loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Yeung; Gus Wai Yan.The latest application filed is for "apparatus for unaligned cache reads and methods therefor".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Apparatus for unaligned cache reads and methods therefor Grant 6,915,385 - Leasure , et al. July 5, 2 | 2005-07-05 |
Method for skipping a latch in timing-sensitive dynamic circuits of a multi-clocked system with unspecific underlap requirement Grant 6,737,888 - Lattimore , et al. May 18, 2 | 2004-05-18 |
System and method for invalidating an entry in a translation unit Grant 6,338,128 - Chang , et al. January 8, 2 | 2002-01-08 |
Circuit driver on SOI for merged logic and memory circuits Grant 6,157,216 - Lattimore , et al. December 5, 2 | 2000-12-05 |
Sensing circuit for a memory cell array Grant 6,134,164 - Lattimore , et al. October 17, 2 | 2000-10-17 |
Conditional restore for RAM based on feedback from a RAM cell to precharge circuitry Grant 6,108,255 - Ciraula , et al. August 22, 2 | 2000-08-22 |
Redundant memory array Grant 5,953,745 - Lattimore , et al. September 14, 1 | 1999-09-14 |
Memory cell Grant 5,831,896 - Lattimore , et al. November 3, 1 | 1998-11-03 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.