Yamaguchi; Motofumi
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Yamaguchi; Motofumi.The latest application filed is for "dual channel broadcast receiver and mobile terminal having same".
- Yamaguchi; Motofumi - Osaka JP
- YAMAGUCHI; Motofumi - Osaka-shi JP
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Dipole antenna device, earphone antenna device, and wireless communication terminal device connected to the device Grant 8,094,859 - Suematsu , et al. January 10, 2 | 2012-01-10 |
| Antenna, earphone antenna, and broadcasting receiver including earphone antenna Grant 7,542,007 - Yamaguchi , et al. June 2, 2 | 2009-06-02 |
| Dual Channel Broadcast Receiver And Mobile Terminal Having Same App 20090137273 - Yamaguchi; Motofumi | 2009-05-28 |
| Portable Terminal Device App 20080224932 - SUEMATSU; Eiji ; et al. | 2008-09-18 |
| Antenna, Earphone Antenna, And Broadcasting Receiver Including Earphone Antenna App 20080198090 - YAMAGUCHI; Motofumi ; et al. | 2008-08-21 |
| Dipole Antenna Device, Earphone Antenna Device, And Wireless Communication Terminal Device Connected To The Device App 20080170739 - SUEMATSU; Eiji ; et al. | 2008-07-17 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 