Backplanes with hexagonal and triangular electrodes Patent Grant Tsai , et al. June 7, 2 [Nuclera Nucleics Ltd.]

Backplanes with hexagonal and triangular electrodes

Tsai , et al. June 7, 2

Patent Grant 11353759

U.S. patent number 11,353,759 [Application Number 16/572,022] was granted by the patent office on 2022-06-07 for backplanes with hexagonal and triangular electrodes. This patent grant is currently assigned to Nuclera Nucleics Ltd.. The grantee listed for this patent is Nuclera Nucleics Ltd.. Invention is credited to Ian French, Richard J. Paolini, Jr., Annie Tsai, Cristina Visani, David Zhitomirsky.

United States Patent	11,353,759
Tsai , et al.	June 7, 2022

Backplanes with hexagonal and triangular electrodes

Abstract

Active matrix backplanes including an array of hexagonal electrodes or an array of triangular electrodes. Because the backplane designs route the gate lines along the periphery of the electrodes there is less cross talk with the surface of the electrode. The disclosed designs simplify construction and control of the electrodes and improve the regularity of the electric field above the electrode. Such backplane electrode designs may be particularly useful in electrowetting on dielectric (EWoD) devices and electrophoretic displays (EPD).

Inventors:

Tsai; Annie (Hsinshu, TW), French; Ian (Hsinchu, TW), Visani; Cristina (Cambridge, MA), Zhitomirsky; David (Woburn, MA), Paolini, Jr.; Richard J. (Framingham, MA)

Applicant:

Name	City	State	Country	Type
Nuclera Nucleics Ltd.	Cambridge	MA	US

Assignee:

Nuclera Nucleics Ltd. (Cambridge, GB)

Family ID:

1000006352895

Appl. No.:

16/572,022

Filed:

September 16, 2019

Prior Publication Data


	Document Identifier	Publication Date
	US 20200089035 A1	Mar 19, 2020

Related U.S. Patent Documents


Application Number	Filing Date	Patent Number	Issue Date
62732421	Sep 17, 2018

Current U.S. Class:	1/1
Current CPC Class:	G02F 1/136286 (20130101); G02F 1/167 (20130101); H01L 27/1222 (20130101); H01L 27/1259 (20130101); G02F 1/1368 (20130101); H01L 27/124 (20130101); G02F 2201/123 (20130101)
Current International Class:	G02F 1/1368 (20060101); G02F 1/1362 (20060101); H01L 27/12 (20060101); G02F 1/167 (20190101)
Field of Search:	;345/107

References Cited [Referenced By]

U.S. Patent Documents


4573995	March 1986	Chen et al.
4708716	November 1987	Sibalis
5080646	January 1992	Theeuwes et al.
5311337	May 1994	McCartney, Jr.
5535028	July 1996	Bae
5930026	July 1999	Jacobson et al.
6046790	April 2000	Hara
6118426	September 2000	Albert et al.
6124851	September 2000	Jacobson
6130773	October 2000	Jacobson et al.
6177921	January 2001	Comiskey et al.
6232950	May 2001	Albert et al.
6241921	June 2001	Jacobson et al.
6252564	June 2001	Albert et al.
6312304	November 2001	Duthaler et al.
6312971	November 2001	Amundson et al.
6376828	April 2002	Comiskey
6392786	May 2002	Albert
6413790	July 2002	Duthaler et al.
6422687	July 2002	Jacobson
6445374	September 2002	Albert et al.
6445489	September 2002	Jacobson et al.
6473072	October 2002	Comiskey et al.
6480182	November 2002	Turner et al.
6498114	December 2002	Amundson et al.
6504524	January 2003	Gates et al.
6506438	January 2003	Duthaler et al.
6512354	January 2003	Jacobson
6518949	February 2003	Drzaic
6521489	February 2003	Duthaler et al.
6531997	March 2003	Gates et al.
6535197	March 2003	Comiskey et al.
6545291	April 2003	Amundson et al.
6611107	August 2003	Mikami et al.
6639578	October 2003	Comiskey et al.
6657772	December 2003	Loxley
6664944	December 2003	Albert et al.
D485294	January 2004	Albert
6680725	January 2004	Jacobson
6683333	January 2004	Kazlas et al.
6704133	March 2004	Gates et al.
6710540	March 2004	Albert et al.
6724519	April 2004	Comiskey et al.
6738050	May 2004	Comiskey et al.
6750473	June 2004	Amundson et al.
6753999	June 2004	Zehner et al.
6816147	November 2004	Albert
6819471	November 2004	Amundson et al.
6825068	November 2004	Denis et al.
6825829	November 2004	Albert et al.
6825970	November 2004	Goenaga et al.
6831769	December 2004	Holman et al.
6842167	January 2005	Albert et al.
6842279	January 2005	Amundson
6842657	January 2005	Drzaic et al.
6865010	March 2005	Duthaler et al.
6873452	March 2005	Tseng et al.
6900851	May 2005	Morrison et al.
6909532	June 2005	Chung et al.
6922276	July 2005	Zhang et al.
6950220	September 2005	Abramson et al.
6967640	November 2005	Albert et al.
6980196	December 2005	Turner et al.
6982178	January 2006	LeCain et al.
6995550	February 2006	Jacobson et al.
7002728	February 2006	Pullen et al.
7012600	March 2006	Zehner et al.
7012735	March 2006	Honeyman et al.
7023420	April 2006	Comiskey et al.
7030412	April 2006	Drzaic et al.
7030854	April 2006	Baucom et al.
7034783	April 2006	Gates et al.
7061166	June 2006	Kuniyasu
7061662	June 2006	Chung et al.
7075502	July 2006	Drzaic et al.
7075703	July 2006	O'Neil et al.
7106296	September 2006	Jacobson
7110163	September 2006	Webber et al.
7116318	October 2006	Amundson et al.
7116466	October 2006	Whitesides et al.
7119759	October 2006	Zehner et al.
7119772	October 2006	Amundson et al.
7148128	December 2006	Jacobson
7163612	January 2007	Sterling et al.
7167155	January 2007	Albert et al.
7170670	January 2007	Webber
7173752	February 2007	Doshi et al.
7176880	February 2007	Amundson et al.
7177066	February 2007	Chung et al.
7190008	March 2007	Amundson et al.
7193625	March 2007	Danner et al.
7202847	April 2007	Gates
7206119	April 2007	Honeyman et al.
7223672	May 2007	Kazlas et al.
7230751	June 2007	Whitesides et al.
7242514	July 2007	Chung et al.
7256766	August 2007	Albert et al.
7259744	August 2007	Arango et al.
7280094	October 2007	Albert
7301693	November 2007	Chaug et al.
7304780	December 2007	Liu et al.
7304787	December 2007	Whitesides et al.
7312784	December 2007	Baucom et al.
7312794	December 2007	Zehner et al.
7327346	February 2008	Chung et al.
7327511	February 2008	Whitesides et al.
7347957	March 2008	Wu et al.
7349148	March 2008	Doshi et al.
7352353	April 2008	Albert et al.
7365394	April 2008	Denis et al.
7365733	April 2008	Duthaler et al.
7382363	June 2008	Albert et al.
7388572	June 2008	Duthaler et al.
7401758	July 2008	Liang et al.
7408699	August 2008	Wang et al.
7411719	August 2008	Paolini, Jr. et al.
7420549	September 2008	Jacobson et al.
7442587	October 2008	Amundson et al.
7453445	November 2008	Amundson
7471274	December 2008	Kim
7492339	February 2009	Amundson
7492497	February 2009	Paolini, Jr. et al.
7528822	May 2009	Amundson et al.
7535624	May 2009	Amundson et al.
7545358	June 2009	Gates et al.
7551346	June 2009	Fazel et al.
7554712	June 2009	Patry et al.
7560004	July 2009	Pereira et al.
7583251	September 2009	Arango et al.
7583427	September 2009	Danner et al.
7598173	October 2009	Ritenour et al.
7602374	October 2009	Zehner et al.
7605799	October 2009	Amundson et al.
7612760	November 2009	Kawai
7636191	December 2009	Duthaler
7649674	January 2010	Danner et al.
7667886	February 2010	Danner et al.
7672040	March 2010	Sohn et al.
7679599	March 2010	Kawai
7679813	March 2010	Liang et al.
7679814	March 2010	Paolini, Jr. et al.
7683606	March 2010	Kang et al.
7688297	March 2010	Zehner et al.
7688497	March 2010	Danner et al.
7705824	April 2010	Baucom et al.
7729039	June 2010	LeCain et al.
7733311	June 2010	Amundson et al.
7733335	June 2010	Zehner et al.
7785988	August 2010	Amundson et al.
7787169	August 2010	Abramson et al.
7830592	November 2010	Sprague et al.
7839564	November 2010	Whitesides et al.
7843626	November 2010	Amundson et al.
7859637	December 2010	Amundson et al.
7859742	December 2010	Chiu et al.
7880958	February 2011	Zang et al.
7893435	February 2011	Kazlas et al.
7898717	March 2011	Patry et al.
7905977	March 2011	Qi et al.
7952557	May 2011	Amundson et al.
7956841	June 2011	Albert et al.
7957053	June 2011	Honeyman et al.
7982479	July 2011	Wang et al.
7986450	July 2011	Cao et al.
7999787	August 2011	Amundson et al.
8009344	August 2011	Danner et al.
8009348	August 2011	Zehner et al.
8027081	September 2011	Danner et al.
8049947	November 2011	Danner et al.
8064962	November 2011	Wilcox et al.
8072675	December 2011	Lin et al.
8077141	December 2011	Duthaler et al.
8089453	January 2012	Comiskey et al.
8120836	February 2012	Lin et al.
8125501	February 2012	Amundson et al.
8139050	March 2012	Jacobson et al.
8149228	April 2012	Lin et al.
8159636	April 2012	Sun et al.
8159644	April 2012	Takatori
8173000	May 2012	Hadwen et al.
8174490	May 2012	Whitesides et al.
8208193	June 2012	Patry et al.
8237892	August 2012	Sprague et al.
8238021	August 2012	Sprague et al.
8243013	August 2012	Sprague et al.
8274472	September 2012	Wang et al.
8289250	October 2012	Zehner et al.
8300006	October 2012	Zhou et al.
8305341	November 2012	Arango et al.
8314784	November 2012	Ohkami et al.
8319759	November 2012	Jacobson et al.
8362488	January 2013	Chaug et al.
8373211	February 2013	Amundson et al.
8373649	February 2013	Low et al.
8384658	February 2013	Albert et al.
8389381	March 2013	Amundson et al.
8395836	March 2013	Lin
8419273	April 2013	Hadwen et al.
8437069	May 2013	Lin
8441414	May 2013	Lin
8456414	June 2013	Lin et al.
8456589	June 2013	Sprague et al.
8462102	June 2013	Wong et al.
8498042	July 2013	Danner et al.
8514168	August 2013	Chung et al.
8525966	September 2013	Takatori
8529743	September 2013	Kim et al.
8537105	September 2013	Chiu et al.
8547111	October 2013	Hadwen et al.
8547628	October 2013	Wu et al.
8553012	October 2013	Baucom et al.
8558783	October 2013	Wilcox et al.
8558785	October 2013	Zehner et al.
8558786	October 2013	Lin
8558855	October 2013	Sprague et al.
8576162	November 2013	Kang et al.
8576164	November 2013	Sprague et al.
8576259	November 2013	Lin et al.
8593396	November 2013	Amundson et al.
8605032	December 2013	Liu et al.
8610988	December 2013	Zehner et al.
8643595	February 2014	Chung et al.
8653832	February 2014	Hadwen et al.
8654571	February 2014	John et al.
8665206	March 2014	Lin et al.
8681191	March 2014	Yang et al.
8714780	May 2014	Ho et al.
8728266	May 2014	Danner et al.
8730153	May 2014	Sprague et al.
8743077	June 2014	Sprague
8754859	June 2014	Gates et al.
8764958	July 2014	Wang
8791891	July 2014	Van Dijk et al.
8797258	August 2014	Sprague
8797633	August 2014	Sprague et al.
8797636	August 2014	Yang et al.
8810525	August 2014	Sprague
8810882	August 2014	Heikenfeld et al.
8815070	August 2014	Wang et al.
8828336	September 2014	Hadwen et al.
8830560	September 2014	Danner et al.
8853645	October 2014	Okada et al.
8891155	November 2014	Danner et al.
8928562	January 2015	Gates et al.
8928641	January 2015	Chiu et al.
8958044	February 2015	Takatori
8969886	March 2015	Amundson
8976444	March 2015	Zhang et al.
8980075	March 2015	Cheng et al.
8994705	March 2015	Jacobson et al.
9013394	April 2015	Lin
9019197	April 2015	Lin
9019198	April 2015	Lin et al.
9019318	April 2015	Sprague et al.
9025234	May 2015	Lin
9025238	May 2015	Chan et al.
9030374	May 2015	Sprague et al.
9082352	July 2015	Cheng et al.
9140952	September 2015	Sprague et al.
9147364	September 2015	Wu et al.
9152003	October 2015	Danner et al.
9152004	October 2015	Paolini, Jr. et al.
9171508	October 2015	Sprague et al.
9201279	December 2015	Wu et al.
9216414	December 2015	Chu
9218773	December 2015	Sun et al.
9223164	December 2015	Lai et al.
9224338	December 2015	Chan et al.
9224342	December 2015	Sprague et al.
9224344	December 2015	Chung et al.
9230492	January 2016	Harrington et al.
9245484	January 2016	Yamazaki et al.
9251736	February 2016	Lin et al.
9262973	February 2016	Wu et al.
9269311	February 2016	Amundson
9285648	March 2016	Liu et al.
9299294	March 2016	Lin et al.
9310661	April 2016	Wu et al.
9336731	May 2016	Long et al.
9373289	June 2016	Sprague et al.
9390066	July 2016	Smith et al.
9390661	July 2016	Chiu et al.
9412314	August 2016	Amundson et al.
9419024	August 2016	Ritenour et al.
9454057	September 2016	Wu et al.
9458543	October 2016	Hadwen
9460666	October 2016	Sprague et al.
9495918	November 2016	Harrington et al.
9501981	November 2016	Lin et al.
9513743	December 2016	Sjodin et al.
9514667	December 2016	Lin
9529240	December 2016	Paolini, Jr. et al.
9542895	January 2017	Gates et al.
9564088	February 2017	Wilcox et al.
9582041	February 2017	Cheng et al.
9612502	April 2017	Danner et al.
9620048	April 2017	Sim et al.
9620066	April 2017	Bishop
9620067	April 2017	Harrington et al.
9632373	April 2017	Huang et al.
9666142	May 2017	Hung
9671635	June 2017	Paolini, Jr.
9672766	June 2017	Sjodin
9679185	June 2017	Chin
9691333	June 2017	Cheng et al.
9721495	August 2017	Harrington et al.
9778500	October 2017	Gates et al.
9792861	October 2017	Chang et al.
9792862	October 2017	Hung et al.
9805668	October 2017	Agostinelli et al.
9815056	November 2017	Wu et al.
9841653	December 2017	Wu et al.
9847356	December 2017	Peng et al.
9921451	March 2018	Telfer et al.
9966018	May 2018	Gates et al.
10018828	July 2018	Massard
10027329	July 2018	Wu
10037735	July 2018	Amundson
10048563	August 2018	Paolini, Jr. et al.
10048564	August 2018	Paolini, Jr. et al.
10190743	January 2019	Hertel et al.
10229641	March 2019	Yang et al.
10319313	June 2019	Harris et al.
2002/0060321	May 2002	Kazlas et al.
2002/0090980	July 2002	Wilcox et al.
2003/0102858	June 2003	Jacobson et al.
2004/0085619	May 2004	Wu et al.
2004/0105036	June 2004	Danner et al.
2004/0119681	June 2004	Albert et al.
2004/0246562	December 2004	Chung et al.
2005/0122306	June 2005	Wilcox et al.
2005/0122563	June 2005	Honeyman et al.
2005/0253777	November 2005	Zehner et al.
2006/0255322	November 2006	Wu et al.
2007/0052757	March 2007	Jacobson
2007/0091418	April 2007	Danner et al.
2007/0103427	May 2007	Zhou et al.
2007/0176912	August 2007	Beames et al.
2007/0285385	December 2007	Albert et al.
2008/0024429	January 2008	Zehner
2008/0024482	January 2008	Gates et al.
2008/0136774	June 2008	Harris et al.
2008/0154179	June 2008	Cantor et al.
2008/0303780	December 2008	Sprague et al.
2009/0122389	May 2009	Whitesides et al.
2009/0174651	July 2009	Jacobson et al.
2009/0315044	December 2009	Amundson et al.
2009/0322721	December 2009	Zehner et al.
2010/0128341	May 2010	Cheng
2010/0177396	July 2010	Lin
2010/0194733	August 2010	Lin et al.
2010/0194789	August 2010	Lin et al.
2010/0220121	September 2010	Zehner et al.
2010/0225611	September 2010	Lee et al.
2010/0265561	October 2010	Gates et al.
2011/0063314	March 2011	Chiu et al.
2011/0140744	June 2011	Kazlas et al.
2011/0175875	July 2011	Lin
2011/0187683	August 2011	Wilcox et al.
2011/0193840	August 2011	Amundson et al.
2011/0193841	August 2011	Amundson et al.
2011/0199671	August 2011	Amundson et al.
2011/0204375	August 2011	Yagi
2011/0221740	September 2011	Yang et al.
2011/0292319	December 2011	Cole
2012/0001957	January 2012	Liu et al.
2012/0098740	April 2012	Chiu et al.
2012/0273702	November 2012	Culbertson et al.
2012/0293858	November 2012	Telfer et al.
2013/0063333	March 2013	Arango et al.
2013/0146459	June 2013	Bazant et al.
2013/0161193	June 2013	Jacobs et al.
2013/0194250	August 2013	Amundson et al.
2013/0249782	September 2013	Wu et al.
2014/0009817	January 2014	Wilcox et al.
2014/0078024	March 2014	Paolini, Jr. et al.
2014/0192000	July 2014	Hung et al.
2014/0204012	July 2014	Wu et al.
2014/0210701	July 2014	Wu et al.
2014/0240210	August 2014	Wu
2014/0253425	September 2014	Zalesky et al.
2014/0293398	October 2014	Wang et al.
2015/0097877	April 2015	Lin et al.
2015/0261057	September 2015	Harris et al.
2015/0262255	September 2015	Khajehnouri et al.
2015/0262551	September 2015	Zehner et al.
2015/0378235	December 2015	Lin et al.
2016/0077375	March 2016	Lin
2016/0103380	April 2016	Kayal et al.
2016/0140910	May 2016	Amundson
2016/0178763	June 2016	Okada
2016/0178890	June 2016	Massard
2016/0180777	June 2016	Lin et al.
2016/0312165	October 2016	Lowe, Jr. et al.
2017/0236474	August 2017	Xu
2018/0110975	April 2018	Ivanhoff et al.
2018/0271799	September 2018	Liu et al.

Foreign Patent Documents


105665043	Jun 2016	CN
H06186575	Jul 1994	JP
2008145998	Jun 2008	JP
2013076729	Apr 2013	JP
2013076739	Apr 2013	JP
20070041934	Apr 2007	KR
200916823	Apr 2009	TW
1999067678	Dec 1999	WO
2000005704	Feb 2000	WO
2000036560	Jun 2000	WO
2000038000	Jun 2000	WO

Other References

Korean Intellectual Property Office, PCT/US2019/051379, International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Jan. 3, 2020. cited by applicant .
Panchagnula, R. et al., "Transdermal delivery of naloxone: skin permeation, pharmacokinetic, irritancy and stability studies", International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 293(1-2), pp. 213-223, Apr. 11, 2005. cited by applicant .
Nisar, A. et al., "MEMS-based micropumps in drug delivery and biomedical applications", Sensors and Actuators B Chemical, vol. 130, Issue 2, pp. 917-942, Mar. 28, 2008. cited by applicant .
Fouillet, Y. et al., "EWOD Digital Microfluidics for Lab on a Chip", International Conference on Nanochannels, Microchannels, and Minichannels, Paper No. ICNMM2006-96020, pp. 1255-1264, (Sep. 2008). cited by applicant .
Korean Intellectual Property Office, PCT/US2019/056173, International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Jan. 31, 2020. cited by applicant .
Abdelgawad, Mohamed et al., "The Digital Revolution: A New Paradigm for Microfluidics", Advanced Materials, vol. 21, pp. 920-925,(2009). Jan. 1, 2009. cited by applicant .
Zhao, Ya-Pu et al., "Fundamentals and Applications of Electrowetting: A Critical Review", Rev. Adhesion Adhesives, vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 114-174 (2013) Feb. 1, 2013. cited by applicant .
Kalsi, S. et al., "Rapid and sensitive detection of antibiotic resistance on a programmable digital microfluidic platform", Lab on a Chip, Issue No. 14 (2015) Jun. 18, 2015. cited by applicant .
Choi, Kihwan et al., "Digital Microfluidics", Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 5:413-40 (2012). Apr. 9, 2012. cited by applicant .
Dong, Tao et al., "Capacitance Variation Induced by Microfluidic Two-Phase Flow across Insulated Interdigital Electrodes in Lab-On-Chip Devices", Sensors, 15, pp. 2694-2708 (2015) Jan. 20, 2015. cited by applicant .
Geronimo, G. De et al., "Front-end electronics for imaging detectors", Nuclear Instrumentsand Methods in Physics Research A, 471 pp. 192-199, (2001). Jan. 1, 2001. cited by applicant .
Korean International Patent Office, PCT/US2018/056037, International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Feb. 3, 2019. cited by applicant.

Primary Examiner: Pham; Long D
Attorney, Agent or Firm: McCarter & English, LLP Burns; David R. Bennett; Coalton Sundiata

Parent Case Text

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/732,421, filed Sep. 17, 2018. All references, patents, and patent applications disclosed herein are incorporated by reference in their entireties.

Claims

The invention claimed is:

1. A microfluidic device comprising: a pixel electrode backplane defining a plurality of hexagonal cells comprising: a plurality of scan lines; a plurality of gate lines; a plurality of storage capacitors having a capacitance greater than 0.5 pF; a plurality of thin film transistors; and a plurality of hexagonal propulsion electrodes having a dielectric coating over the plurality of hexagonal propulsion electrodes and a first hydrophobic layer disposed on the dielectric coating, the hexagonal propulsion electrodes being arranged in a honeycomb structure, and each hexagonal propulsion electrode being operatively coupled to a storage capacitor and a thin film transistor, wherein the voltage potential of each hexagonal propulsion electrode is controllable with only one scan line and only one gate line; a light-transmissive electrode having a second hydrophobic layer disposed on the light-transmissive electrode; an oil layer in contact with the first hydrophobic layer and the second hydrophobic layer; and a spacer disposed between the pixel electrode backplane and the light-transmissive electrode, wherein the microfluidic device is configured to move aqueous droplets distributed in the oil layer between three or more of the plurality of hexagonal cells.

2. The microfluidic device of claim 1, wherein the plurality of scan lines is coupled to a scan controller, and the plurality of gate lines is coupled to a gate controller.

3. The microfluidic device of claim 2, wherein the pixel electrode backplane is substantially rectangular in shape, and the scan controller is disposed along a first edge of the pixel electrode backplane and the gate controller is disposed along a second edge of the pixel electrode backplane.

4. The microfluidic device of claim 1, wherein the gate lines are routed parallel to the edges of the hexagonal propulsion electrodes.

5. The microfluidic device of claim 4, wherein the scan lines are routed perpendicular to the gate lines.

6. A microfluidic device comprising: a pixel electrode backplane defining a plurality of triangular cells comprising: a plurality of scan lines; a plurality of gate lines; a plurality of storage capacitors having a capacitance greater than 0.5 pF; a plurality of thin film transistors; and a plurality of triangular propulsion electrodes having a dielectric coating over the plurality of triangular propulsion electrodes and a first hydrophobic layer disposed on the dielectric coating, each triangular propulsion electrode being operatively coupled to a storage capacitor and a thin film transistor, wherein four triangular propulsion electrodes are arranged as a square and the voltage potential of each triangular propulsion electrode is controllable with only one scan line and only one gate line; a light-transmissive electrode having a second hydrophobic layer disposed on the light-transmissive electrode; an oil layer in contact with the first hydrophobic layer and the second hydrophobic layer; and a spacer disposed between the pixel electrode backplane and the light-transmissive electrode, wherein the microfluidic device is configured to move aqueous droplets distributed in the oil layer between three or more of the plurality of triangular cells.

7. The microfluidic device of claim 6 wherein the plurality of scan lines is coupled to a scan controller, and the plurality of gate lines is coupled to a gate controller.

8. The microfluidic device of claim 7, wherein the pixel electrode backplane is substantially rectangular in shape, and the scan controller is disposed along a first edge of the pixel electrode backplane and the gate controller is disposed along a second edge of the pixel electrode backplane.

9. The microfluidic device of claim 6, wherein the gate lines are routed parallel to the edges of the triangular electrodes.

10. The microfluidic device of claim 9, wherein the scan lines are routed perpendicular to the gate lines.

11. The microfluidic device of claim 6, wherein the scan lines are routed parallel to the edges of the triangular propulsion electrodes.

Description

BACKGROUND OF INVENTION

The present invention relates to backplanes for electro-optic displays. More specifically, it is related to non-traditional pixel shapes, such as hexagonal or triangular. Many displays (LCD and electrophoretic) use arrays of electrodes to present pixels of various colorations that are perceived by a viewer as an image. Such pixel arrays traditionally use rectangular or square electrodes, sometimes with edge structures. In this case, each electrode has four nearest neighbor electrodes joined by an edge. Because of the array structure, the pixels can be quickly and individually addressed using scan and gate lines, along with coordinated controllers. Similar structures can be used for non-display purposes, such as particle sensing and electrowetting on dielectric (EWoD).

The term "electro-optic" as applied to a material or a display, is used herein in its conventional meaning in the imaging art to refer to a material having first and second display states differing in at least one optical property, the material being changed from its first to its second display state by application of an electric field to the material. Although the optical property is typically color perceptible to the human eye, it may be another optical property, such as optical transmission, reflectance, luminescence or, in the case of displays intended for machine reading, pseudo-color in the sense of a change in reflectance of electromagnetic wavelengths outside the visible range. While this application refers to devices as electro-optic devices, generally, it is to be understood that the same structure may be used for a non-optical, i.e., non-display application, such as particle sensing or electrowetting on dielectric (EWoD).

The term "gray state" is used herein in its conventional meaning in the imaging art to refer to a state intermediate two extreme optical states of a pixel, and does not necessarily imply a black-white transition between these two extreme states. For example, several of the E Ink patents and published applications referred to below describe electrophoretic displays in which the extreme states are white and deep blue, so that an intermediate "gray state" would actually be pale blue. Indeed, as already mentioned, the change in optical state may not be a color change at all. The terms "black" and "white" may be used hereinafter to refer to the two extreme optical states of a display, and should be understood as normally including extreme optical states which are not strictly black and white, for example the aforementioned white and dark blue states. The term "monochrome" may be used hereinafter to denote a drive scheme that only drives pixels to their two extreme optical states with no intervening gray states.

The terms "bistable" and "bistability" are used herein in their conventional meaning in the art to refer to displays comprising display elements having first and second display states differing in at least one optical property, and such that after any given element has been driven, by means of an addressing pulse of finite duration, to assume either its first or second display state, after the addressing pulse has terminated, that state will persist for at least several times, for example at least four times, the minimum duration of the addressing pulse required to change the state of the display element. It is shown in published US Patent Application No. 2002/0180687 (see also the corresponding International Application Publication No. WO 02/079869) that some particle-based electrophoretic displays capable of gray scale are stable not only in their extreme black and white states but also in their intermediate gray states, and the same is true of some other types of electro-optic displays. This type of display is properly called "multi-stable" rather than bistable, although for convenience the term "bistable" may be used herein to cover both bistable and multi-stable displays.

The term "impulse" is used herein in its conventional meaning of the integral of voltage with respect to time. However, some bistable electro-optic media act as charge transducers and with such media an alternative definition of impulse, namely the integral of current over time (which is equal to the total charge applied) may be used. The appropriate definition of impulse should be used, depending on whether the medium acts as a voltage-time impulse transducer or a charge impulse transducer.

Numerous patents and applications assigned to or in the names of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and E Ink Corporation have recently been published describing encapsulated electrophoretic media. Such encapsulated media comprise numerous small capsules, each of which itself comprises an internal phase containing electrophoretically-mobile particles suspended in a liquid suspension medium, and a capsule wall surrounding the internal phase. Typically, the capsules are themselves held within a polymeric binder to form a coherent layer positioned between two electrodes. The technologies described in these patents and applications include: (a) Electrophoretic particles, fluids and fluid additives; see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,002,728 and 7,679,814; (b) Capsules, binders and encapsulation processes; see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,922,276 and 7,411,719; (c) Films and sub-assemblies containing electro-optic materials; see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,982,178 and 7,839,564; (d) Backplanes, adhesive layers and other auxiliary layers and methods used in displays; see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. D485,294; 6,124,851; 6,130,773; 6,177,921; 6,232,950; 6,252,564; 6,312,304; 6,312,971; 6,376,828; 6,392,786; 6,413,790; 6,422,687; 6,445,374; 6,480,182; 6,498,114; 6,506,438; 6,518,949; 6,521,489; 6,535,197; 6,545,291; 6,639,578; 6,657,772; 6,664,944; 6,680,725; 6,683,333; 6,724,519; 6,750,473; 6,816,147; 6,819,471; 6,825,068; 6,831,769; 6,842,167; 6,842,279; 6,842,657; 6,865,010; 6,967,640; 6,980,196; 7,012,735; 7,030,412; 7,075,703; 7,106,296; 7,110,163; 7,116,318; 7,148,128; 7,167,155; 7,173,752; 7,176,880; 7,190,008; 7,206,119; 7,223,672; 7,230,751; 7,256,766; 7,259,744; 7,280,094; 7,327,511; 7,349,148; 7,352,353; 7,365,394; 7,365,733; 7,382,363; 7,388,572; 7,442,587; 7,492,497; 7,535,624; 7,551,346; 7,554,712; 7,583,427; 7,598,173; 7,605,799; 7,636,191; 7,649,674; 7,667,886; 7,672,040; 7,688,497; 7,733,335; 7,785,988; 7,843,626; 7,859,637; 7,893,435; 7,898,717; 7,957,053; 7,986,450; 8,009,344; 8,027,081; 8,049,947; 8,077,141; 8,089,453; 8,208,193; 8,373,211; 8,389,381; 8,498,042; 8,610,988; 8,728,266; 8,754,859; 8,830,560; 8,891,155; 8,969,886; 9,152,003; and 9,152,004; and U.S. Patent Applications Publication Nos. 2002/0060321; 2004/0105036; 2005/0122306; 2005/0122563; 2007/0052757; 2007/0097489; 2007/0109219; 2009/0122389; 2009/0315044; 2011/0026101; 2011/0140744; 2011/0187683; 2011/0187689; 2011/0292319; 2013/0278900; 2014/0078024; 2014/0139501; 2014/0300837; 2015/0171112; 2015/0205178; 2015/0226986; 2015/0227018; 2015/0228666; and 2015/0261057; and International Application Publication No. WO 00/38000; European Patents Nos. 1,099,207 B1 and 1,145,072 B1; (e) Color formation and color adjustment; see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 7,075,502 and 7,839,564; (f) Methods for driving displays; see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,930,026; 6,445,489; 6,504,524; 6,512,354; 6,531,997; 6,753,999; 6,825,970; 6,900,851; 6,995,550; 7,012,600; 7,023,420; 7,034,783; 7,116,466; 7,119,772; 7,193,625; 7,202,847; 7,259,744; 7,304,787; 7,312,794; 7,327,511; 7,453,445; 7,492,339; 7,528,822; 7,545,358; 7,583,251; 7,602,374; 7,612,760; 7,679,599; 7,688,297; 7,729,039; 7,733,311; 7,733,335; 7,787,169; 7,952,557; 7,956,841; 7,999,787; 8,077,141; 8,125,501; 8,139,050; 8,174,490; 8,289,250; 8,300,006; 8,305,341; 8,314,784; 8,373,649; 8,384,658; 8,558,783; 8,558,785; 8,593,396; and 8,928,562; and U.S. Patent Applications Publication Nos. 2003/0102858; 2005/0253777; 2007/0091418; 2007/0103427; 2008/0024429; 2008/0024482; 2008/0136774; 2008/0291129; 2009/0174651; 2009/0179923; 2009/0195568; 2009/0322721; 2010/0220121; 2010/0265561; 2011/0193840; 2011/0193841; 2011/0199671; 2011/0285754; 2013/0063333; 2013/0194250; 2013/0321278; 2014/0009817; 2014/0085350; 2014/0240373; 2014/0253425; 2014/0292830; 2014/0333685; 2015/0070744; 2015/0109283; 2015/0213765; 2015/0221257; and 2015/0262255; (g) Applications of displays; see for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,118,426; 6,473,072; 6,704,133; 6,710,540; 6,738,050; 6,825,829; 7,030,854; 7,119,759; 7,312,784; and 8,009,348; 7,705,824; 8,064,962; and 8,553,012; and U.S. Patent Applications Publication Nos. 2002/0090980; 2004/0119681; and 2007/0285385; and International Application Publication No. WO 00/36560; and (h) Non-electrophoretic displays, as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,241,921; 6,950,220; 7,420,549; 8,319,759; and 8,994,705 and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2012/0293858.

The present invention provides efficient designs for pixel arrays with non-traditional shapes that can employ traditional scan and gate lines, controllers, shift registers, etc.

SUMMARY OF INVENTION

The invention provides backplanes having an array of hexagonal electrodes or an array of triangular electrodes. Because the backplane designs route the gate lines along the periphery of the electrodes there is less cross talk with the surface of the electrode. These designs simplify construction and control of the electrodes and improve the regularity of the electric field above the electrode. Such electrode designs may be particularly useful in particle sensing and EWoD applications, however, there is no reason that the designs cannot be used in a more traditional display, such as an LCD display or an electrophoretic display (EPD).

A benefit of the backplane electrode structures disclosed is that they are easily coupled to standard controllers and can result in simple pinouts that are plug-and-play with existing ecosystems. This reduces the complexity of the substrates as well as interfaces with printed circuit boards, thereby reducing costs.

In one aspect, the invention provides a pixel electrode backplane including a plurality of scan lines, a plurality of gate lines, a plurality of storage capacitors, a plurality of thin film transistors, and a plurality of hexagonal electrodes. Typically, the storage capacitors are larger than 0.5 pF. In the invention, the hexagonal electrodes are arranged in a honeycomb structure, and the voltage potential of each hexagonal electrode is controllable with only one scan line and only one gate line. In some embodiments, the plurality of scan lines is coupled to a scan controller and the plurality of gate lines is coupled to a gate controller. In some embodiments, the gate lines are routed parallel to the edges of the hexagonal electrodes.

In another aspect, the invention provides a pixel electrode backplane including a plurality of scan lines, a plurality of gate lines, a plurality of storage capacitors, a plurality of thin film transistors, and a plurality of triangular electrodes. Typically, the storage capacitors are larger than 0.5 pF. In the invention, two triangular electrodes or four triangular electrodes are arranged as a square and the voltage potential of each triangular electrode is controllable with only one scan line and only one gate line. In some embodiments, the plurality of scan lines is coupled to a scan controller and the plurality of gate lines is coupled to a gate controller. In some embodiments, the gate lines are routed parallel to the edges of the triangular electrodes. In some embodiments, the scan lines are routed parallel to the edges of the triangular electrodes.

The functionality of the backplane electrodes can be expanded by disposing a dielectric layer over the pixel electrodes, as well as a hydrophobic layer over the dielectric layer. Such coated pixel electrode backplanes can be incorporated into microfluidic devices by adding a light-transmissive electrode and a spacer disposed between the pixel electrode backplane and the light-transmissive electrode.

In other embodiments, the backplane electrodes can be the basis for controlling an electrophoretic display (EPD) by adding a light-transmissive electrode and disposing an electrophoretic medium (typically charged particles in a non-polar solvent) between the backplane electrodes and the light-transmissive electrode.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows a plurality of hexagonal electrodes arranged in a honeycomb. The invention provides for easy fabrication of such an array while providing simple individual control of each hexagonal pixel with a scan line and a gate line.

FIG. 2 illustrates the driving details the hexagonal array, including gate lines (G.sub.n), scan lines (S.sub.n), thin film transistors, and storage capacitors.

FIG. 3 illustrates an embodiment of the pixel electronics for a hexagonal electrode;

FIGS. 4A and 4B illustrate an embodiment of a backplane using the hexagonal electrode architecture of the invention. The embodiment of FIG. 4A includes 217.times.164=35,588 pixel electrodes, a gate controller with 825 channels output mode, and a data controller with 800 channels output mode.

FIG. 5 shows a first embodiment of an array of triangular electrodes where electrodes A and B form a square.

FIG. 6 shows a second embodiment of an array of triangular electrodes where electrodes A, B, C, and D form a square.

FIGS. 7A and 7B illustrate an embodiment of a backplane using the triangular electrode architecture of the invention. The embodiment of FIG. 7A includes 374.times.163=60,962 pixel electrodes, a gate controller with 825 channels output mode, and a data controller with 800 channels output mode.

FIG. 8 illustrates an embodiment of a backplane using the triangular electrode architecture of the invention.

FIG. 9 depicts the movement of an aqueous-phase droplet between adjacent electrodes by providing differing charge states on adjacent electrodes. In FIG. 9, a negative charge is induced in a liquid at the liquid/dielectric interface above a (lower) electrode receiving an AC signal, while a positive charge is induced when negative voltage is applied to an opposing (upper) electrode. (This figure shows instant that the leftmost electrode is positively charged during the AC cycle.) As shown in FIG. 9, a pixel always has opposite charge to the induced charge at the droplet interface.

FIG. 10 shows a TFT architecture for a plurality of propulsion electrodes of an EWoD device of the invention.

FIG. 11 is a general depiction of an electrophoretic medium, suitable for use with a backplane of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The invention provides for arrays of hexagonal and triangular electrodes that individually addressable with conventional scan/gate driving. Such arrays may be useful in creating displays, such as liquid crystal displays (LCD) or electrophoretic displays (EPD). Such arrays may also be useful in non-display applications, such as particle (e.g., photon) sensors or electrowetting on dielectric (EWoD), which may be used for microfluidic applications such as lab-on-a chip assays.

Creating digital pictures requires the ability to address individual spatial elements (pixels) quickly. In some instances, each pixel is its own color source (e.g., full color electrophoretic displays described in U.S. Pat. No. 9,921,451), in other instances, several sub-pixels act in concert to give the illusion of a range of colors for the pixel. While it is possible to wire each pixel to control the voltage state individually, it is more common to provide an array of non-linear elements, such as transistors or diodes, with at least one non-linear element associated with each pixel (or sub-pixel), to produce an "active matrix" display. An addressing or pixel electrode, which addresses one pixel, is connected to an appropriate voltage source through the associated non-linear element. Typically, when the non-linear element is a transistor, the pixel electrode is connected to the drain of the transistor, and this arrangement will be assumed in the following description, although it is essentially arbitrary and the pixel electrode could be connected to the source of the transistor. Conventionally, in high-resolution arrays, the pixels are arranged in a two-dimensional array of rows and columns, such that any specific pixel is uniquely defined by the intersection of one specified row and one specified column. The sources of all the transistors in each column are connected to a single column electrode, while the gates of all the transistors in each row are connected to a single row electrode; again, the assignment of sources to rows and gates to columns is conventional but essentially arbitrary, and could be reversed if desired. The row electrodes are connected to a row driver, which essentially ensures that at any given moment only one row is selected, i.e., that there is applied to the selected row electrode a voltage such as to ensure that all the transistors in the selected row are conductive, while there is applied to all other rows a voltage such as to ensure that all the transistors in these non-selected rows remain non-conductive. The column electrodes are connected to column drivers, which place upon the various column electrodes voltages selected to drive the pixels in the selected row to their desired optical states. (The aforementioned voltages are relative to a common front electrode that is conventionally provided on the opposed side of the electro-optic medium from the non-linear array and extends across the whole display.) After a pre-selected interval known as the "line address time" the selected row is deselected, the next row is selected, and the voltages on the column drivers are changed to that the next line of the display is written. This process is repeated so that the entire display is written in a row-by-row manner. (Throughout this document, the gate lines are horizontal and the scan lines are vertical.) Because driving electronics are typically arranged as a matrix, the pixel electrodes coupled to the driving electronics are commonly square or rectangular and arranged in a rectangular array in order to maximize the area covered by the electrodes.

Processes for manufacturing active matrix displays are well established. Thin-film transistors, for example, can be fabricated using various deposition and photolithography techniques. A transistor includes a gate electrode, an insulating dielectric layer, a semiconductor layer and source and drain electrodes. Application of a voltage to the gate electrode provides an electric field across the dielectric layer, which dramatically increases the source-to-drain conductivity of the semiconductor layer. This change permits electrical conduction between the source and the drain electrodes. Typically, the gate electrode, the source electrode, and the drain electrode are patterned. In general, the semiconductor layer is also patterned in order to minimize stray conduction (i.e., cross-talk) between neighboring circuit elements.

Liquid crystal displays commonly employ amorphous silicon ("a-Si"), thin-film transistors ("TFTs") as switching devices for display pixels. Such TFTs typically have a bottom-gate configuration. Within one pixel, a thin film capacitor typically holds a charge transferred by the switching TFT. Electrophoretic displays can use similar TFTs with capacitors, although the function of the capacitors differs somewhat from those in liquid crystal displays; see the aforementioned copending application Ser. No. 09/565,413, and Publications 2002/0106847 and 2002/0060321. Thin film transistors can be fabricated to provide high performance. Fabrication processes, however, can result in significant cost.

In TFT addressing arrays, pixel electrodes are charged via the TFTs during a line address time. During the line address time, a TFT is switched to a conducting state by changing an applied gate voltage. For example, for an n-type TFT, a gate voltage is switched to a "high" state to switch the TFT into a conducting state.

It should be appreciated that the backplanes described herein may be extended to an electro-optic display comprising a layer of electro-optic medium disposed on the backplane and covering the pixel electrode. Such an electro-optic display may use any of the types of electro-optic medium previously discussed; for example, the electro-optic medium may be a liquid crystal, a rotating bichromal member or electrochromic medium, or an electrophoretic medium, preferably an encapsulated electrophoretic medium. In some embodiments, when an electrophoretic medium is utilized, a plurality of charged particles can move through a suspending fluid under the influence of an electric field. Such electrophoretic displays can have attributes of good brightness and contrast, wide viewing angles, state bistability, and low power consumption when compared with liquid crystal displays.

The backplanes described herein may also be used for electrowetting on dielectric (EWoD). An EWoD device typically includes a cell filled with an oil and at least one aqueous droplet. The cell gap is typically in the range 50 to 200 .mu.m, but the gap can be larger. In a basic configuration, a plurality of propulsion electrodes (pixels) are disposed on one substrate and a singular top electrode is disposed on the opposing surface. The cell additionally includes hydrophobic coatings on the surfaces contacting the oil layer, as well as a dielectric layer between the propulsion electrodes and the hydrophobic coating. (The upper substrate may also include a dielectric layer). The hydrophobic layer prevents the droplet from wetting the surface. When no voltage differential is applied between adjacent electrodes, the droplet will maintain a spheroidal shape to minimize contact with the hydrophobic surfaces (oil and hydrophobic layer). Because the droplets do not wet the surface, they are less likely to contaminate the surface or interact with other droplets except when that behavior is desired. By individually addressing the electrodes in the active matrix, it is possible to move droplets of water, split the droplets, and merge droplets. Because the water droplets are compatible with biological molecules, it is possible to perform bioassays on minute quantities of samples. Conventional rectangular arrays can limit functionality in EWoD devices, because the only options are up/down/left/right whereas a hexagonal electrode of the invention has six nearest neighbor electrodes for more directions of movement and forces can be applied at 60.degree., 120.degree. and linearly.

FIG. 1 illustrates a top view of an array of hexagonal electrodes 100. FIG. 1 is arranged as a traditional honeycomb; however, the other repeating structures are possible. Additionally, each hexagon electrode need not be regular in that each side and each angle are the same.

FIG. 2 is an overhead view of the driving electronics as arranged for a hexagonal array of the invention. As shown in FIG. 2, each hexagonal electrode includes a thin-film transistor (TFT) 205 and a storage capacitor 210. Gate lines 220 and scan lines 225, as discussed above control the TFT 205. Notably, in the arrangement of the invention, the gate lines travel parallel to the perimeter of the hexagonal electrodes. This allows each hexagonal electrode to be addressed by a gate line and a scan line, as would typically be arranged in a backplane, and controlled by a gate controller and a scan controller (see FIG. 4A). Because the gate lines are running along the perimeter of the electrodes (and not under), the electric field on the electrode is more consistent across the surface of the electrode. This feature is especially useful when the hexagonal electrodes are larger (i.e., on the order of 500 .mu.m) and field inconsistencies can affect the performance of the device (i.e., stopping a droplet, or showing a wrong color).

The layout of the controller for the hexagonal array is shown in FIGS. 4A and 4B, including gate and scan controllers. As illustrated in FIG. 4A, more than 30,000 electrodes can be arrayed on a 5 cm.times.5 cm backplane using commercially available scan and gate controllers. [See for example, scan and gate controllers from MK electric (Taipei, Taiwan).] Using hexagonal electrodes of approximately 235 .mu.m is easily accomplished with a separation between hexagonal electrodes of around 5 .mu.m. Of course, this layout could be made larger or smaller, for example, the backplane could include between 5,000 and 500,000 electrodes. Additionally, the hexagonal electrodes can be larger or smaller, i.e., between 50 .mu.m and 1 mm. The individual TFTs can be controlled with gate lines 420 and scan lines 425 as shown in FIG. 4B.

FIGS. 5 and 6 illustrate top views of arrays of triangular electrodes. FIG. 5 shows a first embodiment of triangular electrodes where two electrodes "A" and "B" create a square feature. FIG. 6 shows a second embodiment of triangular electrodes where four electrodes "A", "B", "C", and "D" create a square feature. It is possible that other configurations of triangular electrodes may be made that create a square. Like the hexagonal arrays described above, the arrays of FIGS. 5 and 6 can be used in both display and non-display applications.

FIGS. 7A and 7B show an overhead view of the driving electronics as arranged for a hexagonal array of the invention. As shown in FIG. 7B, each hexagonal electrode includes a TFT 705 and a storage capacitor 710. Gate lines 720 and scan lines 725, as discussed above control the TFT 705. Notably, in the arrangement of the invention, the gate and scan lines travel parallel to the perimeter of the triangular electrodes. This allows each triangular electrode to be addressed by a gate line and a scan line, as would typically be arranged in a backplane, and controlled by a gate controller and a scan controller. Because the gate and scan lines are running along the perimeter of the electrodes (and not under), the electric field on the electrode is more consistent across the surface of the electrode. This feature is especially useful when the triangular electrodes are larger (i.e., on the order of 500 .mu.m) and field inconsistencies can affect the performance of the device (i.e., stopping a droplet, or showing a wrong color).

The layout of the controller for the triangular array is also shown in FIG. 7A, including gate and scan controllers. As illustrated in FIG. 7A, more than 60,000 electrodes can be arrayed on a 5 cm.times.5 cm backplane using commercially available scan and gate controllers. Using triangular electrodes of approximately 150 .mu.m is easily accomplished with a separation between triangular electrodes of around 5 .mu.m. Of course, this layout could be made larger or smaller, for example, the backplane could include between 5,000 and 500,000 electrodes. Additionally, the triangular electrodes can be larger or smaller, i.e., between 50 .mu.m and 1 mm. An alternative arrangement of triangular electrodes is shown in FIG. 8, where the gate lines 820 and scan lines 825 are perpendicular.

Of course the arrangements of the electrodes in the figures is exemplary, and the geometrical dimensions of the pixel electrode and/or the gate line and/or scan lines can be modified for special applications or as the number of pixels is limited by available scan controllers or backplane size. For example, the size of the pixel electrode may be reduced to enlarge the gap space between the electrode and the data line. In some other embodiments, the electrical properties of the material between the pixel electrode and the data line may be altered to reduce crosstalk. For example, one may increase the thickness of the insulating thin film between the pixel electrode and its neighboring data lines to reduce capacitive coupling.

In some embodiments, backplanes of the invention can be incorporated into an electrowetting on dielectric (EWoD) device including a backplane of the invention coupled to a light-transmissive electrode and separated by a spacer. The fundamental operation of an EWoD device is illustrated in the sectional image of FIG. 9. The EWoD 900 includes a cell filled with an oil 902 and at least one aqueous droplet 904. The cell gap is defined by a spacer (not shown) but typically, in the range 50 to 200 .mu.m, however the gap can be larger. In a basic configuration, as shown in FIG. 9, a plurality of propulsion electrodes 905 are disposed on one substrate and a singular light-transmissive top electrode 906 is disposed on the opposing surface. The cell additionally includes hydrophobic coatings 907 on the surfaces contacting the oil layer, as well as a dielectric layer 908 between the propulsion electrodes 905 and the hydrophobic coating 907. (The upper substrate may also include a dielectric layer, but it is not shown in FIG. 9). The hydrophobic layer prevents the droplet from wetting the surface. When no voltage differential is applied between adjacent electrodes, the droplet will maintain a spheroidal shape to minimize contact with the hydrophobic surfaces (oil and hydrophobic layer). Because the droplets do not wet the surface, they are less likely to contaminate the surface or interact with other droplets except when that behavior is desired.

The dielectric 908 must be thin enough and have a dielectric constant compatible with low voltage AC driving, such as available from conventional image controllers for LCD displays. For example, the dielectric layer may comprise a layer of approximately 20-40 nm SiO.sub.2 topped over-coated with 200-400 nm plasma-deposited silicon nitride. Alternatively, the dielectric may comprise atomic-layer-deposited Al.sub.2O.sub.3 between 2 and 100 nm thick, preferably between 20 and 60 nm thick. The TFT is constructed by creating alternating layers of differently-doped a-Si structures along with various electrode lines, with methods know to those of skill in the art. The hydrophobic layer 907 can be constructed from materials such as Teflon.RTM. AF (Sigma-Aldrich, Milwaukee, Wis.) and FlurorPel.TM. coatings from Cytonix (Beltsville, Md.), which can be spin coated over the dielectric layer 908.

While it is possible to have a single layer for both the dielectric and hydrophobic functions, such layers typically require thick inorganic layers (to prevent pinholes) with resulting low dielectric constants, thereby requiring more than 100V for droplet movement. To achieve low voltage actuation, it is better to have a thin inorganic layer for high capacitance and to be pinhole free, topped by a thin organic hydrophobic layer. With this combination, it is possible to have electrowetting operation with voltages in the range +/-10 to +/-50V, which is in the range that can be supplied by conventional TFT arrays.

When a voltage differential is applied between adjacent electrodes, the voltage on one electrode attracts opposite charges in the droplet at the dielectric-to-droplet interface, and the droplet moves toward this electrode, as illustrated in FIG. 2. The voltages needed for acceptable droplet propulsion depend on the properties of the dielectric and hydrophobic layers. AC driving is used to reduce degradation of the droplets, dielectrics, and electrodes by various electrochemistries. Operational frequencies for EWoD can be in the range 100 Hz to 1 MHz, but lower frequencies of 1 kHz or lower are preferred for use with TFTs that have limited speed of operation.

As shown in FIG. 9, the top electrode 906 is a single conducting layer normally set to zero volts or a common voltage value (VCOM) to take into account offset voltages on the propulsion electrodes 905 due to capacitive kickback from the TFTs that are used to switch the voltage on the electrodes (see FIG. 10). The top electrode can also have a square wave applied to increase the voltage across the liquid. Such an arrangement allows lower propulsion voltages to be used for the TFT connected propulsion electrodes 905 because the top plate voltage 906 is additional to the voltage supplied by the TFT.

As shown in FIG. 10, an active matrix of propulsion electrodes (hexagonal or trigonal or some other shape) can be arranged to be driven with data and gate (select) lines much like an active matrix in a liquid crystal display (LCD). However, unlike an LCD, storage capacitors of the invention typically have a much higher capacitance, as required for electrophoretic displays and electrowetting on dielectric devices. For example, each storage capacitor in an array of backplane electrodes is typically greater than 0.1 pF (picoFarad), e.g., greater than 0.5 pF, e.g., greater than 1 pF, e.g., greater than 2 pF, e.g., greater than 5 pF, e.g., greater than 10 pF, e.g., greater than 50 pF, e.g., greater than 100 pF.

In EWoD applications, the gate (select) lines are scanned for line-at-a time addressing, while the data lines carry the voltage to be transferred to propulsion electrodes for electrowetting operation. If no movement is needed, or if a droplet is meant to move away from a propulsion electrode, then 0V will be applied to that (non-target) propulsion electrode. If a droplet is meant to move toward a propulsion electrode, an AC voltage will be applied to that (target) propulsion electrode.

An exemplary electrophoretic display (EPD) incorporating a pixel electrode backplane of the invention is show in FIG. 11. Display 1100 normally comprises a layer of electrophoretic material 1130 and at least two other layers 1110 and 1120 disposed on opposed sides of the electrophoretic material 1130, at least one of these two layers being a light-transmissive electrode layer, e.g., as depicted by layer 1110 in FIG. 11. The light-transmissive electrode 1110 may be a transparent conductor, such as Indium Tin Oxide (ITO) (which in some cases may be deposited onto a transparent substrate, such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET)). Such EPDs also include, as illustrated in FIG. 11, a backplane 1150, comprising a plurality of driving electrodes 1153 and a substrate layer 1157. The layer of electrophoretic material 1130 may include microcapsules 1133, holding electrophoretic pigment particles 1135 and 1137 and a solvent, with the microcapsules 1133 dispersed in a polymeric binder 1139. Nonetheless, it is understood that the electrophoretic medium (particles 1135 and 1137 and solvent) may be enclosed in microcells (microcups) or distributed in a polymer without a surrounding microcapsule (e.g., PDEPID design described above). Typically, the pigment particles 1137 and 1135 are controlled (displaced) with an electric field produced between the front electrode 1110 and the pixel electrodes 1153. In many conventional EPDs, the electrical driving waveforms are transmitted to the pixel electrodes 1153 via conductive traces (not shown) that are coupled to thin-film transistors (TFTs) that allow the pixel electrodes to be addressed in a row-column addressing scheme. In some embodiments, the front electrode 1110 is merely grounded and the image driven by providing positive and negative potentials to the pixel electrodes 1153, which are individually addressable. In other embodiments, a potential may also be applied to the front electrode 1110 to provide a greater variation in the fields that can be provided between the front electrode and the pixel electrodes 1153.

From the foregoing, it will be seen that the present invention can provide a backplane with arrays of hexagonal or triangular electrodes. It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that numerous changes and modifications can be made to the specific embodiments of the invention described above without departing from the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the whole of the foregoing description is to be interpreted in an illustrative and not in a limitative sense.

* * * * *