Worth Beauty L L C
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Worth Beauty L L C. Worth Beauty L L C has 4 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "BLENDSMART"
- Company Aliases
- WORTH BEAUTY LLC
- Worth Beauty, LLC
- Worth Beauty, LLC - Houston TX US
- Worth Beauty, LLC - Richmond VA US
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| COMPUTERIZED COSMETICS BRUSHES 20210120947 - 17/139521 Machiorlette; Steven C. ; et al. | 2021-04-29 |
| COMPUTERIZED COSMETICS BRUSHES 20200260860 - Machiorlette; Steven C. ; et al. | 2020-08-20 |
| COMPUTERIZED COSMETICS BRUSHES 20170095070 - 15/281293 Machiorlette; Steven C. ; et al. | 2017-04-06 |
| APPLICATOR ASSEMBLY 20170000251 - 15/264263 Machiorlette; Steven C. ; et al. | 2017-01-05 |
| COSMETIC APPLICATOR SYSTEMS 20160324306 - 15/073584 Martin; Carol ; et al. | 2016-11-10 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
"BLENDSMART" 5256062 87295928 |
BLENDSMART 2017-01-10 |
"AIRTOUCH" 5303465 87289381 |
AIRTOUCH 2017-01-04 |
"SHAVESMART" 5643998 87183550 |
SHAVESMART 2016-09-26 |
"BLENDSMART" 4842589 86397716 |
BLENDSMART 2014-09-17 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 