Wiker; J. Clayton
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Wiker; J. Clayton.The latest application filed is for "apparatus and method for photogrammetric surgical localization".
- Wiker; J. Clayton - Salt Lake City UT
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Apparatus and method for photogrammetric surgical localization Grant 6,491,702 - Heilbrun , et al. December 10, 2 | 2002-12-10 |
| Apparatus and method for photogrammetric surgical localization App 20010039421 - Heilbrun, Marl Peter ; et al. | 2001-11-08 |
| Apparatus and method for photogrammetric surgical localization Grant 6,165,181 - Heilbrun , et al. December 26, 2 | 2000-12-26 |
| Apparatus and method for photogrammetric surgical localization Grant 6,146,390 - Heilbrun , et al. November 14, 2 | 2000-11-14 |
| Apparatus and method for photogrammetric surgical localization Grant 5,836,954 - Heilbrun , et al. November 17, 1 | 1998-11-17 |
| Apparatus and method for photogrammetric surgical localization Grant 5,603,318 - Heilbrun , et al. * February 18, 1 | 1997-02-18 |
| Apparatus and method for photogrammetric surgical localization Grant 5,389,101 - Heilbrun , et al. February 14, 1 | 1995-02-14 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 