nuggets
may be approximately half an inch. The central portion 4 is bonded
to a mild steel plate 5 by angle brackets 6 extending from the
surface of the plate. On the front side of the layer 4 is a further
mild steel plate 8 which is supported by sideplates 9 and 10 so
that there is a narrow airgap between the plate 8 and the layer 4.
The components 4, 5 and 8 together make up a composite
drill-resisting layer.
The layer 2 is made up of blocks 12 of graphite of triangular
section as shown, which are preformed and individually inserted
into compartments defined by spacing members 13 and by front and
backplates 14 and 15. Apart from the two blocks at the ends of the
section the remaining blocks are all in the form of isosceles
right-angled triangles so that the angles at the base of each
triangle are 45.degree. and the spacing members 13 extend at
45.degree. to the plane perpendicular to the surface of the layer.
During assembly the spacing members 13, which may be for example of
mild steel or copper, are first welded to the plate 14 as shown by
the welds 18. The plate 15 is then fitted subsequently and is
secured to the apices of the triangles defined by the spacing
members 13 by welds 19 made through corresponding holes in the
plate 15. The preformed blocks of graphite are then inserted in the
compartments thus defined, being slid in from one end as
illustrated in FIG. 2. One end plate, not seen in the drawings, is
first welded in position at the bottom as seen in FIG. 2, after
which the blocks 12 are slid into position and the upper end plate
20 is fitted in position, being held by means of welds made through
holes 21 connecting with the plate 5.
If the construction shown in FIG. 1 is acted on by a thermic lance
the layer 1 is penetrated relatively easily. The gap 3 is then
encountered and this allows the heat to spread laterally thus
reducing the concentration of heat on the layer 2. The graphite
will, however, eventually be heated to a temperature at which it
melts and vaporizes but owing to the fact that it does not react
exothermally with the oxygen present it does not readily burn and
therefore is effectively removed only by the melting and vaporizing
which as previously mentioned involves the provision of large
amounts of latent heat. When the hole eventually reaches one of the
spacing members 13 the spacing member tends to conduct the heat
away so that the hole tends to deflect in the general direction of
the spacing member, i.e., at an angle of about 45.degree.. This
causes the hole to penetrate a greater thickness of graphite so
that a further large quantity of latent heat has to be provided.
Eventually, however, the hole will penetrate right through the
composite slab.
A single hole will not, of course, be sufficient for purposes of
access and it is necessary to burn a number of holes before the
section as a whole can be removed. Owing to the devious and
unpredictable courses of individual holes a considerably larger
number is required than would otherwise be necessary. Difficulty of
access is further increased by appropriate spacing of the welding
points 18 of the spacing members 13 and it is found that the
optimum distance between adjacent points 18 is approximately eight
inches. This figure is independent of the other dimensions and is
arrived at since it ensures that even when sufficient holes have
been pierced to span the width of a complete block 12 and material
in this region has been removed there is still not sufficient space
for the entry of a tool to work further on the spacing members,
particularly in view of the need to approach them via a suitable
hole in the outer layer of drill-resisting material 1. Any spacing
appreciable less than eight inches might enable complete section to
be cut out more easily and an appreciably wider spacing might
accommodate a handhole entirely within the width of one block. For
this combination of reasons a spacing of eight inches is the
optimum value.
* * * * *