loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Wright; Richard R..The latest application filed is for "compound dome window for a surveillance camera".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Tire tread Grant D630,997 - Wright , et al. January 18, 2 | 2011-01-18 |
Compound dome window for a surveillance camera Grant 7,306,383 - Jones , et al. December 11, 2 | 2007-12-11 |
Adjustable camera with belt tensioning apparatus Grant 7,111,998 - Wright September 26, 2 | 2006-09-26 |
Compound dome window for a surveillance camera App 20060024046 - Jones; Theodore L. ;   et al. | 2006-02-02 |
Adjustable camera with belt tensioning apparatus App 20050259984 - Wright, Richard R. | 2005-11-24 |
Drive Mechanism For Surveillance Camera Pan And Tilt App 20010045991 - VAN RENS, PIET C.J. ;   et al. | 2001-11-29 |
Airblast fuel injector Grant 4,773,596 - Wright , et al. September 27, 1 | 1988-09-27 |
Fuel nozzle for gas turbine engine Grant 4,609,150 - Pane, Jr. , et al. September 2, 1 | 1986-09-02 |
Fuel nozzle for gas turbine engine Grant 4,418,543 - Faucher , et al. December 6, 1 | 1983-12-06 |
Anti-coke fuel nozzle Grant 4,362,022 - Faucher , et al. December 7, 1 | 1982-12-07 |
SEC | 0001195305 | WRIGHT RICHARD R |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.