Whittam; Thomas V.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Whittam; Thomas V..The latest application filed is for "zeolite nu-13 and process for its preparation using piperazine compounds".
- Whittam; Thomas V. - Darlington GB2
- Whittam; Thomas V. - Wilton GB2
- Whittam; Thomas V. - Stockton on Tees GB2
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Zeolite Nu-13 and process for its preparation using piperazine compounds Grant 4,743,437 - Whittam May 10, 1 | 1988-05-10 |
| Zeolite EU-1 and a method of making zeolite EU-1 Grant 4,537,754 - Casci , et al. August 27, 1 | 1985-08-27 |
| Zeolite and process for preparing the same Grant 4,528,171 - Casci , et al. July 9, 1 | 1985-07-09 |
| Zeolite Nu-5 Grant 4,420,467 - Whittam December 13, 1 | 1983-12-13 |
| Zeolites Nu-6(1) and Nu-6(2) Grant 4,397,825 - Whittam August 9, 1 | 1983-08-09 |
| Hydrocarbon conversion Grant 4,386,230 - Hogan , et al. May 31, 1 | 1983-05-31 |
| Zeolite Nu-3 Grant 4,372,930 - Short , et al. February 8, 1 | 1983-02-08 |
| Zeolite synthesis Grant 4,275,047 - Whittam June 23, 1 | 1981-06-23 |
| Olefins Grant 4,172,856 - Spencer , et al. October 30, 1 | 1979-10-30 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 