Westwood; Nicholas
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Westwood; Nicholas.The latest application filed is for "modified heterocyclase".
- Westwood; Nicholas - St. Andrews GB
- Westwood; Nicholas - Dundee GB
- Westwood; Nicholas - St. Andrews Fife GB
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Modified heterocyclase Grant 10,647,977 - Naismith , et al. | 2020-05-12 |
| In vitro production of cyclic peptides Grant 10,494,657 - Ibrahim , et al. De | 2019-12-03 |
| Modified Heterocyclase App 20180245061 - NAISMITH; James ; et al. | 2018-08-30 |
| In Vitro Production Of Cyclic Peptides App 20180179570 - Ibrahim; Wael Houssen ; et al. | 2018-06-28 |
| In Vitro Production Of Cyclic Peptides App 20150322474 - Houssen Ibrahim; Wael ; et al. | 2015-11-12 |
| Thiazolo-, oxazalo and imidazolo-quinazoline compounds capable of inhibiting protein kinases Grant 7,576,091 - McInnes , et al. August 18, 2 | 2009-08-18 |
| Thiazolo-, oxazalo and imidazolo-quinazoline compounds capable of inhibiting protein kinases App 20060264628 - McInnes; Campbell ; et al. | 2006-11-23 |
| Alkaloids Grant 6,797,819 - Shair , et al. September 28, 2 | 2004-09-28 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 