U.S. patent number 3,623,111 [Application Number 04/864,082] was granted by the patent office on 1971-11-23 for multiaperture radiating array antenna.
This patent grant is currently assigned to The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Navy. Invention is credited to Jerry E. Boyns, Brian R. Gladman, Archer D. Munger, Joseph H. Provencher.
United States Patent |
3,623,111 |
Provencher , et al. |
November 23, 1971 |
MULTIAPERTURE RADIATING ARRAY ANTENNA
Abstract
An integrated function microwave radiating structure capable of
radiating ectromagnetic energy at several selectively predetermined
different frequency bands simultaneously and which can be used as
an element of a large microwave array antenna is disclosed. The
unitary substantially rectangular structure comprises multiple,
closely spaced sets of radiating elements of various possible
configurations located and supported in a defined aperture area in
an interlaced contiguous manner with respect to each other. Each
set of radiating elements radiates over a particular frequency band
within the total band over which coverage is required. By
energizing each radiating element independently in a predetermined
phase and amplitude relationship with respect to the other
elements, the radiated composite beam (from each of the elements)
can be scanned in either the horizontal or vertical planes.
Undesired mutual interaction affects between the closely spaced
adjacent elements operating at different frequencies are minimized
by cross-polarizing techniques.
Inventors: |
Provencher; Joseph H. (San
Diego, CA), Boyns; Jerry E. (San Diego, CA), Munger;
Archer D. (San Diego, CA), Gladman; Brian R. (San Diego,
CA) |
Assignee: |
The United States of America as
represented by the Secretary of the Navy (N/A)
|
Family
ID: |
25342489 |
Appl.
No.: |
04/864,082 |
Filed: |
October 6, 1969 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
343/727; 342/368;
343/797; 343/778 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H01Q
5/42 (20150115); H01Q 13/06 (20130101); H01Q
3/34 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
H01Q
3/30 (20060101); H01Q 13/06 (20060101); H01Q
5/00 (20060101); H01Q 13/00 (20060101); H01Q
3/34 (20060101); H01q 003/26 () |
Field of
Search: |
;343/725,727,771,776,778,786,854,797 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Primary Examiner: Lieberman; Eli
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. An integrated function antenna array structure comprising:
a plurality of columns of vertically polarized, C-band rectangular
waveguides and X-band rectangular waveguides;
each of said X-band waveguides in each of said columns being
disposed and rigidly supported in a contiguous, face-to-face
stacked relationship between two of said C-band waveguides;
a plurality of columns of horizontally polarized, S-band
rectangular waveguides;
said S-band waveguides in each of said columns being disposed and
rigidly supported in a contiguous, end-to-end stacked relationship
with respect to each other;
each of said columns of C-band and X-band waveguides being disposed
and rigidly supported in a contiguous manner between two of said
columns of S-band waveguides;
whereby all of said columns of C-band, X-band and S-band
rectangular waveguides comprise a substantially rectangular,
unitary antenna structure;
and electromagnetic energy source means connected to each of said
C-band, X-band, and S-band waveguides at the closed end thereof in
an end-fed manner whereby each of said waveguides can be energized
independently of the other waveguides.
2. The antenna array structure of claim 1 further including a row
of closely spaced, vertically polarized L-band rectangular
waveguides;
said row of L-band waveguides being symmetrically disposed and
rigidly supported in a contiguous manner with respect to said
columns of C-band, X-band, and S-band waveguides.
3. A multifrequency antenna structure comprising:
a plurality of columns of rigidly supported, vertically disposed,
and horizontally polarized S-band rectangular waveguides;
a plurality of columns of crossed dipoles;
each of said columns of crossed dipoles being disposed and rigidly
supported in a contiguous manner between two of said S-band
rectangular waveguides;
a row of closely spaced, vertically polarized L-band rectangular
waveguides;
said row of L-band waveguides being symmetrically disposed and
rigidly supported in a contiguous manner with respect to said
columns of S-band waveguides and crossed dipoles;
and electromagnetic energy source means connected to each of said
S-band and L-band waveguides and crossed dipoles at the end thereof
in an end-fed manner.
4. The antenna structure of claim 3 wherein said crossed dipoles
comprise printed circuit dipoles.
Description
STATEMENT OF GOVERNMENT INTEREST
The invention described herein may be manufactured and used by or
for the Government of the United States of America for governmental
purposes without the payment of any royalties thereon or
therefor.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The continually increasing number of antennas required on Navy
ships can force a compromise between shipboard antenna performance
and the space available on the superstructure. If space is at a
premium, antenna performance may not be optimum for all functions.
One solution for improving antenna performance in limited space
environments is to integrate several microwave radiating structures
into a single configuration to provide multiband operation. Thus,
for example, the frequency range of 0.9 to 12.0 Ghz can be utilized
in a single configuration to encompass radar surveillance, ECM,
identification, navigation, and microwave satellite communications.
The specific functions which can be accommodated by a particular
antenna are ultimately determined by the configuration,
polarization, power handling capability, and other design factors
known to those skilled in the art. For example, an increasing
emphasis on adaptive and multifunction antenna which have the
capability to adapt to changes in environment, mission, and
function implies the use of rapidly scanning, highly agile,
pencil-beam or simultaneous multiple-beam antennas.
Previous attempts have been made to develop integrated antennas for
multifrequency applications. The prior art, however, has been
unable to cope with several problems which arise in such devices.
For example, the mutual interaction between closely spaced
waveguide elements operating at different frequencies may be
excessive such that system performance is seriously deteriorated.
Also, larger waveguide elements propagate many modes and as a
result, intermode coupling can result in power losses in a system.
Finally, the isolation between the transmit and receive functions
must be high for receiver protection, and the radiating elements
must be overdesigned to withstand the power at the higher operating
frequency.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
An integrated function microwave radiating structure for radiating
electromagnetic energy at several selectively predetermined
frequency bands simultaneously is disclosed. The radiating
structure comprises multiple, closely spaced, sets of radiating
elements of various possible configurations located and rigidly
supported in a defined aperture area in an interlaced contiguous
manner with respect to each other. The interlaced sets of radiating
elements are selected such that each set radiates over a particular
frequency band within the total frequency band of the structure.
Each radiating element is individually energized, and thus the
individual radiated beams can be scanned in either the horizontal
or vertical planes due to the independent control which can be
provided to each radiating element. By cross-polarizing certain
sets of elements with respect to the other sets, the mutual
interactions between adjacent elements radiating at different
frequencies is minimized. The novel radiating structures can be
combined to provide a larger microwave array antenna.
STATEMENT OF THE OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION
The primary object of the present invention is to provide an
integrated function, multifrequency, multiaperture radiating
structure.
Another object of the present invention is to provide an integrated
function antenna structure which can be used in a limited space
environment.
A further object of the present invention is to provide a
multifrequency radiating structure consisting of interlaced sets of
radiating elements having various possible configurations.
Other objects and many of the attendant advantages of this
invention will be readily appreciated as the same becomes better
understood by reference to the following detailed description when
considered in connection with the accompanying drawings
wherein:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is an isometric view of a typical multiaperture,
multifrequency microwave radiating structure embodying the
inventive concept of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a front view of an alternate configuration of FIG. 1;
FIG. 3 is a front view of a radiating structure featuring ridged
S-band radiating elements;
FIG. 4 is a front view of a radiating structure featuring crossed
dipole C-band radiating elements;
FIG. 5 is a front view of a radiating element featuring
square-shaped C-band radiating elements; and
FIG. 6 is an illustration of the microwave energization technique
of the present invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
FIG. 1 illustrates an electromagnetic energy radiating structure 10
embodying the inventive concept disclosed herein. The substantially
rectangular radiating structure 10 consists of five columns, which
are illustrated in the vertical disposition, of C-band rectangular
waveguides 12 and X-band rectangular waveguides 14 arranged and
rigidly supported by conventional means in a contiguous,
face-to-face, i.e., horizontally stacked relationship with respect
to each other. The elements of the two sets are stacked in an
alternating fashion upon each other such that an X-band element 14
is stacked between two C-band elements 12.
The five columns consisting of the vertically polarized elements 12
and 14 are arranged and rigidly supported in an interlaced
contiguous manner between five columns consisting of four S-band
elements 16 which are shown stacked in an end-to-end, i.e.,
vertically manner. The S-band elements are horizontally polarized
for a very significant reason to be described hereinafter.
Symmetrically located and rigidly supported in a contiguous manner
between the structure consisting of elements 12, 14, and 16 are two
vertically polarized L-band elements 18.
Waveguides 12, 14 and 16 can be conventional waveguides, the design
and operation of which is well known to those skilled in the art.
Waveguide 18 can be of the type disclosed in U.S. Pat. No.
3,193,830, issued to Joseph H. Provencher on July 6, 1965, for a
Multifrequency Dual Ridge Waveguide Slot Antenna.
By proper design selection of the waveguide elements 12, 14, 16,
and 18, the structure 10 can, for example, provide a frequency
coverage from approximately 1 to 10 Ghz To provide this frequency
coverage, the dimensions of the various sets 12, 14, 16, and 18
would be selected such that the elements 18 radiate over the
frequency band of 1 to 2 Ghz, elements 16 radiate over 2 to 5 Ghz,
elements 12 radiate over 5 to 8 Ghz, and elements 16 radiate over 8
to 10 Ghz.
It should be understood that FIG. 1 is merely exemplary of one of
the many possible configurations of multifrequency, multiaperture
radiating elements as taught by the inventive concept disclosed
herein. For example, FIG. 2 illustrates a radiating structure 20
which, as can be seen, is very similar to the radiating structure
10 of FIG. 1. In the structure 20 of FIG. 2, however, X-band
coverage is provided by ridge elements 22 located and rigidly
supported within C-band elements 12. The S-band elements 16 and the
L-band elements 18 located and supported in approximately the same
manner as shown in FIG. 1.
In FIG. 3, a radiating structure 24 is illustrated which consists
of six columns of C-band elements 12 which are vertically spaced
and seven columns of S-band elements 16 which are vertically
stacked in an end-to-end manner. Located and supported
symmetrically with respect to the above described columns of
vertically polarized C-band elements 12 and horizontally polarized
S-band elements 16 are three ridged S-band radiating elements 26.
As can be seen the L-band elements 18 of FIGS. 1 and 2 have been
replaced by the ridged S-band 26, and X-band coverage is not
provided in this particular configuration.
In FIG. 4, a radiating structure 28 comprises seven columns
consisting of vertically polarized S-band elements 16 stacked in an
end-to-end manner and six columns consisting of a plurality of
crossed-dipole C-band elements 30. Each of the six columns of
elements 30 is located and supported in a contiguous manner between
two of the seven columns of elements 16; located and supported
symmetrically with respect to both sets of columns are two L-band
dual ridge elements 18. The C-band elements 30 could be, for
example, printed circuit dipoles.
In another possible configuration shown in FIG. 5, a radiating
structure 32 is shown as consisting of seven columns of
horizontally polarized S-band elements 16. Located and supported
between two of each of the seven columns is a column of vertically
spaced C-band elements 34 which, as can be seen, may have a square
shape. Again, L-band coverage is provided by elements 18.
In another possible configuration (not shown) the square-shaped
C-band elements 34 could be circular waveguides.
FIG. 6 illustrates the novel microwave energization technique which
constitutes an important aspect of the inventive concept disclosed
herein. In FIG. 6, a side view of the radiating structure 32 of
FIG. 5 is shown. For purposes of describing the energization
technique it is only necessary to consider the S-band elements 16
since the technique would be identical for the remaining radiating
elements. In the FIGURE, sending apparatus 36, which can be either
transmitting or receiving means, is connected to the input of four
power divider means 38 which are shown connected in parallel. An
output terminal 40 of each power divider 38 is connected by means
of a coaxial connector 44 located and supported at the closed end
of the waveguides 16 such that the waveguides are "end-fed." Each
power divider can feed a selectively predetermined number of
radiating elements. For example, each power divider 38 could have
seven output terminals 40 such that each power divider could be
used to energize a row of seven S-band elements 16.
The power dividers 38 can be either uniform distribution power
dividers or tapered distribution power dividers. If a uniform
distribution power divider is used, input energy from sending
apparatus 36 is equally divided at each power divider into, for
example, seven parts. Equal parts are then fed to each of the seven
S-band elements 16 to, in effect, form an array. If a tapered
distribution power divider is used, input energy from sending
apparatus 36 is divided into discrete parts having different phase
and amplitude characteristics. Tapered parts are then fed to each
of the seven S-band elements 16. Thus, it can be seen that by using
a tapered distribution power divider, each radiating element can,
in effect, be energized independently of the other radiating
elements.
As is well known, the size, shape, and position of the elements in
an array are set within closely defined limits by the space
requirements of the individual subarrays. The efficiency of each
subarray in turn depends upon a number of factors: the matching of
the elements, the radiating efficiency, the coupling between the
elements and the elements in other subarrays, and the resulting
higher-order modes which are excited. The design of transitions for
coupling energy out of unconventional waveguides and the design of
multiple probes to extract energy propagating in the higher-order
modes are very dependent upon the field configurations in the
waveguides. The far field pattern of these elements must not be so
highly directive as to excessively reduce antenna gain at large
scan angles.
The mode behavior of the individual conventional radiating elements
12, 14, and 16 of FIG. 1 is well known and will not be discussed.
However, the conventional methods of determining mode behavior are
somewhat ineffective for the lower frequency band (L-band)
waveguide element 18. Consequently, computers can be utilized to
aid in the determination of the mode behavior of the L-band element
18. This knowledge is essential since the L-band element 18 will
have many propagating modes in the total bandwidth of the antenna,
whereas the other waveguides 12, 14, and 16 will only propagate
over the upper half of the band and are not likely to do so in more
than one mode. The higher modes of the L-band waveguide 18, on the
other hand, are likely to couple energy from the other arrays and
re-radiate it in such a manner as to possibly severely degrade the
overall performance of the structure 10.
Different sectors of the array can be used in such a manner as to
reduce the effects of mutual coupling. For example, a fan beam
requires only a few rows of elements and a small part of the
overall array. Another sector of the array can be used for some
other function in the same frequency band and at a different
polarization. Synchronization of the different functions offer
other means of minimizing the coupling. It should be noted that in
accordance with the inventive concept, the choice of the array
geometry is arbitrary since the interlacing technique is applicable
to either a planar or curved geometry. However, as is well known to
those skilled in the art, benefits can accrue from certain curved
configurations which are not possible with planar geometries. The
type of beam steering or beam switching to be used would ultimately
be determined by the choice of array geometry.
As previously mentioned, the mutual coupling effects associated
with interlaced radiating elements can be severe and thus create
operational problems. One such problem is concerned with the
effects of mutual coupling between the various radiating elements
12, 14, 16, and 18 and the generation and possible propagation of
undesired higher order modes. Judicious choice of the dimensions
and orientation of the waveguide elements 12, 14, 16, and 18 can be
used to reduce the undesired modes. For example, the C-band
waveguide 12 and the X-band waveguide 14 can be cross-polarized
with respect to the S-band waveguides 16, and thus the mutual
coupling effects between these elements can be reduced by at least
an order of magnitude. It should be noted that the L-band waveguide
18 has the same polarization as the elements 12 and 14 and that the
L-band is capable of supporting the dominant mode as well as
higher-order modes operating in C-band.
In order to adequately analyze the coupling behavior between these
two frequency bands, a detailed knowledge of the fields that can
exist within the various waveguides must be obtained. By
determining the functional shape of the fields propagating in the
unconventional, doubly ridged waveguide 18, a good prediction of
the radiation patterns can be made. In addition, an indication of
the magnitude of the coupled energy can be obtained experimentally
by probing techniques.
Until the particular functions to be integrated and implemented in
a multi-aperture structure have been clearly defined, a discussion
of the techniques required to place the proper amplitude and phase
distribution at the individual antenna element terminals can only
be of a general nature. The techniques of feeding and scanning
planar and linear arrays are well known and will not be discussed
here. However, some of the methods of feeding and steering
circularly symmetrical arrays which are not generally known will be
given.
The common type of radiation patterns used for operational
microwave radiation systems include the fan beam, the pencil beam
and the quasi-omnidirectional type pattern.
The fan beam pattern usually requires a relatively small number of
radiating elements in the elevation plane and generally does not
require coverage for higher elevation angles. Beam to beam
switching times on the order of twenty-five microseconds can be
achieved using both true time delay and hybrid matrix methods in
combination with PIN diodes switches. Such techniques are readily
adaptable to the steering of circular arrays. For example, one
approach recently developed by the Government utilizes a microwave,
parallel-plate lens operating over a 20 percent frequency band,
thus assuring that the proper phase is applied to the terminals and
that it is scanned through 128 azimuth beam positions by means of
diode switches. This technique is disclosed in pending U.S. Pat.
application, Ser. No. 802,008, filed on Feb. 25, 1969, by Jerry E.
Boyns et al., for a Parallel-Plate Feed System for a Circular Array
Antenna.
Another approach utilizes diode phase shifters in combination with
diode switches to scan a ring array through one hundred and
twenty-eight beam positions. This technique is disclosed in pending
U.S. Pat. application, Ser. No. 838,730, filed June 30, 1969, by
John Reindel, for a Vector Transfer Feed System for a Circular
Array Antenna. Both of these techniques have been demonstrated
using a fan beam and have been successfully operated over a
relatively narrow bandwidth.
The pencil-beam pattern requires a large number of radiating
elements in both planes, and for most applications requiring this
type of radiation, the coverage of the entire half-hemisphere is
desired. The techniques discussed above can be extended to provide
this coverage, but, as previously discussed, certain geometries are
preferred. None of the techniques have been shown for scanning in
the elevation plane.
Quasi-omnidirectional coverage for air navigation functions
generally requires a symmetrical array for forming the azimuth
beam. Coverage above 60.degree. in elevation is generally not
necessary. A ring array can be used and fed with a power
distribution network with some form of modulation superimposed to
produce the desired azimuth radiation pattern. The hybrid matrix or
a microwave lens device can be used for a power distribution
network. The pattern can be electronically scanned by means of
diodes switches and phase shifters, or ferrite switches and phase
shifters.
The above discussion briefly describes some of the lesser known
techniques for circular symmetric-array feeding and steering. Many
of the techniques used for linear or planar arrays can also be
advantageously used and in some applications can be found to yield
good results with less complicated hardware. It must be emphasized
that the array feed system and scanning mechanisms must be tailored
to the particular function to be implemented and that in some
instances compromise must be made.
The concepts which have been discussed are many faceted and present
many engineering problems. Many of these problems can be analyzed
using a large scale computer and well known mathematical
techniques. The major problem, that of mutual inter-element
effects, can only be resolved by empirical approach. The values of
the coupling coefficients and their effect on impedance and
ultimately on the array excitation can only be arrived at by
experimental models. However, it should be noted that simulation
techniques have received considerable attention in recent years and
for a single frequency band have been effective in predicting array
impedance and performance under scanning conditions. Direct
impedance measurements can be made from a partial multifrequency
array to provide impedance data.
The structure 10 shown in FIG. 1 can be designed to function in
conjunction with PIN diode phase shifters and switches which are
used with either a microwave lens feed or a corporate feed
structure for beam scanning for the L-band and S-band, and ferrite
phase shifters for the C-band and X-band. Both azimuth and
elevation beam scanning should be provided to obtain the maximum
number of data. Furthermore, the use of the modular construction,
such as that shown in the drawing, allows the assembly of the
modules into several configurations, both planar and circular, so
that valid comparisons between the various techniques can be
made.
It should be noted that lens feeding techniques can be used to
implement the fan beam functions for the circular configurations.
If this is done, the various components should be designed for
maximum bandwidth, consistent with the array excitation hardware,
and integrated circuit techniques should be investigated.
Thus it can be seen that an integrated function microwave antenna
structure for radiating electromagnetic energy simultaneously at
several selectively predetermined different frequency bands has
been disclosed. The novel structure comprises multiple interlaced
sets of waveguides having various possible configurations which are
arranged and supported in a stacked manner with respect to each
other in a defined aperture area. Each of the multiple sets of
waveguides radiates over a particular frequency band and each of
the waveguides is energized independently of the other waveguides.
Thus the radiated beam from each of the waveguides can be steered
in either the horizontal or vertical plane.
Obviously many modifications and variations of the present
invention are possible in the light of the above teachings. It is
therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended
claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as
specifically described.
* * * * *