U.S. patent number 3,553,345 [Application Number 04/630,648] was granted by the patent office on 1971-01-05 for vibration dampers.
This patent grant is currently assigned to N. Slater Company, a division of Slater Steel Industries Limited. Invention is credited to Aubrey T. Edwards.
United States Patent |
3,553,345 |
Edwards |
January 5, 1971 |
VIBRATION DAMPERS
Abstract
A vibration damper including a wire supported by a clamp, said
vibration damper comprising an elongated damping member secured to
inhibit longitudinal movement along the wire and having rigidity
and character to damp substantial amounts of vibrational energy.
The weight per foot of the damping member is in the range of from
about 20 percent to about 125 percent of the weight per foot of the
wire. The minimum length of the damping member is approximately 3
feet. At least a portion of the damping member is in contact with
the wire and the damping member is free to move relative to the
wire whereby impact between the wire and portion of the damping
member dissipates said vibrational energy.
Inventors: |
Edwards; Aubrey T. (Oakville,
CA) |
Assignee: |
N. Slater Company, a division of
Slater Steel Industries Limited (Hamilton, Ontario,
CA)
|
Family
ID: |
4142505 |
Appl.
No.: |
04/630,648 |
Filed: |
April 13, 1967 |
Foreign Application Priority Data
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 15, 1966 [CA] |
|
|
958,048 |
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
174/42;
188/381 |
Current CPC
Class: |
H02G
7/14 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
H02G
7/00 (20060101); H02G 7/14 (20060101); H02g
007/14 () |
Field of
Search: |
;174/42 ;188/1B
;248/54,58,63 |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Foreign Patent Documents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126,047 |
|
Dec 1931 |
|
OE |
|
611,556 |
|
Mar 1935 |
|
DT |
|
632,509 |
|
Jul 1936 |
|
DT |
|
Other References
Peterson, German printed application No. 1,055,074, published April
16, 1. Copy in 174-42..
|
Primary Examiner: Askin; Laramie E.
Claims
I claim:
1. A vibration damper including a wire supported by a clamp, said
vibration damper comprising:
a. an elongated tube surrounding said wire and secured to inhibit
longitudinal movement along said wire and having rigidity and
character to damp substantial amounts of vibrational energy;
b. the weight per foot of said tube being in the range of from
about 20 percent to about 125 percent of the weight per foot of
said wire;
c. at least a portion of said tube being in contact with said wire;
and
d. said tube being free to move relative to said wire whereby
impact between said wire and a portion of said tube dissipates said
vibrational energy.
2. A vibration damper as claimed in claim 1 wherein a clamp is
provided to prevent longitudinal movement of said tube relative to
said wire.
3. A vibration damper as claimed in claim 2 wherein said clamp
comprises a pair of substantially hemispherical members for
gripping said tube and said wire.
4. A vibration damper as claimed in claim 2 wherein a split sleeve
is inserted between said tube and said clamp.
5. A vibration damper as claimed in claim 1 wherein said tube
comprises semiconducting rubber.
6. A vibration damper as claimed in claim 1 wherein a slit is
provided along the length of a wall of said tube.
7. A vibration damper as claimed in claim 6 wherein at least one
clamp is provided to prevent the slit from opening when the tube
has been installed on the wire.
Description
This invention relates to vibration dampers and more particularly
to impact vibration dampers for overhead wires such as transmission
line conductors, ground wires, guy wires or the like.
Overhead wires are subject to a number of different processes from
which vibration can develop. The two types of greatest importance
are referred to as aeolian vibration and galloping or "dancing"
wires.
Aeolian vibration occurs in relatively light winds usually from one
to about 15 miles per hour and results from eddies which form on
the lee side of the wire. When the frequency of the eddies
coincides with one of the many natural frequencies of the wire, the
forces arising from the eddies cause vibration to occur. This type
of vibration is usually present for 50 percent of the time and
normally if permitted to occur without adequate control results in
mechanical failure of the wire, sometimes within a very short
period of time.
Galloping of wires or conductors usually, although not always,
occurs during or after an icing storm. Ice forms on the windward
side of the conductor and the resulting airfoil gives rise to
aerodynamic lift and drag forces which cause the conductor to
vibrate. The winds giving rise to the phenomenon normally range
from about 10 to 35 miles per hour. The frequency of vibration is
usually in the range of 0.25 to 0.5 cycles per second with
amplitudes up to about 30 feet peak to peak. This compares with 3
to 150 cycles per second and a peak to peak amplitude equal to the
conductor diameter for aeolian vibration. The principal difficulty
arising from galloping is that the conductors constituting the
transmission line collide with each other or move sufficiently
close to each other to cause short circuits between them. This
results in outages and the line becomes inoperative, sometimes for
many hours.
This invention is directed to the control of these two types of
vibration but is also applicable to other types referred to but not
described herein. It involves the use of loose members on or about
the wire. For example, these may take the form of tubes surrounding
or rods on top of the wire. It has been found that many materials,
e.g. metal, wood, plastic and elastomers are effective for this
purpose. An important consideration is that the tube or rod be free
to move relatively to the wire so that under conditions of
vibration collision or impact occurs between the damper and wire.
In the case of a tube surrounding the wire clearance between the
inside wall of the tube and the wire need only be a few thousandths
of an inch, although for practical purposes a minimum radial
clearance of say 0.030 inches is used. The impacts cause energy in
the moving parts to be given up in the form of heat and result in a
greatly increased capacity for dissipating vibration energy as
compared with that inherent in the wire alone. This principle,
which is employed in the impact damper, effectively controls the
vibration to workable and safe levels. It is particularly effective
for small wires and for large wires for controlling vibration at
the upper end of the vibration frequency spectrum where
conventional dampers tend to be marginally effective and are
subject to fatigue failure themselves.
The damper in accordance with this invention provides a simple yet
efficient, low cost damper which is effective in controlling
aeolian vibration from about 8 cycles per second throughout the
frequency range encountered in aeolian vibration.
The present invention further provides a damper which is easily
installed and which requires a minimum of engineering time as the
location of the damper in the span has little if any effect on its
performance. It is therefore simply a matter of selecting the size
and quantity of dampers for the particular conductor span.
Accordingly the present invention provides a vibration damper for
an overhead transmission line or the like including a wire
supported by a clamp, the vibration damper comprising an elongated
member at least a portion of which rests on the wire and is free to
move relative to the wire whereby impact between the wire and a
portion of the member dissipates vibration energy.
In the accompanying drawings:
FIG. 1 shows vibration characteristics of an undamped conductor and
conductors equipped with a conventional damper and various impact
dampers in accordance with this invention.
FIG. 2 shows the vibration characteristics of a conductor equipped
with an impact damper in accordance with this invention comprising
2, 3, 4, 6 and 12 -foot lengths of aluminum rod.
FIG. 3 shows graphically the minimum length of free impact damper
in feet for satisfactory vibration control plotted against
conductor weight in pounds per foot.
FIG. 4 shows graphically maximum bending amplitude plotted against
frequency of 3/8-inch ground cable provided with a conventional
damper as compared with two 4 -foot lengths of tubing type impact
damper in accordance with this invention. The bending amplitude was
measured by the method defined in the I.E.E.E. Task Force paper No.
31 CP 65--156 dated January 31, 1965 entitled Standardization of
Conductor Vibration Measurements.
FIG. 5 is a perspective view of a portion of a suspended conductor
provided with a vibration damper in accordance with this
invention.
FIG. 6 is a perspective view of a portion of a suspended conductor
provided with an alternate form of vibration damper.
FIG. 7 is a sectional side elevational view of a portion of the
vibration damper of FIG. 6.
FIG. 8 is a sectional view taken along the line 8-8 of FIG. 6.
FIG. 9 shows an alternative clamping arrangement for use with the
vibration damper of FIG. 6.
FIGS. 10, 11, 12 and 13 are perspective views of alternate forms of
the invention.
Referring now in detail to the drawings, FIGS. 1 to 4 show typical
performance characteristics of impact dampers. FIG. 1 shows the
results of tests on an indoor laboratory span of a medium size
power conductor of about 1 inch in diameter. An 80 -foot span is
excited by a constant force over a wide range of frequencies. The
resulting conductor loop velocity for an undampered conductor is
compared with the same conductor fitted with conventional dampers
and loose-fitting rods and tubes. The graph demonstrates the
remarkable ability of the impact damper to control vibration over a
wide range of frequencies. It will be seen that the particular
conventional damper used for this comparison is relatively
ineffective in the 40 cycle per second range which is in the
conductor vibration frequency spectrum that occurs on operating
lines. FIG. 2 demonstrates the effect of various lengths of impact
dampers showing that for this particular size of damper there is
little advantage in using lengths greater than 6 feet.
There is also an optimum weight of damper, i.e. weight per foot
above which little apparently is gained in damping efficiently by
varying the weight per foot of the damper. This weight per foot of
the damper appears to be in the range of about 10 percent to about
200 percent of the weight per foot of the conductor and is
preferably in the range of about 30 percent to 125 percent of the
weight of the conductor or wire. FIG. 3 shows the minimum length of
free damper versus conductor weight for damper to conductor a
weight ratio of 1 to 3. Increasing the length of damper over some
optimum length for the range of frequencies normally encountered
with aeolian vibration does not appear to provide additional
vibration control.
FIG. 4 shows field results using the impact type damper which
demonstrates the relative effectiveness of a single conventional
damper compared with two 4-foot lengths of rubber tube on a
3/8-inch diameter steel cable. This illustrates the remarkable
damping efficiency of the impact damper at high frequencies and
indicates that it has fully satisfactory vibration control over the
whole frequency spectrum. Similar results have been obtained for
impact dampers allowed to work their way into the middle of the
span. The vibration damping effectiveness of the impact damper is
independent of conductor tension and temperature. It is necessary
though for the material to be capable of withstanding the operating
conditions. For example, materials are available for temperatures
in excess of 300.degree. F. at which conductors are operated. These
materials also have brittle points well below 60.degree. F.
In FIG. 5 one form of an impact vibration damper in accordance with
this invention is indicated generally by the numeral 10. The damper
10 is shown in use on a conductor 12 which is suspended from a
supporting tower (not shown) by a conventional clamp 14.
The damper 10 comprises an elongated member in the form of a length
of tube or rod 15. The tube or rod 15 may be of such materials as
steel, aluminum or semirigid plastic and a wooden dowel may also be
used. The impact damper 10 is secured to the conductor 12 by the
clamp 14 or by any convenient means. It will be noted however that
at least a portion of the vibration damper 10 rests on the
conductor. This can be accomplished by having one end of the
elongated member 15 secured in the clamp so that the free end of
the member 15 will be resting loosely on the conductor 12.
Alternatively a double length of tube or rod 15 may be used and
when clamped adjacent its midportion provides a damper 10 at each
side of the clamp 14.
In FIG. 6 an alternate form of a vibration damper in accordance
with this invention is shown generally at 20. The damper 20 is
installed on the conductor 12 adjacent the clamp 14 described with
reference to FIG. 5.
The damper 20 comprises a length of tubing 22 provided with a slit
23 extending throughout its length to permit installation of the
damper 20 on an existing conductor. It will be appreciated however
that the slit 23 in the sidewall of the tube would not be necessary
if the tubing 22 were to be inserted over the conductor 12 before
it is suspended from the supporting towers.
The damper 20 preferably comprises a synthetic plastic material
such as for example ethylene propylene terpolymer or polyethylene.
It is desirable to provide a semiconducting material to minimize
deterioration caused by an electrical phenomenon known as tracking.
Ethylene Propylene Terpolymer was selected as it combines all the
desirable features of maximum damping, resistance to its
environment, conductivity and uniformity of performance over a wide
atmospheric temperature range in an economical material. The use of
the semiconducting rubber and careful dimensional control minimizes
radio or television interference. An annular clamp 24 may be
provided to keep the slit 23 from opening after the tubing 22 has
been installed on the conductor 12. The end of the tubing 22
adjacent the suspension clamp 14 is preferably provided with a
clamp 25 if it is desirable to locate the damper 20 for easy
accessibility from the tower. It is noted however that the damper
20 may be located anywhere on the conductor 12 and be free to move
axially therealong while performing the desired function.
The clamp 25 shown more clearly in FIG. 7 comprises two
substantially hemispherical portions 30 and 31 secured together by
bolts 32 as shown in FIG. 6. The clamp 25 is adapted to grip the
conductor 12 as well as the associated end of the tubing 22. The
clamp 25 is so shaped as not to be a source of corona
discharge.
It will also be appreciated that it is desirable to have a clamping
system designed to provide minimum contact pressure thus reducing
compression set of the elastomer which would otherwise result in
loss of the clamping function.
In manufacturing the tube-type damper 20, it is very important to
provide a uniform internal diameter throughout, otherwise the
damper will not have the necessary loose fit on the conductor. To
avoid distortion extruded tubes of large cross section should be
cured on mandrels. Furthermore the damper must be straight and
therefore it is necessary to take precautions to prevent any
permanent set or deformation resulting from handling, shipping or
storing. It has been found that packing the tube-type dampers
tightly in crates or packaging individual dampers in tubular
containers alleviates this problem.
In FIG. 9 an alternative clamping arrangement is shown wherein a
split sleeve 40 is inserted between the conductor 12 and the damper
20 to increase the effectiveness of a clamp 24', similar to clamp
24, provided on this portion of the damper 20. The sleeve 40 and
clamp 24' perform the same function as the clamp 30 described above
with reference to FIG. 6.
Alternative forms of impact dampers in accordance with this
invention are generally indicated at 10a, 10b, 10c and 10d in FIGS.
10, 11, 12 and 13 respectively.
In FIG. 10 the damper 10a comprises a member 15a having a
semiannular cross section. The damper 10b in FIG. 11 comprises a
member 15b having a varying cross section of alternate rod and slit
tube configuration. The damper 10c in FIG. 12 comprises a member
15c of uniform cross section so shaped as to make contact at one or
more points. It will be appreciated that dampers 10a and 10b
provide for dissipation of heat generated in the conductor. The
damper 10 of FIG. 6 may also be provided with apertures to
dissipate heat. Alternatively as shown in FIG. 13, a member 15d is
provided which is in the form of a tube having alternating portions
of two different diameters.
The impact dampers described have the advantages of simplicity,
ease of manufacture and economy and open up the possibility of
economically increasing conductor operating mechanical tension
while maintaining vibration at acceptable levels. Hitherto this has
been inhibited due to the difficulty of controlling the vibration
problem and because of the high cost of conventional vibration
dampers. The tube type damper also has been found to have a
substantial measure of control over galloping conductors. Firstly,
the tube completely covers the conductor and thus reduces the
tendency of ice to lock the damper to the conductor. This allows
the damper to move over most of its length relative to the
conductor thereby permitting the impact principle to be used in the
presence of ice. As shown more clearly in FIG. 8 the damper 20 is
installed with the slit 23 at the underside of the conductor to
make it more difficult for water to enter the damper 20. This
arrangement thus minimizes the danger of ice locking the damper 20
to the conductor 12. Furthermore, by distributing the dampers along
the conductor to cover between 10 and 20 percent of its length, a
substantial measure of control of galloping is obtained.
Observation on a 5-mile line of four circuits of 1.6 in. dia.,
conductor supported by a common steel structure, two of which were
fitted with distributed impact dampers, showed that the critical
velocity to induce galloping has been increased from about 8 miles
per hour to about 25 miles per hour and that above this velocity
the amplitude was reduced generally by about 50 percent compared
with the undamped conductors. The principle used here is to inhibit
the development of a relatively high frequency wave which would
initiate galloping by travelling up and down the conductor span
picking up energy from the wind. If unchecked this wave gradually
builds up and eventually locks into one of the first four vibration
modes of the conductor, usually the first or the second causing
short circuiting. This vibration may also cause destruction of the
transmission line or supporting structures.
Although the term conductor is used herebefore however, the
vibration damper of this invention is applicable to any overhead
wires such as for example guy wires.
* * * * *