Wildbolz; Rudolf
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Wildbolz; Rudolf.The latest application filed is for "method and drafting arrangement for spinning machines for processing a fiber sliver".
- Wildbolz; Rudolf - Winterthur CH
- Wildbolz; Rudolf - CH-8400 Winterthur CH
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Method and drafting arrangement for spinning machines for processing a fiber sliver Grant 4,413,378 - Mandl , et al. November 8, 1 | 1983-11-08 |
| Method and apparatus for checking a blending plant for textile staple fibres Grant 4,399,590 - Wildbolz August 23, 1 | 1983-08-23 |
| Method of and apparatus for maintaining substantially constant a quantity of opened fibrous material Grant 4,353,667 - Mandl , et al. October 12, 1 | 1982-10-12 |
| Apparatus for eliminating metallic contaminations from a fibre transporting duct in spinning preparation Grant 4,171,262 - Lattmann , et al. October 16, 1 | 1979-10-16 |
| Apparatus For Separating Fiber Flocks From A Transporting Air Stream Grant 3,787,093 - Hanselmann , et al. January 22, 1 | 1974-01-22 |
| Bale Reducing Apparatus And Method Of Reducing Fiber Bales Grant 3,736,624 - Alt , et al. June 5, 1 | 1973-06-05 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 