Yano; Nobuyuki
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Yano; Nobuyuki.The latest application filed is for "slit lamp microscope provided with a confocal scanning mechanism".
- Yano; Nobuyuki - Okazaki JP
- Yano; Nobuyuki - Hirakata JP
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Slit lamp microscope provided with a confocal scanning mechanism Grant 5,701,197 - Yano December 23, 1 | 1997-12-23 |
| Ophthalmic apparatus having three dimensional calculating means Grant 5,596,377 - Yano January 21, 1 | 1997-01-21 |
| Ophthalmometric apparatus with alignment device including filter means Grant 5,557,350 - Yano September 17, 1 | 1996-09-17 |
| Optometric apparatus Grant 5,444,504 - Kobayashi , et al. August 22, 1 | 1995-08-22 |
| Laser apparatus including binocular indirect ophthalmoscope Grant 5,252,999 - Sukigara , et al. October 12, 1 | 1993-10-12 |
| Apparatus for photographic retroillumination image on eyeground Grant 5,202,708 - Sasaki , et al. April 13, 1 | 1993-04-13 |
| Heat exchanging system Grant 4,582,129 - Yano , et al. April 15, 1 | 1986-04-15 |
| Air-conditioning machine Grant 4,478,053 - Yano , et al. October 23, 1 | 1984-10-23 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 