Trademark applications and grants for Zuo Minglei. Zuo Minglei has 5 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "TENTOP"
Entity Type | INDIVIDUAL |
Address | Rm701,Unit2,Bld29,BinheShuiyuanCommunity No. 001, Zhenzhuquan Road, Sishui County Shandong CHINA 273200 |
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
MOBILE RECEIVING DEVICE AND METHOD, AND DEVICE FOR SELECTING MEDIA STREAMS being a Continuation of PCT International Application No. PCT/CN2007/070494, filed August 15, 2007 20090178095 - 12/400994 ZUO; Minglei | 2009-07-09 |
System And Method For Receiving Internet Protocol Television Service 20070150926 - 11/559450 Zuo; Minglei | 2007-06-28 |
Gateway for Remote Control and System and Method for Implementing Remote Control 20070149189 - 11/619448 YANG; Bo ;   et al. | 2007-06-28 |
Gateway for remote control and system and method for implementing remote control 8,045,970 - 11/619,448 Yang , et al. October 25, 2 | 2011-10-25 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
---|---|
"TENTOP" 90890507 |
TENTOP 2021-08-18 |
"ITFEED" 90890633 |
ITFEED 2021-08-18 |
"UPSEED" 90890658 |
UPSEED 2021-08-18 |
"MYTUBE" 90890674 |
MYTUBE 2021-08-18 |
"JOYVIEW" 90890479 |
JOYVIEW 2021-08-18 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.