U.S. patent number 3,601,428 [Application Number 04/884,170] was granted by the patent office on 1971-08-24 for pronged joist hanger.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Simpson Company. Invention is credited to Tyrell T. Gilb.
United States Patent |
3,601,428 |
Gilb |
August 24, 1971 |
PRONGED JOIST HANGER
Abstract
A joist hanger formed with integral prongs which can be driven
into a wood joist by a hammer blow thereby eliminating or reducing
the number of nails required to fasten the hanger to the joist.
Other integral prongs increase the holding power of the hanger to
the header.
Inventors: |
Gilb; Tyrell T. (N/A, CA) |
Assignee: |
Company; Simpson (N/A)
|
Family
ID: |
25384101 |
Appl.
No.: |
04/884,170 |
Filed: |
December 11, 1969 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
403/232.1;
52/702; 248/217.3 |
Current CPC
Class: |
E04B
5/14 (20130101); E04B 1/2612 (20130101); F16B
15/0046 (20130101); F16B 9/052 (20180801); E04B
1/2608 (20130101); F16B 2200/503 (20180801); F16B
2015/0076 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
E04B
1/26 (20060101); E04B 5/14 (20060101); F16B
15/00 (20060101); F16B 003/00 () |
Field of
Search: |
;287/2.92L,20.94,20.95
;52/702,289 |
Foreign Patent Documents
Other References
6Popular Mechanics Magazine article "Engineered Nailing Simplifies
Framing," Aug. 1964 issue, pages 137, 138, 140, 139 cited. Copy
available in the Examiner's Files, Class 287, Subclass
20.94.
|
Primary Examiner: Williamowsky; David J.
Assistant Examiner: Shedd; Wayne L.
Claims
I CLAIM:
1. A joist hanger for supporting a wood joist said hanger having a
seat base, a pair of laterally spaced and parallel side members
connected to the seat base adapted for receiving the sides of said
wood joist therebetween, header engaging flanges extending
laterally from each of said side members, the improvement
comprising:
A. prong means consisting of an elongated portion and an angularly
related penetrating portion integrally formed in said hanger side
member and being bendable to a position in interlocking engagement
with said joist;
B. the axis of said prongs being substantially angularly related to
the direction of load placed on said hanger and substantially
angularly related to a direction perpendicular to the direction of
said load, and said penetrating portion of said prongs being
located to cross the grain of said wood joist;
C. each of said prong means being tapered to a point at its free
end and bent to approximately a right angle near said tapered
end.
2. A joist hanger as described in claim 1 wherein:
A. said prongs are laterally curved to provide rigidity so that
they may be hammered into the joists.
3. A joist hanger as described in claim 1 wherein:
A. at least a pair of said prongs are located at an angle of
45.degree. to the direction of the joist load.
Description
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Joist hangers have been in use for several years. These hangers
were formed with openings for nails which secured the joist to the
hanger. The gist of this invention is the discovery that prongs
formed integrally with the hanger can secure a joist to a hanger
and the hanger to a header.
An object of the invention is to provide a joist hanger which
eliminates or reduces the use of nails in securing the hanger to
the joist and the hanger to the header thereby effecting a savings
in time and materials.
Another objective is to position the prongs so as to maximize the
holding power of each prong.
Another objective is to increase the holding capacity of the hanger
to the header.
Still another objective is to construct a hanger having maximum
holding capacity and minimum weight.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a hanger constructed in accordance
with the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a perspective view of a hanger as shown in FIG. 1; the
broken lines indicating a joist and a header.
FIG. 3 is a side view of a hanger shown in FIG. 1.
FIG. 4 is a front elevation view of the hanger shown in FIG. 1.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
The joist hanger of the present invention consists briefly of a
base 1; joist sides 2 and 3 supporting the base adapted for
receiving the sides of a joist 4 and connected to header sides 6
and 7 for connection to a header 8; prong means 9 integrally formed
in the joist sides and being bendable to a position wherein a
portion 11 of the prongs are bendable to a position in interlocking
engagement with the joist.
The basic form of the hanger is standard, being made from a single
sheet of metal and is formed as shown in the drawings and as herein
described. The base is formed at right angles to the joist sides
and has varying widths depending upon the width of the joist to be
carried. The length of the base is determined by the load to be
carried. The joist sides are generally parallel and of a length
equal to or less than the height of the joist. The header sides are
bent at right angles to the joist sides and are preferably equal in
length to the joist sides.
There is little need in most cases for securing a joist to a joist
hanger since there is no live load vertically upward and the
holding power of nails provides far more holding power than is
required for wind or earth quake uplift design loads. Further, the
greatest force on the end of a beam is shear force and nailing of
the ends can decrease the ability of the beam to withstand shear
stress by inducing splitting of the ends of the joist or by the
inability to create uniform holding at the nailing points and the
base of the hanger. The latter problem results from the possible
use of smaller nails in the nail holes provided. Thus some nails
would not transfer any shear load to the sides of the joist hanger,
whereas others might transfer shear loads before the load is
transfered to the base.
This invention eliminates the need for securing the joist to the
joist hanger with nails by forming prongs integrally with the sides
of the hanger. These prongs are formed by dies which create an
elongated member 12 from the sides of the hanger, having a tapered
portion 13 coming to a sharp point 14. An approximately right
angled bend 16 is formed at a point between one half and three
fourths the distance of the prong from its root 17 so that a sharp
blow of a hammer on or near the bend area will drive the free,
pointed end into the outer surface of the side of the joist.
Since the prong does not penetrate as far into the joist as the
nails normally used, there is less tendency of the end of the joist
to split. The entire prong length is about an inch with less than
half of the length penetrating the joist.
Further, since the prongs are a part of the hanger itself, uniform
gripping of all of the prongs and the base of the hanger with the
joist is achieved.
There is an overall savings in material since nails are eliminated
between the joist and the hanger, but the primary advantage is the
labor savings in securing the joist to the hanger. The carpenter
can hold the joist and hanger with one hand and drive the prongs
into the joist with a hammer in the other hand. Usually, one sharp
blow with the hammer is all that is required to set the prong in
the joist.
To give the prongs rigidity so that they will be able to withstand
a hammer blow and will be driven into the joist without buckling,
they are formed with a lateral curvature.
It has been found that the angle at which the prongs are formed in
the hangers is extremely important. Since the load transferred from
the end of the joist to the header is in almost all cases nearly
vertical, it has been found that the gripping capacity of each
prong is substantially increased by placing the prongs in an
angular relation to the direction of the load indicated by arrow
18. Thus instead of the force of the loading tending to bend or
unbend the prong, the load is transferred to the prong at an angle
and a twisting force is translated to the prong. This twisting
force is transmitted to the root of the prong which is much more
effective in resisting a twisting force than a bending force.
Further, the slight lateral bending of the prong tends to increase
the prong's ability to transmit shear and bending forces from the
joist to the joist hanger. It has been found that a prong angle of
45.degree. to the load has a holding capacity two to three times as
much as a prong parallel or at 90.degree. to the direction of
load.
It is common to provide joist hangers with a base which is longer
than the average width of the joist sides of the hanger. Thus side
portions 19 and 20 connecting the base and joist sides form edges
22 and 23 angularly related to the base. It has been found that by
positioning the prongs 26 and 27 parallel to the edges 22 and 23,
greater gripping capacity between the joist and the hanger can be
obtained. It has been calculated that prongs 26 and 27 individually
carry a greater proportion of the joist load than the prongs 9. The
reason for this unexpected holding capacity is not fully
understood. One explanation for the fact that an angular
relationship of the prongs to the load will transfer more load from
the joist to the hanger is the fact that as the load comes on the
joist, it moves downwardly, causing the sides of the prongs, as for
example at point 31 to come in contact with the sides of the slot
at point 32. Thus force is transmitted to the side of the slot
formed by creation of the prong as well as to the root of the
prong. This does not explain the reason for prongs 26 and 27 taking
a greater share of the load except that there may be some
distortion of the side portion 19 and 20 near the base which may
cause more contact between the prong side and the edge of the slot
35.
Referring now to the side of the hanger in contact with the header,
the present invention consists of a plurality of prongs 37 located
on each side. Since the holding power of a prong is about
one-eighth of a nail holding value parallel to the load and
one-third a nail value when at a 45.degree. angle it is necessary
to continue to use nails in the header side and nail openings 38
are provided. The prongs in the header side are of the same shape
as the previously described prongs and are not further described
here. The header prongs are used primarily to hold the hanger in
place until the nails can be driven ,although they are used for
their added holding capacity. As may be seen in the drawings, the
prongs in the header side and in the joist sides are interspaced so
as to permit hammering a single prong without interference with
another prong. Note also that the prongs on the joist sides are not
directly opposite one another so that the beam is not weakened by
driving the prongs at the same elevation.
In order to lighten the hanger, scallops 39 may be cut in the
header sides. Similar cut outs 41 may be cut in the joist sides,
leaving protrusions 42 to provide sufficient clearance between the
prong slots and the edge of the material. Some codes require
seven-eighths inches to three-fourths inches edge clearance. Holes
42 and 43 are for tooling purposes and are purposely enlarged to
distinguish them from nailing holes.
* * * * *