U.S. patent number 3,628,347 [Application Number 05/027,928] was granted by the patent office on 1971-12-21 for refrigerating vapor bath.
Invention is credited to Donald G. McCoy, Lawrence J. Puckett, Marion Warfield Teague.
United States Patent |
3,628,347 |
Puckett , et al. |
December 21, 1971 |
REFRIGERATING VAPOR BATH
Abstract
In the laboratory, or for other limited refrigeration purposes,
the cooling effect of a liquid refrigerant may be used for a
limited period of time without recompressing and reliquifying the
refrigerant. The present disclosure teaches how to accomplish this
feat with maximum efficiency by placing the specimen to be cooled
in proximity to the liquid, thereby permitting heat transfer
directly to the gaseous refrigerant which is vaporizing from the
liquid. Further, the rate of cooling is variable, in accordance
with the need for cooling, by warming the liquid to vaporize more
liquid, thereby increasing the vapor density above the liquid. With
greater vapor density (or, we might say, by making the fog thicker)
the heat exchange rate (cooling rate) is increased. Conversely,
when heat is not supplied to the liquid, and the vapor density is
decreased, the rate of heat exchange (cooling rate) is decreased.
The rate of cooling, and the minimum temperature obtainable, may be
varied further by adjustable pressure relief means to control the
"boiling" point of the refrigerant. Vacuum may be applied to the
container if desired to lower the boiling point even lower to
achieve a lower temperature.
Inventors: |
Puckett; Lawrence J.
(Churchville, MD), Teague; Marion Warfield (Aberdeen,
MD), McCoy; Donald G. (Baltimore, MD) |
Assignee: |
|
Family
ID: |
21840575 |
Appl.
No.: |
05/027,928 |
Filed: |
April 13, 1970 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
62/208; 62/48.1;
62/56; 62/100; 62/216; 62/217; 62/268; 62/399 |
Current CPC
Class: |
F25D
29/001 (20130101); F25D 3/10 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
F25D
3/10 (20060101); F25D 29/00 (20060101); F25b
041/00 () |
Field of
Search: |
;62/52,53,50,51,216,217,169,268,100,208 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Wye; William J.
Claims
We claim:
1. Apparatus for refrigerating an item comprising a container in
which the item is to be placed, liquid and gas refrigerant in said
container in close proximity to each other, means to produce
heating of the liquid to increase the vapor density adjacent to the
liquid and surrounding the item to be cooled to thereby increase
the rate of cooling, means automatically responsive to an increase
in the temperature of the item being cooled to increase the
temperature of the heat-producing means to thereby increase the
cooling rate, pressure release means to limit pressure buildup in
said container, said pressure release means being adjustable
whereby the pressure and boiling point of the liquid may be raised
to thereby raise the vapor density and increase the cooling rate
while conserving cooling liquid and vapor, and said pressure
release means being completely closable to stop all loss of vapor
and liquid from said container.
Description
The invention described herein may be manufactured, used, licensed
by or for the Government for governmental purposes without the
payment to us of any royalty thereon.
BRIEF SUMMARY
The state-of-the-art method of achieving low stabilized
temperatures [below 0.degree. C (32.degree. F.)] in the laboratory
has not been significantly advanced in many years. The most
practical means available of obtaining known temperatures below
0.degree. C. was to make a slurry of some appropriate chemical with
a cooling agent, e.g., dry ice or liquid nitrogen. The cooling
agent served to lower the temperature of the chemical to its
melting-freezing point, at which temperature it would remain over a
wide range of heat transfers.
There are several disadvantages associated with that procedure.
First, one must maintain the proper amount of cooling agent in the
chemical; if too much is used, all the chemical will freeze, thus
lowering the temperature below the transition point; if the cooling
agent is not replenished frequently (typically at 1-hour
intervals), the chemical will warm above its melting-freezing point
and the temperature will increase. Therefore it can become very
tedious and time-consuming to maintain a given temperature in a
slurry. A second disadvantage is that the temperatures (below
0.degree. C.) are limited to the precise melting points of the
available chemicals. Further disadvantages associated with chemical
slurries involve fire hazards and toxic vapors.
A technique has been developed recently that is superior in some
respects to the one previously described. The sample is cooled by
cold-flowing vapor from nitrogen or other refrigerant and the vapor
is passed to the sample location through a transfer line.
The advantage in this technique is that the sample temperature can
be continuously varied by regulating the flow rate of the cold
refrigerant vapor. There are, however, two major disadvantages to
this procedure. The first is that even with well-insulated transfer
lines a considerable amount of heat loss occurs between the cold
nitrogen vapor and the walls of the transfer line. Thus, a large
flow rate must be used in order to achieve the required amount of
cooling at the sample location. The second disadvantage is also
associated with the consumption rate of liquid nitrogen. Due to the
heat transfer to the flowing vapor from its environment the vapor
is warmed above its vaporization temperature and in this state it
is not practical to store the vapor. Therefore one has two options
available. The warmed nitrogen vapor may be exhausted from the
cooling system, with the requirement that additional nitrogen must
be added to replace that which was lost. Or, a refrigeration plant
may be employed to cool or compress and cool the warmed vapor to
the liquid form so that it can be returned to the liquid nitrogen
reservoir. The first choice is not desirable because it leads to a
very large consumption rate of liquid nitrogen. For example, on a
simple system it was found that about 1.5 liters per hour of liquid
nitrogen were required to maintain a sample temperature of
-160.degree. C. The alternative is impractical in most laboratories
because of the economics associated with purchasing and operation
of an adequate (high pressure) refrigeration plant. For the above
reasons, the flowing vapor system described above is seldom
employed for cooling purposes.
The stationary vapor bath described hereinafter was devised to
reduce the consumption rate of liquid nitrogen and, hence, make the
use of vapor cooling more practical. When a comparison was made
between the consumption rate of liquid nitrogen in the present
system and that of a flowing vapor system it was found that the
present system was more than 25 times as efficient. The high
efficiency is achieved through the elimination of a vapor transfer
line and other features as will become more evident hereinafter.
Furthermore, the dangers from fire hazards and toxic vapors are
negligible in this system.
IN THE DRAWING
FIG. 1 illustrates the principles of the invention;
FIG. 2 illustrates a modification.
A charge of liquid refrigerant 1 (e.g., nitrogen or other
refrigerant) is placed in container 2 preferably surrounded by
insulation 3 and closed by a member 4. A material to be
refrigerated, a gas for example, may be passed continuously through
tubing 5, or allowed to remain for a period of time and then
removed in its refrigerated condition. Of course, bulk material,
solid articles or other items to be cooled could be placed inside
of container 2 above liquid 1.
The liquid refrigerant begins to boil or vaporize and forms a gas
or vapor 6 above the liquid. Adjustable valve 7 is provided in
passageway 8 leading from the interior of container 2 to the
atmosphere.
A heating device 9 may be provided in proximity to or directly in
the liquid refrigerant 1. The heating device may be energized by
electricity, for example, introduced through a known type of
pyrometer 10 controlled by manual switch 11 and automatic
temperature switch 12. An indicator telltale lamp 13 lets the
attendant know when the apparatus is energized. The electrical
apparatus is of a type well known to those skilled in the art. It
may be of the on-off type or of the variable supply type whereby
the rate of heat supply may be varied to obtain differing
heating-cooling rates.
OPERATION
A charge of liquid refrigerant 1 is placed in container 2 and the
closure member 4 is inserted. (If it is desired to contain high
bursting pressures the container, closure member, fittings and so
on will be appropriately designed.) If very low temperatures are to
be produced, the refrigerant may be liquid nitrogen or such with a
very low boiling point. If intermediate "cold" temperatures are
desired a refrigerant with a higher boiling point may be used,
e.g., R-12, boiling point -21.6.degree. F. at atmospheric pressure.
If the "cooling" is to be from "hot" (e.g., 212.degree. F.) to
"warm" e.g., 100.degree. F.), R-11 could be used, boiling point
74.7.degree. F.
Valve 7 may be used to bleed off air originally trapped inside and
the valve may then be set for a desired pressure buildup. After
that pressure is reached valve 7 will release gas to maintain the
preselected pressure. Or, the valve may be completely closed to
allow the pressure to rise to its maximum value for the particular
liquid gas and the ambient temperature, e.g., R-12 will rise to a
pressure of 77 lbs./sq. in. at an ambient "room" temperature of
75.degree. F. This would extinguish the cooling action and preserve
the refrigerant until further cooling is desired at which time the
pressure would be partially or completely released. Or, valve 7 may
be opened to permit the liquid to boil or vaporize at its lowest
temperature at the prevailing ambient or atmospheric pressure;
e.g., R-11 boils at atmospheric pressure (14.7 lbs./sq. in.
absolute) when at a "room" temperature of 74.7.degree. F.
The gas 6 will be at approximately the same temperature as the
boiling liquid. Therefore, almost any desired temperature of gas 6
may be obtained by selecting a refrigerant with a boiling point
lower than the temperature sought, and by permitting pressure to
escape via valve 7 to maintain that pressure on the chosen
refrigerant which corresponds with the temperature desired. If
desired, a partial vacuum may be applied to container 2 in order to
achieve an even lower temperature with a particular liquid.
SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEM
As explained above, various refrigerants may be chosen for
different sets of temperature conditions in laboratory equipment of
this type. However, the cooling rate with a given refrigerant,
under given fixed conditions of pressure, ambient temperature,
insulation and so on, was not variable under prior teachings. In
the present invention the rate of cooling is variable merely by
adding heat to the liquid; or by adjusting the pressure in the
container, or both. A faster cooling rate is obtained by adding
heat. Prior to turning on heating element 9 liquid 1 boils or
vaporizes to produce gas 6 to a point of equilibrium or a saturated
state of the gas above the liquid. Further evaporation of the
liquid is equaled by reentry of some of the gas back into the pool
of liquid. The liquid and gas are at the same temperature, that is,
the boiling temperature of the liquid for the surrounding pressure
conditions (e.g., at atmospheric pressure, approximately:
212.degree. F. for water; 117.degree. F. for R-113; 75.degree. F.
for R-11; 38.degree. F. for R-114; -22.degree. F. for R-12'
-41.degree. F. for R-22; -115.degree. F. for R-13; and -319.degree.
F. for nitrogen).
Adding heat to the liquid produces only minor warming of the liquid
and gas and a pressure buildup in the container. Therefore, the
principal effect of the additional heat is that the liquid
vaporizes faster and adds more of the relatively "cold steam" or
"fog" to the gas space. For example, at liquid nitrogen temperature
of -196.degree. C. a temperature change of approximately 3.5
percent will change the vapor pressure by 100 percent. More
specifically, in a system of fixed geometry, the rate of heat
transfer, dQ/dT, from the sample to the refrigerant is proportional
to the vapor pressure, P, of the refrigerant and the difference
between the sample temperature, T.sub.s, and the refrigerant
temperature, T.sub.R. Hence,
Thus a 3 percent increase in refrigerant temperature will increase
the lower temperature limit of the sample by the same amount, but
the rate of sample cooling at intermediate temperatures will be
increased by approximately 100 percent. Expressed in other words,
the rate of heat transfer is increased between the gas and the item
being cooled and the cooling action is accentuated despite the
slight increase in temperature of the gas.
By way of contrast, previous systems increased the rate of heat
transfer by flowing or "blowing" more of the vapor around the item
to be cooled. This required much more of the vapor and used much
more liquid to accomplish the desired cooling. The vapor in contact
with the liquid was not saturated and therefore there was not as
much reentry of the gas to the liquid as in the present system when
the vapor is saturated. In the present system much of the saturated
vapor returns to the liquid even while heat is being supplied.
In a modification, illustrated in FIG. 2, the sample 5' is placed
in the liquid refrigerant and the sample temperature is regulated
directly with the liquid refrigerant temperature which in turn is
controlled through evaporative cooling. For example, the liquid
refrigerant temperature will rise to the value characteristic of
the refrigerant at the given pressure within the container.
Therefore the liquid and the sample temperature can be controlled
by regulation of the vapor pressure thereabove by means of valve 8.
Almost any desired temperature of the sample may be obtained by
selecting a refrigerant with a boiling point lower than the
temperature sought and by regulating the rate of vapor release. It
may be noted that the heat originally contained in the sample to be
cooled causes a portion of the liquid to evaporate and the
evaporating liquid, in turn, helps cool the sample. Thus heat is
conserved in this modification thereby reducing the requirement for
heat from the heating element 9.
THE METHOD
The method of cooling embodies the following;
Pressure inside of the container is normally held above atmospheric
pressure. This keeps the vapor pressure higher and keeps the "fog"
or vapor thicker thereby increasing the rate of heat transfer or
cooling of the item being cooled. The adjustable pressure release
valve is set to determine the vapor pressure and density of the
vapor for the desired cooling rate. A higher cooling rate is
obtained as heat is added, the pressure is increased, and the vapor
becomes thicker. However, if it is necessary to obtain the lowest
possible temperatures, the pressure must be lowered to permit the
liquid to evaporate more freely at a lower temperature.
A two-step or a three-step method may be followed. First, the
pressure release valve may be set for a relatively high vapor
pressure with consequent high vapor density and rapid cooldown of
the item. Secondly, after the initial cooldown or rapid
prechilling, the pressure may be lowered toward, or to, atmospheric
pressure. This permits the liquid to boil at a lower temperature
level (say -196.degree. C. for liquid nitrogen at atmospheric
pressure) and therefore yields colder liquid and vapor. Therefore,
in either FIG. 1 or FIG. 2 the item can be cooled to a very low
temperature. If an even lower temperature is required, as a third
step, a vacuum can be applied to the container to achieve a lower
boiling point of the liquid with a lower consequent temperature of
the liquid and vapor and the item being cooled.
Thermostat or temperature sensor 12, and control 10 associated
therewith, may be adjustable to supply more heat when greater
cooling is desired, or less heat when less cooling is desired. The
net result, as pointed out hereinabove, is that the present system
is more than 25 times as efficient as a flowing vapor system
tested. Thus, the present apparatus and method of operation are
very simple, low in cost, long lived, easy to maintain and highly
efficient. The rate of cooling is controlled by very simple
apparatus which simply adds a small amount of heat as necessary to
increase vapor density above the liquid.
* * * * *