loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Wong; Anthony Y..The latest application filed is for "high performance backplane driver circuit".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
High performance backplane driver circuit Grant 5,594,370 - Nguyen , et al. January 14, 1 | 1997-01-14 |
Electronic system including high performance backplane driver/receiver circuits Grant 5,576,642 - Nguyen , et al. November 19, 1 | 1996-11-19 |
CMOS Differential driver circuit for high offset ground Grant 5,491,432 - Wong , et al. February 13, 1 | 1996-02-13 |
All-CMOS high-impedance output buffer for a bus driven by multiple power-supply voltages Grant 5,444,397 - Wong , et al. August 22, 1 | 1995-08-22 |
Application specific integrated circuit and placement and routing software with non-customizable first metal layer and vias and customizable second metal grid pattern Grant 5,404,033 - Wong , et al. April 4, 1 | 1995-04-04 |
High-speed CMOS buffer with controlled slew rate Grant 4,987,324 - Wong , et al. January 22, 1 | 1991-01-22 |
Double metal HCMOS compacted array Grant 4,884,118 - Hui , et al. November 28, 1 | 1989-11-28 |
Two-mode driver circuit Grant 4,859,870 - Wong , et al. August 22, 1 | 1989-08-22 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.