U.S. patent application number 13/652133 was filed with the patent office on 2014-04-17 for facet joint replacement.
This patent application is currently assigned to GMEDELAWARE 2 LLC. The applicant listed for this patent is T. Wade Fallin, E. Marlowe Goble, Robert Hoy. Invention is credited to T. Wade Fallin, E. Marlowe Goble, Robert Hoy.
Application Number | 20140107782 13/652133 |
Document ID | / |
Family ID | 24917512 |
Filed Date | 2014-04-17 |
United States Patent
Application |
20140107782 |
Kind Code |
A1 |
Goble; E. Marlowe ; et
al. |
April 17, 2014 |
Facet Joint Replacement
Abstract
A prosthesis for the replacement of a diseased or traumatized
facet of a mammalian vertebra includes a surface that articulates
with another prosthetic facet or a natural facet, a portion that
replaces at least a bony portion of the diseased or traumatized
spine facet which is to be replaced, and an element to attach the
prosthesis to the vertebra in a manner that does not require
attachment to or abutment against the posterior arch. A method of
installing the prosthesis includes the steps of resecting at least
a portion of a facet and attaching the prosthesis in a manner that
does not require attachment or abutment against the posterior
arch.
Inventors: |
Goble; E. Marlowe; (Logan,
UT) ; Fallin; T. Wade; (Hyde Park, UT) ; Hoy;
Robert; (Essex Junction, VT) |
|
Applicant: |
Name |
City |
State |
Country |
Type |
Goble; E. Marlowe
Fallin; T. Wade
Hoy; Robert |
Logan
Hyde Park
Essex Junction |
UT
UT
VT |
US
US
US |
|
|
Assignee: |
GMEDELAWARE 2 LLC
Audubon
PA
|
Family ID: |
24917512 |
Appl. No.: |
13/652133 |
Filed: |
October 15, 2012 |
Current U.S.
Class: |
623/17.11 |
Current CPC
Class: |
A61F 2310/00029
20130101; A61F 2310/00958 20130101; Y10S 606/907 20130101; A61F
2310/00017 20130101; A61F 2/44 20130101; A61F 2/30767 20130101;
A61F 2310/00634 20130101; A61F 2002/30574 20130101; A61F 2310/00023
20130101; A61F 2/4405 20130101; A61F 2002/30578 20130101; A61F
2310/00395 20130101; A61F 2310/00796 20130101; A61F 2310/00976
20130101; A61F 2310/00604 20130101 |
Class at
Publication: |
623/17.11 |
International
Class: |
A61F 2/44 20060101
A61F002/44 |
Claims
1. A method of replacing a portion of a spine comprising: resecting
a portion of the spine adjacent a posterior arch; providing an
implant adjacent to the spine, wherein the implant comprises a fin;
and press fitting the fin of the implant into an anterior bone
space of the posterior arch.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the implant comprises a
prosthetic inferior facet.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the prosthetic inferior facet
includes an articulating surface.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein the fin is coated with a porous
coating to promote bone ingrowth.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein the coating may carry an
osteoinductive agent.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein the osteoinductive agent
comprises hydroxylapatite, calcium sulfate, or demineralized bone
matrix.
7. The method of claim 1, further comprising using a broach or
punch to prepare a space for the fin within the posterior arch.
8. A method of replacing a portion of spine comprising: resecting a
portion of the spine adjacent a posterior arch; punching a space in
the posterior arch to accommodate an implant; and press-fitting an
implant in the space in the posterior arch.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein the implant comprises a fin.
10. The method of claim 8, wherein the implant comprises a
prosthetic inferior facet.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein the prosthetic inferior facet
comprises an articulating surface.
12. The method of claim 8, wherein the implant is coated with a
porous coating.
13. The method of claim 12, wherein the coating comprises
hydroxylapatite, calcium sulfate, or demineralized bone matrix.
14. A method of replacing a portion of spine comprising: resecting
a portion of the spine adjacent a pedicle; providing an implant
adjacent the spine, wherein the implant comprises a post; and
creating a space within the pedicle; and inserting the post of the
implant into the space of the pedicle.
15. The method of claim 14, wherein the implant comprises a
prosthetic superior facet.
16. The method of claim 14, wherein creating a space within the
pedicle is by using a broach or a punch.
17. The method of claim 14, wherein the implant is coated with a
porous coating.
18. The method of claim 17, wherein the coating comprises
hydroxylapatite, calcium sulfate, or demineralized bone matrix.
19. The method of claim 14, wherein the implant comprises an
articulatable surface.
20. The method of claim 19, wherein the implant is configured to
articulate with an inferior implant comprising a fin.
Description
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No.
11/211,849, filed Aug. 24, 2005, which is a continuation of:
[0002] U.S. Ser. No. 10/421,078, filed Apr. 23, 2003, and entitled
FACET JOINT REPLACEMENT (Attorney's Docket No. MED-1 CON), which is
a continuation of:
[0003] U.S. Ser. No. 09/726,169, filed Nov. 29, 2000, and entitled
FACET JOINT REPLACEMENT (Attorney's Docket No. MED-1), which is now
issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,579,319.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0004] 1. Field of the Invention
[0005] The present invention relates to surgical devices and
methods to replace a damaged, diseased, or otherwise painful spinal
facet joint.
[0006] 2. The Relevant Technology
[0007] Traumatic, inflammatory, metabolic, synovial, neoplastic,
and degenerative disorders of the spine can produce debilitating
pain that can have severe socioeconomic and psychological effects.
One of the most common surgical interventions today is arthrodesis,
or spine fusion, of one or more motion segments, with approximately
300,000 procedures performed annually in the United States.
Clinical success varies considerably, depending upon technique and
indications, and consideration must be given to the concomitant
risks and complications. For example, it has been shown that spine
fusion decreases function by limiting the range of motion for
patients in flexion, extension, rotation, and lateral bending.
Furthermore, it is believed that spine fusion creates increased
stresses and, therefore, accelerated degeneration of adjacent
non-fused motion segments. Additionally, pseudoarthrosis, as a
result of an incomplete or ineffective fusion, may reduce or even
eliminate pain relief for the patient. Finally, the fusion device,
whether artificial or biological, may migrate out of the fusion
site.
[0008] Recently, several attempts have been made to recreate the
natural biomechanics of the spine by use of an artificial disc.
Artificial discs provide for articulation between vertebral bodies
to recreate the full range of motion allowed by the elastic
properties of the natural intervertebral disc which directly
connects two opposed vertebral bodies.
[0009] However, the artificial discs proposed to date do not fully
address the mechanics of motion of the spinal column. In addition
to the intervertebral disc, posterior elements called the facet
joints help to support axial, torsional and shear loads that act on
the spinal column. Furthermore, the facet joints are diarthroidal
joints that provide both sliding articulation and load transmission
features. The effects of their absence as a result of facetectomy
is believed to produce significant decreases in the stiffness of
the spinal column in all planes of motion: flexion and extension,
lateral bending, and rotation. Furthermore, contraindications for
artificial discs include arthritic facet joints, absent facet
joints, severe facet joint tropism or otherwise deformed facet
joints.
[0010] U.S. Pat. No. Re. 36,758 to Fitz discloses an artificial
facet joint where the inferior facet, the mating superior facet, or
both, are covered with a cap. The cap requires no preparation of
the bone or articular surfaces; it covers and, therefore, preserves
the bony and articular structure.
[0011] The capping of the facet has several potential
disadvantages. If the facet joint is osteoarthritic, a cap will not
remove the source of the pain. Additionally, at least in the case
of surface replacements for osteoarthritis femoral heads, the
capping of articular bone ends has proven to lead to clinical
failure by means of mechanical loosening. The clinical failure is
hypothesized to be a sequela of disrupting the periosteum and
ligamentum teres femoris, both serving a nutrition delivery role to
the femoral head, thereby leading to avascular necrosis of the bony
support structure for the surface replacement. Another potential
disadvantage is that in order to accommodate the wide variability
in anatomical morphology of the facets, not only between
individuals but also between levels within the spinal column, a
very wide variety of sizes and shapes would be required.
[0012] U.S. Pat. No. 6,132,464 to Martin discloses a spinal facet
joint prosthesis that is supported on the lamina, or the posterior
arch of the vertebra. Extending from this support structure are
inferior and/or superior blades that replace the cartilage at the
facet joint. Like the Fitz design, the Martin prosthesis generally
preserves existing bony structures and therefore does not address
pathologies which affect the bone of the facets in addition to
affecting the associated cartilage. Furthermore, the Martin
invention requires a mating condition between the prosthesis and
the lamina, or the posterior arch, that is a thin base of curved
bone that carries all four facets and the spinous process. Since
the posterior arch is a very complex and highly variable anatomic
surface, it would be very difficult to design a prosthesis that
provides reproducible positioning to correctly locate the
cartilage-replacing blades for the facet joints.
[0013] Another approach to surgical intervention for spinal facets
is provided in WO9848717A1 to Villaret. While Villaret teaches the
replacement of spine facets, the replacement is interlocked in a
manner to immobilize the joint.
[0014] Facet joint replacement in conjunction with artificial disc
replacements represent a unique solution to recreating a fully
functional motion segment that is compromised due to disease or
trauma. Together, facet joint and disc replacement can eliminate
all sources of pain, return full function and range of motion, and
completely restore the natural biomechanics of the spinal column.
Additionally, degenerative or traumatized facet joints may be
replaced in the absence of disc replacement when the natural
intervertebral disc is unaffected by the disease or trauma.
[0015] It would therefore be an improvement in the art to provide a
vertebral facet replacement device and method that replaces a bony
portion of the facets so as to remove the source of arthritic,
traumatic, or other disease mediated pain.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0016] It is an object of the invention to provide an artificial
vertebral facet that replaces the cartilage and a portion of the
bone of a facet.
[0017] It is a further object of the invention to provide a method
for preparing a facet for the installation of an artificial
vertebral facet.
[0018] It is another object to provide a method for replacing a
spinal facet.
[0019] It is yet another object of the invention to provide a total
vertebral facet joint replacement.
[0020] In the preferred embodiment, an inferior facet of a superior
vertebra is resected at the base of the facet where it connects to
the posterior arch. The fin of a prosthetic inferior facet is
pressed into the interior bone space of the posterior arch.
Alternatively, a tool, such as a broach or punch, may be used to
first prepare a space for the fin within the posterior arch.
[0021] Alternatively, or in addition, a superior facet of an
inferior vertebra that articulates with the inferior facet is
resected at the base of the facet where it connects to the pedicle.
The post of a prosthetic superior facet is pressed into the
interior bone space of the pedicle. Alternatively, a tool, such as
a broach or punch, may be used to first prepare a space for the
post within the pedicle.
[0022] The post and the fin may be porous coated to promote bone
ingrowth in order to achieve long term fixation. Acute fixation is
provided by a press fit between the post or fin and the internal
surface of the bone. The porous coating may carry osteoconductive
agents, such as hydroxylapatite, calcium sulfate, or demineralized
bone matrix. Alternatively, the porous coating may carry
osteoinductive agents, such as bone morphogenic proteins, including
rhBMP-2 and rhBMP-7.
[0023] Another embodiment of the present invention provides a
flange extending from the prosthetic facet. The flange is oriented
relative to the body of the prosthesis such that when the flange is
placed against the pedicle and in a manner such that the planar
surface of the flange is perpendicular to the axis of the pedicle
interior bone canal, the articulating surface of the prosthesis
will be properly positioned to match the articulating surface of
the natural facet. The flange includes a hole for the passage of a
fastener to securely attach the prosthesis to the pedicle. The
fastener can be a screw, spike, tack, staple, or the like.
[0024] Because the present invention allows for the individual
replacements of facets, only compromised facets need be replaced.
For example, if only one facet is affected by disease or trauma, it
can be resected and replaced with a facet prosthesis that
articulates with an opposing natural facet.
[0025] The present invention has numerous advantages over the prior
art. One advantage is that the quality of attachment of the
prosthesis is improved. The present invention provides a precise
and tight press fit into bones, as opposed to relying on prosthetic
surfaces mating with highly complex and variable external surfaces
of the vertebra, such as the posterior arch or facet. Another
advantage is that the optional porous coating is placed into
interior bone spaces where porous coatings have proven to achieve
bone ingrowth for excellent long term fixation strength. This
ability to achieve bone ingrowth is uncertain for the prior art
devices that engage the external bone surfaces of the vertebra. Yet
another advantage lies in the removal of the facet bone structure;
where the facet bone is involved in the disease pathology or the
trauma that compromised the articular or cartilaginous surface of
the facet, resection provides a means for ensuring that all pain
associated with the disease or trauma is removed and the true joint
line is restored. With prior art devices, the bony structure of the
facets was generally left intact.
[0026] The above, and other objects, features and advantages of the
present invention, will become apparent from the following
description which is to be read in conjunction with the
accompanying drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0027] These and other objects and features of the present
invention will be more fully disclosed or rendered obvious by the
following detailed description of the preferred embodiments of the
invention, which is to be considered together with the accompanying
drawings wherein like numbers refer to like parts and further
wherein:
[0028] FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a portion of the spine;
[0029] FIG. 1A is a dorsal view of the portion of the spine shown
in FIG. 1;
[0030] FIG. 2 is a lateral view of a facet joint reconstructed in
accordance with the present invention;
[0031] FIG. 3 is a dorsal view of the facet joint shown in FIG.
2;
[0032] FIG. 4 is a perspective view of the implanted left inferior
facet prosthesis shown in FIGS. 2 and 3;
[0033] FIG. 5 is a perspective view of the left inferior facet
prosthesis shown in FIGS. 2 and 3;
[0034] FIG. 6 is a cranial view of the implanted left superior
facet prosthesis shown in FIGS. 2 and 3;
[0035] FIG. 7 is a perspective view of the left superior facet
prosthesis shown in FIGS. 2 and 3;
[0036] FIG. 8 is a perspective view of an alternate implanted left
superior facet prosthesis;
[0037] FIG. 9 is a perspective view of an alternate left superior
facet prosthesis;
[0038] FIG. 10 is a lateral view of an alternative reconstructed
facet joint;
[0039] FIG. 11 is a dorsal view of an alternative reconstructed
facet joint;
[0040] FIG. 12 is a perspective view of the implanted left inferior
facet prosthesis shown in FIGS. 10 and 11;
[0041] FIG. 13 is a perspective view of the alternative left
inferior facet prosthesis shown in FIGS. 10 and 11;
[0042] FIG. 14 is a cranial view of the alternative implanted left
superior facet prosthesis FIGS. 10 and 11
[0043] FIG. 15 is a perspective view of the alternative left
superior facet prosthesis shown in FIGS. 10 and 11; and
[0044] FIG. 16 is a perspective view of an alternate bearing
surface for the superior facet is shown in FIG. 15.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS
[0045] Referring now to FIGS. 1 and 1A, there is shown a superior
vertebra 1 and an inferior vertebra 3, with an intervertebral disc
2 located in between. Vertebra 1 has superior facets 43, inferior
facets 6, posterior arch 35 and spinous process 46. Vertebra 3 has
superior facets 7, inferior facets 44, posterior arch 36 and
spinous process 45.
[0046] Referring now to FIG. 2, the left inferior facet 6 of
vertebra 1 has been resected and an inferior facet prosthesis 4 has
been attached to vertebra 1. Similarly, the left superior facet of
vertebra 3 has been resected and a superior facet prosthesis 5 has
been attached to vertebra 3.
[0047] FIG. 3 illustrates a dorsal view of the elements shown in 2.
It can be appreciated that inferior facet prosthesis 4 replicates
the natural anatomy when compared to the contralateral inferior
facet 6 of vertebra 1. Similarly, it can be appreciated that
superior facet prosthesis 5 replicates the natural anatomy when
compared to the contralateral superior facet 7 of vertebra 3.
[0048] Turning now to FIG. 4, a perspective view of vertebra 1 with
implanted inferior facet prosthesis 4 is provided. Resection at 31
has removed the natural inferior facet 6 at the bony junction
between the inferior facet 6 and the posterior arch 35. In this
manner, any bone pain associated with a disease, such as
osteoarthritis, or trauma will be eliminated as the involved bony
tissue has been osteotomized
[0049] FIG. 5 illustrates a perspective view of inferior facet
prosthesis 4. Surface 8 replicates the natural articular surface of
the replaced inferior facet 6. Post 9 provides a means to affix
inferior facet prosthesis 4 to vertebra 1. Post 9 is implanted into
the interior bone space of the left pedicle P (FIG. 6) on vertebra
1 and may or may not extend into the vertebral body of vertebra 1
to provide additional stability.
[0050] FIG. 6 illustrates a cranial view of vertebra 3 with
implanted superior facet prosthesis 5. Resection surface 32
represents the bony junction between the natural superior facet and
the posterior arch 35.
[0051] FIG. 7 illustrates a perspective view of superior facet
prosthesis 5. Surface 36 replicates the natural articular surface
of the replaced superior facet 7. Post 37 provides a means for
affixing superior facet prosthesis 5 to vertebra 3. Post 37 is
implanted into the interior bone space of the left pedicle P (FIG.
6) on vertebra 3 and may or may not extend into the vertebral body
of vertebra 3 to provide additional stability.
[0052] When the total facet joint is replaced, as shown in FIGS. 2
and 3, then surface 8 (FIG. 5) articulates with surface 36 (FIG. 7)
to recreate the natural biomechanics of the spine motion segment
made up of vertebra 1, vertebra 3, and intervertebral disc 2.
[0053] FIG. 8 illustrates an alternative inferior facet prosthesis
10 which is implanted into the interior bone space of posterior
arch 35. The interior bone space is accessed from the resection
31.
[0054] FIG. 9 shows details of alternative inferior facet
prosthesis 10, including the fin 13 that extends into the interior
bone space of posterior arch 35. Surface 12 replicates the natural
articular surface of the replaced facet.
[0055] If desired, a corresponding fin construction can be used to
form a prosthetic superior facet.
[0056] The surfaces of post 9 (FIG. 5), post 37 (FIG. 7) and fin 13
(FIG. 9) may or may not include porous coatings to facilitate bone
ingrowth to enhance the long term fixation of the implant.
Furthermore, such porous coatings may or may not include
osteoinductive or osteoconductive substances to further enhance the
bone remodeling into the porous coating.
[0057] Referring now to FIG. 10, there is shown a lateral view of a
superior vertebra 14 and an inferior vertebra 16, with an
intervertebral disc 15 located in between is shown. The left
inferior facet of vertebra 14 has been resected and an inferior
facet prosthesis 18 has been attached to vertebra 14 by means of a
screw fastener 17, wherein the screw fastener is implanted into an
interior bone space of the pedicle of the vertebra. Similarly, the
left superior facet of vertebra 16 has been resected and a superior
facet prosthesis 19 has been attached to vertebra 16 by means of a
screw fastener 17, wherein the screw fastener is implanted into an
interior bone space of the pedicle of the vertebra.
[0058] FIG. 11 illustrates a dorsal view of the elements of FIG.
10. It can be appreciated that inferior facet prosthesis 18
replicates the natural anatomy when compared to the contralateral
inferior facet 22 of vertebra 14. Similarly, it can be appreciated
that superior facet prosthesis 19 replicates the natural anatomy
when compared to the contralateral superior facet 21 of vertebra
16. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, inferior
facet prosthesis 18 and/or superior facet prosthesis 19 has a bone
contacting surface which is porous coated to allow for bone
ingrowth.
[0059] Turning now to FIG. 12, there is provided a perspective view
of vertebra 14 with implanted inferior facet prosthesis 18.
Resection 34 has removed the natural inferior facet at the bony
junction between the inferior facet and the posterior arch 37. In
this manner, any bone pain associated with a disease, such as
osteoarthritis, or trauma will be eliminated inasmuch as the
involved bony tissue has been osteotomized.
[0060] FIG. 13 illustrates a perspective view of inferior facet
prosthesis 18. Surface 23 replicates the natural articular surface
of the replaced facet. Flange 25 contacts the pedicle and hole 24
receives a fastener to attach inferior facet prosthesis 18 to
vertebra 14.
[0061] FIG. 14 illustrates a cranial view of vertebra 16 with
implanted superior facet prosthesis 19. Resection surface 35
represents the bony junction between the natural superior facet and
the posterior arch 38.
[0062] FIG. 15 illustrates a perspective view of superior facet
prosthesis 19. Surface 27 replicates the natural articular surface
of the replaced facet. Flange 39 contacts the pedicle and hole 26
receives a fastener to attach inferior facet prosthesis 19 to
vertebra 16.
[0063] FIG. 16 illustrates an alternative superior facet prosthesis
40 with an bearing surface 41 that mounts to substrate 42. The
bearing surface 41 is a biocompatible polymeric material, such as
ultra high molecular weight polyethylene. Alternately, the bearing
surface can be ceramic, such as zirconia or alumina, or metal. The
substrate is a biocompatible metal alloy, such as an alloy of
titanium, cobalt, or iron.
[0064] Having described preferred embodiments of the invention with
reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to be understood that
the embodiments shown herein are by way of example, and that
various changes and modifications may be effected by one skilled in
the art without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention
as defined in the following claims.
* * * * *