ZHU; Jesse
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for ZHU; Jesse.The latest application filed is for "gas-solid fluidized bed dry beneficiation process using beneficiation density gradient".
- ZHU; Jesse - Jiangsu CN
- Zhu; Jesse - London CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Gas-solid Fluidized Bed Dry Beneficiation Process Using Beneficiation Density Gradient App 20220176411 - ZHAO; Yuemin ; et al. | 2022-06-09 |
| Method and apparatus for dispensing paint powders for powder coatings Grant 7,240,861 - Zhu , et al. July 10, 2 | 2007-07-10 |
| Method and apparatus for dispensing paint powders for powder coatings App 20050035229 - Zhu, Jesse ; et al. | 2005-02-17 |
| Fluidization additives to fine powders Grant 6,833,185 - Zhu , et al. December 21, 2 | 2004-12-21 |
| Apparatus for volumetric metering of small quantity of powder from fluidized beds Grant 6,684,917 - Zhu , et al. February 3, 2 | 2004-02-03 |
| Fluidization additives to fine powders App 20040009340 - Zhu, Jesse ; et al. | 2004-01-15 |
| Apparatus for volumetric metering of small quantity of powder from fluidized beds App 20030111131 - Zhu, Jesse ; et al. | 2003-06-19 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 