loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Yoest; Rachael L..The latest application filed is for "polarizing photochromic articles".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Mesogenic stabilizers Grant 8,623,238 - Xu , et al. January 7, 2 | 2014-01-07 |
Mesogenic stabilizers Grant 8,613,868 - Dai , et al. December 24, 2 | 2013-12-24 |
Polarizing photochromic articles Grant 8,582,192 - Kumar , et al. November 12, 2 | 2013-11-12 |
Polarizing photochromic articles Grant 8,545,015 - Kumar , et al. October 1, 2 | 2013-10-01 |
Mesogenic stabilizers Grant 8,431,039 - Dai , et al. April 30, 2 | 2013-04-30 |
Mesogenic stabilizers Grant 8,349,210 - Xu , et al. January 8, 2 | 2013-01-08 |
Polarizing Photochromic Articles App 20120120473 - Kumar; Anil ;   et al. | 2012-05-17 |
Mesogenic Stabilizers App 20120027960 - Xu; Ruisong ;   et al. | 2012-02-02 |
Mesogenic Stabilizers App 20120021144 - Dai; Xiao-Man ;   et al. | 2012-01-26 |
Mesogenic Stabilizers App 20120003401 - XU; Ruisong ;   et al. | 2012-01-05 |
Mesogenic Stabilizers App 20120002141 - Dai; Xiao-Man ;   et al. | 2012-01-05 |
Polarizing Photochromic Articles App 20110279883 - Kumar; Anil ;   et al. | 2011-11-17 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.