Wilms; Karl-Heinz
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Wilms; Karl-Heinz.The latest application filed is for "apparatus for the observation and the treatment of the eye using a laser".
- Wilms; Karl-Heinz - Emmering DE
- Wilms; Karl-Heinz - Dachau DT
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Apparatus for the observation and the treatment of the eye using a laser Grant 6,267,756 - Feuerstein , et al. July 31, 2 | 2001-07-31 |
| Apparatus for the examination of objects and the determination of topography Grant 5,663,781 - Wilms , et al. September 2, 1 | 1997-09-02 |
| Contact eyeglass Grant 5,252,998 - Reis , et al. October 12, 1 | 1993-10-12 |
| Device for the integration of operating light in an ocular examination instrument Grant 4,772,116 - Schroder , et al. September 20, 1 | 1988-09-20 |
| Optical device with two reflecting surfaces Grant 4,439,026 - Wilms March 27, 1 | 1984-03-27 |
| Phototopometer Grant 4,312,574 - Wilms January 26, 1 | 1982-01-26 |
| Method And Apparatus For The Enlarged Representation Of The Cross-section Of Non-destructed Contact Lenses Or The Like Grant 3,822,096 - Wilms , et al. July 2, 1 | 1974-07-02 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 