Zhou; Cuifeng
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Zhou; Cuifeng.The latest application filed is for "knowledge reasoning method of boolean satisfiability (sat)".
- Zhou; Cuifeng - Santa Clara CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Systems and methods for providing collaborative coexistence between bluetooth and Wi-Fi Grant 9,326,310 - Zhang , et al. April 26, 2 | 2016-04-26 |
| Antenna optimum beamforming for multiple protocol co-existence on a wireless device Grant 8,880,000 - Zhou November 4, 2 | 2014-11-04 |
| Knowledge Reasoning Method of Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) App 20140289181 - Han; Sherwin ; et al. | 2014-09-25 |
| Systems and methods for providing collaborative coexistence between Bluetooth and Wi-Fi Grant 8,706,032 - Zhang , et al. April 22, 2 | 2014-04-22 |
| Knowledge Reasoning Method of Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) App 20130179378 - Han; Sherwin ; et al. | 2013-07-11 |
| Antenna optimum beam forming for multiple protocol coexistence on a wireless device Grant 8,238,832 - Zhou August 7, 2 | 2012-08-07 |
| Systems And Methods For Providing Collaborative Coexistence Between Bluetooth And Wi-fi App 20080254745 - Zhang; Zhenyu ; et al. | 2008-10-16 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 