loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Whigham; Roger C..The latest application filed is for "beverage dispenser with automatic ratio control".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Beverage dispenser with automatic ratio control Grant 5,192,000 - Wandrick , et al. March 9, 1 | 1993-03-09 |
Beverage dispensing valve with flow control lever arm Grant 5,129,434 - Whigham , et al. July 14, 1 | 1992-07-14 |
Beverage dispenser Grant D324,795 - Hoover , et al. March 24, 1 | 1992-03-24 |
Microprocessor based ratio adjustment and portion control system for postmix beverage dispensing valves Grant 5,062,555 - Whigham , et al. November 5, 1 | 1991-11-05 |
Nozzle for postmix beverage dispenser Grant 5,033,651 - Whigham , et al. July 23, 1 | 1991-07-23 |
Beverage dispenser control valve and ratio control method therefor Grant 4,979,639 - Hoover , et al. Dec | 1990-12-25 |
Beverage dispenser Grant D311,844 - Chase , et al. November 6, 1 | 1990-11-06 |
Post-mix beverage dispenser valve with continuous solenoid modulation Grant 4,884,720 - Whigham , et al. December 5, 1 | 1989-12-05 |
Narrow, multiflavor beverage dispenser valve assembly and tower Grant 4,821,925 - Wiley , et al. April 18, 1 | 1989-04-18 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.