U.S. patent number 3,644,081 [Application Number 04/708,506] was granted by the patent office on 1972-02-22 for process for the treatment of polyester fiberous materials.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Asahi Kasei Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha. Invention is credited to Shogo Matsuda, Yutaka Shimodoi, Kiyoshi Takao, Hiraku Yamada.
United States Patent |
3,644,081 |
Matsuda , et al. |
February 22, 1972 |
PROCESS FOR THE TREATMENT OF POLYESTER FIBEROUS MATERIALS
Abstract
A process for improving the handling of fibrous materials made
of polyester by impregnating said fibrous materials with a solution
containing an alkaline substance and a polymeric substance soluble
or dispersible in said alkaline solution, and then treating said
fibrous materials with dry heat at a temperature higher than
120.degree. C. and lower than the melting point of the polyester
fiber.
Inventors: |
Matsuda; Shogo (Toyonaka-shi,
JA), Shimodoi; Yutaka (Suita-shi, JA),
Yamada; Hiraku (Ibaraki-shi, JA), Takao; Kiyoshi
(Ibaraki-shi, JA) |
Assignee: |
Asahi Kasei Kogyo Kabushiki
Kaisha (Osaka, JA)
|
Family
ID: |
11845819 |
Appl.
No.: |
04/708,506 |
Filed: |
February 27, 1968 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 7, 1967 [JA] |
|
|
42/13892 |
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
8/115.6;
427/389.9 |
Current CPC
Class: |
D06M
11/79 (20130101); D06M 15/333 (20130101); D06M
11/71 (20130101); D06M 11/38 (20130101); D06M
11/54 (20130101); D06M 11/53 (20130101); D06M
15/11 (20130101); D06M 15/09 (20130101); D06M
15/05 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
D06M
15/333 (20060101); D06M 15/05 (20060101); D06M
11/54 (20060101); D06M 11/79 (20060101); D06M
11/53 (20060101); D06M 15/09 (20060101); D06M
15/01 (20060101); D06M 11/71 (20060101); D06M
15/11 (20060101); D06M 11/38 (20060101); D06M
11/00 (20060101); D06M 15/21 (20060101); D06m
015/24 () |
Field of
Search: |
;8/115.5,115.6
;117/138.8 ;260/75T |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Levy; Donald
Assistant Examiner: Ives; Patricia C.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. In the process for improving the handling of a fibrous material
containing at least 65 percent aromatic polyester fibers by
hydrolysis of said polyester fiber, the improvement comprising:
a. uniformly impregnating said material with an aqueous solution
consisting essentially of an inorganic alkaline salt and a
hydrophilic colloid selected from the group consisting of natural
gum, processed starches, polyvinyl alcohol, carboxymethyl
cellulose, methyl cellulose, and ethyl cellulose, the concentration
of polymeric substance being 0.5 to 20 percent based on the total
weight of the solution; and
b. heating by a dry heat treatment the impregnated material at a
temperature higher than 120.degree. C. up to the melting point of
the polyester, said heating being conducted from about 5 to about
300 seconds.
2. A process according to claim 1 wherein the concentration of the
alkaline substance in solution is 1-80 percent by weight based on
the total weight of the solution.
3. A process according to claim 1 wherein said polyester fiber is
polyethylene terephthalate.
4. A process according to claim 1 wherein said inorganic alkaline
salt comprises a hydroxide, sulfide, sulfite, phosphate, silicate
or carbonate of an alkali metal.
5. A process according to claim 1 wherein the polyester fiber is in
the form of a filamentous yarn.
Description
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to a process for improving the handling of
polyester fibrous materials comprising polyester fibers, especially
polyester long filaments. More particularly, this invention relates
to a process for treating (with dry heat continuously and at high
speed) polyester fibers and knitted goods or woven goods of
polyester fibers impregnated with an aqueous solution containing an
alkaline substance and a polymeric substance which is soluble or
dispersible to form a hydrophilic colloid in an alkaline
solution.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PRIOR ART
Improvement of the handling of knitted goods or woven goods made of
polyester fiber by impregnating said goods with an aqueous solution
of an alkaline metal hydroxide with warming is known. When
polyester fibers, for example, polyethylene terephthalate fiber is
treated with an aqueous solution of an alkali metal hydroxide, the
outer layer of the fiber dissolves and the affected layer is
hydrolyzed into terephthalic acid and ethylene glycol. A small
amount or a considerable amount of the outer layer is hydrolyzed or
dissolved, according to the condition of the treatment. The
fineness of polyester fibers is reduced in proportion to the degree
of hydrolysis of the outer layer and the fibers constituting the
fabric move easily by application of external force. Thus,
improvement perceptible as a more silky handling is effected. While
the degree of hydrolysis is 2-4 percent by weight, the original
hard touch of the product of polyester fibers is only slightly
improved, but when the degree of hydrolysis is 10-20 percent by
weight, the product has very good silky handling.
In treating polyester fibers for the above-mentioned purpose, it
has heretofore been required to select the proper kind of alkali
and to maintain the concentration of the alkali, temperature of the
treating bath and period of treatment at proper values. However,
there is substantial difficulty in choosing the condition of
treatment, when the process is carried out on an industrial
scale.
For example, in order to reduce the weight of woven fabric of
polyethylene terephthalate fiber by 15 percent by weight, it has to
be dipped in about 5 percent by weight aqueous solution of sodium
hydroxide at 95.degree.-98.degree. C. for more than 2 hours in a
jigger. This is a very inefficient process and in addition, it is
very difficult to maintain the concentration of the alkali constant
throughout. As a result, the effect of the treatment is not
uniform. Various methods, for example, methods wherein a primary or
secondary amine is used as a catalyst of hydrolysis (Japanese Pat.
Publication Nos. 3946/1962 and 7393/1962 ) and a method wherein a
quaternary ammonium salt is added to shorten the period of
treatment (U.S. Pat. No. 3,135,577) in treating polyesters
containing an aromatic dicarboxylic acid have been proposed in
order to overcome the above-mentioned difficulties.
However, these methods are not satisfactory since they attach too
much importance either to the uniformity of the treatment at the
sacrifice of the efficiency or to the efficiency of the process at
the sacrifice of the uniformity. Furthermore, the equipment used
heretofore for such treatment, for example, equipment for
processing textile such as a jigger have a drawback in that they
structurally are not suitable for continuous alkali treatment.
DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides a process for treating polyester
fibrous materials, e.g., polyester filament, fiber, thread, strand,
tow, silver, and knitted or woven goods made of polyester fibers,
especially of polyester long filaments, and the like (hereinafter
fibrous material for short) with dry heat at an elevated
temperature after application of a liquid mixture of a highly
concentrated solution of an alkali and a solution of a hydrophilic
polymeric substance which is soluble or dispersible in the alkaline
solution and can form a hydrophilic colloid.
According to this invention, the fibrous materials can be treated
continuously and at high speed and at the same time, uniformly
yielding the product having improved handling. Furthermore, the
treatment can be accomplished in a very short time.
In practice of this invention, said fibrous materials (e.g.,
knitted or woven goods) composed of polyester fibers or containing
at least 65 percent by weight of polyester fibers and less than 35
percent by weight of other filamentary materials are impregnated
uniformly with a mixture of a solution of an alkaline substance and
a hydrophilic polymeric substance (hereinafter referred to as
substance A) which gives proper viscosity to the solution of the
alkaline substance and which can at the same time form a
hydrophilic colloid in the alkali solution (hereinafter this
substance is referred to as substance A), treated with dry heat for
a short time, for example 5-300 sec., at a temperature higher than
120.degree. C. and lower than the melting point of the polyester
fiber to solubilize the surface of the fiber and then washed with
water to remove the solubilized matter. Thus, the fibrous materials
e.g., knitted or woven goods of polyester fibers may be processed
continuously into a product which is soft to the touch, and in
addition, the effect of the treatment is uniform.
Typical alkaline substances for use in the practice of this
invention include alkali metal hydroxides and other alkaline salts
such as alkali metal sulfides, alkali metal sulfites, alkali metal
phosphates, alkali metal silicates and alkali metal carbonates. An
alkaline solution is prepared by dissolving at least one such
alkaline salt. Suitable concentrations of the alkaline solution
differ with the fineness of the fiber or filament to be treated,
thickness of the cloth, degree of the softness of the cloth
desired, concentration of the substance A used therein, properties
of the solvents for the alkaline substance and substance A,
temperature of the treatment etc., and it is generally 1-80 percent
by weight preferably 5-60 percent by weight, based on the total
amount of the solution of the alkaline substance and the substance
A.
The essential aspect of the process of the present invention is
that a solution of substance A is used together with a solution of
an alkaline substance, as mentioned above.
The substance A includes natural gums, for example, tragacanth gum,
gum arabic, karaya gum, fine gum, kipro gum, and nafka crystal gum
processed starches, for example, dextrin, corn starch, crystal gum,
British gum and synthetic sizes, for example, polyvinyl alcohol,
carboxymethyl cellulose, methyl cellulose and ethyl cellulose.
These substances may be used singly or in combination. These
substances can form a highly viscous colloidal solution in an
aqueous solution.
Suitable concentration of the solution of the above-mentioned
substance A differs greatly with the concentration of the alkali
solution used, degree of softness of the cloth desired, temperature
of treatment, period of treatment and the kind of equipment used
for heat treatment. For example, in the case of gum arabic, the use
of 3-20 percent by weight is preferable, when the concentration of
the alkali solution is 5-40 percent by weight, based on the amount
of the whole solution.
As the solvent for the above-mentioned alkali substance and
substance A, a solution of at least one heterocyclic organic
nitrogen-containing compound such as pyridine or heterocyclic
oxygen-containing compounds such as dioxane containing more than 50
percent by weight of water may be used. The use of water is
preferable from the economic point of view.
The polyester fibrous materials impregnated with the
above-mentioned alkaline solution is generally subjected to heat
treatment at a temperature higher than 120.degree. C. and lower
than the melting point of said polyester fibrous materials. As the
equipment for use in the process, any equipment which presents
continuous dry heat treatment may be used, such as a metal cylinder
dryer, metal cylinder covered with an endless belt, pin tenter,
clip tenter, nontouch dryer, short loop dryer, hot flue etc. The
time required for heating is generally 5-300 seconds.
In this invention, the substance A is added to the alkaline
solution in order to repress vaporization of water from the knitted
or woven goods containing the alkaline solution at the time of dry
heat treatment and as a result, to promote hydrolysis
advantageously. The substance A itself does not catalytically
promote the hydrolysis.
Accordingly, the process of this invention exhibits its
characteristic aspect at the time of dry heat treatment at an
elevated temperature, especially at the time of dry heat treatment
at an elevated temperature higher than the boiling point of the
solvent dissolving the alkaline substance and the substance A.
This invention is further illustrated by the following examples,
although it will be understood that these examples are included
merely for purposes of illustration and are not intended to limit
the scope of the invention.
EXAMPLE 1
20 g. of 2/1 -twill fabric composed of 75-denier filament of
polyethylene terephthalate (semidull) was desized, scoured, dried,
dipped in one liter of an aqueous solution containing 430 g. of
sodium hydroxide and 80 g. of gum arabic and then squeezed with a
mangle to a squeeze rate of 40 percent. The cloth was then treated
with dry heat for 70 seconds in a clip tenter, the temperature of
which was maintained at 180.degree. C. After this dry heat
treatment, the cloth was washed in running water for one minute, in
5 percent aqueous solution of acetic acid for 2 minutes and again
in running water for 2minutes, squeezed with a mangle and dried for
30 minutes in an air bath at 100.degree. C. After standing for 24
hours and a day at 20.degree. C. and at a relative humidity of 65
percent, the cloth had a constant weight 21 percent less than the
weight before the treatment and had a very good silky touch.
On the other hand, when the same cloth was treated in the same
manner except that gum arabic was added to the aqueous solution of
the alkaline substance, the decrease of weight of the cloth after
the treatment was 9 percent.
EXAMPLE 2
Plain fabrics of warp and woof densities of 110/inch composed of
75-denier filament of polyethylene terephthalate (semidull) were
desized, scoured, dried, dipped in an aqueous solution containing
240 g. of sodium hydroxide, 50 g. of gum arabic, and 30 g. of
carboxymethyl cellulose in one liter of solution and then squeezed
with a mangle to a squeeze rate of 50 percent. The cloth was then
treated with dry heat for 85 seconds in a pin tenter, the
temperature of which was maintained at 200.degree. C. The cloth was
washed and subjected to aftertreatment in the same manner as in
Example 1. Decrease of the weight of the fabric produced by the
treatment was 25 percent and the produced polyester cloth had a
very soft and silky handling.
On the other hand, when the same cloth was treated in the same
manner except that an aqueous solution containing only 240 g. of
sodium hydroxide and no gum arabic and no carboxymethyl cellulose
in one liter was used, the decrease of the weight of the cloth was
4 percent.
EXAMPLE 3
In one liter of a 1:1 liquid mixture of a 50 percent aqueous
pyridine solution containing 600 g. of potassium hydroxide per
liter and an aqueous solution containing 40 g. of crystal gum per
liter, 30 g. of the same cloth as used in Example 1 was dipped,
squeezed to a squeeze rate of 50 percent in the same manner as in
Example 1 and then treated at 180.degree. C. in the same manner as
in Example 1. The decrease of the weight of the thus produced cloth
was 25 percent.
When the cloth was treated by the use of a liquid mixture prepared
by mixing only water instead of an aqueous solution of crystal gum
with the solution of potassium hydroxide, the decrease of the
weight of the cloth by the treatment was 12 percent.
EXAMPLE 4
In a 2:1 mixture of a solution of 20 percent by weight of sodium
hydroxide in 10 percent aqueous dioxane and an aqueous solution
containing 5 percent by weight of methyl cellulose and 3 percent by
weight of British gum, the same cloth as used in Example 2 was
dipped. It was then squeezed to a squeeze rate of 55 percent,
treated with dry heat for 60 seconds on the surface of a metal
cylinder dryer the temperature of which was maintained at
130.degree. C., and aftertreated and dried in the same manner as in
Example 1. Decrease of the weight of the cloth after this treatment
was 23 percent.
When the same cloth was treated with a solution prepared by
diluting a solution of 20 percent by weight of sodium hydroxide in
10 percent aqueous dioxane with the same amount of water, decrease
of the weight of the cloth was 13 percent.
EXAMPLE 5
The same polyester fabrics as were used in Example 2 were dipped in
one liter of aqueous solution containing 300 g. of caustic soda, 50
g. of sodium carbonate and 10 g. of fine gum and then squeezed with
a mangle to a squeeze rate of 50 percent. The cloth was then
treated with dry heat for 45 seconds at 160.degree. C. in a
nontouch dryer. The cloth was washed in water, neutralized, washed
in water and dried in the same manner as in Example 1.
The decrease of the weight of the cloth was 15 percent and the
produced cloth had a desirable, silky handling.
On the other hand, when the cloth was treated in the same manner
except that fine gum was not used, the decrease of the weight of
the cloth was only 6 percent.
EXAMPLE 6
A tricot cloth composed of 50 denier/24 filaments of polyethylene
terephthalate (full dull) was dipped in one liter of aqueous
solution containing 350 g. of caustic soda, 20 g. of sodium
silicate and 10 g. of Kipro-gum and then squeezed with a mangle to
a squeeze rate of 50 percent. The cloth was then treated with dry
heat for 200 seconds at 125.degree. C. in a short loop dryer. The
cloth was, thereafter, washed in water, neutralized, washed in
water and dried in the same manner as in Example 1.
The decrease of the weight of the tricot cloth produced by the
treatment was 17 percent and the produced cloth had a soft and
silky handling compared with that before the treatment.
On the other hand, when the cloth was treated in the same manner
except that Kipro-gum was not used, the decrease of the weight of
the tricot cloth was only 6 percent.
EXAMPLE 7
The same polyester tricot cloth as was used in Example 6 was dipped
in one liter of aqueous solution containing 320 g. of caustic soda,
30 g. of potassium phosphate and 20 g. of Nafka Crystal Gum and
then squeezed with a mangle to a squeeze rate of 50 percent.
The tricot was then subjected to a treatment for 30 seconds in a
metal drum covered with an endless belt and having the surface
temperature regulated at 140.degree. C.
The cloth was washed in water, neutralized, washed in water, and
dried in the same manner as in Example 1.
The decrease of the weight of the tricot cloth was 18 percent. The
tricot cloth thus produced had a very soft and silky handling
compared with the original cloth.
On the other hand, when the tricot cloth was treated in the same
manner except that Nafka Crystal Gum was not used, the decrease of
the weight of the tricot cloth was 9 percent.
EXAMPLE 8
The same polyester tricot cloth as was used in Example 6 was dipped
in one liter of aqueous solution containing 400g. of caustic soda,
50 g. of potassium sulfate and 25 g. of gum tragacanth and then
squeezed with a mangle to a squeeze rate of 50 percent.
The tricot cloth was then made to contact with the surface of a
metal cylinder dryer normally used for drying fabrics to be given a
dry heat treatment for 70 seconds at 130.degree. C. Then the cloth
was washed in water, neutralized, washed in water and dried in the
same manner as in Example 1.
The decrease of the weight of the tricot cloth was 24 percent and
the thus produced cloth had a very soft and silky handling,
compared with that of the original cloth.
On the other hand, when the cloth was treated in the same manner
except that gum tragacanth was not used, the decrease of the weight
of the tricot cloth was 6 percent.
EXAMPLE 9
The same polyester fabrics as were used in Example 2 were dipped in
one liter of an aqueous solution containing 310 g. of caustic
potash and 50 g. of sodium sulfate and 20 g. of Karaya gum and
squeezed with a mangle to a squeeze rate of 50 percent. The cloth
was then subjected to a dry heat treatment for 40 seconds at
180.degree. C. in a hot flue. The cloth was, thereafter, washed in
water, neutralized, washed in water and dried in the same manner as
in Example 1.
The decrease of the weight of the cloth was 19 percent and the thus
produced cloth had a very soft and silky handling, compared with
that before the treatment.
On the other hand, when the fabrics were treated in the same manner
except that Karaya gum was not used, the decrease of the weigh of
the fabrics was 4 percent.
* * * * *