U.S. patent number 3,639,245 [Application Number 04/746,691] was granted by the patent office on 1972-02-01 for developer power of thermoplastic special particles having conductive particles radially dispersed therein.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company. Invention is credited to Robert B. Nelson.
United States Patent |
3,639,245 |
Nelson |
February 1, 1972 |
**Please see images for:
( Certificate of Correction ) ** |
DEVELOPER POWER OF THERMOPLASTIC SPECIAL PARTICLES HAVING
CONDUCTIVE PARTICLES RADIALLY DISPERSED THEREIN
Abstract
Flowable, heat fusible, dry powder suitable for use as a
developer powder in electrographic recording which comprises
thermoplastic, essentially spherical particles, the thermoplastic
material of which has a conductivity of at most 10.sup..sup.-12
mho/cm., in which are essentially completely embedded electrically
conductive particles forming a radially disposed zone, said
essentially spherical particles having: A. an electronic
conductivity ranging monatonically without decreasing from between
about 10.sup..sup.-11 and 10.sup..sup.-4 mho/cm. in a 100 v./cm. DC
electrical field to between about 10.sup..sup.-8 and 10.sup..sup.-3
mho/cm. in a 10,000 v./cm. DC electrical field, B. a number average
particle diameter below 15 microns, and C. a volume ratio of said
electrically conductive particles to said total particle volume of
between 0.01/100 and 4/100.
Inventors: |
Nelson; Robert B. (Lake Elmo,
MN) |
Assignee: |
Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing
Company (Saint Paul, MN)
|
Family
ID: |
25001922 |
Appl.
No.: |
04/746,691 |
Filed: |
July 22, 1968 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
430/108.1;
430/111.4; 252/62.53; 252/62.54; 430/903 |
Current CPC
Class: |
G03G
9/0827 (20130101); G03G 9/0825 (20130101); G03G
9/0823 (20130101); G03G 9/0808 (20130101); G03G
9/0819 (20130101); Y10S 430/104 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
G03G
9/08 (20060101); G03g 009/02 () |
Field of
Search: |
;252/62.1,62.53,62.54 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Lesmes; George F.
Assistant Examiner: Brammer; J. P.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. Flowable, heat fusible, dry powder suitable for use as a
developer powder in electrographic recording which comprises
thermoplastic, essentially spherical particles, the thermoplastic
material of which has a conductivity of at most 10.sup.-.sup.12
mho/cm., in which are essentially completely embedded electrically
conductive particles having a conductivity of at least
10.sup.-.sup.2 mho/cm. and an average diameter below about 100
millimicrons forming a radially disposed zone, said essentially
spherical particles having:
a. an electronic conductivity ranging monatonically without
decreasing from between about 10.sup.-.sup.11 and 10.sup.-.sup.4
mho/cm. in a 100 v./cm. DC electrical field to between about
10.sup.-.sup.8 and 10.sup.-.sup.3 mho/cm. in a 10,000 v./cm. DC
electrical field,
b. a number average particle diameter below 15 microns, and
c. a volume ratio of said electrically conductive particles to said
total particle volume of between 0.01/100 and 4/100.
2. The dry powder of claim 1 in which said essentially spherical
particles contain therein magnetizable particles.
3. The dry powder of claim 1 in which said electrically conductive
particles are particles of highly conductive carbon having a
conductivity of at least 10.sup.-.sup.2 mho/cm.
4. The dry powder of claim 1 in which the particle size range of
said spherical particles is such that at least about 95 number
percent of the particles have a diameter greater than about 2
microns and no more than 5 number percent have a diameter greater
than 13 microns.
5. The dry powder of claim 1 in which said spherical particles have
a flowability angle of repose between 80.degree. and 125.degree.
.
6. The dry powder of claim 1 in which said spherical particles have
an electronic conductivity ranging monatonically without decreasing
from between 10.sup.-.sup.9 and 10.sup.-.sup.5 mho/cm. in a 100
v./cm. DC electrical field to between 10.sup.-.sup.7 and
10.sup.-.sup.4 mho/cm. in a 10,000 v./cm. DC electrical field.
7. The dry powder of claim 1 in which said thermoplastic material
is an organic resin.
8. The dry powder of claim 1 which is heat fusible in the range of
from about 80.degree. to 115.degree. C.
Description
This invention relates to a dry ink powder suitable for use in
electrographic recording and a process for making such powder. In
one aspect this invention relates to a developer powder having a
good electrical conductivity in the presence of a relatively large
impressed electric field, and low electrical conductivity (and
hence good charge retention characteristics for the charge
remaining on it) in the absence of this high impressed field. In
still another aspect this invention relates to dry developer
particles for electrophotography which are magnetizable. In still
another aspect, this invention relates to a developer powder which
has a pressure dependent conductivity, being more conductive under
the influence of an impressed magnetic field during development,
and less conductive (and hence having better individual charge
retention characteristics) in the absence of this impressed
magnetic field.
Electrostatic electrophotography originally employed two component
dry ink powders, often called "triboelectric mixtures," for charge
development of the electrostatic image. Recently dry powders in
which all of the particles are of the same composition have been
described. The relatively conductive dry inks of U.S. Pat. No.
3,116,510 (Jan. 19, 1965 ; Charles P. West and Jacques Benveniste)
contain thermoplastic resin particles in which about 35 to 55
percent of the total particle weight is carbon black dispersed
throughout the resin particles. In U.S. Pat. No. 3,196,032 (July
20, 1965 ; David W. Seymour) an electrostatic printing ink having
carbon powder partially embedded in or adhered to the surface of
resin particles is prepared in a fluid bed reactor.
In a new electrographic process, described in French Pat. No.
1,456,993, an exposed photoconductive sheet is contacted with
conductive developer powder applied from a conductive surface, to
which it is adhered, while creating a differential electrical field
between the photoconductive sheet (i.e., field electrode) and the
conductive surface containing the developer powder. The developer
powder is transferred selectively to the photoconductive sheet in
the nonexposed areas. Separation of the photoconductive sheet from
the source of supply of developer powder is made while still
maintaining the influence of the electrical field, and provision
can be made for continuing the attraction of the developer powder
to the surface of the photoconductive sheet after such separation.
The developer powder in this process is electronically conductive,
usually having a conductivity of at least 10.sup.-.sup.10 mho per
centimeter (ohm.sup.-.sup.1 cm..sup.-.sup.1 ), preferably
10.sup.-.sup.2 to 10.sup.-.sup.7 mho per centimeter, at the applied
electrical field (preferably at least 1,000 DC volts per
centimeter). Conductivity measurements are made with the developer
powder compressed into a 1 -centimeter cube between brass
electrodes fitted in a rigid chamber, a pressure of 86 pounds per
square inch (6.05 kg. per cm..sup.2) being applied across the
sample before and during the measurement of conductance. If the
developer powder is subsequently to be transferred from the
photoconductive sheet to a receptor surface, it should also have
electrical charge retention capability, to retain the electrical
charge imparted to the developer particles by the applied
electrical field during the development of the pattern on the field
electrode. This may be accomplished by providing the developer
particles with a highly resistive interior or core and a highly
conductive surface or shell. However, the high conductivity of the
developer particles desired to minimize voltage drop across them
when they are in the electrical field, and the ability of the
developer particles to retain the electrical charge, which
characterizes high resistivity particles, are difficult to achieve
satisfactorily, since one desirable characteristic is generally
sacrificed to obtain the other.
It is therefore an object of this invention to provide new
particles suitable for use as electrographic developers,
particularly in the process of French Pat. No. 1,456,993, also
referred to as the "Electropowder process." Still another object of
this invention is to provide powder particles having both high
conductivity and good electrical charge retention. Yet another
object is to provide a process for the manufacture of such
developer particles.
The FIGURE is a plot of electrical conductivity vs. DC applied
electrical field for developer particles of this invention.
The developer powders of this invention comprise thermoplastic,
essentially spherical particles (i.e., spherules), the
thermoplastic material of which has a conductivity of at most
10.sup.-.sup.12 mho/cm., preferably at most 10.sup.-.sup.13
mho/cm., in which are essentially completely embedded electrically
conductive particles forming a radially disposed layer or "zone,"
said essentially spherical particles having an electronic
conductivity which ranges monatonically without decreasing from
between about 10.sup.-.sup.11 and about 10.sup.-.sup.4 mho/cm.
(preferably between 10.sup.-.sup.9 and 10.sup.-.sup.5 mho/cm.) in a
100 v./cm. DC electrical field to between 10.sup.-.sup.8 and about
10.sup.-.sup.3 mho/cm. (preferably between 10.sup.-.sup.7 and
10.sup.-.sup.4 mho/cm.) in a 10,000 v./cm. DC electrical field, and
having a number average diameter below 15, preferably below 10,
microns. Preferably, the average particle size range is such that
at least about 95 number percent of the particles have a diameter
greater than about 2 microns, while no more than 5 number percent
have a diameter greater than about 15 microns. These dry ink
powders are flowable to such an extent that they have a flowability
angle of repose ranging from about 80.degree. to 125.degree. and
preferably from 110.degree. to 125.degree.. For purposes of this
invention, flowability is measured by feeding a thin stream of
powder to the upper flat surface of a 3-inch diameter circular
pedestal from a vibrating funnel, thereby creating a conical
deposit of powder on the pedestal. The angle of repose is defined
by the angle measured between opposite sides of the conical
deposit, i.e., the apex angle of the cone, at 25.degree. C.
The dry ink powders of this invention and the thermoplastic
materials used therein are preferably heat fusible in the range of
80.degree. to 115.degree. C., preferably from 90.degree. to
105.degree. C. For determining fusion temperatures the Durrans'
Mercury method, as reported in SMS 114, is employed. Any heat
fusible thermoplastic material having a conductivity of at most
10.sup.-.sup.12 mho/cm. may be used to form the spherules, although
thermoplastic organic polymers are preferred. Examples of suitable
resins include B-stage (i.e., partially cured) phenol aldehyde
polymers, polyvinyl acetate, epoxy resins, etc.
In general, any highly electrically conductive material (i.e., a
material having a conductivity of at least 10.sup.-.sup.2 mho/cm.,
such as conductive carbon, metal, etc.) may be used in powdered
form as the electrically conductive particles forming the
conductive zone of the dry ink particles, provided the resulting
electrically conductive particles have an average diameter below
100 millimicrons, preferably under 40 millimicrons. Conductive
carbon particles (e.g., those available under the trade name Vulcan
XC-72 R, sold by Cabot Corporation) are preferred.
It has been found that the amount of conductive material in the
embedded zone of the dry ink particle, the type of conductive
material used, the particle size of the embedded conductive
particles, and the location of the embedded zone can influence the
conductivity of the dry ink powder. Generally the volume ratio of
electrically conductive material to the total particle volume in
the ink powder can be in the range of 0.01/100 to 4.0/100, although
0.1/100 to 1.5/100 is preferred. The embedded zone of conductive
particles is normally quite close to the surface of the ink
particle and is preferably not thicker than one-tenth the radius of
the essentially spherical developer particle. Although essentially
all of the conductive particles are embedded, an occasional
particle may protrude from the surface. The conductivity of these
developer particles is "field dependent," i.e., the conductivity
under high electrical fields differs from the conductivity under
low electrical fields. In fact, as mentioned earlier, the
electrical conductivity of the developer particles is a
monatonically, nondecreasing function of the applied DC electrical
field. It is preferred that the slope of the conductivity vs.
applied electrical field curve also increases monatonically with
the applied electrical field. This has been found to be extremely
valuable for developer powders used in the process of French Pat.
No. 1,456,993, since the developer particles display high
conductivity under the high electrical field conditions of particle
deposition on the field electrode and display lower conductivity
(and hence better electrical charge retention) after they are
removed from the high electrical field. As mentioned earlier,
charge retention is particularly important when one desires to
transfer the imagewise pattern of developer particles from the
field electrode to a receptor sheet without loss of particles.
Although the mechanism is not completely understood, the field
dependent conductivity of these particles is believed to be
attributable to their being essentially completely immersed or
embedded in the relatively insulative, thermoplastic material. At
the higher electrical fields the electrical current is believed to
"tunnel" or pass through the thermoplastic material on the particle
surface to reach the embedded zone or layer of conductive material.
At the lower electrical fields the thermoplastic surface layer
serves as an effective insulative barrier to current flow,
resulting in a lower particle conductivity and a higher electrical
charge retention capability.
Various other materials may be usefully incorporated in or on the
developer particles of this invention, e.g., plasticizers,
dyestuffs, pigments, magnetically permeable particles, etc.
Magnetically permeable particles having an average diameter of 1
micron or less are particularly preferred, including magnetite,
barium ferrite, nickel zinc ferrite, chromium oxide, nickel oxide,
etc. A magnetically permeable core may also be used. Powdered flow
agents may also be added to the dry particles to improve their flow
characteristics.
The conductivity of these dry ink powders is related to the applied
electric field across the powder particles, and measurement of
conductivity is therefore made under standard conditions of sample
size, sample compression and applied electric field. The following
test procedure is used for the conductivity measurements presented
herein.
The sample of ink is placed in a test cell between two brass
electrodes of circular cross section, each with a cross-sectional
area of about 0.073 cm..sup.2. An insulating cylindrical sleeve of
polytetrafluoroethylene surrounds the ink and electrodes such that
the ink sample is constrained to the shape of a small pill box. At
least one of the electrodes is free to move like a piston in the
insulating sleeve to provide a predetermined compression on the
sample. The compression is obtained by placing a known weight on
the movable electrode, and typically one uses a 100 gram weight to
give a pressure of 1,370 g./cm..sup.2 on the sample. One places
enough ink into the cell such that the final electrode spacing
under the above pressure is about 0.05 cm. to about 0.1 cm., and
preferably as close to 0.05 cm. as possible. The final spacing is
measured carefully using a cathetometer. A voltage is applied in a
series circuit arrangement consisting of the ink sample, an
electrical current meter (such as a Keithley Model 601
Electrometer), and the voltage source. The ink conductivity is
calculated from the voltage which appears across the sample
electrodes and the current which flows through it in the usual
manner. The voltage is varied and the resulting conductivity is
calculated for various electric fields from about 10 v./cm. to
about 1,000 to 4,000 v./cm. For fields higher than about 4,000
v./cm., the voltage cannot be applied to the sample for longer than
a fraction of a second or so, before considerable heat develops in
the sample, changing its characteristics, or causing it to "break
down" entirely. To measure the electrical conductivity at high
fields, therefore, the applied voltage is rapidly increased from
about 0 to 2,000 v. or more (corresponding to fields of about 0
v./cm. to about 40,000 v./cm.) in about 10 milliseconds, and is
then immediately returned to about 0 v. again before appreciable
heating or breakdown occurs in the sample. This voltage "sweep" is
accomplished by using a special, high voltage ramp (or sweep)
generator. To measure the current through the sample, when using
the voltage sweep, the current meter described earlier is replaced
by a current-sampling resistor, typically of about 10,000 ohms. The
voltage across this sampling resistor, as monitored by an
oscilloscope, is proportional to the current flowing through the
sample. The voltage across the sample is also monitored on an
oscilloscope, using high voltage probes. Typically, the voltage
across the current-sampling resistor is applied to the horizontal
input to the oscilloscope, while the voltage across the ink sample
itself is applied to the vertical input to the same oscilloscope,
giving a direct plot proportional to the current (abscissa) vs.
voltage (ordinate) characteristics of the ink sample on the
oscilloscope screen, which is then photographed. From this, the
conductivity vs. field characteristics of the ink sample at very
high fields can be calculated. The electrical conductivity data
given in Table I was obtained in the above manner. ##SPC1##
The dry ink powder conductivity should be such that at high applied
electric fields, it permits a relatively large current flow from
the development electrode to the intermediate photoconductive
imageable surface during the development step, which is carried out
with a relatively large series voltage impressed. However, the
powder should not be so conductive that after one layer is
deposited on the intermediate photoconductive imageable surface it
thereafter electrically "shields" subsequent layers of powder from
the intermediate surface, accepting their charge but preventing
their deposition as would happen with a highly conductive powder.
Additionally, at low or zero applied electric field, the
conductivity should be considerably smaller so the powder which was
deposited on the intermediate photoconductive imageable surface
retains its charge for a time period sufficient to permit transfer
of the powder from the intermediate surface to a receptor sheet.
After development is completed, the electric field holding the
powder to the intermediate surface in areas where it is deposited
is still relatively strong, but the nature of the interface in
these areas is insulating enough to prevent the charge to flow from
the powder into the intermediate itself. At the same time, the
lateral electric field from particle to particle is very small or
zero, so the charge on the deposited particles does not "leak"
laterally to the more conductive areas on the intermediate
surrounding the deposited powder. Furthermore, the electric field
from layer to layer of deposited powder is small after development,
so the charge does not readily leak from layers more remote from
the intermediate surface to the layers more adjacent to said
surface. Thus all deposited particles remain strongly bound to the
intermediate and retain their charge for a time.
In preparing the developer powders a dry-powdered blend of
appropriate composition is first obtained by any of several
standard means, for example, by melting a resin, stirring in the
solid filler, if any, allowing the mixture to cool, then grinding
and classifying to the appropriate particle size range of
approximately 1 to 15 microns diameter. This powder, which is
pseudocubical in shape is then "spheroidized" by the following
method: the powder is aspirated into a moving gas stream,
preferably air, thus creating an aerosol. This aerosol is directed
at about 90.degree. (.+-.5.degree.) through a stream of hot air,
which has been heated to about 900.degree.-1,100.degree. F., into a
cooling chamber, where the powder is then allowed to settle by
gravity while it cools. The resulting powder is now made up of
substantially spherical particles. It is then dry blended with
conductive powder, such as conductive carbon black, and the mixture
is directed at about 90.degree. (.+-.5.degree.) through a stream of
gas, preferably air, heated to a temperature (e.g.,
700.degree.-800.degree. F.) which can at least soften and desirably
melt the thermoplastic resin in the particles and maintain that
softened or melted condition for a period of time sufficient to
permit the conductive powder to become essentially completely
embedded, due to the effects of surface tension. The particles are
then collected, such as by cyclone separation, and are preferably
blended with a flow agent, such as "CAB-O-SIL" (finely divided
silica, a trademarked product of Cabot Corporation) to insure that
it will be free flowing.
In an alternative preparation of the developer powders of this
invention the conductive material may be deposited, as a powder or
as a continuous film, on the surface of the essentially spherical
particles, and a thin film of insulative material, e.g., a resin,
may be superimposed or deposited thereon to effectively embed the
conductive material as a zone in the particles.
The following procedure represents a preferred method for
manufacturing the dry ink powder.
EXAMPLE A
Four parts by weight of "Epon 1004" (epichlorohydrin/bisphenol A
solid epoxy resin, melting point 95.degree.-105.degree. C., epoxide
equivalent of 875-1,025, molecular weight of 1,400, a trademarked
product of Shell Chemical Company) and 6 parts by weight of
magnetite were blended thoroughly on a conventional heated-roll
rubber mill. The resulting material was pulverized in an
attrition-type grinder and was then classified in a standard
air-centrifugal-type machine, the yield from which was about 20
percent by weight in the desired particle size distribution range.
Particle size analysis of the product showed it to be about 95%>
1.3.mu., 50%> 4.1.mu., 5%> 12.6.mu. (by number).
These particles, which are sharp edged and pseudocubical in shape,
were then "spheroidized" such that most of the particles were
transformed into spherelike shapes or round-edged particles by the
following process. The powder was fed to an air aspirator in a
uniform stream of about 800 grams per hour. The aspirator sucks the
particles into the airstream and disperses them, forming an
aerosol. This aerosol was directed at 90.degree. into a heated
airstream, the temperature of which was about
950.degree.-1,000.degree. F. The powder was then allowed to settle
and was collected by filtration.
At this point the majority of the particles had been transformed
into spherelike shapes and were ready for the next step in the
process which was to mix the powder with the appropriate quantity
of conductive carbon black which in this case was 1.33 parts
conductive carbon black, approximate diameter 30 millimicrons, per
100 parts powder by weight. After the two components were
thoroughly mixed, the carbon was embedded into the resin by the
spheroidization process, exactly as it was described above, except
that the temperature of the hot airstream was adjusted to about
740.degree. F. and the product was collected in a cyclone-type
separator.
The final step in the process was to blend 0.1 percent by weight of
a small particle size SiO.sub.2 flow agent to cause the powder to
become sufficiently free flowing for use in the electropowder
process. This ink was coded A, and the conductivity vs. applied
electrical field curve is shown in the FIGURE.
Table I shows the properties obtained when several other
formulations (B-F) were prepared by the method given in the above
example, and the conductivity vs. applied electrical field curves
are presented in the FIGURE. The two dotted lines in the FIGURE
represented the upper and lower limits of conductivity over the
range of applied DC electrical fields, as mentioned earlier.
* * * * *