U.S. patent number 10,260,334 [Application Number 15/316,496] was granted by the patent office on 2019-04-16 for gas lift analysis and troubleshooting.
This patent grant is currently assigned to Welltracer Technology, LLC. The grantee listed for this patent is WellTracer Technology, LLC. Invention is credited to Dan Dees, John Lund, Larry Peacock.
View All Diagrams
United States Patent |
10,260,334 |
Peacock , et al. |
April 16, 2019 |
Gas lift analysis and troubleshooting
Abstract
Methods and computer program products for evaluating the
performance of a gas lift well. The method includes measuring key
gas lift well parameter data and concentration of a tracer present
in a substance retrieved from the gas lift well which was injected
into the annulus formed between a well casing and a production
tubing of the gas lift well. The actual travel time of the tracer
which corresponds to a time duration required for injected tracer
and lift gas to travel from the injection point, down the annulus,
through one or more points of entry of the lift gas into the
production tubing is then determined based on a deviation in the
concentration of the tracer measured by accounting for variations
in a fractal obtained by plotting multiple key well parameter data
and a concentration of the tracer in a multi-dimensional time
dependent plot.
Inventors: |
Peacock; Larry (Katy, TX),
Dees; Dan (Katy, TX), Lund; John (Katy, TX) |
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
WellTracer Technology, LLC |
Katy |
TX |
US |
|
|
Assignee: |
Welltracer Technology, LLC
(Katy, TX)
|
Family
ID: |
54833981 |
Appl.
No.: |
15/316,496 |
Filed: |
June 9, 2014 |
PCT
Filed: |
June 09, 2014 |
PCT No.: |
PCT/US2014/041532 |
371(c)(1),(2),(4) Date: |
December 05, 2016 |
PCT
Pub. No.: |
WO2015/191026 |
PCT
Pub. Date: |
December 17, 2015 |
Prior Publication Data
|
|
|
|
Document
Identifier |
Publication Date |
|
US 20170183955 A1 |
Jun 29, 2017 |
|
Current U.S.
Class: |
1/1 |
Current CPC
Class: |
E21B
47/00 (20130101); E21B 49/08 (20130101); E21B
47/008 (20200501); E21B 43/122 (20130101); E21B
47/11 (20200501); E21B 47/07 (20200501); G01M
3/2846 (20130101); E21B 49/087 (20130101); E21B
47/06 (20130101); E21B 43/34 (20130101); E21B
43/123 (20130101) |
Current International
Class: |
E21B
47/10 (20120101); E21B 43/12 (20060101); E21B
47/00 (20120101); E21B 47/06 (20120101); E21B
49/08 (20060101); G01M 3/28 (20060101); E21B
43/34 (20060101) |
References Cited
[Referenced By]
U.S. Patent Documents
Other References
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Dec. 15, 2014
for related PCT patent application No. PCT/US2014/041532. cited by
applicant.
|
Primary Examiner: Bates; Zakiya W
Attorney, Agent or Firm: D'Ambrosio & Menon, PLLC Menon;
Usha
Claims
The invention claimed is:
1. A computer implemented method for evaluating the performance of
a gas lift well, the method comprising: injecting a tracer into an
annulus formed between a well casing and a production tubing of the
gas lift well, the annulus including a lift gas, the gas lift well
including one or more points of communication between the annulus
and the production tubing, wherein each of the one or more points
of communication corresponds to a valve position; measuring, over a
period of time, a concentration of the tracer present in a
substance retrieved from the gas lift well; adjusting the measured
concentration of the tracer upon the condition that a pattern
present in: (1) a plot of a baseline tracer concentration comprises
substantial instability; or (2) a plot of a plurality of collected
real time key well parameter data comprises substantial
instability, wherein each of the key well parameters comprises at
least one of: at least one of: (i) a plurality of pressures in the
production tubing, each of the plurality of pressures corresponding
to one of the plurality of ranges of well depth, (ii) a flow rate
of the lift gas in the production tubing, (iii) a temperature in
the production tubing, (iv) a parameter that represents a
frictional force opposing flow in the production tubing, (v) a
parameter that represents an effect of gravity on flow in the
production tubing, (vi) a ratio of a gaseous phase to a non-gaseous
phase in the substance retrieved from the gas lift well, (vii) a
flow rate of one or more gases present in the substance retrieved
from the gas lift well, (viii) a flow rate of one of more liquids
present in the substance retrieved from the gas lift well, (ix) a
well head pressure, and (x) a separator pressure; and generating
one or more fractals by graphically representing the adjusted
tracer concentration and the collected key well parameter data in a
multi-dimensional time dependent plot for diagnosing an abnormal
condition in the gas lift well, wherein a fractal is a chaotic
pattern that produces irregular shapes and surfaces.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising: determining one or
more actual travel times of the tracer based on a deviation of the
concentration of the tracer measured over the period of time from
the pattern present in a baseline tracer concentration, wherein
each of the one or more actual travel times of the tracer
corresponds to a point of entry of one or more points of entry of
the lift gas into the production tubing; determining one or more
lift gas loss parameters, each of the one or more lift gas
parameters corresponding to a point of entry, each of the one or
more lift gas loss parameters accounting for an effect of entry of
a portion of the tracer into the production tubing at the
corresponding point of entry on the actual travel time of the
tracer that enters the production tubing at each point of entry
located at a depth greater than the corresponding point of entry;
calculating a velocity of the lift gas in the annulus and a
velocity of the lift gas in the production tubing for each of the
plurality of ranges of well depth based on the one or more lift gas
loss parameters; adjusting the calculated velocity at an initial
injection point, wherein adjusting the calculated velocity
comprises applying an injection loss factor to the calculated
velocity to account for non-instantaneous velocity changes; and
applying the adjusted velocity to a subsequent injection point,
wherein the injection loss factor is re-calculated based on
conditions at a subsequent injection point thereby obtaining an
adjusted velocity for a next injection point.
3. The method of claim 2, further comprising: determining the one
or more points of entry of the lift gas into the production tubing
based on: (i) the one or more actual travel times of the tracer,
and (ii) the velocity of the lift gas in the annulus and the
velocity of the lift gas in the production tubing that are
calculated for each of the plurality of ranges of well depth,
wherein one or more of the steps of the method are controlled by at
least one computer processor executing one or more computer program
instructions stored on at least one memory device operatively
coupled to the at least one processor.
4. The method of claim 2, further comprising: calculating a travel
time of the tracer for each of the one or more points of
communication between the annulus and the production tubing based
on the velocity of the lift gas in the annulus and the velocity of
the lift gas in the production tubing that are calculated for each
of the plurality of ranges of well depth.
5. The method of claim 2, further comprising: displaying a
graphical representation on an output device the concentration of
the tracer measured over the period of time, wherein the graphical
representation indicates the travel time of the tracer calculated
for each of the one or more points of communication between the
annulus and the production tubing, and wherein upon the condition
that the graphical representation includes one or more peaks in the
concentration of the tracer measured over the period of time, each
of the one of more peaks corresponding to one of the one or more
actual travel times, one of the one or more points of entry of the
lift gas into the production tubing, and one of the one or more
lift gas loss parameters, the one or more lift gas loss parameters
being determined by: (i) determining an area under each of the one
or more peaks; (ii) summing each area determined for each of the
one or more peaks to obtain a total area; and (iii) determining,
for each of the one or more peaks, a ratio of the area under the
each of the one or more peaks to the total area, the ratio
representing the lift gas loss parameter corresponding to the each
of the one or more peaks.
6. The method of claim 2, further comprising: comparing the one or
more determined points of entry of the lift gas to the one or more
points of communication in order to determine, for each of the one
or more determined points of entry of the lift gas, whether the
point of entry corresponds to a leak of the lift gas into the
production tubing or entry of the lift gas into the production
tubing through a valve.
7. The method of claim 2, further comprising: separating a gaseous
phase from the substance retrieved from the gas lift well; and
measuring, over a period of time, a concentration of the tracer
present in the gaseous phase.
8. The method of claim 2, wherein a velocity of the lift gas in the
annulus for a second range of the plurality of ranges of well depth
is calculated further based on a temperature in the annulus and a
pressure in the annulus that correspond to a first range of the
plurality of ranges of well depth.
9. The method of claim 2, wherein the velocity of the lift gas in
the production tubing is calculated using a dynamic multi-phase
flow pressure simulator, and wherein the performance of the gas
lift well is evaluated by continuously measuring data for each of
the key well parameters based on the dynamic simulator or proven
real time data.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein diagnosing an abnormal condition
in the gas lift well comprises visually inspecting the generated
fractal.
11. The method of claim 1, wherein diagnosing an abnormal condition
in the gas lift well comprises comparing the generated fractal with
a pattern obtained by plotting a plurality of optimal key well
parameter data.
12. The method of claim 1, further comprises alerting a well
operator upon diagnosing an abnormal condition in the gas lift
well.
13. A gas lift well surveillance kit for evaluating the performance
of a gas lift well according to claim 1, wherein the gas lift
surveillance kit comprises: a separator; a tracer measurement
device; a device for sensing and measuring pressure and
temperature; a flow regulation device; a data collection and
storage device; a non-transitory computer-readable medium; at least
one of a power source, a pressure gauge, and tubing for connecting
the gas lift well surveillance kit to the gas lift well, and
wherein at least one of: the tracer measurement device is a
spectrometer, the data collection and storage device is a
datalogger, and the device for sensing pressure and temperature is
a transducer.
14. A gas lift well surveillance kit for evaluating the performance
of a gas lift well according to claim 2, wherein the gas lift
surveillance kit comprises: a separator; a tracer measurement
device; a device for sensing and measuring pressure and
temperature; a flow regulation device; a data collection and
storage device; a non-transitory computer-readable medium; at least
one of a power source, a pressure gauge, and tubing for connecting
the gas lift well surveillance kit to the gas lift well, and
wherein at least one of: the tracer measurement device is a
spectrometer, the data collection and storage device is a
datalogger, and the device for sensing pressure and temperature is
a transducer.
Description
BACKGROUND
Various processes are employed to assist in retrieving oil, water,
or a mixture of various fluids from wells when a lack of sufficient
reservoir pressure limits well production. One such technique,
known as "gas lift," involves injecting a gas into an annulus
formed between the well casing and the production tubing within a
wellbore. In gas lift wells, gas-lift mandrels having gas-lift
valves that are operatively connected thereto are typically
installed in the production tubing of the well. Variation between
tubing and casing pressures may cause a gas-lift valve to open and
close, thereby allowing gas to be injected into the fluid(s) to be
retrieved from the well. The injected gas forms air pockets within
the fluid and assists in lifting the fluid from the subterranean
reservoir and through the wellbore. The invention relates to
methods and systems for evaluating the performance of a gas lift
well. More specifically, the invention relates to methods and
systems for determining points of entry of lift gas into the
production tubing within a gas lift well.
SUMMARY
One or more embodiments of the invention are directed to methods,
systems, and/or computer program products for determining one or
more points of entry of a lift gas from an annulus of a well casing
into the production tubing. The points of entry of the lift gas may
correspond to entry of the lift gas through gas-lift valves or
entry of the lift gas into the production tubing as a result of
leaks in the production tubing.
The embodiments of the present invention provide a gas lift well
surveying method wherein the gas lift well behavior is reproduced
or simulated during its operation. An optimum well operating
envelope may be defined to assist the well operator to take
necessary troubleshooting or corrective action. The
computer-implemented gas lift well surveying method performs a set
of mathematical operation on one or key well parameters for
evaluating the performance of an operational gas lift well. In one
embodiment of the method, an ideal or optimal behavior of the gas
lift well is first graphically reproduced by representing a
plurality of key well parameter data set corresponding to an ideal
gas lift well parameter data set or to an optimally operational gas
lift well in a multidimensional time independent plot. After
plotting of the data set, one or more patterns in the plotted data
are identified. After defining the optimum well operating envelope,
a multidimensional time dependent plot is generated by providing
multiple key well parameter real time data set. The
multidimensional time dependent plot of the real time gas lift well
parameter provides a pattern or a fractal and the fractal lines
represent actual well operating conditions in real time. Therefore,
by inspecting the fractal on a real-time basis, performance of the
gas lift well can be evaluated. The key well parameters can include
one or more of injection rate, casing mechanical layout, injection
pressure, injection temperature, lift gas specific gravity, total
produced liquid rate, water cut, formation gas rate, tubing head
pressure (THP), casing head pressure (CHP), production separator
pressure, production manifold pressure, production temperature and
tracer concentration.
In another embodiment, a method evaluating the performance of a gas
lift well, for example, an unstable well, may involve a transient
analysis. The method involves the transient simulation of the gas
lift well which provides non-instantaneous variation in the key
well parameters. The non-instantaneous key well parameters may be
derived with a dynamic simulator.
The dynamic simulator may be calibrated by one or more real time
key well parameter data to drive steady state and non-steady state
or transient simulation to account for time dependent variations in
one or more key well parameters. The transient data that may be
derived from the dynamic simulator may be demonstrated in a
multi-dimensional time dependent plot to generate a dynamic graph.
The multi-dimensional time dependent plot may specify a relation
between the well data in one set of transient data to well data in
at least one other set of transient data to indicate a
non-instantaneous variation in the gas lift well parameters. The
transient simulation derived from the dynamic simulator can also be
auto tuned by checking the consistency of a first set of simulator
results, for example, current results, against a second set of
simulator results (for example, an earlier version) and against
steady state calculations based on the real time gas lift well
parameter data to ensure an accepted range of variance and
validity. The current results may be recalculated on detecting any
inconsistency. If the current results may be found to be
acceptable, then the dynamic simulator can continue to a next
step.
In one embodiment, an error function may be used to compare the
results of the dynamic simulation with actual or real time data and
to repeat the process until an acceptable match may be found while
the dynamic simulator is operational.
In one embodiment, a method for evaluating the performance of a gas
lift well comprises: injecting a tracer into an annulus formed
between a well casing and a production tubing of the gas lift well,
the annulus including a lift gas, the gas lift well including one
or more points of communication between the annulus and the
production tubing, wherein each of the one or more points of
communication corresponds to a valve position; measuring, over a
period of time, a concentration of the tracer present in a
substance retrieved from the gas lift well; determining one or more
actual travel times of the tracer based on a deviation of the
concentration of the tracer measured over the period of time from a
pattern present in a baseline tracer concentration, wherein each of
the one or more actual travel times of the tracer corresponds to a
point of entry of one or more points of entry of the lift gas into
the production tubing; determining one or more lift gas loss
parameters, each of the one or more lift gas parameters
corresponding to a point of entry, each of the one or more lift gas
loss parameters accounting for an effect of entry of a portion of
the tracer into the production tubing at the corresponding point of
entry on the actual travel time of the tracer that enters the
production tubing at each point of entry located at a depth greater
than the corresponding point of entry; calculating a velocity of
the lift gas in the annulus and a velocity of the lift gas in the
production tubing for each of the plurality of ranges of well depth
based on the one or more lift gas loss parameters; applying an
injection loss factor to the calculated velocity of the lift gas in
the annulus and the velocity of the lift gas in the production
tubing to account for a non-instantaneous velocity change, wherein
the applied injection loss factor is pre-determined on the basis
of: i) approximating a velocity change due to momentum; or ii)
calculation of a velocity change due to momentum; and determining
the one or more points of entry of the lift gas into the production
tubing based on: (i) the one or more actual travel times of the
tracer, and (ii) the velocity of the lift gas in the annulus and
the velocity of the lift gas in the production tubing that are
calculated for each of the plurality of ranges of well depth,
wherein one or more of the steps of the method are controlled by at
least one computer processor executing one or more computer program
instructions stored on at least one memory device operatively
coupled to the at least one processor.
In an embodiment of the present invention, a gas lift well
performance evaluating method is developed to accurately determine
injection of the lift gas in the production tubing through the
annulus and the depth of the injection point. The method includes
measuring key gas lift well parameter data and concentration of the
tracer present in a substance retrieved from the gas lift well
which was injected into the annulus formed between a well casing
and a production tubing of the gas lift well and entered into the
production tubing through the injection point. The injection point
may involve gas valves or leaks in the production tubing. The
actual travel time of the tracer which corresponds to a time
duration required for injected tracer and lift gas to travel from
the injection point, down the annulus, through one or more points
of entry of the lift gas into the production tubing is then
determined based on a deviation in the concentration of the tracer
measured by accounting for variation in a fractal obtained by
plotting multiple key well parameter data and a concentration of
the tracer in a multi-dimensional time dependent plot. Multiple
actual travel times of the tracer herein corresponds to multiple
points of entry of the lift gas into the production tubing. A lift
gas injection loss factor is also determined which may account for
an effect of the entry of a portion of the tracer into the
production tubing at the corresponding point of entry on the actual
travel time of the tracer that enters the production tubing at each
point of entry located at a depth greater than the corresponding
point of entry. The gas lift well can also be segmented into a
plurality of ranges of well depth and the velocity of the lift gas
while it travels through the annulus and the production tubing for
each of the plurality of ranges of well depth is calculated. The
calculation accounts the changes in the velocity due to momentum
change and turbulence in flow in the tubing resulting from the
entry of a portion of the lift gas into the production tubing at
the corresponding point of entry based on the one or more lift gas
injection loss and thus provides continuous velocity profile of the
lift gas as it travels through the annulus and the production
tubing. The determination of the points of lift gas entry in the
production tubing is performed based on the actual travel times of
the tracer and lift gas and the velocity of the lift gas in the
annulus and in the production tubing that are calculated throughout
the annulus and the production tubing including the change in the
velocity due to momentum change and turbulent flow in the tubing
resulting from the entry of a portion of the lift gas into the
production tubing. Any kinetic equation which relates time of
travel, distance and velocity can be used to determine the lift gas
entry depth by involving the actual travel time of the tracer and a
complete and continuous velocity profile of the tracer as it
travels with the lift gas within the annulus and the production
tubing accounting for non-instantaneous changes in the velocity
within the actual travel time.
In another embodiment of the invention, the velocity of the lift
gas in the annulus is calculated for each of the plurality of
ranges of well depth further based on at least one of: (i) a
plurality of pressures in the annulus, each of the plurality of
pressures corresponding to one of the plurality of ranges of well
depth, (ii) a flow rate of the lift gas in the annulus, (iii) an
injection pressure of the lift gas, (iv) a volume of the annulus
per a unit of well depth, (v) a temperature in the annulus, (vii) a
parameter that represents a frictional force opposing flow in the
annulus, and (viii) a parameter that represents an effect of
gravity on flow in the annulus.
In another embodiment of the invention, the velocity of the lift
gas in the production tubing is calculated for each of the
plurality of ranges of well depth further based on at least one of:
(i) a plurality of pressures in the production tubing, each of the
plurality of pressures corresponding to one of the plurality of
ranges of well depth, (ii) a flow rate of the lift gas in the
production tubing, (iii) a temperature in the production tubing,
(iv) a parameter that represents a frictional force opposing flow
in the production tubing, (v) a parameter that represents an effect
of gravity on flow in the production tubing, (vi) a ratio of a
gaseous phase to a non-gaseous phase in the substance retrieved
from the gas lift well, (vii) a flow rate of one or more gases
present in the substance retrieved from the gas lift well, (viii) a
flow rate of one of more liquids present in the substance retrieved
from the gas lift well, (ix) a well head pressure, and (x) a
separator pressure.
In another embodiment of the invention, a method for evaluating the
performance of a multiple installation gas lift well includes
injecting a tracer into an annulus formed between a well casing and
two or more production tubings of the gas lift well. The annulus
includes a lift gas and the two or more production tubings are
capable of fluid communication with the annulus and substantially
incapable of fluid communication with each other. The gas lift well
further includes one or more points of communication between the
annulus and each of the two or more production tubings, each of the
one or more points of communication corresponding to a valve
position. The method further includes, for each of the two or more
production tubings: measuring, over a period of time, a
concentration of the tracer present in a substance retrieved from
the each of the two or more production tubings, determining one or
more actual travel times of the tracer based on a deviation of the
concentration of the tracer measured over the period of time from a
pattern present in a baseline tracer concentration, each of the one
or more actual travel times of the tracer corresponding to a point
of entry of one or more points of entry of the lift gas into the
each of the two or more production tubings, segmenting the gas lift
well into a plurality of ranges of well depth, determining one or
more lift gas loss parameters, each of the one or more lift gas
parameters corresponding to a point of entry, each of the one or
more lift gas loss parameters accounting for an effect of entry of
a portion of the tracer into the each of the two or more production
tubings at the corresponding point of entry on the actual travel
time of the tracer that enters the each of the two or more
production tubings at each point of entry located at a depth
greater than the corresponding point of entry, calculating a
velocity of the lift gas in the annulus and a velocity of the lift
gas in the each of the two or more production tubings for each of
the plurality of ranges of well depth based on the one or more lift
gas loss parameters, and determining the one or more points of
entry of the lift gas into the each of the two or more production
tubings based on: (i) the one or more actual travel times of the
tracer, and (ii) the velocity of the lift gas in the annulus and
the velocity of the lift gas in the each of the two or more
production tubings calculated for each of the plurality of ranges
of well depth.
In another embodiment of the invention, a gas lift well
surveillance kit includes components for evaluating the performance
of a gas lift well. The components include a separator, a tracer
measurement device, a device for sensing and measuring pressure and
temperature, a flow regulation device, a device for collecting and
storing data, and a computer program for evaluating the performance
of the gas lift well embodied on a computer-readable medium.
In another embodiment of the invention, a computer-readable medium
storing a computer program for evaluating the performance of a gas
lift well is disclosed. The gas lift well includes a well casing, a
production tubing, an annulus formed between the well casing and
the production tubing, the annulus including a lift gas, and one or
more points of communication between the annulus and the production
tubing, each of the one or more points of communication
corresponding to a valve position. The computer program includes
instructions for: measuring, over a period of time, a concentration
of the tracer present in a substance retrieved from the gas lift
well, determining one or more actual travel times of the tracer
based on a deviation of the concentration of the tracer measured
over the period of time from a pattern present in a baseline tracer
concentration, each of the one or more actual travel times of the
tracer corresponding to a point of entry of one or more points of
entry of the lift gas into the production tubing, segmenting the
gas lift well into a plurality of ranges of well depth, determining
one or more lift gas loss parameters, each of the one or more lift
gas parameters corresponding to a point of entry, each of the one
or more lift gas loss parameters accounting for an effect of entry
of a portion of the tracer into the production tubing at the
corresponding point of entry on the actual travel time of the
tracer that enters the production tubing at each point of entry
located at a depth greater than the corresponding point of entry,
calculating a velocity of the lift gas in the annulus and a
velocity of the lift gas in the production tubing for each of the
plurality of ranges of well depth based on the one or more lift gas
loss parameters, and determining one or more points of entry of the
lift gas into the production tubing based on: (i) the one or more
actual travel times of the tracer, and (ii) the velocity of the
lift gas in the annulus and the velocity of the lift gas in the
production tubing that are calculated for each of the plurality of
ranges of well depth.
In one or more of the previously disclosed embodiments, the one or
more determined points of entry of the lift gas may be compared to
the one or more points of communication in order to determine, for
each of the one or more determined points of entry of the lift gas,
whether the point of entry corresponds to a leak of the lift gas
into the production tubing or entry of the lift gas into the
production tubing through a valve.
In one or more of the previously disclosed embodiments of the
invention, a travel time of the tracer may be calculated for each
of the one or more points of communication between the annulus and
the production tubing based on the velocity of the lift gas in the
annulus and the velocity of the lift gas in the production tubing
calculated for each of the plurality of ranges of well depth.
Further, a graphical representation of the concentration of the
tracer measured over the period of time may be displayed on an
output device. The graphical representation may provide an
indication of the travel time of the tracer calculated for each of
the one or more points of communication between the annulus and the
production tubing.
In one or more of the previously disclosed embodiments, the
graphical representation may include one or more peaks in the
concentration of the tracer measured over the period of time, each
of the one of more peaks corresponding to one of the one or more
actual travel times, one of the one or more points of entry of the
lift gas into the production tubing, and one of the one or more
lift gas loss parameters. Further, the one or more lift gas loss
parameters may be determined by: (i) determining an area under each
of the one or more peaks, (ii) summing each area determined for
each of the one or more peaks to obtain a total area, and (iii)
determining, for each of the one or more peaks, a ratio of the area
under the each of the one or more peaks to the total area, the
ratio representing the lift gas loss parameter corresponding to the
each of the one or more peaks.
According to another aspect in the present invention, there is also
provided a computer program product for executing the above gas
lift well performance evaluating methods. The computer usable
program code in the computer program product facilitates
implementing the above gas lift well performance evaluating
methods. A non-transitory computer-readable medium can store a
computer program product for evaluating the performance of a gas
lift well that includes a well casing, a production tubing, an
annulus formed between the well casing and the production tubing,
the annulus including a lift gas, and one or more points of
communication between the annulus and the production tubing,
wherein each of the one or more points of communication corresponds
to a valve position. The computer program product comprises
computer program instructions for: collecting and plotting a
collected key well parameter data set in a multi-dimensional time
dependent plot; and running a dynamic simulator based on a real
time well parameter data for providing transient simulation of the
gas lift well. The computer program product can be embodied in a
non-transitory computer-readable medium which can be disposed in
active communication with the gas lift well. The non-transitory
computer-readable medium is adapted to acquire the gas lift well
parameter data form the form sensors in the gas lift well and
provides them to the computer program product for executing the gas
lift well performance evaluating methods.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a schematic depiction of a gas lift well surveillance kit
in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention.
FIG. 2A is a schematic depiction of a gas lift well surveillance
kit in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention
shown connected to a single completion gas lift well.
FIG. 2B is a schematic depiction of a gas lift well surveillance
kit in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention
shown connected to a dual completion gas lift well.
FIG. 3 depicts a flowchart illustrating a method for evaluating the
performance of a gas lift well in accordance with one or more
embodiments of the invention.
FIG. 4 depicts a flowchart illustrating a method in accordance with
one or more embodiments of the invention.
FIG. 5 depicts a flowchart illustrating a method in accordance with
one or more embodiments of the invention.
FIGS. 6A-6B depict sample graphical representations in accordance
with one or more embodiments of the invention.
FIGS. 7A and 7C depict sample graphical representations of raw data
in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention.
FIGS. 7B and 7D depict sample fractals in accordance with one or
more embodiments of the invention.
FIGS. 8A, 8B, and 8C depict sample graphical representations of
velocity changes in accordance with one or more embodiments of the
invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
In one or more embodiments of the invention, the presence and
depths of one or more points of entry of a lift gas from an annulus
of a gas lift well into production tubing may be determined with
accuracy without the need for well intervention. Based on a
comparison between the depths of the one or more points of entry
and the well configuration, including the positions of gas lift
valves along the production tubing, it may be determined whether
the points of entry correspond to operating gas lift valve(s)
and/or injection gas leak(s) into the production tubing. Thus, one
or more embodiments of the invention provide the capability to
determine whether a gas lift well is multi-pointing (i.e. lift gas
is entering through more than one gas lift valve), whether any
leaks exist in the production tubing, or whether the gas lift valve
is operating as expected. One or more embodiments of the invention
will be described hereinafter with reference to single completion
tubular flow well configurations. However, various embodiments of
the invention may also be used in connection with concentric lift
well configurations (tubular injection with annular production), a
combination of concentric lift and tubular flow well configurations
(also known as casing flow and tubing flow, respectively), and
multiple installation gas lift well configurations (multiple
production strings that share a common annulus).
FIG. 1 depicts a gas lift well surveillance kit 10 in accordance
with one or more embodiments of the invention. The kit 10 includes
components for evaluating the performance of a gas lift well. The
components include a separator 20, a flow regulation device 30, a
tracer measurement device 40, a data collection and storage device
60, a device for sensing and measuring one or parameters, such as,
pressure and temperature 70, and a computer program product 80
embodied on a computer-readable medium.
The separator 20 is configured to separate a gaseous phase from
other phases that may be present in a mixture retrieved from a
production reservoir via production tubing. Fluid that is retrieved
from a production reservoir may include solid particles such as
pieces of the rock formation. Also, in addition to lift gas that is
present in the annulus of a well and that may have entered the
production tubing, other gases present in the reservoir and/or rock
formation may be present in the retrieved mixture. In addition,
various liquids, including a desired production liquid, may be
present in the retrieved mixture.
In one or more embodiments of the invention, a sample stream 90 is
removed from a production stream that may include a multi-phase
mixture retrieved from the reservoir through the production tubing.
The sample stream 90 is removed from the production stream through
a connection to the production line. The separator 20 may act on
the sample stream 90 to separate a gaseous phase from other phases
present in the mixture retrieved from the reservoir. After the
separator 20 separates out the gaseous phase from the sample stream
90, the gaseous phase travels through the flow regulation device 30
which controls a flow rate of the gaseous phase into the tracer
measurement device 40.
The tracer measurement device 40 continuously monitors and analyzes
the gaseous phase for the presence of a tracer. The gaseous phase
may include a mixture of one or more gases. The tracer may be a
compound supplied from a tracer supply source into the annulus of a
gas lift well. The tracer travels along with a lift gas that has
been injected into the annulus and enters the production tubing at
points of entry of the lift gas into the production tubing.
In one or more embodiments of the invention, the tracer employed
may be carbon dioxide. The tracer measurement device 40 may be a
spectrometer, such as an IR spectrometer capable of measuring a
concentration of the tracer present in a retrieved substance. An IR
spectrometer functions by bombarding a sample with electromagnetic
radiation in the infrared range of the electromagnetic spectrum and
determining a transmittance and absorption spectrum for the sample.
A compound will absorb infrared light having a frequency that
coincides with a natural resonant vibrational frequency of a
molecular bond contained within the compound. Various compounds
present in the sample will absorb infrared radiation at different
wavelengths, thereby permitting identification of the compounds
present in the sample. Based on the absorption spectrum produced by
the IR spectrometer, a concentration of compounds present in the
sample can also be quantified. Thus, the IR spectrometer may be
used to measure the concentration of carbon dioxide present in the
gaseous phase that is separated out from the sample stream 90
removed from the production stream. Alternatively, the tracer
measurement device 40 may be any device known the in art for
measuring the concentration of a substance. For example, the tracer
measurement device 40 may be a UV spectrometer. Alternatively, the
tracer employed may be a compound that, when present within a
mixture, alters the pH of the mixture in a detectable manner. If
such a tracer is used, the tracer measurement device may be a pH
meter. The pH meter may determine concentration of the tracer
present in the mixture based on changes in the measured pH. In the
alternative, the tracer measurement device 40 may be any device
capable of measuring the concentration of a tracer compound present
in a multi-phase mixture (in situ measurement), thereby obviating
the need for the separator 20.
The computer program product 80 embodied on the computer-readable
medium is configured to analyze test data acquired by the data
collection and storage device 60 during a well test. The computer
program product 80 is configured to provide gas lift analysis,
design, prediction and optimization using one or more of the
following techniques: complex injection pressure models to
determine velocities in the annulus, multi-phase pressure models to
determine velocities in the production tubing, and well history
data for comparison over time and archiving. The data collection
and storage device 60 may be a datalogger, or any other data
collection and storage device known in the art. The computer
program product 80 is configured to analyze the test data and
provide a highly accurate assessment of the presence and depths of
one or more points of entry of a lift gas from into production
tubing. The computer program product 80 may be executed on a
computing device 50, which may be a personal computer, at the site
of testing and production. Although the computing device 50 is
shown as an element of the kit 10, this is not required. That is,
the computing device 50 may be provided separately from the kit
10.
Additionally, data acquired by the data collection and storage
device 60 may be analyzed off-site. For example, the computing
device 50 may include network communication means (not shown) for
transmitting data to an off-site location. Alternatively, data
collected by the data collection and storage device 60 may be
transferred to another storage device (not shown) for analysis at a
later time off-site. Further, the data collection and storage
device 60 may be provided with a means to communicate with and
transfer test data to the computing device 50 on which the computer
program product 80 is being executed such that the computer program
product 80 may perform analysis of the data. It is important to
note that it is not necessary for the computing device 50 to be
connected to the gas lift well surveillance kit 10, specifically
the data collection and storage device 60, during testing and
acquisition of test data. The computing device 50 may be connected
to the gas lift well surveillance kit 10 after testing is complete
as data acquired by the data collection and storage device 60 can
be retrieved and analyzed at a later time by the computing device
50. After data acquired by the data collection and storage device
60 during a test is analyzed and interpreted, the data may be
erased (i.e. the data collection and storage device 60 may be
reset) in order to perform additional tests.
In one or more embodiments of the invention, the device for sensing
and measuring pressure and temperature 70 may be a
pressure/temperature transducer. The device for sensing and
measuring pressure and temperature 70 may be utilized to sense and
measure temperature and pressure within the sample stream 90 as
well as within an injection line through which the tracer is
injected into the annulus of the gas lift well via a connection to
the injection line.
In one or more embodiments of the invention, the gas lift well
surveillance kit 10 may further include at least one power source,
at least one analog pressure gauge, and piping or tubing for
connecting the gas lift well surveillance kit to a gas lift well.
Additionally, the gas lift well surveillance kit 10 may further
include a digital scale to ensure that a desired amount of tracer
is injected into the well. Further, in one or more embodiments of
the invention, the gas lift well surveillance kit 10 requires only
one temporary connection point on the lift gas injection line and
one connection point on the production line.
In one or more embodiments of the invention, the gas lift well
surveillance kit 10 may further include liquid carbon dioxide
cylinders or bottles, and additionally may include high pressure
nitrogen bottles. Carbon dioxide contained in the carbon dioxide
cylinders is injected into the annulus and serves as the tracer.
However, carbon dioxide cylinders typically do not have sufficient
pressure to overcome the injection pressure of the gas lift well.
The high pressure nitrogen bottles may be used to over-pressurize
the carbon dioxide cylinders, thereby overcoming the injection
pressure of the well and allowing the carbon dioxide to be injected
into the annulus.
In one or more embodiments of the invention, the gas lift well
surveillance kit 10 is compact and portable. For example, in an
embodiment of the invention, the gas lift well surveillance kit
weighs less than 150 lbs and has physical dimensions of
approximately 18''.times.18''.times.18'' or other dimensions
representing a similar area. The gas lift well surveillance kit may
be located inside or outside of the wellhead safe zone by fifty
(50) foot or longer stainless steel hoses.
In one or more embodiments of the invention, the gas lift well
surveillance kit 10 obviates the need for stopping production of
the well during troubleshooting. Further, the gas lift well
surveillance kit 10 according to one or more embodiments of the
invention is safe to operate because no tools are introduced into
the well bore. Moreover, because the determination of points of
entry of the lift gas into the production tubing is related to
surface casing pressure and lift-gas rate measurements, the kit 10
is suitable for situations in which pressure surveys are not
feasible.
FIG. 2A is a schematic depiction of the gas lift surveillance kit
10 of FIG. 1 connected to a single completion gas lift well. The
single completion gas lift well includes production tubing 201 that
extends from at or above a ground surface to a depth within a
reservoir 202. The reservoir 202 contains one or more fluids that
are to be retrieved through the production tubing 201. The gas lift
well depicted in FIG. 2A is a tubular flow well configuration in
which lift gas is supplied from a lift gas supply source 207 into
an annulus 203 formed between a well casing 204 and the production
tubing 201, and one or more fluids are retrieved from the reservoir
202 via the production tubing 201. However, as previously noted,
the gas lift well surveillance kit 10 in accordance with one or
more embodiments of the invention may be used in connection with
other types of gas lift wells including concentric flow (casing
flow) wells and multiple installation gas lift wells (wells that
have two or more production tubings that share a common
annulus).
Still referring to FIG. 2A, lift gas is supplied to the annulus 203
by the lift gas supply 207. Lift gas occupies the annulus 203 and
may enter the production tubing 201 through gas lift valves 205
disposed along the production tubing 201 and/or through leaks
present in the production tubing 201. The lift gas aids in bringing
one or more substances from the reservoir 202 to the surface.
Further, a tracer is supplied into the annulus 203 by a tracer
supply source 206. The tracer may be carbon dioxide. Alternately,
the tracer may be any compound or combination of compounds that is
capable of detection and whose concentration is capable of being
measured in a substance retrieved from the gas lift well. The
tracer may enter the production tubing 201 through one or more of
the gas lift valves 205 and/or through leaks in the production
tubing 201.
Containers of high pressure nitrogen gas may be used to increase
the pressure of the carbon dioxide supplied by the tracer supply
source 206, if necessary to overcome an injection pressure of the
gas lift well. A packer 208 is optionally formed within the well
casing 204 to isolate the production tubing 201 from the annulus
203.
Still referring to FIG. 2A, gas lift mandrels having gas lift
valves 205 operatively connected thereto are disposed along the
production tubing 201. Variation in tubing and casing pressures
causes the gas lift valves 205 to open and close, thereby allowing
the lift gas to be injected into the production tubing 201.
The gas lift well surveillance kit 10 may be connected to the
production tubing 201 in order to obtain the sample stream 90 from
the production stream for testing and analysis. More specifically,
the gas lift well surveillance kit 10 may be connected via tubing
to a wellhead tree disposed on a top portion of the production
tubing 201 in order to provide a continuous sample stream 90 of the
production stream to the kit 10 for analysis. Further, the
connection of the kit 10 to the tracer supply source 206 allows the
device for sensing and measuring pressure and temperature to
monitor the pressure and temperature within the injection line
through which tracer is supplied from the tracer supply source
206.
FIG. 2B is a schematic depiction of the gas lift well surveillance
kit 10 in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention
connected to a dual completion gas lift well. Although the
description that follows will be presented with reference to a dual
completion gas lift well, the invention is not limited to such a
well, and a gas lift well surveillance kit in accordance with one
or more embodiments of the invention may be used in connection with
a multiple installation well of any configuration known in the
art.
The dual completion gas lift well includes two production tubings
209, 210 disposed within a well casing 211. One production tubing
209 (hereinafter "short string") extends from at or above a ground
surface to a depth within a first reservoir 212. The other
production tubing 210 (hereinafter "long string") extends from at
or above a ground surface to a depth within a second reservoir 213.
Two packers 214, 215 are used to isolate the two reservoirs 212,
213. A dual packer 214 is provided that includes two bores through
which the short string 209 and the long string 210 extend. A single
packer 215 is provided that includes a single bore through which
the long string 210 extends. Together, the two packers 214, 215
serve to isolate one production reservoir from the other, and thus
serve to isolate the short string 209 from the long string 210. As
a result, the short string 209 and the long string 210 are
substantially incapable of fluid communication with each other.
Such a design maintains the integrity of the two production streams
generated from reservoirs 212, 213.
Gas lift mandrels having gas lift valves 217 operatively connected
thereto are disposed at positions along the long string 210.
Similarly, gas lift mandrels having gas lift valves 218 operatively
connected thereto are disposed at positions along the short string
209. The short string 209 and the long string 210 share a common
annulus 216. That is, the short string 209 and the long string 210
are each capable of potential fluid communication with the annulus
(through their respective gas lift valves 218, 217).
Similarly to FIG. 2A, lift gas is supplied to the annulus 216 by
the lift gas supply source 220. Lift gas occupies the annulus 216
and may enter the short string 209 and/or the long string 210
through one or more of their respective gas lift valves 218, 217
and/or through leaks present in either string. The lift gas aids in
bringing one or more substances from reservoirs 212, 213 to the
surface. Further, a tracer is supplied into the annulus 216 by a
tracer supply source 219. The tracer may be carbon dioxide.
Alternately, the tracer may be any compound or combination of
compounds that is capable of detection and whose concentration is
capable of being measured in a substance retrieved from the gas
lift well. The tracer may enter (along with the lift gas) the short
string 209 and/or the long string 210 through one or more of their
respective gas lift valves 218, 217 and/or through leaks in either
string.
Two gas lift well surveillance kits 10 in accordance with one or
more embodiments of the invention are shown connected to components
of the dual completion well in FIG. 2B. It is not necessary that
the two kits include the same number and type of components. A
sample stream is generated from production stream 1 (which includes
one or more fluids produced from reservoir 213). The sample stream
is fed to Kit 1 which analyzes the sample stream in the manner
described earlier, and which will be described in further detail
hereinafter. Similarly, a sample stream is generated from
production stream 2 (which includes one or more fluids produced
from reservoir 212). This sample stream is fed to Kit 2 which then
analyzes the sample stream in the manner described earlier, and
which will be described in further detail hereinafter.
One or more embodiments of the invention include
computer-implemented methods described in greater detail below. In
various embodiments, methods of the invention may be carried out
entirely on one apparatus or computing device. Alternatively,
portions of the methods may be carried out on two or more computers
connected by a network or a network device connecting the
computers. The order of method elements as described herein does
not necessarily limit the order in which the elements can be
performed.
One or more embodiments of the invention may be implemented
partially, or in whole, as software modules installed and running
on one or more data processing systems (`computers`), such as
servers, workstations, tablet computers, PCs, personal digital
assistants (`PDAs`), smart phones, and so on. The computer includes
at least one computer processor as well as a computer memory,
including both volatile random access memory (`RAM`) and some form
or forms of non-volatile computer memory such as a hard disk drive,
an optical disk drive, or an electrically erasable programmable
read-only memory space (also known as `EEPROM` or `Flash` memory).
The computer memory is connected through a system bus to the
processor and to other system components. Thus, the software
modules are program instructions stored in computer memory.
An operating system is stored in the computer memory. The operating
system may be any appropriate operating system such as Windows 98,
Windows NT 4.0, Windows 2000, Windows XP, Windows Vista, Windows 7,
Windows 8, Mac OS X, UNIX, LINUX, or AIX from International
Business Machines Corporation. A network stack may also be stored
in memory. The network stack is a software implementation of
cooperating computer networking protocols to facilitate network
communications.
The computer may also include one or more input/output interface
adapters. Input/output interface adapters may implement
user-oriented input/output through software drivers and computer
hardware for controlling output to output devices such as computer
display screens, as well as user input from input devices, such as
keyboards and mice.
FIG. 3 depicts a flow chart illustrating a method for evaluating
the performance of a gas lift well in accordance with one or more
embodiments of the invention. In step S300 of the method
illustrated in FIG. 3, an amount of tracer is injected into the
annulus of a gas lift well through an injection line. As described
earlier, the tracer may be carbon dioxide. The tracer may be
supplied from a tracer supply source that includes one or more
containers of carbon dioxide accompanied by one or more containers
of nitrogen to over-pressurize the carbon dioxide in order to
overcome an injection pressure of the gas lift well.
The tracer may be supplied to the annulus of a well in liquid
phase. For example, the tracer supply source may include containers
of liquid carbon dioxide that are pressurized to at least a minimum
pressure required to maintain the carbon dioxide in a liquid phase.
The liquefied carbon dioxide rapidly converts to a gaseous phase
upon injection into the annulus. Due to the high compressibility of
carbon dioxide, a relatively small volume of liquefied carbon
dioxide converts to a relatively large volume of gaseous carbon
dioxide upon injection into the annulus. Therefore, injecting
liquid phase carbon dioxide is advantageous because a relatively
small amount of injected carbon dioxide produces a relatively large
volume of gaseous carbon dioxide which improves the accuracy of
measurement results obtained by the tracer measurement device.
Further, as previously described, a gas well surveillance kit
according to one or more embodiments of the invention that is used
to perform the method illustrated in FIG. 3 may include a digital
scale to precisely control the amount of tracer introduced into the
annulus. In addition, a gas lift well surveillance kit in
accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention includes a
device for sensing and measuring pressure and temperature within
the injection line through which the tracer is injected in the
annulus. The amount of tracer injected into the annulus and the
rate of tracer injection may be controlled based on measurements
obtained by the device for sensing and measuring pressure and
temperature.
Upon injecting the tracer into the annulus of the gas lift well, in
step S301, the concentration of the tracer is measured in a sample
stream obtained from a production stream of the gas lift well. As
described earlier, a gas lift well surveillance kit in accordance
with one or more embodiments of the invention includes a separator
that is configured to separate out a gaseous phase from a
multi-phase sample stream. The gaseous phase is monitored for the
presence of the tracer. Tracer that is injected into the annulus of
the gas lift well will enter the production tubing at any point
that the lift gas contained within the annulus enters the
production tubing (e.g. through gas lift valves positioned along
the production tubing and/or leaks in the production tubing).
A gas lift well surveillance kit in accordance with one or more
embodiments of the invention includes a tracer measurement device
that measures, over a period of time, the concentration of the
tracer present in, for example, a gaseous phase that has been
separated from a sample stream obtained from a production stream.
The duration of the tracer measurement depends on the physical
characteristics of the well surveyed and can range from 60 minutes
to 12 or more hours. Typical tracer return times are between 1 hour
and 7 hours.
In step S301, the tracer measurement device may measure an initial
baseline concentration of tracer present in the gaseous phase
separated from the sample stream. The baseline tracer concentration
may refer to the concentration of a certain initial amount of
tracer that is present in the production stream prior to any of the
injected tracer entering the production tubing For example, the
tracer measurement device may detect small, random fluctuations in
the concentration of the tracer measured in produced reservoir
fluid. These fluctuations may be indicative of a baseline tracer
concentration present in the produced fluid or measurement
error.
The baseline tracer concentration may vary in a non-periodic
manner, or may remain substantially constant. Alternately, the
baseline tracer concentration may oscillate periodically. For
example, the baseline tracer concentration may oscillate
sinusoidally, or with any other periodicity. Periodic oscillation
of the baseline tracer concentration may be due to a repeating
variation in casing and/or tubing pressures that causes one or more
gas lift valves to open and close in a periodic manner.
Instability in the baseline tracer concentration can, however, make
it difficult to determine the concentration or even the existence
of the tracer in the returns (that is, in the substance retrieved
from the gas lift well) or returns data. FIG. 7A shows a baseline
tracer concentration. As seen in FIG. 7A, the baseline tracer data
is not stable. It can be, therefore, difficult to impossible to
analyze actual tracer returns data by independently reviewing the
baseline tracer data shown in FIG. 7A. One or more embodiments of
the invention involve a method for facilitating enhanced
identification of tracer returns when the baseline tracer data
reveals the presence of noise or instability.
The method involves adjusting or correcting the tracer returns data
using one or more known principles of signal processing. As is
known, signal processing involves analysis of signals of interest.
The signal of interest can include, for example, sensor readings
obtained by a device measuring the tracer returns data. Adjustment
of the tracer returns data can enable the capturing of vital
patterns while substantially eliminating noise, aberrations and
other instability in the tracer returns data. Therefore, the
adjustment of the tracer returns data can facilitate substantially
more accurate identification of actual or real tracer returns
data.
A computer program can be used to implement one or more custom
signal processing algorithms on the tracer returns data. The
algorithms can involve one or more operations such as data
smoothing, filtering and time-frequency analysis on the tracer
returns data.
The method further includes relating the adjusted tracer returns
data to one or more key well parameter data. In one or more
embodiments of the invention, the gas lift well surveillance kit,
as described earlier, can be used to record key well parameter data
during a preliminary well survey. The key well parameters include
one or more parameters used to calculated lift gas velocities in
the annulus and in the production tubing. The key well parameters
can include one or more of injection rate, casing mechanical
layout, injection pressure, injection temperature, lift gas
specific gravity, total produced liquid rate, water cut, formation
gas rate, tubing head pressure (THP), casing head pressure (CHP),
production separator pressure, production manifold pressure, and
tracer concentration. Other information include mechanical data
that includes tubing string, casing string and flowline
information, installed mandrels and valves, lift gas properties,
reservoir data, well test data, deviation data, and current
gradient surveys. Information captured during the preliminary well
survey and SCADA data enable the accurate calculation of lift gas
velocities in the annulus and in the production tubing, and thus,
enable analysis of tracer return results with little to no
calibration required.
The method further includes analyzing the adjusted tracer returns
data and the key well parameter data using one or more advanced
techniques involving non-linear data. For example, a computer
program can be used to plot the adjusted tracer return data and the
key well parameter data in a multi-dimensional time dependent
"chaos" plot or a recurrence plot to generate a pattern.
The method also includes displaying or visualizing a generated
pattern formed by plotting the data in, preferably, three or
four-dimensions in order to expose actual tracer returns data. The
pattern can be displayed on a Web client or on a user/operator
desktop. The pattern may be a "chaotic" pattern and can be
described as a fractal. Fractals are geometric patterns that are
repeated at ever smaller scales to produce irregular shapes and
surfaces that cannot be represented by classical geometry.
The method further includes visually inspecting the generated
fractal to determine actual tracer returns. Alternately, the method
may include analyzing the generated fractal using a computer
program in order to determine actual tracer returns.
For example, in reviewing FIG. 7A, it can be seen that tubing head
pressure appears to swing with the baseline tracer concentration.
Therefore, raw or actual tracer returns data can be adjusted to
remove noise or instability. The adjusted tracer returns data and
key well parameters, such as, THP and injection pressure can be
plotted in a multi-dimensional plot over time. The resultant
fractal is displayed in FIG. 7B. FIG. 7B provides a quick and
efficient means for determining that there are four tracer
returns.
Similarly, the baseline tracer concentration is not stable in FIG.
7C. It can be difficult to impossible to determine actual tracer
returns data by reviewing the tracer trend in FIG. 7C
independently. As is shown in FIG. 7C, the THP and CHP appear to
swing with the baseline tracer concentration. Therefore, raw or
actual tracer returns data can be adjusted to remove noise or
instability. The adjusted tracer returns data and key well
parameters, such as, injection pressure, THP and tracer
concentration can be plotted in a multi-dimensional plot over time.
The resultant fractal is displayed in FIG. 7D. FIG. 7D provides a
quick and efficient means for determining that there are five
tracer returns.
According to another embodiment, a method for identifying problems
with key well parameter data includes adjusting one or more key
well parameter data and analyzing the adjusted data using
multi-dimensional time dependent plots. Key well parameters have
been described earlier. According to this method, problems with
data or information on key well parameters can be quickly
identified on a substantially real-time basis. This method can also
facilitate an enhanced understanding of the gas lift well.
The method includes collecting data on a plurality of key well
parameters on a real-time basis. For example, the data can be
collected using the gas lift well surveillance kit, as described
earlier. The method further includes adjusting or correcting, on a
substantially real-time basis, the collected key well parameter
data when the collected data reveals the presence of noise or other
aberrations. The collected data can be adjusted using one or more
known principles of signal processing. As is known, signal
processing involves analysis of signals of interest. The signal of
interest can include, for example, sensor readings obtained by a
device measuring the key well parameter data. Adjustment of key
well parameter data can substantially eliminate noise, aberrations
and other instability in the key well parameter data. A computer
program can be used to implement one or more custom signal
processing algorithms on the collected data. The algorithms can
involve one or more operations such as data smoothing, filtering
and time-frequency analysis on the key well parameter data.
The method further includes analyzing the adjusted key well
parameter data using one or more advanced techniques involving
non-linear data. For example, a computer program can be used to
plot the adjusted key well parameter data in a multi-dimensional
time dependent "chaos" plot or a recurrence plot to generate a
pattern. In this manner, a plurality of key well parameters can be
related on a single plot in a particular manner that has not been
commonly employed in the art.
The method also includes displaying or visualizing the generated
pattern formed by plotting the key well parameter data in,
preferably, three or four-dimensions in order to expose actual
tracer returns data. The pattern can be displayed on a Web client
or on a user/operator desktop. The "chaotic" pattern may be a
fractal, as described earlier. The method further includes visually
inspecting the fractal to determine the presence of one or more
clusters or groupings and to determine if one or more of the key
well parameter data appears to be outside a predetermined normal
range.
The graphing engine may be used, for example, in conducting a
WellTracer.RTM. analysis by AppSmiths WellTracer, LLC. of Katy,
Tex. WellTracer.RTM. is a non-invasive method to determine downhole
conditions, and in particular, it can be used to find the lift
point, see if the well is multi-pointing and to identify leaks from
the casing into the tubing. The graphing engine may be incorporated
into the WinGLUE.RTM. product suite deployed by AppSmiths Software,
LLC.
In step S302 of the method of the invention illustrated in FIG. 3,
one or more actual travel times of the tracer are determined. An
actual travel time of the tracer corresponds to a deviation in the
measured concentration of the tracer over the period of time from a
pattern present in the baseline concentration of the tracer. The
term "pattern" as used herein with reference to the baseline tracer
concentration refers to any concentration of tracer that is not
indicative of an actual travel time of tracer. An actual travel
time of the tracer refers to a duration corresponding to the time
required for injected tracer to travel from the injection point,
down the annulus, through an operating valve or leak in the
production tubing, and return to a measurement point. The term
"pattern" should not be construed to require any periodicity or
regularity in the baseline tracer concentration. The term "pattern"
merely refers to any characteristic of the baseline tracer
concentration that identifies the baseline tracer concentration as
such and distinguishes it from a tracer concentration that
indicates an actual travel time of the tracer.
In step S303, the gas lift well that is being tested is segmented
into a plurality of ranges of well depth. The depth of the well may
be determined using any starting point and extending to any desired
depth within the well. Determination of the well depth may vary
based on the particular characteristics of the well surveyed. In an
exemplary embodiment, well depth may be calculated from an
injection point of the tracer to a depth within the well. The
ranges of well depth into which the well is segmented may vary in
size and may or may not overlap. Alternatively, some of the ranges
of well depth may overlap while other ranges do not. In an
embodiment of the invention, the well depth is segmented into a
plurality of ranges of well depth that are substantially equal in
size and do not overlap. For example, assuming a well depth of 4000
ft. the well may be segmented into 100 ranges of well depth, each
range corresponding to 40 ft of well depth. It should be noted that
the ranges of well depth will not be of equal size in an embodiment
of the invention in which lift gas velocities are determined using
integration. It should be noted that the segmentation of the well
into a plurality of well depths (step S303) may occur prior to,
concurrently with, or subsequent to any of steps S300-S302.
In step S304 of the method of the invention illustrated in FIG. 3,
one or more lift gas loss parameters are determined. Each lift gas
loss parameter can correspond to a particular point of entry of the
lift gas into the production tubing and provides a measure of an
effect of entry of a portion of the tracer into the corresponding
point of entry on the actual travel time of the tracer that enters
the production tubing at each point of entry that is located at a
depth greater than the corresponding point of entry. Each lift gas
loss parameter is determined based on the tracer concentration
measured by the tracer measurement device. As noted above, a
deviation in a pattern present in the baseline concentration of
tracer indicates an actual travel time of tracer which, in turn,
corresponds to a point of entry of tracer (and lift gas) into the
production tubing.
When lift gas enters at a particular point of entry into the
production tubing, the velocity of the lift gas in the annulus (and
by extension the velocity of the tracer in the annulus) is reduced
for any well depths below that point of entry. The extent to which
the velocity is reduced is proportionate to the amount of lift gas
that entered into the production tubing at that point of entry. In
a similar manner, the velocity of the lift gas in the production
tubing above the point of entry of the lift gas into the production
tubing is increased proportionately to the amount of lift gas that
entered the production tubing at that point of entry. As such, the
lift gas loss parameter that corresponds to a particular point of
entry provides a measure of the effect of entry of lift gas into
the production tubing at that point of entry on the velocity of
lift gas in the annulus at depths greater than the point of entry
and the velocity of lift gas in the production tubing at shallower
depths than the point of entry. The determination of the lift gas
loss parameters will be described in greater detail later through
reference to FIG. 5.
After a lift gas loss parameter has been determined for each point
of entry of the lift gas into the production tubing, a velocity of
the lift gas in the annulus is calculated, in step S305, for each
of the plurality of ranges of well depth determined by the
segmentation in step S303. The velocities of the lift gas in the
annulus are calculated for the plurality of ranges of well depth
based on the one or more lift gas loss parameters determined in
step S304. Similarly, in step S306, a velocity of the lift gas in
the production tubing is calculated for each of the plurality of
ranges of well depth based on the one or more lift gas loss
parameters determined in step S304. Steps S305 and S306 may be
performed concurrently or with partial overlap. It should be noted
that the size and number of ranges of well depth into which the
well is segmented may not be the same for the annulus and the
production tubing. Thus, as a velocity of the lift gas is
calculated for each range of well depth, the number of discrete
velocities calculated in the production tubing may differ from the
number of discrete velocities calculated in the annulus.
In addition to the one or more lift gas loss parameters, one or
more other parameters may be used to calculate the lift gas
velocities in the annulus and/or in the production tubing. For
example, in addition to the one or more lift gas loss parameters,
one or more of the following well parameters may be used to
determine the lift gas velocity in the annulus for each of the
plurality of ranges of well depth: (i) a plurality of pressures in
the annulus, each of the plurality of pressures corresponding to
one of the plurality of ranges of well depth, (ii) a flow rate of
the lift gas in the annulus, (iii) an injection pressure of the
lift gas, (iv) a volume of the annulus per a unit of well depth,
(v) a temperature in the annulus, (vii) a parameter that represents
a frictional force opposing flow in the annulus, and (viii) a
parameter that represents an effect of gravity on flow in the
annulus. In calculating the velocity of the lift gas in the annulus
for a particular range of well depth from among the plurality of
ranges of well depth, one or more parameters listed above may be
measured or determined specifically for that range of well depth.
For example, if the velocity of the lift gas in the annulus were
being determined for a range of well depth from 400-450 ft, a
temperature in the annulus at this range of well depth, a pressure
in the annulus at this range of well depth, a flow rate of the lift
gas in the annulus across this range of well depth, and so on may
be used. In this manner, a highly accurate calculation of the
velocity of the lift gas in the annulus that is specific to each
range of well depth is obtainable.
Similar to the calculation of velocities of the lift gas in the
annulus, in addition to the one or more lift gas loss parameters,
one or more of the following parameters may be used to calculate
the velocity of the lift gas in the production tubing for each of
the plurality of ranges of well depth: (i) a plurality of pressures
in the production tubing, each of the plurality of pressures
corresponding to one of the plurality of ranges of well depth, (ii)
a flow rate of the lift gas in the production tubing, (iii) a
temperature in the production tubing, (iv) a parameter that
represents a frictional force opposing flow in the production
tubing, (v) a parameter that represents an effect of gravity on
flow in the production tubing, (vi) a ratio of a gaseous phase to a
non-gaseous phase in the substance retrieved from the gas lift
well, (vii) a flow rate of one or more gases present in the
substance retrieved from the gas lift well, (viii) a flow rate of
one of more liquids present in the substance retrieved from the gas
lift well, (ix) a well head pressure, and (x) a separator pressure.
In calculating the velocity of the lift gas in the production
tubing for a particular range of well depth from among the
plurality of ranges of well depth, one or more parameters listed
above may be measured or determined specifically for that range of
well depth. For example, if the velocity of the lift gas in the
production were being determined for a range of well depth from
400-450 ft. a temperature in the production tubing at this range of
well depth, a pressure in the production tubing at this range of
well depth, a flow rate of the lift gas in the production tubing
across this range of well depth, and so on may be used. In this
manner, an accurate calculation of the velocity of the lift gas in
the production tubing that is specific to each range of well depth
is obtainable.
It should be noted that in addition to, or as an alternative to,
the parameters listed above, other parameters may be used to
determine the velocity of the lift gas in the annulus and/or the
velocity of the lift gas in the production tubing for each of the
plurality of ranges of well depth.
In one or more additional embodiments of the invention, the
velocity of the lift gas in the annulus and/or the velocity of the
lift gas in the production tubing may be calculated in a
progressive or iterative manner. More specifically, for example, a
velocity of the lift gas in the annulus that is calculated for a
first range of well depth may be used as a parameter, potentially
along with one or more other parameters, to determine a velocity of
the lift gas in the annulus for a second range of well depth that
immediately follows the first range of well depth. This manner of
determining velocities may then proceed in an iterative fashion
until the velocity for any given range of well depth in the annulus
is determined based on a velocity calculated for a range of well
depth that immediately precedes the given range of well depth.
The iterative calculation of velocities will be described in
greater detail through reference to FIG. 4. FIG. 4 illustrates an
iterative determination of velocities in the annulus or the
production tubing in accordance with an embodiment of the
invention. For simplicity, however, the method illustrated in FIG.
4 will be described with reference to calculating lift gas
velocities in the annulus. In initial step S400, values of at least
two parameters are determined for an initial range of well depth of
the plurality of ranges of well depth. For example, the at least
two parameters may include calculating velocity in the casing (or
the injection string) and the velocity in the tubing (or the
production string) Subsequently, in step S401, a velocity of the
lift gas in the annulus is calculated for the initial range of well
depth based on the determined values of the at least two
parameters. For example, the lift gas velocity for the initial
range of well depth may be calculated based on the velocity in
injection string and the production string corresponding to the
initial range. If the values of one or more additional parameters
are determined, these values may additionally be used to determine
the lift gas velocity in the annulus for the initial range of well
depth. The initial range of well depth may be the range of well
depth having the shallowest maximum well depth from among the
plurality of ranges of well depth. The "well depth" of a particular
point within a well, as used herein, refers to a distance from that
point within the well to a measurement starting point. For example,
the well depth of a particular point within a well may correspond
to a distance from an injection point of the tracer to that point
within the well. Alternatively, the measurement starting point for
determining well depth may any point within the well or any point
at or above the surface of the well.
Conventional thinking has been that any changes to the velocity of
the lift gas, due to a loss of the lift gas through an injection
point, in the annulus or the production tubing is instantaneous as
shown. However, Applicant discovered through extensive studies
involving large samples of tracer data that such velocity changes
are not instantaneous in reality. FIG. 8A, FIG. 8B, and FIG. 8C
depicts a graphical representation of tracer concentration against
time. FIG. 8A is graphical representation of a velocity change that
is expected to occur instantaneously. FIG. 8B is a graphical
representation of an actual velocity change in the annulus or the
production tubing. It is clear by observing both FIG. 8A and FIG.
8B that the velocity change is non-instantaneous at, for example,
2:46:40 and 4:10:00.
Also, Applicant discovered the effect of such non-instantaneous
velocity change is more pronounced as the number of tracer returns
increases. Therefore, in order to ensure that the well depth
calculated below a first injection point or an initial well depth
is substantially accurate, it is important to account for the
effects caused by the non-instantaneous velocity change.
According to one embodiment of the invention, a method for
adjusting for non-instantaneous velocity changes in the annulus or
the production tubing may include the step of initially determining
the one or more lift gas loss parameters. The method may further
include the step of calculating the velocity of the lift gas in the
casing and in the tubing. The method may include the step of
applying an injection loss factor to the calculated velocity in the
casing and in the tubing at an initial or first injection point in
order to account for the non-instantaneous velocity changes. The
injection loss factor to be applied may be determined on the basis
of: i) approximating a velocity change due to momentum; or ii)
calculation of velocity change due to momentum. The application of
the injection loss factor may cause an adjustment of the calculated
velocity, that is, the adjusted velocity may be faster on average
than the initially calculated velocity. The method may further
include the step of applying the adjusted velocity to one or more
remaining injection points. At each point of injection, the
injection loss factor may be calculated based on the conditions at
that point. This may be done to obtain a new velocity for
conditions beyond the point of injection. This new velocity may
only be utilized until the next injection point is reached. Each
injection point reduces the amount of gas in the system, and
therefore the above steps are repeated until all the injection gas
may be accounted for and no injection gas remains in the
system.
FIG. 10 depicts an example of how the travel time that results from
instantaneous changes in velocity differs significantly from the
travel time that includes even the approximated effects of
momentum. As shown, the line labelled "Velocity (step response)"
represents the velocity profile of gas in the casing when the
velocity changes are taken to be instantaneous. This velocity
profile has a marked stair-step appearance. The travel time
calculated from this velocity profile is approximately 14,500
seconds. The line labelled "Velocity (gradient response)"
represents the velocity profile when momentum is approximated by a
simple gradient and demonstrates the effect of applying an
injection loss factor at each injection point. The total travel
time in this case is approximately 13,000 seconds. Note that the
horizontal axis is distance, so the velocity lines are the velocity
of gas in the casing at depth and the travel time lines represent
the total time required for the gas in the casing to reach that
depth.
Referring back to FIG. 4, in step S402, one or more successive
ranges of well depth are identified. As used herein with respect to
FIG. 4, successive ranges of well depth refer to ranges of well
depth other than the initial range of well depth. The successive
ranges of well depth may, for example, include all ranges of well
depth other than the initial range of well depth, or may optionally
include only some of the plurality of ranges of well depth other
than the initial range. Subsequently, in step S403, a determination
is made as to whether a velocity of the lift gas has been
calculated for each of the identified successive ranges of well
depth. If the determination in step S403 is YES, a lift gas
velocity has been determined for each range of well depth, and the
method ends. If the determination in step S403 is NO, then, based
on predetermined criteria, a range of well depth is selected from
among the ranges of well depth for which no lift gas velocity has
been calculated (S404). The predetermined criteria that determine
which range of well depth from among the successive ranges of well
depth will be selected may be any criteria that allow a range of
well depth to be unambiguously selected. For example, the
predetermined criteria may require selection of the range of well
depth having a smallest maximum well depth, where well depth in
this scenario is measured from a point at or above a surface of the
well. Alternately, the predetermined criteria may require selection
of the range of well depth having the largest maximum well depth
from among the identified ranges of well depth.
Thereafter, in step S405, values of the at least two parameters are
determined for the selected range of well depth based on the
determined values of the at least two parameters for the range of
well depth that immediately precedes the selected range. For
example, pressure and temperature may be determined for the
selected range based on the pressure and temperature determined for
the immediately preceding range. Subsequently, in step S406, the
lift gas velocity is calculated for the selected range of well
depth based on the determined values of the at least two parameters
for the selected range of well depth. For example, the lift gas
velocity may be calculated for the selected range based on the
determined pressure and temperature corresponding to the selected
range.
After the lift gas velocity has been calculated for the selected
range of well depth, a determination is again made as to whether a
lift gas velocity has been calculated for all successive ranges of
well depth that have been identified (S403). If the determination
in step S403 is YES, the iterative calculation of lift gas
velocities is complete. If the determination is NO, a range of well
depth is again selected from among the ranges of well depth for
which no lift gas velocity has been calculated based on the
predetermined criteria.
Referring back to FIG. 3, after a velocity of the lift gas in the
annulus and a velocity of the lift gas in the production tubing
have been calculated for each of the plurality of ranges of well
depth, in step S307, one or more points of entry of the lift gas
into the production tubing are determined. More specifically, the
one or more points of entry of the lift gas into the production
tubing are determined based on the one or more actual travel times
of the tracer determined in step S302 and the velocity of the lift
gas in the annulus and the velocity of the lift gas in the
production tubing calculated for each of the plurality of ranges of
well depth.
The one or more points of entry of the lift gas into the production
tubing correspond to well depths at which lift gas is entering the
production tubing. In accordance with one or more embodiments of
the invention, the method illustrated in FIG. 3 may further include
a step in which the one or more determined points of entry of the
lift gas into the production tubing are compared to the one or more
points of communication (used herein to refer to gas lift valves or
the positions of gas lift valves along the production tubing). Such
a comparison permits a determination to be made as to whether a
particular determined point of entry of the lift gas corresponds to
a leak of the lift gas into the production tubing or entry of the
lift gas into the production tubing through a gas lift valve.
The determination of one or more lift gas loss parameters in
accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention will be
described in greater detail through reference to FIG. 5. In an
initial step S500, a graphical representation of the tracer
concentration measured over a period of time is provided. The
graphical representation may be a Cartesian plot of tracer
concentration as a function of time. The units of measurement are
not limited and may be any suitable units for measuring
concentration and time. In one or more embodiments of the
invention, the graphical representation may be generated by the
computer program product (FIG. 1, element 80) of the gas lift well
surveillance kit 10 and displayed through a user interface provided
on, for example, the computing device 50. Alternately, the
graphical representation may be transferred to a remote computing
device through network communications means provided in the
computing device 50 and displayed to a user on the remote computing
device. As described earlier, the graphical representation may
indicate a baseline tracer concentration. Further, the graphical
representation may indicate one or more actual travel times of the
tracer through one or more peaks in the tracer concentration. As
discussed earlier, an actual travel time of the tracer is any
deviation from a pattern present in the baseline tracer
concentration. The term "pattern" does not require any regularity
or periodicity in the baseline tracer concentration, but merely
refers to a characteristic of the tracer concentration that
identifies it as a baseline tracer concentration. The graphical
representation will include a peak in tracer concentration for each
actual travel time of the tracer.
After the graphical representation that includes one or more peaks
is provided, in step S501, an area under each peak is determined.
The area may be determined using integral calculus or another
mathematical technique. Subsequently, in step S502, each determined
area is summed to yield a total area. That is, the area under each
peak is summed together to arrive at a total area under all peaks
in tracer concentration.
Thereafter, in step S503, a lift gas loss parameter is determined
for each point of entry. Each peak in the graphical representation
corresponds to an actual travel time of the tracer. Each peak in
tracer concentration also corresponds to an actual point of entry
of the tracer, and thus the lift gas, from the annulus into the
production tubing. An actual travel time of the tracer corresponds
to duration from a time of injection of the tracer into the annulus
until the tracer returns to a measurement point. Thus, each point
of entry of the tracer will have an actual travel time associated
with it. Further, each point of entry will have a corresponding
peak on the graphical representation at the actual travel time of
the tracer associated with that point of entry.
In step S503, a lift gas parameter is calculated for each point of
entry by calculating a ratio of the area under the peak that
corresponds to that point of entry with the total area under all
the peaks. The lift gas parameter that corresponds to a particular
point of entry may thus be correlated to the amount of tracer lost
from the annulus into the production tubing at that point of entry.
For example, if the area under a particular peak represents 25% of
the total area under all peaks, it can be concluded that 25% of the
total tracer injected into the annulus entered the production
tubing at that point of entry (either through a leak in the
production tubing or through a point of communication (i.e.
valve).
After a lift gas loss parameter has been determined for each peak
(point of entry), in step S504, a travel time of the tracer
corresponding to each point of communication is determined based on
the one or more determined lift gas parameters. As noted earlier, a
point of communication generally corresponds to a valve, but more
generally may correspond to any predetermined potential point of
entry of lift gas into the production, in contrast to, for example,
a leak into the production tubing which is not anticipated as a
predetermined potential point of entry of lift gas. A tracer travel
time for a particular point of communication corresponds to
duration between a time of injection of the tracer into the annulus
and time of return of the tracer to a point of measurement,
assuming the tracer traveled down the annulus and entered the
production tubing at the particular point of entry. The lift gas
velocities in the annulus and in the production tubing which are
determined for each of the plurality of ranges of well depth are
used to determine the tracer travel times for each of the points of
communication.
As an example, assume a graphical representation indicates two
peaks in tracer concentration, and the lift gas parameter for peak
1 is 35% and the lift gas loss parameter for peak 2 is 65%. In
determining the travel time of the tracer for a point of
communication, all peaks corresponding to points of entry having
well depths shallower than the point of communication are first
identified. A well depth corresponding to a point of entry may be
calculated based on the actual tracer travel time associated with
the point of entry and the velocities of the lift gas in the
annulus and in the production tubing that are calculated based on
the one or more lift gas loss parameters. After the depth of each
point of entry is determined, the relative depth of a point of
communication may be ascertained, and as such, a determination as
to which lift gas parameters will be used in determining the travel
time for the point of communication may be made.
In the present example, assume that only peak 1 corresponds to a
point of entry having a well depth shallower than the point of
communication for which a travel time is being determined. In
determining the travel time for the point of communication, a
velocity of the lift gas in the annulus would not be affected by
the peak 1 point of entry at a well depth that is shallower than
the well depth of the peak 1 point of entry. A velocity of the lift
gas in the annulus would be lowered by 35% (the lift gas loss
parameter) for the range of well depth between the peak 1 point of
entry and the point of communication. Similarly, a velocity of the
lift gas in the production tubing for the range of well depth
between the point of communication and the peak 1 point of entry
would be unaffected by the peak 1 lift gas loss parameter. Further,
for the range of well depth from the peak 1 point of entry to a
measurement point, the velocity of the lift gas in the production
tubing would be increased based on the lift gas parameter for peak
1 in order to compensate for the additional amount of lift gas
entering the production tubing at the point of entry corresponding
to peak 1.
In this manner, the travel time associated with a particular point
of communication may be determined. After the travel times
associated with the points of communication have been determined,
they may be indicated on the graphical representation (S505). For
example, in a sample graphical representation, the travel times
associated with the points of communication may be indicated by
vertical lines overlaying the continuous plot of tracer
concentration as a function of time. In this manner, an operator or
user of a gas lift well surveillance kit in accordance with one or
more embodiments of the invention may quickly and efficiently
determine whether a point of entry of the tracer/lift gas into
production tubing corresponds to an operating valve or a leak, and
if the point of entry corresponds to an operating valve, the user
may further determine which valve(s) is operating. Thus, the gas
lift well surveillance kit in accordance with one or more
embodiments of the invention provides an efficient graphical means
for comparing the actual travel times of the tracer (which
correspond to points of entry) with the travel times determined for
the points of communication (which correspond to valve positions)
in order to determine whether a point of entry corresponds to entry
of the lift gas into the production tubing through a particular
point of communication (valve) or as a result of a leak. It should
be noted that the well depths associated with each point of entry
are determined using the velocities of the lift gas in the annulus
and in the production tubing calculated for each of the plurality
of ranges of well depth based on the one or more lift gas
parameters, and the calculated well depths may be compared in a
non-graphical manner to known well depths for each point of
communication in order to determine whether each point of entry
corresponds to entry of the lift gas through a valve or a leak in
the production tubing.
It should be noted that any of the previously discussed embodiments
of the invention, although discussed with reference to single
completion tubular flow gas lift well configuration, may be used in
connection with any type of gas lift well configuration known in
the art including any multiple completion gas lift well (well that
includes two or more production tubings). In the case of multiple
completion gas lift wells, a velocity of the lift gas in the
production tubing is calculated for each production tubing, for
each range of well depth associated with the each production
tubing. The velocities may be calculated using one or more of the
parameters discussed earlier, and are further calculated based on
the determined lift gas loss parameters.
A graphical representation indicating the concentration of the
tracer measured over the period of time may be provided for each
production tubing in a multiple completion gas lift well. A lift
gas loss parameter may be determined for each peak in each
graphical representation. An area under each peak for each
graphical representation is determined and the areas are summed to
yield a total area. Then, a lift gas loss parameter is determined
for each peak, which corresponds to a ratio of the area under the
peak to the total area under all peaks for both graphical
representations. In determining the lift gas parameter for a
particular peak it is necessary to sum the areas of all peaks
included in all graphical representations because lift gas is
injected into a common annulus in a multiple completion well and
enters the two or more production tubings from the common
annulus.
FIGS. 6A-6B depict sample graphical representations provided by a
gas lift well surveillance kit in accordance with one or more
embodiments of the invention. Each graph illustrates a continuous
measurement of tracer concentration as a function of time. Vertical
lines in each graph represent tracer travel times corresponding to
each point of communication. The gas lift well that corresponds to
the graph in FIG. 6A has four valves. A vertical line indicative of
a travel time associated with each valve is included in the graph.
As noted earlier, the travel time for each point of communication
is calculated based on the lift gas loss parameters associated with
each actual travel time of tracer (each point of entry). The graph
in FIG. 6A includes three peaks. The baseline tracer concentration
in FIG. 6A oscillates in a periodic sinusoidal manner. However, as
discussed earlier, a regularity or periodicity in the baseline
tracer concentration is not required. The graph in FIG. 6A provides
a quick and efficient means for determining whether the peaks
(points of entry of the lift gas into the production tubing)
correspond to open valves or leaks in the production tubing. Visual
examination of FIG. 6A indicates that the beginning of each peak
coincides with a travel time for a point of communication. Thus, it
can be determined that there are three points of entry of the lift
gas into the production tubing, and the points of entry correspond
to the three shallowest valves. The deepest valve does not appear
to be operating. Further, there do not appear to be significant
leaks of lift gas into the production tubing. The percentage of
lift gas entering at each valve may be determined based on the lift
gas loss parameters. That is, the percentage of lift gas entering
at a particular point of entry corresponds to the ratio of the area
under the peak associated with that point of entry to the total
area under all peaks. From a visual inspection, it can quickly be
determined that the percentage of lift gas entering through each
valve in FIG. 6A is greatest for valve 2 and smallest for valve 3
(valve 1 being the valve with the shortest travel time).
FIG. 6B depicts a sample graphical representation corresponding to
a different well configuration from that in FIG. 6A. The well
represented by the graph in FIG. 6B includes five points of
communication, which correspond to gas lift valves. As in FIG. 6A,
vertical lines are present in the graph and indicate travel times
calculated for each point of communication based on the velocities
in the annulus and in the production tubing determined for each of
the plurality of ranges of well depths based on one or more lift
gas loss parameters. The tracer concentration has three peaks. In
this graph, it is important to note that the baseline tracer
concentration does not exhibit any regularity or periodicity.
However, three peaks in the tracer concentration which correspond
to actual travel times of the tracer and points of entry of the
lift gas into the production tubing can be identified because the
peaks represent deviations in a pattern present in the baseline
tracer concentration. As discussed earlier, a pattern in the
baseline tracer concentration may refer to any characteristic of
the baseline tracer concentration that identifies it as such. In
this example, the pattern in the baseline tracer concentration
indicates small variation in the concentration that lacks any
regularity. The peaks are identifiable as points of entry based on
their deviation from the small variation present in the baseline
tracer concentration.
Visual examination of the graph in FIG. 6B indicates peaks
originating at the travel times associated with valves 1 and 5.
Therefore, it can be concluded that valves 1 and 5 are operating
and lift gas is entering the production tubing through these two
valves. However, the second peak does not coincide with a travel
time for any point of communication. Therefore, a possible
conclusion is that a significant leak of lift gas into the
production tubing is occurring at a well depth that corresponds to
the point of entry represented by the second peak.
In another embodiment, a method of analyzing the performance of a
gas lift well, for example, an unstable well, may involve
conducting transient analysis. The method involves performing a
transient simulation of the gas lift well to obtain a corresponding
non-instantaneous variant of one or more key well parameters. The
non-instantaneous variant of the key well parameters may be derived
with a dynamic simulator.
The dynamic simulator may be pre-calibrated with one or more real
time key well parameter data to drive steady state and transient
simulation to account for time dependent variations in the one or
more key well parameters and obtain a corresponding transient
variant of the one or more key well parameters data. The transient
data that may be derived from the dynamic simulator may be
demonstrated in a multi-dimensional time dependent plot to generate
a dynamic graph. The multi-dimensional time dependent plot may
specify a relation between the well data in one set of transient
data to well data in at least one other set of transient data to
indicate a non-instantaneous variation in the gas lift well
parameters. The results of the transient simulation may be further
automatically adjusted. The adjustment may involve checking a
consistency of a first set of simulator results, for example,
current results, against a second set of simulator results, for
example, an earlier version, and against steady state calculations
based on the real time gas lift well parameter data to ensure an
accepted range of variance and validity. The current results may be
recalculated upon detecting any inconsistency. If the current
results may be found to be acceptable, then the dynamic simulator
can continue to a next step.
In one embodiment, an error function may be used to compare the
results of the dynamic simulation with actual or real time data.
The dynamic simulator may repeat the process in real time until an
acceptable match may be found.
The computer program product (FIG. 1, 80) that is included in a gas
lift well surveillance kit in accordance with one or more
embodiments of the invention is configured to implement one or more
of the previously described methods of the invention. For example,
the computer program product includes instructions for calculating
lift gas velocities in the annulus and in the production tubing
using one or more complex models. The computer program product
includes instructions for storing the annulus and production tubing
parameters discussed earlier (also known as tubing string and
casing string information) and using one or more of these
parameters to determine lift gas velocities in the annulus and in
the production tubing. Lift gas velocities in the production tubing
may be calculated using a multiphase flow pressure model that
includes various parameters related to the flow of gas in a
multi-phase mixture. The computer program product may further
include one or more user interface screens that provide a user with
access to data and models. One or more graphs for studying the
relationship between various parameters may be displayed through
the one or more user interface screens. For example, the graphical
representation of tracer concentration as a function of time has
already been discussed. Plots or graphs indicating the relationship
between the following parameters may also be displayed. Examples of
such plots include, but are not limited to, Depth vs. Pressure,
Depth vs. Temperature, Pressure vs. Production, Historical
real-time data v. Time, Pressure v. Time, Flow Rates v. Time, and
Pressure v. Injection.
In one or more embodiments of the invention, the computer program
product includes instructions for analyzing fluctuating
measurements and errors in measurements, validating and explaining
tracer returns, analyzing the well from different points of view,
viewing the well as a plot or tabular data of tracer concentration
versus time while indicating expected travel times for each of the
points of communication, calibrating the data to line actual travel
times of the tracer with expected travel times calculated for each
of the points of communication, checking the validity of the
calibrations by viewing the well in other points of view (such as a
plot or tabular depth versus pressure) to determine the expected
injection points of the lift gas, and using high quality gas lift
valve models to determine how much gas should pass through each
valve.
For example, a graph of tracer concentration as a function of time
may initially indicate a peak in tracer concentration that does not
coincide with a particular point of communication. However, a plot
of Depth v. Production Pressure may indicate a change in the slope
of the curve at a well depth that corresponds to a particular point
of communication. Thus, the Depth v. Pressure indicates that lift
gas is entering through a particular valve even though the initial
plot of tracer concentration v. time did not provide such an
indication. By analyzing the data from a different point of view
(i.e. the Depth v. Pressure curve), the actual travel times of the
tracer and the parameters used to determine lift gas velocities in
the annulus and in the production tubing may be calibrated to have
the actual tracer travel times coincide with the appropriate points
of communication in the tracer concentration v. time graph. Thus,
viewing the data from multiple perspectives allows for the
necessary calibration of the data.
Points of entry of the lift gas into the production tubing may also
determined under unstable operating conditions. When unstable
conditions exist, averages and/or weighted averages can be used to
determine reasonable tracer travel times using SCADA data. SCADA
data may refer to the one or more casing and tubing related
parameters discussed earlier. In one or more embodiments of the
invention, the computer program product includes instructions for
determining weighted averages for measurements not measured by
SCADA in order to obtain tracer travel time data.
In one or more embodiments, a method for accounting for
unanticipated changes during a well survey is disclosed. The
methods disclosed earlier in this application are typically
intended for steady state flow pressure models. These models assume
averages over the period of the well survey. However, these models
may not be accurate when drastic and sustained changes occur during
the well survey. Examples of drastic and sustained conditions may
include, for example, a loss of the lift gas compressor during the
operation of gas lift well for a period of time, or the well is
shut-in for a period of time during the well survey.
The method for accounting for unanticipated changes during a well
survey includes: injecting a tracer into an annulus formed between
a well casing and a production tubing of the gas lift well, the
annulus including a lift gas, the gas lift well including one or
more points of communication between the annulus and the production
tubing, wherein each of the one or more points of communication
corresponds to a valve position; measuring, over a period of time,
a concentration of the tracer present in a substance retrieved from
the gas lift well; determining one or more actual travel times of
the tracer based on a deviation of the concentration of the tracer
measured over the period of time from a pattern present in a
baseline tracer concentration, wherein each of the one or more
actual travel times of the tracer corresponds to a point of entry
of one or more points of entry of the lift gas into the production
tubing; segmenting results from a gas lift well survey into one or
more segments, wherein the one or more segments represent a
reasonable average over the segment, and wherein an extreme change
in conditions is indicative of a beginning of a new segment;
determining one or more lift gas loss parameters, each of the one
or more lift gas parameters corresponding to a point of entry, each
of the one or more lift gas loss parameters accounting for an
effect of entry of a portion of the tracer into the production
tubing at the corresponding point of entry on the actual travel
time of the tracer that enters the production tubing at each point
of entry located at a depth greater than the corresponding point of
entry; calculating a velocity of the lift gas in the annulus and a
velocity of the lift gas in the production tubing for each of the
plurality of ranges of well depth based on the one or more lift gas
loss parameters; applying an injection loss factor to the
calculated velocity of the lift gas in the annulus and the velocity
of the lift gas in the production tubing to account for a
non-instantaneous velocity changes, wherein the injection loss
factor to be applied is determined on the basis of: i)
approximating a velocity change due to momentum; or ii) calculation
of velocity change due to momentum; and determining the one or more
points of entry of the lift gas into the production tubing based
on: (i) the one or more actual travel times of the tracer, and (ii)
the velocity of the lift gas in the annulus and the velocity of the
lift gas in the production tubing that are calculated for each of
the plurality of ranges of well depth, wherein one or more of the
steps of the method are controlled by at least one computer
processor executing one or more computer program instructions
stored on at least one memory device operatively coupled to the at
least one processor.
In another embodiment, the method for accounting for unanticipated
changes for accounting for unanticipated changes during a well
survey includes: injecting a tracer into an annulus formed between
a well casing and a production tubing of the gas lift well, the
annulus including a lift gas, the gas lift well including one or
more points of communication between the annulus and the production
tubing, wherein each of the one or more points of communication
corresponds to a valve position; measuring, over a period of time,
a concentration of the tracer present in a substance retrieved from
the gas lift well; determining one or more actual travel times of
the tracer based on a deviation of the concentration of the tracer
measured over the period of time from a pattern present in a
baseline tracer concentration, wherein each of the one or more
actual travel times of the tracer corresponds to a point of entry
of one or more points of entry of the lift gas into the production
tubing; segmenting results from a gas lift well survey into one or
more segments, wherein the one or more segments represent a
reasonable average over the segment, and wherein an extreme change
in conditions is indicative of a beginning of a new segment;
determining one or more lift gas loss parameters, each of the one
or more lift gas parameters corresponding to a point of entry, each
of the one or more lift gas loss parameters accounting for an
effect of entry of a portion of the tracer into the production
tubing at the corresponding point of entry on the actual travel
time of the tracer that enters the production tubing at each point
of entry located at a depth greater than the corresponding point of
entry; calculating a velocity of the lift gas in the annulus and a
velocity of the lift gas in the production tubing for each of the
plurality of ranges of well depth based on the one or more lift gas
loss parameters; and determining the one or more points of entry of
the lift gas into the production tubing based on: (i) the one or
more actual travel times of the tracer, and (ii) the velocity of
the lift gas in the annulus and the velocity of the lift gas in the
production tubing that are calculated for each of the plurality of
ranges of well depth, wherein one or more of the steps of the
method are controlled by at least one computer processor executing
one or more computer program instructions stored on at least one
memory device operatively coupled to the at least one
processor.
In another embodiment of the invention, abnormal gas lift well
operating conditions may be monitored by creating one or more
identification cards for each key well parameter. Data on two or
more key well parameters may be measured continually using a
dynamic simulator or proven real time data. The measured key well
data can be used to generate a dynamic graph that relates data in
one set to data in at least one other set. The dynamic graph may be
plotted in two or more dimensions. The shape of the identification
card facilitates easily interpreting injection pump related
problems, for example, when compared to a card showing ideal well
conditions. The identification cards may, therefore, be used to
diagnose and troubleshoot deviations from optimum gas lift well
operating conditions.
In one or more embodiments, a method for analyzing surveyed well
information under changing conditions is disclosed. The gas lift
well conditions are traditionally simulated on a simulator based on
surveyed results. However, occasionally the simulations may diverge
from reality or actual conditions.
The method for analyzing surveyed well information under changing
conditions includes automatically tuning a dynamic simulator
derived transient simulation. The method further includes the
following steps: (i) comparing a current simulator result against
its previous results to ensure an accepted range of variance; (ii)
comparing the current simulator result against a data source to
ensure its validity; (iii) involving one or more key well parameter
data in steady-state calculations within the comparisons; (iv)
matching the current simulator result in steps (i)-(iii) and
correcting the previous result and recalculating the current result
upon detecting any inconsistency; and (v) using steps (ii) and (ii)
to ensure a new current state is acceptable and, if so, permitting
the simulator to continue to a next step.
In one embodiment, the key well parameter data may include well
survey data. For each time period, one or more of the following key
well parameters may be checked: injection pressure, production
pressure, injection temperature, lift gas rate and tracer
concentration.
In another embodiment, the simulator may be calibrated with
real-time surface data. The data source may include real-time data.
For each time period, one or more of the following key well
parameters may be checked: injection pressure, production pressure,
injection temperature, lift gas rate, production temperature,
production manifold pressure and injection choke upstream
pressure.
According to one embodiment, a method for evaluating an unstable
gas lift well includes recording key well parameter data, using the
gas lift well surveillance kit, as described earlier, during a
preliminary well survey. The key well parameter data may be
recorded on a real time basis or at periodic intervals. The method
includes pre-calibrating a dynamic simulator known in the art with
one or more real time key well parameter data to drive steady state
or transient simulation. The transient simulation can account for
transient or time dependent variations in the one or more key well
parameters and obtain a corresponding transient variant of the one
or more key well parameters data. The key well parameter data can
be fed or entered into a dynamic simulator using known techniques.
For example, the key well parameter data may be entered into the
dynamic simulator by a keyboard, a touch screen, or it can be
automatically using computer program instructions. The transient
data that may be derived from the dynamic simulator may be
demonstrated in a multi-dimensional time dependent plot to generate
a dynamic graph. The multi-dimensional time dependent plot may
specify a relation between the well data in one set of transient
data to well data in at least one other set of transient data to
indicate a non-instantaneous variation in the gas lift well
parameters. The current/real time results may be recalculated upon
detecting any inconsistency or if the data does not match a
surveyed. If the current results may be found to be acceptable,
then the dynamic simulator can continue to a next step. The results
of the transient simulation may be further automatically adjusted.
The adjustment may involve the following: (i) comparing a current
simulator result against its previous results to ensure an accepted
range of variance; (ii) comparing the current simulator result
against a data source to ensure its validity; (iii) involving one
or more key well parameter data in steady-state calculations within
the comparisons; (iv) matching the current simulator result in
steps (i)-(iii) and correcting the previous result and
recalculating the current result upon detecting any inconsistency;
and (v) using steps (ii) and (ii) to ensure a new current state is
acceptable and, if so, permitting the simulator to continue to a
next step. The matching may involve the use of a "comparison
module" stored in the memory device. The comparison module can
compare the real time key well parameters with heuristic techniques
for evaluating the gas lift well. The comparison module may also
provide recommendations to the user/operator for making adjustments
to one or more key well parameters. For example, the operator could
adjust casing or tubing pressure depending on the recommendations
generated by the comparison module.
It is contemplated that the embodiments described herein are used
in any operation employing lift gases to determine proper well
functioning. While the foregoing is directed to embodiments of the
present invention, other and further embodiments of the invention
may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof and
the scope thereof is determined by the claims that follow. The
inventions are not limited to the described embodiments, versions
or examples, which are included to enable a person having ordinary
skill in the art to make and use the inventions when the
information in this patent is combined with available information
and technology. The particular embodiments disclosed above are
illustrative only, as the present invention may be modified and
practiced in different but equivalent manners apparent to those
skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings herein.
Furthermore, no limitations are intended to the details of
construction or design herein shown, other than as described in the
claims below. It is, therefore, evident that the particular
illustrative embodiments disclosed above may be altered or modified
and all such variations are considered within the scope and spirit
of the present invention. While the methods and computer program
product are described in terms of "comprising," "containing,"
"involving," or "including" various steps or instructions, the
methods and instructions also can "consist essentially of" or
"consist of" the various steps and instructions. In particular,
every range of values (of the form, "from about a to about b," or,
equivalently, "from approximately a to b") disclosed herein is to
be understood to set forth every number and range encompassed
within the broader range of values. Also, the terms in the claims
have their plain, ordinary meaning unless otherwise explicitly and
clearly defined by the patentee. Moreover, the indefinite articles
"a" or "an", as used in the claims, are defined herein to mean one
or more than one of the element that it introduces. If there is any
conflict in the usages of a word or term in this specification and
one or more patent(s) or other documents that may be incorporated
herein by reference, the definitions that are consistent with this
specification should be adopted.
* * * * *