Williams; Christopher John
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Williams; Christopher John.The latest application filed is for "egg transfer module having free-moving ejector, and associated systems and methods".
- Williams; Christopher John - Apex NC
- Williams; Christopher John - Manchester by the Sea MA US
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Egg transfer module having free-moving ejector, and associated systems and methods Grant 10,946,995 - Suh , et al. March 16, 2 | 2021-03-16 |
| Method for reducing pathogens in poultry hatchery operations Grant 10,798,921 - Williams October 13, 2 | 2020-10-13 |
| Egg Transfer Module Having Free-moving Ejector, And Associated Systems And Methods App 20190291903 - Suh; William Dongwook ; et al. | 2019-09-26 |
| Method For Reducing Pathogens In Poultry Hatchery Operations App 20180220626 - Williams; Christopher John | 2018-08-09 |
| Flexible radix switch Grant 8,830,873 - Tomic , et al. September 9, 2 | 2014-09-09 |
| Flexible Radix Switch App 20130083701 - Tomic; Ratko V. ; et al. | 2013-04-04 |
| Methods of injecting substances into eggs with reduced contamination App 20040040511 - Williams, Christopher John | 2004-03-04 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 